Dominion Virginia Power; Establishment of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, 29541-29542 [E8-11339]
Download as PDF
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 21, 2008 / Notices
Once a petitioner/requestor has
obtained a digital ID certificate, had a
docket created, and downloaded the EIE
viewer, it can then submit a request for
hearing or petition for leave to
intervene. Submissions should be in
Portable Document Format (PDF) in
accordance with NRC guidance
available on the NRC public Web site at
https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html. A filing is considered
complete at the time the filer submits its
documents through EIE. To be timely,
an electronic filing must be submitted to
the EIE system no later than 11:59 p.m.
Eastern Time on the due date. Upon
receipt of a transmission, the E-Filing
system time-stamps the document and
sends the submitter an e-mail notice
confirming receipt of the document. The
EIE system also distributes an e-mail
notice that provides access to the
document to the NRC Office of the
General Counsel and any others who
have advised the Office of the Secretary
that they wish to participate in the
proceeding, so that the filer need not
serve the documents on those
participants separately. Therefore,
applicants and other participants (or
their counsel or representative) must
apply for and receive a digital ID
certificate before a hearing request/
petition to intervene is filed so that they
can obtain access to the document via
the E-Filing system.
A person filing electronically may
seek assistance through the ‘‘Contact
Us’’ link located on the NRC Web site
at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html or by calling the NRC
technical help line, which is available
between 8:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m.,
Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
The help line number is (800) 397–4209
or locally, (301) 415–4737.
Participants who believe that they
have a good cause for not submitting
documents electronically must file a
motion, in accordance with 10 CFR
2.302(g), with their initial paper filing
requesting authorization to continue to
submit documents in paper format.
Such filings must be submitted by: (1)
First class mail addressed to the Office
of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or
(2) courier, express mail, or expedited
delivery service to the Office of the
Secretary, Sixteenth Floor, One White
Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland 20852, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff.
Participants filing a document in this
manner are responsible for serving the
document on all other participants.
Filing is considered complete by first-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:18 May 20, 2008
Jkt 214001
class mail as of the time of deposit in
the mail, or by courier, express mail, or
expedited delivery service upon
depositing the document with the
provider of the service.
Non-timely requests and/or petitions
and contentions will not be entertained
absent a determination by the
Commission, the presiding officer, or
the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
that the petition and/or request should
be granted and/or the contentions
should be admitted based on a
balancing of the factors specified in 10
CFR 2.309(c)(1)(i)–(viii). To be timely,
filings must be submitted no later than
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the due
date.
Documents submitted in adjudicatory
proceedings will appear in NRC’s
electronic hearing docket which is
available to the public at https://
ehd.nrc.gov/EHD_Proceeding/home.asp,
unless excluded pursuant to an order of
the Commission, an Atomic Safety and
Licensing Board, or a Presiding Officer.
Participants are requested not to include
social security numbers in their filings.
With respect to copyrighted works,
except for limited excerpts that serve
the purpose of the adjudicatory filings
and would constitute a Fair Use
application, participants are requested
not to include copyrighted materials in
their submission.
The formal requirements for
documents contained in 10 CFR
2.304(c)–(e) must be met. If the NRC
grants an electronic document
exemption in accordance with 10 CFR
2.302(g)(3)), then the requirements for
paper documents, set forth in 10 CFR
2.304(b) must be met.
As indicated below, pursuant to 10
CFR 2.310(g), any hearing would be
subject to the procedures set forth in 10
CFR part 2, subpart M.
III. Opportunity To Provide Written
Comments
Within 30 days from the date of
publication of this notice, persons may
submit written comments regarding the
license transfer application, as provided
for in 10 CFR 2.1305. The Commission
will consider and, if appropriate,
respond to these comments, but such
comments will not otherwise constitute
part of the decisional record. Comments
should be submitted to the Secretary,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, Attention:
Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff,
and should cite the publication date and
page number of this Federal Register
notice. Comments received after 30 days
will be considered if practicable to do
so, but only those comments received
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29541
on or before the due date can be assured
consideration.
For further details with respect to this
license transfer application, see the
application dated January 25, 2008,
available for public inspection at the
Commission’s Public Document Room
(PDR), located at One White Flint North,
Public File Area O1 F21, 11555
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville,
Maryland. Publicly-available records
will be accessible electronically from
the Agency-Wide Documents Access
and Management System’s (ADAMS)
Public Electronic Reading Room on the
Internet at the NRC Web site https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
Persons who do not have access to
ADAMS or who encounter problems in
accessing the documents located in
ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR
Reference staff by telephone at 1–800–
397–4209, or 301–415–4737 or by e-mail
to pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 9th day
of May 2008.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Keith I. McConnell,
Deputy Director, Decommissioning and
Uranium Recovery Licensing Directorate
Division of Waste Management and
Environmental Protection, Office of Federal
and State Materials and Environmental
Management Programs.
[FR Doc. E8–11353 Filed 5–20–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 52–017–COL; ASLBP No. 08–
863–01–COL–BD01]
Dominion Virginia Power;
Establishment of Atomic Safety and
Licensing Board
Pursuant to delegation by the
Commission dated December 29, 1972,
published in the Federal Register, 37 FR
28,710 (1972), and the Commission’s
regulations, see 10 CFR 2.104, 2.300,
2.303, 2.309, 2.311, 2.318, and 2.321,
notice is hereby given that an Atomic
Safety and Licensing Board (Board) is
being established to preside over the
following proceeding:
Dominion Virginia Power
(North Anna Nuclear Power Station
Unit 3)
This proceeding concerns (1) a
Petition to Intervene and Request for
Hearing submitted by the Blue Ridge
Environmental Defense League and the
People’s Alliance for Clean Energy, and
(2) a Request of the North Carolina
Utilities Commission for an Opportunity
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
29542
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 21, 2008 / Notices
to Participate in any Hearing, both of
which were submitted in response to a
March 10, 2008, Notice of Hearing and
Opportunity to Petition for Leave to
Intervene on a Combined License for
North Anna Unit 3 (73 FR 12,760), and
an April 18, 2008, Supplement to Notice
of Hearing and Opportunity to Petition
for Leave to Intervene on a Combined
License for North Anna Unit 3 (73 FR
21,162). The Petition to Intervene and
Request for Hearing challenges the
application filed by Dominion Virginia
Power pursuant to Subpart C of 10 CFR
Part 52 for a combined license for North
Anna Unit 3, which would be located at
the North Anna Power Station in Louisa
County, Virginia.
The Board is comprised of the
following administrative judges:
Ronald M. Spritzer, Chair, Atomic
Safety and Licensing Board Panel,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001
Dr. Richard F. Cole, Atomic Safety and
Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001
Dr. Alice C. Mignerey, Atomic Safety
and Licensing Board Panel, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001
Additionally, during the contention
admissibility phase of this proceeding,
Administrative Judge Alan S. Rosenthal
shall function as the Board’s Special
Assistant pursuant to 10 CFR
2.322(a)(3).
All correspondence, documents, and
other materials shall be filed in
accordance with the NRC E–Filing rule,
which the NRC promulgated in August
2007 (72 FR 49,139).
Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th
day of May 2008.
E. Roy Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety
and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. E8–11339 Filed 5–20–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
[Docket No. 72–63; EA–08–144]
In the Matter of: FPL Energy Seabrook,
LLC Seabrook Station; Independent
Spent Fuel Storage Installation Order
Modifying License (Effective
Immediately)
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Issuance of Order for
Implementation of Additional Security
Measures and Fingerprinting for
Unescorted Access to Seabrook Station
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:18 May 20, 2008
Jkt 214001
Independent Spent Fuel Storage
Installation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Kevin M. Witt, Project Manager, Rules,
Inspections and Operations Branch,
Division of Spent Fuel Storage and
Transportation, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards (NMSS),
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC), Rockville, MD 20852. Telephone:
(301) 492–3323; fax number: (301) 492–
3348; e-mail: Kevin.Witt@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.106, NRC (or the
Commission) is providing notice, in the
matter of Seabrook Station Independent
Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI)
Order Modifying License (Effective
Immediately).
II. Further Information
I
NRC has issued a general license to
FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC (FPL)
authorizing the operation of an ISFSI, in
accordance with the Atomic Energy Act
of 1954, as amended, and Title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR)
part 72. This Order is being issued to
FPL, which has identified near-term
plans to store spent fuel in an ISFSI
under the general license provisions of
10 CFR part 72. The Commission’s
regulations at 10 CFR 72.212(b)(5) and
10 CFR 73.55(h)(1) require FPL to
maintain safeguards and contingency
plan procedures to respond to threats of
radiological sabotage and to protect the
spent fuel against the threat of
radiological sabotage, in accordance
with 10 CFR part 73, appendix C.
Specific safeguards requirements are
contained in 10 CFR 73.51 or 73.55, as
applicable.
Inasmuch as an insider has an
opportunity equal to, or greater than,
any other person, to commit radiological
sabotage, the Commission has
determined these measures to be
prudent. Comparable Orders have been
issued to all licensees that currently
store spent fuel, or have identified nearterm plans to store spent fuel, in an
ISFSI.
II
On September 11, 2001, terrorists
simultaneously attacked targets in New
York, NY, and Washington, DC, using
large commercial aircraft as weapons. In
response to the attacks and intelligence
information subsequently obtained, the
Commission issued a number of
Safeguards and Threat Advisories to its
licensees, to strengthen licensees’
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
capabilities and readiness to respond to
a potential attack on a nuclear facility.
On October 16, 2002, the Commission
issued Orders to the licensees of
operating ISFSIs, to place the actions
taken in response to the Advisories into
the established regulatory framework,
and to implement additional security
enhancements that emerged from NRC’s
ongoing comprehensive review. The
Commission has also communicated
with other Federal, State, and local
government agencies and industry
representatives to discuss and evaluate
the current threat environment, to assess
the adequacy of security measures at
licensed facilities. In addition, the
Commission has conducted a
comprehensive review of its safeguards
and security programs and
requirements.
As a result of its consideration of
current safeguards and security
requirements, as well as a review of
information provided by the intelligence
community, the Commission has
determined that certain additional
security measures (ASMs) are required
to address the current threat
environment, in a consistent manner,
throughout the nuclear ISFSI
community. Therefore, the Commission
is imposing requirements, as set forth in
Attachments 1 and 2 of this Order, on
all licensees of these facilities. These
requirements, which supplement
existing regulatory requirements, will
provide the Commission with
reasonable assurance that the public
health and safety and common defense
and security continue to be adequately
protected in the current threat
environment. These requirements will
remain in effect until the Commission
determines otherwise.
The Commission recognizes that FPL
may have already initiated many of the
measures set forth in Attachments 1 and
2 to this Order, in response to
previously issued advisories, or on their
own. It also recognizes that some
measures may not be possible nor
necessary at some sites, or may need to
be tailored to accommodate the specific
circumstances existing at FPL’s facility,
to achieve the intended objectives and
avoid any unforeseen effect on the safe
storage of spent fuel.
Although the ASMs already
implemented by licensees in response to
the Safeguards and Threat Advisories
have been sufficient to provide
reasonable assurance of adequate
protection of public health and safety,
the Commission concludes that these
actions must be supplemented further
because the current threat environment
continues to persist. Therefore, it is
appropriate to require certain ASMs,
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 99 (Wednesday, May 21, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29541-29542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-11339]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 52-017-COL; ASLBP No. 08-863-01-COL-BD01]
Dominion Virginia Power; Establishment of Atomic Safety and
Licensing Board
Pursuant to delegation by the Commission dated December 29, 1972,
published in the Federal Register, 37 FR 28,710 (1972), and the
Commission's regulations, see 10 CFR 2.104, 2.300, 2.303, 2.309, 2.311,
2.318, and 2.321, notice is hereby given that an Atomic Safety and
Licensing Board (Board) is being established to preside over the
following proceeding:
Dominion Virginia Power
(North Anna Nuclear Power Station Unit 3)
This proceeding concerns (1) a Petition to Intervene and Request
for Hearing submitted by the Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League
and the People's Alliance for Clean Energy, and (2) a Request of the
North Carolina Utilities Commission for an Opportunity
[[Page 29542]]
to Participate in any Hearing, both of which were submitted in response
to a March 10, 2008, Notice of Hearing and Opportunity to Petition for
Leave to Intervene on a Combined License for North Anna Unit 3 (73 FR
12,760), and an April 18, 2008, Supplement to Notice of Hearing and
Opportunity to Petition for Leave to Intervene on a Combined License
for North Anna Unit 3 (73 FR 21,162). The Petition to Intervene and
Request for Hearing challenges the application filed by Dominion
Virginia Power pursuant to Subpart C of 10 CFR Part 52 for a combined
license for North Anna Unit 3, which would be located at the North Anna
Power Station in Louisa County, Virginia.
The Board is comprised of the following administrative judges:
Ronald M. Spritzer, Chair, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dr. Richard F. Cole, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dr. Alice C. Mignerey, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001
Additionally, during the contention admissibility phase of this
proceeding, Administrative Judge Alan S. Rosenthal shall function as
the Board's Special Assistant pursuant to 10 CFR 2.322(a)(3).
All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed
in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule, which the NRC promulgated in
August 2007 (72 FR 49,139).
Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day of May 2008.
E. Roy Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. E8-11339 Filed 5-20-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P