Clean Air Act Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plan Revision for North Dakota; Revisions to the Air Pollution Control Rules and Alternative Monitoring Plan for Mandan Refinery; Delegation of Authority for New Source Performance Standards, 30308-30316 [E8-11479]
Download as PDF
30308
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 27, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 60
[EPA–R08–OAR–2007–0617; FRL–8570–2]
Clean Air Act Approval and
Promulgation of Air Quality
Implementation Plan Revision for
North Dakota; Revisions to the Air
Pollution Control Rules and Alternative
Monitoring Plan for Mandan Refinery;
Delegation of Authority for New Source
Performance Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule and delegation
of authority.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action approving revisions to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) as submitted
by the Governor of North Dakota with a
letter dated March 8, 2007. The
revisions affect certain air pollution
control rules regarding general
provisions, open burning restrictions,
permitting, and fugitive emissions. In
addition, we are approving a revision to
a chapter of the SIP regarding an
alternative monitoring plan for the
Tesoro Mandan Refinery. This action is
being taken under section 110 of the
Clean Air Act. EPA is also providing
notice that on August 22, 2007, North
Dakota was delegated authority to
implement and enforce certain New
Source Performance Standards as in
effect on January 31, 2006.
DATES: This action is effective on July
28, 2008 without further notice, unless
EPA receives adverse comment by June
26, 2008. If adverse comment is
received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register informing the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08–
OAR–2007–0617, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: Platt.Amy@epa.gov.
• Fax: (303) 312–6064 (please alert
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section if you are
faxing comments).
• Mail: Callie Videtich, Director, Air
Program, Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–
AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202–1129.
• Hand Delivery: Director, Air
Program, Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:07 May 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202–1129. Such deliveries
are only accepted Monday through
Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays. Special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R08–OAR–2007–
0617. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA, without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
For additional instructions on
submitting comments, go to section I.
General Information of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the Air Program, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the individual
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to view the hard copy
of the docket. You may view the hard
copy of the docket Monday through
Friday, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Platt, EPA Region 8, at (303) 312–
6449, or Platt.Amy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. General Information
II. Background
III. Revisions in the March 8, 2007 Submittal
That Are the Subject of This Document
IV. Delegation of Authority
V. Section 110(l)
VI. Final Action
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Review
Definitions
For the purpose of this document, we
are giving meaning to certain words or
initials as follows:
(i) The words or initials Act or CAA
mean or refer to the Clean Air Act,
unless the context indicates otherwise.
(ii) The words EPA, we, us or our
mean or refer to the United States
Environmental Protection Agency.
(iii) The initials SIP mean or refer to
State Implementation Plan.
(iv) The words State or ND mean the
State of North Dakota, unless the
context indicates otherwise.
(v) The initials NDDH mean or refer
to the North Dakota Department of
Health.
I. General Information
A. What Should I Consider as I Prepare
My Comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through https://
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD–ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
E:\FR\FM\27MYR1.SGM
27MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 27, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
a. Identify the rulemaking by docket
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
b. Follow directions—The agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
c. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
d. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
e. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
f. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns, and suggest
alternatives.
g. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
h. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
II. Background
The Act requires States to follow
certain procedures in developing
implementation plans and plan
revisions for submission to us. Sections
110(a)(2) and 110(l) of the Act provide
that each implementation plan must be
adopted after reasonable notice and
public hearing.
To provide for public comment, the
North Dakota Department of Health
(NDDH), after providing notice, held a
public hearing on May 4, 2006 to
consider the revisions to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) and Air
Pollution Control Rules. Following the
public hearing, comment period, and
legal review by the North Dakota
Attorney General’s Office, NDDH
adopted the revisions. The revisions to
the Air Pollution Control Rules became
effective on January 1, 2007 and the
revision to the SIP chapter regarding an
alternative monitoring plan for the
Tesoro Mandan Refinery became
effective on February 27, 2007. The
North Dakota Governor submitted the
SIP revisions to us with a letter dated
March 8, 2007.
III. Revisions in the March 8, 2007
Submittal That Are the Subject of This
Document
The revisions in the March 8, 2007
submittal to be addressed in this
document pertain to certain portions of
the North Dakota Air Pollution Control
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:07 May 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
Rules regarding general provisions,
open burning, permitting, and fugitive
emissions. These revisions involve the
following chapters of the North Dakota
Administrative Code (N.D.A.C.): 33–14–
01 General Provisions; 33–15–04 Open
Burning Restrictions; 33–15–14
Designated Air Contaminant Sources,
Permit to Construct, Minor Source
Permit to Operate, Title V Permit to
Operate (certain sections specific to
permit to construct); and 33–15–17
Restriction of Fugitive Emissions. In
addition, the March 8, 2007 submittal
included a revision to SIP Chapter 8,
Source Surveillance, to provide an
alternative monitoring plan for the
Tesoro Mandan Refinery.
A. Chapter 33–15–01, N.D.A.C., General
Provisions
Sections 33–15–01–04 and 33–15–01–
05 were revised. In section 33–15–01–
04, the baseline date for the
incorporation by reference of the
Federal definition of ‘‘volatile organic
compounds,’’ located at 40 CFR
51.100(s), was updated to January 1,
2006. In section 33–15–01–05, a slight
editorial change was made to the
meaning of the abbreviation for PM10.
These revisions were made to match
Federal requirements and are
approvable.
B. Chapter 33–15–04, N.D.A.C., Open
Burning Restrictions
Sections 33–15–04–01 and 33–15–04–
02 were revised. Section 33–15–04–01,
Refuse Burning Restrictions, was
revised to clarify that the burning of
trade waste is not allowed. As defined
in the General Provisions chapter (33–
15–01–04, N.D.A.C.), trade waste means
solid, liquid, or gaseous waste material
resulting from construction or the
conduct of any business, trade, or
industry, or any demolition operation,
including wood, wood containing
preservatives, plastics, cartons, grease,
oil, chemicals, and cinders.
In section 33–15–04–02, Permissible
Open Burning, a reference to the North
Dakota Rural Fire Contingency Plan was
removed since this document no longer
exists. In addition, changes were made
to limit approval of open burning to
abate a fire hazard to the NDDH or its
designee, as well as to require State and
Federal agencies that conduct
prescribed burning to submit an annual
report upon request by NDDH. Finally,
a notification requirement was replaced
by a requirement that prohibits open
burning when a burning ban is declared
by State or local officials.
These changes clarified existing rules,
eliminated out-of-date references, and
added reporting requirements for State
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
30309
and Federal prescribed burning. These
revisions are approvable.
C. Chapter 33–15–14, N.D.A.C.,
Designated Air Contaminant Sources,
Permit To Construct, Minor Source
Permit To Operate, Title V Permit To
Operate (Certain Sections Specific To
Permit To Construct)
In the Permit to Construct section, 33–
15–14–02, subdivision 33–15–14–
02.13.c was revised. These revisions
relate to certain sources that will now be
exempt from requirements for a permit
to construct. Specifically, an exemption
was added for any internal combustion
engine, or multiple engines at the same
facility, with a total combined actual
emission rate of 5 tons per year or less
of any air contaminant for which an
ambient air quality standard has been
promulgated in section 33–15–02–04.
Given that this revision reduces the
stringency of the rule, EPA requested a
demonstration that the revision will not
interfere with attainment and
maintenance of the National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS),
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
of Air Quality Increments (PSD
Increments), or any other requirement of
the Clean Air Act.
In a July 7, 2006 letter from Terry
O’Clair, NDDH, to Richard Long, EPA,
NDDH provided results from a
SCREEN3 1 modeling run which shows
that a typical internal combustion
engine emitting 5 tons a year of nitrogen
dioxide (NO2) will not violate the
NAAQS or PSD increments. Based on
AP–42 emission factors for this type of
engine, NO2 has the larger emission rate
and would be the pollutant of concern,
while CO and PM emission rates are
much lower for such engines and would
not be expected to threaten the NAAQS
or PSD increments. As a result, EPA is
satisfied that this revision will not
adversely impact the NAAQS or PSD
increments. Therefore, this revision is
approvable.
In addition, subdivision 33–15–14–
02.13.o was revised to remove a
reference to subdivision n of subsection
1 of section 33–15–14–06. Section 33–
15–14–06, subsection 1, contains the
State’s definitions for the Title V
operating permits program. The
previous reference to subdivision n was
to the definition of ‘‘major source,’’ and
the purpose of the reference was to
define oil and gas production facilities
that either were or were not major
sources. Now the definition of ‘‘major
1 SCREEN3 is a single source Gaussian plume
screening model which provides, among other
things, maximum ground-level concentrations for
point, area, flare, and volume sources.
E:\FR\FM\27MYR1.SGM
27MYR1
30310
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 27, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
source’’ is found at subdivision o.
Rather than include a reference to a new
subdivision letter that might change
again, the State changed the reference to
be at the more general subsection level.
This was purely a housekeeping change
and is approvable.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
D. Chapter 33–15–17, N.D.A.C.,
Restriction of Fugitive Emissions
A provision was added to section 33–
15–17–02 to restrict fugitive particulate
emissions that would have an adverse
impact on visibility on any Class I
Federal area. The NDDH made this
revision to help prevent degradation of
visibility in Theodore Roosevelt
National Park and Lostwood Wilderness
Area due to fugitive emissions. This
revision is approvable.
E. SIP Chapter 8, ‘‘Source Surveillance,’’
Section 8.3.1, ‘‘Continuous Opacity
Monitoring for Fluid Bed Catalytic
Cracking Units: Tesoro Refining and
Marketing Co., Mandan Refinery’’
The Tesoro Refining and Marketing
Company (Tesoro) currently operates a
fluidized bed catalytic cracking unit
(FCCU) at the Mandan Refinery. The
refinery was constructed in the 1950s
and is required to continuously monitor
the opacity of emissions from the FCCU
according to 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix
P, and North Dakota SIP Chapter 8,
Source Surveillance. In May 1977, the
NDDH issued an order requiring the
installation and operation of continuous
opacity monitoring (COM) equipment
for emissions from the FCCU, and the
opacity has been continuously
monitored since the compliance date of
September 30, 1978.
In 2001, Tesoro entered into a
Consent Decree with EPA to settle
allegations of noncompliance under the
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
Program. As part of this settlement,
Tesoro was required to control SO2
emissions from the FCCU. Tesoro
installed a wet scrubber and wet
electrostatic precipitator (ESP) to
comply with the terms of the Consent
Decree. The large amount of moisture
from the control system has made
monitoring of the opacity of emissions
using COM equipment infeasible.
Specifically, water droplets contained in
the flue gas could potentially result in
the monitor overstating the true opacity.
Therefore, Tesoro requested alternative
monitoring procedures and
requirements in accordance with 40
CFR Part 51, Appendix P, Section 6.0.
The NDDH and EPA agreed with Tesoro
that such alternative monitoring
procedures and requirements were
warranted given that the excess
moisture in the stack from the wet
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:07 May 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
scrubber interferes with the COM and
makes the COM data inaccurate.
As a result, NDDH revised SIP
Chapter 8, ‘‘Source Surveillance,’’
Section 8.3, ‘‘Continuous Emission
Monitoring Requirements for Existing
Stationary Sources, including
amendments to Permits to Operate and
Department Order.’’ The revision
provided for a new Section 8.3.1,
‘‘Continuous Opacity Monitoring for
Fluid Bed Catalytic Cracking Units:
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Co.,
Mandan Refinery.’’ This new section
provides alternative monitoring
procedures and requirements for the
Tesoro Mandan refinery. Tesoro has
demonstrated through Method 9
measurements that the FCCU will easily
comply with the visible emissions limit
of 40% opacity when the scrubber flow
rate is at least 2511 gallons per minute
(gpm). Therefore, the alternative
monitoring plan requires that liquid
flow through the wet scrubber at 2511
gpm, or more, on an hourly average
basis. If the flow rate is less than 2511
gpm, Tesoro must conduct a Method 9
test each day until the required flow rate
is achieved.
In addition, Section 8.3.1 contains,
among other things, the following
requirements:
1. Tesoro must monitor the liquid
flow rate through the wet gas scrubber
on a continuous basis.
2. Tesoro must keep records of the
liquid flow rate on a continuous basis,
and keep such records for at least five
years.
3. Tesoro must submit semi-annual
deviations reports for the FCCU, listing
any time period monitoring is not
conducted as outlined in Section 8.3.1
and any time monitoring indicates the
required flow rate is not attained.
Tesoro must also submit an annual
certification indicating compliance with
the visible emissions limit.
EPA interprets these provisions such
that a failure to maintain a liquid flow
rate through the wet scrubber of at least
2511 gpm, one-hour average, is a
violation of the SIP.
This alternative monitoring plan was
finalized between Tesoro and NDDH on
February 27, 2007, and approved by the
director of EPA Region 8’s Technical
Enforcement Program in an August 24,
2007 letter from Cynthia Reynolds (on
behalf of Martin Hestmark) to Ron W.
Day, Tesoro Refining and Marketing
Company. EPA is satisfied that this
alternative monitoring plan will ensure
Tesoro complies with the requirements
of 40 CFR 51.214 and 40 CFR Part 51,
Appendix P, to continuously monitor
opacity emissions and will be adequate
to ensure Tesoro complies with the SIP
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
opacity limits that apply to the FCCU at
the Mandan Refinery. Accordingly, this
approval ratifies the Region 8 Technical
Enforcement Program’s approval of the
alternative monitoring procedures and
requirements reflected in new Section
8.3.1 of the North Dakota SIP.
IV. Section 110(l)
Section 110(l) of the Clean Air Act
states that a SIP revision cannot be
approved if the revision would interfere
with any applicable requirement
concerning attainment and reasonable
further progress towards attainment of
the National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) or any other
applicable requirements of the Act.
There are no nonattainment areas in
North Dakota. The revisions to the
general provisions, open burning
restrictions, and fugitive emissions
provisions are consistent with Federal
requirements, clarifying in nature, and
will not interfere with requirements of
the Act related to administrative or
procedural provisions. Although the
revision to the permitting provisions
reduces the stringency of the rule, the
State has adequately demonstrated
through modeling that it will not
adversely impact the NAAQS or PSD
Increments. The revisions to SIP
Chapter 8, regarding the alternative
monitoring plan for Tesoro’s Mandan
refinery, adequately detail monitoring
parameters, frequency of monitoring,
wet gas scrubber flow rate requirements,
recordkeeping, and reporting
requirements to ensure that the refinery
can comply with requirements to
continuously monitor opacity emissions
and will be adequate to ensure Tesoro
complies with the SIP opacity limits
that apply to the FCCU at the Mandan
Refinery. Therefore, these revisions do
not interfere with attainment or
maintenance of the NAAQS or other
applicable requirements of the Act.
V. Delegation of Authority
With a July 17, 2007 letter, the
Governor of North Dakota requested
delegation of authority for revisions to
the New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS), promulgated in Chapter 33–15–
12, N.D.A.C. On August 22, 2007,
delegation was given with the following
letter:
Ref: 8P–AR
Terry O’Clair, Director, Division of Air
Quality, Environmental Health Section,
North Dakota Department of Health, 918
E. Divide Avenue, Bismarck, ND 58501–
1947
Re: Delegation of Clean Air Act New Source
Performance Standards
E:\FR\FM\27MYR1.SGM
27MYR1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 27, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Dear Mr. O’Clair: With Governor Hoeven’s
July 17, 2007 letter and your July 18, 2007
letter, the State of North Dakota submitted
revisions to its Air Pollution Control Rules
and requested, among other things, direct
delegation to implement and enforce the
Federal New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS). Specifically, North Dakota
Administrative Code Chapter 33–15–12,
Standards of Performance of New Stationary
Sources, was revised to update the citation
for the incorporated Federal NSPS in 40 CFR
Part 60 as those in effect on January 31, 2006,
with the exception of subparts Eb, L, M, N,
Na, P, Q, R, S, and BB, which have not been
adopted by the State.
Subsequent to States adopting NSPS
regulations, EPA delegates the authority for
the implementation and enforcement of those
NSPS, so long as the States’ regulations are
equivalent to the Federal regulations. EPA
reviewed the pertinent statutes and
regulations of the State of North Dakota and
determined that they provide an adequate
and effective procedure for the
implementation and enforcement of the
NSPS by the State. Therefore, pursuant to
Section 111(c) of the Clean Air Act (Act), as
amended, and 40 CFR Part 60, EPA hereby
delegates its authority for the implementation
and enforcement of the NSPS to the State of
North Dakota as follows:
(A) Responsibility for all sources located,
or to be located, in the State of North Dakota
subject to the standards of performance for
new stationary sources promulgated in 40
CFR Part 60. The categories of new stationary
sources covered by this delegation are all
NSPS subparts in 40 CFR Part 60, as in effect
on January 31, 2006, with the exception of
subparts Eb, L, M, N, Na, P, Q, R, S, and BB,
which have not been adopted by the State.
Note this delegation does not include the
emission guidelines in subparts Cb, Cc, Cd,
Ce, BBBB, DDDD, and HHHH. These subparts
require state plans, which are approved
under a separate process pursuant to Section
111(d) of the Act.
(B) Not all authorities of NSPS can be
delegated to States under Section 111(c) of
the Act, as amended. The EPA Administrator
retains authority to implement those sections
of the NSPS that require: (1) Approving
equivalency determinations and alternative
test methods, (2) decision-making to ensure
national consistency, and (3) EPA rulemaking
in order to implement. Enclosed with this
letter is a list of examples of sections in 40
CFR Part 60 related to the NSPS being
delegated in this letter that cannot be
delegated to the State of North Dakota. Please
note that the enclosed list has been updated
since our July 27, 2005 delegation of
authority to implement and enforce the NSPS
to the State of North Dakota.
(C) The North Dakota Department of Health
(NDDH) and EPA will continue a system of
communication sufficient to guarantee that
each office is always kept informed and
current regarding compliance status of the
subject sources and interpretation of the
regulations.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:07 May 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
(D) Enforcement of the NSPS in the State
will be the primary responsibility of the
NDDH. If the NDDH determines that such
enforcement is not feasible and so notifies
EPA, or where the NDDH acts in a manner
inconsistent with the terms of this
delegation, EPA may exercise its concurrent
enforcement authority pursuant to section
113 of the Act, as amended, with respect to
sources within the State of North Dakota
subject to NSPS.
(E) The State of North Dakota will at no
time grant a variance or waiver from
compliance with NSPS regulations. Should
NDDH grant such a variance or waiver, EPA
will consider the source receiving such relief
to be in violation of the applicable Federal
regulation and initiate enforcement action
against the source pursuant to section 113 of
the Act. The granting of such relief by the
NDDH shall also constitute grounds for
revocation of the delegation by EPA.
(F) If at any time there is a conflict between
a State regulation and a Federal regulation
(40 CFR Part 60), the Federal regulation must
be applied if it is more stringent than that of
the State. If the State does not have the
authority to enforce the more stringent
Federal regulation, this portion of the
delegation may be revoked.
(G) If the Regional Administrator
determines that a State procedure for
enforcing or implementing the NSPS is
inadequate, or is not being effectively carried
out, this delegation may be revoked in whole
or part. Any such revocation shall be
effective as of the date specified in a Notice
of Revocation to the NDDH.
(H) Acceptance of this delegation of
presently promulgated NSPS does not
commit the State of North Dakota to accept
delegation of future standards and
requirements. A new request for delegation
will be required for any standards not
included in the State’s July 17, 2007 letter.
(I) Upon approval of the Regional
Administrator of EPA Region 8, the Director
of NDDH may sub-delegate his authority to
implement and enforce the NSPS to local air
pollution control authorities in the State
when such authorities have demonstrated
that they have equivalent or more stringent
programs in force.
(J) The State of North Dakota must require
reporting of all excess emissions from any
NSPS source in accordance with 40 CFR Part
60.7(c).
(K) Performance tests shall be scheduled
and conducted in accordance with the
procedures set forth in 40 CFR Part 60 unless
alternate methods or procedures are
approved by the EPA Administrator.
Although the Administrator retains the
exclusive right to approve equivalent and
alternate test methods as specified in 40 CFR
Part 60.8(b)(2) and (3), the State may approve
minor changes in methodology provided
these changes are reported to EPA Region 8.
The Administrator also retains the right to
change the opacity standard as specified in
40 CFR Part 60.11(e).
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
30311
(L) Determinations of applicability, such as
those specified in 40 CFR Part 60.5 and
review of plans, as provided for in 40 CFR
Part 60.6, shall be consistent with those
determinations already made and reviews
conducted by the EPA.
(M) Alternatives to continuous monitoring
procedures or reporting requirements, as
outlined in 40 CFR Part 60.13(i), may be
approved by the State only if the specific
NSPS grants that authority. Otherwise, EPA
retains the authority to review and approve
such alternatives.
(N) If a source proposes to modify its
operation or facility which may cause the
source to be subject to NSPS requirements,
the State shall notify EPA Region 8 and
obtain a determination on the applicability of
the NSPS regulations.
(O) Information shall be made available to
the public in accordance with 40 CFR Part
60.9. Any records, reports, or information
provided to, or otherwise obtained by, the
State in accordance with the provisions of
these regulations shall be made available to
the designated representatives of EPA upon
request.
(P) All reports required pursuant to the
delegated NSPS should not be submitted to
the EPA Region 8 office, but rather to the
NDDH.
(Q) As 40 CFR Part 60 is updated, North
Dakota should revise its regulations
accordingly and in a timely manner and
submit to EPA requests for updates to its
delegation of authority.
EPA is approving North Dakota’s request
for NSPS delegation for all areas within the
State except for the following: Lands within
the exterior boundaries of the Fort Berthold,
Fort Totten, Standing Rock and Turtle
Mountain Indian Reservations; and any other
areas which are ‘‘Indian Country’’ within the
meaning of 18 U.S.C. 1151.
Since this delegation is effective
immediately, there is no need for the State
to notify the EPA of its acceptance. Unless
we receive written notice of objections from
you within ten days of the date on which you
receive this letter, the State of North Dakota
will be deemed to accept all the terms of this
delegation. To inform the public of this
delegation, EPA will publish an information
notice in the Federal Register in which this
letter will appear in its entirety.
If you have any questions on this matter,
please contact me at (303) 312–6241 or Callie
Videtich, Director of our Air and Radiation
Program, at (303) 312–6434, or toll-free at 1–
800–227–8917.
Sincerely,
Stephen S. Tuber
Assistant Regional Administrator
Office of Partnerships and
Regulatory Assistance
Enclosure
cc: Tom Bachman, NDDH
Enclosure to Letter Delegating NSPS in 40
CFR Part 60, Effective Through January
31, 2006, to the State of North Dakota
E:\FR\FM\27MYR1.SGM
27MYR1
30312
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 27, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
EXAMPLES OF AUTHORITIES IN 40 CFR PART 60 WHICH CANNOT BE DELEGATED
40 CFR
subparts
Section(s)
A ..................................
60.8(b)(2) and (b)(3), and those sections throughout the standards that reference 60.8(b)(2) and (b)(3); 60.11(b) and
(e); and 60.13(i).
60.47Da.
60.44b(f), 60.44b(g) and 60.49b(a)(4).
60.48c(a)(4).
60.56c(i), 60.8.
60.105(a)(13)(iii) and 60.106(i)(12).
60.114a.
60.111b(f)(4), 60.114b, 60.116b(e)(3)(iii), 60.116b(e)(3)(iv), and 60.116b(f)(2)(iii).
60.153(e).
60.302(d)(3).
60.332(a)(4) and 60.335(b)(10)(ii).
60.482–1(c)(2) and 60.484.
60.493(b)(2)(i)(A) and 60.496(a)(1).
60.502(e)(6).
60.531, 60.533, 60.534, 60.535, 60.536(i)(2), 60.537, 60.538(e), and 60.539.
60.543(c)(2)(ii)(B).
60.562–2(c).
60.592(c).
60.613(e).
60.623.
60.634.
60.663(f).
60.694.
60.703(e).
60.711(a)(16), 60.713(b)(1)(i) and (ii), 60.713(b)(5)(i), 60.713(d), 60.715(a) and 60.716.
60.723(b)(1), 60.723(b)(2)(i)(C), 60.723(b)(2)(iv), 60.724(e) and 60.725(b).
60.743(a)(3)(v)(A) and (B), 60.743(e), 60.745(a) and 60.746.
60.754(a)(5).
60.2030(c)(1) through (7).
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Da ................................
Db ................................
Dc ................................
Ec ................................
J ...................................
Ka ................................
Kb ................................
O ..................................
DD ...............................
GG ...............................
VV ................................
WW ..............................
XX ................................
AAA .............................
BBB .............................
DDD .............................
GGG ............................
III .................................
JJJ ...............................
KKK .............................
NNN .............................
QQQ ............................
RRR .............................
SSS .............................
TTT ..............................
VVV .............................
WWW ..........................
CCCC ..........................
VI. Final Action
EPA is approving revisions to the
North Dakota SIP that involve certain
portions of the North Dakota Air
Pollution Control Rules regarding
general provisions, open burning,
permitting, and fugitive emissions, as
submitted by the Governor of North
Dakota with a letter dated March 8,
2007. Specifically, EPA approves
revisions to the following portions of
the North Dakota Administrative Code
(N.D.A.C.): Chapter 33–15–01, General
Provisions, sections 33–15–01–04 and
33–15–01–05; Chapter 33–15–04, Open
Burning Restrictions, sections 33–15–
04–01 and 33–15–04–02; Chapter 33–
15–14, Designated Air Contaminant
Sources, Permit to Construct, Minor
Source Permit to Operate, Title V Permit
to Operate, subsections 33–15–14–
02.13.c. and 33–15–14–02.13.o. (certain
sections specific to permit to construct);
and Chapter 33–15–17, Restriction of
Fugitive Emissions, subsection 33–15–
17–02. In addition, EPA approves
revisions to North Dakota SIP Chapter 8,
‘‘Source Surveillance,’’ also submitted
by the Governor of North Dakota with
his March 8, 2007 letter. Specifically
EPA approves Section 8.3.1,
‘‘Continuous Opacity Monitoring for
Fluid Bed Catalytic Cracking Units:
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Co.,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:07 May 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
Mandan Refinery.’’ EPA is publishing
this rule without prior proposal because
the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial amendment and
anticipates no adverse comment.
However, in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’
section of today’s Federal Register, EPA
is publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposal to approve the
SIP revision if adverse comments are
filed. This rule will be effective on July
28, 2008 without further notice unless
EPA receives adverse comment by June
26, 2008. If EPA receives adverse
comment, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. EPA will address all
public comments in a subsequent final
rule based on the proposed rule. EPA
will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at
this time. Please note that if EPA
receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
VII. Statutory and Executive Order
Review
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
E:\FR\FM\27MYR1.SGM
27MYR1
30313
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 27, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by July 28, 2008.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
Clean Air Act. This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: May 7, 2008.
Carol Rushin,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8.
40 CFR part 52 is amended to read as
follows:
I
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart JJ—North Dakota
2. Section 52.1820 is amended to read
as follows:
I a. In the table in paragraph (c) by:
I i. Revising the entries for ‘‘33–15–01–
04;’’ ‘‘33–15–01–5;’’ ‘‘33–15–04–01;’’
‘‘33–15–04–02;’’ ‘‘33–15–14–02;’’ and
‘‘33–15–17–02.’’
I ii. Adding entries in numerical order
for ‘‘33–15–04–02.1.b, 33–15–04–02.1.e,
33–15–04–02.1.g, and 33–15–04–
02.2.k;’’ and ‘‘33–15–14–02.13.c and 33–
15–14–02.13.o.’’
I iii. Removing the entry for ‘‘33–15–
14–02.5, 33–15–14–02.13.c, and 33–15–
14–02.13.i(5)’’ and adding in its place a
new entry for ‘‘33–15–14–02.5 and 33–
15–14–02.13.i(5).’’
I b. In paragraph (d) by revising the
table.
I c. In the table in paragraph (e) by
revising the entry ‘‘(1)’’ and by adding
entry ‘‘(20)’’ in numerical order.
I
§ 52.1820
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
(c) EPA approved regulations.
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA REGULATIONS
Title/subject
State effective
date
EPA approval date
and citation 2
*
33–15–01–04 ..........
*
*
Definitions ..............................................
*
*
Abbreviations .........................................
*
5/27/08, [Insert
Federal Register
page number
where the document begins.].
5/27/08, [Insert
Federal Register
page number
where the document begins.].
*
33–15–01–05 ..........
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
State citation
*
33–15–04–01 ..........
*
*
Refuse Burning Restrictions ..................
*
5/27/08, [Insert
Federal Register
page number
where the document begins.].
*
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:07 May 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00043
1/1/07
1/1/07
*
1/1/07
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27MYR1.SGM
Explanations
27MYR1
30314
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 27, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA REGULATIONS—Continued
State effective
date
EPA approval date
and citation 2
State citation
Title/subject
33–15–04–02 ..........
Permissible Open Burning .....................
1/1/96
4/21/97, 62 FR
19224.
33–15–04–02.1.b,
33–15–04–02.1.e,
m, 33–15–04–
02.1.g, and 33–
15–04–02.2.k.
Permissible Open Burning .....................
1/1/07
5/27/08, [Insert
Federal Register
page number
where the document begins.].
*
33–15–14–02 ..........
*
*
Permit to Construct ................................
*
*
33–15–14–02.5 and
33–15–14–
02.13.i(5).
33–15–14–02.13.c
and 33–15–14–
02.13.o.
*
*
Review of application—Standard for
granting permits to construct and Exemptions.
Exemptions ............................................
*
*
33–15–17–02 ..........
*
*
Restriction of fugitive particulate emissions.
*
*
*
3/1/94
*
8/8/05, 70 FR
45539.
1/1/07
1/1/07
*
Excluding subsections 1.b, 1.e, 1.g, and
2.k which were subsequently revised
and approved. See below.
*
8/21/95, 60 FR
43396.
3/1/03
Explanations
*
*
Excluding subsections 12, 3.c, 13.b.1,
5, 13.c, 13.i(5), 13.o, and 19 (one
sentence) which were subsequently
revised and approved. See below.
See additional interpretive materials
cited in 57 FR 28619, 6/26/92, regarding the State’s commitment to
meet the requirements of EPA’s
‘‘Guideline on Air Quality Models (Revised).’’
*
*
*
*
*
*
5/27/08, [Insert
Federal Register
page number
where the document begins.].
*
5/27/08, [Insert
Federal Register
page number
where the document begins.].
*
*
2 In
order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the FEDERAL REGISTER notice cited in this column for the particular provision.
(d) EPA-approved source-specific
requirements.
Name of source
—Leland Olds Station
Units 1 & 2.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
—Milton R. Young Unit 1.
—Heskett Station Units 1
& 2.
—Stanton Station Unit 1.
—American Crystal Sugar
at Drayton.
—Tesoro Mandan Refinery.
State effective
date
Nature of requirement
EPA approval date and
citation 3
SIP Chapter 8, Section 8.3, Continuous Emission
Monitoring Requirements for Existing Stationary
Sources, including amendments to Permits to
Operate and Department Order.
5/6/77
10/17/77, 42 FR 55471.
SIP Chapter 8, Section 8.3.1, Continuous Opacity
Monitoring for Fluid Bed Catalytic Cracking Units:
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Co., Mandan Refinery.
2/27/07
Explanations
5/27/08, [Insert Federal
Register page number
where the document
begins.].
3 In order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal Register notice cited in this column for the particular provision.
(e) EPA-approved nonregulatory
provisions.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:07 May 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27MYR1.SGM
27MYR1
30315
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 27, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Name of nonregulatory SIP
provision
Applicable geographic or
non-attainment area
State submittal
date/adopted date
EPA approval date and
citation 4
Explanations
(1) Implementation Plan for
the Control of Air Pollution for the State of North
Dakota.
Statewide ..........................
Submitted: 1/24/72 ............
Adopted: 1/24/72
5/31/72, 37 FR 10842 .......
Excluding subsequent revisions, as follows: Chapters 6, 11, and 12, and
Sections 2.11, 3.2.1,
3.7, 5.2.1, 6.10, 6.11,
6.13, 8.3, and 8.3.1. Revisions to these non-regulatory provisions have
subsequently been approved. See below.
Clarification submitted: 6/
14/73; 2/19/74; 6/26/74;
11/21/74; 4/23/75.
With all clarifications: 3/2/
76, 41 FR 8956.
*
Submitted: 3/8/07 ..............
*
*
5/27/08, [Insert Federal
Register page number
where the document begins.].
Chapters:
1. Introduction.
2. Legal Authority.
3. Control Strategy.
4. Compliance Schedule.
5. Prevention of Air
Pollution Emergency
Episodes.
7. Review of New
Sources and Modifications.
8. Source Surveillance.
9. Resources.
10. Inter-governmental
Cooperation.
11. Rules and Regulations.
With subsequent revisions
to the chapters as follows:
*
(20) Revisions to SIP
Chapter 8, Section 8.3.1.
*
*
...........................................
*
4 In order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal Register notice cited in this column for the particular provisions.
40 CFR part 60 is amended to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
I
PART 60—[AMENDED]
3. The authority citation for part 60
continues to read as follows:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
16:07 May 23, 2008
4. In § 60.4, amend the table in
paragraph (c) by revising the entries for
subparts ‘‘L,’’ ‘‘M,’’ ‘‘N,’’ ‘‘Na,’’ ‘‘P,’’
I
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Subpart A—General Provisions
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
‘‘Q,’’ ‘‘R,’’ ‘‘S,’’ and ‘‘BB’’ to read as
follows:
§ 60.4
*
Addresses.
*
*
(c) * * *
E:\FR\FM\27MYR1.SGM
27MYR1
*
*
30316
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 27, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
DELEGATION STATUS OF NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS [(NSPS) FOR REGION VIII]
Subpart
CO
MT
ND
SD
UT
WY
*
*
*
*
*
L—Secondary Lead Smelters .......................................................................................................
M—Secondary Brass and Bronze Production.
Plants ............................................................................................................................................
N—Primary Emissions from Basic Oxygen Process Furnaces (after 6/11/73) ...........................
Na—Secondary Emissions from Basic Oxygen Process Furnaces (after 1/20/83) .....................
(*)
(*)
*
..........
..........
*
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
*
*
*
*
*
P—Primary Copper Smelters .......................................................................................................
Q—Primary Zinc Smelters ............................................................................................................
R—Primary Lead Smelters ...........................................................................................................
S—Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants ......................................................................................
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
*
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
*
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
*
*
*
*
*
BB—Kraft Pulp Mills .....................................................................................................................
(*)
(*)
*
..........
..........
*
(*)
(*)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(*) Indicates approval of State regulation.
*
*
*
*
*
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[FR Doc. E8–11479 Filed 5–23–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[MB Docket Nos. 00–168, 00–44; FCC 07–
205]
Standardized and Enhanced
Disclosure Requirements for
Television Broadcast Licensee Public
Interest Obligations; Extension of the
Filing Requirement for Children’s
Television Programming Report (FCC
Form 398)
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
The Federal Communications
Commission is correcting a final rule
published in the Federal Register on
March 13, 2008, 73 FR 13452. The
document adopted a standardized form
for the quarterly reporting of
programming aired in response to issues
facing a television station’s community
and a requirement that portions of each
television station’s public inspection
file be placed on the Internet.
DATES: The rules in this document
contain information collection
requirements that have not been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB). After OMB approval
is received, the Commission will
publish a document in the Federal
Register announcing the effective date
of the rules.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:07 May 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
In rule FR
Doc. E8–5052 published on March 13,
2008, 73 FR 13452 make the following
correction.
I 1. On page 13463, in the second
column, under § 73.3527, paragraph
(e)(8)(i) and (ii) are added to read as
follows:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
47 CFR Part 73
SUMMARY:
For
additional information on this
proceeding, contact Holly Saurer,
Holly.Saurer@fcc.gov of the Media
Bureau, Policy Division, (202) 418–
2120.
§ 73.3527
[Corrected]
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(8) * * *
(i) Issues/programs lists. For
nonexempt noncommercial educational
radio broadcast stations, every three
months a list of programs that have
provided the station’s most significant
treatment of community issues during
the preceding three month period. The
list for each calendar quarter is to be
filed by the tenth day of the succeeding
calendar quarter (e.g., January 10 for the
quarter October–December, April 10 for
the quarter January–March, etc.). The
list shall include a brief narrative
describing what issues were given
significant treatment and the
programming that provided this
treatment. The description of the
programs shall include, but shall not be
limited to, the time, date, duration, and
title of each program in which the issue
was treated. The lists described in this
paragraph shall be retained in the public
inspection file until final action has
been taken on the station’s next license
renewal application.
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(ii) TV Standardized Public Interest
Reporting Form. For noncommercial
educational TV and Class A TV
broadcast stations, every three months a
completed Standardized Public Interest
Reporting Form with regard to the
station’s efforts to determine the issues
facing its community and the
programming aired during the preceding
three month period in response to those
issues. The form for each calendar
quarter is to be filed by the thirtieth day
of the succeeding calendar quarter (e.g.,
January 30 for the quarter October–
December, April 30 for the quarter
January–March, etc.). The forms
described in this paragraph shall be
retained in the public inspection file
until final action has been taken on the
station’s next license renewal
application.
*
*
*
*
*
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–11407 Filed 5–23–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
E:\FR\FM\27MYR1.SGM
27MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 102 (Tuesday, May 27, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30308-30316]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-11479]
[[Page 30308]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 60
[EPA-R08-OAR-2007-0617; FRL-8570-2]
Clean Air Act Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality
Implementation Plan Revision for North Dakota; Revisions to the Air
Pollution Control Rules and Alternative Monitoring Plan for Mandan
Refinery; Delegation of Authority for New Source Performance Standards
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule and delegation of authority.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action approving revisions to the
State Implementation Plan (SIP) as submitted by the Governor of North
Dakota with a letter dated March 8, 2007. The revisions affect certain
air pollution control rules regarding general provisions, open burning
restrictions, permitting, and fugitive emissions. In addition, we are
approving a revision to a chapter of the SIP regarding an alternative
monitoring plan for the Tesoro Mandan Refinery. This action is being
taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act. EPA is also providing
notice that on August 22, 2007, North Dakota was delegated authority to
implement and enforce certain New Source Performance Standards as in
effect on January 31, 2006.
DATES: This action is effective on July 28, 2008 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by June 26, 2008. If
adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that
the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R08-
OAR-2007-0617, by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: Platt.Amy@epa.gov.
Fax: (303) 312-6064 (please alert the individual listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section if you are faxing
comments).
Mail: Callie Videtich, Director, Air Program,
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P-AR, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129.
Hand Delivery: Director, Air Program, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P-AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street,
Denver, Colorado 80202-1129. Such deliveries are only accepted Monday
through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R08-OAR-
2007-0617. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA, without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/
epahome/dockets.htm. For additional instructions on submitting
comments, go to section I. General Information of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Program,
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street,
Denver, Colorado 80202-1129. EPA requests that if at all possible, you
contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to view the hard copy of the docket. You may view the hard copy
of the docket Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Platt, EPA Region 8, at (303) 312-
6449, or Platt.Amy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. General Information
II. Background
III. Revisions in the March 8, 2007 Submittal That Are the Subject
of This Document
IV. Delegation of Authority
V. Section 110(l)
VI. Final Action
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Review
Definitions
For the purpose of this document, we are giving meaning to certain
words or initials as follows:
(i) The words or initials Act or CAA mean or refer to the Clean Air
Act, unless the context indicates otherwise.
(ii) The words EPA, we, us or our mean or refer to the United
States Environmental Protection Agency.
(iii) The initials SIP mean or refer to State Implementation Plan.
(iv) The words State or ND mean the State of North Dakota, unless
the context indicates otherwise.
(v) The initials NDDH mean or refer to the North Dakota Department
of Health.
I. General Information
A. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
https://regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
[[Page 30309]]
2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
a. Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
b. Follow directions--The agency may ask you to respond to specific
questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
c. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
d. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
e. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
f. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
g. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
h. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline
identified.
II. Background
The Act requires States to follow certain procedures in developing
implementation plans and plan revisions for submission to us. Sections
110(a)(2) and 110(l) of the Act provide that each implementation plan
must be adopted after reasonable notice and public hearing.
To provide for public comment, the North Dakota Department of
Health (NDDH), after providing notice, held a public hearing on May 4,
2006 to consider the revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
and Air Pollution Control Rules. Following the public hearing, comment
period, and legal review by the North Dakota Attorney General's Office,
NDDH adopted the revisions. The revisions to the Air Pollution Control
Rules became effective on January 1, 2007 and the revision to the SIP
chapter regarding an alternative monitoring plan for the Tesoro Mandan
Refinery became effective on February 27, 2007. The North Dakota
Governor submitted the SIP revisions to us with a letter dated March 8,
2007.
III. Revisions in the March 8, 2007 Submittal That Are the Subject of
This Document
The revisions in the March 8, 2007 submittal to be addressed in
this document pertain to certain portions of the North Dakota Air
Pollution Control Rules regarding general provisions, open burning,
permitting, and fugitive emissions. These revisions involve the
following chapters of the North Dakota Administrative Code (N.D.A.C.):
33-14-01 General Provisions; 33-15-04 Open Burning Restrictions; 33-15-
14 Designated Air Contaminant Sources, Permit to Construct, Minor
Source Permit to Operate, Title V Permit to Operate (certain sections
specific to permit to construct); and 33-15-17 Restriction of Fugitive
Emissions. In addition, the March 8, 2007 submittal included a revision
to SIP Chapter 8, Source Surveillance, to provide an alternative
monitoring plan for the Tesoro Mandan Refinery.
A. Chapter 33-15-01, N.D.A.C., General Provisions
Sections 33-15-01-04 and 33-15-01-05 were revised. In section 33-
15-01-04, the baseline date for the incorporation by reference of the
Federal definition of ``volatile organic compounds,'' located at 40 CFR
51.100(s), was updated to January 1, 2006. In section 33-15-01-05, a
slight editorial change was made to the meaning of the abbreviation for
PM10. These revisions were made to match Federal
requirements and are approvable.
B. Chapter 33-15-04, N.D.A.C., Open Burning Restrictions
Sections 33-15-04-01 and 33-15-04-02 were revised. Section 33-15-
04-01, Refuse Burning Restrictions, was revised to clarify that the
burning of trade waste is not allowed. As defined in the General
Provisions chapter (33-15-01-04, N.D.A.C.), trade waste means solid,
liquid, or gaseous waste material resulting from construction or the
conduct of any business, trade, or industry, or any demolition
operation, including wood, wood containing preservatives, plastics,
cartons, grease, oil, chemicals, and cinders.
In section 33-15-04-02, Permissible Open Burning, a reference to
the North Dakota Rural Fire Contingency Plan was removed since this
document no longer exists. In addition, changes were made to limit
approval of open burning to abate a fire hazard to the NDDH or its
designee, as well as to require State and Federal agencies that conduct
prescribed burning to submit an annual report upon request by NDDH.
Finally, a notification requirement was replaced by a requirement that
prohibits open burning when a burning ban is declared by State or local
officials.
These changes clarified existing rules, eliminated out-of-date
references, and added reporting requirements for State and Federal
prescribed burning. These revisions are approvable.
C. Chapter 33-15-14, N.D.A.C., Designated Air Contaminant Sources,
Permit To Construct, Minor Source Permit To Operate, Title V Permit To
Operate (Certain Sections Specific To Permit To Construct)
In the Permit to Construct section, 33-15-14-02, subdivision 33-15-
14-02.13.c was revised. These revisions relate to certain sources that
will now be exempt from requirements for a permit to construct.
Specifically, an exemption was added for any internal combustion
engine, or multiple engines at the same facility, with a total combined
actual emission rate of 5 tons per year or less of any air contaminant
for which an ambient air quality standard has been promulgated in
section 33-15-02-04. Given that this revision reduces the stringency of
the rule, EPA requested a demonstration that the revision will not
interfere with attainment and maintenance of the National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS), Prevention of Significant Deterioration of
Air Quality Increments (PSD Increments), or any other requirement of
the Clean Air Act.
In a July 7, 2006 letter from Terry O'Clair, NDDH, to Richard Long,
EPA, NDDH provided results from a SCREEN3 \1\ modeling run which shows
that a typical internal combustion engine emitting 5 tons a year of
nitrogen dioxide (NO2) will not violate the NAAQS or PSD increments.
Based on AP-42 emission factors for this type of engine, NO2 has the
larger emission rate and would be the pollutant of concern, while CO
and PM emission rates are much lower for such engines and would not be
expected to threaten the NAAQS or PSD increments. As a result, EPA is
satisfied that this revision will not adversely impact the NAAQS or PSD
increments. Therefore, this revision is approvable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ SCREEN3 is a single source Gaussian plume screening model
which provides, among other things, maximum ground-level
concentrations for point, area, flare, and volume sources.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, subdivision 33-15-14-02.13.o was revised to remove a
reference to subdivision n of subsection 1 of section 33-15-14-06.
Section 33-15-14-06, subsection 1, contains the State's definitions for
the Title V operating permits program. The previous reference to
subdivision n was to the definition of ``major source,'' and the
purpose of the reference was to define oil and gas production
facilities that either were or were not major sources. Now the
definition of ``major
[[Page 30310]]
source'' is found at subdivision o. Rather than include a reference to
a new subdivision letter that might change again, the State changed the
reference to be at the more general subsection level. This was purely a
housekeeping change and is approvable.
D. Chapter 33-15-17, N.D.A.C., Restriction of Fugitive Emissions
A provision was added to section 33-15-17-02 to restrict fugitive
particulate emissions that would have an adverse impact on visibility
on any Class I Federal area. The NDDH made this revision to help
prevent degradation of visibility in Theodore Roosevelt National Park
and Lostwood Wilderness Area due to fugitive emissions. This revision
is approvable.
E. SIP Chapter 8, ``Source Surveillance,'' Section 8.3.1, ``Continuous
Opacity Monitoring for Fluid Bed Catalytic Cracking Units: Tesoro
Refining and Marketing Co., Mandan Refinery''
The Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company (Tesoro) currently
operates a fluidized bed catalytic cracking unit (FCCU) at the Mandan
Refinery. The refinery was constructed in the 1950s and is required to
continuously monitor the opacity of emissions from the FCCU according
to 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix P, and North Dakota SIP Chapter 8, Source
Surveillance. In May 1977, the NDDH issued an order requiring the
installation and operation of continuous opacity monitoring (COM)
equipment for emissions from the FCCU, and the opacity has been
continuously monitored since the compliance date of September 30, 1978.
In 2001, Tesoro entered into a Consent Decree with EPA to settle
allegations of noncompliance under the Prevention of Significant
Deterioration Program. As part of this settlement, Tesoro was required
to control SO2 emissions from the FCCU. Tesoro installed a
wet scrubber and wet electrostatic precipitator (ESP) to comply with
the terms of the Consent Decree. The large amount of moisture from the
control system has made monitoring of the opacity of emissions using
COM equipment infeasible. Specifically, water droplets contained in the
flue gas could potentially result in the monitor overstating the true
opacity. Therefore, Tesoro requested alternative monitoring procedures
and requirements in accordance with 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix P, Section
6.0. The NDDH and EPA agreed with Tesoro that such alternative
monitoring procedures and requirements were warranted given that the
excess moisture in the stack from the wet scrubber interferes with the
COM and makes the COM data inaccurate.
As a result, NDDH revised SIP Chapter 8, ``Source Surveillance,''
Section 8.3, ``Continuous Emission Monitoring Requirements for Existing
Stationary Sources, including amendments to Permits to Operate and
Department Order.'' The revision provided for a new Section 8.3.1,
``Continuous Opacity Monitoring for Fluid Bed Catalytic Cracking Units:
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Co., Mandan Refinery.'' This new section
provides alternative monitoring procedures and requirements for the
Tesoro Mandan refinery. Tesoro has demonstrated through Method 9
measurements that the FCCU will easily comply with the visible
emissions limit of 40% opacity when the scrubber flow rate is at least
2511 gallons per minute (gpm). Therefore, the alternative monitoring
plan requires that liquid flow through the wet scrubber at 2511 gpm, or
more, on an hourly average basis. If the flow rate is less than 2511
gpm, Tesoro must conduct a Method 9 test each day until the required
flow rate is achieved.
In addition, Section 8.3.1 contains, among other things, the
following requirements:
1. Tesoro must monitor the liquid flow rate through the wet gas
scrubber on a continuous basis.
2. Tesoro must keep records of the liquid flow rate on a continuous
basis, and keep such records for at least five years.
3. Tesoro must submit semi-annual deviations reports for the FCCU,
listing any time period monitoring is not conducted as outlined in
Section 8.3.1 and any time monitoring indicates the required flow rate
is not attained. Tesoro must also submit an annual certification
indicating compliance with the visible emissions limit.
EPA interprets these provisions such that a failure to maintain a
liquid flow rate through the wet scrubber of at least 2511 gpm, one-
hour average, is a violation of the SIP.
This alternative monitoring plan was finalized between Tesoro and
NDDH on February 27, 2007, and approved by the director of EPA Region
8's Technical Enforcement Program in an August 24, 2007 letter from
Cynthia Reynolds (on behalf of Martin Hestmark) to Ron W. Day, Tesoro
Refining and Marketing Company. EPA is satisfied that this alternative
monitoring plan will ensure Tesoro complies with the requirements of 40
CFR 51.214 and 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix P, to continuously monitor
opacity emissions and will be adequate to ensure Tesoro complies with
the SIP opacity limits that apply to the FCCU at the Mandan Refinery.
Accordingly, this approval ratifies the Region 8 Technical Enforcement
Program's approval of the alternative monitoring procedures and
requirements reflected in new Section 8.3.1 of the North Dakota SIP.
IV. Section 110(l)
Section 110(l) of the Clean Air Act states that a SIP revision
cannot be approved if the revision would interfere with any applicable
requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress
towards attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) or any other applicable requirements of the Act. There are no
nonattainment areas in North Dakota. The revisions to the general
provisions, open burning restrictions, and fugitive emissions
provisions are consistent with Federal requirements, clarifying in
nature, and will not interfere with requirements of the Act related to
administrative or procedural provisions. Although the revision to the
permitting provisions reduces the stringency of the rule, the State has
adequately demonstrated through modeling that it will not adversely
impact the NAAQS or PSD Increments. The revisions to SIP Chapter 8,
regarding the alternative monitoring plan for Tesoro's Mandan refinery,
adequately detail monitoring parameters, frequency of monitoring, wet
gas scrubber flow rate requirements, recordkeeping, and reporting
requirements to ensure that the refinery can comply with requirements
to continuously monitor opacity emissions and will be adequate to
ensure Tesoro complies with the SIP opacity limits that apply to the
FCCU at the Mandan Refinery. Therefore, these revisions do not
interfere with attainment or maintenance of the NAAQS or other
applicable requirements of the Act.
V. Delegation of Authority
With a July 17, 2007 letter, the Governor of North Dakota requested
delegation of authority for revisions to the New Source Performance
Standards (NSPS), promulgated in Chapter 33-15-12, N.D.A.C. On August
22, 2007, delegation was given with the following letter:
Ref: 8P-AR
Terry O'Clair, Director, Division of Air Quality, Environmental
Health Section, North Dakota Department of Health, 918 E. Divide
Avenue, Bismarck, ND 58501-1947
Re: Delegation of Clean Air Act New Source Performance Standards
[[Page 30311]]
Dear Mr. O'Clair: With Governor Hoeven's July 17, 2007 letter
and your July 18, 2007 letter, the State of North Dakota submitted
revisions to its Air Pollution Control Rules and requested, among
other things, direct delegation to implement and enforce the Federal
New Source Performance Standards (NSPS). Specifically, North Dakota
Administrative Code Chapter 33-15-12, Standards of Performance of
New Stationary Sources, was revised to update the citation for the
incorporated Federal NSPS in 40 CFR Part 60 as those in effect on
January 31, 2006, with the exception of subparts Eb, L, M, N, Na, P,
Q, R, S, and BB, which have not been adopted by the State.
Subsequent to States adopting NSPS regulations, EPA delegates
the authority for the implementation and enforcement of those NSPS,
so long as the States' regulations are equivalent to the Federal
regulations. EPA reviewed the pertinent statutes and regulations of
the State of North Dakota and determined that they provide an
adequate and effective procedure for the implementation and
enforcement of the NSPS by the State. Therefore, pursuant to Section
111(c) of the Clean Air Act (Act), as amended, and 40 CFR Part 60,
EPA hereby delegates its authority for the implementation and
enforcement of the NSPS to the State of North Dakota as follows:
(A) Responsibility for all sources located, or to be located, in
the State of North Dakota subject to the standards of performance
for new stationary sources promulgated in 40 CFR Part 60. The
categories of new stationary sources covered by this delegation are
all NSPS subparts in 40 CFR Part 60, as in effect on January 31,
2006, with the exception of subparts Eb, L, M, N, Na, P, Q, R, S,
and BB, which have not been adopted by the State. Note this
delegation does not include the emission guidelines in subparts Cb,
Cc, Cd, Ce, BBBB, DDDD, and HHHH. These subparts require state
plans, which are approved under a separate process pursuant to
Section 111(d) of the Act.
(B) Not all authorities of NSPS can be delegated to States under
Section 111(c) of the Act, as amended. The EPA Administrator retains
authority to implement those sections of the NSPS that require: (1)
Approving equivalency determinations and alternative test methods,
(2) decision-making to ensure national consistency, and (3) EPA
rulemaking in order to implement. Enclosed with this letter is a
list of examples of sections in 40 CFR Part 60 related to the NSPS
being delegated in this letter that cannot be delegated to the State
of North Dakota. Please note that the enclosed list has been updated
since our July 27, 2005 delegation of authority to implement and
enforce the NSPS to the State of North Dakota.
(C) The North Dakota Department of Health (NDDH) and EPA will
continue a system of communication sufficient to guarantee that each
office is always kept informed and current regarding compliance
status of the subject sources and interpretation of the regulations.
(D) Enforcement of the NSPS in the State will be the primary
responsibility of the NDDH. If the NDDH determines that such
enforcement is not feasible and so notifies EPA, or where the NDDH
acts in a manner inconsistent with the terms of this delegation, EPA
may exercise its concurrent enforcement authority pursuant to
section 113 of the Act, as amended, with respect to sources within
the State of North Dakota subject to NSPS.
(E) The State of North Dakota will at no time grant a variance
or waiver from compliance with NSPS regulations. Should NDDH grant
such a variance or waiver, EPA will consider the source receiving
such relief to be in violation of the applicable Federal regulation
and initiate enforcement action against the source pursuant to
section 113 of the Act. The granting of such relief by the NDDH
shall also constitute grounds for revocation of the delegation by
EPA.
(F) If at any time there is a conflict between a State
regulation and a Federal regulation (40 CFR Part 60), the Federal
regulation must be applied if it is more stringent than that of the
State. If the State does not have the authority to enforce the more
stringent Federal regulation, this portion of the delegation may be
revoked.
(G) If the Regional Administrator determines that a State
procedure for enforcing or implementing the NSPS is inadequate, or
is not being effectively carried out, this delegation may be revoked
in whole or part. Any such revocation shall be effective as of the
date specified in a Notice of Revocation to the NDDH.
(H) Acceptance of this delegation of presently promulgated NSPS
does not commit the State of North Dakota to accept delegation of
future standards and requirements. A new request for delegation will
be required for any standards not included in the State's July 17,
2007 letter.
(I) Upon approval of the Regional Administrator of EPA Region 8,
the Director of NDDH may sub-delegate his authority to implement and
enforce the NSPS to local air pollution control authorities in the
State when such authorities have demonstrated that they have
equivalent or more stringent programs in force.
(J) The State of North Dakota must require reporting of all
excess emissions from any NSPS source in accordance with 40 CFR Part
60.7(c).
(K) Performance tests shall be scheduled and conducted in
accordance with the procedures set forth in 40 CFR Part 60 unless
alternate methods or procedures are approved by the EPA
Administrator. Although the Administrator retains the exclusive
right to approve equivalent and alternate test methods as specified
in 40 CFR Part 60.8(b)(2) and (3), the State may approve minor
changes in methodology provided these changes are reported to EPA
Region 8. The Administrator also retains the right to change the
opacity standard as specified in 40 CFR Part 60.11(e).
(L) Determinations of applicability, such as those specified in
40 CFR Part 60.5 and review of plans, as provided for in 40 CFR Part
60.6, shall be consistent with those determinations already made and
reviews conducted by the EPA.
(M) Alternatives to continuous monitoring procedures or
reporting requirements, as outlined in 40 CFR Part 60.13(i), may be
approved by the State only if the specific NSPS grants that
authority. Otherwise, EPA retains the authority to review and
approve such alternatives.
(N) If a source proposes to modify its operation or facility
which may cause the source to be subject to NSPS requirements, the
State shall notify EPA Region 8 and obtain a determination on the
applicability of the NSPS regulations.
(O) Information shall be made available to the public in
accordance with 40 CFR Part 60.9. Any records, reports, or
information provided to, or otherwise obtained by, the State in
accordance with the provisions of these regulations shall be made
available to the designated representatives of EPA upon request.
(P) All reports required pursuant to the delegated NSPS should
not be submitted to the EPA Region 8 office, but rather to the NDDH.
(Q) As 40 CFR Part 60 is updated, North Dakota should revise its
regulations accordingly and in a timely manner and submit to EPA
requests for updates to its delegation of authority.
EPA is approving North Dakota's request for NSPS delegation for
all areas within the State except for the following: Lands within
the exterior boundaries of the Fort Berthold, Fort Totten, Standing
Rock and Turtle Mountain Indian Reservations; and any other areas
which are ``Indian Country'' within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. 1151.
Since this delegation is effective immediately, there is no need
for the State to notify the EPA of its acceptance. Unless we receive
written notice of objections from you within ten days of the date on
which you receive this letter, the State of North Dakota will be
deemed to accept all the terms of this delegation. To inform the
public of this delegation, EPA will publish an information notice in
the Federal Register in which this letter will appear in its
entirety.
If you have any questions on this matter, please contact me at
(303) 312-6241 or Callie Videtich, Director of our Air and Radiation
Program, at (303) 312-6434, or toll-free at 1-800-227-8917.
Sincerely,
Stephen S. Tuber
Assistant Regional Administrator
Office of Partnerships and
Regulatory Assistance
Enclosure
cc: Tom Bachman, NDDH
Enclosure to Letter Delegating NSPS in 40 CFR Part 60, Effective
Through January 31, 2006, to the State of North Dakota
[[Page 30312]]
Examples of Authorities in 40 CFR Part 60 Which Cannot Be Delegated
------------------------------------------------------------------------
40 CFR subparts Section(s)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A............................ 60.8(b)(2) and (b)(3), and those sections
throughout the standards that reference
60.8(b)(2) and (b)(3); 60.11(b) and (e);
and 60.13(i).
Da........................... 60.47Da.
Db........................... 60.44b(f), 60.44b(g) and 60.49b(a)(4).
Dc........................... 60.48c(a)(4).
Ec........................... 60.56c(i), 60.8.
J............................ 60.105(a)(13)(iii) and 60.106(i)(12).
Ka........................... 60.114a.
Kb........................... 60.111b(f)(4), 60.114b,
60.116b(e)(3)(iii), 60.116b(e)(3)(iv),
and 60.116b(f)(2)(iii).
O............................ 60.153(e).
DD........................... 60.302(d)(3).
GG........................... 60.332(a)(4) and 60.335(b)(10)(ii).
VV........................... 60.482-1(c)(2) and 60.484.
WW........................... 60.493(b)(2)(i)(A) and 60.496(a)(1).
XX........................... 60.502(e)(6).
AAA.......................... 60.531, 60.533, 60.534, 60.535,
60.536(i)(2), 60.537, 60.538(e), and
60.539.
BBB.......................... 60.543(c)(2)(ii)(B).
DDD.......................... 60.562-2(c).
GGG.......................... 60.592(c).
III.......................... 60.613(e).
JJJ.......................... 60.623.
KKK.......................... 60.634.
NNN.......................... 60.663(f).
QQQ.......................... 60.694.
RRR.......................... 60.703(e).
SSS.......................... 60.711(a)(16), 60.713(b)(1)(i) and (ii),
60.713(b)(5)(i), 60.713(d), 60.715(a)
and 60.716.
TTT.......................... 60.723(b)(1), 60.723(b)(2)(i)(C),
60.723(b)(2)(iv), 60.724(e) and
60.725(b).
VVV.......................... 60.743(a)(3)(v)(A) and (B), 60.743(e),
60.745(a) and 60.746.
WWW.......................... 60.754(a)(5).
CCCC......................... 60.2030(c)(1) through (7).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
VI. Final Action
EPA is approving revisions to the North Dakota SIP that involve
certain portions of the North Dakota Air Pollution Control Rules
regarding general provisions, open burning, permitting, and fugitive
emissions, as submitted by the Governor of North Dakota with a letter
dated March 8, 2007. Specifically, EPA approves revisions to the
following portions of the North Dakota Administrative Code (N.D.A.C.):
Chapter 33-15-01, General Provisions, sections 33-15-01-04 and 33-15-
01-05; Chapter 33-15-04, Open Burning Restrictions, sections 33-15-04-
01 and 33-15-04-02; Chapter 33-15-14, Designated Air Contaminant
Sources, Permit to Construct, Minor Source Permit to Operate, Title V
Permit to Operate, subsections 33-15-14-02.13.c. and 33-15-14-02.13.o.
(certain sections specific to permit to construct); and Chapter 33-15-
17, Restriction of Fugitive Emissions, subsection 33-15-17-02. In
addition, EPA approves revisions to North Dakota SIP Chapter 8,
``Source Surveillance,'' also submitted by the Governor of North Dakota
with his March 8, 2007 letter. Specifically EPA approves Section 8.3.1,
``Continuous Opacity Monitoring for Fluid Bed Catalytic Cracking Units:
Tesoro Refining and Marketing Co., Mandan Refinery.'' EPA is publishing
this rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no adverse comment. However,
in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's Federal Register, EPA is
publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to
approve the SIP revision if adverse comments are filed. This rule will
be effective on July 28, 2008 without further notice unless EPA
receives adverse comment by June 26, 2008. If EPA receives adverse
comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will not take effect. EPA will
address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this
action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Review
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
[[Page 30313]]
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also
does not have Federalism implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This
action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal standard,
and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is
not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997), because it approves a state rule implementing a Federal
standard.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 28, 2008. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: May 7, 2008.
Carol Rushin,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8.
0
40 CFR part 52 is amended to read as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart JJ--North Dakota
0
2. Section 52.1820 is amended to read as follows:
0
a. In the table in paragraph (c) by:
0
i. Revising the entries for ``33-15-01-04;'' ``33-15-01-5;'' ``33-15-
04-01;'' ``33-15-04-02;'' ``33-15-14-02;'' and ``33-15-17-02.''
0
ii. Adding entries in numerical order for ``33-15-04-02.1.b, 33-15-04-
02.1.e, 33-15-04-02.1.g, and 33-15-04-02.2.k;'' and ``33-15-14-02.13.c
and 33-15-14-02.13.o.''
0
iii. Removing the entry for ``33-15-14-02.5, 33-15-14-02.13.c, and 33-
15-14-02.13.i(5)'' and adding in its place a new entry for ``33-15-14-
02.5 and 33-15-14-02.13.i(5).''
0
b. In paragraph (d) by revising the table.
0
c. In the table in paragraph (e) by revising the entry ``(1)'' and by
adding entry ``(20)'' in numerical order.
Sec. 52.1820 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) EPA approved regulations.
State of North Dakota Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State EPA approval date
State citation Title/subject effective date and citation \2\ Explanations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
33-15-01-04................... Definitions........... 1/1/07 5/27/08, [Insert .....................
Federal Register
page number
where the
document
begins.].
33-15-01-05................... Abbreviations......... 1/1/07 5/27/08, [Insert .....................
Federal Register
page number
where the
document
begins.].
* * * * * * *
33-15-04-01................... Refuse Burning 1/1/07 5/27/08, [Insert .....................
Restrictions. Federal Register
page number
where the
document
begins.].
[[Page 30314]]
33-15-04-02................... Permissible Open 1/1/96 4/21/97, 62 FR Excluding subsections
Burning. 19224. 1.b, 1.e, 1.g, and
2.k which were
subsequently revised
and approved. See
below.
33-15-04-02.1.b, 33-15-04- Permissible Open 1/1/07 5/27/08, [Insert .....................
02.1.e, m, 33-15-04-02.1.g, Burning. Federal Register
and 33-15-04-02.2.k. page number
where the
document
begins.].
* * * * * * *
33-15-14-02................... Permit to Construct... 3/1/94 8/21/95, 60 FR Excluding subsections
43396. 12, 3.c, 13.b.1, 5,
13.c, 13.i(5), 13.o,
and 19 (one
sentence) which were
subsequently revised
and approved. See
below.
See additional
interpretive
materials cited in
57 FR 28619, 6/26/
92, regarding the
State's commitment
to meet the
requirements of
EPA's ``Guideline on
Air Quality Models
(Revised).''
* * * * * * *
33-15-14-02.5 and 33-15-14- Review of application-- 3/1/03 8/8/05, 70 FR
02.13.i(5). Standard for granting 45539.
permits to construct
and Exemptions.
33-15-14-02.13.c and 33-15-14- Exemptions............ 1/1/07 5/27/08, [Insert .....................
02.13.o. Federal Register
page number
where the
document
begins.].
* * * * * * *
33-15-17-02................... Restriction of 1/1/07 5/27/08, [Insert
fugitive particulate Federal Register
emissions. page number
where the
document
begins.].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ In order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the
Federal Register notice cited in this column for the particular provision.
(d) EPA-approved source-specific requirements.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State EPA approval date
Name of source Nature of requirement effective date and citation \3\ Explanations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--Leland Olds Station Units 1 SIP Chapter 8, Section 5/6/77 10/17/77, 42 FR
& 2. 8.3, Continuous 55471.
Emission Monitoring
Requirements for
Existing Stationary
Sources, including
amendments to Permits
to Operate and
Department Order.
--Milton R. Young Unit 1......
--Heskett Station Units 1 & 2.
--Stanton Station Unit 1......
--American Crystal Sugar at
Drayton.
--Tesoro Mandan Refinery...... SIP Chapter 8, Section 2/27/07 5/27/08, [Insert
8.3.1, Continuous Federal Register
Opacity Monitoring page number
for Fluid Bed where the
Catalytic Cracking document
Units: Tesoro begins.] .
Refining and
Marketing Co., Mandan
Refinery.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ In order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the
Federal Register notice cited in this column for the particular provision.
(e) EPA-approved nonregulatory provisions.
[[Page 30315]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable
Name of nonregulatory SIP geographic or non- State submittal EPA approval date Explanations
provision attainment area date/adopted date and citation \4\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Implementation Plan for the Statewide......... Submitted: 1/24/72 5/31/72, 37 FR Excluding
Control of Air Pollution for Adopted: 1/24/72.. 10842. subsequent
the State of North Dakota. revisions, as
follows: Chapters
6, 11, and 12,
and Sections
2.11, 3.2.1, 3.7,
5.2.1, 6.10,
6.11, 6.13, 8.3,
and 8.3.1.
Revisions to
these non-
regulatory
provisions have
subsequently been
approved. See
below.
Clarification With all
submitted: 6/14/ clarifications: 3/
73; 2/19/74; 6/26/ 2/76, 41 FR 8956.
74; 11/21/74; 4/
23/75.
Chapters:
1. Introduction.............
2. Legal Authority..........
3. Control Strategy.........
4. Compliance Schedule......
5. Prevention of Air
Pollution Emergency
Episodes.
7. Review of New Sources and
Modifications.
8. Source Surveillance......
9. Resources................
10. Inter-governmental
Cooperation.
11. Rules and Regulations...
With subsequent revisions to the
chapters as follows:
* * * * * * *
(20) Revisions to SIP Chapter 8, .................. Submitted: 3/8/07. 5/27/08, [Insert
Section 8.3.1. Federal Register
page number where
the document
begins.].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ In order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the
Federal Register notice cited in this column for the particular provisions.
0
40 CFR part 60 is amended to read as follows:
PART 60--[AMENDED]
0
3. The authority citation for part 60 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart A--General Provisions
0
4. In Sec. 60.4, amend the table in paragraph (c) by revising the
entries for subparts ``L,'' ``M,'' ``N,'' ``Na,'' ``P,'' ``Q,'' ``R,''
``S,'' and ``BB'' to read as follows:
Sec. 60.4 Addresses.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
[[Page 30316]]
Delegation Status of New Source Performance Standards [(NSPS) for Region VIII]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subpart CO MT ND SD UT WY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
L--Secondary Lead Smelters...................................... (*) (*) ...... ...... (*) (*)
M--Secondary Brass and Bronze Production........................
Plants.......................................................... (*) (*) ...... ...... (*) (*)
N--Primary Emissions from Basic Oxygen Process Furnaces (after 6/ (*) (*) ...... ...... (*) (*)
11/73).........................................................
Na--Secondary Emissions from Basic Oxygen Process Furnaces (*) (*) ...... ...... (*) (*)
(after 1/20/83)................................................
* * * * * * *
P--Primary Copper Smelters...................................... (*) (*) ...... ...... (*) (*)
Q--Primary Zinc Smelters........................................ (*) (*) ...... ...... (*) (*)
R--Primary Lead Smelters........................................ (*) (*) ...... ...... (*) (*)
S--Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants............................ (*) (*) ...... ...... (*) (*)
* * * * * * *
BB--Kraft Pulp Mills............................................ (*) (*) ...... ...... (*) (*)
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(*) Indicates approval of State regulation.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-11479 Filed 5-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P