Notice of Indirect Cost Rates for the Damage Assessment, Remediation, and Restoration Program for Fiscal Year 2006, 31679-31680 [E8-12303]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 3, 2008 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
J. Terry Lynch, National Institute of
Standards and Technology, Office of
Technology Partnerships, 100 Bureau
Drive, Stop 2200, Gaithersburg, MD
20899, Phone 301–975–2691.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
prospective exclusive license will be
royalty bearing and will comply with
the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C.
209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective
exclusive license may be granted unless,
within thirty days from the date of this
published Notice, NIST receives written
evidence and argument which establish
that the grant of the license would not
be consistent with the requirements of
35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The
availability of the invention for
licensing was published in the Federal
Register on February 16, 2000.
U.S. Patent No. 6,168,755 is owned by
the U.S. government, as represented by
the Secretary of Commerce. The patent
involves a high nitrogen stainless steel
alloy and alloy powder comprising
chromium (Cr), molybdenum (Mo),
manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), nitrogen
(N) and iron (Fe). The composition of
the stainless steel alloy and powder
comprises between about 27 and about
30% by weight Cr, between about 1.5
and about 4.0% by weight Mo, Mn
present and is present in an amount up
to 15% by weight, at least about 8% by
weight Ni, and about 0.8 to about 0.97%
by weight N with the balance being iron.
It has been discovered that forming an
alloy of this chemistry using nitrogen
gas atomization process, followed by a
consolidation process, the alloy is less
likely to form detrimental ferrite, stable
nitride and sigma (.sigma.) phases,
without the need for further processing,
such as solution treating and quenching.
This allows for the formation of
stainless steel articles having a thicker
cross-section with reduced processing
cost.
Dated: May 28, 2008.
Richard F. Kayser,
Chief Scientist.
[FR Doc. E8–12400 Filed 6–2–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Notice of Indirect Cost Rates for the
Damage Assessment, Remediation,
and Restoration Program for Fiscal
Year 2006
SUMMARY: The National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration’s
(NOAA’s) Damage Assessment,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:07 Jun 02, 2008
Jkt 214001
Remediation, and Restoration Program
(DARRP) is announcing new indirect
cost rates on the recovery of indirect
costs for its component organizations
involved in natural resource damage
assessment and restoration activities for
fiscal year (FY) 2006. The indirect cost
rates for this fiscal year and dates of
implementation are provided in this
notice. More information on these rates
and the DARRP policy can be found at
the DARRP Web site at https://
www.darrp.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information, contact LaTonya
Burgess at 301–713–4248, ext. 211, by
fax at 301–713–4389, or e-mail at
LaTonya.Burgess@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
mission of the DARRP is to restore
natural resource injuries caused by
releases of hazardous substances or oil
under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.), the
Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA) (33
U.S.C. 2701 et seq.), and support
restoration of physical injuries to
National Marine Sanctuary resources
under the National Marine Sanctuaries
Act (NMSA) (16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.).
The DARRP consists of three component
organizations: the Office of Response
and Restoration (ORR) within the
National Ocean Service; the Restoration
Center within the National Marine
Fisheries Service; and the Office of the
General Counsel for Natural Resources
(GCNR). The DARRP conducts Natural
Resource Damage Assessments (NRDAs)
as a basis for recovering damages from
responsible parties, and uses the funds
recovered to restore injured natural
resources.
Consistent with Federal accounting
requirements, the DARRP is required to
account for and report the full costs of
its programs and activities. Further, the
DARRP is authorized by law to recover
reasonable costs of damage assessment
and restoration activities under
CERCLA, OPA, and the NMSA. Within
the constraints of these legal provisions
and their regulatory applications, the
DARRP has the discretion to develop
indirect cost rates for its component
organizations and formulate policies on
the recovery of indirect cost rates
subject to its requirements.
The DARRP’s Indirect Cost Effort
In December 1998, the DARRP hired
the public accounting firm Rubino &
McGeehin, Chartered (R&M) to: Evaluate
cost accounting system and allocation
practices; recommend the appropriate
indirect cost allocation methodology;
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31679
and determine the indirect cost rates for
the three organizations that comprise
the DARRP. A Federal Register notice
on R&M’s effort, their assessment of the
DARRP’s cost accounting system and
practice, and their determination
regarding the most appropriate indirect
cost methodology and rates for FYs 1993
through 1999 was published on
December 7, 2000 (65 FR 76611). The
notice and report by R&M can also be
found on the DARRP Web site at
https://www.darrp.noaa.gov.
R&M continued its assessment of
DARRP’s indirect cost rate system and
structure for FYs 2000 and 2001. A
second federal notice specifying the
DARRP indirect rates for FYs 2000 and
2001 was published on December 2,
2002 (67 FR 71537).
In October 2002, DARRP hired the
accounting firm of Cotton and Company
LLP (Cotton) to review and certify
DARRP costs incurred on cases for
purposes of cost recovery and to
develop indirect rates for FY 2002 and
subsequent years. As in the prior years,
Cotton concluded that the cost
accounting system and allocation
practices of the DARRP component
organizations are consistent with
Federal accounting requirements.
Consistent with R&M’s previous
analyses, Cotton also determined that
the most appropriate indirect allocation
method continues to be the Direct Labor
Cost Base for all three DARRP
component organizations. The Direct
Labor Cost Base is computed by
allocating total indirect cost over the
sum of direct labor dollars plus the
application of NOAA’s leave surcharge
and benefits rates to direct labor. Direct
labor costs for contractors from I.M.
Systems Group (IMSG) were included in
the direct labor base because Cotton
determined that these costs have the
same relationship to the indirect cost
pool as NOAA direct labor costs. IMSG
provided on-site support to the DARRP
in the areas of injury assessment,
natural resource economics, restoration
planning and implementation, and
policy analysis. IMSG continues to
provide on-site support to the DARRP.
A third federal notice specifying the
DARRP indirect rates for FY 2002 was
published on October 6, 2003 (68 FR
57672), a fourth notice for the FY 2003
indirect cost rates appeared on May 20,
2005 (70 FR 29280), and a fifth notice
for the FY 2004 indirect cost rates was
published on March 16, 2006 (71 FR
13356). The last notice for the FY 2005
indirect cost rates was published on
February 9, 2007 (72 FR 6221). Cotton’s
reports on these indirect rates can also
be found on the DARRP Web site at
https://www.darrp.noaa.gov.
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
31680
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 3, 2008 / Notices
Cotton reaffirmed that the Direct
Labor Cost Base is the most appropriate
indirect allocation method for the
development of the FY 2006 indirect
cost rates.
The DARRP’s Indirect Cost Rates and
Policies
The DARRP will apply the indirect
cost rates for FY 2006 as recommended
by Cotton for each of the DARRP
component organizations as provided in
the following table:
FY 2006
Indirect
Rate
(%)
DARP Component Organization
Office of Response and Restoration (ORR) ............................................................................................................................................
Restoration Center (RC) ..........................................................................................................................................................................
General Counsel for Natural Resources (GCNR) ...................................................................................................................................
These rates are based on the Direct
Labor Cost Base allocation methodology.
The FY 2006 rates will be applied to
all damage assessment and restoration
case costs incurred between October 1,
2005 and September 30, 2006. DARRP
will use the FY 2006 indirect cost rates
for future fiscal years until subsequent
year-specific rates can be developed.
For cases that have settled and for
cost claims paid prior to the effective
date of the fiscal year in question, the
DARRP will not re-open any resolved
matters for the purpose of applying the
revised rates in this policy for these
fiscal years. For cases not settled and
cost claims not paid prior to the
effective date of the fiscal year in
question, costs will be recalculated
using the revised rates in this policy for
these fiscal years. Where a responsible
party has agreed to pay costs using
previous year’s indirect rates, but has
not yet made the payment because the
settlement documents are not finalized,
the costs will not be recalculated.
130.99
128.04
122.01
The DARRP indirect cost rate policies
and procedures published in the
Federal Register on December 7, 2000
(65 FR 76611), on December 2, 2002 (67
FR. 71537), October 6, 2003 (68 FR
57672), May 20, 2005 (70 Fed. Reg.
29280), March 16, 2006 (71 FR 13356),
and February 9, 2007 (72 FR 6221)
remain in effect except as updated by
this notice. To summarize, the DARRP
indirect rates for the last five fiscal years
(beginning October 1 and ending
September 30) are:
DARRP Component Organization
FY 02
(%)
FY 03
(%)
FY 04
(%)
FY 05
(%)
FY 06
(%)
Damage Assessment Center .......................................................................................
Office of Response and Restoration ...........................................................................
Restoration Center .......................................................................................................
General Counsel for Natural Resources .....................................................................
254.17
................
218.36
251.75
261.96
................
223.74
206.47
213.03
................
181.46
165.39
................
180.42
166.70
169.59
................
130.99
128.04
122.01
Dated: May 22, 2008.
David Westerholm,
Director, Office of Response and Restoration,
National Ocean Service, National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–12303 Filed 6–2–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–JE–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XI19
Notice of Public Meeting for the Joint
Subcommittee on Aquaculture
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting for the
Joint Subcommittee on Aquaculture of
the Committee on Science National
Science and Technology Council.
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
schedule and proposed agenda for a
meeting of the Joint Subcommittee on
Aquaculture (JSA) of the Committee on
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:18 Jun 02, 2008
Jkt 214001
Science of the National Science and
Technology Council. The JSA serves as
the Federal interagency coordinating
body to increase the overall
effectiveness and productivity of
Federal research, technology transfer,
and assistance programs in support of a
globally competitive, technologically
advanced, and environmentally sound
aquaculture industry in the United
States. The meeting provides an
opportunity for the subcommittee to
discuss ongoing and planned activities
in support of aquaculture development
in the United States. The meeting will
also provide an opportunity for the
public to ask questions and comment on
JSA activities. The meeting is open to
the public and participants are
encouraged to register in advance.
Participants must present valid photo
identification to enter the building.
More information is available at https://
aquaculture.noaa.gov.
The meeting is scheduled for
Thursday, July 10, 2008, from 8:30 a.m.
until 12:30 pm. e.s.t.
DATES:
NOAA Headquarters
Building #4, 1305 East-West Hwy.,
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Room 1W611, Silver Spring, Maryland,
20910.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary
Jensen, United States Department of
Agriculture, Cooperative State Research,
Education and Extension Service, 800
9th Street, Room 3409, Washington, DC
(202) 401–6802,
gjensen@csrees.usda.gov.
The Joint
Subcommittee on Aquaculture was
created by the National Aquaculture Act
of 1980 (Public Law 96–362, 94 Stat.
1198, 16 U.S.C. 2801, et seq.) and is
chaired by the Secretary of Agriculture
(designee) with vice-chairs from the
Department of Commerce and
Department of the Interior. The purpose
of the coordinating group is to increase
the overall effectiveness and
productivity of Federal aquaculture
research, transfer, and assistance
programs. In fulfilling this purpose the
coordinating group:
(1) Reviews the national needs for
aquaculture research, transfer, and
assistance;
(2) Assesses the effectiveness and
adequacy of Federal efforts to meet
those national needs;
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 107 (Tuesday, June 3, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31679-31680]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-12303]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Notice of Indirect Cost Rates for the Damage Assessment,
Remediation, and Restoration Program for Fiscal Year 2006
SUMMARY: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA's)
Damage Assessment, Remediation, and Restoration Program (DARRP) is
announcing new indirect cost rates on the recovery of indirect costs
for its component organizations involved in natural resource damage
assessment and restoration activities for fiscal year (FY) 2006. The
indirect cost rates for this fiscal year and dates of implementation
are provided in this notice. More information on these rates and the
DARRP policy can be found at the DARRP Web site at https://
www.darrp.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, contact
LaTonya Burgess at 301-713-4248, ext. 211, by fax at 301-713-4389, or
e-mail at LaTonya.Burgess@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the DARRP is to restore
natural resource injuries caused by releases of hazardous substances or
oil under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.), the Oil Pollution Act
of 1990 (OPA) (33 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.), and support restoration of
physical injuries to National Marine Sanctuary resources under the
National Marine Sanctuaries Act (NMSA) (16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.). The
DARRP consists of three component organizations: the Office of Response
and Restoration (ORR) within the National Ocean Service; the
Restoration Center within the National Marine Fisheries Service; and
the Office of the General Counsel for Natural Resources (GCNR). The
DARRP conducts Natural Resource Damage Assessments (NRDAs) as a basis
for recovering damages from responsible parties, and uses the funds
recovered to restore injured natural resources.
Consistent with Federal accounting requirements, the DARRP is
required to account for and report the full costs of its programs and
activities. Further, the DARRP is authorized by law to recover
reasonable costs of damage assessment and restoration activities under
CERCLA, OPA, and the NMSA. Within the constraints of these legal
provisions and their regulatory applications, the DARRP has the
discretion to develop indirect cost rates for its component
organizations and formulate policies on the recovery of indirect cost
rates subject to its requirements.
The DARRP's Indirect Cost Effort
In December 1998, the DARRP hired the public accounting firm Rubino
& McGeehin, Chartered (R&M) to: Evaluate cost accounting system and
allocation practices; recommend the appropriate indirect cost
allocation methodology; and determine the indirect cost rates for the
three organizations that comprise the DARRP. A Federal Register notice
on R&M's effort, their assessment of the DARRP's cost accounting system
and practice, and their determination regarding the most appropriate
indirect cost methodology and rates for FYs 1993 through 1999 was
published on December 7, 2000 (65 FR 76611). The notice and report by
R&M can also be found on the DARRP Web site at https://
www.darrp.noaa.gov.
R&M continued its assessment of DARRP's indirect cost rate system
and structure for FYs 2000 and 2001. A second federal notice specifying
the DARRP indirect rates for FYs 2000 and 2001 was published on
December 2, 2002 (67 FR 71537).
In October 2002, DARRP hired the accounting firm of Cotton and
Company LLP (Cotton) to review and certify DARRP costs incurred on
cases for purposes of cost recovery and to develop indirect rates for
FY 2002 and subsequent years. As in the prior years, Cotton concluded
that the cost accounting system and allocation practices of the DARRP
component organizations are consistent with Federal accounting
requirements. Consistent with R&M's previous analyses, Cotton also
determined that the most appropriate indirect allocation method
continues to be the Direct Labor Cost Base for all three DARRP
component organizations. The Direct Labor Cost Base is computed by
allocating total indirect cost over the sum of direct labor dollars
plus the application of NOAA's leave surcharge and benefits rates to
direct labor. Direct labor costs for contractors from I.M. Systems
Group (IMSG) were included in the direct labor base because Cotton
determined that these costs have the same relationship to the indirect
cost pool as NOAA direct labor costs. IMSG provided on-site support to
the DARRP in the areas of injury assessment, natural resource
economics, restoration planning and implementation, and policy
analysis. IMSG continues to provide on-site support to the DARRP. A
third federal notice specifying the DARRP indirect rates for FY 2002
was published on October 6, 2003 (68 FR 57672), a fourth notice for the
FY 2003 indirect cost rates appeared on May 20, 2005 (70 FR 29280), and
a fifth notice for the FY 2004 indirect cost rates was published on
March 16, 2006 (71 FR 13356). The last notice for the FY 2005 indirect
cost rates was published on February 9, 2007 (72 FR 6221). Cotton's
reports on these indirect rates can also be found on the DARRP Web site
at https://www.darrp.noaa.gov.
[[Page 31680]]
Cotton reaffirmed that the Direct Labor Cost Base is the most
appropriate indirect allocation method for the development of the FY
2006 indirect cost rates.
The DARRP's Indirect Cost Rates and Policies
The DARRP will apply the indirect cost rates for FY 2006 as
recommended by Cotton for each of the DARRP component organizations as
provided in the following table:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2006
DARP Component Organization Indirect
Rate (%)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office of Response and Restoration (ORR)................... 130.99
Restoration Center (RC).................................... 128.04
General Counsel for Natural Resources (GCNR)............... 122.01
------------------------------------------------------------------------
These rates are based on the Direct Labor Cost Base allocation
methodology.
The FY 2006 rates will be applied to all damage assessment and
restoration case costs incurred between October 1, 2005 and September
30, 2006. DARRP will use the FY 2006 indirect cost rates for future
fiscal years until subsequent year-specific rates can be developed.
For cases that have settled and for cost claims paid prior to the
effective date of the fiscal year in question, the DARRP will not re-
open any resolved matters for the purpose of applying the revised rates
in this policy for these fiscal years. For cases not settled and cost
claims not paid prior to the effective date of the fiscal year in
question, costs will be recalculated using the revised rates in this
policy for these fiscal years. Where a responsible party has agreed to
pay costs using previous year's indirect rates, but has not yet made
the payment because the settlement documents are not finalized, the
costs will not be recalculated.
The DARRP indirect cost rate policies and procedures published in
the Federal Register on December 7, 2000 (65 FR 76611), on December 2,
2002 (67 FR. 71537), October 6, 2003 (68 FR 57672), May 20, 2005 (70
Fed. Reg. 29280), March 16, 2006 (71 FR 13356), and February 9, 2007
(72 FR 6221) remain in effect except as updated by this notice. To
summarize, the DARRP indirect rates for the last five fiscal years
(beginning October 1 and ending September 30) are:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 FY 06
DARRP Component Organization (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Damage Assessment Center................................. 254.17 261.96 213.03 ......... .........
Office of Response and Restoration....................... ......... ......... ......... 180.42 130.99
Restoration Center....................................... 218.36 223.74 181.46 166.70 128.04
General Counsel for Natural Resources.................... 251.75 206.47 165.39 169.59 122.01
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: May 22, 2008.
David Westerholm,
Director, Office of Response and Restoration, National Ocean Service,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-12303 Filed 6-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JE-P