Notice of Inventory Completion: Robert S. Peabody Museum of Archaeology, Phillips Academy, Andover, MA, 30969-30970 [E8-11993]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 104 / Thursday, May 29, 2008 / Notices
Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma; Ponca
Tribe of Nebraska; Three Affiliated
Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation,
North Dakota; and Wichita and
Affiliated Tribes, Oklahoma.
Representatives of any other Indian
tribe that believes itself to be culturally
affiliated with the human remains
should contact Teresa Kreutzer–Hodson,
Hastings Museum of Natural and
Cultural History, 1330 N Burlington, PO
Box 1286, Hastings, NE 68902,
telephone (402) 461–2399, before June
30, 2008. Repatriation of the human
remains to the Pawnee Nation of
Oklahoma may proceed after that date if
no additional claimants come forward.
The Hastings Museum of Natural and
Cultural History is responsible for
notifying the Crow Tribe of Montana;
Omaha Tribe of Nebraska; Otoe–
Missouria Tribe of Indians, Oklahoma;
Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma; Ponca
Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma; Ponca
Tribe of Nebraska; Three Affiliated
Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation,
North Dakota; and Wichita and
Affiliated Tribes, Oklahoma that this
notice has been published.
Dated: March 27, 2008
Sherry Hutt,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. E8–12000 Filed 5–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–50–S
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Notice of Inventory Completion for
Human Remains in the Possession of
the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum,
Honolulu, HI; Correction
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice; correction.
AGENCY:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
ACTION:
Notice is here given in accordance
with the Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act
(NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3003, of the
completion of an inventory of human
remains in the possession and control of
the Bishop Museum, Honolulu, HI. The
human remains were removed from
Lanai Island, HI.
This notice is published as part of the
National Park Service’s administrative
responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25
U.S.C. 3003 (d)(3). The determinations
in this notice are the sole responsibility
of the museum, institution, or Federal
agency that has control of the Native
American human remains and
associated funerary objects. The
National Park Service is not responsible
for the determinations in this notice.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:45 May 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
This notice corrects the Native
Hawaiian Organizations to whom the
human remains will be repatriated.
In the Federal Register of October 10,
2002 (FR Doc 02–25871, pages 63151–
63152), paragraph numbers 6 and 7 are
corrected by substituting the following
paragraphs:
Officials of the Bishop Museum have
determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C.
3001 (9–10), the human remains
described above represent the physical
remains of two individuals of Native
Hawaiian ancestry. Officials of the
Bishop Museum also have determined
that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (2),
there is a relationship of shared group
identity that can be reasonably traced
between the Native Hawaiian human
remains and Hui Kako‘o and Hui
Malama I Na Kupuna O Hawaii Nei.
Lastly, officials of the Bishop Museum
have determined that Hui Kako‘o is the
most appropriate claimant for
repatriation of the human remains.
Representatives of any other Native
Hawaiian Organization that believes
itself to be culturally affiliated with the
human remains should contact Betty
Lou Kam, Vice President, Cultural
Studies, Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice
Street, Honolulu, HI 96817, telephone
(808) 848–4144, before June 30, 2008.
Repatriation to Hui Kako‘o will proceed
after that date if no additional claimants
come forward.
The Bishop Museum is responsible
for notifying Hui Kako‘o, Lana‘i Island
Burial Council, Hui Malama I Na
Kupuna O Hawaii Nei, and Office of
Hawaiian Affairs.
Dated: April 23, 2008
Sherry Hutt,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. E8–12003 Filed 5–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–50–S
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Notice of Inventory Completion: Robert
S. Peabody Museum of Archaeology,
Phillips Academy, Andover, MA
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice is here given in accordance
with the Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act
(NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3003, of the
completion of an inventory of human
remains in the possession of the Robert
S. Peabody Museum of Archaeology at
Phillips Academy, Andover, MA. The
human remains were removed from
Barnstable County, MA.
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30969
This notice is published as part of the
National Park Service’s administrative
responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25
U.S.C. 3003 (d)(3). The determinations
in this notice are the sole responsibility
of the museum, institution, or Federal
agency that has control of the Native
American human remains. The National
Park Service is not responsible for the
determinations in this notice.
A detailed assessment of the human
remains was made by Robert S. Peabody
Museum of Archaeology professional
staff in consultation with
representatives of the Wampanoag
Repatriation Confederation, on behalf of
the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe;
Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head
(Aquinnah) of Massachusetts; and
Assonet Band of the Wampanoag
Nation, a non–federally recognized
Indian group.
In 1951, a human remain representing
a minimum of one individual was
removed from the Rich Site (19–BN–
163) in Barnstable County, MA, by
Harold Curtis. The human remains were
transferred at an unknown date to Ross
Moffett and later donated to the Robert
S. Peabody Museum of Archaeology in
1969. No known individual was
identified. No associated funerary
objects are present.
The isolated tooth documented in this
inventory appears to come from the
‘‘black earth and shell’’ strata, an upper
level of the site that is presumably a
Middle Woodland/Late Woodland
occupation. The Rich site (19–BN–163)
is one of several sites on the Outer Cape
that reflects a pattern of year–round
occupation and increasing sedentism in
the late Middle Woodland to the Late
Woodland (Massachusetts Historical
Commission 1987 Historic and
Archaeological Resources of Cape Cod
and the Islands). In addition to the area
around Truro, where the Rich site is
located, other comparable cores on the
Outer Cape include Wellfleet Harbor
and the Nauset area in Eastham. In each
site, there is a concentration of
settlement not previously seen in the
archeological record and strong
evidence for year–round occupation.
This includes floral and faunal data, as
well as an array of site locations (and
orientations) in each core area that fits
the known range of seasonally exploited
resources (Francis P. McManamon, ed.
Chapters in the Archaeology of Cape
Cod, Volumes I and II, 1984).
Concomitant with this evidence for
year–round occupation are mortuary
data that indicate a significantly
different pattern than evident on earlier
sites. This includes the use of defined
cemeteries, as well as ossuaries, which
elsewhere in the Northeast are strongly
E:\FR\FM\29MYN1.SGM
29MYN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
30970
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 104 / Thursday, May 29, 2008 / Notices
linked with sedentary, tribal people
(McManamon, Bradley and Magennis,
The Indian Neck Ossuary, 1986). This
pattern appears to occur elsewhere
along the southern end of the Gulf of
Maine and along the southern New
England coast to Narragansett Bay and
possibly beyond, and first becomes
visible during the late Middle
Woodland and continues to characterize
Wampanoag subsistence patterns
throughout the Late Woodland/Contact
Periods.
Distinct patterns of material culture
and distribution for late Middle
Woodland/Late Woodland sites such as
the Rich site have been documented by
many researchers (Ross Moffett, ‘‘A
Review of Cape Cod Archaeology,’’
Bulletin of the Massachusetts Historical
Society, XIX(1) 1957; William Ritchie
The Archaeology of Martha’s Vineyard,
1969; McManamon 1984). ‘‘[T]he first
intensive peopling of the Cape region’’
occurred during the Middle Woodland
period and these sites were marked by
‘‘nearly all of the earlier shell heap and
black midden accumulations’’
associated with grit–tempered pottery
and stemmed points (Moffett 1957: 5).
Although minor changes in ceramic
form and decoration occur, current
evidence indicates continuity rather
than change in the material culture of
late Middle Woodland through Late
Woodland period sites (Ritchie 1969;
McManamon 1984 I & II). The
Massachusetts Historical Commission
notes that the presence of Large
Triangles is typical in Late Woodland
Period assemblages (Michael J.
Connolly, Historic and Archaeological
Resources of Cape Cod and the Islands,
1987).
Various European explorers and
settlers documented the presence of
Pokanoket (Wampanoag) people in
southeastern Massachusetts, including
Cape Cod during the late 16th and early
17th century. Historical sources used to
identify Wellfleet inside
Pamet/Wampanoag territory include
William Wood, New England
Prospect,1865; William Bradford, Of
Plymouth Plantation, 1987; and Daniel
Gookin, Historical Collections of the
Indians in New England, 1970.
Contemporary scholarship continues to
document the presence of
Wampanoag/Pamet people in this area
including, Trigger, Bruce, ed.,
Handbook of North American Indians,
v.15, 1978: 177–181, and Gibson, Susan
B., ed., Burr’s Hill: A Seventeenth
Century Wampanoag Burial Ground in
Warren, Rhode Island,1980.
Wampanoag presence has also been
demonstrated in the Massachusetts
Historical Commissions two volumes on
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:45 May 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
Cape Cod and Southeastern
Massachusetts (Massachusetts Historical
Commission 1982 Historic and
Archaeological Resources of Southeast
Massachusetts, and 1987 Historic and
Archaeological Resources of Cape Cod
and the Islands).
Other critical sources that identify the
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe as the
present–day descendants of these
people include Russell Peters, The
Wampanoags of Mashpee, 1987;
William S. Simmons, Spirit of the New
England Tribes: Indian History and
Folklore, 1620–1984, 1986; and Jack
Campisi, The Mashpee Indians: Tribe on
Trial, 1991. Writing about the numerous
Wampanoag communities throughout
southeastern Massachusetts, William
Simmons explains, ‘‘(F)rom the late
seventeenth century to the early
twentieth century, many of these
enclaves either coalesced with others or
simply died out, leaving two principal
concentrations of Wampanoag at Gay
Head on Martha’s Vineyard and at
Mashpee.’’ Russell Peters’ text is an
important document from the
perspective of the Mashpee community
documenting their continued existence
as a tribe.
The Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe;
Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head
(Aquinnah) of Massachusetts; Assonet
Band of the Wampanoag Nation, a non–
federally recognized Indian group, and
Wampanoag Repatriation Confederation,
a non–federally recognized Indian
group; provided verbal evidence during
consultations for the Rich Site to have
existed within the ancestral area of the
Wampanoag.
Officials of the Robert S. Peabody
Museum of Archaeology have found,
based on the preponderance of the
evidence, including consultation
evidence and scholarship, that a shared
group identity can be reasonably traced
between the inhabitants of the Rich site
(19–BN–163) for the periods represented
in the museum’s collections and the
present–day Wampanoag Tribes of
Massachusetts.
Officials of the Robert S. Peabody
Museum of Archaeology have
determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C.
3001 (9–10), the human remain
described above represent the physical
remains of one individual of Native
American ancestry. Officials of the
Robert S. Peabody Museum of
Archaeology also have determined that,
pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (2), there is
a relationship of shared group identity
that can be reasonably traced between
the Native American human remains
and the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe and
Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head
(Aquinnah) of Massachusetts.
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Furthermore, officials of the Robert S.
Peabody Museum of Archaeology have
determined that there is a cultural
relationship between the Native
American human remains and the
Assonet Band of the Wampanoag
Nation, a non–federally recognized
Indian group.
Representatives of any other Indian
tribe that believes itself to be culturally
affiliated with the human remains
should contact Malinda S. Blustain,
Director, Robert S. Peabody Museum of
Archaeology, Phillips Academy,
Andover, MA 01810, telephone (978)
749–4490, before June 30, 2008.
Repatriation of the human remains to
the Wampanoag Repatriation
Confederation on behalf of the
Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head
(Aquinnah) of Massachusetts, Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe, and Assonet Band of
the Wampanoag Nation, a non–federally
recognized Indian group may proceed
after that date if no additional claimants
come forward.
The Robert S. Peabody Museum of
Archaeology is responsible for notifying
the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe;
Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head
(Aquinnah) of Massachusetts; Assonet
Band of the Wampanoag Nation, a non–
federally recognized Indian group; and
Wampanoag Repatriation Confederation,
a non–federally recognized Indian group
that this notice has been published.
Dated: April 18, 2008
Sherry Hutt,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. E8–11993 Filed 5–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–50–S
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Notice of Inventory Completion: Robert
S. Peabody Museum of Archaeology,
Phillips Academy, Andover, MA
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice is here given in accordance
with the Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act
(NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3003, of the
completion of an inventory of human
remains and associated funerary objects
in the possession of the Robert S.
Peabody Museum of Archaeology at
Phillips Academy, Andover, MA. The
human remains and associated funerary
objects were removed from Maricopa
County, AZ.
This notice is published as part of the
National Park Service’s administrative
responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25
E:\FR\FM\29MYN1.SGM
29MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 104 (Thursday, May 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30969-30970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-11993]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Notice of Inventory Completion: Robert S. Peabody Museum of
Archaeology, Phillips Academy, Andover, MA
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice is here given in accordance with the Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3003, of the
completion of an inventory of human remains in the possession of the
Robert S. Peabody Museum of Archaeology at Phillips Academy, Andover,
MA. The human remains were removed from Barnstable County, MA.
This notice is published as part of the National Park Service's
administrative responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 U.S.C. 3003 (d)(3).
The determinations in this notice are the sole responsibility of the
museum, institution, or Federal agency that has control of the Native
American human remains. The National Park Service is not responsible
for the determinations in this notice.
A detailed assessment of the human remains was made by Robert S.
Peabody Museum of Archaeology professional staff in consultation with
representatives of the Wampanoag Repatriation Confederation, on behalf
of the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe; Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah)
of Massachusetts; and Assonet Band of the Wampanoag Nation, a non-
federally recognized Indian group.
In 1951, a human remain representing a minimum of one individual
was removed from the Rich Site (19-BN-163) in Barnstable County, MA, by
Harold Curtis. The human remains were transferred at an unknown date to
Ross Moffett and later donated to the Robert S. Peabody Museum of
Archaeology in 1969. No known individual was identified. No associated
funerary objects are present.
The isolated tooth documented in this inventory appears to come
from the ``black earth and shell'' strata, an upper level of the site
that is presumably a Middle Woodland[sol]Late Woodland occupation. The
Rich site (19-BN-163) is one of several sites on the Outer Cape that
reflects a pattern of year-round occupation and increasing sedentism in
the late Middle Woodland to the Late Woodland (Massachusetts Historical
Commission 1987 Historic and Archaeological Resources of Cape Cod and
the Islands). In addition to the area around Truro, where the Rich site
is located, other comparable cores on the Outer Cape include Wellfleet
Harbor and the Nauset area in Eastham. In each site, there is a
concentration of settlement not previously seen in the archeological
record and strong evidence for year-round occupation. This includes
floral and faunal data, as well as an array of site locations (and
orientations) in each core area that fits the known range of seasonally
exploited resources (Francis P. McManamon, ed. Chapters in the
Archaeology of Cape Cod, Volumes I and II, 1984). Concomitant with this
evidence for year-round occupation are mortuary data that indicate a
significantly different pattern than evident on earlier sites. This
includes the use of defined cemeteries, as well as ossuaries, which
elsewhere in the Northeast are strongly
[[Page 30970]]
linked with sedentary, tribal people (McManamon, Bradley and Magennis,
The Indian Neck Ossuary, 1986). This pattern appears to occur elsewhere
along the southern end of the Gulf of Maine and along the southern New
England coast to Narragansett Bay and possibly beyond, and first
becomes visible during the late Middle Woodland and continues to
characterize Wampanoag subsistence patterns throughout the Late
Woodland[sol]Contact Periods.
Distinct patterns of material culture and distribution for late
Middle Woodland/Late Woodland sites such as the Rich site have been
documented by many researchers (Ross Moffett, ``A Review of Cape Cod
Archaeology,'' Bulletin of the Massachusetts Historical Society, XIX(1)
1957; William Ritchie The Archaeology of Martha's Vineyard, 1969;
McManamon 1984). ``[T]he first intensive peopling of the Cape region''
occurred during the Middle Woodland period and these sites were marked
by ``nearly all of the earlier shell heap and black midden
accumulations'' associated with grit-tempered pottery and stemmed
points (Moffett 1957: 5). Although minor changes in ceramic form and
decoration occur, current evidence indicates continuity rather than
change in the material culture of late Middle Woodland through Late
Woodland period sites (Ritchie 1969; McManamon 1984 I & II). The
Massachusetts Historical Commission notes that the presence of Large
Triangles is typical in Late Woodland Period assemblages (Michael J.
Connolly, Historic and Archaeological Resources of Cape Cod and the
Islands, 1987).
Various European explorers and settlers documented the presence of
Pokanoket (Wampanoag) people in southeastern Massachusetts, including
Cape Cod during the late 16th and early 17th century. Historical
sources used to identify Wellfleet inside Pamet[sol]Wampanoag territory
include William Wood, New England Prospect,1865; William Bradford, Of
Plymouth Plantation, 1987; and Daniel Gookin, Historical Collections of
the Indians in New England, 1970. Contemporary scholarship continues to
document the presence of Wampanoag[sol]Pamet people in this area
including, Trigger, Bruce, ed., Handbook of North American Indians,
v.15, 1978: 177-181, and Gibson, Susan B., ed., Burr's Hill: A
Seventeenth Century Wampanoag Burial Ground in Warren, Rhode
Island,1980. Wampanoag presence has also been demonstrated in the
Massachusetts Historical Commissions two volumes on Cape Cod and
Southeastern Massachusetts (Massachusetts Historical Commission 1982
Historic and Archaeological Resources of Southeast Massachusetts, and
1987 Historic and Archaeological Resources of Cape Cod and the
Islands).
Other critical sources that identify the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe as
the present-day descendants of these people include Russell Peters, The
Wampanoags of Mashpee, 1987; William S. Simmons, Spirit of the New
England Tribes: Indian History and Folklore, 1620-1984, 1986; and Jack
Campisi, The Mashpee Indians: Tribe on Trial, 1991. Writing about the
numerous Wampanoag communities throughout southeastern Massachusetts,
William Simmons explains, ``(F)rom the late seventeenth century to the
early twentieth century, many of these enclaves either coalesced with
others or simply died out, leaving two principal concentrations of
Wampanoag at Gay Head on Martha's Vineyard and at Mashpee.'' Russell
Peters' text is an important document from the perspective of the
Mashpee community documenting their continued existence as a tribe.
The Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe; Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah)
of Massachusetts; Assonet Band of the Wampanoag Nation, a non-federally
recognized Indian group, and Wampanoag Repatriation Confederation, a
non-federally recognized Indian group; provided verbal evidence during
consultations for the Rich Site to have existed within the ancestral
area of the Wampanoag.
Officials of the Robert S. Peabody Museum of Archaeology have
found, based on the preponderance of the evidence, including
consultation evidence and scholarship, that a shared group identity can
be reasonably traced between the inhabitants of the Rich site (19-BN-
163) for the periods represented in the museum's collections and the
present-day Wampanoag Tribes of Massachusetts.
Officials of the Robert S. Peabody Museum of Archaeology have
determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (9-10), the human remain
described above represent the physical remains of one individual of
Native American ancestry. Officials of the Robert S. Peabody Museum of
Archaeology also have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (2),
there is a relationship of shared group identity that can be reasonably
traced between the Native American human remains and the Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe and Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) of
Massachusetts. Furthermore, officials of the Robert S. Peabody Museum
of Archaeology have determined that there is a cultural relationship
between the Native American human remains and the Assonet Band of the
Wampanoag Nation, a non-federally recognized Indian group.
Representatives of any other Indian tribe that believes itself to
be culturally affiliated with the human remains should contact Malinda
S. Blustain, Director, Robert S. Peabody Museum of Archaeology,
Phillips Academy, Andover, MA 01810, telephone (978) 749-4490, before
June 30, 2008. Repatriation of the human remains to the Wampanoag
Repatriation Confederation on behalf of the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head
(Aquinnah) of Massachusetts, Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe, and Assonet Band
of the Wampanoag Nation, a non-federally recognized Indian group may
proceed after that date if no additional claimants come forward.
The Robert S. Peabody Museum of Archaeology is responsible for
notifying the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe; Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head
(Aquinnah) of Massachusetts; Assonet Band of the Wampanoag Nation, a
non-federally recognized Indian group; and Wampanoag Repatriation
Confederation, a non-federally recognized Indian group that this notice
has been published.
Dated: April 18, 2008
Sherry Hutt,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. E8-11993 Filed 5-28-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-50-S