Guidance on Disclosure of Policies and Charges Associated With Checked Baggage; Notice, 28854 [E8-11103]
Download as PDF
28854
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 97 / Monday, May 19, 2008 / Notices
evaluate the initial appraisal of a senior
executive’s performance by the
supervisor, along with any
recommendations to the appointing
authority relative to the performance of
the senior executive.
The following have been selected as
acting members of the Performance
Review Board of the U.S. Trade and
Development Agency: Leocadia Zak,
Deputy Director, U.S. Trade and
Development Agency; Geoffrey Jackson,
Director for Policy and Program, U.S.
Trade and Development Agency;
Thomas Hardy, Chief of Staff, U.S.
Trade and Development Agency; James
Wilderotter, General Counsel, U.S.
Trade and Development Agency;
Stephen McLaughlin, Chief Information
Officer, International Trade
Commission; and Jeri Jensen, Managing
Director for Private Sector Initiatives,
Millennium Challenge Corporation.
Dated: May 13, 2008.
Carolyn Hum,
Administrative Officer.
[FR Doc. E8–11181 Filed 5–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8040–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Guidance on Disclosure of Policies
and Charges Associated With Checked
Baggage; Notice
This notice is intended to give
guidance to air carriers and foreign air
carriers on disclosure of carrier baggage
policies and associated fees in
connection with checked baggage. The
general industry practice until recently
has been to allow passengers two free
checked bags, generally of up to 50 or
70 pounds each. Several air carriers
have recently adopted policies of
charging passengers an amount, in
addition to the fare already paid, for any
checked baggage or for more than one
checked bag. Some of these policies
imposing charges for checking a second
bag add $25 to the cost of a passenger’s
trip while others may add far greater
amounts for checking a single bag,
either because it is overweight or
because the carrier has different fares
based on whether a passenger checks
bags and the number he or she checks.
A number of others have announced
plans to implement similar policies.
The Department’s long-standing
policy has been to require carriers to
clearly disclose significant conditions
applicable to air fares. Failure to
disclose such conditions has been
considered an unfair and deceptive
practice and unfair method of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:18 May 16, 2008
Jkt 214001
competition in violation of 49 U.S.C.
41712 and where warranted the
Aviation Enforcement Office has taken
enforcement action against carriers who
engage in such practices. The Aviation
Enforcement Office considers such
significant conditions to include
limiting passengers to fewer than two
free checked bags of the size and weight
that have generally been free on the
carrier in the past and to assessing
passengers a charge in addition to the
air fare for such checked baggage.
Therefore, it is important that carriers
provide prominent and timely notice of
these baggage policies and such charges.
To meet the requirements implicit in
49 U.S.C. 41712 with respect to Internet
advertisements, air carriers and foreign
air carriers should place a notice
regarding the above-described
additional baggage charges on the first
screen in which the carrier offers a fare
quotation of a specific itinerary selected
by a consumer. This notice should
appear if the carrier imposes an
additional baggage charge for one or two
checked bags. The notice may consist of
either (1) an asterisk or similar character
in close proximity to the fare quotation
referring to a statement on the same
screen that ‘‘additional baggage charge
may apply,’’ or (2) a more detailed
summary of the baggage charges on the
same screen as the fare quotation. In
either case, the text should contain a
hyperlink to a full description of the
carrier’s baggage policies.
In print advertisements, an asterisk or
similar character in close proximity to
the fare quotation should refer the
reader to a succinct statement of the
baggage policies and charges. This
statement may appear in typeface
smaller than the rest of the
advertisement and be placed, for
example, along with the summary of
other significant conditions and all fees
and taxes which currently may be
separated out from the base fare.
Furthermore, in order to ensure
compliance with 49 U.S.C. 41712,
airline reservations agents should
disclose these baggage charges and
limitations during telephone or counter
sales prior to completing a sale.
Internet displays and airline agents
should also make clear when the added
charges or revised policies are to take
effect. In no case should more restrictive
baggage policies or additional charges
be applied retroactively to a consumer
who purchased his or her ticket at a
time when the charges did not apply, or
when a lower charge applied. Whatever
the contract of carriage provides
regarding free baggage as of the date of
each ticket sale is binding on the carrier.
The Aviation Enforcement Office
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
considers any carrier practice that
violates its contract of carriage
provisions to constitute an unfair and
deceptive trade practice in violation of
49 U.S.C. 41712.
With respect to fares that are
purchased at the time of an
advertisement for future travel after new
baggage policies and charges are
planned to take effect, carriers should
place a notice on their home Web site
screen highlighting the new policies and
charges. Similar notices should appear
in print advertisements relating to fare
offerings applicable to future travel that
is subject to new baggage policies and
charges.
This disclosure guidance’s
applicability, it should be noted,
extends to ticket agents. Questions
regarding this notice may be addressed
to the Office of Aviation Enforcement
and Proceedings (C–70), U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Ave., SE., Washington, DC
20590.
An electronic version of this
document is available at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Dated: May 13, 2008.
Samuel Podberesky,
Assistant General Counsel for Aviation
Enforcement and Proceedings.
[FR Doc. E8–11103 Filed 5–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statement:
Fresno County, California
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Intent.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FHWA, on behalf of the
California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans), is issuing this notice to
advise the public that a Tier I
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
will be prepared for the State Route 180
Westside Expressway Route Adoption
Study, located in Fresno County,
California.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Trais Norris, Senior Environmental
Planner, Sierra Pacific Environmental
Analysis Branch, Caltrans, 2015 E.
Shields Avenue, Suite 100, Fresno,
California 93726, or call (559) 243–8178.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective
July 1, 2007, the FHWA assigned, and
Caltrans assumed, environmental
responsibilities for this project pursuant
to 23 U.S.C. 327. Caltrans will prepare
a Tier I EIS on a proposal to establish
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 97 (Monday, May 19, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 28854]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-11103]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
Guidance on Disclosure of Policies and Charges Associated With
Checked Baggage; Notice
This notice is intended to give guidance to air carriers and
foreign air carriers on disclosure of carrier baggage policies and
associated fees in connection with checked baggage. The general
industry practice until recently has been to allow passengers two free
checked bags, generally of up to 50 or 70 pounds each. Several air
carriers have recently adopted policies of charging passengers an
amount, in addition to the fare already paid, for any checked baggage
or for more than one checked bag. Some of these policies imposing
charges for checking a second bag add $25 to the cost of a passenger's
trip while others may add far greater amounts for checking a single
bag, either because it is overweight or because the carrier has
different fares based on whether a passenger checks bags and the number
he or she checks. A number of others have announced plans to implement
similar policies.
The Department's long-standing policy has been to require carriers
to clearly disclose significant conditions applicable to air fares.
Failure to disclose such conditions has been considered an unfair and
deceptive practice and unfair method of competition in violation of 49
U.S.C. 41712 and where warranted the Aviation Enforcement Office has
taken enforcement action against carriers who engage in such practices.
The Aviation Enforcement Office considers such significant conditions
to include limiting passengers to fewer than two free checked bags of
the size and weight that have generally been free on the carrier in the
past and to assessing passengers a charge in addition to the air fare
for such checked baggage. Therefore, it is important that carriers
provide prominent and timely notice of these baggage policies and such
charges.
To meet the requirements implicit in 49 U.S.C. 41712 with respect
to Internet advertisements, air carriers and foreign air carriers
should place a notice regarding the above-described additional baggage
charges on the first screen in which the carrier offers a fare
quotation of a specific itinerary selected by a consumer. This notice
should appear if the carrier imposes an additional baggage charge for
one or two checked bags. The notice may consist of either (1) an
asterisk or similar character in close proximity to the fare quotation
referring to a statement on the same screen that ``additional baggage
charge may apply,'' or (2) a more detailed summary of the baggage
charges on the same screen as the fare quotation. In either case, the
text should contain a hyperlink to a full description of the carrier's
baggage policies.
In print advertisements, an asterisk or similar character in close
proximity to the fare quotation should refer the reader to a succinct
statement of the baggage policies and charges. This statement may
appear in typeface smaller than the rest of the advertisement and be
placed, for example, along with the summary of other significant
conditions and all fees and taxes which currently may be separated out
from the base fare. Furthermore, in order to ensure compliance with 49
U.S.C. 41712, airline reservations agents should disclose these baggage
charges and limitations during telephone or counter sales prior to
completing a sale.
Internet displays and airline agents should also make clear when
the added charges or revised policies are to take effect. In no case
should more restrictive baggage policies or additional charges be
applied retroactively to a consumer who purchased his or her ticket at
a time when the charges did not apply, or when a lower charge applied.
Whatever the contract of carriage provides regarding free baggage as of
the date of each ticket sale is binding on the carrier. The Aviation
Enforcement Office considers any carrier practice that violates its
contract of carriage provisions to constitute an unfair and deceptive
trade practice in violation of 49 U.S.C. 41712.
With respect to fares that are purchased at the time of an
advertisement for future travel after new baggage policies and charges
are planned to take effect, carriers should place a notice on their
home Web site screen highlighting the new policies and charges. Similar
notices should appear in print advertisements relating to fare
offerings applicable to future travel that is subject to new baggage
policies and charges.
This disclosure guidance's applicability, it should be noted,
extends to ticket agents. Questions regarding this notice may be
addressed to the Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings (C-70),
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
An electronic version of this document is available at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Dated: May 13, 2008.
Samuel Podberesky,
Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings.
[FR Doc. E8-11103 Filed 5-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P