Caribou-Targhee National Forest, ID; Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Targhee Revised Forest Plan With Proposed Forest Plan Amendment, 29480-29481 [E8-11248]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
29480
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 21, 2008 / Notices
OMB Control Number: 0578–0030.
Summary of Collection: The
Emergency Watershed Protection (EWP)
Program regulations at 7 CFR 624 set
forth the basic policies, program
provisions, and eligibility requirements
for sponsors to participate in the EWP
program. The Natural Resource
Conservation Service (NRCS) is
responsible for administration of EWP
Program. EWP assistance is provided to
sponsors to undertake emergency
measures for runoff retardation and soil
erosion prevention to safeguard lives
and property from floods, drought, and
the products of erosion on any
watershed whenever fire, flood, or any
other natural disaster occurrence is
causing or has caused a sudden
impairment of that watershed. The
sponsor’s request is submitted formally
as a letter (NRCS–PDM–20A) to the
NRCS State Conservationist for
consideration. Form NRCS–PDM–20,
Damage Survey Report (DSR) is the
agency decision-making document that
includes the economic, social, and
environmental evaluation, as well as the
engineer’s cost estimate.
Need and Use of the Information: The
collected information allows the
responsible federal official to make EWP
eligibility determinations and provide
federal cost-share payments to the
sponsors. Without the information
NRCS would not be able to implement
the program.
Description of Respondents: State,
Local, or Tribal Government.
Number of Respondents: 190.
Frequency of Responses: Reporting:
Other (Disaster Occurrence).
Total Burden Hours: 5,035.
Ruth Brown,
Departmental Information Collection
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E8–11357 Filed 5–20–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Caribou-Targhee National Forest, ID;
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement for the Targhee Revised
Forest Plan With Proposed Forest Plan
Amendment
Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a
supplemental environmental impact
statement.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Caribou-Targhee National
Forest is proposing to prepare a
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement (SEIS) to the Targhee Revised
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:18 May 20, 2008
Jkt 214001
Forest Plan (FEIS) to disclose effects of
a proposed amendment to the TRFP to
address Plan direction for forested
vegetation that presently does not reflect
the ecological capability of forest
ecosystems found on the Targhee
National Forest and to also clarify TRFP
direction on snags.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received within
45 days from the date of this
publication. The draft supplemental
environmental impact statement is
expected July of 2008 and the final
supplemental environmental impact
statement is expected November 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Robbin Redman, Forest Planner,
Caribou-Targhee National Forest, 1405
Hollipark Drive, Idaho Falls, Idaho.
Electronic comments can be sent to
comments-intermtn-cariboutarghee@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robbin Redman, Forest Planner,
Caribou-Targhee National Forest, 1405
Hollipark Drive, Idaho Falls, Idaho
83401 or telephone (208) 557–5821.
Purpose and Need for Action
The Caribou-Targhee National Forest
(C–T) has completed an assessment of
forest vegetation for the Targhee portion
of the C–T and in addition to this
assessment the Forest has previously
completed identification of the properly
functioning condition (PFC) for forested
landscapes in the Madison-Pitchstone
Plateau Subsection. Scientific research
papers published after the TRFP and
PFC were also completed that help the
Forest to identify desired conditions
that better match the ecological
capabilities of forested vegetation
including a range of amounts and
distribution of old growth and late seral
structural stages by forest type.
The results of the information
discussed above indicate a need to
amend guidance in the TRFP for old
growth and late seral structural stages to
better describe desired conditions in the
TRFP for old growth and late seral
structural stages. Specifically, review of
existing information and TRFP direction
indicates the following:
The TRFP established guidelines for
old growth and late seral forest stages
that suggest minimum percentages of
forested acres of old growth and late
seral forest be present in each principal
watershed. Presence and persistence of
late seral stages and old growth are
highly dependent on natural
disturbance cycles that vary with forest
type. For example, several principal
watersheds are dominated by the
lodgepole pine forest type, which rarely
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
develops old growth conditions on the
Targhee National Forest. Natural
disturbance cycles in lodgepole pine
forest such as insects, disease, and fire
recur frequently enough to preclude
development of old-growth conditions
in most of this type. Therefore, the old
growth and late seral guidelines
presently in the TRFP do not reflect the
ecological capability of these forest
ecosystems.
Similarly, several principal
watersheds have a large component of
the aspen forest type. On the Targhee,
aspen is primarily seral to conifer.
Stable aspen is rare and limited to harsh
sites generally along ecotones with poor
growing conditions where conifer
cannot establish. Absent disturbances in
seral types, these aspen stands will
eventually be replaced by conifer types
and it is unlikely that late seral or old
growth aspen stands will develop or
persist. Even though the ecological
capability of these forest types is
different from others such as spruce/fir
the Forest is still proposing to manage
for old growth and replacement old
growth in these forest types, this would
be for vegetation diversity.
Recent insect outbreaks have changed
the number and distribution of snags
over much of the Targhee NF. Currently
TRFP snag direction requires several
levels of analysis of snags: at the
prescription area, at the watershed level
and at a 100 acre level. This direction
will be reviewed and adjusted to reflect
current conditions and allow for
wildlife habitat needs.
Proposed Action
The Caribou-Targhee National Forest
is proposing to amend the TRFP with
regard to Plan direction for old growth
and late seral forested vegetation. The
Proposed old growth direction will be to
manage for ten percent of forested acres
in a combination of old growth and
replacement old growth in ecological
subsections. The old growth would meet
Region 4 Characteristics of Old Growth
Forests definitions. The Forest is also
proposing to clarify snag direction in
the Plan to allow more ease in
implementation while still providing for
wildlife habitat needs.
Possible Alternatives
The Forest has developed the
Proposed Action and the no-action
alternative which is to continue with
current TRFP direction.
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
The Caribou-Targhee National Forest
is the lead agency for this project.
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 21, 2008 / Notices
Responsible Official
The responsible official is: Larry
Timchak, Forest Supervisor, CaribouTarghee National Forest, 1405 Hollipark
Drive, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
Given the purpose and need, the
deciding officer will decide whether or
not to amend the Targhee Revised
Forest Plan with regard to TRFP
direction for old growth and late seral
structural stages and to clarify TRFP
snag direction.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
Scoping Process
The C–T Forest is now seeking
comments on this proposal and will
seek comments on the Draft
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement when it becomes available.
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process which guides the
development of the supplemental
environmental impact statement. The
Forest is seeking comments that may be
used to develop alternatives to the
Proposed Action. We are seeking
specific comments on snag requirements
for cavity nesters for the TRFP,
specifically management guidance for
retention of snags and specific
comments on a more appropriate
percentage of old growth and at what
level it is appropriate to be maintained
for vegetation diversity. To be most
helpful comments should include
rationale for any recommendations.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft
supplemental environmental impact
statement will be prepared for comment.
The comment period on the draft
supplemental environmental impact
statement will be 45 days from the date
the Environmental Protection Agency
publishes the notice of availability in
the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft supplemental
environmental impact statements must
structure their participation in the
environmental review of the proposal so
that it is meaningful and alerts an
agency to the reviewer’s position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear
Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519. 553
(1978). Also, environmental objections
that could be raised at the draft
environmental impact statement stage
but that are not raised until after
completion of the final environmental
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:18 May 20, 2008
Jkt 214001
impact statement may be waived or
dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon
v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir.
1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v.
Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D.
Wis. 1980). Because of these court
rulings, it is very important that those
interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45 day
comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
impact statement should be as specific
as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21.
Dated: May 14, 2008.
Lawrence Timchak,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E8–11248 Filed 5–20–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–122–840)
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire
Rod from Canada: Notice of Amended
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 21, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Salim Bhabhrawala or David Neubacher,
at (202) 482–1784 or (202) 482–5823,
respectively; AD/CVD Operations,
Office 1, Import Administration,
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29481
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street & Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20230.
On
January 24, 2006, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published in
the Federal Register the final results for
the second administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on carbon and
certain alloy steel wire rod from Canada.
See Notice of Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review: Carbon and Certain Steel Alloy
Steel Wire Rod from Canada, 71 FR
3822 (Jan. 24, 2006) (Final Results).
Mittal Canada, Inc. (formerly Ispat
Sidbec Inc.) (‘‘Mittal’’) challenged
several aspects of the Final Results
before a NAFTA binational panel. On
November 28, 2007, the panel issued a
decision. See Carbon and Certain Alloy
Steel Wire Rod from Canada, Decision
of the Panel, USA–CDA–2006–1904–04
(Nov. 28, 2007).
On April 17, 2008, the United States
Department of Commerce, Mittal, and
Gerdau Ameristeel U.S., Inc. and
Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc.
entered into a Settlement Agreement
covering this NAFTA proceeding
(‘‘Agreement’’). Pursuant to this
settlement of litigation, Mittal filed a
consent motion to terminate the panel
review and vacate the panel’s decisions
in the proceeding referenced above. On
April 29, 2008, the NAFTA Secretariat
of the U.S. Section published the notice
of termination of the panel review. See
North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA), Article 1904; Binational Panel
Reviews: Notice of Consent Motion to
Terminate Panel Review, 73 FR 23183
(Apr. 29, 2008). The review period
covered by these amended final results
is from October 1, 2003 through
September 30, 2004.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Assessment of Duties
Pursuant to the Agreement, the
Department is amending the final
results of the contested review and will
instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to liquidate all entries
of Canadian wire rod that were entered,
or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption during the period of
October 1, 2003 through September 30,
2004, that were produced and exported
by Mittal or Ispat Sidbec Inc., at the
assessment rate of 3.86% ad valorem.
Because parties waived any right to
challenge these amended final results
pursuant to the Agreement, the
Department will issue assessment
instructions to CBP following
publication of this notice.
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 99 (Wednesday, May 21, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29480-29481]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-11248]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Caribou-Targhee National Forest, ID; Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement for the Targhee Revised Forest Plan With Proposed
Forest Plan Amendment
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a supplemental environmental impact
statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Caribou-Targhee National Forest is proposing to prepare a
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) to the Targhee
Revised Forest Plan (FEIS) to disclose effects of a proposed amendment
to the TRFP to address Plan direction for forested vegetation that
presently does not reflect the ecological capability of forest
ecosystems found on the Targhee National Forest and to also clarify
TRFP direction on snags.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
within 45 days from the date of this publication. The draft
supplemental environmental impact statement is expected July of 2008
and the final supplemental environmental impact statement is expected
November 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Robbin Redman, Forest Planner,
Caribou-Targhee National Forest, 1405 Hollipark Drive, Idaho Falls,
Idaho. Electronic comments can be sent to comments-intermtn-caribou-
targhee@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robbin Redman, Forest Planner,
Caribou-Targhee National Forest, 1405 Hollipark Drive, Idaho Falls,
Idaho 83401 or telephone (208) 557-5821.
Purpose and Need for Action
The Caribou-Targhee National Forest (C-T) has completed an
assessment of forest vegetation for the Targhee portion of the C-T and
in addition to this assessment the Forest has previously completed
identification of the properly functioning condition (PFC) for forested
landscapes in the Madison-Pitchstone Plateau Subsection. Scientific
research papers published after the TRFP and PFC were also completed
that help the Forest to identify desired conditions that better match
the ecological capabilities of forested vegetation including a range of
amounts and distribution of old growth and late seral structural stages
by forest type.
The results of the information discussed above indicate a need to
amend guidance in the TRFP for old growth and late seral structural
stages to better describe desired conditions in the TRFP for old growth
and late seral structural stages. Specifically, review of existing
information and TRFP direction indicates the following:
The TRFP established guidelines for old growth and late seral
forest stages that suggest minimum percentages of forested acres of old
growth and late seral forest be present in each principal watershed.
Presence and persistence of late seral stages and old growth are highly
dependent on natural disturbance cycles that vary with forest type. For
example, several principal watersheds are dominated by the lodgepole
pine forest type, which rarely develops old growth conditions on the
Targhee National Forest. Natural disturbance cycles in lodgepole pine
forest such as insects, disease, and fire recur frequently enough to
preclude development of old-growth conditions in most of this type.
Therefore, the old growth and late seral guidelines presently in the
TRFP do not reflect the ecological capability of these forest
ecosystems.
Similarly, several principal watersheds have a large component of
the aspen forest type. On the Targhee, aspen is primarily seral to
conifer. Stable aspen is rare and limited to harsh sites generally
along ecotones with poor growing conditions where conifer cannot
establish. Absent disturbances in seral types, these aspen stands will
eventually be replaced by conifer types and it is unlikely that late
seral or old growth aspen stands will develop or persist. Even though
the ecological capability of these forest types is different from
others such as spruce/fir the Forest is still proposing to manage for
old growth and replacement old growth in these forest types, this would
be for vegetation diversity.
Recent insect outbreaks have changed the number and distribution of
snags over much of the Targhee NF. Currently TRFP snag direction
requires several levels of analysis of snags: at the prescription area,
at the watershed level and at a 100 acre level. This direction will be
reviewed and adjusted to reflect current conditions and allow for
wildlife habitat needs.
Proposed Action
The Caribou-Targhee National Forest is proposing to amend the TRFP
with regard to Plan direction for old growth and late seral forested
vegetation. The Proposed old growth direction will be to manage for ten
percent of forested acres in a combination of old growth and
replacement old growth in ecological subsections. The old growth would
meet Region 4 Characteristics of Old Growth Forests definitions. The
Forest is also proposing to clarify snag direction in the Plan to allow
more ease in implementation while still providing for wildlife habitat
needs.
Possible Alternatives
The Forest has developed the Proposed Action and the no-action
alternative which is to continue with current TRFP direction.
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
The Caribou-Targhee National Forest is the lead agency for this
project.
[[Page 29481]]
Responsible Official
The responsible official is: Larry Timchak, Forest Supervisor,
Caribou-Targhee National Forest, 1405 Hollipark Drive, Idaho Falls,
Idaho 83401.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
Given the purpose and need, the deciding officer will decide
whether or not to amend the Targhee Revised Forest Plan with regard to
TRFP direction for old growth and late seral structural stages and to
clarify TRFP snag direction.
Scoping Process
The C-T Forest is now seeking comments on this proposal and will
seek comments on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement
when it becomes available.
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process which guides
the development of the supplemental environmental impact statement. The
Forest is seeking comments that may be used to develop alternatives to
the Proposed Action. We are seeking specific comments on snag
requirements for cavity nesters for the TRFP, specifically management
guidance for retention of snags and specific comments on a more
appropriate percentage of old growth and at what level it is
appropriate to be maintained for vegetation diversity. To be most
helpful comments should include rationale for any recommendations.
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft supplemental environmental impact
statement will be prepared for comment. The comment period on the draft
supplemental environmental impact statement will be 45 days from the
date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes the notice of
availability in the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
draft supplemental environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519.
553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the
draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may
be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d
1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings,
it is very important that those interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45 day comment period so that
substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest
Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to
them in the final environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft
environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is
also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the
draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft
environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal
and will be available for public inspection.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1909.15, Section 21.
Dated: May 14, 2008.
Lawrence Timchak,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E8-11248 Filed 5-20-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
