Representative Rate; Order of Release From Competitive Level; Assignment Rights, 29387-29389 [E8-11283]
Download as PDF
29387
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 73, No. 99
Wednesday, May 21, 2008
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 351
RIN 3206–AL19
Representative Rate; Order of Release
From Competitive Level; Assignment
Rights
U.S. Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Final rule.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC69 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) is issuing final
regulations clarifying how an agency
determines employees’ retention rights
when the agency has positions in one or
more pay bands. These regulations also
clarify the order in which an agency
releases employees from a competitive
level. Finally, these regulations clarify
how an agency determines employees’
retention rights when a competitive area
includes more than one local
commuting area.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations
are effective June 20, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas A. Glennon by telephone on
202–606–0960, by FAX on 202–606–
2329, by TDD on 202–418–3134, or by
e-mail at employ@opm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March
15, 2007, OPM published proposed
reduction in force regulations in the
Federal Register at 72 FR 12122.
Interested parties could submit
comments to OPM on the regulations
through May 14, 2007. OPM received
comments from two agencies and one
individual on these proposed
regulations. Although OPM received
comments from one agency and the
individual shortly after the May 14,
2007, closing date, we considered these
comments in publishing final
regulations. We discuss all the
comments below.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:17 May 20, 2008
Jkt 214001
The individual asked OPM to clarify
that the pay band provisions in the
proposed regulations apply only to
reduction in force actions under part
351 of title 5, Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR), but do not apply to
actions under demonstration projects.
We found that no revision is necessary.
If an alternative retention system (such
as a retention system under a
demonstration project) is not subject to
part 351 of title 5, that system must
clearly state the legal basis for exclusion
from 5 CFR part 351.
The individual also asked OPM to
clarify the definition of ‘‘representative
rate’’ in section 351.203 for a General
Schedule (GS) employee stationed
outside the contiguous states (e.g.,
stationed in Alaska, Hawaii or overseas).
We have not revised the regulations to
address this suggestion. The definition
of representative rate for any employee
stationed outside the contiguous states
remains unchanged and continues as
the fourth step of the grade for a
position covered by the GS using the
base rate for GS positions. Employees in
Alaska and Hawaii may receive
nonforeign area cost-of-living allowance
payments under 5 U.S.C. 5941.
Employees in overseas locations may
receive cost-of-living allowances under
5 U.S.C. 5924. Such allowances are not
basic pay nor are they treated in a
manner similar to locality pay for GS
employees. Accordingly, such
allowances are not included in a
representative rate for reduction in force
purposes.
One agency asked OPM to clarify the
definition of ‘‘representative rate’’ in
section 351.203 for a Federal Wage
System (FWS) position. We are adopting
this suggestion by adding a reference in
section 351.203 to the definition of
‘‘representative rate’’ in 5 CFR 532.401
for FWS positions. Section 532.401
provides that the representative rate for
an FWS position is the second rate on
a five-rate regular wage schedule.
One agency suggested that OPM
delete the definition of ‘‘representative
rate’’ for pay band positions in
paragraph (3) of proposed section
351.203. For an alternative, the agency
suggested that, in reduction in force
competition, it would instead use the
pay-setting procedures that apply when
one of its employees moves internally
(e.g., via actions such as reassignment or
voluntary demotion) from a pay band
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
position to a position not covered by a
pay band. We did not adopt this
suggestion. The Supplementary
Information section of the proposed
regulations explained that comparing
representative rates is an impartial
procedure to determine employees’
potential ‘‘bump’’ or ‘‘retreat’’ right to a
position on a different retention register
when the positions are under different
pay schedules (e.g., to determine the
assignment rights of employees to and
from positions covered by the GS
system, FWS, and pay bands). In
contrast, an agency-specific procedure
to set pay based upon a voluntary or
management-initiated movement from a
pay band position to a position not
covered by a pay band may include
variables not covered by the proposed
definition of ‘‘representative rate’’ for
pay band positions in section 351.203.
As a result, an agency-specific paysetting procedure would not necessarily
ensure that all competing employees
have equivalent retention rights to and
from positions under different pay
schedules.
The two agencies suggested that
section 351.403(a)(5) include all the
criteria that an agency uses to determine
whether two or more positions are
interchangeable for purposes of
establishing reduction in force
competitive levels. Another comment
asked for clarification when pay band
positions are not interchangeable. We
found that no revision is needed
because section 351.403(a)(5) as written
explains that the agency applies section
351.403(a)(1) through (4) to determine
whether positions are interchangeable
and must be placed in the same
competitive level.
One agency asked whether section
351.403(a)(5) requires an agency to
establish separate competitive levels for
pay band positions with different
representative rates. The agency also
asked whether all positions in a pay
band must have different representative
rates if the pay band includes more than
one competitive level. As written,
section 351.403(a)(5) provides that the
agency establishes each pay band
competitive level to include
interchangeable positions. Only then
does the agency determine which
representative rate is applicable to that
competitive level.
One agency and the individual asked
that OPM provide criteria for the agency
E:\FR\FM\21MYR1.SGM
21MYR1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC69 with RULES
29388
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 21, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
to consider under section 351.701(g)
when determining which representative
rate to use for reduction in force
competition when a competitive area
includes more than one local
commuting area. We are not adopting
this suggestion because we believe that
the agency should have full discretion
to determine which local commuting
area is used as the basis for reduction in
force representative rates under section
351.701(g). This is consistent with the
agency’s responsibility to make
decisions under section 351.204.
The individual commenter noted that
employees’ potential assignment rights
may differ, depending upon which local
commuting area the agency designates
under section 351.701(g) as the basis for
representative rates when a competitive
area includes more than one local
commuting area. We explained in the
Supplementary Information section of
the proposed regulations that agencies
will, for the first time, determine
employees’ reduction in force
representative rates using a locality
component for both GS and FWS
positions. This is more equitable in
determining employees’ assignment
rights than the current procedure in
which the representative rate of FWS
employees is based on a local prevailing
rate, but the representative rate of GS
employees does not include a locality
component.
One agency asked OPM to clarify the
range of potential assignment rights
under section 351.708(h) when the
competitive area includes only pay band
positions. We found that no revision is
needed. The language of the proposed
regulation, which is further explained in
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION,
provides that a competitive service
employee has a potential assignment
right to a position in the same pay band
or one pay band lower than the pay
band from which released. In addition,
a competitive service preference eligible
employee with a service-connected
disability of 30 percent or more has a
potential assignment right to a position
in the same pay band or up to two pay
bands lower than the pay band from
which released. These grade limits
defining the range of potential
assignment rights are consistent with
the grade limits for a pay band
environment that OPM approved and
tested for demonstration projects for
more than two decades.
One agency asked OPM to provide
criteria for the agency to consider when
designating the representative rate for
pay band positions under paragraph (3)
of the definition in section 351.203
when, under section 351.701(i), the
competitive area includes pay band
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:17 May 20, 2008
Jkt 214001
positions and other positions not
covered by a pay band. We are not
adopting this suggestion because we
believe that the agency should have full
discretion to designate the
representative rate for pay band
positions, consistent with section
351.203 and the agency’s responsibility
to make decisions under section
351.204.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that this regulation will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
because it affects only certain Federal
employees.
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Review
This rule has been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget in
accordance with Executive Order 12866.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 351
Administrative practice and
procedure, Government employees.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Linda M. Springer,
Director.
Accordingly, OPM is amending part
351 of title 5, Code of Federal
Regulations, as follows:
I
PART 351—REDUCTION IN FORCE
1. The authority citation for part 351
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1302, 3502, 3503; sec.
351.801 also issued under E.O. 12828, 58 FR
2965.
2. In § 351.203, the definition of
‘‘representative rate’’ is revised to read
as follows:
I
§ 351.203
Definitions.
In this part:
*
*
*
*
*
Representative rate means:
(1) The fourth step of the grade for a
position covered by the General
Schedule, using the locality rate
authorized by 5 U.S.C. 5304 and subpart
F of part 531 of this chapter for General
Schedule positions;
(2) The prevailing rate for a position
covered by a wage-board or similar
wage-determining procedure, such as
provided in the definition of
representative rate for Federal Wage
System positions in 5 CFR 532.401 of
this chapter;
(3) For positions in a pay band, the
rate (or rates) the agency designates as
representative of that pay band or
competitive levels within the pay band,
including (as appropriate) any
applicable locality payment authorized
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
by 5 U.S.C. 5304 and subpart F of part
531 of this chapter (or equivalent
payment under other legal authority);
and
(4) For other positions (e.g., positions
in an unclassified pay system), the rate
the agency designates as representative
of the position, including (as
appropriate) any applicable locality
payment authorized by subpart F of part
531 (or equivalent payment under other
legal authority).
*
*
*
*
*
I 3. In § 351.403, paragraph (c)(4) is
revised, and paragraphs (a)(5), (c)(5),
and (c)(6) are added, to read as follows:
§ 351.403
Competitive level.
(a) * * *
(5) If a competitive area includes
positions in one or more pay bands,
each set of interchangeable positions in
the pay band under paragraphs (a)(1)
through (4) of this section is a separate
competitive level (e.g., with
interchangeable positions under
paragraphs (a)(1) through (4) of this
section, each pay band is one
competitive level; if the positions are
not interchangeable under paragraphs
(a)(1) through (4) of this section, the pay
band may include multiple competitive
levels).
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(4) A difference in the local wage
areas when a competitive area includes
positions covered by more than one
wage-board or similar wage-determining
procedure;
(5) A difference in locality payments
under 5 U.S.C. 5304 and subpart F of
part 531 of this chapter when a
competitive level includes more than
one locality pay area listed in § 531.603
of this chapter; or
(6) Representative rates in different
local commuting areas when a
competitive area includes General
Schedule (GS) and Federal Wage System
(FWS) positions in multiple GS locality
pay areas, and/or FWS local wage areas.
4. Section 351.601 is revised to read
as follows:
I
§ 351.601 Order of release from
competitive level.
(a) Each agency must select competing
employees for release from a
competitive level (including release
from a competitive level involving a pay
band) under this part in the inverse
order of retention standing, beginning
with the employee with the lowest
retention standing on the retention
register. An agency may not release a
competing employee from a competitive
level while retaining in that level an
E:\FR\FM\21MYR1.SGM
21MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 21, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
employee with lower retention standing
except:
(1) As required under § 351.606 when
an employee is retained under a
mandatory exception or under § 351.806
when an employee is entitled to a new
written notice of reduction in force; or
(2) As permitted under § 351.607
when an employee is retained under a
permissive continuing exception or
under § 351.608 when an employee is
retained under a permissive temporary
exception.
(b) At its option an agency may
provide for intervening displacement
within the competitive level before final
release of the employee with the lowestretention standing from the competitive
level.
(c) When employees in the same
retention subgroup have identical
service dates and are tied for release
from a competitive level, the agency
may select any tied employee for
release.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC69 with RULES
*
*
*
*
(g) If a competitive area includes more
than one local commuting area, the
agency determines assignment rights
under this part on the basis of the
representative rates for one local
commuting area within the competitive
area (i.e., the same local commuting area
used to establish competitive levels
under § 351.403(c)(4), (5), and (6)).
(h) If a competitive area includes
positions under one or more pay bands,
a released employee shall be assigned in
accordance with paragraphs (a) through
(d) of this section to a position in an
equivalent pay band or one pay band
lower, as determined by the agency,
than the pay band from which released.
A preference eligible with a serviceconnected disability of 30 percent or
more must be assigned in accordance
with paragraphs (a) through (d) of this
section to a position in an equivalent
pay band or up to two pay bands lower,
as determined by the agency, than the
pay band from which released.
(i) If a competitive area includes
positions under one or more pay bands,
and other positions not covered by a pay
band (e.g., GS and/or FWS positions),
the agency provides assignment rights
under this part by:
(1) Determining the representative
rate of positions not covered by a pay
band, consistent with § 351.203;
(2) Determining the representative
rate of each pay band, or competitive
level within the pay band(s), consistent
with § 351.203;
14:17 May 20, 2008
Jkt 214001
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1160
[Docket No. AMS–DA–07–0156; DA–07–05]
National Fluid Milk Processor
Promotion Program
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
§ 351.701 Assignment involving
displacement.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
[FR Doc. E8–11283 Filed 5–20–08; 8:45 am]
AGENCY:
5. In § 351.701, paragraphs (g), (h),
and (i) are added, to read as follows:
I
*
(3) As determined by the agency,
providing assignment rights under
paragraph (b) of this section (bumping),
or paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section
(retreating), consistent with the grade
intervals covered in paragraphs (b)(2)
and (c)(2) of this section, and the pay
band intervals in paragraph (h) of this
section.
SUMMARY: This final rule amends the
Fluid Milk Promotion Order (Order) by
reducing the burden of late-payment
charges applied to processors who
mistakenly underreport the amount of
assessments owed to the National Fluid
Milk Processor Promotion Board
(Board), provided that the processor has
not made more than two reporting errors
in the prior 12 months.
DATES: Effective Date: July 1, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Whitney A. Rick, Chief, Promotion and
Research Branch, Dairy Programs, AMS,
USDA, 1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
Room 2958–S, Stop 0233, Washington,
DC 20250–0233. Phone: (202) 720–6909.
E-mail: Whitney.Rick@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final
rule adopts a proposal submitted by the
Board to reduce the burden of late
payment fees applied to processors who
underreport the amount of assessments
they owe due to unintentional errors or
miscalculations. Specifically, the
amendment reduces late-payment
charges provided that the processor has
not made more than two reporting errors
in the prior 12 months.
The Fluid Milk Promotion Order is
issued under the Fluid Milk Promotion
Act as amended (Act) [7 U.S.C. 6401–
6417].
29389
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
to have a retroactive effect. This rule
will not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 1999K of the Act, any person
subject to the Order may file with the
Secretary of Agriculture (Secretary) a
petition stating that the Order, any
provision of the Order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the Order
is not in accordance with the law and
request a modification of the Order or to
be exempted from the Order. Such
person is afforded the opportunity for a
hearing on the petition. After a hearing,
the Secretary would rule on the petition.
The Act provides that the district court
of the United States in any district in
which the person is an inhabitant, or
has his principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review the Secretary’s
ruling on the petition, provided a
complaint is filed not later than 20 days
after the date of the entry of the ruling.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Agricultural Marketing Service
(AMS) has determined that this final
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, as defined by
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601–612). The final rule imposes no
new burden on the industry but will in
fact reduce late-payment charges
applied to processors who underreport
the amount of assessments which they
owe to the Board provided that the
processors have not made more than
two reporting errors in the prior 12
months.
Small businesses in the fluid milk
processing industry have been defined
by the Small Business Administration
(13 CFR 121.201) as those processors
employing not more than 500
employees. As of April 2008, there were
approximately 100 fluid milk processors
subject to the provisions of the Order.
While some processors own multiple
plants, the majority of processors own
just one plant with fewer than 500
employees, and are, therefore, small
entities.
Executive Order 12866
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Office of Management and Budget
has waived the review process required
by Executive Order 12866 for this
action.
Information collection requirements
and recordkeeping provisions contained
in 7 CFR Part 1250 have been previously
approved by the Office of Management
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\21MYR1.SGM
21MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 99 (Wednesday, May 21, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29387-29389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-11283]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 21, 2008 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 29387]]
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 351
RIN 3206-AL19
Representative Rate; Order of Release From Competitive Level;
Assignment Rights
AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing final
regulations clarifying how an agency determines employees' retention
rights when the agency has positions in one or more pay bands. These
regulations also clarify the order in which an agency releases
employees from a competitive level. Finally, these regulations clarify
how an agency determines employees' retention rights when a competitive
area includes more than one local commuting area.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations are effective June 20, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas A. Glennon by telephone on 202-
606-0960, by FAX on 202-606-2329, by TDD on 202-418-3134, or by e-mail
at employ@opm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 15, 2007, OPM published proposed
reduction in force regulations in the Federal Register at 72 FR 12122.
Interested parties could submit comments to OPM on the regulations
through May 14, 2007. OPM received comments from two agencies and one
individual on these proposed regulations. Although OPM received
comments from one agency and the individual shortly after the May 14,
2007, closing date, we considered these comments in publishing final
regulations. We discuss all the comments below.
The individual asked OPM to clarify that the pay band provisions in
the proposed regulations apply only to reduction in force actions under
part 351 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), but do not
apply to actions under demonstration projects. We found that no
revision is necessary. If an alternative retention system (such as a
retention system under a demonstration project) is not subject to part
351 of title 5, that system must clearly state the legal basis for
exclusion from 5 CFR part 351.
The individual also asked OPM to clarify the definition of
``representative rate'' in section 351.203 for a General Schedule (GS)
employee stationed outside the contiguous states (e.g., stationed in
Alaska, Hawaii or overseas). We have not revised the regulations to
address this suggestion. The definition of representative rate for any
employee stationed outside the contiguous states remains unchanged and
continues as the fourth step of the grade for a position covered by the
GS using the base rate for GS positions. Employees in Alaska and Hawaii
may receive nonforeign area cost-of-living allowance payments under 5
U.S.C. 5941. Employees in overseas locations may receive cost-of-living
allowances under 5 U.S.C. 5924. Such allowances are not basic pay nor
are they treated in a manner similar to locality pay for GS employees.
Accordingly, such allowances are not included in a representative rate
for reduction in force purposes.
One agency asked OPM to clarify the definition of ``representative
rate'' in section 351.203 for a Federal Wage System (FWS) position. We
are adopting this suggestion by adding a reference in section 351.203
to the definition of ``representative rate'' in 5 CFR 532.401 for FWS
positions. Section 532.401 provides that the representative rate for an
FWS position is the second rate on a five-rate regular wage schedule.
One agency suggested that OPM delete the definition of
``representative rate'' for pay band positions in paragraph (3) of
proposed section 351.203. For an alternative, the agency suggested
that, in reduction in force competition, it would instead use the pay-
setting procedures that apply when one of its employees moves
internally (e.g., via actions such as reassignment or voluntary
demotion) from a pay band position to a position not covered by a pay
band. We did not adopt this suggestion. The Supplementary Information
section of the proposed regulations explained that comparing
representative rates is an impartial procedure to determine employees'
potential ``bump'' or ``retreat'' right to a position on a different
retention register when the positions are under different pay schedules
(e.g., to determine the assignment rights of employees to and from
positions covered by the GS system, FWS, and pay bands). In contrast,
an agency-specific procedure to set pay based upon a voluntary or
management-initiated movement from a pay band position to a position
not covered by a pay band may include variables not covered by the
proposed definition of ``representative rate'' for pay band positions
in section 351.203. As a result, an agency-specific pay-setting
procedure would not necessarily ensure that all competing employees
have equivalent retention rights to and from positions under different
pay schedules.
The two agencies suggested that section 351.403(a)(5) include all
the criteria that an agency uses to determine whether two or more
positions are interchangeable for purposes of establishing reduction in
force competitive levels. Another comment asked for clarification when
pay band positions are not interchangeable. We found that no revision
is needed because section 351.403(a)(5) as written explains that the
agency applies section 351.403(a)(1) through (4) to determine whether
positions are interchangeable and must be placed in the same
competitive level.
One agency asked whether section 351.403(a)(5) requires an agency
to establish separate competitive levels for pay band positions with
different representative rates. The agency also asked whether all
positions in a pay band must have different representative rates if the
pay band includes more than one competitive level. As written, section
351.403(a)(5) provides that the agency establishes each pay band
competitive level to include interchangeable positions. Only then does
the agency determine which representative rate is applicable to that
competitive level.
One agency and the individual asked that OPM provide criteria for
the agency
[[Page 29388]]
to consider under section 351.701(g) when determining which
representative rate to use for reduction in force competition when a
competitive area includes more than one local commuting area. We are
not adopting this suggestion because we believe that the agency should
have full discretion to determine which local commuting area is used as
the basis for reduction in force representative rates under section
351.701(g). This is consistent with the agency's responsibility to make
decisions under section 351.204.
The individual commenter noted that employees' potential assignment
rights may differ, depending upon which local commuting area the agency
designates under section 351.701(g) as the basis for representative
rates when a competitive area includes more than one local commuting
area. We explained in the Supplementary Information section of the
proposed regulations that agencies will, for the first time, determine
employees' reduction in force representative rates using a locality
component for both GS and FWS positions. This is more equitable in
determining employees' assignment rights than the current procedure in
which the representative rate of FWS employees is based on a local
prevailing rate, but the representative rate of GS employees does not
include a locality component.
One agency asked OPM to clarify the range of potential assignment
rights under section 351.708(h) when the competitive area includes only
pay band positions. We found that no revision is needed. The language
of the proposed regulation, which is further explained in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, provides that a competitive service employee
has a potential assignment right to a position in the same pay band or
one pay band lower than the pay band from which released. In addition,
a competitive service preference eligible employee with a service-
connected disability of 30 percent or more has a potential assignment
right to a position in the same pay band or up to two pay bands lower
than the pay band from which released. These grade limits defining the
range of potential assignment rights are consistent with the grade
limits for a pay band environment that OPM approved and tested for
demonstration projects for more than two decades.
One agency asked OPM to provide criteria for the agency to consider
when designating the representative rate for pay band positions under
paragraph (3) of the definition in section 351.203 when, under section
351.701(i), the competitive area includes pay band positions and other
positions not covered by a pay band. We are not adopting this
suggestion because we believe that the agency should have full
discretion to designate the representative rate for pay band positions,
consistent with section 351.203 and the agency's responsibility to make
decisions under section 351.204.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that this regulation will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities because it affects
only certain Federal employees.
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Review
This rule has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
in accordance with Executive Order 12866.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 351
Administrative practice and procedure, Government employees.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Linda M. Springer,
Director.
0
Accordingly, OPM is amending part 351 of title 5, Code of Federal
Regulations, as follows:
PART 351--REDUCTION IN FORCE
0
1. The authority citation for part 351 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1302, 3502, 3503; sec. 351.801 also issued
under E.O. 12828, 58 FR 2965.
0
2. In Sec. 351.203, the definition of ``representative rate'' is
revised to read as follows:
Sec. 351.203 Definitions.
In this part:
* * * * *
Representative rate means:
(1) The fourth step of the grade for a position covered by the
General Schedule, using the locality rate authorized by 5 U.S.C. 5304
and subpart F of part 531 of this chapter for General Schedule
positions;
(2) The prevailing rate for a position covered by a wage-board or
similar wage-determining procedure, such as provided in the definition
of representative rate for Federal Wage System positions in 5 CFR
532.401 of this chapter;
(3) For positions in a pay band, the rate (or rates) the agency
designates as representative of that pay band or competitive levels
within the pay band, including (as appropriate) any applicable locality
payment authorized by 5 U.S.C. 5304 and subpart F of part 531 of this
chapter (or equivalent payment under other legal authority); and
(4) For other positions (e.g., positions in an unclassified pay
system), the rate the agency designates as representative of the
position, including (as appropriate) any applicable locality payment
authorized by subpart F of part 531 (or equivalent payment under other
legal authority).
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 351.403, paragraph (c)(4) is revised, and paragraphs
(a)(5), (c)(5), and (c)(6) are added, to read as follows:
Sec. 351.403 Competitive level.
(a) * * *
(5) If a competitive area includes positions in one or more pay
bands, each set of interchangeable positions in the pay band under
paragraphs (a)(1) through (4) of this section is a separate competitive
level (e.g., with interchangeable positions under paragraphs (a)(1)
through (4) of this section, each pay band is one competitive level; if
the positions are not interchangeable under paragraphs (a)(1) through
(4) of this section, the pay band may include multiple competitive
levels).
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(4) A difference in the local wage areas when a competitive area
includes positions covered by more than one wage-board or similar wage-
determining procedure;
(5) A difference in locality payments under 5 U.S.C. 5304 and
subpart F of part 531 of this chapter when a competitive level includes
more than one locality pay area listed in Sec. 531.603 of this
chapter; or
(6) Representative rates in different local commuting areas when a
competitive area includes General Schedule (GS) and Federal Wage System
(FWS) positions in multiple GS locality pay areas, and/or FWS local
wage areas.
0
4. Section 351.601 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 351.601 Order of release from competitive level.
(a) Each agency must select competing employees for release from a
competitive level (including release from a competitive level involving
a pay band) under this part in the inverse order of retention standing,
beginning with the employee with the lowest retention standing on the
retention register. An agency may not release a competing employee from
a competitive level while retaining in that level an
[[Page 29389]]
employee with lower retention standing except:
(1) As required under Sec. 351.606 when an employee is retained
under a mandatory exception or under Sec. 351.806 when an employee is
entitled to a new written notice of reduction in force; or
(2) As permitted under Sec. 351.607 when an employee is retained
under a permissive continuing exception or under Sec. 351.608 when an
employee is retained under a permissive temporary exception.
(b) At its option an agency may provide for intervening
displacement within the competitive level before final release of the
employee with the lowest-retention standing from the competitive level.
(c) When employees in the same retention subgroup have identical
service dates and are tied for release from a competitive level, the
agency may select any tied employee for release.
0
5. In Sec. 351.701, paragraphs (g), (h), and (i) are added, to read as
follows:
Sec. 351.701 Assignment involving displacement.
* * * * *
(g) If a competitive area includes more than one local commuting
area, the agency determines assignment rights under this part on the
basis of the representative rates for one local commuting area within
the competitive area (i.e., the same local commuting area used to
establish competitive levels under Sec. 351.403(c)(4), (5), and (6)).
(h) If a competitive area includes positions under one or more pay
bands, a released employee shall be assigned in accordance with
paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section to a position in an
equivalent pay band or one pay band lower, as determined by the agency,
than the pay band from which released. A preference eligible with a
service-connected disability of 30 percent or more must be assigned in
accordance with paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section to a
position in an equivalent pay band or up to two pay bands lower, as
determined by the agency, than the pay band from which released.
(i) If a competitive area includes positions under one or more pay
bands, and other positions not covered by a pay band (e.g., GS and/or
FWS positions), the agency provides assignment rights under this part
by:
(1) Determining the representative rate of positions not covered by
a pay band, consistent with Sec. 351.203;
(2) Determining the representative rate of each pay band, or
competitive level within the pay band(s), consistent with Sec.
351.203;
(3) As determined by the agency, providing assignment rights under
paragraph (b) of this section (bumping), or paragraphs (c) and (d) of
this section (retreating), consistent with the grade intervals covered
in paragraphs (b)(2) and (c)(2) of this section, and the pay band
intervals in paragraph (h) of this section.
[FR Doc. E8-11283 Filed 5-20-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-39-P