Parks, Recreation Areas, Wildlife and Waterfowl Refuges, and Historic Sites; Correction, 31609-31610 [E8-12360]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 3, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Class E airspace areas extending
upward from 700 feet or more above the
surface of the earth are published in
Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9R,
signed August 1, 2007, and effective
September 15, 2007, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1.
The Class E airspace designations
listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on May 20, 2008.
Joseph R. Yadouga,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. E8–12026 Filed 6–2–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Federal Transit Administration
23 CFR Part 774
RIN 2125–AF14
RIN 2132–AA83
Parks, Recreation Areas, Wildlife and
Waterfowl Refuges, and Historic Sites;
Correction
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), Federal
Transit Administration (FTA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Correcting amendment.
AGENCIES:
SUMMARY: This rule makes a technical
correction to the final regulations,
which were published in the Federal
Register on Wednesday, March 12,
2008, that govern Section 4(f) approvals
for the FHWA and the FTA. The
amendment contained herein makes no
substantive change to the FHWA or the
FTA regulations, policies, or
procedures. This rule clarifies an
ambiguity in the language of the
regulatory text caused by a global word
change implemented in the Final Rule
as a result of comments received in
response to the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking.
DATES:
This rule is effective July 3,
2008.
For
FHWA, Diane Mobley, Office of the
Chief Counsel, (202) 366–1366; or
Lamar Smith, Office of Project
Development and Environmental
Review, (202) 366–8994. For FTA,
Joseph Ossi, Office of Planning and
Environment, (202) 366–1613; or
Christopher VanWyk, Office of the Chief
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with RULES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:50 Jun 02, 2008
Jkt 214001
31609
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest. The FHWA and the FTA find
that notice and comment for this rule is
unnecessary and contrary to the public
interest because it will have no
substantive impact, is technical in
nature, and relates only to management,
organization, procedure, and practice.
The FHWA and the FTA do not
Electronic Access
anticipate receiving meaningful
An electronic copy of this document
comments on it. States, local
may be downloaded by using a
governments, transit agencies, and their
computer, modem and suitable
consultants rely upon the
communications software from the
environmental regulations corrected by
Government Printing Office’s Electronic this action. These corrections will
Bulletin Board Service at (202) 512–
reduce confusion for these entities and
1661. Internet users may reach the
should not be unnecessarily delayed.
Office of the Federal Register’s home
Accordingly, for the reasons listed
page at: https://www.archives.gov and the above, the agencies find good cause
Government Printing Office’s Web page
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) to waive
at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara.
notice and opportunity for comment.
Counsel, (202) 366–1733. Both agencies
are located at 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., Washington, DC 20590. Office
hours for the FHWA are from 7:45 a.m.
to 4:15 p.m., e.t., and for the FTA are
from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This rule makes a technical correction
to the regulations that govern Section
4(f) approval procedures for the FHWA
and the FTA found at 23 CFR part 774.
In its final rule published in the Federal
Register on March 12, 2008, at 73 FR
13368, the FHWA and FTA replaced the
phrase ‘‘feasible and prudent project
alternative’’ with the phrase ‘‘feasible
and prudent avoidance alternative’’ to
clarify that the statute requires a
determination whether a feasible and
prudent alternative exists that avoids
using a Section 4(f) property. This
phrase was globally replaced throughout
the final rule. However, where this
phrase was replaced in section 774.3(c),
the new phraseology could be
misinterpreted to require consideration
of the already rejected, infeasible, or
imprudent avoidance alternatives a
second time. The preamble and
regulatory text of the NPRM, and the
preamble of the final rule, make clear
that the intent of section 774.3(c) is to
provide direction for how to analyze
and select an alternative when it has
been determined that no feasible and
prudent avoidance alternatives exist and
all viable alternatives use some Section
4(f) property. In order to correct the
error caused by the global phrase
change, and to clarify the intent of
section 774.3(c) as noted in the
preamble to the final rule, the FHWA
and FTA have added the phrase ‘‘from
among the remaining alternatives that
use Section 4(f) property’’ to the
regulatory text of section 774.3(c).
Rulemaking Analyses and Notice
Under the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. 553(b)), an agency may
waive the normal notice and comment
requirements if it finds, for good cause,
that they are impracticable,
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review) and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
The FHWA and the FTA have
determined that this action is not a
significant regulatory action within the
meaning of Executive Order 12866 or
significant within the meaning of U.S.
Department of Transportation regulatory
policies and procedures. It is
anticipated that the economic impact of
this rulemaking will be minimal. This
rule only entails minor corrections that
will not in any way alter the regulatory
effect of 23 CFR part 774. Thus, this
final rule will not adversely affect, in a
material way, any sector of the
economy. In addition, these changes
will not interfere with any action taken
or planned by another agency and will
not materially alter the budgetary
impact of any entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In compliance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96–354, 5 U.S.C.
601–612) the FHWA and the FTA have
evaluated the effects of this action on
small entities and have determined that
the action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This final rule
will not make any substantive changes
to our regulations or in the way that our
regulations affect small entities; it
merely corrects technical errors. For this
reason, the FHWA and the FTA certify
that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This rule does not impose unfunded
mandates as defined by the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
E:\FR\FM\03JNR1.SGM
03JNR1
31610
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 3, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
104–4, March 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 48).
This rule does not impose any
requirements on State, local, or tribal
governments, or the private sector and,
thus, will not require those entities to
expend any funds.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
This action has been analyzed in
accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13132, and the FHWA and the FTA
have determined that this action does
not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation
of a federalism assessment. The FHWA
and the FTA have also determined that
this action does not preempt any State
law or State regulation or affect the
States’ ability to discharge traditional
State governmental functions.
Executive Order 12372
(Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to
these programs.
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Children)
Under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health and Safety Risks,
this final rule is not economically
significant and does not involve an
environmental risk to health and safety
that may disproportionally affect
children.
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of
Private Property)
This final rule will not effect a taking
of private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
This action does not create any new
information collection requirements for
which a Paperwork Reduction Act
submission to the Office of Management
and Budget would be needed under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.
This final rule has been analyzed
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. The FHWA and
FTA have determined that it is not a
significant energy action under that
order because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866 and this final rule is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy.
National Environmental Policy Act
Regulation Identification Number
Paperwork Reduction Act
The FHWA and the FTA have
analyzed this action for the purpose of
the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4347) and have
determined that this action will not
have any effect on the quality of the
environment.
Executive Order 13175 (Tribal
Consultation)
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with RULES
The FHWA and FTA have analyzed
this action under Executive Order
13175, dated November 6, 2000, and
concluded that this rule will not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes; will not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian tribal government; and will not
preempt tribal law. There are no
requirements set forth in this rule that
directly affect one or more Indian tribes.
Therefore, a tribal summary impact
statement is not required.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice
Reform)
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:50 Jun 02, 2008
Jkt 214001
A regulation identification number
(RIN) is assigned to each regulatory
action listed in the Unified Agenda of
Federal Regulations. The Regulatory
Information Service Center publishes
the Unified Agenda in April and
October of each year. The RINs
contained in the heading of this
document can be used to cross reference
this action with the Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects in 23 CFR Part 774
Environmental protection, Grant
programs—transportation, Highways
and roads, Historic preservation, Public
lands, Recreation areas, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Issued on: May 27, 2008.
James D. Ray,
Acting Federal Highway Administrator.
James S. Simpson,
FTA Administrator.
In consideration of the foregoing, 23
CFR part 774 is amended as set forth
below.
I
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Federal Highway Administration
Title 23—Highways
PART 774—PARKS, RECREATION
AREAS, WILDLIFE AND WATERFOWL
REFUGES, AND HISTORIC SITES
(SECTION 4(F))
1. The authority citation for part 774
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 103(c), 109(h), 138,
325, 326, 327 and 204(h)(2); 49 U.S.C. 303;
Section 6009 of the Safe, Accountable,
Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act:
A Legacy for Users (Pub. L. 109–59, Aug. 10,
2005, 119 Stat. 1144); 49 CFR 1.48 and 1.51.
2. Amend § 774.3 by revising
paragraph (c) introductory text to read
as follows:
I
§ 774.3
Section 4(f) approvals.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) If the analysis in paragraph (a)(1)
of this section concludes that there is no
feasible and prudent avoidance
alternative, then the Administration
may approve, from among the remaining
alternatives that use Section 4(f)
property, only the alternative that:
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–12360 Filed 6–2–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[USCG–2008–0337]
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Arthur Kill, Staten Island, NY and
Elizabeth, NJ
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations; request for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commander, First Coast
Guard District, has issued a new
temporary deviation from the regulation
governing the operation of the Arthur
Kill (AK) Railroad Bridge across Arthur
Kill at mile 11.6 between Staten Island,
New York and Elizabeth, New Jersey.
This deviation is necessary to test a new
operating rule for the bridge that will
help determine the most equitable and
safe solution to facilitate the present and
anticipated needs of navigation and rail
traffic. This deviation requires the AK
Railroad Bridge to remain in the open
position but allows the bridge owner/
operator to schedule bridge closure
periods after consultation with the
marine community.
E:\FR\FM\03JNR1.SGM
03JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 107 (Tuesday, June 3, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31609-31610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-12360]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Federal Transit Administration
23 CFR Part 774
RIN 2125-AF14
RIN 2132-AA83
Parks, Recreation Areas, Wildlife and Waterfowl Refuges, and
Historic Sites; Correction
AGENCIES: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit
Administration (FTA), Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Correcting amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule makes a technical correction to the final
regulations, which were published in the Federal Register on Wednesday,
March 12, 2008, that govern Section 4(f) approvals for the FHWA and the
FTA. The amendment contained herein makes no substantive change to the
FHWA or the FTA regulations, policies, or procedures. This rule
clarifies an ambiguity in the language of the regulatory text caused by
a global word change implemented in the Final Rule as a result of
comments received in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
DATES: This rule is effective July 3, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For FHWA, Diane Mobley, Office of the
Chief Counsel, (202) 366-1366; or Lamar Smith, Office of Project
Development and Environmental Review, (202) 366-8994. For FTA, Joseph
Ossi, Office of Planning and Environment, (202) 366-1613; or
Christopher VanWyk, Office of the Chief Counsel, (202) 366-1733. Both
agencies are located at 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590. Office hours for the FHWA are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m., e.t.,
and for the FTA are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded by using a
computer, modem and suitable communications software from the
Government Printing Office's Electronic Bulletin Board Service at (202)
512-1661. Internet users may reach the Office of the Federal Register's
home page at: https://www.archives.gov and the Government Printing
Office's Web page at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara.
Background
This rule makes a technical correction to the regulations that
govern Section 4(f) approval procedures for the FHWA and the FTA found
at 23 CFR part 774. In its final rule published in the Federal Register
on March 12, 2008, at 73 FR 13368, the FHWA and FTA replaced the phrase
``feasible and prudent project alternative'' with the phrase ``feasible
and prudent avoidance alternative'' to clarify that the statute
requires a determination whether a feasible and prudent alternative
exists that avoids using a Section 4(f) property. This phrase was
globally replaced throughout the final rule. However, where this phrase
was replaced in section 774.3(c), the new phraseology could be
misinterpreted to require consideration of the already rejected,
infeasible, or imprudent avoidance alternatives a second time. The
preamble and regulatory text of the NPRM, and the preamble of the final
rule, make clear that the intent of section 774.3(c) is to provide
direction for how to analyze and select an alternative when it has been
determined that no feasible and prudent avoidance alternatives exist
and all viable alternatives use some Section 4(f) property. In order to
correct the error caused by the global phrase change, and to clarify
the intent of section 774.3(c) as noted in the preamble to the final
rule, the FHWA and FTA have added the phrase ``from among the remaining
alternatives that use Section 4(f) property'' to the regulatory text of
section 774.3(c).
Rulemaking Analyses and Notice
Under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553(b)), an agency
may waive the normal notice and comment requirements if it finds, for
good cause, that they are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to
the public interest. The FHWA and the FTA find that notice and comment
for this rule is unnecessary and contrary to the public interest
because it will have no substantive impact, is technical in nature, and
relates only to management, organization, procedure, and practice. The
FHWA and the FTA do not anticipate receiving meaningful comments on it.
States, local governments, transit agencies, and their consultants rely
upon the environmental regulations corrected by this action. These
corrections will reduce confusion for these entities and should not be
unnecessarily delayed. Accordingly, for the reasons listed above, the
agencies find good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) to waive notice
and opportunity for comment.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
The FHWA and the FTA have determined that this action is not a
significant regulatory action within the meaning of Executive Order
12866 or significant within the meaning of U.S. Department of
Transportation regulatory policies and procedures. It is anticipated
that the economic impact of this rulemaking will be minimal. This rule
only entails minor corrections that will not in any way alter the
regulatory effect of 23 CFR part 774. Thus, this final rule will not
adversely affect, in a material way, any sector of the economy. In
addition, these changes will not interfere with any action taken or
planned by another agency and will not materially alter the budgetary
impact of any entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354,
5 U.S.C. 601-612) the FHWA and the FTA have evaluated the effects of
this action on small entities and have determined that the action will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This final rule will not make any substantive changes to our
regulations or in the way that our regulations affect small entities;
it merely corrects technical errors. For this reason, the FHWA and the
FTA certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule does not impose unfunded mandates as defined by the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
[[Page 31610]]
104-4, March 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 48). This rule does not impose any
requirements on State, local, or tribal governments, or the private
sector and, thus, will not require those entities to expend any funds.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
This action has been analyzed in accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order 13132, and the FHWA and the FTA
have determined that this action does not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism assessment. The
FHWA and the FTA have also determined that this action does not preempt
any State law or State regulation or affect the States' ability to
discharge traditional State governmental functions.
Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities apply
to these programs.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not create any new information collection
requirements for which a Paperwork Reduction Act submission to the
Office of Management and Budget would be needed under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.
National Environmental Policy Act
The FHWA and the FTA have analyzed this action for the purpose of
the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4347) and
have determined that this action will not have any effect on the
quality of the environment.
Executive Order 13175 (Tribal Consultation)
The FHWA and FTA have analyzed this action under Executive Order
13175, dated November 6, 2000, and concluded that this rule will not
have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes; will not
impose substantial direct compliance costs on Indian tribal government;
and will not preempt tribal law. There are no requirements set forth in
this rule that directly affect one or more Indian tribes. Therefore, a
tribal summary impact statement is not required.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children)
Under Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from
Environmental Health and Safety Risks, this final rule is not
economically significant and does not involve an environmental risk to
health and safety that may disproportionally affect children.
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of Private Property)
This final rule will not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
This final rule has been analyzed under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. The FHWA and FTA have determined that it is not a
significant energy action under that order because it is not a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866 and this
final rule is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy.
Regulation Identification Number
A regulation identification number (RIN) is assigned to each
regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations.
The Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda
in April and October of each year. The RINs contained in the heading of
this document can be used to cross reference this action with the
Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects in 23 CFR Part 774
Environmental protection, Grant programs--transportation, Highways
and roads, Historic preservation, Public lands, Recreation areas,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Issued on: May 27, 2008.
James D. Ray,
Acting Federal Highway Administrator.
James S. Simpson,
FTA Administrator.
0
In consideration of the foregoing, 23 CFR part 774 is amended as set
forth below.
Federal Highway Administration
Title 23--Highways
PART 774--PARKS, RECREATION AREAS, WILDLIFE AND WATERFOWL REFUGES,
AND HISTORIC SITES (SECTION 4(F))
0
1. The authority citation for part 774 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 103(c), 109(h), 138, 325, 326, 327 and
204(h)(2); 49 U.S.C. 303; Section 6009 of the Safe, Accountable,
Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users
(Pub. L. 109-59, Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1144); 49 CFR 1.48 and
1.51.
0
2. Amend Sec. 774.3 by revising paragraph (c) introductory text to
read as follows:
Sec. 774.3 Section 4(f) approvals.
* * * * *
(c) If the analysis in paragraph (a)(1) of this section concludes
that there is no feasible and prudent avoidance alternative, then the
Administration may approve, from among the remaining alternatives that
use Section 4(f) property, only the alternative that:
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-12360 Filed 6-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P