Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for Improvements to the Danbury Rail Branch in Connecticut, 31185-31187 [E8-12098]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 105 / Friday, May 30, 2008 / Notices
metropolitan planning organization
plans and programs; (d) whether the
project is consistent with plans and
programs developed by empowerment
zone and community organizations; (e)
whether the project is consistent with
plans developed for compliance with
the Clean Air Act; (f) whether or not the
project is supported by the U.S.
Customs and Border Protection Agency
or by the General Services
Administration; and (g) whether or not
the project has or will require a
Presidential Permit.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
10. Proposed Project Time-line
The Applicant should include a
proposed project time-line with
estimated start and completion dates for
major elements of the proposed project
such as:
(a) Development phase activities
(planning, feasibility analysis, revenue
forecasting, environmental review,
preliminary engineering and design
work, and other preconstruction
activities);
(b) Inclusion of the project in the
relevant State and metropolitan
transportation improvement plans;
(c) Approval needed for any required
Presidential Permits;
(d) Acquisition of real property
(including land related to the project
and improvements to land); and
(e) Construction, reconstruction, and/
or rehabilitation activities.
The Applicant also should describe
the results of any preliminary
engineering or preconstruction activities
done to date and relate it to the project
time-line.
Transportation Border Congestion
Relief Program Development
Agreement
After a project is accepted for
administration under the TBCR
Program, the next major action by the
Applicant would be to work with DOT,
the relevant border State,
municipalities, Indian tribal
government(s), Federal agencies, and
foreign jurisdictions to draft a TBCR
Program Development Agreement for
the project (Development Agreement).
The Development Agreement would
address the commitments of all parties
to the project (Federal, State, municipal
and private) with respect to the
financing, planning and design,
environmental process, construction,
operations, maintenance, and other
components. The Development
Agreement would also identify the
specific objectives of the project and
performance measures that would be
used to evaluate the success of the
project in achieving these objectives.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 May 29, 2008
Jkt 214001
DOT Resources and Commitments To
Expedite the Delivery of the Border
Crossing Project
If a project is selected for
participation in the TBCR Program, the
DOT will work with the project sponsor
to expedite the delivery of the project.
Potential DOT resources and
commitments include:
A. Federal Transportation Border
Congestion Relief Project Team
The DOT will work with the relevant
Federal agencies with an interest in the
land border crossing to establish a
senior-level Federal border congestion
team to advance the planning and
implementation of the project, including
expediting, to the maximum extent
practicable, their reviews for relevant
permits or other approvals, and take
related actions as necessary, consistent
with available resources and applicable
laws.
B. Accelerated Review and Conditional
Approval of Experimental Features
Under the FHWA SEP–15 Process
Special Experimental Project 15 (SEP–
15) is designed to permit tests and
experimentation in the project
development process for title 23, United
States Code projects. Potential areas of
experimentation for TBCR Program
projects include innovative finance,
tolling and contracting requirements.
More information about the SEP–15
program is available on the following
Web site: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ppp/
index.htm. The DOT is considering
further experimental programs that may
apply to the approved projects.
C. Expedited Commitment Process for
TIFIA Credit Assistance
The TIFIA program provides three
forms of credit assistance—secured
loans, loan guarantees, and standby
lines of credit—for surface
transportation projects of national or
regional significance. Each border State
seeking to incorporate TIFIA credit
assistance as part of a project finance
plan can receive a preliminary TIFIA
commitment under SEP–15.
The DOT would work with each
project sponsor to establish a
preliminary plan of finance
incorporating TIFIA assistance. This
preliminary commitment would
expedite the loan review process to be
undertaken should the border State’s
selected concessionaire seek TIFIA
assistance. Information about the TIFIA
credit program is available on the
following Web site: https://
tifia.fhwa.dot.gov/.
PO 00000
Frm 00134
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31185
D. Priority Access to DOT Experts
Projects accepted for the TBCR
Program will have access to DOT
experts knowledgeable in the areas of
planning, the environment, publicprivate partnerships, finance,
construction, safety, operations, and
asset management.
E. Other Discretionary Funding
The DOT will work with Applicant(s)
to identify other possible discretionary
funding sources.
F. Tolling and Private Activity Bonds
(PAB)
Applicant(s) may consider applying to
DOT for authority to toll any Federal-aid
highway as part of a TBCR project. The
use of tolls would not only help finance
the road, but the use of tolls also, if the
amounts are varied, could help manage
the volume of traffic utilizing the
crossing at any given point during the
day. Applicants may also consider
applying for an allocation of PAB
authority under Section 11143 of
SAFETEA–LU as part of a TBCR project.
The DOT will work with any selected
Applicant(s) to explore what options
might be available in these areas.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 101.
Issued on: May 23, 2008.
Thomas J. Barrett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–12055 Filed 5–29–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Intent To Prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement for Improvements to
the Danbury Rail Branch in
Connecticut
Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) and the
Connecticut Department of
Transportation (ConnDOT), in
cooperation with the Southwest
Regional Planning Agency and
Housatonic Valley Council of Elected
Officials, intend to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
on proposed commuter rail transit
service and infrastructure improvements
along the New Haven Line, Danbury
Branch Rail Line in Connecticut. The
New York Metropolitan Transportation
Authority’s Metro North Railroad
E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM
30MYN1
31186
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 105 / Friday, May 30, 2008 / Notices
operates the New Haven Rail Line
service for ConnDOT and is a
cooperating agency in the EIS process.
The EIS will be prepared in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) and its implementing
regulations by the Council on the
Environmental Quality (40 CFR parts
1500–1508) and FTA/FHWA (23 CFR
771), as well as provisions of section
6002 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible,
Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A
Legacy for Users (SAFETEA–LU). The
Draft EIS will be combined with the
planning Alternatives Analysis required
by Federal Transit law [49 U.S.C.
5309(a)] for projects proposed for New
Starts or Small Starts funding.
The purpose of this notice is to alert
interested parties regarding the intent to
prepare the EIS, to provide and solicit
information on the nature of the
proposed project and possible
alternatives, to invite public
participation in the NEPA process
(including providing comments on the
scope of the EIS), and to announce that
three public scoping meetings will be
conducted.
A series of three public scoping
meetings will be held in the project’s
study area. The public scoping meetings
will be held the week of June 16, 2008
from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. in the Towns of
Wilton, Ridgefield, and New Milford,
Connecticut. The following is the
meeting schedule: Tuesday, June 17th
2008, E. Paul Martin Room, Town Hall,
Top Floor, 10 Main Street, New Milford,
CT 06776; Wednesday, June 18th, 2008,
Town Hall Annex Building, Meeting
Room A, 238 Danbury Road, Wilton, CT
06897; Thursday, June 19th 2008, Town
Hall large conference room, Ridgefield
Town Hall, 400 Main Street, Ridgefield,
CT 06877. The project’s initial statement
of purpose and need, and the initial set
of alternatives proposed for the study
will be presented at these meetings.
Comments may be given verbally or in
writing at the scoping meeting. Every
reasonable effort will be made to meet
special needs. The meetings locations
will be accessible to persons with
disabilities. Individuals who require
special accommodations, such as sign
language interpreter, to participate in
the meeting should contact Mr. Judd
Everhart, Public Relations Office,
Connecticut Department of
Transportation, 2800 Berlin Turnpike,
Newington, CT 06131–7546 or by
telephone at (860) 594–3003.
Agency Scoping Meeting: An agency
scoping meeting will be held on
Tuesday, June 17, 2008, 1–3 p.m., City
Hall, 155 Deer Hill Avenue, Danbury,
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 May 29, 2008
Jkt 214001
CT 06810. Meeting invitations along
with the scoping information packet
will be sent to all Federal, State, local
and tribal governmental agencies that
may have an interest in the proposed
project.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be sent to the following address by July
25, 2008: Mr. Andrew H. Davis,
Connecticut Department of
Transportation, 2800 Berlin Turnpike,
Newington, CT 06131–7546 or https://
www.andrew.h.davis@po.state.ct.us.
The locations of the scoping meetings
are given above under DATES.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Donald Burns, AICP, Senior Planner,
Region II, Federal Transit
Administration, One Bowling Green,
Room 429, New York, NY 10004.
Telephone: (212) 668–2170.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Feasibility Study: Danbury
Branch Electrification—Phase I
(Feasibility Study), completed in 2006,
developed the alternatives being
considered in the Alternatives Analysis/
Draft EIS (AA/DEIS) for the New Haven
Line’s commuter rail branch line service
between Norwalk and Danbury. The
Feasibility Study identified, reviewed,
and evaluated a range of preliminary
improvements to the Branch, including
electrification, addition of passing
sidings, extension of rail passenger
commuter service to New Milford, and
track realignments. Public information
meetings were held on November 29,
2005 at the Wilton Town Hall Annex
and on December 1, 2005 at the former
New Milford Railroad Station, to
present and discuss the results of the
Feasibility Study and the alternatives
recommended for further consideration
in the AA/DEIS. A scoping coordination
meeting was held on July 11, 2006 to
discuss the scope of work with the
Federal and State resource agencies,
including the environmental resources
to be investigated, the level of detail
required for each resource, and further
refinement of the alternatives.
The AA/DEIS will continue the
evaluation initiated in the Feasibility
Study with more detailed analysis. The
Feasibility Study documentation and
Final Report was published in May 2006
and can be viewed on the project Web
site at https://
www.danburybranchstudy.com.
I. Scoping
Scoping of the EIS will be
accomplished through public meetings;
e-mail and hard copy correspondence
with interested individuals and
organizations, Federal, State, and local
agencies, and Native American Tribes;
PO 00000
Frm 00135
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and through a meeting with potential
cooperating and participating public
agencies. Interested parties may
comment by: (1) Mailing or e-mailing
written comments to the address under
ADDRESSES above; or (2) attending one of
the public scoping meetings described
under DATES above. The FTA and
ConnDOT invite all interested
individuals and organizations, public
agencies, and Native American Tribes to
comment on the scope of the EIS
including the project’s purpose and
need, the alternatives to be considered,
the impacts to be evaluated, and the
evaluation methodologies to be used.
Comments at this stage should focus on
refining the purpose and need
statement, identifying alternatives to
meet the purpose and need at lower cost
or with less impact, and on identifying
specific social, economic, or
environmental impacts to be evaluated.
The scoping period will end July 25,
2008. A scoping information packet will
be posted on the project Web site at
https://www.danburybranchstudy.com
and hard copies of the packet will be
distributed upon request.
During the scoping process, ConnDOT
and FTA will comply with section 6002
of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible,
Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A
Legacy for Users (SAFETEA–LU)
requires that the lead agencies: (1)
Extend an invitation to other Federal
and non-Federal agencies and Native
American tribes that may have an
interest in the proposed project to
become participating agencies; (2)
provide an opportunity for involvement
by participating agencies and the public
in defining the purpose and need for the
proposed project and the range of
alternatives to be considered in the EIS;
and (3) establish a plan for coordinating
public and agency participation in, and
comment on, the environmental review
process.
II. Purpose and Need
The preliminary statement of the
purpose of, and need for, the proposed
project follows:
The purpose of the Danbury Branch
Improvement Program and
Electrification is to improve mobility
options for the traveling public in the
South Western and Housatonic Valley
regions of Connecticut; to maintain and
improve existing commuter rail service
on the Branch, as well as to improve its
feeder system and intermodal
connections on the Branch; and to help
reduce congestion in the Route 7
corridor between South Norwalk, CT
and New Milford, CT.
E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM
30MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 105 / Friday, May 30, 2008 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
To accomplish these purposes, the
following specific objectives are
defined:
• Improve interstate and intrastate
transit mobility, along the north-south
South Norwalk—New Milford Corridor.
• Examine enhancements to existing
transit services in the corridor by
electrifying the branch or portions of it.
• Enhance economic development
and Transit Oriented Development
(TOD) opportunities in conjunction
with participating cities and towns land
use plans.
• Improve mobility in the South
Norwalk—New Milford Corridor by
attracting trips to transit service.
Interested parties are invited to
consider and comment on this
preliminary statement of the purpose
and need for the proposed project.
III. Alternatives
The general location of the study
corridor is the existing Danbury Branch
Rail Line which traverses 23.6 miles
from South Norwalk, through Wilton,
Cannondale, Branchville, Redding, and
Bethel to Danbury, and the potential
extension of the line 14.3 miles into
New Milford. The project termini would
be the existing branch line’s southern
terminus at its connection with the New
Haven Line in South Norwalk, and the
proposed new northern terminus in
New Milford. The EIS will examine and
evaluate a number of rail service and
infrastructure improvement alternatives
in the corridor. Additional alternatives
generated by the scoping process as well
as alternative station locations for the
Build alternatives will also be
considered.
The alternatives proposed for
consideration in the EIS as a result of
the Feasibility Study (2006) include: (A)
The No-build alternative; (B) a
Transportation System Management
alternative, which include service
improvements such as new outbound
service, and express service; (C) South
Norwalk to Danbury Improvements
including electrification, addition of
passing sidings, and minor track
realignment; (D) extension of diesel
passenger service from Danbury to New
Milford with improvements including
new stations and minor track
realignment; and (E) partial
electrification from South Norwalk to
the vicinity of the Merritt 7 Station with
feeder bus/rail service to complement
the new service. The EIS will
incorporate data and findings from the
Final Report of the Feasibility Study
Danbury Branch Electrification (May
2006). Copies of this report are available
from Mr. Andrew H. Davis of ConnDOT
at the address shown above under
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 May 29, 2008
Jkt 214001
and on the project Web site
at https://
www.danburybranchstudy.com.
Interested parties are invited to consider
and comment on the alternatives
proposed for consideration in the AA/
DEIS.
ADDRESSES
IV. Probable Effects
FTA and ConnDOT will evaluate all
significant environmental and
community impacts of the alternatives
that emerge from the scoping process.
FTA expects the major issue to be rail
noise and vibration impacts at nearby
residences, property acquisition and
relocation of the businesses and
residences located on the acquired
properties. These and any other impacts
will be evaluated for both the
construction period and for the longterm period of operation. Measures to
mitigate adverse impacts will be
developed for the AA/DEIS and
finalized in the Final EIS. Interested
parties are invited to consider and
comment on the impacts to be evaluated
in the AA/DEIS and on options and
measures to avoid, minimize and
mitigate adverse impacts.
V. FTA Procedures
In accordance with 23 CFR 771.105(a)
and 771.133, FTA and ConnDOT will
comply with all Federal environmental
laws, regulations, and executive orders
applicable to the proposed project
during the environmental review
process. These requirements include,
but are not limited to, the
environmental and public hearing
provisions of Federal transit laws (49
U.S.C. 5301(e), 5323(b), and 5324); the
project-level air quality conformity
regulation of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) (40 CFR Part
93); Section 404(b)(1) guidelines of EPA
(40 CFR Part 230); the regulation
implementing Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act (36
CFR Part 800); the regulation
implementing section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act (50 CFR Part
402); Section 4(f) of the Department of
Transportation Act (23 CFR part 774);
and Executive Orders 12898 on
Environmental Justice, 11988 on
Floodplain Management, and 11990 on
Wetlands.
ConnDOT anticipates seeking federal
assistance from the FTA to fund the
proposed project under 49 United States
Code 5309 and will, therefore, be
subject to regulations (49 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 611).
Accordingly, following the public
comment period for the AA/DEIS,
ConnDOT will select a locally preferred
alternative based on ridership forecasts,
PO 00000
Frm 00136
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31187
service performance evaluation,
estimated capital and operating costs,
environmental impacts, social and
economic impacts, and community
support. ConnDOT will seek FTA
approval to initiate Small Starts Project
Development, and if FTA so approves,
the Final EIS will be prepared in
conjunction with the New Starts/Small
Starts process.
Date Issued: May 21, 2008.
Brigid Hynes-Cherin,
Regional Administrator, Federal Transit
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–12098 Filed 5–29–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–57–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2008–0108]
Quiet Cars Notice of Public Meeting
and Request for Comments
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of public meeting,
request for information.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NHTSA is having a public
meeting to bring together government
policymakers, stakeholders from the
blind community, industry
representatives and public interest
groups to discuss the safety of blind
pedestrians encountering quiet cars
including hybrids, all-electric vehicles
and quiet internal combustion engine
vehicles. This public meeting and the
request for information, is an
opportunity for an exchange among
interested parties, as well as the public,
on the technical and safety policy issues
related to increasingly quieter cars and
blind pedestrians. The date, time,
location, and framework for this public
meeting are announced in this notice.
DATES: Public Meeting: The public
meeting will be held on June 23, 2008,
from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. at the Grand Hyatt
Washington, Washington, DC.
Comments: Written comments may be
submitted to the agency and must be
received no later than August 1, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs.
Debbie Ascone, Office of the Senior
Associate Administrator for Vehicle
Safety, NHTSA, telephone 202–366–
4383, e-mail Debbie.Ascone@dot.gov.
She may also be reached at 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590.
ADDRESSES: Public meeting: The public
meeting will be held at the Grand Hyatt
E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM
30MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 105 (Friday, May 30, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31185-31187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-12098]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for
Improvements to the Danbury Rail Branch in Connecticut
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and the Connecticut
Department of Transportation (ConnDOT), in cooperation with the
Southwest Regional Planning Agency and Housatonic Valley Council of
Elected Officials, intend to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) on proposed commuter rail transit service and infrastructure
improvements along the New Haven Line, Danbury Branch Rail Line in
Connecticut. The New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority's Metro
North Railroad
[[Page 31186]]
operates the New Haven Rail Line service for ConnDOT and is a
cooperating agency in the EIS process.
The EIS will be prepared in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) and its implementing
regulations by the Council on the Environmental Quality (40 CFR parts
1500-1508) and FTA/FHWA (23 CFR 771), as well as provisions of section
6002 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation
Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). The Draft EIS will be
combined with the planning Alternatives Analysis required by Federal
Transit law [49 U.S.C. 5309(a)] for projects proposed for New Starts or
Small Starts funding.
The purpose of this notice is to alert interested parties regarding
the intent to prepare the EIS, to provide and solicit information on
the nature of the proposed project and possible alternatives, to invite
public participation in the NEPA process (including providing comments
on the scope of the EIS), and to announce that three public scoping
meetings will be conducted.
DATES: A series of three public scoping meetings will be held in the
project's study area. The public scoping meetings will be held the week
of June 16, 2008 from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. in the Towns of Wilton,
Ridgefield, and New Milford, Connecticut. The following is the meeting
schedule: Tuesday, June 17th 2008, E. Paul Martin Room, Town Hall, Top
Floor, 10 Main Street, New Milford, CT 06776; Wednesday, June 18th,
2008, Town Hall Annex Building, Meeting Room A, 238 Danbury Road,
Wilton, CT 06897; Thursday, June 19th 2008, Town Hall large conference
room, Ridgefield Town Hall, 400 Main Street, Ridgefield, CT 06877. The
project's initial statement of purpose and need, and the initial set of
alternatives proposed for the study will be presented at these
meetings. Comments may be given verbally or in writing at the scoping
meeting. Every reasonable effort will be made to meet special needs.
The meetings locations will be accessible to persons with disabilities.
Individuals who require special accommodations, such as sign language
interpreter, to participate in the meeting should contact Mr. Judd
Everhart, Public Relations Office, Connecticut Department of
Transportation, 2800 Berlin Turnpike, Newington, CT 06131-7546 or by
telephone at (860) 594-3003.
Agency Scoping Meeting: An agency scoping meeting will be held on
Tuesday, June 17, 2008, 1-3 p.m., City Hall, 155 Deer Hill Avenue,
Danbury, CT 06810. Meeting invitations along with the scoping
information packet will be sent to all Federal, State, local and tribal
governmental agencies that may have an interest in the proposed
project.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to the following address by
July 25, 2008: Mr. Andrew H. Davis, Connecticut Department of
Transportation, 2800 Berlin Turnpike, Newington, CT 06131-7546 or
http:www.andrew.h.davis@po.state.ct.us">//www.andrew.h.davis@po.state.ct.us. The locations of the scoping
meetings are given above under DATES.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Donald Burns, AICP, Senior
Planner, Region II, Federal Transit Administration, One Bowling Green,
Room 429, New York, NY 10004. Telephone: (212) 668-2170.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Feasibility Study: Danbury Branch Electrification--Phase I
(Feasibility Study), completed in 2006, developed the alternatives
being considered in the Alternatives Analysis/Draft EIS (AA/DEIS) for
the New Haven Line's commuter rail branch line service between Norwalk
and Danbury. The Feasibility Study identified, reviewed, and evaluated
a range of preliminary improvements to the Branch, including
electrification, addition of passing sidings, extension of rail
passenger commuter service to New Milford, and track realignments.
Public information meetings were held on November 29, 2005 at the
Wilton Town Hall Annex and on December 1, 2005 at the former New
Milford Railroad Station, to present and discuss the results of the
Feasibility Study and the alternatives recommended for further
consideration in the AA/DEIS. A scoping coordination meeting was held
on July 11, 2006 to discuss the scope of work with the Federal and
State resource agencies, including the environmental resources to be
investigated, the level of detail required for each resource, and
further refinement of the alternatives.
The AA/DEIS will continue the evaluation initiated in the
Feasibility Study with more detailed analysis. The Feasibility Study
documentation and Final Report was published in May 2006 and can be
viewed on the project Web site at https://www.danburybranchstudy.com.
I. Scoping
Scoping of the EIS will be accomplished through public meetings; e-
mail and hard copy correspondence with interested individuals and
organizations, Federal, State, and local agencies, and Native American
Tribes; and through a meeting with potential cooperating and
participating public agencies. Interested parties may comment by: (1)
Mailing or e-mailing written comments to the address under ADDRESSES
above; or (2) attending one of the public scoping meetings described
under DATES above. The FTA and ConnDOT invite all interested
individuals and organizations, public agencies, and Native American
Tribes to comment on the scope of the EIS including the project's
purpose and need, the alternatives to be considered, the impacts to be
evaluated, and the evaluation methodologies to be used. Comments at
this stage should focus on refining the purpose and need statement,
identifying alternatives to meet the purpose and need at lower cost or
with less impact, and on identifying specific social, economic, or
environmental impacts to be evaluated. The scoping period will end July
25, 2008. A scoping information packet will be posted on the project
Web site at https://www.danburybranchstudy.com and hard copies of the
packet will be distributed upon request.
During the scoping process, ConnDOT and FTA will comply with
section 6002 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) requires
that the lead agencies: (1) Extend an invitation to other Federal and
non-Federal agencies and Native American tribes that may have an
interest in the proposed project to become participating agencies; (2)
provide an opportunity for involvement by participating agencies and
the public in defining the purpose and need for the proposed project
and the range of alternatives to be considered in the EIS; and (3)
establish a plan for coordinating public and agency participation in,
and comment on, the environmental review process.
II. Purpose and Need
The preliminary statement of the purpose of, and need for, the
proposed project follows:
The purpose of the Danbury Branch Improvement Program and
Electrification is to improve mobility options for the traveling public
in the South Western and Housatonic Valley regions of Connecticut; to
maintain and improve existing commuter rail service on the Branch, as
well as to improve its feeder system and intermodal connections on the
Branch; and to help reduce congestion in the Route 7 corridor between
South Norwalk, CT and New Milford, CT.
[[Page 31187]]
To accomplish these purposes, the following specific objectives are
defined:
Improve interstate and intrastate transit mobility, along
the north-south South Norwalk--New Milford Corridor.
Examine enhancements to existing transit services in the
corridor by electrifying the branch or portions of it.
Enhance economic development and Transit Oriented
Development (TOD) opportunities in conjunction with participating
cities and towns land use plans.
Improve mobility in the South Norwalk--New Milford
Corridor by attracting trips to transit service.
Interested parties are invited to consider and comment on this
preliminary statement of the purpose and need for the proposed project.
III. Alternatives
The general location of the study corridor is the existing Danbury
Branch Rail Line which traverses 23.6 miles from South Norwalk, through
Wilton, Cannondale, Branchville, Redding, and Bethel to Danbury, and
the potential extension of the line 14.3 miles into New Milford. The
project termini would be the existing branch line's southern terminus
at its connection with the New Haven Line in South Norwalk, and the
proposed new northern terminus in New Milford. The EIS will examine and
evaluate a number of rail service and infrastructure improvement
alternatives in the corridor. Additional alternatives generated by the
scoping process as well as alternative station locations for the Build
alternatives will also be considered.
The alternatives proposed for consideration in the EIS as a result
of the Feasibility Study (2006) include: (A) The No-build alternative;
(B) a Transportation System Management alternative, which include
service improvements such as new outbound service, and express service;
(C) South Norwalk to Danbury Improvements including electrification,
addition of passing sidings, and minor track realignment; (D) extension
of diesel passenger service from Danbury to New Milford with
improvements including new stations and minor track realignment; and
(E) partial electrification from South Norwalk to the vicinity of the
Merritt 7 Station with feeder bus/rail service to complement the new
service. The EIS will incorporate data and findings from the Final
Report of the Feasibility Study Danbury Branch Electrification (May
2006). Copies of this report are available from Mr. Andrew H. Davis of
ConnDOT at the address shown above under ADDRESSES and on the project
Web site at https://www.danburybranchstudy.com. Interested parties are
invited to consider and comment on the alternatives proposed for
consideration in the AA/DEIS.
IV. Probable Effects
FTA and ConnDOT will evaluate all significant environmental and
community impacts of the alternatives that emerge from the scoping
process. FTA expects the major issue to be rail noise and vibration
impacts at nearby residences, property acquisition and relocation of
the businesses and residences located on the acquired properties. These
and any other impacts will be evaluated for both the construction
period and for the long-term period of operation. Measures to mitigate
adverse impacts will be developed for the AA/DEIS and finalized in the
Final EIS. Interested parties are invited to consider and comment on
the impacts to be evaluated in the AA/DEIS and on options and measures
to avoid, minimize and mitigate adverse impacts.
V. FTA Procedures
In accordance with 23 CFR 771.105(a) and 771.133, FTA and ConnDOT
will comply with all Federal environmental laws, regulations, and
executive orders applicable to the proposed project during the
environmental review process. These requirements include, but are not
limited to, the environmental and public hearing provisions of Federal
transit laws (49 U.S.C. 5301(e), 5323(b), and 5324); the project-level
air quality conformity regulation of the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) (40 CFR Part 93); Section 404(b)(1) guidelines of EPA (40
CFR Part 230); the regulation implementing Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act (36 CFR Part 800); the regulation
implementing section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (50 CFR Part 402);
Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act (23 CFR part 774);
and Executive Orders 12898 on Environmental Justice, 11988 on
Floodplain Management, and 11990 on Wetlands.
ConnDOT anticipates seeking federal assistance from the FTA to fund
the proposed project under 49 United States Code 5309 and will,
therefore, be subject to regulations (49 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) Part 611). Accordingly, following the public comment period for
the AA/DEIS, ConnDOT will select a locally preferred alternative based
on ridership forecasts, service performance evaluation, estimated
capital and operating costs, environmental impacts, social and economic
impacts, and community support. ConnDOT will seek FTA approval to
initiate Small Starts Project Development, and if FTA so approves, the
Final EIS will be prepared in conjunction with the New Starts/Small
Starts process.
Date Issued: May 21, 2008.
Brigid Hynes-Cherin,
Regional Administrator, Federal Transit Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-12098 Filed 5-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-57-P