User Fees for 2008 Crop Cotton Classification Services to Growers, 30734-30736 [08-1308]
Download as PDF
30734
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 104 / Thursday, May 29, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
continuous—like square footage,
number of bedrooms, or number of
bathrooms—or class variables, like
external condition (good, fair, etc.),
availability of air conditioning (yes, no),
or the particular COLA survey area in
which the rental unit is located. The
resulting hedonic regression allows
OPM to hold rental unit characteristics
constant between the COLA area and
the Washington, DC, area while
comparing rents. In other words, we use
hedonic regressions to compare rents for
non-identical but comparable rental
units by holding quality and quantity
constant, to the extent practical. It is not
practical to survey every characteristic
of a rental unit. For example, we do not
collect information on floor coverings,
size and types of windows, color of
bathroom fixtures, and size of closets.
Instead, working with the Survey
Implementation Committee, Technical
Advisory Committee, and COLA
Advisory Committees, we identified
over 80 characteristics that seem likely
to have an influence on rental prices.
Similarly, it is not desirable from a
statistical standpoint to use all 80-plus
characteristics in the hedonic
regressions. Therefore, OPM and the
Technical Advisory Committee, in
consultation with the Survey
Implementation Committee, developed
objective procedures to determine
which rental unit characteristics to
include in the regression equation.
Home Purchase Costs
One commenter believed OPM should
survey home purchase costs instead of
rental value. Under the Caraballo
settlement, the parties agreed to adopt a
rental equivalence approach similar to
the one the Bureau of Labor Statistics
uses for the Consumer Price Index.
Rental equivalence compares the shelter
value (rental value) of owned homes,
rather than total owner costs, because
the latter are influenced by the
investment value of the home (i.e., what
homeowners hope to realize as a profit
when they sell their homes). As a rule,
living-cost surveys do not compare how
consumers invest their money.
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Review
This rule has been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget in
accordance with Executive Order 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that this regulation will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
because the regulation will affect only
Federal agencies and employees.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 591
Government employees, Travel and
transportation expenses, Wages.
Office of Personnel Management.
Linda M. Springer,
Director.
Accordingly, OPM amends subpart B
of 5 CFR part 591 as follows:
I
PART 591—ALLOWANCES AND
DIFFERENTIALS
Subpart B—Cost-of-Living Allowance
and Post Differential—Nonforeign
Areas
1. The authority citation for subpart B
of 5 CFR part 591 continues to read as
follows:
I
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5941; E.O. 10000, 3
CFR, 1943–1948 Comp., p. 792; and E.O.
12510, 3 CFR, 1985 Comp., p. 338.
2. Revise appendix A of subpart B to
read as follows:
I
Appendix A to Subpart B of Part 591—
Places and Rates at Which Allowances
Are Paid
This appendix lists the places approved for
a cost-of-living allowance and shows the
authorized allowance rate for each area. The
allowance rate shown is paid as a percentage
of an employee’s rate of basic pay. The rates
are subject to change based on the results of
future surveys.
Allowance
rate
(percent)
Geographic coverage
State of Alaska:
City of Anchorage and 80-kilometer (50-mile) radius by road .........................................................................................................
City of Fairbanks and 80-kilometer (50-mile) radius by road ..........................................................................................................
City of Juneau and 80-kilometer (50-mile) radius by road ..............................................................................................................
Rest of the State ..............................................................................................................................................................................
State of Hawaii:
City and County of Honolulu ............................................................................................................................................................
Hawaii County, Hawaii .....................................................................................................................................................................
County of Kauai ................................................................................................................................................................................
County of Maui and County of Kalawao ..........................................................................................................................................
Territory of Guam and Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands ...............................................................................................
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico ................................................................................................................................................................
U.S. Virgin Islands ...................................................................................................................................................................................
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) will raise the user fees
for cotton producers for 2008 crop
cotton classification services under the
Cotton Statistics and Estimates Act.
These user fees also are authorized
under the Cotton Standards Act of 1923.
The 2007 user fee for this classification
service was $1.85 per bale. This rule
will raise the fee for the 2008 crop to
$2.00 per bale. This fee and the existing
reserve are sufficient to cover the costs
[AMS–CN–07–0092; CN–08–001]
RIN 0581–AC80
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Final rule.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
7 CFR Part 28
User Fees for 2008 Crop Cotton
Classification Services to Growers
AGENCY:
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
17:07 May 28, 2008
25
18
25
25
25
13
25
Agricultural Marketing Service
[FR Doc. E8–12020 Filed 5–28–08; 8:45 am]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
24
24
24
25
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM
29MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 104 / Thursday, May 29, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
of providing classification services,
including costs for administration and
supervision.
DATES: Effective July 1, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Darryl Earnest, Deputy Administrator,
Cotton and Tobacco Programs, AMS,
USDA, Room 2639–S, STOP 0224, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0224.
Telephone (202) 720–2145, facsimile
(202) 690–1718, or e-mail
darryl.earnest@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A
proposed rule detailing the revisions
was published in the Federal Register
on April 17, 2008 (73 FR 20842). A 15day comment period was provided for
interested persons to respond to the
proposed rule. One comment was
received from the National Cotton
Council in support of the fee increase.
(1) The fee represents a very small
portion of the cost-per-unit currently
borne by those entities utilizing the
services. (The 2007 user fee for
classification services was $1.85 per
bale; the fee for the 2008 crop would be
increased to $2.00 per bale; the 2008
crop is estimated at 14,000,000 bales.)
(2) The fee for services will not affect
competition in the marketplace; and
(3) The use of classification services is
voluntary. For the 2007 crop, 19,033,000
bales were produced; and, almost all of
these bales were voluntarily submitted
by growers for the classification service.
(4) Based on the average price paid to
growers for cotton from the 2006 crop of
47.3 cents per pound, 500 pound bales
of cotton are worth an average of
$236.50 each. The proposed user fee
increase for classification services, $2.00
per bale, is less than one percent of the
value of an average bale of cotton.
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be
not significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866; and, therefore has not
been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
Paperwork Reduction Act
In compliance with OMB regulations
(5 CFR part 1320), which implement the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520), the information
collection requirements contained in the
provisions to be amended by this final
rule have been previously approved by
OMB and were assigned OMB control
number 0581–AC80.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. It is not intended to
have retroactive effect. This rule will
not preempt any state or local laws,
regulations, or policies unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule. There are no administrative
procedures that must be exhausted prior
to any judicial challenge to the
provisions of this rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612) AMS has considered
the economic impact of this action on
small entities and has determined that
its implementation will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small businesses.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so
that small businesses will not be
disproportionately burdened. There are
an estimated 25,000 cotton growers in
the U.S. who voluntarily use the AMS
cotton classing services annually, and
the majority of these cotton growers are
small businesses under the criteria
established by the Small Business
Administration (13 CFR 121.201). The
increase above the 2007 crop level as
stated will not significantly affect small
businesses as defined in the RFA
because:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 May 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
Fees for Classification Under the Cotton
Statistics and Estimates Act of 1927
The user fee charged to cotton
producers for High Volume Instrument
(HVI) classification services under the
Cotton Statistics and Estimates Act (7
U.S.C. 473a) was $1.85 per bale during
the 2007 harvest season as determined
by using the formula provided in the
Uniform Cotton Classing Fees Act of
1987, as amended by Public Law 102–
237. The fees cover salaries, costs of
equipment and supplies, and other
overhead costs, including costs for
administration and supervision. The fee
structure for the 2007 crop year was
incorporated under the authority of the
Cotton Standards Act of 1923, by an
interim final rule effective October 1,
2007 (72 FR 56242).
This final rule establishes the user fee
charged to producers for HVI
classification at $2.00 per bale during
the 2008 harvest season.
The classification fees are based on
the prevailing method of classification
requested by producers during the
previous year. HVI classing was the
prevailing method of cotton
classification requested by producers in
2007. Therefore, the 2008 producers’
user fee for classification service is
based on the 2007 base fee for HVI
classification.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
30735
The fee was calculated by applying
the formula specified in the Uniform
Cotton Classing Fees Act of 1987, as
amended by Public Law 102–237 which
AMS also considers reasonable under
the authority of the Cotton Standards
Act of 1923. The 2007 base fee for HVI
classification exclusive of adjustments,
as provided by that Act, was $2.52 per
bale. An increase of 3.06 percent, or 7
cents per bale, due to the implicit price
deflator of the gross domestic product
added to the $2.52 would result in a
2008 base fee of $2.59 per bale. The
formula in the Act provides for the use
of the percentage change in the implicit
price deflator of the gross national
product (as indexed for the most recent
12-month period for which statistics are
available). However, gross national
product has been replaced by gross
domestic product by the Department of
Commerce as a more appropriate
measure for the short-term monitoring
and analysis of the U.S. economy.
The number of bales to be classed by
the United States Department of
Agriculture from the 2008 crop is
estimated at 14,000,000 bales. The 2008
base fee was decreased 15 percent based
on the estimated number of bales to be
classed (1 percent for every 100,000
bales or portion thereof above the base
of 12,500,000, limited to a maximum
decreased adjustment of 15 percent).
This percentage factor amounts to a 39
cents per bale reduction and was
subtracted from the 2008 base fee of
$2.59 per bale, resulting in a fee of $2.20
per bale.
However, with a fee of $2.20 per bale,
the projected operating reserve would
be 31.6 percent. The 1987 Act specifies
that the Secretary shall not establish a
fee which, when combined with other
sources of revenue, will result in a
projected operating reserve of more than
25 percent. Accordingly, the fee of $2.20
is reduced by 20 cents per bale, to $2.00
per bale, to provide an ending
accumulated operating reserve for the
fiscal year of not more than 25 percent
of the projected cost of operating the
program. This will establish the 2008
season fee at $2.00 per bale.
Accordingly, § 28.909, paragraph (b)
will reflect the increase of the HVI
classification fee to $2.00 per bale.
A 5 cent per bale discount will
continue to be applied to voluntary
centralized billing and collecting agents
as specified in § 28.909 (c).
Growers or their designated agents
receiving classification data will
continue to incur no additional fees if
classification data is requested only
once. The fee for each additional
retrieval of classification data in
§ 28.910 would remain at 5 cents per
E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM
29MYR1
30736
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 104 / Thursday, May 29, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
bale. The fee in § 28.910 (b) for an
owner receiving classification data from
the National database would remain at
5 cents per bale, and the minimum
charge of $5.00 for services provided per
monthly billing period would remain
the same. The provisions of § 28.910 (c)
concerning the fee for new classification
memoranda issued from the National
database for the business convenience of
an owner without reclassification of the
cotton will remain the same at 15 cents
per bale or a minimum of $5.00 per
sheet.
The fee for review classification in
§ 28.911 will increase to $2.00 per bale.
The fee for returning samples after
classification in § 28.911 would remain
at 40 cents per sample. This fee was
incorrectly referred to in the proposed
rule as 50 cents per sample.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 28
Administrative practice and
procedure, Cotton, Cotton samples,
Grades, Market news, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Standards,
Staples, Testing, Warehouses.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 28 is amended to
read as follows:
I
PART 28—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 28, subpart D, continues to read as
follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 51–65; 7 U.S.C. 471–
476.
2. In § 28.909, paragraph (b) is revised
to read as follows:
I
§ 28.909
Costs.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The cost of High Volume
Instrument (HVI) cotton classification
service to producers is $2.00 per bale.
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 28.911, the last sentence of
paragraph (a) is revised to read as
follows:
I
§ 28.911
Review classification.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
(a) * * * The fee for review
classification is $2.00 per bale.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: May 27, 2008.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 08–1308 Filed 5–27–08; 1:29 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 May 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Thrift Supervision
12 CFR Part 585
[OTS–2007–0008]
RIN 1550–AC14
Prohibited Service at Savings and
Loan Holding Companies Extension of
Expiration Date of Temporary
Exemption
Office of Thrift Supervision
(OTS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: OTS is revising its rules
implementing section 19(e) of the
Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDIA),
which prohibits any person who has
been convicted of any criminal offense
involving dishonesty, breach of trust, or
money laundering (or who has agreed to
enter into a pretrial diversion or similar
program in connection with a
prosecution for such an offense) from
holding certain positions with respect to
a savings and loan holding company
(SLHC). Specifically, OTS is extending
the expiration date of a temporary
exemption granted to persons who held
positions with respect to a SLHC as of
the date of the enactment of section
19(e). The revised expiration date for
the temporary exemption is November
3, 2008.
DATES: Effective Date: The final rule is
effective on May 29, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donna Deale, Director, Holding
Companies and Affiliates, Supervision
Policy, (202) 906–7488, Office of Thrift
Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20552.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 8,
2007, OTS published an interim final
rule adding 12 CFR part 585. This new
part implemented section 19(e) of the
FDIA, which prohibits any person who
has been convicted of any criminal
offense involving dishonesty, breach of
trust, or money laundering (or who has
agreed to enter into a pretrial diversion
or similar program in connection with a
prosecution for such an offense) from
holding certain positions with a SLHC.
Section 19(e) also authorizes the
Director of OTS to provide exemptions
from the prohibitions, by regulation or
order, if the exemption is consistent
with the purposes of the statute.
The interim final rule described the
actions that are prohibited under the
statute and prescribed procedures for
applying for an OTS order granting a
case-by-case exemption from the
prohibition. The rule also provided
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
regulatory exemptions to the
prohibitions, including a temporary
exemption for persons who held
positions with respect to a SLHC on
October 13, 2006, the date of enactment
of section 19(e). This temporary
exemption is set to expire on June 1,
2008, unless a case-by-case exemption is
filed prior to that expiration date.1
OTS is extending the expiration date
of the temporary exemption to
November 3, 2008. This extension will
avoid needless disruptions of SLHC
operations while OTS continues to
review the public comments and
develop a final rule addressing these
comments. OTS has concluded that this
extension of the exemption is consistent
with the purposes of section 19(e) of the
FDIA.
Regulatory Findings
Notice and Comment and Effective Date
For the reasons set out in the interim
final rule,2 OTS has concluded that:
Notice and comment on this extension
are unnecessary and contrary to the
public interest under section 552(b)(B)
of the Administrative Procedure Act;
there is good cause for making the
extension effective immediately under
section 553(d) of the APA; and the
delayed effective date requirements of
section 302 of the Riegle Community
Development and Regulatory
Improvement Act of 1994 (CDRIA) do
not apply.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
For the reasons stated in the interim
final rule,3 OTS has concluded that this
extension does not require an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), and that this
extension should not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities, as defined in the RFA.
Paperwork Reduction Act
OTS has determined that this
extension does not involve a change to
collections of information previously
approved under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
For the reasons stated in the interim
final rule,4 OTS has determined that
this extension will not result in
expenditures by state, local, and tribal
1 This temporary exemption originally was
scheduled to expire on September 5, 2007. OTS
extended the expiration date to March 1, 2008, 72
FR 50644 (Sept. 4, 2008) and to June 1, 2008, 73
FR 10985 (Feb. 29, 2008).
2 72 FR at 25953.
3 72 FR at 25953–54.
4 72 FR at 25954.
E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM
29MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 104 (Thursday, May 29, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30734-30736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-1308]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 28
[AMS-CN-07-0092; CN-08-001]
RIN 0581-AC80
User Fees for 2008 Crop Cotton Classification Services to Growers
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) will raise the user
fees for cotton producers for 2008 crop cotton classification services
under the Cotton Statistics and Estimates Act. These user fees also are
authorized under the Cotton Standards Act of 1923. The 2007 user fee
for this classification service was $1.85 per bale. This rule will
raise the fee for the 2008 crop to $2.00 per bale. This fee and the
existing reserve are sufficient to cover the costs
[[Page 30735]]
of providing classification services, including costs for
administration and supervision.
DATES: Effective July 1, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Darryl Earnest, Deputy Administrator,
Cotton and Tobacco Programs, AMS, USDA, Room 2639-S, STOP 0224, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-0224. Telephone (202)
720-2145, facsimile (202) 690-1718, or e-mail darryl.earnest@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposed rule detailing the revisions was
published in the Federal Register on April 17, 2008 (73 FR 20842). A
15-day comment period was provided for interested persons to respond to
the proposed rule. One comment was received from the National Cotton
Council in support of the fee increase.
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866; and, therefore has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. It is not intended to have retroactive effect.
This rule will not preempt any state or local laws, regulations, or
policies unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
There are no administrative procedures that must be exhausted prior to
any judicial challenge to the provisions of this rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612) AMS has considered the economic impact of
this action on small entities and has determined that its
implementation will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small businesses.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be
disproportionately burdened. There are an estimated 25,000 cotton
growers in the U.S. who voluntarily use the AMS cotton classing
services annually, and the majority of these cotton growers are small
businesses under the criteria established by the Small Business
Administration (13 CFR 121.201). The increase above the 2007 crop level
as stated will not significantly affect small businesses as defined in
the RFA because:
(1) The fee represents a very small portion of the cost-per-unit
currently borne by those entities utilizing the services. (The 2007
user fee for classification services was $1.85 per bale; the fee for
the 2008 crop would be increased to $2.00 per bale; the 2008 crop is
estimated at 14,000,000 bales.)
(2) The fee for services will not affect competition in the
marketplace; and
(3) The use of classification services is voluntary. For the 2007
crop, 19,033,000 bales were produced; and, almost all of these bales
were voluntarily submitted by growers for the classification service.
(4) Based on the average price paid to growers for cotton from the
2006 crop of 47.3 cents per pound, 500 pound bales of cotton are worth
an average of $236.50 each. The proposed user fee increase for
classification services, $2.00 per bale, is less than one percent of
the value of an average bale of cotton.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In compliance with OMB regulations (5 CFR part 1320), which
implement the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), the
information collection requirements contained in the provisions to be
amended by this final rule have been previously approved by OMB and
were assigned OMB control number 0581-AC80.
Fees for Classification Under the Cotton Statistics and Estimates Act
of 1927
The user fee charged to cotton producers for High Volume Instrument
(HVI) classification services under the Cotton Statistics and Estimates
Act (7 U.S.C. 473a) was $1.85 per bale during the 2007 harvest season
as determined by using the formula provided in the Uniform Cotton
Classing Fees Act of 1987, as amended by Public Law 102-237. The fees
cover salaries, costs of equipment and supplies, and other overhead
costs, including costs for administration and supervision. The fee
structure for the 2007 crop year was incorporated under the authority
of the Cotton Standards Act of 1923, by an interim final rule effective
October 1, 2007 (72 FR 56242).
This final rule establishes the user fee charged to producers for
HVI classification at $2.00 per bale during the 2008 harvest season.
The classification fees are based on the prevailing method of
classification requested by producers during the previous year. HVI
classing was the prevailing method of cotton classification requested
by producers in 2007. Therefore, the 2008 producers' user fee for
classification service is based on the 2007 base fee for HVI
classification.
The fee was calculated by applying the formula specified in the
Uniform Cotton Classing Fees Act of 1987, as amended by Public Law 102-
237 which AMS also considers reasonable under the authority of the
Cotton Standards Act of 1923. The 2007 base fee for HVI classification
exclusive of adjustments, as provided by that Act, was $2.52 per bale.
An increase of 3.06 percent, or 7 cents per bale, due to the implicit
price deflator of the gross domestic product added to the $2.52 would
result in a 2008 base fee of $2.59 per bale. The formula in the Act
provides for the use of the percentage change in the implicit price
deflator of the gross national product (as indexed for the most recent
12-month period for which statistics are available). However, gross
national product has been replaced by gross domestic product by the
Department of Commerce as a more appropriate measure for the short-term
monitoring and analysis of the U.S. economy.
The number of bales to be classed by the United States Department
of Agriculture from the 2008 crop is estimated at 14,000,000 bales. The
2008 base fee was decreased 15 percent based on the estimated number of
bales to be classed (1 percent for every 100,000 bales or portion
thereof above the base of 12,500,000, limited to a maximum decreased
adjustment of 15 percent). This percentage factor amounts to a 39 cents
per bale reduction and was subtracted from the 2008 base fee of $2.59
per bale, resulting in a fee of $2.20 per bale.
However, with a fee of $2.20 per bale, the projected operating
reserve would be 31.6 percent. The 1987 Act specifies that the
Secretary shall not establish a fee which, when combined with other
sources of revenue, will result in a projected operating reserve of
more than 25 percent. Accordingly, the fee of $2.20 is reduced by 20
cents per bale, to $2.00 per bale, to provide an ending accumulated
operating reserve for the fiscal year of not more than 25 percent of
the projected cost of operating the program. This will establish the
2008 season fee at $2.00 per bale.
Accordingly, Sec. 28.909, paragraph (b) will reflect the increase
of the HVI classification fee to $2.00 per bale.
A 5 cent per bale discount will continue to be applied to voluntary
centralized billing and collecting agents as specified in Sec. 28.909
(c).
Growers or their designated agents receiving classification data
will continue to incur no additional fees if classification data is
requested only once. The fee for each additional retrieval of
classification data in Sec. 28.910 would remain at 5 cents per
[[Page 30736]]
bale. The fee in Sec. 28.910 (b) for an owner receiving classification
data from the National database would remain at 5 cents per bale, and
the minimum charge of $5.00 for services provided per monthly billing
period would remain the same. The provisions of Sec. 28.910 (c)
concerning the fee for new classification memoranda issued from the
National database for the business convenience of an owner without
reclassification of the cotton will remain the same at 15 cents per
bale or a minimum of $5.00 per sheet.
The fee for review classification in Sec. 28.911 will increase to
$2.00 per bale.
The fee for returning samples after classification in Sec. 28.911
would remain at 40 cents per sample. This fee was incorrectly referred
to in the proposed rule as 50 cents per sample.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 28
Administrative practice and procedure, Cotton, Cotton samples,
Grades, Market news, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Standards, Staples, Testing, Warehouses.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 28 is amended to
read as follows:
PART 28--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 28, subpart D, continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 51-65; 7 U.S.C. 471-476.
0
2. In Sec. 28.909, paragraph (b) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 28.909 Costs.
* * * * *
(b) The cost of High Volume Instrument (HVI) cotton classification
service to producers is $2.00 per bale.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 28.911, the last sentence of paragraph (a) is revised to
read as follows:
Sec. 28.911 Review classification.
(a) * * * The fee for review classification is $2.00 per bale.
* * * * *
Dated: May 27, 2008.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 08-1308 Filed 5-27-08; 1:29 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P