Availability of Grant Funds for Fiscal Year 2008, 32051-32053 [E8-12459]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 109 / Thursday, June 5, 2008 / Notices
page reproduction costs), or in the
amount of $799.25 for the Consent
Decree and Appendices (3197 pages),
made payable to the U.S. Treasury or, if
by e-mail or fax, forward a check in that
amount to the Consent Decree Library at
the stated address.
William D. Brighton,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement
Section, Environment and Natural Resources
Division.
[FR Doc. E8–12514 Filed 6–4–08; 8:45 am]
The last notification was filed with
the Department on February 27, 2008. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the
Act on April 7, 2008 (73 FR 18812).
WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF format to
Ms. Mina Innes, Research Program
Officer, at the Marine Mammal
Commission, e-mail address:
minnes@mmc.gov.
Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. E8–12529 Filed 6–4–08; 8:45 am]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Inquiries should be directed to Dr.
Robert Gisiner, Scientific Program
Director, by mail (4340 East-West
Highway, Room 700, Bethesda, MD
20814), phone (301–504–0087), or email (bgisiner@mmc.gov). Please also
copy e-mail inquiries to Ms. Mina Innes
(minnes@mmc.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Marine Mammal Commission
FY2008 Focused Research Topics.
Purpose: The U.S. Marine Mammal
Commission is seeking proposals for
research and related activities that will
further the conservation and
management goals of the Marine
Mammal Protection Act. Proposals
should be tailored to address either of
two focused research topics: (1)
Conservation of Critically Endangered
Marine Mammal Species or Populations
and (2) Indirect Effects of Fisheries on
Marine Mammals.
Grantees or contractors whose
projects involve the taking of marine
mammals will be expected to obtain all
necessary permits and authorizations for
their projects before engaging in such
activities.
Information on the focused research
topics, selection criteria, required
formats for full proposals, the
submission process, and the submission
schedule is provided below.
Financial Information: A total of
$450,000 has been allocated for this
RFP. Allocation of the total amount
between the two focused research topics
will be determined by the nature and
quality of proposals within each topic
and the degree to which the selected
proposals contribute to an integrated
program of effort within each research
topic as determined during the final
review phase.
Duration of Effort: The Commission
strongly encourages that proposals be
limited to a single period of effort,
usually one year. Multi-year proposals,
not to exceed three years, may be
considered, but only if a strong case can
be made for the necessity of a prolonged
effort.
Individual Award Amount: No upper
or lower limit has been set for an
individual proposal due to the wide
range of potential levels of effort within
each focused research topic. However, it
is anticipated that few if any awards
will exceed $50,000 to $100,000, and
that most will range between $30,000
and $50,000, based on the Commission’s
BILLING CODE 4410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
Mine Safety and Health Administration
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Petitions for Modification
Antitrust Division
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES
Notice is hereby given that, on April
23, 2008, pursuant to section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Southwest Research
Institute—Cooperative Research Group
on Clean Diesel V (‘‘Clean Diesel V’’)
has filed written notifications
simultaneously with the Attorney
General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its
membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the
Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, Chevron, Richmond, CA;
Modine Mfg. Co., Racine, WI; Dayco
Ensa, S.I., Vigo, Spain; Nissan Technical
Center N.A., Inc., Farmington Hills, MI;
EP America, Inc., Global Fuels
Technology, Naperville, IL;
International Truck & Engine Corp.,
Melrose Park, IL; Sasol Technology
(PTY) Ltd., Johannesburg, Republic Of
South Africa; Robert Bosch LLC,
Farmington Hills, MI; and NGK Spark
Plug Co., Ltd., Nagoya, Japan have been
added as parties to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and Clean Diesel
V intends to file additional written
notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
On January 10, 2008, Clean Diesel V
filed its original notification pursuant to
section 6(a) of the Act. The Department
of Justice published a notice in the
Federal Register pursuant to section
6(b) of the Act on February 25, 2008 (73
FR 10064).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:51 Jun 04, 2008
Mine Safety and Health
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Correction Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Cooperative Research
Group on Clean Diesel V
Jkt 214001
32051
SUMMARY: This is a correction to a notice
of petitions for modification of existing
safety standards that was published in
the Federal Register on May 30, 2008
(73 FR 31149). In the notice we
inadvertently listed the company name
as TJS Mining Company, Inc., for
petition for modification, docket
number M–2008–024–C. The correct
company name is the Penn View Mining
Company, Inc., TJS #6 Mine, MSHA
Mine I.D. 36–09464.
Dated: May 30, 2008.
Jack Powasnik,
Deputy Director, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances.
[FR Doc. E8–12597 Filed 6–4–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–43–P
MARINE MAMMAL COMMISSION
Availability of Grant Funds for Fiscal
Year 2008
Marine Mammal Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Authority: Marine Mammal Protection Act
of 1972 (1361 et seq.)
SUMMARY: The U.S. Marine Mammal
Commission is seeking proposals for
research and related activities that will
further the conservation and
management goals of the Marine
Mammal Protection Act. Proposals
should be tailored to address either of
two focused research topics: (1)
Conservation of Critically Endangered
Marine Mammal Species or Populations
and (2) Indirect Effects of Fisheries on
Marine Mammals.
DATES: Proposals must be received by 15
July 2008, 5 p.m., EDT.
ADDRESSES: Proposals should be
submitted electronically in MSWord,
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
32052
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 109 / Thursday, June 5, 2008 / Notices
desire to focus on initial phase scoping
efforts and to be able to address a
sufficient range of actions and
approaches within each area. Proposers
are encouraged to present a budget
consistent with the type and level of
effort proposed, rather than on a specific
dollar target, since budget realism,
aligned with anticipated scientific and
conservation impact, constitutes the
largest share of the review weighting
process.
Indirect Costs: Proposers are
encouraged to keep their overhead costs
at or below 10 percent in keeping with
the Marine Mammal Commission’s
stated policy on indirect costs. This
policy is intended to maximize the
impact on science and conservation
from the limited resources available to
the Commission for discretionary
spending (also see https://www.mmc.gov/
research/).
Focused Research Topics
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES
1. Conservation of Critically Endangered
Marine Mammal Species or Populations
The Commission is requesting
proposals for research or other activities
that will promote the conservation of
critically endangered marine mammal
species or populations, with a particular
focus on those for which current
research efforts are non-existent or
underfunded. Such proposals could
include the following:
• Collection and analysis of data on
critically endangered marine mammals
and/or the threats facing them, with the
goal of informing conservation
decisions;
• Development and implementation
of strategies for prioritizing and
commumcating critical conservation
needs to the public and decisionmakers;
• Initiation of conservation activities
to address the principal threats facing
critically endangered marine mammals.
The at-risk species or populations
may occur in domestic, foreign, or
international waters. The Commission is
not likely to fund proposals to continue
ongoing conservation programs but will
consider proposals to provide seed
money or start-up funds to initiate new
efforts, with the goal of creating selfsustaining conservation efforts that do
not duplicate pre-existing efforts.
Priority will be given to proposals based
on the degree of endangerment to the
species or population, the usefulness
and relevance of the research in
addressing a threat and promoting
conservation, and the extent to which
other funding sources are or are not
available. Proposals should reflect a
thorough knowledge of ongoing research
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:51 Jun 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
and conservation efforts and should
clearly indicate both the importance of
the proposed work and the limitations
imposed by current funding levels or
opportunities.
2. InDirect Effects of Fisheries on Marine
Mammals
Commercial, recreational, and
subsistence fisheries have the potential
to affect marine mammals and other
predators directly through bycatch and
indirectly by altering the availability of
prey resources (e.g., exploitative or
interference competition). The Marine
Mammal Protection Act establishes a
comprehensive framework for managing
bycatch of marine mammals, but the
indirect effects of fishing are poorly
understood and largely unmanaged.
Despite growing emphasis on
ecosystem-based fisheries management,
much of the research effort to date has
been limited to the indirect effects of
fishing on non-target fish stocks with
little attention paid to the effects on
higher-trophic-level predators. Indirect
effects of fisheries can be complex, and
research programs to investigate those
effects have been slow to develop.
The Commission is requesting
proposals for studies that seek to
describe quantitatively the indirect
effects of fishing on marine mammals or
to develop approaches for mitigating
those effects. Proposals may include,
but are not limited to, the following
approaches:
• Comparative experiments between
fished and unfished areas to assess the
potential impact of fisheries on marine
mammals;
• Development and performance
testing of conceptual fishery
management approaches that explicitly
consider indirect effects of fishing on
marine mammals;
• Ecosystem dynamics modeling
studies that investigate the functional
relationships between marine mammal
predators, their prey, and fisheries in
appropriate spatial/temporal context
(i.e., including consideration of spatial
and temporal overlap between
predators, prey, and fisheries);
• Field validation of such modeling
studies.
Methodological approaches and data
requirements for such projects are
described on pages 41–44 of Chapter 3,
‘‘Indirect Fisheries Interactions,’’ in J.E.
Reynolds III et al. ‘‘Marine Mammal
Research: Conservation Beyond Crisis’’
(The Johns Hopkins University Press,
Baltimore, MD). Proposers may find this
reference helpful in organizing their
proposed efforts, although adherence to
the referenced guidance is not required.
Proposals will be considered both for
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
small stocks and fisheries as well as for
larger marine mammal populations or
large-scale fisheries.
Proposals on other aspects of indirect
fishery effects on marine mammals will
be considered, but priority will be given
to proposals that address critical gaps in
current understanding of indirect
fishery effects. In all cases, proposals
should indicate a thorough knowledge
of relevant topics and should describe
explicitly how the proposed work will
build upon, but not duplicate, previous
efforts. The Commission will consider
proposals for workshops or reviews of
historical data as well as original
research projects.
Selection criteria: Proposals will be
evaluated using the normal consultative
process of the Marine Mammal
Commission with its Committee of
Scientific Advisors on Marine Mammals
and the Commission staff. The following
factors will be considered.
• Relevance to the focused research
topic as described in this statement and
to the overall mission of the Marine
Mammal Commission as described on
the Commission’s Web site (https://
www.mmc.gov/aboutmmc/) (40 points).
• Scientific and conservation merit of
the proposed approach and anticipated
end products (30 points).
• Qualifications of the proposal team
(15 points).
• Realism of the proposed budget (15
points).
Commission staff will compile
reviewer recommendations and forward
the ranked recommendations to the
Commissioners for final review. The
Commissioners will make the final
funding determination based on their
assessment of the combination of
projects that will most effectively
promote the conservation and
management goals of the Marine
Mammal Protection Act within the
funds allocated for this funding
opportunity.
Proposal Format
The proposal body must not exceed
eight pages (single-sided, or four pages
double-sided) using 12 point font,
exclusive of cover page, budget page(s),
curriculum vitae, and supporting
materials.
• Cover Page: The cover page shall
include the following information, in
any format:
Æ Title: The full title of the proposal.
A shorter, running title is optional.
Æ Research Topic: List the RFP topic
to which the proposal is addressed (1)
Critically Endangered Species or (2)
Indirect Effects of Fisheries. Listing of
topic subheadings (items indicated by
bullets under each topic) is optional.
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 109 / Thursday, June 5, 2008 / Notices
Æ Keywords (optional): a list of three
to six keywords, indicating species,
regions, research methods, or
disciplinary areas of effort.
Æ Principal Investigator: Please list
only one (corresponding) principal
investigator even if your proposal team
consists of two or more co-equal
investigators and institutions (also see
instructions for Curricula Vitae, below).
Æ PI Contact Information: Address,
phone, and e-mail for the principal
investigator.
Æ Financial Point of Contact: The
individual (with or without institutional
affiliation, as appropriate) who will be
responsible for contractual and fiscal
matters. This may or may not be the
same individual and institution listed as
principal investigator.
Æ Financial Point of Contact
Information: address, phone, and e-mail
for the financial point of contact.
• Body of Proposal
Æ Abstract (optional): Provide an
abstract of the proposal summarizing
the problem or question to be addressed,
the methods to be used to address the
problem or question, possible outcomes
of the work, and the utility of the
research for advancing science and
management related to marine
mammals. Please limit the abstract to
approximately 200 words.
Æ Introduction, Background, or
Problem Statement: Provide a review of
past related effort by the research team
or others. Indicate knowledge gaps,
shortfalls of prior efforts, or challenges
to further progress and describe how the
proposed effort will address these
issues.
Æ Goals and Objectives: Provide
statements of both the general or broad
goal of the proposed research and the
specific objectives that will be
addressed within the scope of this
proposal to make progress toward the
broader, general goal.
Æ Methods: Provide a detailed
description of the methods of the
investigation so that the reviewer can
understand how you will address each
of the specific objectives. If you are not
conducting original research but are
developing a workshop, review panel or
other activity, describe the nature of the
activity, the planned agenda or working
format, likely attendees/participants,
and
Æ Tentative dates and location of the
planned activity.
Æ Anticipated Outcomes: Describe the
short-term outcomes and those
anticipated to occur within the scope of
effort and time span of the proposed
project (e.g., completion of a workshop
report, one or more peer-reviewed
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:51 Jun 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
journal articles, an equipment
prototype, and report).
Æ Research and Management Utility
(Long-Term Outcome): Describe the
anticipated long-term utility of the
project and its implications for future
research, management, or conservation
activities.
• Budget and Time Line: Although
there is no specified format for the
budget, this section should provide
sufficient detail to inform the reviewer
of expenses or costs by general category
(salary, equipment, supplies, travel,
publication, overhead, miscellaneous)
and by sub-tasks within the proposed
effort, as appropriate. Include
information on other sources of funding
for the project, if applicable. For multiyear or multi-stage projects, include a
time table for completion of each phase
as a means of gauging progress toward
completion of the full proposed effort.
• Curricula Vitae, Research Team
Qualifications: Provide a curriculum
vitae or short biography of no more than
two pages for all key members of the
proposal team (those individuals whose
unique background and experience are
essential to completion of the project),
including their experience or expertise
related to the subject proposal.
Although there can only be one
principal investigator (see Title Page
guidance), multiple co-investigators can
be designated in this portion of the
proposal, if desired.
• Supporting Materials: Supporting
materials such as recent publications,
short descriptions of relevant work in
progress or recently completed,
organization charts or time lines will be
accepted, but should be limited to
information absolutely essential to
understanding the significance,
approach and context of the proposed
work. The presence or absence of
supporting materials will not be a
consideration in proposal evaluations. It
is highly recommended that supporting
materials be limited to fewer than 20 to
30 pages or 5 Mb; the more material
provided, the less likely it is to be used
by the reviewers in developing their
evaluations.
Submission process: Proposals should
be submitted electronically in MSWord,
WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF format to
Ms. Mina Innes, Research Program
Officer, at the Marine Mammal
Commission, e-mail address
minnes@mmc.gov.
Timing of Submission and Review
Process
15 July 2008; 5 p.m. EDT Full
proposals due to the Marine Mammal
Commission.
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32053
11 August 2008; 5 p.m. EDT
Successful applicants informed of final
Decisions.
Proposals received after the due date
and time listed above will not, under
any circumstances, be forwarded for
review.
Inquiries: Inquiries should be directed
to Dr. Robert Gisiner, Scientific Program
Director, by mail (4340 East-West
Highway, Room 700, Bethesda, MD
20814), phone (301–504–0087) or e-mail
(bgisiner@minc.gov). Please also copy email inquiries to Ms. Mina Innes
(minnes@mmc.gov).
Dated: May 29, 2008.
Timothy J. Ragen,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. E8–12459 Filed 6–4–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–31–M
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
REVIEW COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meeting
May 30, 2008.
TIME AND DATE:
10 a.m., Wednesday,
June 11, 2008
The Richard V. Backley Hearing
Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
PLACE:
STATUS:
Open.
The
Commission will consider and act upon
the following in open session: Secretary
of Labor v. Twentymile Coal Company,
Docket No. WEST 2007–892–E. (Issues
include whether the Secretary properly
interpreted the breathable air provisions
of section 316 of the Mine Act and
whether the MSHA District Manager
erred in refusing to approve the
operator’s emergency response plan
unless it provided for a refuge chamber
in the main entry.)
Any person attending this meeting
who requires special accessibility
features and/or auxiliary aids, such as
sign language interpreters, must inform
the Commission in advance of those
needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3)
and 2706.160(d).
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
Jean
Ellen, (202) 434–9950 / (202) 708–9300
for TDD Relay / 1–800–877–8339 for toll
free.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO:
Jean H. Ellen,
Chief Docket Clerk.
[FR Doc. 08–1327 Filed 6–3–08; 3:55 pm]
BILLING CODE 6735–01–P
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 109 (Thursday, June 5, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32051-32053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-12459]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
MARINE MAMMAL COMMISSION
Availability of Grant Funds for Fiscal Year 2008
AGENCY: Marine Mammal Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority: Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (1361 et seq.)
SUMMARY: The U.S. Marine Mammal Commission is seeking proposals for
research and related activities that will further the conservation and
management goals of the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Proposals should
be tailored to address either of two focused research topics: (1)
Conservation of Critically Endangered Marine Mammal Species or
Populations and (2) Indirect Effects of Fisheries on Marine Mammals.
DATES: Proposals must be received by 15 July 2008, 5 p.m., EDT.
ADDRESSES: Proposals should be submitted electronically in MSWord,
WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF format to Ms. Mina Innes, Research Program
Officer, at the Marine Mammal Commission, e-mail address:
minnes@mmc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inquiries should be directed to Dr.
Robert Gisiner, Scientific Program Director, by mail (4340 East-West
Highway, Room 700, Bethesda, MD 20814), phone (301-504-0087), or e-mail
(bgisiner@mmc.gov). Please also copy e-mail inquiries to Ms. Mina Innes
(minnes@mmc.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Marine Mammal Commission FY2008 Focused Research Topics.
Purpose: The U.S. Marine Mammal Commission is seeking proposals for
research and related activities that will further the conservation and
management goals of the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Proposals should
be tailored to address either of two focused research topics: (1)
Conservation of Critically Endangered Marine Mammal Species or
Populations and (2) Indirect Effects of Fisheries on Marine Mammals.
Grantees or contractors whose projects involve the taking of marine
mammals will be expected to obtain all necessary permits and
authorizations for their projects before engaging in such activities.
Information on the focused research topics, selection criteria,
required formats for full proposals, the submission process, and the
submission schedule is provided below.
Financial Information: A total of $450,000 has been allocated for
this RFP. Allocation of the total amount between the two focused
research topics will be determined by the nature and quality of
proposals within each topic and the degree to which the selected
proposals contribute to an integrated program of effort within each
research topic as determined during the final review phase.
Duration of Effort: The Commission strongly encourages that
proposals be limited to a single period of effort, usually one year.
Multi-year proposals, not to exceed three years, may be considered, but
only if a strong case can be made for the necessity of a prolonged
effort.
Individual Award Amount: No upper or lower limit has been set for
an individual proposal due to the wide range of potential levels of
effort within each focused research topic. However, it is anticipated
that few if any awards will exceed $50,000 to $100,000, and that most
will range between $30,000 and $50,000, based on the Commission's
[[Page 32052]]
desire to focus on initial phase scoping efforts and to be able to
address a sufficient range of actions and approaches within each area.
Proposers are encouraged to present a budget consistent with the type
and level of effort proposed, rather than on a specific dollar target,
since budget realism, aligned with anticipated scientific and
conservation impact, constitutes the largest share of the review
weighting process.
Indirect Costs: Proposers are encouraged to keep their overhead
costs at or below 10 percent in keeping with the Marine Mammal
Commission's stated policy on indirect costs. This policy is intended
to maximize the impact on science and conservation from the limited
resources available to the Commission for discretionary spending (also
see https://www.mmc.gov/research/).
Focused Research Topics
1. Conservation of Critically Endangered Marine Mammal Species or
Populations
The Commission is requesting proposals for research or other
activities that will promote the conservation of critically endangered
marine mammal species or populations, with a particular focus on those
for which current research efforts are non-existent or underfunded.
Such proposals could include the following:
Collection and analysis of data on critically endangered
marine mammals and/or the threats facing them, with the goal of
informing conservation decisions;
Development and implementation of strategies for
prioritizing and commumcating critical conservation needs to the public
and decision-makers;
Initiation of conservation activities to address the
principal threats facing critically endangered marine mammals.
The at-risk species or populations may occur in domestic, foreign,
or international waters. The Commission is not likely to fund proposals
to continue ongoing conservation programs but will consider proposals
to provide seed money or start-up funds to initiate new efforts, with
the goal of creating self-sustaining conservation efforts that do not
duplicate pre-existing efforts. Priority will be given to proposals
based on the degree of endangerment to the species or population, the
usefulness and relevance of the research in addressing a threat and
promoting conservation, and the extent to which other funding sources
are or are not available. Proposals should reflect a thorough knowledge
of ongoing research and conservation efforts and should clearly
indicate both the importance of the proposed work and the limitations
imposed by current funding levels or opportunities.
2. InDirect Effects of Fisheries on Marine Mammals
Commercial, recreational, and subsistence fisheries have the
potential to affect marine mammals and other predators directly through
bycatch and indirectly by altering the availability of prey resources
(e.g., exploitative or interference competition). The Marine Mammal
Protection Act establishes a comprehensive framework for managing
bycatch of marine mammals, but the indirect effects of fishing are
poorly understood and largely unmanaged. Despite growing emphasis on
ecosystem-based fisheries management, much of the research effort to
date has been limited to the indirect effects of fishing on non-target
fish stocks with little attention paid to the effects on higher-
trophic-level predators. Indirect effects of fisheries can be complex,
and research programs to investigate those effects have been slow to
develop.
The Commission is requesting proposals for studies that seek to
describe quantitatively the indirect effects of fishing on marine
mammals or to develop approaches for mitigating those effects.
Proposals may include, but are not limited to, the following
approaches:
Comparative experiments between fished and unfished areas
to assess the potential impact of fisheries on marine mammals;
Development and performance testing of conceptual fishery
management approaches that explicitly consider indirect effects of
fishing on marine mammals;
Ecosystem dynamics modeling studies that investigate the
functional relationships between marine mammal predators, their prey,
and fisheries in appropriate spatial/temporal context (i.e., including
consideration of spatial and temporal overlap between predators, prey,
and fisheries);
Field validation of such modeling studies.
Methodological approaches and data requirements for such projects
are described on pages 41-44 of Chapter 3, ``Indirect Fisheries
Interactions,'' in J.E. Reynolds III et al. ``Marine Mammal Research:
Conservation Beyond Crisis'' (The Johns Hopkins University Press,
Baltimore, MD). Proposers may find this reference helpful in organizing
their proposed efforts, although adherence to the referenced guidance
is not required. Proposals will be considered both for small stocks and
fisheries as well as for larger marine mammal populations or large-
scale fisheries.
Proposals on other aspects of indirect fishery effects on marine
mammals will be considered, but priority will be given to proposals
that address critical gaps in current understanding of indirect fishery
effects. In all cases, proposals should indicate a thorough knowledge
of relevant topics and should describe explicitly how the proposed work
will build upon, but not duplicate, previous efforts. The Commission
will consider proposals for workshops or reviews of historical data as
well as original research projects.
Selection criteria: Proposals will be evaluated using the normal
consultative process of the Marine Mammal Commission with its Committee
of Scientific Advisors on Marine Mammals and the Commission staff. The
following factors will be considered.
Relevance to the focused research topic as described in
this statement and to the overall mission of the Marine Mammal
Commission as described on the Commission's Web site (https://
www.mmc.gov/aboutmmc/) (40 points).
Scientific and conservation merit of the proposed approach
and anticipated end products (30 points).
Qualifications of the proposal team (15 points).
Realism of the proposed budget (15 points).
Commission staff will compile reviewer recommendations and forward
the ranked recommendations to the Commissioners for final review. The
Commissioners will make the final funding determination based on their
assessment of the combination of projects that will most effectively
promote the conservation and management goals of the Marine Mammal
Protection Act within the funds allocated for this funding opportunity.
Proposal Format
The proposal body must not exceed eight pages (single-sided, or
four pages double-sided) using 12 point font, exclusive of cover page,
budget page(s), curriculum vitae, and supporting materials.
Cover Page: The cover page shall include the following
information, in any format:
[cir] Title: The full title of the proposal. A shorter, running
title is optional.
[cir] Research Topic: List the RFP topic to which the proposal is
addressed (1) Critically Endangered Species or (2) Indirect Effects of
Fisheries. Listing of topic subheadings (items indicated by bullets
under each topic) is optional.
[[Page 32053]]
[cir] Keywords (optional): a list of three to six keywords,
indicating species, regions, research methods, or disciplinary areas of
effort.
[cir] Principal Investigator: Please list only one (corresponding)
principal investigator even if your proposal team consists of two or
more co-equal investigators and institutions (also see instructions for
Curricula Vitae, below).
[cir] PI Contact Information: Address, phone, and e-mail for the
principal investigator.
[cir] Financial Point of Contact: The individual (with or without
institutional affiliation, as appropriate) who will be responsible for
contractual and fiscal matters. This may or may not be the same
individual and institution listed as principal investigator.
[cir] Financial Point of Contact Information: address, phone, and
e-mail for the financial point of contact.
Body of Proposal
[cir] Abstract (optional): Provide an abstract of the proposal
summarizing the problem or question to be addressed, the methods to be
used to address the problem or question, possible outcomes of the work,
and the utility of the research for advancing science and management
related to marine mammals. Please limit the abstract to approximately
200 words.
[cir] Introduction, Background, or Problem Statement: Provide a
review of past related effort by the research team or others. Indicate
knowledge gaps, shortfalls of prior efforts, or challenges to further
progress and describe how the proposed effort will address these
issues.
[cir] Goals and Objectives: Provide statements of both the general
or broad goal of the proposed research and the specific objectives that
will be addressed within the scope of this proposal to make progress
toward the broader, general goal.
[cir] Methods: Provide a detailed description of the methods of the
investigation so that the reviewer can understand how you will address
each of the specific objectives. If you are not conducting original
research but are developing a workshop, review panel or other activity,
describe the nature of the activity, the planned agenda or working
format, likely attendees/participants, and
[cir] Tentative dates and location of the planned activity.
[cir] Anticipated Outcomes: Describe the short-term outcomes and
those anticipated to occur within the scope of effort and time span of
the proposed project (e.g., completion of a workshop report, one or
more peer-reviewed journal articles, an equipment prototype, and
report).
[cir] Research and Management Utility (Long-Term Outcome): Describe
the anticipated long-term utility of the project and its implications
for future research, management, or conservation activities.
Budget and Time Line: Although there is no specified
format for the budget, this section should provide sufficient detail to
inform the reviewer of expenses or costs by general category (salary,
equipment, supplies, travel, publication, overhead, miscellaneous) and
by sub-tasks within the proposed effort, as appropriate. Include
information on other sources of funding for the project, if applicable.
For multi-year or multi-stage projects, include a time table for
completion of each phase as a means of gauging progress toward
completion of the full proposed effort.
Curricula Vitae, Research Team Qualifications: Provide a
curriculum vitae or short biography of no more than two pages for all
key members of the proposal team (those individuals whose unique
background and experience are essential to completion of the project),
including their experience or expertise related to the subject
proposal. Although there can only be one principal investigator (see
Title Page guidance), multiple co-investigators can be designated in
this portion of the proposal, if desired.
Supporting Materials: Supporting materials such as recent
publications, short descriptions of relevant work in progress or
recently completed, organization charts or time lines will be accepted,
but should be limited to information absolutely essential to
understanding the significance, approach and context of the proposed
work. The presence or absence of supporting materials will not be a
consideration in proposal evaluations. It is highly recommended that
supporting materials be limited to fewer than 20 to 30 pages or 5 Mb;
the more material provided, the less likely it is to be used by the
reviewers in developing their evaluations.
Submission process: Proposals should be submitted electronically in
MSWord, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF format to Ms. Mina Innes, Research
Program Officer, at the Marine Mammal Commission, e-mail address
minnes@mmc.gov.
Timing of Submission and Review Process
15 July 2008; 5 p.m. EDT Full proposals due to the Marine Mammal
Commission.
11 August 2008; 5 p.m. EDT Successful applicants informed of final
Decisions.
Proposals received after the due date and time listed above will
not, under any circumstances, be forwarded for review.
Inquiries: Inquiries should be directed to Dr. Robert Gisiner,
Scientific Program Director, by mail (4340 East-West Highway, Room 700,
Bethesda, MD 20814), phone (301-504-0087) or e-mail
(bgisiner@minc.gov). Please also copy e-mail inquiries to Ms. Mina
Innes (minnes@mmc.gov).
Dated: May 29, 2008.
Timothy J. Ragen,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. E8-12459 Filed 6-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-31-M