2-Oxepanone, homopolymer; Tolerance Exemption, 31753-31756 [E8-11980]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 4, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
PART 3—ADJUDICATION
38 CFR Part 3
1. The authority citation for part 3,
subpart A continues to read as follows:
RIN 2900–AG15
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), unless
otherwise noted.
I
§ 3.309
Disease Subject to Presumptive
Service Connection; Correction
[Corrected]
AGENCY:
2. In § 3.309(d)(3)(vii)(C), remove
‘‘paragraph (d)(4)(vi)’’ and add, in its
place, ‘‘paragraph (d)(3)(vi)’’.
ACTION:
[FR Doc. E8–12378 Filed 6–3–08; 8:45 am]
I
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Correcting amendment.
SUMMARY: This document contains a
correction to the regulations of the
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
that governs presumptive service
connection for certain diseases from
exposure to ionizing radiation during
military service. This correction is
required in order to amend a crossreference in the regulation. No
substantive change to the content of the
regulations is being made by this
correcting amendment.
DATES: Effective Date: June 4, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tracy Wang, Office of Regulation Policy
and Management (00REG), Department
of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461–
4902.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VA
published a final rule in the Federal
Register on April 27, 1993 (See 58 FR
25563), to implement Section 2 of the
Veterans’ Radiation Exposure
Amendments of 1992, Public Law 102–
578, which amended 38 U.S.C. 1112(c)
to repeal the requirement that, to be
presumed service connected, specified
diseases of veterans who participated in
a radiation-risk activity to become at
least 10 percent disabling within 40
years after the veterans’ last exposure to
radiation. Accordingly, VA removed 38
CFR 3.309(d)(3) and redesignated
§ 3.309(d)(4) as the new § 3.309(d)(3).
However, VA neglected to amend the
reference to the redesignated
§ 3.309(d)(3) that appears at
§ 3.309(d)(3)(vii)(C). This document
corrects that omission by removing
‘‘(d)(4)(vi)’’ and adding, in its place,
‘‘(d)(3)(vi)’’.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 3
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Disability benefits,
Health care, Pensions, Veterans,
Vietnam.
Approved: May 29, 2008.
William F. Russo,
Director of Regulations Management.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, VA is correcting 38 CFR part
3 as follows.
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:46 Jun 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0096; FRL–8362–8]
2-Oxepanone, homopolymer;
Tolerance Exemption
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of 2-oxepanone,
homopolymer; (CAS Reg. No. 24980–
41–4) when used as an inert ingredient
in a pesticide chemical formulation.
Solvay Chemicals, Inc. submitted a
petition to EPA under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as
amended by the Food Quality Protection
Act of 1996 (FQPA) requesting an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance. This regulation eliminates the
need to establish a maximum
permissible level for residues of 2oxepanone, homopolymer.
DATES: This regulation is effective June
4, 2008. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
August 4, 2008, and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2008–0096. To access the
electronic docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, select ‘‘Advanced
Search,’’ then ‘‘Docket Search.’’ Insert
the docket ID number where indicated
and select the ‘‘Submit’’ button. Follow
the instructions on the regulations.gov
website to view the docket index or
access available documents. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the docket index available in
regulations.gov. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31753
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S–
4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is (703) 305–
5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen Samek, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 347–8825; e-mail address:
samek.karen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does This Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. To determine whether
you or your business may be affected by
this action, you should carefully
examine the applicability provisions in
Unit II. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies
of This Document?
In addition to accessing an electronic
copy of this Federal Register document
E:\FR\FM\04JNR1.SGM
04JNR1
31754
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 4, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
through the electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, you may access
this ‘‘Federal Register’’ document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may
also access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Printing
Office’s pilot e-CFR site at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing
Request?
Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, as
amended by FQPA, any person may file
an objection to any aspect of this
regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. The EPA
procedural regulations which govern the
submission of objections and requests
for hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178.
You must file your objection or request
a hearing on this regulation in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2008–0096 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
requests must be in writing, and must be
mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk
on or before August 4, 2008.
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing that does not
contain any CBI for inclusion in the
public docket that is described in
ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2
may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit your
copies, identified by docket ID number
EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0096, by one of
the following methods.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is
(703) 305–5805.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:46 Jun 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of March 12,
2008 (73 FR 13225) (FRL–8354–6), EPA
issued a notice pursuant to section 408
of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a, as amended
by FQPA (Public Law 104–170),
announcing the filing of a pesticide
petition (PP 8E7321) by Solvay
Chemicals, Inc., 3333 Richmond
Avenue, Houston, TX., 77098. The
petitioner requested that 40 CFR
180.960 be amended by establishing an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of 2-oxepanone,
homopolymer; CAS Reg. No. 24980-414. That notice included a summary of
the petition prepared by the petitioner.
There were no comments in response to
the Notice of Filing.
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish an exemption
from the requirement for a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue,’’ and specifies factors
EPA is to consider in establishing an
exemption.
III. Inert Ingredient Definition
Inert ingredients are all ingredients
that are not active ingredients as defined
in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are
not limited to, the following types of
ingredients (except when they have a
pesticidal efficacy of their own):
Solvents such as alcohols and
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as
polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty
acids; carriers such as clay and
diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as
carrageenan and modified cellulose;
wetting, spreading, and dispersing
agents; propellants in aerosol
dispensers; microencapsulating agents;
and emulsifiers. The term ‘‘inert’’ is not
intended to imply nontoxicity; the
ingredient may or may not be
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
chemically active. Generally, EPA has
exempted inert ingredients from the
requirement of a tolerance based on the
low toxicity of the individual inert
ingredients.
IV. Risk Assessment and Statutory
Findings
EPA establishes exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance only in those
cases where it can be shown that the
risks from aggregate exposure to
pesticide chemical residues under
reasonably foreseeable circumstances
will pose no appreciable risks to human
health. In order to determine the risks
from aggregate exposure to pesticide
inert ingredients, the Agency considers
the toxicity of the inert in conjunction
with possible exposure to residues of
the inert ingredient through food,
drinking water, and through other
exposures that occur as a result of
pesticide use in residential settings. If
EPA is able to determine that a finite
tolerance is not necessary to ensure that
there is a reasonable certainty that no
harm will result from aggregate
exposure to the inert ingredient, an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance may be established.
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D)
of FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other
relevant information in support of this
action and considered its validity,
completeness and reliability, and the
relationship of this information to
human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the
variability of the sensitivities of major
identifiable subgroups of consumers,
including infants and children. In the
case of certain chemical substances that
are defined as polymers, the Agency has
established a set of criteria to identify
categories of polymers that should
present minimal or no risk. The
definition of a polymer is given in 40
CFR 723.250(b) and the exclusion
criteria for identifying these low-risk
polymers are described in 40 CFR
723.250(d). 2-Oxepanone, homopolymer
conforms to the definition of a polymer
given in 40 CFR 723.250(b) and meets
the following criteria that are used to
identify low risk polymers:
1. The polymer is not a cationic
polymer nor is it reasonably anticipated
to become a cationic polymer in a
natural aquatic environment.
2. The polymer does contain as an
integral part of its composition the
atomic elements carbon, hydrogen, and
oxygen.
3. The polymer does not contain as an
integral part of its composition, except
as impurities, any element other than
those listed in 40 CFR 723.250(d)(2)(ii).
E:\FR\FM\04JNR1.SGM
04JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 4, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
4. The polymer is neither designed
nor can it be reasonably anticipated to
substantially degrade, decompose, or
depolymerize.
5. The polymer is manufactured or
imported from monomers and/or
reactants that are already included on
the TSCA Chemical Substance
Inventory or manufactured under an
applicable TSCA section 5 exemption.
6. The polymer is not a water
absorbing polymer with a number
average molecular weight (MW) greater
than or equal to 10,000 daltons.
Additionally, the polymer also meets
as required the following exemption
criteria specified in 40 CFR 723.250(e).
7. The polymer’s number average MW
of 52,000 daltons is greater than or equal
to 10,000 daltons. The polymer contains
less than 2% oligomeric material below
MW 500 and less than 5% oligomeric
material below MW 1,000.
Thus, 2-oxepanone, homopolymer
meets all the criteria for a polymer to be
considered low risk under 40 CFR
723.250. Based on its conformance to
the criteria in this unit, no mammalian
toxicity is anticipated from dietary,
inhalation, or dermal exposure to 2oxepanone, homopolymer.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
V. Aggregate Exposures
For the purposes of assessing
potential exposure under this
exemption, EPA considered that 2oxepanone, homopolymer could be
present in all raw and processed
agricultural commodities and drinking
water, and that non-occupational nondietary exposure was possible. The
number average MW of 2-oxepanone,
homopolymer is 52,000 daltons.
Generally, a polymer of this size would
be poorly absorbed through the intact
gastrointestinal tract or through intact
human skin. Since 2-oxepanone,
homopolymer conform to the criteria
that identify a low-risk polymer, there
are no concerns for risks associated with
any potential exposure scenarios that
are reasonably foreseeable. The Agency
has determined that a tolerance is not
necessary to protect the public health.
VI. Cumulative Effects
Section 408 (b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA
requires that, when considering whether
to establish, modify, or revoke a
tolerance or tolerance exemption, the
Agency consider ‘‘available
information’’ concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular chemical’s
residues and ‘‘other substances that
have a common mechanism of toxicity.’’
EPA does not have, at this time,
available data to determine whether 2oxepanone, homopolymer has a
common mechanism of toxicity with
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:46 Jun 03, 2008
Jkt 214001
other substances. Unlike other
pesticides for which EPA has followed
a cumulative risk approach based on a
common mechanism of toxicity, EPA
has not made a common mechanism of
toxicity finding as to 2-oxepanone,
homopolymer and any other substances
and 2-oxepanone, homopolymer does
not appear to produce a toxic metabolite
produced by other substances. For the
purposes of this tolerance action,
therefore, EPA has not assumed that 2oxepanone, homopolymer has a
common mechanism of toxicity with
other substances. For information
regarding EPA’s efforts to determine
which chemicals have a common
mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate
the cumulative effects of such
chemicals, see the policy statements
released by EPA’s Office of Pesticide
Programs concerning common
mechanism determinations and
procedures for cumulating effects from
substances found to have a common
mechanism on EPA’s website at https://
www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.
VII. Additional Safety Factor for the
Protection of Infants and Children
Section 408 of FFDCA provides that
EPA shall apply an additional tenfold
margin of safety for infants and children
in the case of threshold effects to
account for pre-natal and post-natal
toxicity and the completeness of the
data base unless EPA concludes that a
different margin of safety will be safe for
infants and children. Due to the
expected low toxicity of 2-oxepanone,
homopolymer, EPA has not used a
safety factor analysis to assess the risk.
For the same reasons the additional
tenfold safety factor is unnecessary.
VIII. Determination of Safety
Based on the conformance to the
criteria used to identify a low-risk
polymer, EPA concludes that there is a
reasonable certainty of no harm to the
U.S. population, including infants and
children, from aggregate exposure to
residues of 2-oxepanone, homopolymer.
IX. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required
for enforcement purposes since the
Agency is establishing an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance
without any numerical limitation.
B. International Tolerances
The Agency is not aware of any
country requiring a tolerance for 2oxepanone, homopolymer nor have any
CODEX Maximum Residue Levels
(MRLs) been established for any food
crops at this time.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31755
X. Conclusion
Accordingly, EPA finds that
exempting residues of 2-oxepanone,
homopolymer from the requirement of a
tolerance will be safe.
XI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This final rule establishes a tolerance
under section 408(d) of FFDCA in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled Regulatory
Planning and Review (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this rule has
been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This final rule does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order
12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates
growers, food processors, food handlers,
and food retailers, not States or tribes,
nor does this action alter the
relationships or distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such,
the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct
effect on States or tribal governments,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled Consultation and Coordination
E:\FR\FM\04JNR1.SGM
04JNR1
31756
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 4, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
to this rule. In addition, This rule does
not impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
(Public Law 104–4).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report to each House of
the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of this rule in the Federal
Register. This rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: May 12, 2008.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
I
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In §180.960, the table is amended
by adding alphabetically the following
polymer to read as follows:
I
§ 180.960 Polymers; exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance.
*
*
*
*
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Polymer
CAS No.
*
*
*
*
2-oxepanone, homopolymer, minimum number average molecular weight (in amu) 52,000.
*
*
*
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:46 Jun 03, 2008
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 261 and 302
[EPA–HQ–RCRA–2006–0984, FRL–8575–4]
RIN 2050–AG15
Hazardous Waste Management
System: Identification and Listing of
Hazardous Waste; Amendment to
Hazardous Waste Code F019
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
XII. Congressional Review Act
*
[FR Doc. E8–11980 Filed 6–3–08; 8:45 am]
*
2498041-4
*
Jkt 214001
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is amending the list of
hazardous wastes from non-specific
sources (called F-wastes) by modifying
the scope of the EPA Hazardous Waste
No. F019 (Wastewater treatment sludges
from the chemical conversion coating of
aluminum except from zirconium
phosphating in aluminum can washing
when such phosphating is an exclusive
conversion coating process). The
Agency is amending the F019 listing to
exempt wastewater treatment sludges
from zinc phosphating, when such
phosphating is used in the motor
vehicle manufacturing process,
provided that the wastes are not placed
outside on the land prior to shipment to
a landfill for disposal, and the wastes
are placed in landfill units that are
subject to or meet the specified landfill
design criteria. This final action on the
F019 listing does not affect any other
wastewater treatment sludges either
from the chemical conversion coating of
aluminum, or from other industrial
sources. Additionally, this rule amends
the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) list of Hazardous
Substances and Reportable Quantities so
that the F019 listing description is
consistent with the amendment to F019
under regulations for hazardous wastes
from non-specific sources.
DATES: This final rule is effective on July
7, 2008.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–RCRA–2006–0984. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the OSWER Docket in the EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room
3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460. The EPA/DC
Public Reading Room is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Reading Room
is (202) 566–1744 and the telephone
number for the RCRA Docket is (202)
566–0270.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general information, review our Web
site at https://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/
hazwaste. For information on specific
aspects of the rule, contact James
Michael of the Office of Solid Waste
(5304P), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20460, (E-mail
address and telephone number:
michael.james@epa.gov, (703) 308–
8610).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
General Information
Who Is Potentially Affected by This
Final Rule?
This final rule could directly affect
businesses that generate certain wastes
from the manufacturing of motor
vehicles in the (1) automobile
manufacturing industry and (2) light
truck/utility vehicle manufacturing
industry (NAICS codes 336111 and
336112, respectively). Other motor
vehicle manufacturing industries (e.g.,
heavy duty truck or motor home
manufacturing) are not affected by this
rule. The wastes affected by this final
rule are wastewater treatment sludges
generated from the chemical conversion
coating of aluminum using a zinc
phosphating process and are currently
listed as EPA Hazardous Waste No.
F019 (see 40 CFR 261.31). These wastes
will not be subject to the F019 listing,
provided the wastes are not placed
outside on the land prior to the
shipment to a landfill for disposal and
are either: disposed in a Subtitle D
municipal or industrial landfill unit that
is equipped with a single clay liner and
is permitted, licensed or otherwise
authorized by the state; or disposed in
a landfill unit subject to, or otherwise
meeting, the landfill requirements in
§ 258.40, § 264.301, or § 265.301.
Impacts on potentially affected entities
are summarized in Section VI of this
Preamble. The ‘‘Regulatory Impact
Analysis’’ (RIA) for this action presents
an analysis of potentially affected
entities and is available in the docket
E:\FR\FM\04JNR1.SGM
04JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 108 (Wednesday, June 4, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31753-31756]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-11980]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0096; FRL-8362-8]
2-Oxepanone, homopolymer; Tolerance Exemption
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance for residues of 2-oxepanone, homopolymer; (CAS Reg. No.
24980-41-4) when used as an inert ingredient in a pesticide chemical
formulation. Solvay Chemicals, Inc. submitted a petition to EPA under
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as amended by the
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA) requesting an exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level for residues of 2-oxepanone,
homopolymer.
DATES: This regulation is effective June 4, 2008. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before August 4, 2008, and
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0096. To access the
electronic docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, select ``Advanced
Search,'' then ``Docket Search.'' Insert the docket ID number where
indicated and select the ``Submit'' button. Follow the instructions on
the regulations.gov website to view the docket index or access
available documents. All documents in the docket are listed in the
docket index available in regulations.gov. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at https://www.regulations.gov, or,
if only available in hard copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in
Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr.,
Arlington, VA. The Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility
telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Samek, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number: (703) 347-8825; e-mail address: samek.karen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does This Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. To determine
whether you or your business may be affected by this action, you should
carefully examine the applicability provisions in Unit II. If you have
any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of This Document?
In addition to accessing an electronic copy of this Federal
Register document
[[Page 31754]]
through the electronic docket at https://www.regulations.gov, you may
access this ``Federal Register'' document electronically through the
EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register'' listings at https://
www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may also access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the Government Printing
Office's pilot e-CFR site at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing Request?
Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, as amended by FQPA, any person may
file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request
a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural regulations which
govern the submission of objections and requests for hearings appear in
40 CFR part 178. You must file your objection or request a hearing on
this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0096 in the subject line on the first page of
your submission. All requests must be in writing, and must be mailed or
delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or before August 4, 2008.
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public
docket that is described in ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit your copies, identified by docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0096, by one of the following methods.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of March 12, 2008 (73 FR 13225) (FRL-8354-
6), EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408 of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C.
346a, as amended by FQPA (Public Law 104-170), announcing the filing of
a pesticide petition (PP 8E7321) by Solvay Chemicals, Inc., 3333
Richmond Avenue, Houston, TX., 77098. The petitioner requested that 40
CFR 180.960 be amended by establishing an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance for residues of 2-oxepanone, homopolymer;
CAS Reg. No. 24980-41-4. That notice included a summary of the petition
prepared by the petitioner. There were no comments in response to the
Notice of Filing.
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue,
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through
drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the
pesticide chemical residue in establishing an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue,'' and specifies
factors EPA is to consider in establishing an exemption.
III. Inert Ingredient Definition
Inert ingredients are all ingredients that are not active
ingredients as defined in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are not
limited to, the following types of ingredients (except when they have a
pesticidal efficacy of their own): Solvents such as alcohols and
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty
acids; carriers such as clay and diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as
carrageenan and modified cellulose; wetting, spreading, and dispersing
agents; propellants in aerosol dispensers; microencapsulating agents;
and emulsifiers. The term ``inert'' is not intended to imply
nontoxicity; the ingredient may or may not be chemically active.
Generally, EPA has exempted inert ingredients from the requirement of a
tolerance based on the low toxicity of the individual inert
ingredients.
IV. Risk Assessment and Statutory Findings
EPA establishes exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance only
in those cases where it can be shown that the risks from aggregate
exposure to pesticide chemical residues under reasonably foreseeable
circumstances will pose no appreciable risks to human health. In order
to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to pesticide inert
ingredients, the Agency considers the toxicity of the inert in
conjunction with possible exposure to residues of the inert ingredient
through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as
a result of pesticide use in residential settings. If EPA is able to
determine that a finite tolerance is not necessary to ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate
exposure to the inert ingredient, an exemption from the requirement of
a tolerance may be established.
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other relevant information in support of
this action and considered its validity, completeness and reliability,
and the relationship of this information to human risk. EPA has also
considered available information concerning the variability of the
sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including
infants and children. In the case of certain chemical substances that
are defined as polymers, the Agency has established a set of criteria
to identify categories of polymers that should present minimal or no
risk. The definition of a polymer is given in 40 CFR 723.250(b) and the
exclusion criteria for identifying these low-risk polymers are
described in 40 CFR 723.250(d). 2-Oxepanone, homopolymer conforms to
the definition of a polymer given in 40 CFR 723.250(b) and meets the
following criteria that are used to identify low risk polymers:
1. The polymer is not a cationic polymer nor is it reasonably
anticipated to become a cationic polymer in a natural aquatic
environment.
2. The polymer does contain as an integral part of its composition
the atomic elements carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen.
3. The polymer does not contain as an integral part of its
composition, except as impurities, any element other than those listed
in 40 CFR 723.250(d)(2)(ii).
[[Page 31755]]
4. The polymer is neither designed nor can it be reasonably
anticipated to substantially degrade, decompose, or depolymerize.
5. The polymer is manufactured or imported from monomers and/or
reactants that are already included on the TSCA Chemical Substance
Inventory or manufactured under an applicable TSCA section 5 exemption.
6. The polymer is not a water absorbing polymer with a number
average molecular weight (MW) greater than or equal to 10,000 daltons.
Additionally, the polymer also meets as required the following
exemption criteria specified in 40 CFR 723.250(e).
7. The polymer's number average MW of 52,000 daltons is greater
than or equal to 10,000 daltons. The polymer contains less than 2%
oligomeric material below MW 500 and less than 5% oligomeric material
below MW 1,000.
Thus, 2-oxepanone, homopolymer meets all the criteria for a polymer
to be considered low risk under 40 CFR 723.250. Based on its
conformance to the criteria in this unit, no mammalian toxicity is
anticipated from dietary, inhalation, or dermal exposure to 2-
oxepanone, homopolymer.
V. Aggregate Exposures
For the purposes of assessing potential exposure under this
exemption, EPA considered that 2-oxepanone, homopolymer could be
present in all raw and processed agricultural commodities and drinking
water, and that non-occupational non-dietary exposure was possible. The
number average MW of 2-oxepanone, homopolymer is 52,000 daltons.
Generally, a polymer of this size would be poorly absorbed through the
intact gastrointestinal tract or through intact human skin. Since 2-
oxepanone, homopolymer conform to the criteria that identify a low-risk
polymer, there are no concerns for risks associated with any potential
exposure scenarios that are reasonably foreseeable. The Agency has
determined that a tolerance is not necessary to protect the public
health.
VI. Cumulative Effects
Section 408 (b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when considering
whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance or tolerance
exemption, the Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the
cumulative effects of a particular chemical's residues and ``other
substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.'' EPA does not
have, at this time, available data to determine whether 2-oxepanone,
homopolymer has a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances.
Unlike other pesticides for which EPA has followed a cumulative risk
approach based on a common mechanism of toxicity, EPA has not made a
common mechanism of toxicity finding as to 2-oxepanone, homopolymer and
any other substances and 2-oxepanone, homopolymer does not appear to
produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For the
purposes of this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has not assumed that
2-oxepanone, homopolymer has a common mechanism of toxicity with other
substances. For information regarding EPA's efforts to determine which
chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the
cumulative effects of such chemicals, see the policy statements
released by EPA's Office of Pesticide Programs concerning common
mechanism determinations and procedures for cumulating effects from
substances found to have a common mechanism on EPA's website at https://
www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.
VII. Additional Safety Factor for the Protection of Infants and
Children
Section 408 of FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply an additional
tenfold margin of safety for infants and children in the case of
threshold effects to account for pre-natal and post-natal toxicity and
the completeness of the data base unless EPA concludes that a different
margin of safety will be safe for infants and children. Due to the
expected low toxicity of 2-oxepanone, homopolymer, EPA has not used a
safety factor analysis to assess the risk. For the same reasons the
additional tenfold safety factor is unnecessary.
VIII. Determination of Safety
Based on the conformance to the criteria used to identify a low-
risk polymer, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty of no
harm to the U.S. population, including infants and children, from
aggregate exposure to residues of 2-oxepanone, homopolymer.
IX. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since
the Agency is establishing an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance without any numerical limitation.
B. International Tolerances
The Agency is not aware of any country requiring a tolerance for 2-
oxepanone, homopolymer nor have any CODEX Maximum Residue Levels (MRLs)
been established for any food crops at this time.
X. Conclusion
Accordingly, EPA finds that exempting residues of 2-oxepanone,
homopolymer from the requirement of a tolerance will be safe.
XI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This final rule establishes a tolerance under section 408(d) of
FFDCA in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this rule has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355,
May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children
from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April
23, 1997). This final rule does not contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require any special considerations
under Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as the tolerance in
this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
Consultation and Coordination
[[Page 31756]]
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) do not
apply to this rule. In addition, This rule does not impose any
enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law
104-4).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272
note).
XII. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to
the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the
United States prior to publication of this rule in the Federal
Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: May 12, 2008.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
0
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.960, the table is amended by adding alphabetically the
following polymer to read as follows:
Sec. 180.960 Polymers; exemptions from the requirement of a
tolerance.
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Polymer CAS No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
2-oxepanone, homopolymer, minimum number 24980-41-4
average molecular weight (in amu) 52,000.
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. E8-11980 Filed 6-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S