Petition for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding, 30393 [E8-11775]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 27, 2008 / Notices removed potentially burdensome paperwork requirements by encouraging carriers to comply with the reporting requirements through electronic means. We believe that the clarifications adopted in the Order on Reconsideration significantly decrease the paperwork burden on carriers. Specifically, the Commission: (1) Clarified that Completing Carriers must provide the Payphone Service Provider (PSP) with adequate notice of an alternative compensation arrangement (ACA) prior to its effective date with sufficient time for the PSP to object to an ACA, and also prior to the termination of an ACA; (2) clarified any paperwork burdens imposed on carriers and allowed Completing Carriers to provide notice of ACAs on a clearinghouse’s Web site; (3) required Completing Carriers to report only completed calls in their quarterly reports; and (4) extended the time period from 18 to 27 months for Completing Carriers and Intermediate Carriers to retain certain payphone records. Federal Communications Commission. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary. [FR Doc. E8–11777 Filed 5–23–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION [Report No. 2867] Petition for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES May 16, 2008. A Petition for Reconsideration has been filed in the Commission’s Rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published pursuant to 47 CFR section 1.429(e). The full text of this document is available for viewing and copying in Room CY–B402, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission’s copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1–800– 378–3160). Oppositions to this petition must be filed by June 11, 2008. See section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission’s rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired. Subject: In the Matter of: Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service (CC Docket No. 96–45); Access Charge Reform (CC Docket No. 96–262) (WC Docket No. 06–122). VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:22 May 23, 2008 Jkt 214001 Number of Petitions Filed: 1. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary. [FR Doc. E8–11775 Filed 5–23–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION Guidelines for Appeals of Material Supervisory Determinations Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. ACTION: Notice and request for comment. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) proposes to amend its Guidelines for Appeals of Material Supervisory Determinations to better align the FDIC’s Supervisory Appeals Review Committee (SARC) process with the material supervisory determinations appeals procedures at the other Federal banking agencies. The proposed amendments would modify the supervisory determinations eligible for appeal to eliminate the ability of an FDIC-supervised institution to file an appeal with the SARC with respect to determinations or the facts and circumstances underlying a formal enforcement-related action or decision, including the initiation of an investigation. The proposed amendments also include limited technical amendments. DATES: Written comments on the Proposal must be received by the FDIC on or before July 28, 2008 for consideration. ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments to the FDIC by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Agency Web Site: https:// www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/federal/ propose.html. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • E-mail: comments@fdic.gov. Include ‘‘Guidelines for Appeals of Material Supervisory Determinations’’ in the subject line of the message. • Mail: Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary, Attention: Comments/Legal ESS, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20429. • Hand Delivery: Comments may be hand-delivered to the guard station located at the rear of the FDIC’s 550 17th Street building (accessible from F Street) on business days between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 30393 Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and use the title ‘‘Guidelines for Appeals of Material Supervisory Determinations.’’ All comments received will be posted without change to, https://www.fdic.gov/ regulations/laws/federal/propose.html, including any personal information provided. Comments may be inspected and photocopied in the FDIC Public Information Center, Room E–1002, 3501 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22226 between 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. on business days. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Gray, Section Chief, FDIC, 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20429 [F–4054]; telephone: (202) 898–3508; or electronic mail: fgray@fdic.gov; or Richard Bogue, Counsel, FDIC, 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20429 [MB–3014]; telephone: (202) 898–3726; facsimile: (202) 898–3658; or electronic mail: rbogue@fdic.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FDIC is publishing for notice and comment proposed amendments to the Guidelines for Appeals of Material Supervisory Determinations. The FDIC considers it desirable in this instance to garner comments regarding these amendments to the guidelines, although notice and comment is not required and may not be employed in any future amendments. The proposed amendments would be effective upon adoption and are intended to more closely align the FDIC’s Guidelines for Appeals of Material Supervisory Determinations to the material supervisory determination appeals processes of the other Federal banking agencies. Background Section 309(a) of the Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994 (Pub. L. 103–325, 108 Stat. 2160) (Riegle Act), required the FDIC (as well as the other Federal banking agencies and the National Credit Union Administration Board (NCUA)) to establish an independent intra-agency appellate process to review material supervisory determinations. The Riegle Act defines the term ‘‘independent appellate process’’ to mean a review by an agency official who does not directly or indirectly report to the agency official who made the material supervisory determination under review. In the appeals process, the FDIC is required to ensure that (1) an appeal of a material supervisory determination by an insured depository institution is heard and decided expeditiously; and (2) appropriate safeguards exist for E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM 27MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 102 (Tuesday, May 27, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 30393]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-11775]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2867]


Petition for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding

May 16, 2008.
    A Petition for Reconsideration has been filed in the Commission's 
Rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published 
pursuant to 47 CFR section 1.429(e). The full text of this document is 
available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th Street, 
SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1-800-378-3160). 
Oppositions to this petition must be filed by June 11, 2008. See 
section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies 
to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing 
oppositions has expired.
    Subject: In the Matter of: Federal-State Joint Board on Universal 
Service (CC Docket No. 96-45); Access Charge Reform (CC Docket No. 96-
262) (WC Docket No. 06-122).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 1.

Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-11775 Filed 5-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.