Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation; State Long-Term Care Partnership Program: Reporting Requirements for Insurers, 30030-30038 [E8-11559]
Download as PDF
30030
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 101 / Friday, May 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
all documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed directly
below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doris Lo, EPA Region IX, (415) 972–
3959, lo.doris@epa.gov.
On April
21, 2008 the Regional Administrator
signed a proposed rule entitled
‘‘Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Designation of
Areas for Air Quality Planning
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purposes; State of California; PM–10;
Revision of Designation; Redesignation
of the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin PM–
10 Nonattainment Area to Attainment;
Approval of PM–10 Maintenance Plan
for the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin;
Approval of Commitments for the East
Kern PM–10 Nonattainment Area.’’ This
rule was published on April 25, 2008
(73 FR 22307) and, among other things,
proposed to approve county by county
subarea motor vehicle emissions
budgets (MVEB) in the 2007 San Joaquin
Valley PM–10 Maintenance Plan (2007
Plan) for the San Joaquin Valley Air
Basin (SJVAB) PM–10 nonattainment
area 1 for the years 2005 and 2020. See
73 FR 22307, 22315–22317, Table 4. The
California Air Resources Board (CARB)
used its mobile source emission model,
EMFAC2007, to estimate the direct
particulate matter of ten microns or less
(PM–10) emissions and oxides of
nitrogen (NOX) emissions for the
MVEBs.
CARB has provided EPA with
technical corrections to the 2020 MVEBs
for Merced, San Joaquin, Stanislaus and
Tulare counties in the 2007 Plan. See
the May 13, 2008 letter to Mr. Wayne
Nastri from James N. Goldstene. As
discussed in the letter, the MVEBs for
these four counties were incorrectly
calculated because the input processor
for the EMFAC2007 emissions model
used the wrong travel activity data for
2020. The correct MVEBs are shown in
revised Table 4 below, which replaces
Table 4 in the proposed rule at 73 FR
22316–22317:
TABLE 4.—MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS SUBAREA BUDGETS (TONS PER DAY) SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN 2007
PLAN *
2005
2020
County
PM–10
NOX
PM–10
NOX
Fresno ..............................................................................................................
Kern ** ..............................................................................................................
Kings ................................................................................................................
Madera .............................................................................................................
Merced .............................................................................................................
San Joaquin .....................................................................................................
Stanislaus ........................................................................................................
Tulare ...............................................................................................................
13.5
12.1
3.1
3.6
6.2
9.1
5.6
7.3
59.2
88.3
16.7
13.9
39.2
42.6
29.7
25.1
16.1
14.7
3.6
4.7
6.4
10.6
6.7
9.4
23.2
39.5
6.8
6.5
12.9
17.0
10.8
10.9
Total ..........................................................................................................
60.5
314.7
72.2
127.6
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
* The budgets are based on attainment and maintenance of the 24-hour PM–10 NAAQS. The annual standard was revoked on December 18,
2006. See 71 FR 61144.
** MVEBs in Table 4 are only for the SJVAB portion of Kern County.
The difference between the 2020
budgets found in the 2007 Plan and the
2020 budgets provided in the May 13,
2008 letter are small and Valley-wide
result in no change in total PM–10
emissions and an increase of only 0.2
tons per day in NOX emissions. EPA
believes that the changes in the budgets
do not impact the maintenance
demonstration in the 2007 Plan because
they are small. Therefore these technical
corrections have no effect on EPA’s
preliminary conclusion that the subarea
2020 MVEBs for Merced, San Joaquin,
Stanislaus and Tulare counties are
approvable (73 FR 22316–22317) or on
any other aspects of the proposed rule.
EPA is extending the public comment
period for the proposed rule until June
10, 2008 in order to provide the public
with the opportunity to consider these
technical corrections.
Dated: May 15, 2008.
Wayne Nastri,
Regional Administrator, Region 9.
[FR Doc. E8–11605 Filed 5–22–08; 8:45 am]
1 The nonattainment area includes the entire
counties of San Joaquin, Fresno, Kings, Madera,
Merced, Stanislaus and Tulare and part of Kern
County.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 May 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Office of the Secretary
45 CFR Part 144
[ASPELTCI]
RIN 0991–AB44
Office of the Assistant Secretary for
Planning and Evaluation; State LongTerm Care Partnership Program:
Reporting Requirements for Insurers
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Planning and Evaluation
(OASPE), HHS.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: This proposed rule sets forth
proposed reporting requirements for
private insurers that issue qualified
long-term care insurance policies in
States participating in the State LongTerm Care Partnership Program
established under the Deficit Reduction
Act (DRA) of 2005. Section 6021 of the
Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 requires
that the Secretary specify a set of
reporting requirements and collect data
from insurers on qualifying long-term
care insurance policies issued under the
program and the subsequent use of the
benefits under these policies. Under a
State Long-Term Care Partnership
Program, an amount equal to the
benefits received under of the long-term
care insurance policy is disregarded in
determining the assets of an individual
for purposes of Medicaid eligibility and
estate recovery.
E:\FR\FM\23MYP1.SGM
23MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 101 / Friday, May 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
To be assured consideration,
comments must be received at the
address provided below, no later than 5
p.m. on July 22, 2008.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer
to file code ASPE:LTCI. Because of staff
and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission.
You may submit comments in one of
four ways (no duplicates, please):
1. Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on specific issues
in this regulation to https://
www.Regulations.gov. Click on the link
‘‘Comment or Submission’’ and enter
the keyword ‘‘ASPE:LTCI’’.
(Attachments should be in Microsoft
Word, WordPerfect, or Excel; however,
we prefer Microsoft Word.)
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments (one original and two
copies) to the following address only:
Office of Disability, Aging, and LongTerm Care, Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Planning and Evaluation,
Department of Health and Human
Services, Attention: ASPE:LTCI, Hunter
McKay, 200 Independence Avenue,
SW., Room 424–E, Washington, DC
20201.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments (one
original and two copies) to the following
address only: Office of Disability, Aging,
and Long-Term Care, Office of the
Assistant Secretary for Planning and
Evaluation, Department of Health and
Human Services, Attention: ASPE:LTCI,
Hunter McKay, 200 Independence
Avenue, SW., Room 424–E, Washington,
DC 20201.
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer,
you may deliver (by hand or courier)
your written comments (one original
and two copies) before the close of the
comment period to the following
address: Room 424–E, Hubert H.
Humphrey Building, 200 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20201.
(Because access to the interior of the
Hubert H. Humphrey Building is not
readily available to persons without
Federal Government identification,
commenters are encouraged to leave
their comments in the mail drop slots
located in the main lobby of the
building. A stamp-in clock is available
for persons wishing to retain proof of
filing by stamping in and retaining an
extra copy of the comments being filed.)
Comments mailed to the addresses
indicated as appropriate for hand or
courier delivery may be delayed and
received after the comment period.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 May 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
Submission of comments on
paperwork requirements. You may
submit comments on this document’s
paperwork requirements by mailing
your comments to the addresses
provided at the end of the ‘‘Collection
of Information Requirements’’ section in
this document.
Submitting Comments: We welcome
comments from the public on all issues
set forth in this proposed rule to assist
us in fully considering issues and
developing policies. You can assist us
by referencing the file code ASPE:LTCI
and the specific ‘‘issue identifier’’ that
precedes the section on which you
choose to comment.
Inspection of Public Comments: All
comments received before the close of
the comment period are available for
viewing by the public, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the
comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have
been received: https://
www.Regulations.gov. Click on the link
‘‘Comment or Submission’’ on that Web
site to view public comments.
Comments received timely will also
be available for public inspection as
they are received, generally beginning
approximately 3 weeks after publication
of a document, at the headquarters of
the Department of Health and Human
Services, 200 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20201, Monday
through Friday of each week from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an
appointment to view public comments,
phone 1–800–XXX–XXXX.
Electronic Access
This Federal Register document is
also available from the Federal Register
online database through GPO Access, a
service of the U.S. Government Printing
Office. Free public access is available on
a Wide Area Information Server (WAIS)
through the Internet and via
asynchronous dial-in. Internet users can
access the database by using the World
Wide Web; the Superintendent of
Documents’ home page address is
https://www.gpoaccess.gov/, by using
local WAIS client software, or by telnet
to swais.access.gpo.gov, then login as
guest (no password required). Dial-in
users should use communications
software and modem to call (202) 512–
1661; type swais, then login as guest (no
password required).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hunter McKay, (202) 205–8999.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
30031
I. Scope of This Proposed Rule
This proposed rule describes the
reporting requirements that we are
proposing to require of all insurers that
issue qualified long-term care insurance
policies under the State Long-Term Care
Partnership Program. In addition to
publishing these regulations, The
Department anticipates taking other
actions to further the implementation of
the Partnership for Long Term Care. One
such action is publication in the near
future of a Federal Register Notice
containing Partnership State Reciprocity
Standards. This standard outlines an
agreement whereby states can provide
Medicaid asset disregards for
Partnership policies purchased in other
states.
II. Background
(If you choose to comment on issues
in this section, please include the
caption ‘‘History of Partnership
Programs’’ at the beginning of your
comment.)
A. Historical Overview of State LongTerm Care Partnership Programs
1. Initial Development of Programs
In the late 1980’s, a number of State
Medicaid programs began to work with
private insurance companies to create a
bridge between Medicaid and insurance
for long-term care. The goal of these
collaborations was to create private
insurance policies that were more
affordable and provide better financial
protection to consumers against large
liabilities for long-term care costs than
the policies generally available at that
time. The result of these collaborations
was the establishment of State LongTerm Care Partnership Programs that
provided for expanded access to
Medicaid by allowing applicants who
use long-term care insurance policies to
have higher assets and still be eligible
for Medicaid. The additional amount of
assets that an individual is allowed to
have is equivalent to the amount paid
by the insurance policy on his or her
behalf. These State partnerships
provided an incentive for insurers to
offer affordable, high quality benefits
and for consumers to protect themselves
against the high cost of long-term care
through the purchase of insurance
policies that can be used in conjunction
with benefits provided under Medicaid.
Four States (California, Connecticut,
Indiana, and New York) initially
implemented Partnership Programs in
1993. As part of the implementation
process, each State outlined a set of data
reporting requirements for participating
insurers. The data that were to be
collected were intended to allow each
E:\FR\FM\23MYP1.SGM
23MYP1
30032
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 101 / Friday, May 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
State to monitor program activities and
evaluate the impact of the Partnership
Program on Medicaid long-term care
expenditures. The insurers who
participated in these partnerships
recommended, as part of the design of
the data collection requirements, that
the participating States use a unified set
of reporting requirements to streamline
the reporting burden on the
participating insurers. The participating
insurers believed that if each State
designed its own reporting
requirements, the administrative costs
for the program would be prohibitive.
The four States agreed with the
participating insurers and adopted a
uniform set of reporting criteria.
The four initial States launched their
Partnership Programs using existing
State authority through amendments to
their State Medicaid plans. Each State
requested a change in the treatment of
assets in the Medicaid financial
eligibility test. No other Federal
authority was necessary at that time to
operate the programs.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
2. Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1993
The Omnibus Reconciliation Act of
1993 (OBRA 1993), Public Law 103–66,
contained language that changed the
conditions under which Medicaid State
plan amendments relating to asset
disregards for private long-term care
insurance could be approved. OBRA
1993 allowed California, Connecticut,
Indiana, and New York, as well as Iowa
and Massachusetts, to continue their
initial Long-Term Care Partnership
Programs. However, OBRA 1993
specified a set of requirements for any
additional States that chose to operate a
Partnership Program. Any State, other
than the initial four partnership States,
that sought a Medicaid State plan
amendment on or after May 14, 1993
was required to abide by the following
additional conditions:
a. Estate Recovery
States establishing Long-Term Care
Partnership Programs on or after May
14, 1993, were required to recover from
the estates of Medicaid recipients in
States with partnership agreements
expenses incurred for the provision of
long-term health care under Medicaid.
Assets that were disregarded in the
initial financial eligibility process were
also exempt from estate recovery in the
initial four States with Partnership
Programs. States establishing new
Partnership Programs were only allowed
to disregard assets in the initial
eligibility process but not in the estate
recovery process. After a Medicaid
recipient who had a long-term care
insurance policy issued under a State
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 May 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
Long-Term Partnership Program died,
the State was required to recover an
amount equivalent to what Medicaid
spent on his or her behalf from the
deceased recipient’s estate, including
any protected assets under the State
Long-Term Care Partnership Program.
b. No Waiver of Estate Recovery
States establishing Long-Term Care
Partnership Programs on or after May
14, 1993, were precluded from waiving
the estate recovery requirement for
Medicaid recipients who had obtained
long-term care insurance policies under
a State Long-Term Care Partnership
Program.
c. Expanded Definition of Estate
States establishing Long-Term Care
Partnership Program on or after May 14,
1993, were also required to use a
specific definition of ‘‘estate’’ for
recovery purposes when recovery of
Medicaid expenditures was against the
estates of Medicaid recipients who had
obtained long-term care insurance
policies issued under a State Long-Term
Care Partnership Program. This
definition was more expansive than the
definition that was generally used by
States.
While OBRA 1993 did not forbid
additional States from attempting to
establish new Long-Term Care
Partnership Programs under the new
conditions, the impact was essentially
the same as a ban. A few States tried
unsuccessfully to launch partnership
programs under the new conditions.
Other interested States passed enabling
legislation with contingency language
that allowed the State to proceed if the
OBRA 1993 partnership provisions were
repealed. No subsequent Federal
legislation related to Long-Term Care
Partnership Programs was enacted until
Public Law 109–171 (the DRA of 2005).
As discussed in detail under section
II.A.3. of this proposed rule, the DRA of
2005 included provisions that allow
States to offer specific asset disregards
for Medicaid eligibility purposes under
a new set of conditions.
3. Deficit Reduction Act (DRA) of 2005
Section 6021(a)(1) of the DRA of 2005
amended section 1917(b)(1)(C)(i) and
added new sections 1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)
through (vi) to the Act that provide for
an expansion of State long-term care
insurance partnerships through a new
set of conditions. Under this provision,
States may establish qualified State
long-term care insurance partnerships,
defined in the Act as an approved
Medicaid State plan amendment under
Title XIX of the Act that provides for the
disregard of any assets or resources in
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
an amount equal to the insurance
benefit payments that are made to or on
behalf of an individual who is a
beneficiary under a long-term care
insurance policy if certain requirements
specified in sections 1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(I)
through (VII) of the Act are met. In other
words, States establishing Partnership
Programs must offer a dollar of asset
disregard for every dollar paid out
under a long-term care insurance policy
issued under a State Long-Term Care
Partnership Program.
Section 1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(II) of the Act
provides that the insurance policy must
be a qualified long-term care insurance
policy as defined in section 7702B(b) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, that
is issued not earlier than the effective
date of the State plan amendment. (If an
individual has an existing long-term
care insurance policy that does not
qualify as a qualified partnership policy
due to the issue date of the policy, and
that policy is exchanged for another
policy, the State insurance
commissioner or other State authority
must determine the issue date for the
policy that is received in exchange.
Under this provision, a long-term care
insurance policy includes a certificate
issued under a group insurance
contract.)
Among other requirements specified
in the statute for qualified long-term
care insurance partnerships—
• The long-term care insurance policy
must (1) be issued to an insured
individual who is a resident of the State
in which coverage first became effective
under the policy (sections
1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(I) of the Act); (2) be
certified by the State insurance
commissioner or other appropriate
authority that the policy meets specific
provisions of the National Association
of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC)
October 2000 Model Regulation and
Model Act (sections
1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(III) and 1917(b)(5)(B)
of the Act); and (3) include certain
protections against inflation on an
annual basis (section
1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(IV) of the Act).
• The State Medicaid agency must
provide information and technical
assistance to the State insurance
department on the insurance
department’s role of assuring that any
individual who sells a long-term care
insurance policy under the partnership
receives training and demonstrates
evidence of an understanding of such
policies and how they relate to other
public and private coverage of long-term
care (section 1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(V) of the
Act).
• Issuers of long-term care insurance
policies under a State qualified long-
E:\FR\FM\23MYP1.SGM
23MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 101 / Friday, May 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
term care insurance partnership must
provide regular reports to the Secretary,
in accordance with regulations of the
Secretary, that include notification
regarding when benefits provided under
the policy have been paid and the
amount of such benefits paid,
notification regarding when the policy
otherwise terminates, and such other
information as the Secretary determines
may be appropriate to the
administration of State long-term care
insurance partnerships (section
1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(VI) of the Act). Section
1917(b)(1)(C)(v) of the Act provides that
the regulations required under section
1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(VI) of the Act shall be
promulgated after consultation with the
NAIC, issuers of long-term care
insurance policies, States with
experience with long-term care
insurance partnership plans, other
States, and representatives of consumers
of long-term care insurance policies,
and shall specify the type and format of
the data to be reported and the
frequency with which such reports are
to be made. In addition, the Secretary,
as appropriate, shall provide copies of
the reports provided in accordance with
that clause to the State involved.
• The State may not impose any
requirement affecting the terms of
benefits of a policy under the
partnership program unless the State
imposes such requirement on long-term
care insurance policies without regard
to whether the policy is covered under
the partnership or is offered in
connection with such a partnership
(section 1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(VII) of the
Act).
Section 1917(b)(1)(C)(iv) of the Act
provides that a State that had a State
plan amendment approved as of May
14, 1993, satisfies the requirements of
the statute under clause (II) and may
continue as a qualified partnership
program if the Secretary determines that
the State plan amendment provides for
consumer protection standards that are
no less stringent than the consumer
protection standards that applied under
such a State plan amendment as of
December 31, 2005.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
B. Implementing Regulations
Currently, there are no Federal
regulations directly related to State
operation of State Long-Term Care
Partnership Programs. In areas in which
the program coordinates benefits with
Medicaid coverage of long-term care, the
existing Medicaid regulations at 42 CFR
Chapter IV, Subchapter C, are
applicable. In 2006, States were
provided with guidance on the
implementation of State Long-Term
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 May 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
Care Partnership Programs under the
DRA of 2005.
To implement section
1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(VI) and
1917(b)(1)(C)(iv) of the Act, as directed
by the statute, we are proposing to set
forth in regulations the requirements for
reporting information and data on
qualified long-term care insurance
policies issued under State Long-Term
Care Partnership Programs under an
approved State plan amendment.
C. States Currently Operating LongTerm Care Partnership Programs
California, Connecticut, Indiana,
Iowa, Massachusetts, and New York had
approved State Long-Term Partnership
Programs under an approved State plan
amendment as of May 14, 1993. They
were ‘‘grandfathered’’ as satisfying the
statutorily imposed requirements when
pursuant to section 1917(b)(1)(C)(iv) of
the Act, the Secretary determined that
the State plan amendments of these
States provide protection no less
stringent than that applied under their
State plan amendments as of December
31, 2005.
As of December 2007, seven other
States offer State Long-Term Care
Partnership policies for sale under the
DRA provisions: Florida, Idaho, Kansas,
Minnesota, Nebraska, South Dakota, and
Virginia. Nine States have approved
State plan amendments for qualified
State Long-Term Care Partnership
Programs although policies had not yet
been issued pursuant to those programs:
Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Iowa,
Minnesota, Missouri, North Dakota,
Nevada, Ohio, and Oregon. Four States
have submitted State plan amendments
for which approval is pending: Arizona,
New Hampshire, Oklahoma, and
Pennsylvania. Ten other States are in
the process of developing Partnership
Programs: Illinois, Maine, Maryland,
Michigan, Montana, New Jersey, Rhode
Island, Texas, Vermont, and Wisconsin.
III. Provisions of This Proposed Rule
A. Legislative Authority
As stated earlier, the DRA of 2005
requires insurers participating in State
Long-Term Care Partnership Programs
to provide regular reports to the
Secretary in a manner in accordance
with regulations of the Secretary. The
reports must include notification
regarding when benefits provided under
the policy have been paid and the
amount of the benefits paid, notification
regarding when the policy otherwise
terminates, and any other information as
the Secretary determines may be
appropriate to the administration of
State long-term care insurance
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
30033
partnerships. Section 1917(b)(1)(C )(iv)
of the Act provides that the regulations
required under section
1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(VI) must be
promulgated after consultation with the
NAIC, issuers of long-term care
insurance policies, States with
experience with long-term care
insurance partnership plans, other
States, and representatives of consumers
of long-term care insurance policies,
and must specify the type and format of
the data to be reported and the
frequency with which the reports are to
be made. In addition, the Secretary, as
appropriate, must provide copies of the
reports provided in accordance with
that clause to the State involved.
B. Collaboration With States, Insurers,
Insurance Regulators, and Consumers in
the Development of Reporting
Requirements
(If you choose to comment on issues
in this section, please include the
caption ‘‘Consultations with
Stakeholders’’ at the beginning of your
comment.)
In accordance with section
1917(b)(1)(C)(iv) of the Act, as added by
the DRA of 2005, we have consulted
with numerous stakeholders in the
development of the reporting
requirements presented in this proposed
rule. In addition to one-on-one
consultations with stakeholders
representing States, insurers,
consumers, and regulators, we have
established a Technical Expert Panel to
provide a forum for the exchange of
ideas, perspectives, and expertise
regarding the specification of individual
data items. The Technical Expert Panel
consists of approximately 25 members
representing insurers, States, consumer
organizations, the NAIC, the Federal
Government, and the policy research
community. The panel members were
selected in January 2007, from
responses to invitations sent by HHS
along with an initial draft of the
reporting requirements. We held
numerous meetings and teleconferences
with the panel members to discuss and
further develop the draft reporting
requirements and to obtain further input
on partnership implementation. The
reporting requirements presented in this
proposed rule represent the product of
this ongoing stakeholder input process.
We plan to work on an ongoing basis
with the Technical Expert Panel.
C. Specific Proposed Reporting
Requirements
(If you choose to comment on issues
in this section, please include the
caption ‘‘Types of Data to be Reported’’
at the beginning of your comment.)
E:\FR\FM\23MYP1.SGM
23MYP1
30034
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 101 / Friday, May 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
In consultation with stakeholders and
the Technical Expert Panel, we have
developed proposed requirements for
insurers for reporting data under the
State Long-Term Care Partnership
Program under two categories: (1)
Registry data; and (2) claims data. These
two categories would require the
submission of data in four distinct file
types. Generally, participating long-term
care insurers would report under only
two of these files. For all four file types,
we are proposing to require insurers to
report on only those insured
individuals, policyholders, and
claimants who have active qualified
long-term care insurance partnership
policies or certificates. The proposed
reporting requirements would not apply
to insurance policies or certificates that
are not partnership qualified.
Insurer reporting specifications would
be detailed in an HHS document
entitled ‘‘State Long-Term Care
Partnership Insurer Reporting
Requirements’’ which we expect will be
available from https://aspe.hhs.gov/
daltcp/reports/2008/PartRepReq.pdf no
later than June 1, 2008. We are in the
process of developing an integrated
database through which insurers would
submit these data. We are proposing
that data would be submitted through a
secure Web site that meets all current
Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act requirements for
security of personal health information.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
1. Registry Data
We are proposing to require insurers
to report data, on a semiannual basis, on
all insured individuals who have been
issued qualified long-term care
insurance policies or certificates under
qualified State Long-Term Care
Partnership Programs; that is, for the 6month reporting periods of January 1
through June 30 and July 1 through
December 31 of each year. The reports
must include data on qualified longterm care insurance partnership policies
sold on either an individual basis or a
group basis, as long as individual-level
data are available to the insurer. These
data include, but are not limited to, the
following:
• Current identifying information on
each insured individual.
• The name of the insurance
company and the issuing State.
• The effective date and terms of
coverage under the policy.
• The coverage period and benefits.
• The annual premium.
• Other information as specified by
the Secretary in ‘‘State Long-Term Care
Insurance Partnership Insurer Reporting
Instructions.’’
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 May 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
2. Claims Data
We are proposing to require insurers
to report data, for each quarter of the
calendar year, on all benefit claims paid
for all insured individuals who have
been issued qualified long-term care
insurance policies or certificates
(individual policies or under group
coverage plans) under qualified State
Long-Term Care Partnership Programs.
These data include, but are not limited
to, the following:
• Current identifying information on
the insured individual.
• The type and cash amount of the
benefits paid during the reporting
period and lifetime to date.
• Remaining lifetime benefits.
• Other information as specified by
the Secretary in ‘‘State Long-Term Care
Insurance Partnership Insurer Reporting
Instructions.’’
3. Frequency of Reports and Deadlines
for Submission
(If you choose to comment on issues
in this section, please include the
caption ‘‘Frequency and Deadlines for
Reports’’ at the beginning of your
comment.)
We are proposing to require insurers
to submit data for different reporting
periods, depending upon the file type.
We are proposing to require insurers
to submit the required registry data to
the Secretary on a semiannual basis;
that is, for the 6-month reporting period
of January 1 through June 30 and July
1 through December 31 of each year.
The proposed deadline for submittal of
registry data reports is 30 days after the
end of the reporting period.
4. Transition Provision
For insurers who have issued or
exchanged a qualified Partnership
policy prior to the effective date of the
final regulations we issue, we are
proposing a transition provision. We are
proposing that the first reports required
for these insurers will be the reports that
pertain to the reporting period that
begins no more than 120 days after the
effective date of the final regulations.
5. Format and Manner of Reporting Data
(If you choose to comment on issues
in this section, please include the
caption ‘‘Format for Reports’’ at the
beginning of your comment.)
We are proposing to require that
insurers submit the required data in the
format and manner specified by the
Secretary in the HHS-issued insurer
reporting specifications document,
‘‘State Long-Term Care Insurance
Partnership Insurer Reporting
Instructions.’’ As we mentioned earlier,
we are in the process of developing an
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
integrated database that would be
accessible through a secure Web site,
and we plan to issue instructions as to
how insurers would access and input
the required data into the HHS reporting
system.
6. Use of Submitted Reports
(If you choose to comment on issues
in this section, please include the
caption ‘‘Use of Reports’’ at the
beginning of your comment.)
The overall purpose of the data is
twofold, first to be used in efforts to
monitor program performance at both
the state and federal level, and second
to provide data for a longer-term
evaluation of the effectiveness of the
Partnership program. HHS and the
States participating in the State LongTerm Care Partnership Program would
use the information provided by
insurers in compliance with the
proposed reporting requirements for
analytical studies and for program
monitoring. The data provided by each
insurer would reflect the combined
experience of all State Long-Term Care
Partnership Programs in terms of
policies sold and benefits used. We plan
to use the data to produce reports for
Congress and other interested
stakeholders on the implementation of
the State Long-Term Care Partnership
Program. In addition, we plan to use the
data to generate individual State-level
reports that would be used by the States
to track the implementation of the
Partnership Program at the State level.
HHS does not intend to use the data
to determine asset disregard levels for
individuals who participate in the State
Long-Term Care Partnership Program
and eventually apply for Medicaid
coverage. We would not collect data on
‘‘point in time’’ information regarding
the amount of insurance benefits used
by claimants, nor exact information on
when private insurance benefits may be
exhausted, which clearly would depend
upon how claimants use benefits to
purchase long-term care services. The
computation of asset disregard levels
and the determination of Medicaid
eligibility coverage are matters that will
be dealt with among the insurer, the
insured individual, and the State
Medicaid eligibility office. We expect
that when insured individuals exhaust
their insurance coverage (or otherwise
become eligible for Medicaid prior to
the exhaustion of benefits), insurers will
provide them with documentation of
their participation in the State LongTerm Care Partnership Program and of
the amount of benefits that the insured
received. This documentation will
become part of the entire documentation
provided by the insured individual at
E:\FR\FM\23MYP1.SGM
23MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 101 / Friday, May 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
the time he or she applies for Medicaid.
The Medicaid eligibility office will then
determine, based upon the
documentation provided by the
applicant, the asset disregard level that
will be applied.
It is possible that State Medicaid
programs may wish to access the
collected data for monitoring purposes,
to help them anticipate the number of
insured individuals who may become
eligible for Medicaid asset disregards
over a projected time period. For
example, through reports provided to
each State from the integrated database,
States would know how many
partnership policyholders are ‘‘in
claim’’ during any 3-month reporting
period. States would also know,
approximately, to what extent
policyholders who are in claim have
utilized the insurance benefits for which
they are eligible and the amount of
benefits remaining under their policy
maximums. However, once an insured
individual exhausts his or her insurance
benefits under the policy, his or her
eligibility for Medicaid would still
depend upon the amount of available
assets he or she retains, relative to his
or her asset disregard, as well as other
Medicaid eligibility criteria. For
example, an insured individual may be
eligible for an asset disregard of
$150,000, but still retains $250,000 in
countable assets. In this case, he or she
would have to spend down $100,000 of
his or her available assets before
applying for Medicaid coverage. Thus,
in general terms, States would be able
to use the data to project future
applications for Medicaid (and their
potential budgetary impacts) but, at the
individual level, the specific financial
circumstances of each insured
individual would determine his or her
eligibility for Medicaid coverage.
D. Additional State-Mandated Reporting
Requirements
(If you choose to comment on issues
in this section, please include the
caption ‘‘Additional State Reporting’’ at
the beginning of your comment.)
The DRA explicitly states that there is
nothing in the statute that prohibits
States from imposing additional
reporting requirements on insurers
participating in the Long-Term Care
Partnership Program, beyond the
Federal reporting requirements that we
are proposing in this proposed rule.
However, we believe that the
information that would be made
available to the Secretary and to the
States participating in the Long-Term
Care Partnership Program through these
proposed mandated reporting
requirements would be sufficient to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 May 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
meet the policy analysis and program
monitoring needs of the States. We, as
well as the stakeholders participating in
the development of these proposed
reporting requirements, attempted to
achieve a proper balance between the
legitimate needs of the Federal
Government and State governments to
monitor the implementation and
operation of the State Long-Term Care
Partnership Program, and the desire not
to impose undue cost burdens on
participating insurers, to the point
where they may consider it not
economically beneficial to participate in
the Partnership Program.
E. Confidentiality of Information
(If you choose to comment on issues
in this section, please include the
caption ‘‘Confidentiality’’ at the
beginning of your comment.)
We are proposing to provide in the
regulations that the data collected and
reported under the requirements of the
regulations in this proposed rule would
be subject to the confidentiality of
information requirements specified in
regulations under 42 CFR Part 401,
Subpart B, and 45 CFR Part 5, Subpart
F and any other applicable
confidentiality statute or regulation.
F. Provision of Reports to Partnership
States
(If you choose to comment on issues
in this section, please include the
caption ‘‘Furnishing Reports to States’’
at the beginning of your comment.)
Section 1917(b)(1)(C)(v) of the Act
provides that the Secretary, as
appropriate, must provide copies of the
reports provided by insurers to the State
involved. We plan to make reports
containing the reported data available to
States in a timely and efficient manner.
G. Incorporation of Reporting
Requirements in the Code of Federal
Regulations
(If you choose to comment on issues
in this section, please include the
caption ‘‘Regulation Text’’ at the
beginning of your comment.)
We are proposing to establish under
Title 45, Subtitle A, Subchapter B, Part
144 of the Code of Federal Regulations
a new Subpart B to incorporate the
requirements for the reporting of data by
insurers on qualified long-term care
insurance policies issued under State
Long-Term Care Partnership Programs
that are established under an approved
Medicaid State plan amendment.
Specifically—
Proposed § 144.200 contains the basis
for the regulations.
Proposed § 144.202 includes
definitions used throughout the subpart.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
30035
Proposed § 144.204 specifies the
applicability of the regulations under
the subpart.
Proposed § 144.206 specifies the
requirements for reporting of long-term
care partnership program data and the
frequency with which insurers must
report the data.
Proposed § 144.208 specifies the
deadlines for submission of reports.
Proposed § 144.210 specifies the
format and manner in which the data
are to be reported.
Proposed § 144.212 specifies the
confidentiality of information
requirements that will be applied.
Proposed § 144.214 specifies the
action that the Secretary will take if an
insurer fails to report the required data
by the specified deadlines.
IV. Response to Public Comments
Because of the large number of public
comments that we normally receive on
Federal Register documents, we are not
able to acknowledge or respond to them
individually. We will consider all
comments we receive by the date and
time specified in the DATES section of
the preamble of this proposed rule, and,
when we proceed with a subsequent
document, we will respond to the
comments in the preamble to that
document.
V. Collection of Information
Requirements
The Department of Health and Human
Services has determined that this notice
of proposed rulemaking contains
information collections that are subject
to review by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3501–3520). In compliance with the
requirement of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the PRA, the Office of the Secretary
(OS), Department of Health and Human
Services, is publishing the following
summary of a proposed information
collection request for public comment.
Further, the Department acknowledges
that this regulation is covered under the
Privacy Act and that this collection of
data constitutes a System of Records.
The Department anticipates publishing
a System of Records Notice. Interested
persons are invited to send comments
regarding this burden estimate or any
other aspect of this collection of
information, including any of the
following subjects: (1) The necessity and
utility of the proposed information
collection for the proper performance of
the agency’s functions; (2) the accuracy
of the estimated burden; (3) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(4) the use of automated collection
E:\FR\FM\23MYP1.SGM
23MYP1
30036
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 101 / Friday, May 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
techniques or other forms of information
technology to minimize the information
collection burden.
To obtain copies of the supporting
statement and any related forms for the
proposed paperwork collections
described below, e-mail your request,
including your name, address, phone
number, as well as the caption
‘‘Collection of Information
Requirements’’ at the beginning of your
comment, to
Sherette.funncoleman@hhs.gov, or call
the Reports Clearance Office on (202)
690–6162. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collections must be
received with 60 days.
Title: Partnership for Long-Term Care
Insurer Reporting Requirements.
Description: This information
collected under the proposed rule is
intended for insurers participating in
the Partnership for Long-Term Care as
authorized by the Deficit Reduction Act
of 2005. Insurers will provide data in
the proscribed format to the Department
on Partnership certified long-term care
insurance policies. The requirements
include the identity of the policy
holder, the type of coverage purchased
and the amount of insurance benefits
used. Data from this submission will be
provided to state Medicaid agencies to
assist in determining the amount of
asset protection earned by program
participants.
It is estimated that insurers
participating in the Partnership will be
able to provide the necessary reports
from data currently within their
insurance operations systems. Fulfilling
the reporting requirements will require
that they write programs to extract the
data in the manner specified by the
Department. There are no costs to the
respondents, other than their time.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS AND BURDEN COSTS
CFR section
Type of
respondent
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondents
Average
response per
respondent
(in hours)
Total burden
hours
45 CFR 144.206 ...............................
Insurers ............................................
30
6
45/60
135
Public comments addressed as a
result of this notice will be taken into
account in the formal OMB request for
clearance for this data collection. Prior
to the effective date of this final rule,
HHS will publish a notice in the
Federal Register announcing OMB’s
decision to approve, modify, or
disapprove the new information
collection provisions in the final rule.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). A regulatory impact analysis
(RIA) must be prepared for major rules
with economically significant effects
($100 million or more in any 1 year).
While we have determined that this
proposed rule is not economically
significant, it is however a significant
regulatory action. We estimate that the
aggregate cost to participating private
insurers of implementing the reporting
requirements in this proposed rule
would be approximately $1,500,000.
VI. Regulatory Impact Analysis
(If you choose to comment on issues
in this section, please include the
caption ‘‘Impact’’ at the beginning of
your comment.)
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
A. Overall Impact
We have examined the impacts of this
proposed rule as required by Executive
Order 12866 (September 1993,
Regulatory Planning and Review) and
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(September 19, 1980, Pub. L. 96–354),
section 1102(b) of the Social Security
Act, the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4), and
Executive Order 13132.
B. Executive Order 12866
Executive Order 12866 (as amended
by Executive Order 13258, which
merely reassigns responsibility of
duties) directs agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 May 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
The RFA requires agencies to analyze
options for regulatory relief of small
businesses. For purposes of the RFA,
small entities include small businesses,
nonprofit organizations, and
government agencies. Most insurance
companies are not considered to be
small entities because they generally
have revenues of more than $29 million
in any 1 year. (For details, see the Small
Business Administration’s final rule that
sets forth size standards for industries at
65 FR 69432, November 17, 2000.) For
purposes of the RFA, all insurance
companies are not considered to be
small entities. Individuals and States are
not included in the definition of a small
entity. However, we are soliciting
comments on our estimates and analysis
of the impact of this proposed rule on
insurers.
There are approximately 100
insurance companies located
nationwide that issue long-term care
insurance policies. We expect that, of
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
these 100 companies, approximately 30
insurance companies will participate in
qualified State Long-Term Care
Partnership Programs. Currently, there
are 15 to 20 companies operating in
States that are selling or have issued
qualified long-term care insurance
policies under the State Long-Term Care
Partnership Programs. As of December
2007, approximately 300,000 policies
have been sold. We believe this
represents approximately 80 percent of
the policies that might be sold when the
Partnership Programs are established
nationwide. We anticipate that the
number of insurance companies selling
qualified long-term care insurance
partnership policies might increase by
about 10 as more States obtain approved
State plan amendments to operate State
Long-Term Care Partnership Programs.
As we stated earlier, insurers
participating in the original four
Partnership Programs have been
reporting data on policies sold and
benefits used in the program for more
than a decade. The proposed reporting
requirements in this proposed rule were
designed to take advantage of data
already available in insurer data sets.
Insurers would not be asked to collect
new data, but simply to recode existing
data into a common format for
submission to the Secretary. It is
estimated that participating insurers
would have to make a one-time
investment to produce the computer
programs necessary to compile the
reports. Should the reporting
requirement change in the future there
will also be a cost to make the necessary
changes. We are estimating that the
E:\FR\FM\23MYP1.SGM
23MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 101 / Friday, May 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
programming would require 400 hours
of labor on average (this number will
vary widely by company depending the
type of systems used) to create the
necessary changes. We also estimate an
average cost per hour of programming
time of $125. The cost per company is
estimated at $50,000 and the total
estimate for all companies is estimated
at $1.5 million.
Subsequently, there would be a much
smaller investment to run the quarterly
and semi-annually reports. The data
submissions were designed to be
primarily snapshots of data elements in
the insurers’ files with very little
tabulation or summary reporting. We
note that all of the currently
participating insurers participated in the
development of the proposed reporting
requirements in this proposed rule and
have given their consensus to the
proposed requirements.
D. Small Rural Hospitals
In addition, section 1102(b) of the Act
requires us to prepare a regulatory
impact analysis for any proposed rule
(and subsequent final rule) that may
have a significant impact on the
operations of a substantial number of
small rural hospitals. This analysis must
conform to the provisions of section 603
of the RFA. This proposed rule does not
affect small rural hospitals.
E. Unfunded Mandates
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4) also requires that agencies assess
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule whose mandates
require spending in any 1 year of $100
million in 1995 dollars, updated
annually for inflation. That threshold
level is currently approximately $120
million. This proposed rule would not
mandate any requirements for State,
local, or tribal governments. However, it
would affect private sector costs to
insurance companies who sell qualified
long-term care insurance partnership
policies. We note that participation by
insurers in the Partnership Program is
voluntary. We have also determined that
the costs of reporting the required data
are not significant.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
F. Federalism
Executive Order 13132 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates a
proposed rule (and subsequent final
rule) that imposes substantial direct
requirement costs on State and local
governments, preempts State law, or
otherwise has Federalism implications.
As stated above, this proposed rule
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 May 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
would not have a substantial effect on
State and local governments.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 144
Health care, Health insurance,
Reporting and recordkeeping.
For the reasons stated in the preamble
of this proposed rule, we are proposing
to amend 45 CFR subtitle A, subchapter
B, part 144 as set forth below:
Subchapter B—Requirements Relating to
Health Care Access
30037
experience with long-term care
insurance partnership plans, other
States, and representative of consumers
of long-term care insurance policies,
and shall specify the type and format of
the data to be reported and the
frequency with which such reports are
to be made. This section of the statute
also provides that the Secretary provide
copies of the reports to the States
involved.
§ 144.202
Definitions.
Subpart B—Qualified State Long-Term
Care Insurance Partnerships:
Reporting Requirements for Insurers
As used in this subpart—
Partnership qualified policy refers to
a qualified long-term insurance policy
issued under a qualified State long-term
care insurance partnership.
Qualified long-term insurance care
policy means an insurance policy that
has been determined by a state
insurance commissioner to meet the
requirements of sections
1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(I) through (IV) and
1917(b)(5) of the Act. It includes a
certificate issued under a group
insurance contract.
Qualified State long-term care
insurance partnership means an
approved Medicaid State plan
amendment that provides for the
disregard of any assets or resources in
an amount equal to the insurance
benefit payments that are made to or on
behalf of an individual who is a
beneficiary under a long-term care
insurance policy that has been
determined by a state insurance
commissioner to meet the requirements
of section 1917(b)(a)(C)(iii) of the Act. It
includes any Medicaid State plan
amendment approved as of May 4, 1993,
that meets the requirements of section
1917(b)(1)(C)(iii) of the Act and for
which the Secretary determines that the
State plan amendment provides for
consumer protection standards that are
no less stringent than the consumer
protection standards that applied under
the State plan amendment as of
December 31, 2005.
§ 144.200
§ 144.204
PART 144—REQUIREMENTS
RELATING TO HEALTH INSURANCE
COVERAGE
1. The authority citation for part 144
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 2701 through 2763, 2791,
and 2792 of the Public Health Service Act (42
U.S.C. 300gg through 300gg–63, 300gg–91,
300gg–92 as amended by HIPAA (Pub. L.
104–191, 110 Stat. 1936), MHPA (Pub. L.
104–204, 110 Stat. 2944, as amended by Pub.
L. 107–116, 115 Stat. 2177), NMHPA (Pub. L.
104–204, 110 Stat. 2935), WHCRA (Pub. L.
105–227, 112 Stat. 2681–436)) and section
103(c)(4) of HIPAA; and secs. 1102 and
1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(VI) of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 1302 and
1396p(b)(1)(C)(iii)(VI)).
2. A new subpart B is added to read
as follows:
Subpart B—Qualified State Long-Term Care
Insurance Partnerships: Reporting
Requirements for Insurers
Sec.
144.200 Basis.
144.202 Definitions.
144.204 Applicability of regulations.
144.206 Reporting requirements.
144.208 Deadlines for submission of
reports.
144.210 Form and manner of reports.
144.212 Confidentiality of information.
144.214 Actions for noncompliance with
reporting requirements.
Basis.
This subpart implements—
(a) Section 1917(b)(1)(C) (iii)(VI) of
the Social Security Act, (Act) which
requires the issuer of a long-term care
insurance policy issued under a
qualified State long-term care insurance
partnership to provide specified regular
reports to the Secretary. (b) Section
1917(b)(1)(C)(v) of the Act, which
specifies that the regulations of the
Secretary under section 1917(b)(1)(C)
(iii)(VI) of the Act shall be promulgated
after consultation with the National
Association of Insurance
Commissioners, issuers of long-term
care insurance policies, States with
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Applicability of regulations.
The regulations contained in this
subpart for reporting data apply only to
those insurers that have issued qualified
long-term care insurance policies to
individuals under a qualified State longterm care insurance partnership.
§ 144.206
Reporting requirements.
(a) General requirement. Any insurer
that sells a qualified long-term care
insurance policy under a qualified State
long-term care insurance partnership
must submit, in accordance with the
requirements of this section, data on
insured individuals, policyholders, and
claimants who have active partnership
E:\FR\FM\23MYP1.SGM
23MYP1
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
30038
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 101 / Friday, May 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
qualified policies or certificates for a
reporting period.
(b) Specific requirements. Insurers of
qualified long-term care insurance
policies must submit the following data
to the Secretary by the deadlines
specified in paragraph (c) of this
section:
(1) Registry of active individual and
group partnership qualified policies or
certificates. (i) Insurers must submit
data on—
(A) Any insured individual who held
an active partnership qualified policy or
certificate at any point during a
reporting period, even if the policy or
certificate was subsequently cancelled,
lost partnership qualified status, or
otherwise terminated during the
reporting period; and
(B) All active group long-term care
partnership qualified insurance policies,
even if the identity of the individual
policy/certificate holder is unavailable.
(ii) The data required under paragraph
(b)(1)(i) of this section must cover a
6-month reporting period of January
through June 30 or July 1 through
December 31 of each year; and
(iii) The data must include, but are
not limited to—
(A) Current identifying information
on the insured individual;
(B) The name of the insurance
company and issuing State;
(C) The effective date and terms of
coverage under the policy.
(D) The annual premium.
(E) The coverage period.
(F) Other information, as specified by
the Secretary in ‘‘State Long-Term Care
Partnership Insurer Reporting
Instructions.’’
(2) Claims paid under partnership
qualified policies or certificates.
Insurers must submit data on all
partnership qualified policies or
certificates for which the insurer paid at
least one claim during the reporting
period. This includes data for employerpaid core plans and buy-up plans
without individual insured data. The
data must—
(i) Cover a quarterly reporting period
of 3 months;
(ii) Include, but are not limited to—
(A) Current identifying information
on the insured individual;
(B) The type and cash amount of the
benefits paid during the reporting
period and lifetime to date;
(C) Remaining lifetime benefits;
(D) Other information, as specified by
the Secretary in ‘‘State Long-Term Care
Partnership Insurer Reporting
Instructions.’’
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:17 May 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
§ 144.208
reports.
Deadlines for submission of
(a) Transition provision for insurers
who have issued or exchanged a
qualified partnership policy prior to the
effective date of these regulations. The
first reports required for these insurers
will be the reports that pertain to the
reporting period that begins no more
than 120 days after the effective date of
the final regulations.
(b) All reports on the registry of
qualified long-term care insurance
policies issued to individual and
individuals under group coverage
specified in § 144.206(b)(1)(ii) must be
submitted within 30 days of the end of
the 6-month reporting period.
(c) All reports on the claims paid
under qualified long-term care
insurance policies issued to individual
and individuals under group coverage
specified in § 144.206(b)(2)(i) must be
submitted within 30 days of the end of
the 3-month quarterly reporting period.
§ 144.210
Form and manner of reports.
All reports specified in § 144.206
must be submitted in the form and
manner specified by the Secretary in
insurer reporting instructions.
§ 144.212
Confidentiality of information.
Data collected and reported under the
requirements of this subpart are subject
to the confidentiality of information
requirements specified in regulations
under 42 CFR part 401, subpart B, and
45 CFR part 5, subpart F.
§ 144.214 Notifications of noncompliance
with reporting requirements.
If an insurer of a qualified long-term
care insurance policy does not submit
the required reports by the due dates
specified in this subpart, the Secretary
notifies the appropriate State insurance
commissioner within 45 days after the
deadline for submission of the
information and data specified in
§ 144.208.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.778, Medical Assistance
Program)
Dated: February 12, 2008.
Ben Sasse,
Assistant Secretary for Planning and
Evaluation.
Dated: February 12, 2008.
Michael O. Leavitt,
Secretary.
Editorial Note: The Office of the Federal
Register received this document on May 20,
2008.]
[FR Doc. E8–11559 Filed 5–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 665
RIN 0648–AV30
Fisheries in the Western Pacific;
Precious Corals Fisheries; Black Coral
Quota and Gold Coral Moratorium
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability of fishery
management plan amendment; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS announces that the
Western Pacific Fishery Management
Council proposes to amend the Fishery
Management Plan for the Precious
Corals Fisheries of the Western Pacific
Region (Amendment 7). If approved by
the Secretary of Commerce, Amendment
7 would designate the Au’au Channel,
Hawaii, black coral bed as an
‘‘Established Bed’’ with a harvest quota
of 5,000 kg every two years that applies
to Federal and State of Hawaii waters,
and establish a 5–year moratorium on
the harvest of gold coral throughout the
U.S. western Pacific. The proposed
amendment is intended to prevent
overfishing and achieve optimum yield
of precious coral resources.
DATES: Comments on Amendment 7,
which includes an environmental
assessment, must be received by July 22,
2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the
amendment, identified by 0648–AV30,
may be sent to either of the following
addresses:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal
www.regulations.gov; or
• Mail: William L. Robinson,
Regional Administrator, NMFS, Pacific
Islands Region (PIR), 1601 Kapiolani
Blvd., Suite 1110, Honolulu, HI 96814–
4700.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information
(e.g., name, address, etc.) submitted
voluntarily by the commenter may be
publicly accessible. Do not submit
Confidential Business Information, or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments. Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
E:\FR\FM\23MYP1.SGM
23MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 101 (Friday, May 23, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30030-30038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-11559]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Office of the Secretary
45 CFR Part 144
[ASPELTCI]
RIN 0991-AB44
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation;
State Long-Term Care Partnership Program: Reporting Requirements for
Insurers
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation
(OASPE), HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule sets forth proposed reporting requirements
for private insurers that issue qualified long-term care insurance
policies in States participating in the State Long-Term Care
Partnership Program established under the Deficit Reduction Act (DRA)
of 2005. Section 6021 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 requires
that the Secretary specify a set of reporting requirements and collect
data from insurers on qualifying long-term care insurance policies
issued under the program and the subsequent use of the benefits under
these policies. Under a State Long-Term Care Partnership Program, an
amount equal to the benefits received under of the long-term care
insurance policy is disregarded in determining the assets of an
individual for purposes of Medicaid eligibility and estate recovery.
[[Page 30031]]
DATES: To be assured consideration, comments must be received at the
address provided below, no later than 5 p.m. on July 22, 2008.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer to file code ASPE:LTCI. Because
of staff and resource limitations, we cannot accept comments by
facsimile (FAX) transmission.
You may submit comments in one of four ways (no duplicates,
please):
1. Electronically. You may submit electronic comments on specific
issues in this regulation to https://www.Regulations.gov. Click on the
link ``Comment or Submission'' and enter the keyword ``ASPE:LTCI''.
(Attachments should be in Microsoft Word, WordPerfect, or Excel;
however, we prefer Microsoft Word.)
2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments (one original and
two copies) to the following address only: Office of Disability, Aging,
and Long-Term Care, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and
Evaluation, Department of Health and Human Services, Attention:
ASPE:LTCI, Hunter McKay, 200 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 424-E,
Washington, DC 20201.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received
before the close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments (one
original and two copies) to the following address only: Office of
Disability, Aging, and Long-Term Care, Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Department of Health and Human
Services, Attention: ASPE:LTCI, Hunter McKay, 200 Independence Avenue,
SW., Room 424-E, Washington, DC 20201.
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer, you may deliver (by hand or
courier) your written comments (one original and two copies) before the
close of the comment period to the following address: Room 424-E,
Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington,
DC 20201.
(Because access to the interior of the Hubert H. Humphrey Building
is not readily available to persons without Federal Government
identification, commenters are encouraged to leave their comments in
the mail drop slots located in the main lobby of the building. A stamp-
in clock is available for persons wishing to retain proof of filing by
stamping in and retaining an extra copy of the comments being filed.)
Comments mailed to the addresses indicated as appropriate for hand
or courier delivery may be delayed and received after the comment
period.
Submission of comments on paperwork requirements. You may submit
comments on this document's paperwork requirements by mailing your
comments to the addresses provided at the end of the ``Collection of
Information Requirements'' section in this document.
Submitting Comments: We welcome comments from the public on all
issues set forth in this proposed rule to assist us in fully
considering issues and developing policies. You can assist us by
referencing the file code ASPE:LTCI and the specific ``issue
identifier'' that precedes the section on which you choose to comment.
Inspection of Public Comments: All comments received before the
close of the comment period are available for viewing by the public,
including any personally identifiable or confidential business
information that is included in a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have been received: https://
www.Regulations.gov. Click on the link ``Comment or Submission'' on
that Web site to view public comments.
Comments received timely will also be available for public
inspection as they are received, generally beginning approximately 3
weeks after publication of a document, at the headquarters of the
Department of Health and Human Services, 200 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20201, Monday through Friday of each week from 8:30 a.m.
to 4 p.m. To schedule an appointment to view public comments, phone 1-
800-XXX-XXXX.
Electronic Access
This Federal Register document is also available from the Federal
Register online database through GPO Access, a service of the U.S.
Government Printing Office. Free public access is available on a Wide
Area Information Server (WAIS) through the Internet and via
asynchronous dial-in. Internet users can access the database by using
the World Wide Web; the Superintendent of Documents' home page address
is https://www.gpoaccess.gov/, by using local WAIS client software, or
by telnet to swais.access.gpo.gov, then login as guest (no password
required). Dial-in users should use communications software and modem
to call (202) 512-1661; type swais, then login as guest (no password
required).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hunter McKay, (202) 205-8999.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Scope of This Proposed Rule
This proposed rule describes the reporting requirements that we are
proposing to require of all insurers that issue qualified long-term
care insurance policies under the State Long-Term Care Partnership
Program. In addition to publishing these regulations, The Department
anticipates taking other actions to further the implementation of the
Partnership for Long Term Care. One such action is publication in the
near future of a Federal Register Notice containing Partnership State
Reciprocity Standards. This standard outlines an agreement whereby
states can provide Medicaid asset disregards for Partnership policies
purchased in other states.
II. Background
(If you choose to comment on issues in this section, please include
the caption ``History of Partnership Programs'' at the beginning of
your comment.)
A. Historical Overview of State Long-Term Care Partnership Programs
1. Initial Development of Programs
In the late 1980's, a number of State Medicaid programs began to
work with private insurance companies to create a bridge between
Medicaid and insurance for long-term care. The goal of these
collaborations was to create private insurance policies that were more
affordable and provide better financial protection to consumers against
large liabilities for long-term care costs than the policies generally
available at that time. The result of these collaborations was the
establishment of State Long-Term Care Partnership Programs that
provided for expanded access to Medicaid by allowing applicants who use
long-term care insurance policies to have higher assets and still be
eligible for Medicaid. The additional amount of assets that an
individual is allowed to have is equivalent to the amount paid by the
insurance policy on his or her behalf. These State partnerships
provided an incentive for insurers to offer affordable, high quality
benefits and for consumers to protect themselves against the high cost
of long-term care through the purchase of insurance policies that can
be used in conjunction with benefits provided under Medicaid.
Four States (California, Connecticut, Indiana, and New York)
initially implemented Partnership Programs in 1993. As part of the
implementation process, each State outlined a set of data reporting
requirements for participating insurers. The data that were to be
collected were intended to allow each
[[Page 30032]]
State to monitor program activities and evaluate the impact of the
Partnership Program on Medicaid long-term care expenditures. The
insurers who participated in these partnerships recommended, as part of
the design of the data collection requirements, that the participating
States use a unified set of reporting requirements to streamline the
reporting burden on the participating insurers. The participating
insurers believed that if each State designed its own reporting
requirements, the administrative costs for the program would be
prohibitive. The four States agreed with the participating insurers and
adopted a uniform set of reporting criteria.
The four initial States launched their Partnership Programs using
existing State authority through amendments to their State Medicaid
plans. Each State requested a change in the treatment of assets in the
Medicaid financial eligibility test. No other Federal authority was
necessary at that time to operate the programs.
2. Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1993
The Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1993 (OBRA 1993), Public Law 103-
66, contained language that changed the conditions under which Medicaid
State plan amendments relating to asset disregards for private long-
term care insurance could be approved. OBRA 1993 allowed California,
Connecticut, Indiana, and New York, as well as Iowa and Massachusetts,
to continue their initial Long-Term Care Partnership Programs. However,
OBRA 1993 specified a set of requirements for any additional States
that chose to operate a Partnership Program. Any State, other than the
initial four partnership States, that sought a Medicaid State plan
amendment on or after May 14, 1993 was required to abide by the
following additional conditions:
a. Estate Recovery
States establishing Long-Term Care Partnership Programs on or after
May 14, 1993, were required to recover from the estates of Medicaid
recipients in States with partnership agreements expenses incurred for
the provision of long-term health care under Medicaid. Assets that were
disregarded in the initial financial eligibility process were also
exempt from estate recovery in the initial four States with Partnership
Programs. States establishing new Partnership Programs were only
allowed to disregard assets in the initial eligibility process but not
in the estate recovery process. After a Medicaid recipient who had a
long-term care insurance policy issued under a State Long-Term
Partnership Program died, the State was required to recover an amount
equivalent to what Medicaid spent on his or her behalf from the
deceased recipient's estate, including any protected assets under the
State Long-Term Care Partnership Program.
b. No Waiver of Estate Recovery
States establishing Long-Term Care Partnership Programs on or after
May 14, 1993, were precluded from waiving the estate recovery
requirement for Medicaid recipients who had obtained long-term care
insurance policies under a State Long-Term Care Partnership Program.
c. Expanded Definition of Estate
States establishing Long-Term Care Partnership Program on or after
May 14, 1993, were also required to use a specific definition of
``estate'' for recovery purposes when recovery of Medicaid expenditures
was against the estates of Medicaid recipients who had obtained long-
term care insurance policies issued under a State Long-Term Care
Partnership Program. This definition was more expansive than the
definition that was generally used by States.
While OBRA 1993 did not forbid additional States from attempting to
establish new Long-Term Care Partnership Programs under the new
conditions, the impact was essentially the same as a ban. A few States
tried unsuccessfully to launch partnership programs under the new
conditions. Other interested States passed enabling legislation with
contingency language that allowed the State to proceed if the OBRA 1993
partnership provisions were repealed. No subsequent Federal legislation
related to Long-Term Care Partnership Programs was enacted until Public
Law 109-171 (the DRA of 2005). As discussed in detail under section
II.A.3. of this proposed rule, the DRA of 2005 included provisions that
allow States to offer specific asset disregards for Medicaid
eligibility purposes under a new set of conditions.
3. Deficit Reduction Act (DRA) of 2005
Section 6021(a)(1) of the DRA of 2005 amended section
1917(b)(1)(C)(i) and added new sections 1917(b)(1)(C)(iii) through (vi)
to the Act that provide for an expansion of State long-term care
insurance partnerships through a new set of conditions. Under this
provision, States may establish qualified State long-term care
insurance partnerships, defined in the Act as an approved Medicaid
State plan amendment under Title XIX of the Act that provides for the
disregard of any assets or resources in an amount equal to the
insurance benefit payments that are made to or on behalf of an
individual who is a beneficiary under a long-term care insurance policy
if certain requirements specified in sections 1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(I)
through (VII) of the Act are met. In other words, States establishing
Partnership Programs must offer a dollar of asset disregard for every
dollar paid out under a long-term care insurance policy issued under a
State Long-Term Care Partnership Program.
Section 1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(II) of the Act provides that the
insurance policy must be a qualified long-term care insurance policy as
defined in section 7702B(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, that
is issued not earlier than the effective date of the State plan
amendment. (If an individual has an existing long-term care insurance
policy that does not qualify as a qualified partnership policy due to
the issue date of the policy, and that policy is exchanged for another
policy, the State insurance commissioner or other State authority must
determine the issue date for the policy that is received in exchange.
Under this provision, a long-term care insurance policy includes a
certificate issued under a group insurance contract.)
Among other requirements specified in the statute for qualified
long-term care insurance partnerships--
The long-term care insurance policy must (1) be issued to
an insured individual who is a resident of the State in which coverage
first became effective under the policy (sections 1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(I)
of the Act); (2) be certified by the State insurance commissioner or
other appropriate authority that the policy meets specific provisions
of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) October
2000 Model Regulation and Model Act (sections 1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(III)
and 1917(b)(5)(B) of the Act); and (3) include certain protections
against inflation on an annual basis (section 1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(IV) of
the Act).
The State Medicaid agency must provide information and
technical assistance to the State insurance department on the insurance
department's role of assuring that any individual who sells a long-term
care insurance policy under the partnership receives training and
demonstrates evidence of an understanding of such policies and how they
relate to other public and private coverage of long-term care (section
1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(V) of the Act).
Issuers of long-term care insurance policies under a State
qualified long-
[[Page 30033]]
term care insurance partnership must provide regular reports to the
Secretary, in accordance with regulations of the Secretary, that
include notification regarding when benefits provided under the policy
have been paid and the amount of such benefits paid, notification
regarding when the policy otherwise terminates, and such other
information as the Secretary determines may be appropriate to the
administration of State long-term care insurance partnerships (section
1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(VI) of the Act). Section 1917(b)(1)(C)(v) of the Act
provides that the regulations required under section
1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(VI) of the Act shall be promulgated after
consultation with the NAIC, issuers of long-term care insurance
policies, States with experience with long-term care insurance
partnership plans, other States, and representatives of consumers of
long-term care insurance policies, and shall specify the type and
format of the data to be reported and the frequency with which such
reports are to be made. In addition, the Secretary, as appropriate,
shall provide copies of the reports provided in accordance with that
clause to the State involved.
The State may not impose any requirement affecting the
terms of benefits of a policy under the partnership program unless the
State imposes such requirement on long-term care insurance policies
without regard to whether the policy is covered under the partnership
or is offered in connection with such a partnership (section
1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(VII) of the Act).
Section 1917(b)(1)(C)(iv) of the Act provides that a State that had
a State plan amendment approved as of May 14, 1993, satisfies the
requirements of the statute under clause (II) and may continue as a
qualified partnership program if the Secretary determines that the
State plan amendment provides for consumer protection standards that
are no less stringent than the consumer protection standards that
applied under such a State plan amendment as of December 31, 2005.
B. Implementing Regulations
Currently, there are no Federal regulations directly related to
State operation of State Long-Term Care Partnership Programs. In areas
in which the program coordinates benefits with Medicaid coverage of
long-term care, the existing Medicaid regulations at 42 CFR Chapter IV,
Subchapter C, are applicable. In 2006, States were provided with
guidance on the implementation of State Long-Term Care Partnership
Programs under the DRA of 2005.
To implement section 1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(VI) and 1917(b)(1)(C)(iv)
of the Act, as directed by the statute, we are proposing to set forth
in regulations the requirements for reporting information and data on
qualified long-term care insurance policies issued under State Long-
Term Care Partnership Programs under an approved State plan amendment.
C. States Currently Operating Long-Term Care Partnership Programs
California, Connecticut, Indiana, Iowa, Massachusetts, and New York
had approved State Long-Term Partnership Programs under an approved
State plan amendment as of May 14, 1993. They were ``grandfathered'' as
satisfying the statutorily imposed requirements when pursuant to
section 1917(b)(1)(C)(iv) of the Act, the Secretary determined that the
State plan amendments of these States provide protection no less
stringent than that applied under their State plan amendments as of
December 31, 2005.
As of December 2007, seven other States offer State Long-Term Care
Partnership policies for sale under the DRA provisions: Florida, Idaho,
Kansas, Minnesota, Nebraska, South Dakota, and Virginia. Nine States
have approved State plan amendments for qualified State Long-Term Care
Partnership Programs although policies had not yet been issued pursuant
to those programs: Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Minnesota,
Missouri, North Dakota, Nevada, Ohio, and Oregon. Four States have
submitted State plan amendments for which approval is pending: Arizona,
New Hampshire, Oklahoma, and Pennsylvania. Ten other States are in the
process of developing Partnership Programs: Illinois, Maine, Maryland,
Michigan, Montana, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Texas, Vermont, and
Wisconsin.
III. Provisions of This Proposed Rule
A. Legislative Authority
As stated earlier, the DRA of 2005 requires insurers participating
in State Long-Term Care Partnership Programs to provide regular reports
to the Secretary in a manner in accordance with regulations of the
Secretary. The reports must include notification regarding when
benefits provided under the policy have been paid and the amount of the
benefits paid, notification regarding when the policy otherwise
terminates, and any other information as the Secretary determines may
be appropriate to the administration of State long-term care insurance
partnerships. Section 1917(b)(1)(C )(iv) of the Act provides that the
regulations required under section 1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(VI) must be
promulgated after consultation with the NAIC, issuers of long-term care
insurance policies, States with experience with long-term care
insurance partnership plans, other States, and representatives of
consumers of long-term care insurance policies, and must specify the
type and format of the data to be reported and the frequency with which
the reports are to be made. In addition, the Secretary, as appropriate,
must provide copies of the reports provided in accordance with that
clause to the State involved.
B. Collaboration With States, Insurers, Insurance Regulators, and
Consumers in the Development of Reporting Requirements
(If you choose to comment on issues in this section, please include
the caption ``Consultations with Stakeholders'' at the beginning of
your comment.)
In accordance with section 1917(b)(1)(C)(iv) of the Act, as added
by the DRA of 2005, we have consulted with numerous stakeholders in the
development of the reporting requirements presented in this proposed
rule. In addition to one-on-one consultations with stakeholders
representing States, insurers, consumers, and regulators, we have
established a Technical Expert Panel to provide a forum for the
exchange of ideas, perspectives, and expertise regarding the
specification of individual data items. The Technical Expert Panel
consists of approximately 25 members representing insurers, States,
consumer organizations, the NAIC, the Federal Government, and the
policy research community. The panel members were selected in January
2007, from responses to invitations sent by HHS along with an initial
draft of the reporting requirements. We held numerous meetings and
teleconferences with the panel members to discuss and further develop
the draft reporting requirements and to obtain further input on
partnership implementation. The reporting requirements presented in
this proposed rule represent the product of this ongoing stakeholder
input process. We plan to work on an ongoing basis with the Technical
Expert Panel.
C. Specific Proposed Reporting Requirements
(If you choose to comment on issues in this section, please include
the caption ``Types of Data to be Reported'' at the beginning of your
comment.)
[[Page 30034]]
In consultation with stakeholders and the Technical Expert Panel,
we have developed proposed requirements for insurers for reporting data
under the State Long-Term Care Partnership Program under two
categories: (1) Registry data; and (2) claims data. These two
categories would require the submission of data in four distinct file
types. Generally, participating long-term care insurers would report
under only two of these files. For all four file types, we are
proposing to require insurers to report on only those insured
individuals, policyholders, and claimants who have active qualified
long-term care insurance partnership policies or certificates. The
proposed reporting requirements would not apply to insurance policies
or certificates that are not partnership qualified.
Insurer reporting specifications would be detailed in an HHS
document entitled ``State Long-Term Care Partnership Insurer Reporting
Requirements'' which we expect will be available from https://
aspe.hhs.gov/daltcp/reports/2008/PartRepReq.pdf no later than June 1,
2008. We are in the process of developing an integrated database
through which insurers would submit these data. We are proposing that
data would be submitted through a secure Web site that meets all
current Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
requirements for security of personal health information.
1. Registry Data
We are proposing to require insurers to report data, on a
semiannual basis, on all insured individuals who have been issued
qualified long-term care insurance policies or certificates under
qualified State Long-Term Care Partnership Programs; that is, for the
6-month reporting periods of January 1 through June 30 and July 1
through December 31 of each year. The reports must include data on
qualified long-term care insurance partnership policies sold on either
an individual basis or a group basis, as long as individual-level data
are available to the insurer. These data include, but are not limited
to, the following:
Current identifying information on each insured
individual.
The name of the insurance company and the issuing State.
The effective date and terms of coverage under the policy.
The coverage period and benefits.
The annual premium.
Other information as specified by the Secretary in ``State
Long-Term Care Insurance Partnership Insurer Reporting Instructions.''
2. Claims Data
We are proposing to require insurers to report data, for each
quarter of the calendar year, on all benefit claims paid for all
insured individuals who have been issued qualified long-term care
insurance policies or certificates (individual policies or under group
coverage plans) under qualified State Long-Term Care Partnership
Programs. These data include, but are not limited to, the following:
Current identifying information on the insured individual.
The type and cash amount of the benefits paid during the
reporting period and lifetime to date.
Remaining lifetime benefits.
Other information as specified by the Secretary in ``State
Long-Term Care Insurance Partnership Insurer Reporting Instructions.''
3. Frequency of Reports and Deadlines for Submission
(If you choose to comment on issues in this section, please include
the caption ``Frequency and Deadlines for Reports'' at the beginning of
your comment.)
We are proposing to require insurers to submit data for different
reporting periods, depending upon the file type.
We are proposing to require insurers to submit the required
registry data to the Secretary on a semiannual basis; that is, for the
6-month reporting period of January 1 through June 30 and July 1
through December 31 of each year. The proposed deadline for submittal
of registry data reports is 30 days after the end of the reporting
period.
4. Transition Provision
For insurers who have issued or exchanged a qualified Partnership
policy prior to the effective date of the final regulations we issue,
we are proposing a transition provision. We are proposing that the
first reports required for these insurers will be the reports that
pertain to the reporting period that begins no more than 120 days after
the effective date of the final regulations.
5. Format and Manner of Reporting Data
(If you choose to comment on issues in this section, please include
the caption ``Format for Reports'' at the beginning of your comment.)
We are proposing to require that insurers submit the required data
in the format and manner specified by the Secretary in the HHS-issued
insurer reporting specifications document, ``State Long-Term Care
Insurance Partnership Insurer Reporting Instructions.'' As we mentioned
earlier, we are in the process of developing an integrated database
that would be accessible through a secure Web site, and we plan to
issue instructions as to how insurers would access and input the
required data into the HHS reporting system.
6. Use of Submitted Reports
(If you choose to comment on issues in this section, please include
the caption ``Use of Reports'' at the beginning of your comment.)
The overall purpose of the data is twofold, first to be used in
efforts to monitor program performance at both the state and federal
level, and second to provide data for a longer-term evaluation of the
effectiveness of the Partnership program. HHS and the States
participating in the State Long-Term Care Partnership Program would use
the information provided by insurers in compliance with the proposed
reporting requirements for analytical studies and for program
monitoring. The data provided by each insurer would reflect the
combined experience of all State Long-Term Care Partnership Programs in
terms of policies sold and benefits used. We plan to use the data to
produce reports for Congress and other interested stakeholders on the
implementation of the State Long-Term Care Partnership Program. In
addition, we plan to use the data to generate individual State-level
reports that would be used by the States to track the implementation of
the Partnership Program at the State level.
HHS does not intend to use the data to determine asset disregard
levels for individuals who participate in the State Long-Term Care
Partnership Program and eventually apply for Medicaid coverage. We
would not collect data on ``point in time'' information regarding the
amount of insurance benefits used by claimants, nor exact information
on when private insurance benefits may be exhausted, which clearly
would depend upon how claimants use benefits to purchase long-term care
services. The computation of asset disregard levels and the
determination of Medicaid eligibility coverage are matters that will be
dealt with among the insurer, the insured individual, and the State
Medicaid eligibility office. We expect that when insured individuals
exhaust their insurance coverage (or otherwise become eligible for
Medicaid prior to the exhaustion of benefits), insurers will provide
them with documentation of their participation in the State Long-Term
Care Partnership Program and of the amount of benefits that the insured
received. This documentation will become part of the entire
documentation provided by the insured individual at
[[Page 30035]]
the time he or she applies for Medicaid. The Medicaid eligibility
office will then determine, based upon the documentation provided by
the applicant, the asset disregard level that will be applied.
It is possible that State Medicaid programs may wish to access the
collected data for monitoring purposes, to help them anticipate the
number of insured individuals who may become eligible for Medicaid
asset disregards over a projected time period. For example, through
reports provided to each State from the integrated database, States
would know how many partnership policyholders are ``in claim'' during
any 3-month reporting period. States would also know, approximately, to
what extent policyholders who are in claim have utilized the insurance
benefits for which they are eligible and the amount of benefits
remaining under their policy maximums. However, once an insured
individual exhausts his or her insurance benefits under the policy, his
or her eligibility for Medicaid would still depend upon the amount of
available assets he or she retains, relative to his or her asset
disregard, as well as other Medicaid eligibility criteria. For example,
an insured individual may be eligible for an asset disregard of
$150,000, but still retains $250,000 in countable assets. In this case,
he or she would have to spend down $100,000 of his or her available
assets before applying for Medicaid coverage. Thus, in general terms,
States would be able to use the data to project future applications for
Medicaid (and their potential budgetary impacts) but, at the individual
level, the specific financial circumstances of each insured individual
would determine his or her eligibility for Medicaid coverage.
D. Additional State-Mandated Reporting Requirements
(If you choose to comment on issues in this section, please include
the caption ``Additional State Reporting'' at the beginning of your
comment.)
The DRA explicitly states that there is nothing in the statute that
prohibits States from imposing additional reporting requirements on
insurers participating in the Long-Term Care Partnership Program,
beyond the Federal reporting requirements that we are proposing in this
proposed rule. However, we believe that the information that would be
made available to the Secretary and to the States participating in the
Long-Term Care Partnership Program through these proposed mandated
reporting requirements would be sufficient to meet the policy analysis
and program monitoring needs of the States. We, as well as the
stakeholders participating in the development of these proposed
reporting requirements, attempted to achieve a proper balance between
the legitimate needs of the Federal Government and State governments to
monitor the implementation and operation of the State Long-Term Care
Partnership Program, and the desire not to impose undue cost burdens on
participating insurers, to the point where they may consider it not
economically beneficial to participate in the Partnership Program.
E. Confidentiality of Information
(If you choose to comment on issues in this section, please include
the caption ``Confidentiality'' at the beginning of your comment.)
We are proposing to provide in the regulations that the data
collected and reported under the requirements of the regulations in
this proposed rule would be subject to the confidentiality of
information requirements specified in regulations under 42 CFR Part
401, Subpart B, and 45 CFR Part 5, Subpart F and any other applicable
confidentiality statute or regulation.
F. Provision of Reports to Partnership States
(If you choose to comment on issues in this section, please include
the caption ``Furnishing Reports to States'' at the beginning of your
comment.)
Section 1917(b)(1)(C)(v) of the Act provides that the Secretary, as
appropriate, must provide copies of the reports provided by insurers to
the State involved. We plan to make reports containing the reported
data available to States in a timely and efficient manner.
G. Incorporation of Reporting Requirements in the Code of Federal
Regulations
(If you choose to comment on issues in this section, please include
the caption ``Regulation Text'' at the beginning of your comment.)
We are proposing to establish under Title 45, Subtitle A,
Subchapter B, Part 144 of the Code of Federal Regulations a new Subpart
B to incorporate the requirements for the reporting of data by insurers
on qualified long-term care insurance policies issued under State Long-
Term Care Partnership Programs that are established under an approved
Medicaid State plan amendment.
Specifically--
Proposed Sec. 144.200 contains the basis for the regulations.
Proposed Sec. 144.202 includes definitions used throughout the
subpart.
Proposed Sec. 144.204 specifies the applicability of the
regulations under the subpart.
Proposed Sec. 144.206 specifies the requirements for reporting of
long-term care partnership program data and the frequency with which
insurers must report the data.
Proposed Sec. 144.208 specifies the deadlines for submission of
reports.
Proposed Sec. 144.210 specifies the format and manner in which the
data are to be reported.
Proposed Sec. 144.212 specifies the confidentiality of information
requirements that will be applied.
Proposed Sec. 144.214 specifies the action that the Secretary will
take if an insurer fails to report the required data by the specified
deadlines.
IV. Response to Public Comments
Because of the large number of public comments that we normally
receive on Federal Register documents, we are not able to acknowledge
or respond to them individually. We will consider all comments we
receive by the date and time specified in the DATES section of the
preamble of this proposed rule, and, when we proceed with a subsequent
document, we will respond to the comments in the preamble to that
document.
V. Collection of Information Requirements
The Department of Health and Human Services has determined that
this notice of proposed rulemaking contains information collections
that are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
In compliance with the requirement of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA,
the Office of the Secretary (OS), Department of Health and Human
Services, is publishing the following summary of a proposed information
collection request for public comment. Further, the Department
acknowledges that this regulation is covered under the Privacy Act and
that this collection of data constitutes a System of Records. The
Department anticipates publishing a System of Records Notice.
Interested persons are invited to send comments regarding this burden
estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,
including any of the following subjects: (1) The necessity and utility
of the proposed information collection for the proper performance of
the agency's functions; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (4) the use of automated collection
[[Page 30036]]
techniques or other forms of information technology to minimize the
information collection burden.
To obtain copies of the supporting statement and any related forms
for the proposed paperwork collections described below, e-mail your
request, including your name, address, phone number, as well as the
caption ``Collection of Information Requirements'' at the beginning of
your comment, to Sherette.funncoleman@hhs.gov, or call the Reports
Clearance Office on (202) 690-6162. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed information collections must be
received with 60 days.
Title: Partnership for Long-Term Care Insurer Reporting
Requirements.
Description: This information collected under the proposed rule is
intended for insurers participating in the Partnership for Long-Term
Care as authorized by the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005. Insurers will
provide data in the proscribed format to the Department on Partnership
certified long-term care insurance policies. The requirements include
the identity of the policy holder, the type of coverage purchased and
the amount of insurance benefits used. Data from this submission will
be provided to state Medicaid agencies to assist in determining the
amount of asset protection earned by program participants.
It is estimated that insurers participating in the Partnership will
be able to provide the necessary reports from data currently within
their insurance operations systems. Fulfilling the reporting
requirements will require that they write programs to extract the data
in the manner specified by the Department. There are no costs to the
respondents, other than their time.
Estimated Annualized Burden Hours and Burden Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average
Number of Number of response per Total burden
CFR section Type of respondent respondents responses per respondent (in hours
respondents hours)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
45 CFR 144.206.................................. Insurers.......................... 30 6 45/60 135
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public comments addressed as a result of this notice will be taken
into account in the formal OMB request for clearance for this data
collection. Prior to the effective date of this final rule, HHS will
publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing OMB's decision to
approve, modify, or disapprove the new information collection
provisions in the final rule. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
VI. Regulatory Impact Analysis
(If you choose to comment on issues in this section, please include
the caption ``Impact'' at the beginning of your comment.)
A. Overall Impact
We have examined the impacts of this proposed rule as required by
Executive Order 12866 (September 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review)
and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (September 19, 1980, Pub. L.
96-354), section 1102(b) of the Social Security Act, the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4), and Executive Order 13132.
B. Executive Order 12866
Executive Order 12866 (as amended by Executive Order 13258, which
merely reassigns responsibility of duties) directs agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). A
regulatory impact analysis (RIA) must be prepared for major rules with
economically significant effects ($100 million or more in any 1 year).
While we have determined that this proposed rule is not
economically significant, it is however a significant regulatory
action. We estimate that the aggregate cost to participating private
insurers of implementing the reporting requirements in this proposed
rule would be approximately $1,500,000.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
The RFA requires agencies to analyze options for regulatory relief
of small businesses. For purposes of the RFA, small entities include
small businesses, nonprofit organizations, and government agencies.
Most insurance companies are not considered to be small entities
because they generally have revenues of more than $29 million in any 1
year. (For details, see the Small Business Administration's final rule
that sets forth size standards for industries at 65 FR 69432, November
17, 2000.) For purposes of the RFA, all insurance companies are not
considered to be small entities. Individuals and States are not
included in the definition of a small entity. However, we are
soliciting comments on our estimates and analysis of the impact of this
proposed rule on insurers.
There are approximately 100 insurance companies located nationwide
that issue long-term care insurance policies. We expect that, of these
100 companies, approximately 30 insurance companies will participate in
qualified State Long-Term Care Partnership Programs. Currently, there
are 15 to 20 companies operating in States that are selling or have
issued qualified long-term care insurance policies under the State
Long-Term Care Partnership Programs. As of December 2007, approximately
300,000 policies have been sold. We believe this represents
approximately 80 percent of the policies that might be sold when the
Partnership Programs are established nationwide. We anticipate that the
number of insurance companies selling qualified long-term care
insurance partnership policies might increase by about 10 as more
States obtain approved State plan amendments to operate State Long-Term
Care Partnership Programs.
As we stated earlier, insurers participating in the original four
Partnership Programs have been reporting data on policies sold and
benefits used in the program for more than a decade. The proposed
reporting requirements in this proposed rule were designed to take
advantage of data already available in insurer data sets. Insurers
would not be asked to collect new data, but simply to recode existing
data into a common format for submission to the Secretary. It is
estimated that participating insurers would have to make a one-time
investment to produce the computer programs necessary to compile the
reports. Should the reporting requirement change in the future there
will also be a cost to make the necessary changes. We are estimating
that the
[[Page 30037]]
programming would require 400 hours of labor on average (this number
will vary widely by company depending the type of systems used) to
create the necessary changes. We also estimate an average cost per hour
of programming time of $125. The cost per company is estimated at
$50,000 and the total estimate for all companies is estimated at $1.5
million.
Subsequently, there would be a much smaller investment to run the
quarterly and semi-annually reports. The data submissions were designed
to be primarily snapshots of data elements in the insurers' files with
very little tabulation or summary reporting. We note that all of the
currently participating insurers participated in the development of the
proposed reporting requirements in this proposed rule and have given
their consensus to the proposed requirements.
D. Small Rural Hospitals
In addition, section 1102(b) of the Act requires us to prepare a
regulatory impact analysis for any proposed rule (and subsequent final
rule) that may have a significant impact on the operations of a
substantial number of small rural hospitals. This analysis must conform
to the provisions of section 603 of the RFA. This proposed rule does
not affect small rural hospitals.
E. Unfunded Mandates
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104-4) also requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule whose mandates require spending in any
1 year of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for inflation.
That threshold level is currently approximately $120 million. This
proposed rule would not mandate any requirements for State, local, or
tribal governments. However, it would affect private sector costs to
insurance companies who sell qualified long-term care insurance
partnership policies. We note that participation by insurers in the
Partnership Program is voluntary. We have also determined that the
costs of reporting the required data are not significant.
F. Federalism
Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an
agency must meet when it promulgates a proposed rule (and subsequent
final rule) that imposes substantial direct requirement costs on State
and local governments, preempts State law, or otherwise has Federalism
implications. As stated above, this proposed rule would not have a
substantial effect on State and local governments.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 144
Health care, Health insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping.
For the reasons stated in the preamble of this proposed rule, we
are proposing to amend 45 CFR subtitle A, subchapter B, part 144 as set
forth below:
Subchapter B--Requirements Relating to Health Care Access
PART 144--REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE
1. The authority citation for part 144 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: Secs. 2701 through 2763, 2791, and 2792 of the Public
Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg through 300gg-63, 300gg-91,
300gg-92 as amended by HIPAA (Pub. L. 104-191, 110 Stat. 1936), MHPA
(Pub. L. 104-204, 110 Stat. 2944, as amended by Pub. L. 107-116, 115
Stat. 2177), NMHPA (Pub. L. 104-204, 110 Stat. 2935), WHCRA (Pub. L.
105-227, 112 Stat. 2681-436)) and section 103(c)(4) of HIPAA; and
secs. 1102 and 1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(VI) of the Social Security Act (42
U.S.C. 1302 and 1396p(b)(1)(C)(iii)(VI)).
2. A new subpart B is added to read as follows:
Subpart B--Qualified State Long-Term Care Insurance Partnerships:
Reporting Requirements for Insurers
Sec.
144.200 Basis.
144.202 Definitions.
144.204 Applicability of regulations.
144.206 Reporting requirements.
144.208 Deadlines for submission of reports.
144.210 Form and manner of reports.
144.212 Confidentiality of information.
144.214 Actions for noncompliance with reporting requirements.
Subpart B--Qualified State Long-Term Care Insurance Partnerships:
Reporting Requirements for Insurers
Sec. 144.200 Basis.
This subpart implements--
(a) Section 1917(b)(1)(C) (iii)(VI) of the Social Security Act,
(Act) which requires the issuer of a long-term care insurance policy
issued under a qualified State long-term care insurance partnership to
provide specified regular reports to the Secretary. (b) Section
1917(b)(1)(C)(v) of the Act, which specifies that the regulations of
the Secretary under section 1917(b)(1)(C) (iii)(VI) of the Act shall be
promulgated after consultation with the National Association of
Insurance Commissioners, issuers of long-term care insurance policies,
States with experience with long-term care insurance partnership plans,
other States, and representative of consumers of long-term care
insurance policies, and shall specify the type and format of the data
to be reported and the frequency with which such reports are to be
made. This section of the statute also provides that the Secretary
provide copies of the reports to the States involved.
Sec. 144.202 Definitions.
As used in this subpart--
Partnership qualified policy refers to a qualified long-term
insurance policy issued under a qualified State long-term care
insurance partnership.
Qualified long-term insurance care policy means an insurance policy
that has been determined by a state insurance commissioner to meet the
requirements of sections 1917(b)(1)(C)(iii)(I) through (IV) and
1917(b)(5) of the Act. It includes a certificate issued under a group
insurance contract.
Qualified State long-term care insurance partnership means an
approved Medicaid State plan amendment that provides for the disregard
of any assets or resources in an amount equal to the insurance benefit
payments that are made to or on behalf of an individual who is a
beneficiary under a long-term care insurance policy that has been
determined by a state insurance commissioner to meet the requirements
of section 1917(b)(a)(C)(iii) of the Act. It includes any Medicaid
State plan amendment approved as of May 4, 1993, that meets the
requirements of section 1917(b)(1)(C)(iii) of the Act and for which the
Secretary determines that the State plan amendment provides for
consumer protection standards that are no less stringent than the
consumer protection standards that applied under the State plan
amendment as of December 31, 2005.
Sec. 144.204 Applicability of regulations.
The regulations contained in this subpart for reporting data apply
only to those insurers that have issued qualified long-term care
insurance policies to individuals under a qualified State long-term
care insurance partnership.
Sec. 144.206 Reporting requirements.
(a) General requirement. Any insurer that sells a qualified long-
term care insurance policy under a qualified State long-term care
insurance partnership must submit, in accordance with the requirements
of this section, data on insured individuals, policyholders, and
claimants who have active partnership
[[Page 30038]]
qualified policies or certificates for a reporting period.
(b) Specific requirements. Insurers of qualified long-term care
insurance policies must submit the following data to the Secretary by
the deadlines specified in paragraph (c) of this section:
(1) Registry of active individual and group partnership qualified
policies or certificates. (i) Insurers must submit data on--
(A) Any insured individual who held an active partnership qualified
policy or certificate at any point during a reporting period, even if
the policy or certificate was subsequently cancelled, lost partnership
qualified status, or otherwise terminated during the reporting period;
and
(B) All active group long-term care partnership qualified insurance
policies, even if the identity of the individual policy/certificate
holder is unavailable.
(ii) The data required under paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section
must cover a 6-month reporting period of January through June 30 or
July 1 through December 31 of each year; and
(iii) The data must include, but are not limited to--
(A) Current identifying information on the insured individual;
(B) The name of the insurance company and issuing State;
(C) The effective date and terms of coverage under the policy.
(D) The annual premium.
(E) The coverage period.
(F) Other information, as specified by the Secretary in ``State
Long-Term Care Partnership Insurer Reporting Instructions.''
(2) Claims paid under partnership qualified policies or
certificates. Insurers must submit data on all partnership qualified
policies or certificates for which the insurer paid at least one claim
during the reporting period. This includes data for employer-paid core
plans and buy-up plans without individual insured data. The data must--
(i) Cover a quarterly reporting period of 3 months;
(ii) Include, but are not limited to--
(A) Current identifying information on the insured individual;
(B) The type and cash amount of the benefits paid during the
reporting period and lifetime to date;
(C) Remaining lifetime benefits;
(D) Other information, as specified by the Secretary in ``State
Long-Term Care Partnership Insurer Reporting Instructions.''
Sec. 144.208 Deadlines for submission of reports.
(a) Transition provision for insurers who have issued or exchanged
a qualified partnership policy prior to the effective date of these
regulations. The first reports required for these insurers will be the
reports that pertain to the reporting period that begins no more than
120 days after the effective date of the final regulations.
(b) All reports on the registry of qualified long-term care
insurance policies issued to individual and individuals under group
coverage specified in Sec. 144.206(b)(1)(ii) must be submitted within
30 days of the end of the 6-month reporting period.
(c) All reports on the claims paid under qualified long-term care
insurance policies issued to individual and individuals under group
coverage specified in Sec. 144.206(b)(2)(i) must be submitted within
30 days of the end of the 3-month quarterly reporting period.
Sec. 144.210 Form and manner of reports.
All reports specified in Sec. 144.206 must be submitted in the
form and manner specified by the Secretary in insurer reporting
instructions.
Sec. 144.212 Confidentiality of information.
Data collected and reported under the requirements of this subpart
are subject to the confidentiality of information requirements
specified in regulations under 42 CFR part 401, subpart B, and 45 CFR
part 5, subpart F.
Sec. 144.214 Notifications of noncompliance with reporting
requirements.
If an insurer of a qualified long-term care insurance policy does
not submit the required reports by the due dates specified in this
subpart, the Secretary notifies the appropriate State insurance
commissioner within 45 days after the deadline for submission of the
information and data specified in Sec. 144.208.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.778, Medical
Assistance Program)
Dated: February 12, 2008.
Ben Sasse,
Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.
Dated: February 12, 2008.
Michael O. Leavitt,
Secretary.
Editorial Note: The Office of the Federal Register received this
document on May 20, 2008.]
[FR Doc. E8-11559 Filed 5-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P