Guidance on Disclosure of Policies and Charges Associated With Checked Baggage; Notice, 28854 [E8-11103]

Download as PDF 28854 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 97 / Monday, May 19, 2008 / Notices evaluate the initial appraisal of a senior executive’s performance by the supervisor, along with any recommendations to the appointing authority relative to the performance of the senior executive. The following have been selected as acting members of the Performance Review Board of the U.S. Trade and Development Agency: Leocadia Zak, Deputy Director, U.S. Trade and Development Agency; Geoffrey Jackson, Director for Policy and Program, U.S. Trade and Development Agency; Thomas Hardy, Chief of Staff, U.S. Trade and Development Agency; James Wilderotter, General Counsel, U.S. Trade and Development Agency; Stephen McLaughlin, Chief Information Officer, International Trade Commission; and Jeri Jensen, Managing Director for Private Sector Initiatives, Millennium Challenge Corporation. Dated: May 13, 2008. Carolyn Hum, Administrative Officer. [FR Doc. E8–11181 Filed 5–16–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8040–01–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office of the Secretary pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES Guidance on Disclosure of Policies and Charges Associated With Checked Baggage; Notice This notice is intended to give guidance to air carriers and foreign air carriers on disclosure of carrier baggage policies and associated fees in connection with checked baggage. The general industry practice until recently has been to allow passengers two free checked bags, generally of up to 50 or 70 pounds each. Several air carriers have recently adopted policies of charging passengers an amount, in addition to the fare already paid, for any checked baggage or for more than one checked bag. Some of these policies imposing charges for checking a second bag add $25 to the cost of a passenger’s trip while others may add far greater amounts for checking a single bag, either because it is overweight or because the carrier has different fares based on whether a passenger checks bags and the number he or she checks. A number of others have announced plans to implement similar policies. The Department’s long-standing policy has been to require carriers to clearly disclose significant conditions applicable to air fares. Failure to disclose such conditions has been considered an unfair and deceptive practice and unfair method of VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:18 May 16, 2008 Jkt 214001 competition in violation of 49 U.S.C. 41712 and where warranted the Aviation Enforcement Office has taken enforcement action against carriers who engage in such practices. The Aviation Enforcement Office considers such significant conditions to include limiting passengers to fewer than two free checked bags of the size and weight that have generally been free on the carrier in the past and to assessing passengers a charge in addition to the air fare for such checked baggage. Therefore, it is important that carriers provide prominent and timely notice of these baggage policies and such charges. To meet the requirements implicit in 49 U.S.C. 41712 with respect to Internet advertisements, air carriers and foreign air carriers should place a notice regarding the above-described additional baggage charges on the first screen in which the carrier offers a fare quotation of a specific itinerary selected by a consumer. This notice should appear if the carrier imposes an additional baggage charge for one or two checked bags. The notice may consist of either (1) an asterisk or similar character in close proximity to the fare quotation referring to a statement on the same screen that ‘‘additional baggage charge may apply,’’ or (2) a more detailed summary of the baggage charges on the same screen as the fare quotation. In either case, the text should contain a hyperlink to a full description of the carrier’s baggage policies. In print advertisements, an asterisk or similar character in close proximity to the fare quotation should refer the reader to a succinct statement of the baggage policies and charges. This statement may appear in typeface smaller than the rest of the advertisement and be placed, for example, along with the summary of other significant conditions and all fees and taxes which currently may be separated out from the base fare. Furthermore, in order to ensure compliance with 49 U.S.C. 41712, airline reservations agents should disclose these baggage charges and limitations during telephone or counter sales prior to completing a sale. Internet displays and airline agents should also make clear when the added charges or revised policies are to take effect. In no case should more restrictive baggage policies or additional charges be applied retroactively to a consumer who purchased his or her ticket at a time when the charges did not apply, or when a lower charge applied. Whatever the contract of carriage provides regarding free baggage as of the date of each ticket sale is binding on the carrier. The Aviation Enforcement Office PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 considers any carrier practice that violates its contract of carriage provisions to constitute an unfair and deceptive trade practice in violation of 49 U.S.C. 41712. With respect to fares that are purchased at the time of an advertisement for future travel after new baggage policies and charges are planned to take effect, carriers should place a notice on their home Web site screen highlighting the new policies and charges. Similar notices should appear in print advertisements relating to fare offerings applicable to future travel that is subject to new baggage policies and charges. This disclosure guidance’s applicability, it should be noted, extends to ticket agents. Questions regarding this notice may be addressed to the Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings (C–70), U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Washington, DC 20590. An electronic version of this document is available at https:// www.regulations.gov. Dated: May 13, 2008. Samuel Podberesky, Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings. [FR Doc. E8–11103 Filed 5–16–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration Environmental Impact Statement: Fresno County, California Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of Intent. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The FHWA, on behalf of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), is issuing this notice to advise the public that a Tier I Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared for the State Route 180 Westside Expressway Route Adoption Study, located in Fresno County, California. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Trais Norris, Senior Environmental Planner, Sierra Pacific Environmental Analysis Branch, Caltrans, 2015 E. Shields Avenue, Suite 100, Fresno, California 93726, or call (559) 243–8178. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective July 1, 2007, the FHWA assigned, and Caltrans assumed, environmental responsibilities for this project pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327. Caltrans will prepare a Tier I EIS on a proposal to establish E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM 19MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 97 (Monday, May 19, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 28854]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-11103]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Guidance on Disclosure of Policies and Charges Associated With 
Checked Baggage; Notice

    This notice is intended to give guidance to air carriers and 
foreign air carriers on disclosure of carrier baggage policies and 
associated fees in connection with checked baggage. The general 
industry practice until recently has been to allow passengers two free 
checked bags, generally of up to 50 or 70 pounds each. Several air 
carriers have recently adopted policies of charging passengers an 
amount, in addition to the fare already paid, for any checked baggage 
or for more than one checked bag. Some of these policies imposing 
charges for checking a second bag add $25 to the cost of a passenger's 
trip while others may add far greater amounts for checking a single 
bag, either because it is overweight or because the carrier has 
different fares based on whether a passenger checks bags and the number 
he or she checks. A number of others have announced plans to implement 
similar policies.
    The Department's long-standing policy has been to require carriers 
to clearly disclose significant conditions applicable to air fares. 
Failure to disclose such conditions has been considered an unfair and 
deceptive practice and unfair method of competition in violation of 49 
U.S.C. 41712 and where warranted the Aviation Enforcement Office has 
taken enforcement action against carriers who engage in such practices. 
The Aviation Enforcement Office considers such significant conditions 
to include limiting passengers to fewer than two free checked bags of 
the size and weight that have generally been free on the carrier in the 
past and to assessing passengers a charge in addition to the air fare 
for such checked baggage. Therefore, it is important that carriers 
provide prominent and timely notice of these baggage policies and such 
charges.
    To meet the requirements implicit in 49 U.S.C. 41712 with respect 
to Internet advertisements, air carriers and foreign air carriers 
should place a notice regarding the above-described additional baggage 
charges on the first screen in which the carrier offers a fare 
quotation of a specific itinerary selected by a consumer. This notice 
should appear if the carrier imposes an additional baggage charge for 
one or two checked bags. The notice may consist of either (1) an 
asterisk or similar character in close proximity to the fare quotation 
referring to a statement on the same screen that ``additional baggage 
charge may apply,'' or (2) a more detailed summary of the baggage 
charges on the same screen as the fare quotation. In either case, the 
text should contain a hyperlink to a full description of the carrier's 
baggage policies.
    In print advertisements, an asterisk or similar character in close 
proximity to the fare quotation should refer the reader to a succinct 
statement of the baggage policies and charges. This statement may 
appear in typeface smaller than the rest of the advertisement and be 
placed, for example, along with the summary of other significant 
conditions and all fees and taxes which currently may be separated out 
from the base fare. Furthermore, in order to ensure compliance with 49 
U.S.C. 41712, airline reservations agents should disclose these baggage 
charges and limitations during telephone or counter sales prior to 
completing a sale.
    Internet displays and airline agents should also make clear when 
the added charges or revised policies are to take effect. In no case 
should more restrictive baggage policies or additional charges be 
applied retroactively to a consumer who purchased his or her ticket at 
a time when the charges did not apply, or when a lower charge applied. 
Whatever the contract of carriage provides regarding free baggage as of 
the date of each ticket sale is binding on the carrier. The Aviation 
Enforcement Office considers any carrier practice that violates its 
contract of carriage provisions to constitute an unfair and deceptive 
trade practice in violation of 49 U.S.C. 41712.
    With respect to fares that are purchased at the time of an 
advertisement for future travel after new baggage policies and charges 
are planned to take effect, carriers should place a notice on their 
home Web site screen highlighting the new policies and charges. Similar 
notices should appear in print advertisements relating to fare 
offerings applicable to future travel that is subject to new baggage 
policies and charges.
    This disclosure guidance's applicability, it should be noted, 
extends to ticket agents. Questions regarding this notice may be 
addressed to the Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings (C-70), 
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., 
Washington, DC 20590.
    An electronic version of this document is available at https://
www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: May 13, 2008.
Samuel Podberesky,
Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings.
[FR Doc. E8-11103 Filed 5-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.