Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW), Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal, Chesapeake, VA, 29722-29723 [E8-11405]
Download as PDF
29722
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 100 / Thursday, May 22, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from fuel system
reviews conducted by the manufacturer. We
are issuing this AD to reduce the potential of
ignition sources inside fuel tanks, which, in
combination with flammable fuel vapors,
could result in fuel tank explosions and
consequent loss of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Note 1: This AD requires revisions to
certain operator maintenance documents to
include inspections. Compliance with these
inspections is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c).
For airplanes that have been previously
modified, altered, or repaired in the areas
addressed by these inspections, the operator
may not be able to accomplish the
inspections described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c),
the operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance according
to paragraph (j) of this AD. The request
should include a description of changes to
the required inspections that will ensure the
continued operational safety of the airplane.
Restatement of the Requirements of AD
2005–13–24
Modification and Installations
(f) Within 12 months after July 29, 2005
(the effective date of AD 2005–13–24), do the
actions in Table 1 of this AD in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
AvCraft Service Bulletin SB–328–00–445,
dated August 23, 2004; or Revision 1, dated
June 17, 2005.
TABLE 1.—REQUIREMENTS
Do the following actions—
By accomplishing all the actions specified in—
(1) Modify the electrical wiring of the left-hand and right-hand fuel pumps ...................................
(2) Install insulation at the left-hand and right-hand flow control and shut-off valves, and other
components of the environmental control system.
(3) Install markings at fuel wiring harnesses ..................................................................................
Paragraph 2.B(1) of the service bulletin.
Paragraph 2.B(2) of the service bulletin.
Revision to Airworthiness Limitations
(g) Within 12 months after July 29, 2005,
revise the Airworthiness Limitations section
of the Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness by inserting a copy of Dornier
Temporary Revision ALD–080, dated October
15, 2003, into the Dornier 328 Airworthiness
Limitations Document. Thereafter, except as
provided in paragraphs (i) and (j) of this AD,
no alternative inspection intervals may be
approved for this fuel tank system.
New Requirements of This AD
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
Revised Initial Compliance Time
(h) For Tasks 28–00–00–02 and 28–00–00–
03 (‘‘Detailed Inspection of Outer Fuel Tank
harness internal, LH/RH,’’ and ‘‘Detailed
Inspection of Inner Fuel Tank harness
internal, LH/RH’’), as identified in Dornier
Temporary Revision ALD–080, dated October
15, 2003, or Section F, ‘‘Fuel Tank System
Limitations,’’ of the Dornier 328
Airworthiness Limitations Document (ALD),
Revision 15, dated January 15, 2005; the
initial compliance time is within 8 years after
the effective date of this AD. Thereafter,
except as provided by paragraphs (i) and (j)
of this AD, these tasks must be accomplished
at the repetitive interval specified in Section
F, ‘‘Fuel Tank System Limitations,’’ of the
Dornier 328 ALD, Revision 15, dated January
15, 2005.
Later Revisions of the ALD
(i) After accomplishing the actions
specified in paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD,
no alternative inspections, inspection
intervals, or CDCCLs may be used unless the
inspections, intervals, or CDCCLs are part of
a later revision of Section F, ‘‘Fuel Tank
System Limitations,’’ of the Dornier 328 ALD,
Revision 15, dated January 15, 2005, that is
approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, FAA, or the European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (or its
delegated agent); or unless the inspections,
intervals, or CDCCLs are approved as an
alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (j) of this AD.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:55 May 21, 2008
Jkt 214001
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(j)(1) The Manager, ANM–116,
International Branch, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Related Information
(k) EASA airworthiness directive 2006–
0197 [Corrected], dated July 11, 2006, also
addresses the subject of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 14,
2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–11469 Filed 5–21–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2008–0229, Formerly
CGD05–07–021]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW),
Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal,
Chesapeake, VA
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Coast Guard, DHS.
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Paragraph 2.B(3) of the service bulletin.
Notice of proposed rulemaking;
withdrawal.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
withdrawing its notice of proposed
rulemaking concerning the proposed
change to the regulations that govern the
operation of the Centerville Turnpike
(SR 170) Bridge, at AIWW mile 15.2,
across the Albemarle and Chesapeake
Canal in Chesapeake, Virginia. The
requested change would have allowed
the bridge to open on signal every hour
on the half hour from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30
p.m., year round. The withdrawal is
based on further investigation indicating
that this change would not improve the
schedule for both roadway and
waterway users.
DATES: The proposed rule published on
April 6, 2007 (72 FR 17065), is
withdrawn on May 22, 2008.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this
withdrawn rulemaking is available for
inspection or copying at the Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. You may also
find this docket on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this notice,
call Bill H. Brazier, Bridge Management
Specialist, Fifth Coast Guard District, at
(757) 398–6422.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 6, 2007, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled ‘‘Drawbridge Operation
E:\FR\FM\22MYP1.SGM
22MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 100 / Thursday, May 22, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Regulations; Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway (AIWW), Albemarle and
Chesapeake Canal, Chesapeake, VA’’ in
the Federal Register (72 FR 17065). This
rulemaking would have allowed the
bridge to open on signal every hour on
the half hour from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30
p.m., year round.
Withdrawal
The City of Chesapeake, which owns
and operates this swing-type bridge, had
requested a change to the existing
regulations in an effort to improve the
travel for mariners to arrive at the Great
Bridge (S168) Bridge across the
Albemarle and Chesapeake, at AIWW
mile 12.0 at Chesapeake, (approximately
three miles away).
The Coast Guard conducted a lengthy
and thorough investigation with both
roadway and waterway users. Our
investigation revealed that the proposal
would not improve the transit of
waterway users because it would
impose possibly hazardous and
unnecessary delays on slower vessels,
such as sailboats and trawlers, that are
probably most of the transient vessels
needing openings at the bridge.
Additionally, all of the comments
received during the comment period
were in favor of keeping the current
schedule.
Authority
This action is taken under the
authority of 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR
1.05–1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
Dated: May 12, 2008.
Fred M. Rosa, Jr.,
Rear Admiral, United States Coast Guard,
Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E8–11405 Filed 5–21–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation (DOT)
to use the Docket Management Facility.
Please see DOT’s ‘‘Privacy Act’’
paragraph below.
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2008–0256]
RIN 1625–AA09
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Duwamish Waterway, Seattle, WA,
Schedule Change
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
modify the drawbridge operation
regulation for the Spokane Street Bridge
across the Duwamish Waterway, mile
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:19 May 21, 2008
Jkt 214001
0.3, in Seattle, Washington, by
establishing two daily closed draw
periods Monday through Friday. The
change is necessary to help alleviate
roadway traffic and will do so by
preventing traffic stoppages on either
side of the bridge during high volume
traffic periods. Large vessels would be
exempted from the closed draw periods.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
July 21, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by the Coast Guard docket
number USCG–2008–0256 to the Docket
Management Facility at the U.S.
Department of Transportation. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of the
following methods:
(1) Online: https://
www.regulations.gov.
(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(3) Hand delivery: Room W12–140 on
the Ground Floor of the West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202–366–9329.
(4) Fax: 202–493–2251.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call Austin Pratt, Chief, Bridge
Section, Waterways Management
Branch, 13th Coast Guard District,
telephone 206–220–7282. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking USCG–2008–0256, indicate
the specific section of this document to
which each comment applies, and give
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
29723
the reason for each comment. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an e-mail
address, or a phone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your
submission. You may submit your
comments and material by electronic
means, mail, fax, or delivery to the
Docket Management Facility at the
address under ADDRESSES; but please
submit your comments and material by
only one means. If you submit them by
mail or delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying. If you
submit them by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period. We may
change this proposed rule in view of
them.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov at any time.
Enter the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2008–0256) in the
search box, and click ‘‘Go>>.’’ You may
also visit either the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12–140 on the
ground floor of the DOT West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays or the 13th
Coast Guard District Waterways
Management Branch at 915 Second
Avenue, Seattle, WA 98174–1067
between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of all comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review the
Department of Transportation’s Privacy
Act Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477), or you may visit https://
DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting, but you may submit a request
for one to the Docket Management
Facility at the address under ADDRESSES
explaining why one would be
beneficial. If we determine that a public
meeting would aid this rulemaking, we
will hold one at a time and place
E:\FR\FM\22MYP1.SGM
22MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 100 (Thursday, May 22, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 29722-29723]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-11405]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2008-0229, Formerly CGD05-07-021]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway
(AIWW), Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal, Chesapeake, VA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; withdrawal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is withdrawing its notice of proposed
rulemaking concerning the proposed change to the regulations that
govern the operation of the Centerville Turnpike (SR 170) Bridge, at
AIWW mile 15.2, across the Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal in
Chesapeake, Virginia. The requested change would have allowed the
bridge to open on signal every hour on the half hour from 6:30 a.m. to
6:30 p.m., year round. The withdrawal is based on further investigation
indicating that this change would not improve the schedule for both
roadway and waterway users.
DATES: The proposed rule published on April 6, 2007 (72 FR 17065), is
withdrawn on May 22, 2008.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this withdrawn rulemaking is available for
inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. You may also find
this docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
notice, call Bill H. Brazier, Bridge Management Specialist, Fifth Coast
Guard District, at (757) 398-6422.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 6, 2007, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ``Drawbridge Operation
[[Page 29723]]
Regulations; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW), Albemarle and
Chesapeake Canal, Chesapeake, VA'' in the Federal Register (72 FR
17065). This rulemaking would have allowed the bridge to open on signal
every hour on the half hour from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., year round.
Withdrawal
The City of Chesapeake, which owns and operates this swing-type
bridge, had requested a change to the existing regulations in an effort
to improve the travel for mariners to arrive at the Great Bridge (S168)
Bridge across the Albemarle and Chesapeake, at AIWW mile 12.0 at
Chesapeake, (approximately three miles away).
The Coast Guard conducted a lengthy and thorough investigation with
both roadway and waterway users. Our investigation revealed that the
proposal would not improve the transit of waterway users because it
would impose possibly hazardous and unnecessary delays on slower
vessels, such as sailboats and trawlers, that are probably most of the
transient vessels needing openings at the bridge. Additionally, all of
the comments received during the comment period were in favor of
keeping the current schedule.
Authority
This action is taken under the authority of 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR
1.05-1; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
Dated: May 12, 2008.
Fred M. Rosa, Jr.,
Rear Admiral, United States Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. E8-11405 Filed 5-21-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P