Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Removal of Erigeron maguirei From the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Plants; Availability of Post-Delisting Monitoring Plan, 28410-28423 [E8-9282]
Download as PDF
28410
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
including this paragraph (d), in subcontracts
that have a value in excess of $5,000,000 and
a performance period of more than 120 days.
(2) In altering this clause to identify the
appropriate parties, all reports of violation of
the civil False Claims Act or violation of
Federal criminal law shall be directed to the
agency Office of the Inspector General, with
a copy to the Contracting Officer.
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. E8–11137 Filed 5–15–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[FWS–R6–ES–2008–0001; 92220–1113–
0000–C6]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Proposed Removal of
Erigeron maguirei From the Federal
List of Endangered and Threatened
Plants; Availability of Post-Delisting
Monitoring Plan
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of
availability.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.),
propose to remove the plant Erigeron
maguirei (commonly referred to as
Maguire daisy) from the List of
Endangered and Threatened Plants. The
best scientific and commercial data
available indicate that this species has
recovered and no longer meets the
definition of threatened or endangered
under the Act. Our review of the status
of this species shows that populations
are stable, threats have been addressed,
and adequate regulatory mechanisms
ensure the species is not currently and
is not likely to again become an
endangered species within the
foreseeable future in all or a significant
portion of its range. We seek
information, data, and comments from
the public regarding E. maguirei, this
proposal to delist, and the Post-Delisting
Monitoring Plan. This proposed rule
completes the 5-year status review
initiated on April 7, 2006 (71 FR 17900).
DATES: We will accept comments
received or postmarked on or before July
15, 2008. Public hearing requests must
be received by June 30, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by one of the following methods:
16:08 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
identifying information—will be posted
on the Web site. If you submit a
hardcopy comment that includes
personal identifying information, you
may request at the top of your document
that we withhold this information from
public review. However, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
We will post all hardcopy comments on
https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments and materials we receive,
as well as supporting documentation we
used in preparing this proposed rule,
will be available for public inspection
on https://www.regulations.gov, or by
appointment during normal business
hours at the Utah Field Office, 2369
West Orton Circle, West Valley City, UT
84119 (801/975–3330).
Public Comments Solicited
RIN 1018–AU67
VerDate Aug<31>2005
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public
Comments Processing, Attn: RIN 1018–
AU67; Division of Policy and Directives
Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite
222; Arlington, VA 22203.
We will not accept e-mail or faxes. We
will post all comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal
information you provide us (see the
Public Comments section below for
more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Larry Crist, Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Utah Field Office,
2369 West Orton Circle, West Valley
City, UT 84119, or telephone (801) 975–
3330. Individuals who are hearingimpaired or speech-impaired may call
the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–
8337 for TTY assistance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Hearing
The Act provides for one or more
public hearings on this proposal, if
requested. Requests must be received by
June 30, 2008. Such requests must be
made in writing and addressed to the
Field Supervisor (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section).
We intend that any final action
resulting from this proposal will be as
accurate and as effective as possible.
Therefore, we hereby request data,
comments, new information, or
suggestions from the public, other
concerned governmental agencies, the
scientific community, Tribes, industry,
or any other interested party concerning
this proposed rule. We particularly seek
comments concerning:
(1) Biological information concerning
this species;
(2) Relevant data concerning any
current or likely future threats (or lack
thereof) to this species, including the
extent and adequacy of Federal and
State protection and management that
would be provided to the Erigeron
maguirei as a delisted species;
(3) Additional information concerning
the range, distribution, population size,
and population trends of this species,
including the locations of any
additional populations of this species;
(4) Current or planned activities in the
subject area and their possible impacts
on this species; and
(5) Our draft Post-Delisting
Monitoring Plan.
You may submit your comments and
materials concerning this proposed rule
by one of the methods listed in the
ADDRESSES section. We will not accept
comments sent by e-mail or fax or to an
address not listed in the ADDRESSES
section.
If you submit a comment via https://
www.regulations.gov, your entire
comment—including any personal
Previous Federal Action
Section 12 of the Act directed the
Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution
to prepare a report on those plants
considered to be endangered,
threatened, or extinct. On July 1, 1975,
the Service published a notice in the
Federal Register (40 FR 27824)
accepting the Smithsonian report as a
petition to list taxa named therein under
section 4(c)(2) (now 4(b)(3)) of the Act)
and announced our intention to review
the status of those plants. Erigeron
maguirei was included in that report (40
FR 27880, July 1, 1975). Maguire daisy
is the common name for Erigeron
maguirei, however we will use
primarily the scientific name of this
species throughout this proposed rule to
clarify taxonomic issues or the legal
status of the plant.
On June 16, 1976, we published a rule
in the Federal Register (41 FR 24524) to
designate approximately 1,700 vascular
plant species, including Erigeron
maguirei, as endangered pursuant to
section 4 of the Act. The 1978
amendments to the Act required that all
proposals over 2 years old be
withdrawn. On December 10, 1979, we
published a notice of withdrawal (44 FR
70796) of that portion of the June 16,
1976, proposal that had not been made
final, which included E maguirei.
On December 15, 1980, we published
a revised notice of review for native
plants in the Federal Register
designating Erigeron maguirei as a
candidate species (45 FR 82480).
Section 4(b)(3)(B) of the 1982
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
amendments to the Act required that the
Secretary of the Interior make a finding
on a petition within 1 year of its receipt.
In addition, section 2(b)(1) of the 1982
amendments to the Act required that all
petitions pending as of October 13,
1982, be treated as if newly submitted
on that date. Since the 1975
Smithsonian report was accepted as a
petition, all the taxa contained in those
notices, including E. maguirei, were
treated as being newly petitioned as of
October 13, 1982. On October 13, 1983,
the Service made a 12-month finding
that the petition to list E. maguirei var.
maguirei was warranted but precluded
by other listing actions of a higher
priority. Notification of this finding was
published in the Federal Register on
November 28, 1983 (48 FR 53640).
On July 27, 1984, the Service
published a proposed rule to designate
Erigeron maguirei var. maguirei as an
endangered species (49 FR 30211). The
final rule designating the variety of the
species as endangered was published on
September 5, 1985 (50 FR 36089).
In 1983, E. maguirei var. harrisonii
was described as a separate variety of E.
maguirei. In this description, Welsh
(1983a, p. 367) noted two previous
collections of the variety at canyon
bottom sites in Wayne County, Utah, in
the 1930s. On September 27, 1985, the
Service published a notice of review for
plants (50 FR 39526) which included
Erigeron maguirei var. harrisonii as a
candidate species (50 FR 39548).
Erigeron maguirei var. harrisonii
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
remained as a candidate through the
revised plant notice of review published
on September 30, 1993 (58 FR 51144).
On September 7, 1994 (59 FR 46219),
the Service proposed to reclassify the
species from endangered to threatened
based on the new genetic information
that led to a taxonomic revision,
changing the entry for Erigeron maguirei
var. maguirei to E. maguirei. The
proposed rule noted that this entity also
included the plant variety formerly
known as E. m. var harrisonii.
On June 19, 1996, the Service
finalized the rule reclassifying Maguire
daisy from endangered to threatened in
large part due to a taxonomic revision
and resultant increase in the population
considered as Erigeron maguirei (61 FR
31054).
Species Information
A member of the sunflower family,
Erigeron maguirei is a perennial herb
with a branched woody base. Its stems
and spatulate-shaped leaves are densely
spreading and hairy. Its flowers are
dime sized with white or pink petals.
Bits of sand commonly cling to the hairs
of the leaves and stems. The species is
further described in our June 19, 1996,
final rule reclassifying the species as
threatened (61 FR 31054).
Erigeron maguirei has been located
from 1,585 to 2,621 meters (m) (5,200 to
8,600 feet (ft)) in elevation (Clark et al.
2006, pp. 9–11). Highest plant densities
occur on mesa tops between 1,829 and
2,134 m (6,000 and 7,000 ft) in elevation
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28411
(Kass 1990, p. 27; Service 1995, p. 2;
Clark 2001, p. 15; Clark et al. 2006, p.
14).
The species occurs from the San
Rafael Swell in Emery County, Utah,
south into Wayne and Garfield
Counties, Utah, through the
Waterpocket Fold in Capitol Reef
National Park (Capitol Reef) (Heil 1987,
p. 5, figure 5; Heil 1989, p. 26; Kass
1990, pp. 23, 26–27; Harper and Van
Buren 1998, appendix A; Clark 2001, p.
3; Clark 2002, pp. 13–14; Clark et al.
2005, p. 7; Clark et al. 2006, p. 7) (see
Figure 1). Erigeron maguirei occurs
primarily on the Navajo Sandstone
formation. Individuals have been
located within steep, narrow, dry, rocky,
and sandy canyon or wash bottoms of
the Wingate, Chinle, and Navajo
Sandstone formations; sandstone walls
of the Wingate, Navajo, and Cutler
formations; cracks of large boulders;
slickrock; and atop mesas of the Navajo
Sandstone formation (Cronquist 1947, p.
165; Anderson 1982, pp. 1–2; Heil 1989,
pp. 25–26; Kass 1990, p. 22; Harper and
Van Buren 1998, p. 1). Populations
within canyon bottoms are apparently
established from seeds dispersed by
wind or overland flow from source
populations on the mesa tops (Heil
1989, p. 25; Kass 1990, p. 27; Service
1995, p. 2). These canyon populations
are generally small compared with those
on the mesa tops (Heil 1989, p. 25; Kass
1990, p. 27; Service 1995, p. 2).
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
28412
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 4310–55–C
Erigeron maguirei has been found
primarily in the Dwarf Mountain
Mahogany Slickrock plant community, a
community endemic to the Colorado
Plateau Region (Heil 1989, p. 23; Clark
2001, pp. 15–16; Clark et al. 2006, p.
15). E. maguirei also is associated with
pinyon/juniper—tall shrub, ponderosa
pine—tall shrub slickrock pockets,
mesic canyon bottoms, mountain shrub,
and intermittent riparian communities
(Kass 1990, p. 22; Harper and Van Buren
1998, p. 1; Clark 2002, pp. 15–16; Clark
et al. 2005, p. 7; Clark et al. 2006, p. 15).
Flowering occurs from May to June
and takes 4 to 6 weeks to go from the
small green ‘‘button’’ bud stage to
completion of anthesis, when the flower
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
is no longer open and functional (Alston
and Tepedino 2005, p. 54; Clark et al.
2006, p. 17). It appears that Erigeron
maguirei lacks self-compatibility, and
that pollinators are necessary for cross
pollination to occur (Alston and
Tepedino 2005, p. 61). Because of the
open nature of the flower head, E.
maguirei tends to be visited by
opportunistic insects searching for
nectar (Alston and Tepedino 2005, p.
60). Pollinators include various flies,
wasps, and bees (Alston and Tepedino
2005, p. 60).
Van Buren and Harper (2002, p. 1)
collected demographic data on three
Erigeron maguirei populations for a
period of 9 years. The demographic data
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
collected included plant diameter, size
class, plant height, plant condition, and
number of flower heads produced for
individual tagged plants (Van Buren and
Harper 2002, p. 2). At the Eagle Canyon
study site, 124 plants were tagged in
1992 and 41 of these were still alive in
2001 (Van Buren and Harper 2002, pp.
2–3). This demographic monitoring
study suggests the species is long lived,
has a low mortality rate, and has the
ability to replace individuals at a rate
that compensates for mortality (Van
Buren and Harper 2002, pp. 2–5).
Overall, monitored populations appear
stable (Van Buren and Harper 2002, p.
2).
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
EP16MY08.017
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Department of Agriculture Forest
Service (Forest Service), and the
Recovery plans are not regulatory
National Park Service (NPS) established
documents and are instead intended to
an Interagency Rare Plant Agreement to
provide guidance to the Service, States,
direct conservation measures for listed
and other partners on methods of
and sensitive plant species endemic to
minimizing threats to listed species and
central Utah, including Erigeron
on criteria that may be used to
maguirei (Clark 2002, p. 3). Through
determine when recovery is achieved.
this interagency agreement, the agencies
There are many paths to accomplishing
committed funding to survey and
recovery of a species, and recovery may
monitor E. maguirei throughout its
be achieved without all criteria being
range, regardless of agency boundaries
fully met. For example, one or more
(Clark 2002, p. 3). Beginning in 1999,
criteria may have been exceeded while
these agencies hired an Interagency
other criteria may not have been
Botanist to oversee a team of seasonal
accomplished. In that instance, the
employees, thus creating an Interagency
Service may judge that the threats have
Rare Plant Team (Forest Service et al.
been minimized sufficiently, and the
2006, p. 6). As part of recovery activities
species is robust enough to reclassify
for the E. maguirei, from 1999 to 2002,
from endangered to threatened or to
approximately 3,521 hectares (8,700
delist. In other cases, recovery
acres) were surveyed for E. maguirei on
opportunities may have been recognized NPS, BLM, and Forest Service lands
that were not known at the time the
(Clark and Clark 1999, p. 45; Clark 2002,
recovery plan was finalized. These
p. 13). During this period,
opportunities may be used instead of
approximately 2,445 person-hours were
methods identified in the recovery plan. allocated by the Interagency Rare Plant
Likewise, information on the species
Team for E. maguirei surveys (Clark
may be learned that was not known at
2002, p. 13).
the time the recovery plan was
The recovery criterion of maintaining
finalized. The new information may
20 viable populations was based
change the extent that criteria need to be primarily on the assumption that
met for recognizing recovery of the
numerous small sites would remain
species. Recovery of a species is a
scattered and disconnected (Clark
dynamic process requiring adaptive
2006c). Instead of identifying more
management that may, or may not, fully populations, increased survey efforts
follow the guidance provided in a
conducted under Action 2.0 in the
recovery plan.
Recovery Plan identified both broader
The Maguire Daisy (Erigeron
plant distributions and larger
maguirei) Recovery Plan was approved
population sizes that are evenly
by the Service on August 15, 1995. The
distributed across the landscape (Harper
Recovery Plan outlined three delisting
and Van Buren 1998, p. 2; Clark and
criteria. These criteria, and the status of Clark 1999, p. 47; Clark 2001, p. 3; Clark
the species relative to these criteria, are
2002, pp. 13–14; Clark et al. 2005, p. 17;
outlined below.
Clark et al. 2006, p. 17). Based on our
Delisting Criterion One—Locate and/
current knowledge of the species, 9
or establish additional populations.
known populations exist (118 sites)
Maintain 20 populations which have
within 4 meta-populations comprised of
been demonstrated to be above
approximately 164,250 Erigeron
minimum viable population levels. Until maguirei individuals (see Figure 1 and
minimum viable population levels are
Table 1) (Clark et al. 2006, p. 16). Sites
determined, it is assumed that the
are defined as occurrence locations
minimum viable population level will be recorded by one or more researcher over
about 500 individuals (Service 1995, p.
time (Clark 2006b, p. 5). Populations are
ii). At the time the Recovery Plan was
defined as groups of occurrence records
written, the species was known from 7
(i.e., sites) located in the same
populations (32 sites) with the total
geographic vicinity (Clark 2006b, p. 5).
population estimated at 5,000 (Service
A meta-population is comprised of a
1995, p. 2). To achieve this criterion, the number of individual populations less
Recovery Plan recommended land
than 2.4 kilometers (1.5 miles) apart,
managers inventory suitable habitat to
typically linked by continuous suitable
determine with a reasonable degree of
habitat (Clark 2006b, p. 5, Clark 2006c).
accuracy its population and distribution The populations cannot be split into
(Service 1995, pp. ii, 6, 7, 12).
more than nine separate populations
Thus, in 1999, the Service, the Bureau based on any meaningful criteria (Clark
2006c).
of Land Management (BLM), U.S.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Recovery
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28413
The range of the species is currently
estimated at approximately 1,010 square
kilometers (km) (390 square miles (mi))
and extends from the San Rafael Swell
south through the Waterpocket Fold of
Capitol Reef (see Figure 1) (Clark et al.
2006, p. 17). All three populations
within the Capitol Reef Meta-Population
are linked by contiguous suitable
habitat. Although not necessary for
recovery, Clark et al. (2006, p. 24)
postulated that further survey work
would likely find sufficient numbers of
plants to link them into one contiguous
population. A similar situation exists
within the San Rafael Swell area where
suitable habitat occurrences are
separated by short distances (Clark et al.
2006, p. 24).
These large, connected, and evenly
distributed populations provide the
desired viability intended by the
recovery plan. The 9 populations have
more desirable biological attributes than
the originally suggested 20 populations
in the recovery plan. As mentioned
above, the need for 20 populations was
based on the assumption that the
originally identified localities would
remain widely scattered and the
populations in those localities would
remain small. However, the 9 current
populations are well connected within 4
meta-populations, the meta-populations
are distributed throughout the range of
the species, and most of the populations
within those meta-populations have
large numbers of individuals. In fact,
most of the populations are well above
the minimum viable population size of
500 (see Table 1). Although some of the
individual populations are below the
minimum viable population size, those
populations are connected to other
populations within meta-populations,
thereby increasing the species’
robustness. In addition, recent
population dynamics studies confirm
the species’ projected population
stability (Van Buren and Harper 2002,
pp. 1–5; Clark et al. 2006, p. 24).
Demographic monitoring data suggests
the species is long lived, has a low
mortality rate, and has the ability to
replace individuals at a rate that
compensates for mortality (Van Buren
and Harper 2002, pp. 2–5). The 9
current populations are functionally
better than the estimated 20 populations
originally identified in the recovery
plan. Therefore, on the whole, the
available data demonstrate that the
intent of this recovery criterion has been
met or exceeded.
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
28414
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1.—ERIGERON MAGUIREI POPULATIONS, POPULATION ESTIMATES AND PROTECTIVE LAND MANAGEMENT
DESIGNATIONS
Population
Population
estimate
Number of
sites
Land ownership **
Protective designations **
Percent of
the species’
range within
the protective designation
Northern San Rafael Swell Meta-Population
Calf Canyon * .............................
2,000
1
2
BLM ..........................................
SITLA ........................................
ACEC ........................................
None .........................................
95
0
WSA ..........................................
ACEC ........................................
WSA ..........................................
ACEC ........................................
None .........................................
None .........................................
None .........................................
90
100
90
100
0
0
0
WSA ..........................................
ACEC ........................................
WSA ..........................................
ACEC ........................................
100
10
50
20
Central San Rafael Swell Meta-Population
Coal Wash .................................
100
6
BLM ..........................................
Secret Mesa ..............................
9,000
9
BLM ..........................................
Link Flats ...................................
1,000
200
50
2
4
1
SITLA ........................................
BLM ..........................................
SITLA ........................................
Southern San Rafael Swell Meta-Population
John’s Hole ................................
300
3
BLM ..........................................
Seger’s Hole ..............................
100
2
BLM ..........................................
Capitol Reef Meta-Population
Deep Creek ...............................
1,500
100,000
2
29
Forest Service ..........................
NPS ..........................................
Capitol Reef ...............................
30,000
15
NPS ..........................................
Waterpocket Fold ......................
20,000
42
NPS ..........................................
Totals ..................................
164,250
118
Various ......................................
Proposed Botanical Area ..........
Primitive and Threshold Management Zone.
Primitive and Threshold Management Zone.
Primitive and Threshold Management Zone.
Various ......................................
1
100
100
100
97
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
* The Calf Canyon population estimate is from 1980. Due to inaccessibility, this site has not been revisited since 1980 and current population
levels are unknown. However, other populations are doing well and there is no reason to believe that the Calf Canyon population is not also
doing well (Clark 2007a). Current distribution among BLM and SITLA is also unknown although 1980 estimates suggest 25 percent of the range
was on BLM land and 75 percent was on SITLA land.
** SITLA = Utah’s School of Public Land Trust; ACEC = Area of Critical Environmental Concern; WSA = Wilderness Study Area.
1 0% (will be 100% if proposed Botanical Area is finalized).
Delisting Criterion Two—Establish
formal land management designations
for these populations which provide
long-term, undisturbed habitat for
Maguire daisy (Service 1995, p. ii).
Delisting Criterion Three—Ensure that
Maguire daisy and its habitat is
protected from loss of individuals and
environmental degradation (Service
1995, p. ii). To achieve these criteria, the
Recovery Plan recommends the Service
and our partners ‘‘document the
presence of, or, if necessary, establish
formal land management designations
which would provide for long-term
protection for Maguire daisy and its
habitat’’ (Service 1995, pp. ii, 6, 9, 12).
Approximately 97 percent of the
species’ range occurs on lands with
substantial protective measures in place
(see Table 1). Protections are afforded to
populations occurring in Capitol Reef
through the NPS General Management
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
Plan (Capitol Reef 1998, pp. 27–31). The
BLM provides protections for
populations occurring on their lands
under the 1991 San Rafael Resource
Management Plan (BLM 1991a, pp. 12–
26, 63–64). Most of the habitat on BLM
land is protected as Wilderness Study
Areas or Areas of Critical Environmental
Concern (see Factor D below). The BLM
Price Field Office is currently
proceeding with a revision of the 1991
Resource Management Plan (BLM 2004).
The Record of Decision for the Final
Resource Management Plan is
scheduled to be completed by the
summer of 2008 (BLM 2008a, p. 1). The
Dixie National Forest and Fishlake
National Forest released a draft Land
Management Plan identifying the
Billings Pass Botanical Area, which
would provide protection to Erigeron
maguirei (Forest Service 2006a, pp. 2c–
17, 2c–18, 2c–43; Tait 2006). At the time
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
of this proposed rule, a schedule was
not available for the completion of this
document. The Fishlake National Forest
Off-Highway Vehicle Route Designation
Project (Forest Service 2006b, pp. 13,
20–21) will eliminate cross country
travel on Forest Service lands
throughout the range of the species; all
habitat is a minimum of 0.8 km (0.5 mi)
from existing or potential motorized
routes on Fishlake National Forest lands
(Forest Service 2006c, pp. 123, 260–
263).
The Utah State School and
Institutional Trust Lands (SITLA) owns
lands that contain less than 2 percent of
all known or estimated Erigeron
maguirei plants. While SITLA does not
have a specific management plan to
benefit E. maguirei, we do not believe
this is necessary to achieve the recovery
criterion.
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Since its 1985 listing, Federal land
management agencies have worked
collaboratively to ensure long-term
protection of Erigeron maguirei and its
habitat. Land management plans,
policies, and regulations that provide
protection to E. maguirei are in place.
More information regarding the
protection of E. maguirei through land
management designations is contained
within Factor D of the Summary of
Factors Affecting the Species.
To further ensure these efforts
continue post-delisting, the Interagency
Rare Plant Team has developed the
Central Utah Navajo Sandstone
Endemics Conservation Agreement and
Conservation Strategy (hereafter referred
to as the Conservation Strategy), a multiyear joint project by the Forest Service,
BLM, NPS, and the Service (Forest
Service et al. 2006). We believe the
Conservation Strategy will ensure
conservation efforts that have occurred
for the species since formation of the
Interagency Rare Plant Team in 1999
will continue. The Conservation
Strategy, signed by the Forest Service,
BLM, NPS, and the Service in
September 2006, outlines the procedural
provisions under which the Federal
agencies will manage Erigeron maguirei
into the foreseeable future (Forest
Service et al. 2006, pp. 24–25). In
addition, the Conservation Strategy
documents the conservation actions
needed to manage potential factors
impacting the species and to promote
the conservation and perpetuation of E.
maguirei (Forest Service et al. 2006, pp.
38–47). The Conservation Strategy can
be viewed in its entirety at: https://
mountain-prairie.fws.gov/species/
plants/maguiredaisy/. Copies can also
be obtained from the Utah field office
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Based on the best available data, we
have determined that the intent of the
first criterion has been achieved and the
second and third recovery criterion have
been met. Current estimates suggest
approximately 97 percent of all known
individuals occur on lands with formal
land management designations that
provide for the long-term protection of
the habitat. This ensures Erigeron
maguirei and its habitat are protected
from loss of individuals and
environmental degradation.
Summary of Factors Affecting the
Species
Section 4 of the Act and its
implementing regulations (50 CFR part
424) set forth the procedures for listing
species, reclassifying species, or
removing species from listed status.
‘‘Species’’ is defined by the Act as
including any species or subspecies of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
fish or wildlife or plants, and any
distinct vertebrate population segment
of fish or wildlife that interbreeds when
mature (16 U.S.C. 1532(16)). Once the
‘‘species’’ is determined we then
evaluate whether that species may be
endangered or threatened because of
one or more of the five factors described
in section 4(a)(1) of the Act. We must
consider these same five factors in
delisting a species. We may delist a
species according to 50 CFR 424.11(d) if
the best available scientific and
commercial data indicate that the
species is neither endangered nor
threatened for the following reasons: (1)
The species is extinct; (2) the species
has recovered and is no longer
endangered or threatened (as is the case
with the Maguire daisy); and/or (3) the
original scientific data used at the time
the species was classified were in error.
A recovered species is one that no
longer meets the Act’s definition of
threatened or endangered. Determining
whether a species is recovered requires
consideration of the same five categories
of threats specified in section 4(a)(1) of
the Act. For species that are already
listed as threatened or endangered, this
analysis of threats is an evaluation of
both the threats currently facing the
species and the threats that are
reasonably likely to affect the species in
the foreseeable future following the
delisting or downlisting and the
removal or reduction of the Act’s
protections.
A species is ‘‘endangered’’ for
purposes of the Act if it is in danger of
extinction throughout all or a
‘‘significant portion of its range’’ and is
‘‘threatened’’ if it is likely to become
endangered within the foreseeable
future throughout all or a ‘‘significant
portion of its range.’’ The word ‘‘range’’
in the significant portion of its range
(SPR) phrase refers to the range in
which the species currently exists. For
the purposes of this analysis, we will
evaluate whether the currently listed
species, the Erigeron maguirei, should
be considered threatened or endangered.
Then we will consider whether there are
any portions of the species’ range in
danger of extinction or likely to become
endangered within the foreseeable
future.
Foreseeable future is determined by
the Service on a case-by-case basis,
taking into account a variety of speciesspecific factors such as lifespan,
genetics, breeding behavior,
demography, threat-projection
timeframes, and environmental
variability. In this case, we do not
foresee any significant changes in the
level of threats for Erigeron maguirei.
Land management designations
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28415
(described below) provide long-term
security for approximately 97 percent of
known plants. Other factors once
thought capable of significantly
impacting the species are now predicted
to have little or no impact on the
species’ long-term conservation status.
While we could consider the species
secure in perpetuity, such a timeframe
would introduce an unreasonable level
of uncertainty into our analysis.
Therefore, for the purpose of our
analysis, we consider a timeframe over
which it would be reasonable to expect
population level or demographic effects
to be detected. For the purposes of this
proposed rule, we consider ‘‘foreseeable
future’’ for E. maguirei to be up to 30
years. The species has been shown to
live past 9 years of age and may live
between 20 and 30 years (Van Buren
and Harper 2002, appendices; England
2007). The available data also
demonstrate that plants may begin
flowering as early as 1 year and may be
able to replace themselves within as
little as 2 years, depending upon
conditions (Van Buren and Harper 2002,
appendices). Consideration of factors
potentially impacting the species for up
to 30 years would incorporate the long
life of an individual and allow for up to
15 possible generations. We believe this
represents a reasonable biological
timeframe to measure demographic
changes that could reflect potential
threat factors.
The following analysis examines all
five factors currently affecting, or that
are likely to affect, Erigeron maguirei
within the foreseeable future.
A. The Present or Threatened
Destruction, Modification, or
Curtailment of its Habitat or Range
The current range of Erigeron
maguirei includes 9 populations (118
sites) within 4 meta-populations across
approximately 1,010 square km (390
square mi) of southeastern Utah. These
populations extend from the San Rafael
Swell south through the Waterpocket
Fold of Capitol Reef (see Figure 1) (Clark
et al. 2006, p. 17). The three largest
populations, including over 91 percent
of all known plants, occur primarily
within Capitol Reef. One of these three
populations (Deep Creek) also includes
a small portion, less than 1 percent of
all the known plants, on National Forest
lands. The other six populations (Calf
Canyon, Coal Wash, Secret Mesa, Link
Flats, John’s Hole, and Seger’s Hole) are
managed primarily by the BLM. A
portion of three of these six populations
(Calf Canyon, Secret Mesa, and Link
Flats) also occurs on Utah’s School of
Public Land Trust (SITLA) lands. Table
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
28416
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
1 provides further detail on populations
and land ownership.
When the species was originally
listed, the main threat was loss of
habitat specifically due to mining
claims for uranium, energy exploration,
grazing, and off-road vehicle recreation
(50 FR 36089–36091, September 5,
1985). In addition, flooding has also
been seen as a potential threat in the
recent years. We address these threats to
Erigeron maguirei below.
Mineral Exploration and Development
Overview—Mineral exploration and
development were listed as threats in
the 1985 listing, in the 1995 Recovery
Plan, and in the 1996 downlisting (50
FR 36089, September 5, 1985; Service
1995, p. 5; 61 FR 31054, 31056, June 19,
1996). Only one active mine exists
within the range of Erigeron maguirei
populations according to the Utah
Mineral Occurrence System (Utah
Geological Survey (UGS) 2007; Clark et
al. 2006, p. 9). This mine, the Lucky
Strike Mine, is discussed below.
Uranium—Uranium mining began in
the western United States in 1871
(Ringholz 1994, p. 2). In 1952, geologist
Charles Steen found the first noteworthy
deposits of uranium ore in Utah
(Ringholz 1994, p. 2). By the end of
1962, Utah had produced approximately
9 million tons of ore (Ringholz 1994, p.
2). The Atomic Energy Commission held
ample uranium ore reserves and by 1970
stopped buying uranium (Ringholz
1994, p. 3). When nuclear power plants
came on-line in the mid-1970s, a brief
second boom was experienced
(Ringholz 1994, p. 3). However, foreign
competition, Federal regulations, and
nuclear fears led to an abandonment of
domestic uranium mining (Ringholz
1994, p. 3). A recent surge in prices has
led to a resurgence in prospectors
staking and buying up uranium claims.
According to the Utah Mineral
Occurrence System database, 12 known
uranium mineral locations overlap the
mapped Erigeron maguirei populations
(UGS 2007; Clark et al. 2006, p. 16).
Only the Lucky Strike Mine is active
(UGS 2007). This mine occurs along the
southern edge of the mapped Link Flats
population (Central San Rafael Swell
Meta-Population) and is accessed via an
existing road that enters the population
from the south (UGS 2007; Clark et al.
2006, p. 9). It is not anticipated that the
mine will adversely impact substantial
portions of this population in the
foreseeable future as it lies on the
periphery of the population and is
accessed via an existing road. The
remaining 11 locations include 6 sites
that never produced and 5 sites that
only reached small production levels
(UGS 2007). All 11 of these locations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
occur on the periphery of the mapped
populations (UGS 2007; Clark et al.
2006, p. 16).
Uranium is restricted to geologic
formations such as the Moss Back
Member, Monitor Butte Member, and
the Mottled Siltstone Unit of the Chinle
Formation, while the Maguire daisy
primarily occurs in the Navajo
Sandstone geologic formation. The most
substantial impact of uranium mining
would likely be indirectly from crossing
suitable habitat while accessing the
desired geologic formation (Utah
Geologic Survey (UGS) 2007; Clark et al.
2006, p. 20). Based on the locations of
past exploration coupled with the
geologic requirements of uranium, we
foresee minimal potential impacts from
uranium mining to the species as a
whole in the foreseeable future.
Gypsum—Although not specifically
mentioned in any previous Service
threats assessment, gypsum mining also
occurs in the vicinity of Erigeron
maguirei. While E. maguirei does not
occur in the geologic formation that
contains commercial quality gypsum,
suitable habitat may be crossed while
accessing the more desirable geologic
formations (Clark et al. 2006, p. 20).
According to the Utah Mineral
Occurrence System database, one
gypsum occurrence that never produced
lies within the mapped Deep Creek
population within Capitol Reef (UGS
2007). This occurrence is located on the
periphery of the mapped population
and within the Primitive Management
Zone (Capitol Reef 1998, p. 27; UGS
2007). NPS regulations protect this
population by limiting access (Capitol
Reef 1998, p. 27). Travel through this
Management Zone is limited to crosscountry hiking or horseback riding on
unimproved trails and routes (Capitol
Reef 1998, pp. 28–29). Within the
Primitive Management Zone,
developments are not permitted and
physical modifications are not allowed
except for natural or cultural resource
protection (Capitol Reef 1998, p. 29).
More importantly, lands are withdrawn
from mining and mineral exploration in
Capitol Reef (Clark et al. 2006, p. 21).
Therefore, gypsum mining impacts to
the E. maguirei are not likely in the
foreseeable future.
Oil Shale and Tar Sands—The
Conservation Strategy does not
recognize oil shale and tar sands as a
threat (Forest Service et al. 2006, p. 37).
However, the mapped populations of
Calf Canyon, Secret Mesa, and Link
Flats overlap the mapped tar sand areas
as depicted on the Energy Resources
Map of Utah (Automated Geographic
Reference Center (AGRC) 2001a, 2001b;
Clark et al. 2006, p. 9). Tar sands are a
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
mixture of sand or clay, water, and
extremely heavy crude oil. Typically,
strip mining is the most efficient
method of extraction, but other
approaches include the injection of
steam and/or solvents to reduce the oils
viscosity allowing the oil to be pumped
out of the well.
Ten percent of the mapped Calf
Canyon population overlaps that of the
mapped high probability tar sand areas
and probable tar sand areas (AGRC
2001b; Clark et al. 2006, p. 9). The
Secret Mesa population contains a small
area of tar sands (AGRC 2001a; Clark et
al. 2006, p. 9). The Link Flats
population contains a small area of tar
sands, and approximately 2 percent of
the mapped area overlaps that of the
mapped probable and highly probable
tar sand areas (AGRC 2001a, 2001b;
Clark et al. 2006, p. 9). Portions of the
mapped Calf Canyon, Secret Mesa, and
Link Flats populations have been
identified in the Draft Oil Shale and Tar
Sands Resource Management Plan
Amendments to Address Land Use
Allocations in Colorado, Utah, and
Wyoming and Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement (BLM
2007, pp. 3–127 and 3–163; Clark et al.
2006, p. 9). The purpose of the draft
programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement is to describe where oil shale
and tar sands resources are present, and
to decide which areas will be open to
application for commercial leasing,
exploration, and development (BLM
2007, pp. 1–2). The final Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement is
expected to be published in 2008 (BLM
2008b). A final determination on this
proposed delisting rule will not be
completed until the programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement is
finalized; and the Record of Decision
will be analyzed as part of our final
determination. If tar sands development
does occur in the San Rafael Swell area,
the loss of significant portions of these
populations from this activity is not
anticipated because the mineral
resources occur along the periphery of
the mapped populations and only
contain a small percentage of the
mapped area.
Impacts to individual plants from tar
sands development may still occur.
These impacts can be a result of
vegetation clearing, habitat
fragmentation, alteration of topography,
changes in drainage patters, erosion,
sedimentation from runoff, oil and
contaminant spills, fugitive dust, injury
or mortality of individual plants, human
collection, increased human access,
spread of invasive plant species, and air
pollution (BLM 2007, pp. 5–77). In
addition, we believe the development of
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
tar sands may also impact pollinator
species. Given where development is
likely to occur and the locations of
where plants occur, we expect impacts
to the species to be minor.
Additionally, protective land
management designations apply to the
Secret Mesa population. Ninety percent
of the BLM portion of the mapped
Secret Mesa population occurs within
Sid’s Mountain and Devils Canyon
WSAs (Clark et al. 2005, pp. 16–17;
Ivory 2006). As stated previously, WSAs
are designated as primitive-class areas
and are to be managed free of evidence
of human use and to maintain an
environment of isolation (BLM 1991a, p.
89). Only temporary uses, and those that
create no new surface disturbance nor
involve permanent placement of
structures, are permitted within WSAs
(BLM 1976, p. 2). All WSAs are closed
to use and development of minerals
(BLM 1991a, pp. 19, 64).
Oil and Gas Exploration and
Development—Oil and gas exploration
and development were listed as threats
in the listing rule, Recovery Plan, and
downlisting rule (50 FR 36089,
September 5, 1985; Service 1995, p. 5;
61 FR 31054, 31056, June 19, 1996). Oil
and gas leases were located in the area
of the last known Erigeron maguirei site
at the time of the 1985 listing (50 FR
36090, September 5, 1985).
Lands within Capitol Reef have been
withdrawn from oil and gas exploration
and development (Forest Service et al.
2006, p. 56). The BLM and Forest
Service lands are open to oil and gas
leasing, but the potential for oil and gas
is low in the Navajo Sandstone
formation where Erigeron maguirei
occurs (Forest Service et al. 2006, p. 34).
Within BLM-administered mineral
resources, oil and gas leases that were
issued prior to the BLM Resource
Management Plan are managed under
the stipulations that were in effect when
the lease was issued (BLM 1991a, p. 11).
Any leases issued after the Plan was
signed must comply with the Resource
Management Plan (BLM 1991a, p. 11,
map 5). The Plan identifies specific
management prescriptions by ACEC
(BLM 1991a, pp. 14–15). The known
Erigeron maguirei populations on BLM
administered lands occur within the
San Rafael Canyon (middle portion),
Sid’s Mountain, Highway I–70 Scenic
Corridor, Muddy Creek, and Seger’s
Hole ACECs (Clark et al. 2005, pp. 16–
17; Ivory 2006). The San Rafael Canyon
ACEC (middle portion) is open to
leasing, but surface restrictions apply
(BLM 1991a, p. 14). According to the
Conservation Strategy, BLM will adjust
surface disturbance locations to avoid E.
maguirei for discretionary and leasable
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
minerals including the San Rafael
Canyon ACEC (middle portion) (Forest
Service et al. 2006, pp. 34, 36–38, 42–
44). The remaining ACECs that contain
E. maguirei populations have nosurface-occupancy stipulations for oil
and gas development attached to the
lease (BLM 1991a, p. 14). Leasing with
‘‘no surface occupancy’’ means that
there will be no development or
disturbance whatsoever of the land
surface, including establishment of
wells or well pads, and construction of
roads, pipelines, or powerlines. WSAs
with E. maguirei populations, including
the Sid’s Mountain, Devils Canyon, and
Muddy Creek WSAs, are open for
leasing, but also have no-surfaceoccupancy stipulations (BLM 1991a, pp.
14, 64).
Seven wells have been sited within
the mapped Secret Mesa and Coal Wash
populations, but all of them have been
plugged and abandoned (Clark et al.
2006, p. 9; Utah Division of Oil, Gas,
and Mining (UDOGM) 2006a). While
limited exploration has occurred, no
known oil or gas fields exist within the
known Erigeron maguirei populations
and the potential for development is
low (AGRC 2001c; Clark et al. 2006, p.
21; UDOGM 2006b, Forest Service et al.
2006, p. 34). The only gas field in the
vicinity of the E. maguirei is the Last
Chance Gas Field located approximately
11 km (7 mi) west of the Seger’s Hole
population and 10 km (6 mi) north of
the Deep Creek population (AGRC
2001c; Chidsey et al. 2005; Clark et al.
2006, p. 16; UDOGM 2006b). Based on
the lack of supporting evidence of viable
oil and gas fields within the vicinity of
the E. maguirei and the land
management designations affording
protections to the species, oil and gas
exploration and development is no
longer considered a threat, nor is it
likely to become one within the
foreseeable future.
Recreational Use—Recreational use,
including off-road vehicles and human
foot traffic, have previously been cited
as threats to the species (50 FR 36090,
September 5, 1985; Service 1995, p. 5;
61 FR 31056, June 19, 1996). Erigeron
maguirei habitat does not occur within
0.8 km (0.5 mi) of classified or
potentially designated motorized routes
on Fishlake National Forest lands
(Forest Service 2006c, pp. 123, 260–
263). According to the Fishlake National
Forest Off-Highway Vehicle Route
Designation Project, it is unlikely that
motorized traffic would infringe upon
the E. maguirei population on Forest
Service land, thereby, providing
protections from this threat to this
portion of the species’ range (Forest
Service 2006c, p. 263). Capitol Reef,
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28417
which comprises 91 percent of the
species’ total population, is closed to
off-road vehicle use (Clark et al. 2006,
p. 20).
Almost 6 percent of individual plants
occur on lands administered by the
BLM, of which approximately 80
percent occur within an ACEC and/or
WSA (Kass 1990, p. 23; BLM 1991a, pp.
63–64; Clark et al. 2006, p. 18; Ivory
2006). Four of the six Erigeron maguirei
populations that occur on BLM lands
are within the Sid’s Mountain, Muddy
Creek, and Devils Canyon WSA (Kass
1990, p. 23; Clark et al. 2005, p. 19;
Ivory 2006). These WSAs are either
closed to motorized vehicles or use is
limited to designated roads and trails
(BLM 1991a, pp. 63–64, 68, 89; Clark et
al. 2006, p. 20). San Rafael Canyon
(middle portion), Sid’s Mountain,
Highway I–70 Scenic Corridor, Muddy
Creek, and Seger’s Hole ACECs contain
five of the six known populations on
BLM lands (Clark et al. 2005, pp. 16–17;
Ivory 2006). These areas have either
been closed to off-road vehicle use or
use has been limited to designated roads
and trails (BLM 1991a, p. 68).
Erigeron maguirei is not prone to
human disturbance because it grows
primarily in cliff crevices and on
sandstone domes (Clark 2002, p. 16).
From 2000 to 2002, 60 sites were
included within a Capitol Reef study on
signs of human impacts (Clark 2002, pp.
12–16). Only 2 of these sites showed
any signs of human impacts (in both
cases foot traffic through the site) (Clark
2002, pp. 15–16). At one site monitored
with an electronic counter, visitor use
remained fairly stable at 10 visitors per
week (Clark et al. 2006, p. 21). After
over a decade of monitoring, human
trampling may have impacted some
individuals, but has not led to a
reduction in population survivability
(Clark et al. 2006, p. 21). Therefore,
impacts from recreation are not a threat
to E. maguirei populations in the
foreseeable future.
Floods—Two of four Capitol Reef sites
monitored between 1992 and 2001 have
experienced flash flood events (Van
Buren and Harper 2002, p. 1). At one
site, a flash flood event likely resulted
in 48 plants being lost (Van Buren and
Harper 2002, p. 2). However, the species
is long lived and shows an ability to
replace individuals lost to periodic
flooding (Van Buren and Harper 2002,
pp. 4–5). Therefore, flood events
possessing the potential to meaningfully
impact Erigeron maguirei populations
are unlikely in the foreseeable future.
Summary of Factor A—Mineral
exploration and development, and
recreational use were listed as threats to
Erigeron maguirei in the 1985 listing
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
28418
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
rule, 1995 Recovery Plan, and 1996
downlisting rule (50 FR 36089,
September 5, 1985; Service 1995, p. 5;
61 FR 31054, June 19, 1996). Since the
last Federal action, recovery efforts have
increased our understanding of the
species, its habitat, and its distribution
and abundance (61 FR 31054–31058,
June 19, 1996; Harper and Van Buren
1998, p. 2; Clark and Clark 1999, p. 47;
Clark 2001, p. 3; Clark 2002, pp. 13–14;
Clark et al. 2005, p. 17; Clark et al. 2006,
p. 17). The species occurs
predominantly within the Navajo
Sandstone formation, which has low
potential for oil and gas development
and uranium mining (Forest Service et
al. 2006, p. 37). Most mineral resources
(like gypsum, tar sands, and oil shale)
occur on the periphery of mapped
populations and, therefore, are not
likely to meaningfully impact any of the
populations. Impacts from
fragmentation are also expected to be
minor. Land management protections
throughout most of the species’ range
and an increased understanding of the
species’ habitat have reduced the threat
of recreational use. While potential
impacts to individuals could occur
when either accessing the mineral
resources or during recreational use,
these activities are considered unlikely
to materialize in a meaningful way in
the foreseeable future, would be limited
to small periphery portions of
populations, and would not reduce the
long-term viability of any of the
populations. In addition, land
management designations, which have
been discussed briefly in this section
and will be discussed in more detail
under Factor D, will continue to provide
protections for E. maguirei and its
habitat in the foreseeable future.
B. Overutilization for Commercial,
Recreational, Scientific, or Educational
Purposes
Erigeron maguirei is not a highly
collected or sought-after species. One
group was known to be propagating E.
maguirei for private use (a European
group was propagating E. maguirei for
rock garden enthusiasts) (Forest Service
et al. 2006, p. 35; Clark 2007b), but no
longer appears to be offering plants for
sale (Megown 2007). To date,
unauthorized plant and seed collection
has not been documented for this
species (Forest Service et al. 2006, p.
35). Although the Interagency Rare Plant
Team working under the Conservation
Strategy will continue to monitor for
illegal collection activity (Forest Service
et al. 2006, p. 35), we do not believe
overutilization to be a current threat to
the species, nor likely to be in the
foreseeable future.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
C. Disease or Predation
At the time of listing, plants were
observed only in rocky areas
inaccessible to cattle grazing (50 FR
36090, September 5, 1985), and not in
canyon bottoms where plants were
originally located in 1940 and 1980.
Because the plants could not be
relocated in the canyon bottoms,
scientists believed that predation due to
cattle grazing had reduced the species’
distribution (50 FR 36090, September 5,
1985; 61 FR 31056, June 19, 1996;
Harper and Van Buren 1998, p. 2). By
the time the Recovery Plan was drafted,
it concluded that the majority of the
Erigeron maguirei populations were
relatively secure from direct impacts of
livestock trampling, but it could be a
localized threat in some areas (Service
1995, p. 5). We concluded in the final
downlisting rule that concentrations of
livestock in localized areas, specifically
wash bottoms that have limited
vegetation, may result in E. maguirei
being grazed by livestock (61 FR 31056,
June 19, 1996; Kass 1990, p. 28). The
species is now known to prefer cliffs or
rock crevices that are inaccessible to
livestock (Kass 1990, p. 27; Service
1995, p. 2; Clark 2001, p. 15; Clark et
al. 2005, pp. 12, 22, 24; Clark et al. 2006,
pp. 21–22; Forest Service et al. 2006, p.
56). Erigeron maguirei plants within
canyon bottoms are small, incidental
occurrences, apparently established
from seeds dispersed by wind or
overland flow from source populations
on the mesa tops (Heil 1989, p. 25; Kass
1990, p. 27; Service 1995, p. 2).
Although seven of the nine Erigeron
maguirei populations occur within
cattle allotments, all seven of these
populations are inaccessible to cattle
grazing due to terrain conditions (Forest
Service et al. 2006, p. 56). Of the two
remaining populations, the Waterpocket
Fold population in Capitol Reef,
estimated at approximately 20,000
individuals on 42 sites, has a history of
cattle trailing (Forest Service et al. 2006,
p. 56). Cattle trailing, or moving cattle
through the area, has occurred at this
site about once every 5 years for the past
100 years (Clark et al. 2006, pp. 21, 25).
Cattle trailing has impacted, and is
expected to continue to impact, only a
few individual plants (Clark et al. 2006,
pp. 21, 25). The Conservation Strategy
states that Capitol Reef will monitor for
potential impacts as well as identify and
implement management actions and
guidelines that will help maintain longterm sustainability and conservation of
the population (Forest Service et al.
2006, pp. 35–37). Additionally, grazing
range improvements outside of the
range of E. maguirei serve to draw cattle
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
further away from E. maguirei
populations (Clark et al. 2006, pp. 21,
25). Because we now know that E.
maguirei primarily occurs in areas
inaccessible to livestock, in combination
with the increased population and
distribution, grazing is no longer
considered a threat, nor is it likely to
become one within the foreseeable
future.
D. The Inadequacy of Existing
Regulatory Mechanisms
Prior to the species’ 1985 listing, no
Federal or State laws protected Erigeron
maguirei (50 FR 36090, September 5,
1985). Since then, substantial
protections have been secured. The
BLM Management Plan has provided
protection to E. maguirei and its habitat
in the San Rafael Swell areas (BLM
1991a; 61 FR 31056, June 19, 1996). The
completion and implementation of the
National Park Service Capitol Reef
Management Plan has provided
protection to the largest populations of
E. maguirei and its habitat (61 FR 31056,
June 19, 1996). Habitat for E. maguirei
does not occur within 0.8 km (0.5 mi)
of classified or potentially designated
motorized routes on Fishlake National
Forest lands (Forest Service 2006c, pp.
123, 260–263). In addition, the proposed
Fishlake National Forest Management
Plan would afford protections to the
remaining portions of the Capitol Reef
Meta-Population through the
designation of the Billings Pass
Botanical Area (Forest Service 2006a,
pp. 2c–17, 2c–18, 2c–43; Tait 2006).
Over 98 percent of known Erigeron
maguirei plants occur on lands managed
by Capitol Reef (91 percent), BLM Price
Field Office (6 percent), and Fishlake
National Forest (1 percent) (Clark et al.
2006, p. 16) (Table 1). Less than 2
percent of the known population occurs
on lands administered by SITLA where
no protections for E. maguirei exist
(Clark et al. 2006, p. 16) (Table 1).
On BLM lands, WSAs are managed
according to the Interim Management
Policy for Lands under Wilderness
Review, BLM Handbook 8550–1, until
Congress either designates them into the
National Wilderness Preservation
System or releases them from
wilderness study for other purposes
(BLM 1976, p. 1). In 1991, BLM
recommended to Congress that: 100
percent of the Muddy Creek WSA be
made permanent wilderness; 99 percent
of the Sid’s Mountain WSA be made
permanent wilderness; and none of the
Devils Canyon WSA be made permanent
wilderness (BLM 1991b, pp. 795, 807,
817). The Devils Canyon WSA includes
approximately 10 percent of the BLM
portion of the Secret Mesa population
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
(Ivory 2007). Given BLM’s support for
the permanent protection of the majority
of the WSAs where Erigeron maguirei
occurs, we believe Congressional release
from the National Wilderness
Preservation System is unlikely.
Four of the six known populations of
Erigeron maguirei that occur on lands
administered by the BLM are within the
Muddy Creek, Sid’s Mountain, and
Devils Canyon WSA (Kass 1990, p. 23;
BLM 1991a, pp. 63–64; Clark et al. 2005,
p. 19; Ivory 2006). One-hundred percent
of the John’s Hole and 50 percent of the
Seger’s Hole populations occur within
the Muddy Creek WSA (Clark et al.
2006, p. 16; Ivory 2006). Ninety percent
of the Coal Wash population occurs
within the Sid’s Mountain WSA (Clark
et al. 2006, p. 16; Ivory 2006). Ninety
percent of the portion of the Secret Mesa
population on BLM lands occurs within
the Sid’s Mountain and Devils Canyon
WSAs (Clark et al. 2006, p. 16; Ivory
2006). The Links Flats population is the
only occurrence on BLM lands without
any portion of the population protected
as a WSA. Table 1 further illustrates the
various protections in place on each of
these populations.
Except for grandfathered uses, the
lands under wilderness review must be
managed so as not to impair their
suitability for preservation as
wilderness (BLM 1976, p. 2). Grazing, a
non-threat as discussed above, is the
only grandfathered use exempt from no
surface occupancy stipulations. No
surface disturbance stipulations apply
to grandfathered mining and mineral
extraction. While lands under
wilderness review may not be closed to
future appropriation under the mining
laws, no surface occupancy stipulations
apply in order to preserve their
wilderness character (BLM 1976, p. 2).
Temporary uses are permitted within
WSAs as long as they create no new
surface disturbance and do not involve
permanent placement of structures
(BLM 1976, p. 2).
The BLM San Rafael Resource
Management Plan was approved on May
24, 1991 (BLM 1991a). Erigeron
maguirei is provided protection through
land use planning decisions, including
the designation of ACECs (BLM 1991a).
Five of the six known populations of E.
maguirei that occur on lands
administered by the BLM are within the
San Rafael Canyon (middle portion),
Sid’s Mountain, Highway I–70 Scenic
Corridor, Muddy Creek, and Seger’s
Hole ACECs (Clark et al. 2005, p. 16;
Ivory 2006). Twenty-five percent of Calf
Canyon population’s range occurs on
BLM land, of which 95 percent occurs
within the San Rafael Canyon ACEC
(middle portion) (Clark et al. 2006, p.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
16; Ivory 2006). One-hundred percent of
the Coal Wash population occurs within
the Sid’s Mountain ACEC (Clark et al.
2006, p. 16; Ivory 2006). One-hundred
percent of the portion of the Secret Mesa
population on BLM land occurs within
the Sid’s Mountain ACEC or Highway I–
70 Scenic Corridor ACEC (Clark et al.
2006, p. 16; Ivory 2006). Ten percent of
the John’s Hole population’s range
occurs within the Muddy Creek ACEC
(Clark et al. 2006, p. 16; Ivory 2006).
Twenty percent of the Seger’s Hole
population’s range occurs within the
Seger’s Hole ACEC (Clark et al. 2006, p.
16; Ivory 2006). The Links Flats
population is the only occurrence on
BLM lands without any portion of the
population protected as an ACEC. Table
1 further illustrates the various
protections in place for each population
and highlights where ACECs and WSAs
overlap.
Special management conditions that
apply to all WSAs and ACECs include:
Open to mineral entry with plans of
operations; avoided for right-of-way
grants; excluded from private and
commercial use of woodland products,
except for limited onsite collection of
downed dead wood for campfires;
designated as closed to off-road vehicle
use when ACEC is within a WSA or
WSA has been designated as primitive,
otherwise use is limited to designated
roads and trails; and they are subject to
fire suppression with special conditions
(BLM 1991a, pp. 14, 64–69, 81–89).
The Highway I–70 Scenic Corridor,
Muddy Creek, Seger’s Hole, and Sid’s
Mountain ACECs are open to mineral
leasing, but no-surface-occupancy
stipulations must be attached to the
lease. These areas are also closed for
disposal of mineral materials; open to
range improvements with special
conditions; excluded from land
treatments; and are designated as Visual
Resource Management Class I (described
above) (BLM 1991a, pp. 14, 64, 81–82).
An exception to the no-surfaceoccupancy stipulation may be granted
in the Highway I–70 Scenic Corridor
ACEC if an environmental assessment
concludes that the proposed action
would not adversely affect scenic values
(BLM 1991a, pp. 14, 81–82).
The San Rafael Canyon ACEC (middle
portion) is open to mineral leasing with
surface restrictions; open for disposal of
mineral materials with special
conditions; excluded from range
improvements and land treatments
unless used to protect or improve
riparian values; and is designated as
Visual Resource Management Class II
(BLM 1991a, pp. 14, 64, 81–82). The
objective of this class is to retain the
existing character of the landscape. The
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28419
level of change to the characteristic
landscape should be low. Management
activities may be seen, but should not
attract the attention of the casual
observer. Any changes must repeat the
basic elements of form, line, color, and
texture found in the predominant
natural features of the characteristic
landscape.
The Highway I–70 Scenic Corridor,
Muddy Creek, San Rafael Canyon
(Middle Portion), Seger’s Hole, and
Sid’s Mountain ACECs are managed to
protect scenic values (BLM 1991a, pp.
82–85). The Muddy Creek ACEC also
contains the Tomsich Butte special
emphasis area, which is managed to
protect historic values (BLM 1991a, p.
82).
The BLM Price Field Office is
proceeding with a revision of the 1991
Resource Management Plan (BLM 2004).
Final decisions on special designations
will be made in the Final Resource
Management Plan by the summer of
2008 (BLM 2008a, p. 1). The WSA
designations will remain until Congress
acts to remove them from this status, or
they are determined to be Wilderness
Areas. The protective management
resulting from ACEC designations could
be revised by this process. Not all of the
Draft Resource Management Plan
alternatives contain ACEC designations.
Our final determination on this
proposed delisting rule will not be
completed before the conclusion of this
process and will consider the final
decisions regarding these ACECs.
National Parks are administered
under the provisions of ‘‘An Act to
establish a National Park Service and for
other purposes approved August 25,
1916’’ (39 Stat. 535), as amended and
supplemented (commonly referred to as
the ‘‘Organic Act’’ because it created the
National Park System) (16 U.S.C. 1, 2–
4). The Organic Act specifies that the
NPS is to ‘‘promote and regulate the use
of the Federal areas known as national
parks, monuments, and reservations
* * * which purpose is to conserve the
scenery and the natural and historic
objects and the wild life therein and to
provide for the enjoyment of the same
in such manner and by such means as
will leave them unimpaired for the
enjoyment of future generations.’’
Capitol Reef National Park, which
contains approximately 91 percent of
the Erigeron maguirei individuals, has
land management policies in place that
afford protection to the species. Capitol
Reef’s 1998 Final General Management
Plan/Development Concept Plan defines
Primitive and Threshold Management
Zones within the Park (Capitol Reef
1998, pp. 27–31). All Capitol Reef E.
maguirei sites are located within these
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
28420
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Management Zones (Clark 2006a).
Travel through the Primitive
Management Zones is limited to crosscountry hiking or horseback riding on
unimproved trails and routes and travel
within the Threshold Management Zone
is on paved or two-wheel drive, low
clearance, all-weather roads (Capitol
Reef 1998, pp. 28–31). Grazing is not
allowed within either of these zones
(Capitol Reef 1998, pp. 28–31). Within
the Primitive Management Zone,
developments are not permitted and
physical modifications are not allowed
except for natural or cultural resource
protection (Capitol Reef 1998, p. 29).
Limited development is provided in the
Threshold Management Zone, but no
new major structures or facilities are
allowed (Capitol Reef 1998, p. 31). The
remoteness of the species and its
preference of the Navajo Sandstone
formation, which is predominantly on
top of mesas and other inaccessible
areas, render the habitat for E. maguirei
safe from development.
The 2006 NPS Management Policies
Section 4.4.1.1, Plant and Animal
Population Management Principles,
states that the NPS will maintain all
native plant and animal species and
their habitats inside parks. In addition,
these policies state that ‘‘the (National
Park) Service will work with other land
managers to encourage the conservation
of the populations and habitats of these
species outside parks whenever
possible’’ (NPS 2006, p. 62).
The National Forest Management Act
(1976) directs National Forests to
manage habitat to maintain viable
populations of existing native and
desired nonnative vertebrate species in
habitat distributed throughout their
geographic range on National Forest
System lands (Forest Service 1976). In
1983, U.S. Department of Agriculture
Departmental Regulation 9500–4
provided further direction to the Forest
Service, expanding the viability
requirements to include plant species
(U.S. Department of Agriculture 1983, p.
2). While the 2005 Forest Service
planning regulations (70 FR 1023,
January 5, 2005) would have eliminated
species’ viability requirements, these
regulations were remanded by the court
on March 30, 2007 (Citizens for Better
Forestry v. U.S. Department of
Agriculture (Northern District of
California 2007)).
Because Erigeron maguirei was not
known to occur on Forest Service lands
in 1986, the current Forest Service land
management plan does not identify E.
maguirei as occurring within the
National Forest (Forest Service 1986).
Less than 1 percent of all known plants
occur on National Forest Service lands.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
Of these, the current mapped range of E.
maguirei on Forest Service lands is as
follows: Approximately 33 percent is
designated as a Semi-Primitive NonMotorized area; approximately 65
percent is designation as an Intensive
Livestock Management area; and the
remaining 2 percent is designated a
Wood Fiber Non-Sawtimber area.
In December 2006, the Fishlake
National Forest finalized their OffHighway Vehicle Route Designation
Project providing further protections for
this area (Forest Service 2006b). Under
this plan, motorized routes on Fishlake
National Forest lands can not occur
within 0.8 km (0.5 mi) of the Deep Creek
population (Forest Service 2006c, pp.
123, 260–263).
In June 2006, the Dixie and Fishlake
National Forests released a draft
revision to their land management plan
(Forest Service 2006a). The proposed
Billings Pass Botanical Area
encompasses all the habitat
administered by the Forest Service
within the Capitol Reef Meta-Population
(Forest Service 2006a, pp. 2c–17, 2c–18,
2c–43; Tait 2006). Additional suitable
habitat exists outside of this Botanical
Area, but it has not yet been surveyed
(Tait 2006). The emphasis for this area
is on maintaining the endemic plants
that live in the area (Forest Service
2006a, pp. 2c–18). The Billings Pass
Botanical Area is within the semiprimitive non-motorized use area where
travel is restricted to hiking and
horseback riding (Forest Service 2006a,
pp. 1b–34, 1b–37). At the time of this
proposed delisting rule, a schedule was
not available for the completion of the
final Dixie National Forest and Fishlake
National Forest Land Management Plan.
The portion of the range owned by
SITLA, which contains less than 2
percent of all known or estimated
Maguire daisy plants, does not have any
special management to benefit Erigeron
maguirei. SITLA’s mission mandates
that revenue is the only factor
considered in management and sale
decisions. About 75 percent of the range
of the Calf Canyon population (last
surveyed in 1980) is on land owned by
SITLA. About 10 percent of the Secret
Mesa population occurs on SITLA
lands. And about 20 percent of the Link
Flats population occurs on SITLA lands.
In total, SITLA manages about 2 percent
of all known or estimated Maguire daisy
plants (see Table 1).
Summary of Factor D: In conclusion,
Federal land management agencies have
worked collaboratively since listing to
ensure long-term protection of Erigeron
maguirei and its habitat. Land
management plans, policies, and
regulations that provide protection to E.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
maguirei are now in place and include:
(1) Capitol Reef Primitive and SemiPrimitive Management Zones; (2) BLM
WSAs and ACECs; and (3) Forest
Service semi-primitive non-motorized
designations. If the proposed Fishlake
National Forest Botanical Area is
finalized, this will provide additional
protections for Forest Service’s portion
of the Capitol Reef Meta-Population.
The threat due to inadequacy of existing
regulatory mechanisms is no longer
applicable.
Furthermore, the Interagency Rare
Plant Team’s collaborative efforts will
continue to benefit Erigeron maguirei.
Most recently, this team developed the
Conservation Strategy (Forest Service et
al. 2006, pp. 5–6). Through the
Conservation Strategy the agencies have
committed to survey and monitor E.
maguirei (and other species) and
implement management to ensure the
population remains stable after delisting
(Forest Service et al. 2006, p. 5). The
Conservation Strategy outlines the
procedural provisions that will guide
Federal agencies’ future management of
the E. maguirei and other species (Forest
Service et al. 2006, pp. 24–25). In
addition, this Conservation Strategy
commits the Federal agencies, to the
extent practicable, to implement the
conservation actions needed to reduce
or eliminate potential threats and to
promote the conservation and
perpetuation of E. maguirei and other
species (Forest Service et al. 2006, pp.
38–47). The Conservation Strategy can
be viewed in its entirety at: https://
mountain-prairie.fws.gov/species/
plants/maguiredaisy/. Copies can also
be obtained from the Utah field office
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section).
E. Other Natural or Manmade Factors
Affecting its Continued Existence
The 1985 final listing rule mentioned
that the genetic viability of Erigeron
maguirei was thought to be greatly
reduced due to the small known
population size, geographic separation,
and reproductive isolation (50 FR
36090, September 5, 1985). The June 19,
1996, final rule reclassifying E. maguirei
to threatened also listed inbreeding and
loss of genetic variability as potential
threats since the species continued to be
known only from small, reproductively
isolated populations (61 FR 31056, June
19, 1996).
As discussed previously, recovery
efforts have substantially increased the
known number and distribution of
Erigeron maguirei individuals
rangewide. These newly discovered
sites provide connectivity between the
known sites identified since we
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
published the final listing and
downlisting rules and Recovery Plan,
thus reducing inbreeding threats posed
by geographic separation and
reproductive isolation (50 FR 36089–
36092, September 5, 1985; Service 1995,
p. 5; 61 FR 31054–31058, June 19, 1996;
Clark et al. 2006, p. 24). In addition,
populations in the Capitol Reef area are
separated by short distances and are
connected to contiguous habitat (Clark
et al. 2006, p. 24). A similar situation
exists within the San Rafael Swell area
where most suitable habitat occurrences
are separated by short distances (Clark
et al. 2006, p. 24). Additional survey
work here would also likely find
additional sites connecting populations
and Meta-Populations. Due to the
number of populations and individuals
of E. maguirei found and the interconnectivity of the habitat, the species
is no longer considered to be threatened
by a loss of genetic variability.
Pesticide use is known to occur
within Capitol Reef’s Fruita Rural
Historic District; a cultural area on the
National Register of Historic Places
(Alston and Tepedino 2005, p. 10). This
area must be managed effectively for
fruit production (Alston and Tepedino
2005, p. 10). Management includes
spraying apple and pear trees with the
pesticide Phosmet in order to control
the codling moth (Cydia pomonella)
(Alston and Tepedino 2005, p. 10).
Capitol Reef’s Integrated Pest
Management program states that the use
of Phosmet may affect nearby
populations of threatened and
endangered species, including Erigeron
maguirei (Alston and Tepedino 2005,
pp. 10–11). Alston and Tepedino (2005,
p. 11) studied an E. maguirei site near
the orchard (1.8 km/1.1 mi) and one
further away (5.7 km/3.5 mi), finding no
significant difference in productivity.
No other routine pesticide use is known
to occur within the range of E. maguirei.
Thus, the best scientific data available
does not suggest the current use of the
Phosmet insecticide is a threat to E.
maguirei (Alston and Tepedino 2005, p.
61).
When the Recovery Plan was written,
the demographic stability of the various
populations was not known (Service
1995, p. 5). Van Buren and Harper
(2002, p. 2) conducted demographic
monitoring studies for three Erigeron
maguirei populations from 1992 to
2001. Their studies have found E.
maguirei to be relatively long lived with
low mortality. The species has the
ability to replace individuals at a rate
that compensates for mortality (Van
Buren and Harper 2002, p. 5).
Summary of Factor E: In conclusion,
reduced genetic variability, inbreeding
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
posed by geographic separation and
reproductive isolation, and the use of
Phosmet as an insecticide in the Capitol
Reef’s Fruita Rural Historic District do
not threaten with extinction Erigeron
maguirei in all or a significant portion
of the range currently or within the
foreseeable future.
Conclusion of 5-Factor Analysis
As required by the Act, we considered
the five potential threat factors to assess
whether Erigeron maguirei is threatened
or endangered throughout all or a
significant portion of its range. When
considering the listing status of the
species, the first step in the analysis is
to determine whether the species is in
danger of extinction throughout all of its
range. If this is the case, then the species
is listed or remains listed in its entirety.
For instance, if the threats on a species
are acting only on a portion of its range,
but they are at such a large scale that
they place the entire species in danger
of extinction, we would list or continue
to list the entire species.
We have carefully assessed the best
scientific and commercial data available
and determined there is no information
to suggest the species is either in danger
of extinction throughout all of its range
or likely to become endangered in the
foreseeable future throughout all its
range. Recovery efforts have identified
approximately 164,250 Erigeron
maguirei individuals over an estimated
range of 1,010 square km (390 square
mi) (Clark et al. 2006, p. 17). This
represents a substantial increase from
the time of listing in 1985, when the
species was known from 7 individuals
on BLM land limited to the upper ends
of branches of Pine Canyon (49 FR
30211, July 27, 1984); and from 1996
when the species was downlisted to
threatened, when taxonomic revision
had increased the total population of E.
maguirei to approximately 3,000 plants
within 5 populations from the San
Rafael Swell in Emery County to Capitol
Reef in Wayne County (59 FR 46220,
September 7, 1994). Current populations
appear stable, threats to the species have
been addressed, and adequate regulatory
mechanisms ensure the species is not
currently and is not likely to again
become threatened or endangered in all
of its range.
Having determined that Erigeron
maguirei does not meet the definition of
threatened or endangered throughout all
of its range, we must next consider
whether there are any significant
portions of its range that are in danger
of extinction or are likely to become
endangered in the foreseeable future. On
March 16, 2007, a formal opinion was
issued by the Solicitor of the
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28421
Department of the Interior, ‘‘The
Meaning of ‘In Danger of Extinction
Throughout All or a Significant Portion
of Its Range’ ’’ (U.S. DOI 2007). We have
summarized our interpretation of that
opinion and the underlying statutory
language below. A portion of a species’
range is significant if it is part of the
current range of the species and is
important to the conservation of the
species because it contributes
meaningfully to the representation,
resiliency, or redundancy of the species.
The contribution must be at a level such
that its loss would result in a decrease
in the ability to conserve the species.
The first step in determining whether
a species is threatened or endangered in
a significant portion of its range is to
identify any portions of the range of the
species that warrant further
consideration. The range of a species
can theoretically be divided into
portions in an infinite number of ways.
However, there is no purpose to
analyzing portions of the range that are
not reasonably likely to be significant
and threatened or endangered. To
identify only those portions that warrant
further consideration, we determine
whether there is substantial information
indicating that (i) the portions may be
significant and (ii) the species may be in
danger of extinction there or likely to
become so within the foreseeable future.
In practice, a key part of this analysis is
whether the threats are geographically
concentrated in some way. If the threats
to the species are essentially uniform
throughout its range, no portion is likely
to warrant further consideration.
Moreover, if any concentration of
threats applies only to portions of the
range that are unimportant to the
conservation of the species, such
portions will not warrant further
consideration.
If we identify any portions that
warrant further consideration, we then
determine whether in fact the species is
threatened or endangered in any
significant portion of its range.
Depending on the biology of the species,
its range, and the threats it faces, it may
be more efficient in some cases for the
Service to address the significance
question first, and in others the status
question first. Thus, if the Service
determines that a portion of the range is
not significant, the Service need not
determine whether the species is
threatened or endangered there;
conversely, if the Service determines
that the species is not threatened or
endangered in a portion of its range, the
Service need not determine if that
portion is significant.
The terms ‘‘resiliency,’’
‘‘redundancy,’’ and ‘‘representation’’ are
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
28422
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
intended to be indicators of the
conservation value of portions of the
range. Resiliency of a species allows the
species to recover from periodic
disturbance. A species will likely be
more resilient if large populations exist
in high-quality habitat that is
distributed throughout the range of the
species in such a way as to capture the
environmental variability within the
range of the species. It is likely that the
larger size of a population will help
contribute to the viability of the species.
Thus, a portion of the range of a species
may make a meaningful contribution to
the resiliency of the species if the area
is relatively large and contains
particularly high-quality habitat or if its
location or characteristics make it less
susceptible to certain threats than other
portions of the range. When evaluating
whether or how a portion of the range
contributes to resiliency of the species,
it may help to evaluate the historical
value of the portion and how frequently
the portion is used by the species. In
addition, the portion may contribute to
resiliency for other reasons—for
instance, it may contain an important
concentration of certain types of habitat
that are necessary for the species to
carry out its life-history functions, such
as breeding, feeding, migration,
dispersal, or wintering.
Redundancy of populations may be
needed to provide a margin of safety for
the species to withstand catastrophic
events. This does not mean that any
portion that provides redundancy is a
significant portion of the range of a
species. The idea is to conserve enough
areas of the range such that random
perturbations in the system act on only
a few populations. Therefore, each area
must be examined based on whether
that area provides an increment of
redundancy that is important to the
conservation of the species.
Adequate representation ensures that
the species’ adaptive capabilities are
conserved. Specifically, the portion
should be evaluated to see how it
contributes to the genetic diversity of
the species. The loss of genetically
based diversity may substantially
reduce the ability of the species to
respond and adapt to future
environmental changes. A peripheral
population may contribute meaningfully
to representation if there is evidence
that it provides genetic diversity due to
its location on the margin of the species’
habitat requirements.
Applying the process described above
for determining whether a species is
threatened in a significant portion of its
range, we next addressed whether any
portions of the range of Erigeron
maguirei warranted further
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
consideration. We noted that, as
discussed in Factor A, there are several
small geographic areas where localized
mineral extraction activities remain as a
potential threat in the foreseeable
future. However, we concluded that
these did not warrant further
consideration because we believe such
activities are unlikely to materialize in
a meaningful way and if they do
materialize, would be limited to small
areas on the periphery of populations
and there was no substantial
information suggesting that these
peripheral areas were significant
portions of the range. Therefore, there is
no substantial information that E.
maguirei in these areas were likely to
become in danger of extinction in the
foreseeable future.
In summary, we have determined that
none of the existing or potential threats,
either alone or in combination with
others, are likely to cause Erigeron
maguirei to become in danger of
extinction within the foreseeable future
throughout all or any significant portion
of its range. On the basis of this
evaluation, we propose to remove E.
maguirei from the List of Endangered
and Threatened Plants (50 CFR 17.12).
Continued activity by the Interagency
Rare Plant Team as well as continued
implementation of protective measures
provided by land management
designations and protections and the
Conservation Strategy should ensure
Erigeron maguirei and its habitat
continue to be protected from loss of
individuals and environmental
degradation. The Post-Delisting
Monitoring Plan, discussed below, will
allow us and our partners to monitor the
species to ensure the status does not
deteriorate, and if a decline is detected,
to take measures to halt the decline so
relisting is not necessary.
Effects of the Proposed Rule
The Act and its implementing
regulations set forth a series of general
prohibitions and exceptions that apply
to all endangered plants. The
prohibitions under section 9(a)(2) of the
Act make it illegal for any person
subject to the jurisdiction of the United
States to import or export, transport in
interstate or foreign commerce in the
course of a commercial activity, sell or
offer for sale in interstate or foreign
commerce, remove and reduce Erigeron
maguirei to possession from areas under
Federal jurisdiction, or remove, cut, dig
up, or damage or destroy E. maguirei on
any other area in knowing violation of
any State law or regulation such as a
trespass law. Section 7 of the Act
requires that Federal agencies consult
with us to ensure that any action
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
authorized, funded, or carried out by
them is not likely to jeopardize the
species’ continued existence. If E.
maguirei is removed from the List of
Endangered and Threatened Plants,
these prohibitions would no longer
apply. Delisting E. maguirei is expected
to have positive effects in terms of
management flexibility to the States and
Federal governments. Federal agencies
will continue to implement
management plans to conserve E.
maguirei and its habitat.
Post-Delisting Monitoring
Section 4(g)(1) of the Act requires us
to monitor for at least 5 years species
that are delisted due to recovery. Postdelisting monitoring refers to activities
undertaken to verify that a species
delisted due to recovery remains secure
from the risk of extinction after the
protections of the Act no longer apply.
The primary goal of post-delisting
monitoring is to monitor the species to
ensure that its status does not
deteriorate, and if a decline is detected,
to take measures to halt the decline so
that proposing it as threatened or
endangered is not again needed. If at
any time during the monitoring period,
data indicate that protective status
under the Act should be reinstated, we
can initiate listing procedures,
including, if appropriate, emergency
listing.
Section 4(g) explicitly requires
cooperation with the States in
development and implementation of
post-delisting monitoring programs. In
early 2007, we asked the State of Utah
to be a cooperator in Post-Delisting
monitoring. In a letter dated March 6,
2007, the State suggested their
participation in post-delisting
monitoring was unnecessary (Harja
2007).
We have prepared a draft PostDelisting Monitoring Plan for Erigeron
maguirei (Service 2007). The draft Plan
(1) summarizes the species’ status at the
time of delisting; (2) defines thresholds
or triggers for potential monitoring
outcomes and conclusions; (3) lays out
frequency and duration of monitoring;
(4) articulates monitoring methods
including sampling considerations; (5)
outlines data compilation and reporting
procedures and responsibilities; and (6)
proposes a post-delisting monitoring
implementation schedule including
timing and responsible parties. The
draft Post-Delisting Monitoring Plan was
modeled after the Conservation Strategy
and incorporated the Maguire Daisy
Survey Protocol developed and tested
by the Interagency Rare Plant Team
(Clark 2006b).
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Through this combined proposed
delisting rule and notice, we announce
the Plan’s availability for public review.
The draft Post-Delisting Monitoring Plan
can be viewed in its entirety at: https://
mountain-prairie.fws.gov/species/
plants/maguiredaisy/. Copies can also
be obtained from the Utah field office
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section). We seek information, data, and
comments from the public regarding
Erigeron maguirei and the post-delisting
monitoring strategy. We are also seeking
peer review of this Plan concurrently
with this comment period. We
anticipate finalizing this Plan,
considering all public and peer review
comments, prior to making a final
determination on the proposed delisting
rule.
Peer Review
In accordance with our joint policy
published in the Federal Register on
July 1, 1994 (59 FR 34270), and the
Office of Management and Budget’s
Final Information Quality Bulletin for
Peer Review, dated December 16, 2004,
we will seek the expert opinions of at
least five appropriate and independent
specialists regarding the science in this
proposed rule and our Post-Delisting
Monitoring Plan. We will invite these
peer reviewers to comment, during the
public comment period, on the specific
assumptions and conclusions regarding
the proposed delisting and the approach
laid out in our Post-Delisting
Monitoring Plan. We will consider all
comments and information received
during the comment period on this
proposed rule and our Post-Delisting
Monitoring Plan during preparation of a
final rulemaking. Accordingly, the final
decision may differ from this proposal.
Clarity of the Rule
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Executive Order 12866 requires each
agency to write regulations that are easy
to understand. We invite your
comments on how to make this rule
easier to understand including answers
to questions such as the following: (1)
Are the requirements in the document
clearly stated? (2) Does the proposed
rule contain technical language or
jargon that interferes with its clarity? (3)
Does the format of the proposed rule
(grouping and order of sections, use of
headings, paragraphing, etc.) aid or
reduce its clarity? (4) Would the rule be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
28423
easier to understand if it were divided
into more (but shorter) sections? (5) Is
the description of the proposed rule in
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of the preamble helpful in
understanding the document? (6) What
else could we do to make the proposed
rule easier to understand?
Send a copy of any written comments
about how we could make this rule
easier to understand to Office of
Regulatory Affairs, Department of the
Interior, Room 7229, 1849 C Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20240. You also
may e-mail the comments to this
address Exsec@ios.doi.gov.
monitored by Capitol Reef, Fishlake
National Forest, and the BLM Price
Field Office in accordance with the
Conservation Strategy. We do not
anticipate a need to request data or
other information from 10 or more
persons during any 12-month period to
satisfy monitoring information needs. If
it becomes necessary to collect
information from 10 or more nonFederal individuals, groups, or
organizations per year, we will first
obtain information collection approval
from OMB.
National Environmental Policy Act
We have determined that an
Environmental Assessment or an
Environmental Impact Statement, as
defined under the authority of the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, need not be prepared in
connection with regulations adopted
pursuant to section 4(a) of the Act. We
published a notice outlining our reasons
for this determination in the Federal
Register on October 25, 1983 (48 FR
49244).
A complete list of all references cited
in this document is available upon
request from the Field Supervisor, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, West Valley
City, Utah (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) regulations at 5 CFR 1320
implement provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S. C. 3501 et seq.).
The OMB regulations at 5 CFR 1320.3(c)
define a collection of information as the
obtaining of information by or for an
agency by means of identical questions
posed to, or identical reporting,
recordkeeping, or disclosure
requirements imposed on, 10 or more
persons. Furthermore, 5 CFR
1320.3(c)(4) specifies that ‘‘ten or more
persons’’ refers to the persons to whom
a collection of information is addressed
by the agency within any 12-month
period. For purposes of this definition,
employees of the Federal government
are not included. The Service may not
conduct or sponsor, and you are not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
This rule does not contain any
collections of information that require
approval by OMB under the Paperwork
Reduction Act. As proposed under the
Post-Delisting Monitoring section above,
Erigeron maguirei populations will be
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
References Cited
Author
The primary authors of this document
are staff located at the Ecological
Services Utah Field Office, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, West Valley City,
Utah (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT).
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17
Endangered and threatened species,
Exports, Imports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, and
Transportation.
Proposed Regulation Promulgation
Accordingly, we hereby propose to
amend part 17, subchapter B of chapter
I, title 50 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, as set forth below:
PART 17—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 17
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361–1407; 16 U.S.C.
1531–1544; 16 U.S.C. 4201–4245; Pub. L. 99–
625, 100 Stat. 3500; unless otherwise noted.
§ 17.12
[Amended]
2. Amend § 17.12(h) by removing the
entry ‘‘Erigeron maguirei’’ under
‘‘FLOWERING PLANTS’’ from the List
of Endangered and Threatened Plants.
Dated: April 16, 2008.
Kenneth Stansell,
Acting Director, Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. E8–9282 Filed 5–15–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 96 (Friday, May 16, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28410-28423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-9282]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[FWS-R6-ES-2008-0001; 92220-1113-0000-C6]
RIN 1018-AU67
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Removal
of Erigeron maguirei From the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened
Plants; Availability of Post-Delisting Monitoring Plan
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.), propose to remove the plant Erigeron maguirei (commonly referred
to as Maguire daisy) from the List of Endangered and Threatened Plants.
The best scientific and commercial data available indicate that this
species has recovered and no longer meets the definition of threatened
or endangered under the Act. Our review of the status of this species
shows that populations are stable, threats have been addressed, and
adequate regulatory mechanisms ensure the species is not currently and
is not likely to again become an endangered species within the
foreseeable future in all or a significant portion of its range. We
seek information, data, and comments from the public regarding E.
maguirei, this proposal to delist, and the Post-Delisting Monitoring
Plan. This proposed rule completes the 5-year status review initiated
on April 7, 2006 (71 FR 17900).
DATES: We will accept comments received or postmarked on or before July
15, 2008. Public hearing requests must be received by June 30, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public Comments Processing,
Attn: RIN 1018-AU67; Division of Policy and Directives Management; U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 222; Arlington,
VA 22203.
We will not accept e-mail or faxes. We will post all comments on
https://www.regulations.gov. This generally means that we will post any
personal information you provide us (see the Public Comments section
below for more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Crist, Field Supervisor, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Utah Field Office, 2369 West Orton Circle,
West Valley City, UT 84119, or telephone (801) 975-3330. Individuals
who are hearing-impaired or speech-impaired may call the Federal Relay
Service at (800) 877-8337 for TTY assistance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Comments Solicited
We intend that any final action resulting from this proposal will
be as accurate and as effective as possible. Therefore, we hereby
request data, comments, new information, or suggestions from the
public, other concerned governmental agencies, the scientific
community, Tribes, industry, or any other interested party concerning
this proposed rule. We particularly seek comments concerning:
(1) Biological information concerning this species;
(2) Relevant data concerning any current or likely future threats
(or lack thereof) to this species, including the extent and adequacy of
Federal and State protection and management that would be provided to
the Erigeron maguirei as a delisted species;
(3) Additional information concerning the range, distribution,
population size, and population trends of this species, including the
locations of any additional populations of this species;
(4) Current or planned activities in the subject area and their
possible impacts on this species; and
(5) Our draft Post-Delisting Monitoring Plan.
You may submit your comments and materials concerning this proposed
rule by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. We will not
accept comments sent by e-mail or fax or to an address not listed in
the ADDRESSES section.
If you submit a comment via https://www.regulations.gov, your entire
comment--including any personal identifying information--will be posted
on the Web site. If you submit a hardcopy comment that includes
personal identifying information, you may request at the top of your
document that we withhold this information from public review. However,
we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. We will post all
hardcopy comments on https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments and materials we receive, as well as supporting
documentation we used in preparing this proposed rule, will be
available for public inspection on https://www.regulations.gov, or by
appointment during normal business hours at the Utah Field Office, 2369
West Orton Circle, West Valley City, UT 84119 (801/975-3330).
Public Hearing
The Act provides for one or more public hearings on this proposal,
if requested. Requests must be received by June 30, 2008. Such requests
must be made in writing and addressed to the Field Supervisor (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section).
Previous Federal Action
Section 12 of the Act directed the Secretary of the Smithsonian
Institution to prepare a report on those plants considered to be
endangered, threatened, or extinct. On July 1, 1975, the Service
published a notice in the Federal Register (40 FR 27824) accepting the
Smithsonian report as a petition to list taxa named therein under
section 4(c)(2) (now 4(b)(3)) of the Act) and announced our intention
to review the status of those plants. Erigeron maguirei was included in
that report (40 FR 27880, July 1, 1975). Maguire daisy is the common
name for Erigeron maguirei, however we will use primarily the
scientific name of this species throughout this proposed rule to
clarify taxonomic issues or the legal status of the plant.
On June 16, 1976, we published a rule in the Federal Register (41
FR 24524) to designate approximately 1,700 vascular plant species,
including Erigeron maguirei, as endangered pursuant to section 4 of the
Act. The 1978 amendments to the Act required that all proposals over 2
years old be withdrawn. On December 10, 1979, we published a notice of
withdrawal (44 FR 70796) of that portion of the June 16, 1976, proposal
that had not been made final, which included E maguirei.
On December 15, 1980, we published a revised notice of review for
native plants in the Federal Register designating Erigeron maguirei as
a candidate species (45 FR 82480). Section 4(b)(3)(B) of the 1982
[[Page 28411]]
amendments to the Act required that the Secretary of the Interior make
a finding on a petition within 1 year of its receipt. In addition,
section 2(b)(1) of the 1982 amendments to the Act required that all
petitions pending as of October 13, 1982, be treated as if newly
submitted on that date. Since the 1975 Smithsonian report was accepted
as a petition, all the taxa contained in those notices, including E.
maguirei, were treated as being newly petitioned as of October 13,
1982. On October 13, 1983, the Service made a 12-month finding that the
petition to list E. maguirei var. maguirei was warranted but precluded
by other listing actions of a higher priority. Notification of this
finding was published in the Federal Register on November 28, 1983 (48
FR 53640).
On July 27, 1984, the Service published a proposed rule to
designate Erigeron maguirei var. maguirei as an endangered species (49
FR 30211). The final rule designating the variety of the species as
endangered was published on September 5, 1985 (50 FR 36089).
In 1983, E. maguirei var. harrisonii was described as a separate
variety of E. maguirei. In this description, Welsh (1983a, p. 367)
noted two previous collections of the variety at canyon bottom sites in
Wayne County, Utah, in the 1930s. On September 27, 1985, the Service
published a notice of review for plants (50 FR 39526) which included
Erigeron maguirei var. harrisonii as a candidate species (50 FR 39548).
Erigeron maguirei var. harrisonii remained as a candidate through the
revised plant notice of review published on September 30, 1993 (58 FR
51144).
On September 7, 1994 (59 FR 46219), the Service proposed to
reclassify the species from endangered to threatened based on the new
genetic information that led to a taxonomic revision, changing the
entry for Erigeron maguirei var. maguirei to E. maguirei. The proposed
rule noted that this entity also included the plant variety formerly
known as E. m. var harrisonii.
On June 19, 1996, the Service finalized the rule reclassifying
Maguire daisy from endangered to threatened in large part due to a
taxonomic revision and resultant increase in the population considered
as Erigeron maguirei (61 FR 31054).
Species Information
A member of the sunflower family, Erigeron maguirei is a perennial
herb with a branched woody base. Its stems and spatulate-shaped leaves
are densely spreading and hairy. Its flowers are dime sized with white
or pink petals. Bits of sand commonly cling to the hairs of the leaves
and stems. The species is further described in our June 19, 1996, final
rule reclassifying the species as threatened (61 FR 31054).
Erigeron maguirei has been located from 1,585 to 2,621 meters (m)
(5,200 to 8,600 feet (ft)) in elevation (Clark et al. 2006, pp. 9-11).
Highest plant densities occur on mesa tops between 1,829 and 2,134 m
(6,000 and 7,000 ft) in elevation (Kass 1990, p. 27; Service 1995, p.
2; Clark 2001, p. 15; Clark et al. 2006, p. 14).
The species occurs from the San Rafael Swell in Emery County, Utah,
south into Wayne and Garfield Counties, Utah, through the Waterpocket
Fold in Capitol Reef National Park (Capitol Reef) (Heil 1987, p. 5,
figure 5; Heil 1989, p. 26; Kass 1990, pp. 23, 26-27; Harper and Van
Buren 1998, appendix A; Clark 2001, p. 3; Clark 2002, pp. 13-14; Clark
et al. 2005, p. 7; Clark et al. 2006, p. 7) (see Figure 1). Erigeron
maguirei occurs primarily on the Navajo Sandstone formation.
Individuals have been located within steep, narrow, dry, rocky, and
sandy canyon or wash bottoms of the Wingate, Chinle, and Navajo
Sandstone formations; sandstone walls of the Wingate, Navajo, and
Cutler formations; cracks of large boulders; slickrock; and atop mesas
of the Navajo Sandstone formation (Cronquist 1947, p. 165; Anderson
1982, pp. 1-2; Heil 1989, pp. 25-26; Kass 1990, p. 22; Harper and Van
Buren 1998, p. 1). Populations within canyon bottoms are apparently
established from seeds dispersed by wind or overland flow from source
populations on the mesa tops (Heil 1989, p. 25; Kass 1990, p. 27;
Service 1995, p. 2). These canyon populations are generally small
compared with those on the mesa tops (Heil 1989, p. 25; Kass 1990, p.
27; Service 1995, p. 2).
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
[[Page 28412]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16MY08.017
BILLING CODE 4310-55-C
Erigeron maguirei has been found primarily in the Dwarf Mountain
Mahogany Slickrock plant community, a community endemic to the Colorado
Plateau Region (Heil 1989, p. 23; Clark 2001, pp. 15-16; Clark et al.
2006, p. 15). E. maguirei also is associated with pinyon/juniper--tall
shrub, ponderosa pine--tall shrub slickrock pockets, mesic canyon
bottoms, mountain shrub, and intermittent riparian communities (Kass
1990, p. 22; Harper and Van Buren 1998, p. 1; Clark 2002, pp. 15-16;
Clark et al. 2005, p. 7; Clark et al. 2006, p. 15).
Flowering occurs from May to June and takes 4 to 6 weeks to go from
the small green ``button'' bud stage to completion of anthesis, when
the flower is no longer open and functional (Alston and Tepedino 2005,
p. 54; Clark et al. 2006, p. 17). It appears that Erigeron maguirei
lacks self-compatibility, and that pollinators are necessary for cross
pollination to occur (Alston and Tepedino 2005, p. 61). Because of the
open nature of the flower head, E. maguirei tends to be visited by
opportunistic insects searching for nectar (Alston and Tepedino 2005,
p. 60). Pollinators include various flies, wasps, and bees (Alston and
Tepedino 2005, p. 60).
Van Buren and Harper (2002, p. 1) collected demographic data on
three Erigeron maguirei populations for a period of 9 years. The
demographic data collected included plant diameter, size class, plant
height, plant condition, and number of flower heads produced for
individual tagged plants (Van Buren and Harper 2002, p. 2). At the
Eagle Canyon study site, 124 plants were tagged in 1992 and 41 of these
were still alive in 2001 (Van Buren and Harper 2002, pp. 2-3). This
demographic monitoring study suggests the species is long lived, has a
low mortality rate, and has the ability to replace individuals at a
rate that compensates for mortality (Van Buren and Harper 2002, pp. 2-
5). Overall, monitored populations appear stable (Van Buren and Harper
2002, p. 2).
[[Page 28413]]
Recovery
Recovery plans are not regulatory documents and are instead
intended to provide guidance to the Service, States, and other partners
on methods of minimizing threats to listed species and on criteria that
may be used to determine when recovery is achieved. There are many
paths to accomplishing recovery of a species, and recovery may be
achieved without all criteria being fully met. For example, one or more
criteria may have been exceeded while other criteria may not have been
accomplished. In that instance, the Service may judge that the threats
have been minimized sufficiently, and the species is robust enough to
reclassify from endangered to threatened or to delist. In other cases,
recovery opportunities may have been recognized that were not known at
the time the recovery plan was finalized. These opportunities may be
used instead of methods identified in the recovery plan. Likewise,
information on the species may be learned that was not known at the
time the recovery plan was finalized. The new information may change
the extent that criteria need to be met for recognizing recovery of the
species. Recovery of a species is a dynamic process requiring adaptive
management that may, or may not, fully follow the guidance provided in
a recovery plan.
The Maguire Daisy (Erigeron maguirei) Recovery Plan was approved by
the Service on August 15, 1995. The Recovery Plan outlined three
delisting criteria. These criteria, and the status of the species
relative to these criteria, are outlined below.
Delisting Criterion One--Locate and/or establish additional
populations. Maintain 20 populations which have been demonstrated to be
above minimum viable population levels. Until minimum viable population
levels are determined, it is assumed that the minimum viable population
level will be about 500 individuals (Service 1995, p. ii). At the time
the Recovery Plan was written, the species was known from 7 populations
(32 sites) with the total population estimated at 5,000 (Service 1995,
p. 2). To achieve this criterion, the Recovery Plan recommended land
managers inventory suitable habitat to determine with a reasonable
degree of accuracy its population and distribution (Service 1995, pp.
ii, 6, 7, 12).
Thus, in 1999, the Service, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM),
U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service (Forest Service), and the
National Park Service (NPS) established an Interagency Rare Plant
Agreement to direct conservation measures for listed and sensitive
plant species endemic to central Utah, including Erigeron maguirei
(Clark 2002, p. 3). Through this interagency agreement, the agencies
committed funding to survey and monitor E. maguirei throughout its
range, regardless of agency boundaries (Clark 2002, p. 3). Beginning in
1999, these agencies hired an Interagency Botanist to oversee a team of
seasonal employees, thus creating an Interagency Rare Plant Team
(Forest Service et al. 2006, p. 6). As part of recovery activities for
the E. maguirei, from 1999 to 2002, approximately 3,521 hectares (8,700
acres) were surveyed for E. maguirei on NPS, BLM, and Forest Service
lands (Clark and Clark 1999, p. 45; Clark 2002, p. 13). During this
period, approximately 2,445 person-hours were allocated by the
Interagency Rare Plant Team for E. maguirei surveys (Clark 2002, p.
13).
The recovery criterion of maintaining 20 viable populations was
based primarily on the assumption that numerous small sites would
remain scattered and disconnected (Clark 2006c). Instead of identifying
more populations, increased survey efforts conducted under Action 2.0
in the Recovery Plan identified both broader plant distributions and
larger population sizes that are evenly distributed across the
landscape (Harper and Van Buren 1998, p. 2; Clark and Clark 1999, p.
47; Clark 2001, p. 3; Clark 2002, pp. 13-14; Clark et al. 2005, p. 17;
Clark et al. 2006, p. 17). Based on our current knowledge of the
species, 9 known populations exist (118 sites) within 4 meta-
populations comprised of approximately 164,250 Erigeron maguirei
individuals (see Figure 1 and Table 1) (Clark et al. 2006, p. 16).
Sites are defined as occurrence locations recorded by one or more
researcher over time (Clark 2006b, p. 5). Populations are defined as
groups of occurrence records (i.e., sites) located in the same
geographic vicinity (Clark 2006b, p. 5). A meta-population is comprised
of a number of individual populations less than 2.4 kilometers (1.5
miles) apart, typically linked by continuous suitable habitat (Clark
2006b, p. 5, Clark 2006c). The populations cannot be split into more
than nine separate populations based on any meaningful criteria (Clark
2006c).
The range of the species is currently estimated at approximately
1,010 square kilometers (km) (390 square miles (mi)) and extends from
the San Rafael Swell south through the Waterpocket Fold of Capitol Reef
(see Figure 1) (Clark et al. 2006, p. 17). All three populations within
the Capitol Reef Meta-Population are linked by contiguous suitable
habitat. Although not necessary for recovery, Clark et al. (2006, p.
24) postulated that further survey work would likely find sufficient
numbers of plants to link them into one contiguous population. A
similar situation exists within the San Rafael Swell area where
suitable habitat occurrences are separated by short distances (Clark et
al. 2006, p. 24).
These large, connected, and evenly distributed populations provide
the desired viability intended by the recovery plan. The 9 populations
have more desirable biological attributes than the originally suggested
20 populations in the recovery plan. As mentioned above, the need for
20 populations was based on the assumption that the originally
identified localities would remain widely scattered and the populations
in those localities would remain small. However, the 9 current
populations are well connected within 4 meta-populations, the meta-
populations are distributed throughout the range of the species, and
most of the populations within those meta-populations have large
numbers of individuals. In fact, most of the populations are well above
the minimum viable population size of 500 (see Table 1). Although some
of the individual populations are below the minimum viable population
size, those populations are connected to other populations within meta-
populations, thereby increasing the species' robustness. In addition,
recent population dynamics studies confirm the species' projected
population stability (Van Buren and Harper 2002, pp. 1-5; Clark et al.
2006, p. 24). Demographic monitoring data suggests the species is long
lived, has a low mortality rate, and has the ability to replace
individuals at a rate that compensates for mortality (Van Buren and
Harper 2002, pp. 2-5). The 9 current populations are functionally
better than the estimated 20 populations originally identified in the
recovery plan. Therefore, on the whole, the available data demonstrate
that the intent of this recovery criterion has been met or exceeded.
[[Page 28414]]
Table 1.--Erigeron maguirei Populations, Population Estimates and Protective Land Management Designations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percent of
the
species'
Population Population Number of Land ownership ** Protective range
estimate sites designations ** within the
protective
designation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northern San Rafael Swell Meta-Population
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Calf Canyon *................... 2,000 1 BLM................ ACEC.............. 95
2 SITLA.............. None.............. 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Central San Rafael Swell Meta-Population
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coal Wash....................... 100 6 BLM................ WSA............... 90
ACEC.............. 100
Secret Mesa..................... 9,000 9 BLM................ WSA............... 90
ACEC.............. 100
1,000 2 SITLA.............. None.............. 0
Link Flats...................... 200 4 BLM................ None.............. 0
50 1 SITLA.............. None.............. 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Southern San Rafael Swell Meta-Population
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John's Hole..................... 300 3 BLM................ WSA............... 100
ACEC.............. 10
Seger's Hole.................... 100 2 BLM................ WSA............... 50
ACEC.............. 20
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capitol Reef Meta-Population
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deep Creek...................... 1,500 2 Forest Service..... Proposed Botanical \1\
Area.
100,000 29 NPS................ Primitive and 100
Threshold
Management Zone.
Capitol Reef.................... 30,000 15 NPS................ Primitive and 100
Threshold
Management Zone.
Waterpocket Fold................ 20,000 42 NPS................ Primitive and 100
Threshold
Management Zone.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals...................... 164,250 118 Various............ Various........... 97
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The Calf Canyon population estimate is from 1980. Due to inaccessibility, this site has not been revisited
since 1980 and current population levels are unknown. However, other populations are doing well and there is
no reason to believe that the Calf Canyon population is not also doing well (Clark 2007a). Current
distribution among BLM and SITLA is also unknown although 1980 estimates suggest 25 percent of the range was
on BLM land and 75 percent was on SITLA land.
** SITLA = Utah's School of Public Land Trust; ACEC = Area of Critical Environmental Concern; WSA = Wilderness
Study Area.
\1\ 0% (will be 100% if proposed Botanical Area is finalized).
Delisting Criterion Two--Establish formal land management
designations for these populations which provide long-term, undisturbed
habitat for Maguire daisy (Service 1995, p. ii). Delisting Criterion
Three--Ensure that Maguire daisy and its habitat is protected from loss
of individuals and environmental degradation (Service 1995, p. ii). To
achieve these criteria, the Recovery Plan recommends the Service and
our partners ``document the presence of, or, if necessary, establish
formal land management designations which would provide for long-term
protection for Maguire daisy and its habitat'' (Service 1995, pp. ii,
6, 9, 12).
Approximately 97 percent of the species' range occurs on lands with
substantial protective measures in place (see Table 1). Protections are
afforded to populations occurring in Capitol Reef through the NPS
General Management Plan (Capitol Reef 1998, pp. 27-31). The BLM
provides protections for populations occurring on their lands under the
1991 San Rafael Resource Management Plan (BLM 1991a, pp. 12-26, 63-64).
Most of the habitat on BLM land is protected as Wilderness Study Areas
or Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (see Factor D below). The
BLM Price Field Office is currently proceeding with a revision of the
1991 Resource Management Plan (BLM 2004). The Record of Decision for
the Final Resource Management Plan is scheduled to be completed by the
summer of 2008 (BLM 2008a, p. 1). The Dixie National Forest and
Fishlake National Forest released a draft Land Management Plan
identifying the Billings Pass Botanical Area, which would provide
protection to Erigeron maguirei (Forest Service 2006a, pp. 2c-17, 2c-
18, 2c-43; Tait 2006). At the time of this proposed rule, a schedule
was not available for the completion of this document. The Fishlake
National Forest Off-Highway Vehicle Route Designation Project (Forest
Service 2006b, pp. 13, 20-21) will eliminate cross country travel on
Forest Service lands throughout the range of the species; all habitat
is a minimum of 0.8 km (0.5 mi) from existing or potential motorized
routes on Fishlake National Forest lands (Forest Service 2006c, pp.
123, 260-263).
The Utah State School and Institutional Trust Lands (SITLA) owns
lands that contain less than 2 percent of all known or estimated
Erigeron maguirei plants. While SITLA does not have a specific
management plan to benefit E. maguirei, we do not believe this is
necessary to achieve the recovery criterion.
[[Page 28415]]
Since its 1985 listing, Federal land management agencies have
worked collaboratively to ensure long-term protection of Erigeron
maguirei and its habitat. Land management plans, policies, and
regulations that provide protection to E. maguirei are in place. More
information regarding the protection of E. maguirei through land
management designations is contained within Factor D of the Summary of
Factors Affecting the Species.
To further ensure these efforts continue post-delisting, the
Interagency Rare Plant Team has developed the Central Utah Navajo
Sandstone Endemics Conservation Agreement and Conservation Strategy
(hereafter referred to as the Conservation Strategy), a multi-year
joint project by the Forest Service, BLM, NPS, and the Service (Forest
Service et al. 2006). We believe the Conservation Strategy will ensure
conservation efforts that have occurred for the species since formation
of the Interagency Rare Plant Team in 1999 will continue. The
Conservation Strategy, signed by the Forest Service, BLM, NPS, and the
Service in September 2006, outlines the procedural provisions under
which the Federal agencies will manage Erigeron maguirei into the
foreseeable future (Forest Service et al. 2006, pp. 24-25). In
addition, the Conservation Strategy documents the conservation actions
needed to manage potential factors impacting the species and to promote
the conservation and perpetuation of E. maguirei (Forest Service et al.
2006, pp. 38-47). The Conservation Strategy can be viewed in its
entirety at: https://mountain-prairie.fws.gov/species/plants/
maguiredaisy/. Copies can also be obtained from the Utah field office
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Based on the best available data, we have determined that the
intent of the first criterion has been achieved and the second and
third recovery criterion have been met. Current estimates suggest
approximately 97 percent of all known individuals occur on lands with
formal land management designations that provide for the long-term
protection of the habitat. This ensures Erigeron maguirei and its
habitat are protected from loss of individuals and environmental
degradation.
Summary of Factors Affecting the Species
Section 4 of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR part
424) set forth the procedures for listing species, reclassifying
species, or removing species from listed status. ``Species'' is defined
by the Act as including any species or subspecies of fish or wildlife
or plants, and any distinct vertebrate population segment of fish or
wildlife that interbreeds when mature (16 U.S.C. 1532(16)). Once the
``species'' is determined we then evaluate whether that species may be
endangered or threatened because of one or more of the five factors
described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act. We must consider these same
five factors in delisting a species. We may delist a species according
to 50 CFR 424.11(d) if the best available scientific and commercial
data indicate that the species is neither endangered nor threatened for
the following reasons: (1) The species is extinct; (2) the species has
recovered and is no longer endangered or threatened (as is the case
with the Maguire daisy); and/or (3) the original scientific data used
at the time the species was classified were in error.
A recovered species is one that no longer meets the Act's
definition of threatened or endangered. Determining whether a species
is recovered requires consideration of the same five categories of
threats specified in section 4(a)(1) of the Act. For species that are
already listed as threatened or endangered, this analysis of threats is
an evaluation of both the threats currently facing the species and the
threats that are reasonably likely to affect the species in the
foreseeable future following the delisting or downlisting and the
removal or reduction of the Act's protections.
A species is ``endangered'' for purposes of the Act if it is in
danger of extinction throughout all or a ``significant portion of its
range'' and is ``threatened'' if it is likely to become endangered
within the foreseeable future throughout all or a ``significant portion
of its range.'' The word ``range'' in the significant portion of its
range (SPR) phrase refers to the range in which the species currently
exists. For the purposes of this analysis, we will evaluate whether the
currently listed species, the Erigeron maguirei, should be considered
threatened or endangered. Then we will consider whether there are any
portions of the species' range in danger of extinction or likely to
become endangered within the foreseeable future.
Foreseeable future is determined by the Service on a case-by-case
basis, taking into account a variety of species-specific factors such
as lifespan, genetics, breeding behavior, demography, threat-projection
timeframes, and environmental variability. In this case, we do not
foresee any significant changes in the level of threats for Erigeron
maguirei. Land management designations (described below) provide long-
term security for approximately 97 percent of known plants. Other
factors once thought capable of significantly impacting the species are
now predicted to have little or no impact on the species' long-term
conservation status. While we could consider the species secure in
perpetuity, such a timeframe would introduce an unreasonable level of
uncertainty into our analysis. Therefore, for the purpose of our
analysis, we consider a timeframe over which it would be reasonable to
expect population level or demographic effects to be detected. For the
purposes of this proposed rule, we consider ``foreseeable future'' for
E. maguirei to be up to 30 years. The species has been shown to live
past 9 years of age and may live between 20 and 30 years (Van Buren and
Harper 2002, appendices; England 2007). The available data also
demonstrate that plants may begin flowering as early as 1 year and may
be able to replace themselves within as little as 2 years, depending
upon conditions (Van Buren and Harper 2002, appendices). Consideration
of factors potentially impacting the species for up to 30 years would
incorporate the long life of an individual and allow for up to 15
possible generations. We believe this represents a reasonable
biological timeframe to measure demographic changes that could reflect
potential threat factors.
The following analysis examines all five factors currently
affecting, or that are likely to affect, Erigeron maguirei within the
foreseeable future.
A. The Present or Threatened Destruction, Modification, or Curtailment
of its Habitat or Range
The current range of Erigeron maguirei includes 9 populations (118
sites) within 4 meta-populations across approximately 1,010 square km
(390 square mi) of southeastern Utah. These populations extend from the
San Rafael Swell south through the Waterpocket Fold of Capitol Reef
(see Figure 1) (Clark et al. 2006, p. 17). The three largest
populations, including over 91 percent of all known plants, occur
primarily within Capitol Reef. One of these three populations (Deep
Creek) also includes a small portion, less than 1 percent of all the
known plants, on National Forest lands. The other six populations (Calf
Canyon, Coal Wash, Secret Mesa, Link Flats, John's Hole, and Seger's
Hole) are managed primarily by the BLM. A portion of three of these six
populations (Calf Canyon, Secret Mesa, and Link Flats) also occurs on
Utah's School of Public Land Trust (SITLA) lands. Table
[[Page 28416]]
1 provides further detail on populations and land ownership.
When the species was originally listed, the main threat was loss of
habitat specifically due to mining claims for uranium, energy
exploration, grazing, and off-road vehicle recreation (50 FR 36089-
36091, September 5, 1985). In addition, flooding has also been seen as
a potential threat in the recent years. We address these threats to
Erigeron maguirei below.
Mineral Exploration and Development Overview--Mineral exploration
and development were listed as threats in the 1985 listing, in the 1995
Recovery Plan, and in the 1996 downlisting (50 FR 36089, September 5,
1985; Service 1995, p. 5; 61 FR 31054, 31056, June 19, 1996). Only one
active mine exists within the range of Erigeron maguirei populations
according to the Utah Mineral Occurrence System (Utah Geological Survey
(UGS) 2007; Clark et al. 2006, p. 9). This mine, the Lucky Strike Mine,
is discussed below.
Uranium--Uranium mining began in the western United States in 1871
(Ringholz 1994, p. 2). In 1952, geologist Charles Steen found the first
noteworthy deposits of uranium ore in Utah (Ringholz 1994, p. 2). By
the end of 1962, Utah had produced approximately 9 million tons of ore
(Ringholz 1994, p. 2). The Atomic Energy Commission held ample uranium
ore reserves and by 1970 stopped buying uranium (Ringholz 1994, p. 3).
When nuclear power plants came on-line in the mid-1970s, a brief second
boom was experienced (Ringholz 1994, p. 3). However, foreign
competition, Federal regulations, and nuclear fears led to an
abandonment of domestic uranium mining (Ringholz 1994, p. 3). A recent
surge in prices has led to a resurgence in prospectors staking and
buying up uranium claims.
According to the Utah Mineral Occurrence System database, 12 known
uranium mineral locations overlap the mapped Erigeron maguirei
populations (UGS 2007; Clark et al. 2006, p. 16). Only the Lucky Strike
Mine is active (UGS 2007). This mine occurs along the southern edge of
the mapped Link Flats population (Central San Rafael Swell Meta-
Population) and is accessed via an existing road that enters the
population from the south (UGS 2007; Clark et al. 2006, p. 9). It is
not anticipated that the mine will adversely impact substantial
portions of this population in the foreseeable future as it lies on the
periphery of the population and is accessed via an existing road. The
remaining 11 locations include 6 sites that never produced and 5 sites
that only reached small production levels (UGS 2007). All 11 of these
locations occur on the periphery of the mapped populations (UGS 2007;
Clark et al. 2006, p. 16).
Uranium is restricted to geologic formations such as the Moss Back
Member, Monitor Butte Member, and the Mottled Siltstone Unit of the
Chinle Formation, while the Maguire daisy primarily occurs in the
Navajo Sandstone geologic formation. The most substantial impact of
uranium mining would likely be indirectly from crossing suitable
habitat while accessing the desired geologic formation (Utah Geologic
Survey (UGS) 2007; Clark et al. 2006, p. 20). Based on the locations of
past exploration coupled with the geologic requirements of uranium, we
foresee minimal potential impacts from uranium mining to the species as
a whole in the foreseeable future.
Gypsum--Although not specifically mentioned in any previous Service
threats assessment, gypsum mining also occurs in the vicinity of
Erigeron maguirei. While E. maguirei does not occur in the geologic
formation that contains commercial quality gypsum, suitable habitat may
be crossed while accessing the more desirable geologic formations
(Clark et al. 2006, p. 20). According to the Utah Mineral Occurrence
System database, one gypsum occurrence that never produced lies within
the mapped Deep Creek population within Capitol Reef (UGS 2007). This
occurrence is located on the periphery of the mapped population and
within the Primitive Management Zone (Capitol Reef 1998, p. 27; UGS
2007). NPS regulations protect this population by limiting access
(Capitol Reef 1998, p. 27). Travel through this Management Zone is
limited to cross-country hiking or horseback riding on unimproved
trails and routes (Capitol Reef 1998, pp. 28-29). Within the Primitive
Management Zone, developments are not permitted and physical
modifications are not allowed except for natural or cultural resource
protection (Capitol Reef 1998, p. 29). More importantly, lands are
withdrawn from mining and mineral exploration in Capitol Reef (Clark et
al. 2006, p. 21). Therefore, gypsum mining impacts to the E. maguirei
are not likely in the foreseeable future.
Oil Shale and Tar Sands--The Conservation Strategy does not
recognize oil shale and tar sands as a threat (Forest Service et al.
2006, p. 37). However, the mapped populations of Calf Canyon, Secret
Mesa, and Link Flats overlap the mapped tar sand areas as depicted on
the Energy Resources Map of Utah (Automated Geographic Reference Center
(AGRC) 2001a, 2001b; Clark et al. 2006, p. 9). Tar sands are a mixture
of sand or clay, water, and extremely heavy crude oil. Typically, strip
mining is the most efficient method of extraction, but other approaches
include the injection of steam and/or solvents to reduce the oils
viscosity allowing the oil to be pumped out of the well.
Ten percent of the mapped Calf Canyon population overlaps that of
the mapped high probability tar sand areas and probable tar sand areas
(AGRC 2001b; Clark et al. 2006, p. 9). The Secret Mesa population
contains a small area of tar sands (AGRC 2001a; Clark et al. 2006, p.
9). The Link Flats population contains a small area of tar sands, and
approximately 2 percent of the mapped area overlaps that of the mapped
probable and highly probable tar sand areas (AGRC 2001a, 2001b; Clark
et al. 2006, p. 9). Portions of the mapped Calf Canyon, Secret Mesa,
and Link Flats populations have been identified in the Draft Oil Shale
and Tar Sands Resource Management Plan Amendments to Address Land Use
Allocations in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming and Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement (BLM 2007, pp. 3-127 and 3-163; Clark et
al. 2006, p. 9). The purpose of the draft programmatic Environmental
Impact Statement is to describe where oil shale and tar sands resources
are present, and to decide which areas will be open to application for
commercial leasing, exploration, and development (BLM 2007, pp. 1-2).
The final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement is expected to be
published in 2008 (BLM 2008b). A final determination on this proposed
delisting rule will not be completed until the programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement is finalized; and the Record of Decision
will be analyzed as part of our final determination. If tar sands
development does occur in the San Rafael Swell area, the loss of
significant portions of these populations from this activity is not
anticipated because the mineral resources occur along the periphery of
the mapped populations and only contain a small percentage of the
mapped area.
Impacts to individual plants from tar sands development may still
occur. These impacts can be a result of vegetation clearing, habitat
fragmentation, alteration of topography, changes in drainage patters,
erosion, sedimentation from runoff, oil and contaminant spills,
fugitive dust, injury or mortality of individual plants, human
collection, increased human access, spread of invasive plant species,
and air pollution (BLM 2007, pp. 5-77). In addition, we believe the
development of
[[Page 28417]]
tar sands may also impact pollinator species. Given where development
is likely to occur and the locations of where plants occur, we expect
impacts to the species to be minor.
Additionally, protective land management designations apply to the
Secret Mesa population. Ninety percent of the BLM portion of the mapped
Secret Mesa population occurs within Sid's Mountain and Devils Canyon
WSAs (Clark et al. 2005, pp. 16-17; Ivory 2006). As stated previously,
WSAs are designated as primitive-class areas and are to be managed free
of evidence of human use and to maintain an environment of isolation
(BLM 1991a, p. 89). Only temporary uses, and those that create no new
surface disturbance nor involve permanent placement of structures, are
permitted within WSAs (BLM 1976, p. 2). All WSAs are closed to use and
development of minerals (BLM 1991a, pp. 19, 64).
Oil and Gas Exploration and Development--Oil and gas exploration
and development were listed as threats in the listing rule, Recovery
Plan, and downlisting rule (50 FR 36089, September 5, 1985; Service
1995, p. 5; 61 FR 31054, 31056, June 19, 1996). Oil and gas leases were
located in the area of the last known Erigeron maguirei site at the
time of the 1985 listing (50 FR 36090, September 5, 1985).
Lands within Capitol Reef have been withdrawn from oil and gas
exploration and development (Forest Service et al. 2006, p. 56). The
BLM and Forest Service lands are open to oil and gas leasing, but the
potential for oil and gas is low in the Navajo Sandstone formation
where Erigeron maguirei occurs (Forest Service et al. 2006, p. 34).
Within BLM-administered mineral resources, oil and gas leases that
were issued prior to the BLM Resource Management Plan are managed under
the stipulations that were in effect when the lease was issued (BLM
1991a, p. 11). Any leases issued after the Plan was signed must comply
with the Resource Management Plan (BLM 1991a, p. 11, map 5). The Plan
identifies specific management prescriptions by ACEC (BLM 1991a, pp.
14-15). The known Erigeron maguirei populations on BLM administered
lands occur within the San Rafael Canyon (middle portion), Sid's
Mountain, Highway I-70 Scenic Corridor, Muddy Creek, and Seger's Hole
ACECs (Clark et al. 2005, pp. 16-17; Ivory 2006). The San Rafael Canyon
ACEC (middle portion) is open to leasing, but surface restrictions
apply (BLM 1991a, p. 14). According to the Conservation Strategy, BLM
will adjust surface disturbance locations to avoid E. maguirei for
discretionary and leasable minerals including the San Rafael Canyon
ACEC (middle portion) (Forest Service et al. 2006, pp. 34, 36-38, 42-
44). The remaining ACECs that contain E. maguirei populations have no-
surface-occupancy stipulations for oil and gas development attached to
the lease (BLM 1991a, p. 14). Leasing with ``no surface occupancy''
means that there will be no development or disturbance whatsoever of
the land surface, including establishment of wells or well pads, and
construction of roads, pipelines, or powerlines. WSAs with E. maguirei
populations, including the Sid's Mountain, Devils Canyon, and Muddy
Creek WSAs, are open for leasing, but also have no-surface-occupancy
stipulations (BLM 1991a, pp. 14, 64).
Seven wells have been sited within the mapped Secret Mesa and Coal
Wash populations, but all of them have been plugged and abandoned
(Clark et al. 2006, p. 9; Utah Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining (UDOGM)
2006a). While limited exploration has occurred, no known oil or gas
fields exist within the known Erigeron maguirei populations and the
potential for development is low (AGRC 2001c; Clark et al. 2006, p. 21;
UDOGM 2006b, Forest Service et al. 2006, p. 34). The only gas field in
the vicinity of the E. maguirei is the Last Chance Gas Field located
approximately 11 km (7 mi) west of the Seger's Hole population and 10
km (6 mi) north of the Deep Creek population (AGRC 2001c; Chidsey et
al. 2005; Clark et al. 2006, p. 16; UDOGM 2006b). Based on the lack of
supporting evidence of viable oil and gas fields within the vicinity of
the E. maguirei and the land management designations affording
protections to the species, oil and gas exploration and development is
no longer considered a threat, nor is it likely to become one within
the foreseeable future.
Recreational Use--Recreational use, including off-road vehicles and
human foot traffic, have previously been cited as threats to the
species (50 FR 36090, September 5, 1985; Service 1995, p. 5; 61 FR
31056, June 19, 1996). Erigeron maguirei habitat does not occur within
0.8 km (0.5 mi) of classified or potentially designated motorized
routes on Fishlake National Forest lands (Forest Service 2006c, pp.
123, 260-263). According to the Fishlake National Forest Off-Highway
Vehicle Route Designation Project, it is unlikely that motorized
traffic would infringe upon the E. maguirei population on Forest
Service land, thereby, providing protections from this threat to this
portion of the species' range (Forest Service 2006c, p. 263). Capitol
Reef, which comprises 91 percent of the species' total population, is
closed to off-road vehicle use (Clark et al. 2006, p. 20).
Almost 6 percent of individual plants occur on lands administered
by the BLM, of which approximately 80 percent occur within an ACEC and/
or WSA (Kass 1990, p. 23; BLM 1991a, pp. 63-64; Clark et al. 2006, p.
18; Ivory 2006). Four of the six Erigeron maguirei populations that
occur on BLM lands are within the Sid's Mountain, Muddy Creek, and
Devils Canyon WSA (Kass 1990, p. 23; Clark et al. 2005, p. 19; Ivory
2006). These WSAs are either closed to motorized vehicles or use is
limited to designated roads and trails (BLM 1991a, pp. 63-64, 68, 89;
Clark et al. 2006, p. 20). San Rafael Canyon (middle portion), Sid's
Mountain, Highway I-70 Scenic Corridor, Muddy Creek, and Seger's Hole
ACECs contain five of the six known populations on BLM lands (Clark et
al. 2005, pp. 16-17; Ivory 2006). These areas have either been closed
to off-road vehicle use or use has been limited to designated roads and
trails (BLM 1991a, p. 68).
Erigeron maguirei is not prone to human disturbance because it
grows primarily in cliff crevices and on sandstone domes (Clark 2002,
p. 16). From 2000 to 2002, 60 sites were included within a Capitol Reef
study on signs of human impacts (Clark 2002, pp. 12-16). Only 2 of
these sites showed any signs of human impacts (in both cases foot
traffic through the site) (Clark 2002, pp. 15-16). At one site
monitored with an electronic counter, visitor use remained fairly
stable at 10 visitors per week (Clark et al. 2006, p. 21). After over a
decade of monitoring, human trampling may have impacted some
individuals, but has not led to a reduction in population survivability
(Clark et al. 2006, p. 21). Therefore, impacts from recreation are not
a threat to E. maguirei populations in the foreseeable future.
Floods--Two of four Capitol Reef sites monitored between 1992 and
2001 have experienced flash flood events (Van Buren and Harper 2002, p.
1). At one site, a flash flood event likely resulted in 48 plants being
lost (Van Buren and Harper 2002, p. 2). However, the species is long
lived and shows an ability to replace individuals lost to periodic
flooding (Van Buren and Harper 2002, pp. 4-5). Therefore, flood events
possessing the potential to meaningfully impact Erigeron maguirei
populations are unlikely in the foreseeable future.
Summary of Factor A--Mineral exploration and development, and
recreational use were listed as threats to Erigeron maguirei in the
1985 listing
[[Page 28418]]
rule, 1995 Recovery Plan, and 1996 downlisting rule (50 FR 36089,
September 5, 1985; Service 1995, p. 5; 61 FR 31054, June 19, 1996).
Since the last Federal action, recovery efforts have increased our
understanding of the species, its habitat, and its distribution and
abundance (61 FR 31054-31058, June 19, 1996; Harper and Van Buren 1998,
p. 2; Clark and Clark 1999, p. 47; Clark 2001, p. 3; Clark 2002, pp.
13-14; Clark et al. 2005, p. 17; Clark et al. 2006, p. 17). The species
occurs predominantly within the Navajo Sandstone formation, which has
low potential for oil and gas development and uranium mining (Forest
Service et al. 2006, p. 37). Most mineral resources (like gypsum, tar
sands, and oil shale) occur on the periphery of mapped populations and,
therefore, are not likely to meaningfully impact any of the
populations. Impacts from fragmentation are also expected to be minor.
Land management protections throughout most of the species' range and
an increased understanding of the species' habitat have reduced the
threat of recreational use. While potential impacts to individuals
could occur when either accessing the mineral resources or during
recreational use, these activities are considered unlikely to
materialize in a meaningful way in the foreseeable future, would be
limited to small periphery portions of populations, and would not
reduce the long-term viability of any of the populations. In addition,
land management designations, which have been discussed briefly in this
section and will be discussed in more detail under Factor D, will
continue to provide protections for E. maguirei and its habitat in the
foreseeable future.
B. Overutilization for Commercial, Recreational, Scientific, or
Educational Purposes
Erigeron maguirei is not a highly collected or sought-after
species. One group was known to be propagating E. maguirei for private
use (a European group was propagating E. maguirei for rock garden
enthusiasts) (Forest Service et al. 2006, p. 35; Clark 2007b), but no
longer appears to be offering plants for sale (Megown 2007). To date,
unauthorized plant and seed collection has not been documented for this
species (Forest Service et al. 2006, p. 35). Although the Interagency
Rare Plant Team working under the Conservation Strategy will continue
to monitor for illegal collection activity (Forest Service et al. 2006,
p. 35), we do not believe overutilization to be a current threat to the
species, nor likely to be in the foreseeable future.
C. Disease or Predation
At the time of listing, plants were observed only in rocky areas
inaccessible to cattle grazing (50 FR 36090, September 5, 1985), and
not in canyon bottoms where plants were originally located in 1940 and
1980. Because the plants could not be relocated in the canyon bottoms,
scientists believed that predation due to cattle grazing had reduced
the species' distribution (50 FR 36090, September 5, 1985; 61 FR 31056,
June 19, 1996; Harper and Van Buren 1998, p. 2). By the time the
Recovery Plan was drafted, it concluded that the majority of the
Erigeron maguirei populations were relatively secure from direct
impacts of livestock trampling, but it could be a localized threat in
some areas (Service 1995, p. 5). We concluded in the final downlisting
rule that concentrations of livestock in localized areas, specifically
wash bottoms that have limited vegetation, may result in E. maguirei
being grazed by livestock (61 FR 31056, June 19, 1996; Kass 1990, p.
28). The species is now known to prefer cliffs or rock crevices that
are inaccessible to livestock (Kass 1990, p. 27; Service 1995, p. 2;
Clark 2001, p. 15; Clark et al. 2005, pp. 12, 22, 24; Clark et al.
2006, pp. 21-22; Forest Service et al. 2006, p. 56). Erigeron maguirei
plants within canyon bottoms are small, incidental occurrences,
apparently established from seeds dispersed by wind or overland flow
from source populations on the mesa tops (Heil 1989, p. 25; Kass 1990,
p. 27; Service 1995, p. 2).
Although seven of the nine Erigeron maguirei populations occur
within cattle allotments, all seven of these populations are
inaccessible to cattle grazing due to terrain conditions (Forest
Service et al. 2006, p. 56). Of the two remaining populations, the
Waterpocket Fold population in Capitol Reef, estimated at approximately
20,000 individuals on 42 sites, has a history of cattle trailing
(Forest Service et al. 2006, p. 56). Cattle trailing, or moving cattle
through the area, has occurred at this site about once every 5 years
for the past 100 years (Clark et al. 2006, pp. 21, 25). Cattle trailing
has impacted, and is expected to continue to impact, only a few
individual plants (Clark et al. 2006, pp. 21, 25). The Conservation
Strategy states that Capitol Reef will monitor for potential impacts as
well as identify and implement management actions and guidelines that
will help maintain long-term sustainability and conservation of the
population (Forest Service et al. 2006, pp. 35-37). Additionally,
grazing range improvements outside of the range of E. maguirei serve to
draw cattle further away from E. maguirei populations (Clark et al.
2006, pp. 21, 25). Because we now know that E. maguirei primarily
occurs in areas inaccessible to livestock, in combination with the
increased population and distribution, grazing is no longer considered
a threat, nor is it likely to become one within the foreseeable future.
D. The Inadequacy of Existing Regulatory Mechanisms
Prior to the species' 1985 listing, no Federal or State laws
protected Erigeron maguirei (50 FR 36090, September 5, 1985). Since
then, substantial protections have been secured. The BLM Management
Plan has provided protection to E. maguirei and its habitat in the San
Rafael Swell areas (BLM 1991a; 61 FR 31056, June 19, 1996). The
completion and implementation of the National Park Service Capitol Reef
Management Plan has provided protection to the largest populations of
E. maguirei and its habitat (61 FR 31056, June 19, 1996). Habitat for
E. maguirei does not occur within 0.8 km (0.5 mi) of classified or
potentially designated motorized routes on Fishlake National Forest
lands (Forest Service 2006c, pp. 123, 260-263). In addition, the
proposed Fishlake National Forest Management Plan would afford
protections to the remaining portions of the Capitol Reef Meta-
Population through the designation of the Billings Pass Botanical Area
(Forest Service 2006a, pp. 2c-17, 2c-18, 2c-43; Tait 2006).
Over 98 percent of known Erigeron maguirei plants occur on lands
managed by Capitol Reef (91 percent), BLM Price Field Office (6
percent), and Fishlake National Forest (1 percent) (Clark et al. 2006,
p. 16) (Table 1). Less than 2 percent of the known population occurs on
lands administered by SITLA where no protections for E. maguirei exist
(Clark et al. 2006, p. 16) (Table 1).
On BLM lands, WSAs are managed according to the Interim Management
Policy for Lands under Wilderness Review, BLM Handbook 8550-1, until
Congress either designates them into the National Wilderness
Preservation System or releases them from wilderness study for other
purposes (BLM 1976, p. 1). In 1991, BLM recommended to Congress that:
100 percent of the Muddy Creek WSA be made permanent wilderness; 99
percent of the Sid's Mountain WSA be made permanent wilderness; and
none of the Devils Canyon WSA be made permanent wilderness (BLM 1991b,
pp. 795, 807, 817). The Devils Canyon WSA includes approximately 10
percent of the BLM portion of the Secret Mesa population
[[Page 28419]]
(Ivory 2007). Given BLM's support for the permanent protection of the
majority of the WSAs where Erigeron maguirei occurs, we believe
Congressional release from the National Wilderness Preservation System
is unlikely.
Four of the six known populations of Erigeron maguirei that occur
on lands administered by the BLM are within the Muddy Creek, Sid's
Mountain, and Devils Canyon WSA (Kass 1990, p. 23; BLM 1991a, pp. 63-
64; Clark et al. 2005, p. 19; Ivory 2006). One-hundred percent of the
John's Hole and 50 percent of the Seger's Hole populations occur within
the Muddy Creek WSA (Clark et al. 2006, p. 16; Ivory 2006). Ninety
percent of the Coal Wash population occurs within the Sid's Mountain
WSA (Clark et al. 2006, p. 16; Ivory 2006). Ninety percent of the
portion of the Secret Mesa population on BLM lands occurs within the
Sid's Mountain and Devils Canyon WSAs (Clark et al. 2006, p. 16; Ivory
2006). The Links Flats population is the only occurrence on BLM lands
without any portion of the population protected as a WSA. Table 1
further illustrates the various protections in place on each of these
populations.
Except for grandfathered uses, the lands under wilderness review
must be managed so as not to impair their suitability for preservation
as wilderness (BLM 1976, p. 2). Grazing, a non-threat as discussed
above, is the only grandfathered use exempt from no surface occupancy
stipulations. No surface disturbance stipulations apply to
grandfathered mining and mineral extraction. While lands under
wilderness review may not be closed to future appropriation under the
mining laws, no surface occupancy stipulations apply in order to
preserve their wilderness character (BLM 1976, p. 2). Temporary uses
are permitted within WSAs as long as they create no new surface
disturbance and do not involve permanent placement of structures (BLM
1976, p. 2).
The BLM San Rafael Resource Management Plan was approved on May 24,
1991 (BLM 1991a). Erigeron maguirei is provided protection through land
use planning decisions, including the designation of ACECs (BLM 1991a).
Five of the six known populations of E. maguirei that occur on lands
administered by the BLM are within the San Rafael Canyon (middle
portion), Sid's Mountain, Highway I-70 Scenic Corridor, Muddy Creek,
and Seger's Hole ACECs (Clark et al. 2005, p. 16; Ivory 2006). Twenty-
five percent of Calf Canyon population's range occurs on BLM land, of
which 95 percent occurs within the San Rafael Canyon ACEC (middle
portion) (Clark et al. 2006, p. 16; Ivory 2006). One-hundred percent of
the Coal Wash population occurs within the Sid's Mountain ACEC (Clark
et al. 2006, p. 16; Ivory 2006). One-hundred percent of the portion of
the Secret Mesa population on BLM land occurs within the Sid's Mountain
ACEC or Highway I-70 Scenic Corridor ACEC (Clark et al. 2006, p. 16;
Ivory 2006). Ten percent of the John's Hole population's range occurs
within the Muddy Creek ACEC (Clark et al. 2006, p. 16; Ivory 2006).
Twenty percent of the Seger's Hole population's range occurs within the
Seger's Hole ACEC (Clark et al. 2006, p. 16; Ivory 2006). The Links
Flats population is the only occurrence on BLM lands without any
portion of the population protected as an ACEC. Table 1 further
illustrates the various protections in place for each population and
highlights where ACECs and WSAs overlap.
Special management conditions that apply to all WSAs and ACECs
include: Open to mineral entry with plans of operations; avoided for
right-of-way grants; excluded from private and commercial use of
woodland products, except for limited onsite collection of downed dead
wood for campfires; designated as closed to off-road vehicle use when
ACEC is within a WSA or WSA has been designated as primitive, otherwise
use is limited to designated roads and trails; and they are subject to
fire suppression with special conditions (BLM 1991a, pp. 14, 64-69, 81-
89).
The Highway I-70 Scenic Corridor, Muddy Creek, Seger's Hole, and
Sid's Mountain ACECs are open to mineral leasing, but no-surface-
occupancy stipulations must be attached to the lease. These areas are
also closed for disposal of mineral materials; open to range
improvements with special conditions; excluded from land treatments;
and are designated as Visual Resource Management Class I (described
above) (BLM 1991a, pp. 14, 64, 81-82). An exception to the no-surface-
occupancy stipulation may be granted in the Highway I-70 Scenic
Corridor ACEC if an environmental assessment concludes that the
proposed action would not adversely affect scenic values (BLM 1991a,
pp. 14, 81-82).
The San Rafael Canyon ACEC (middle portion) is open to mineral
leasing with surface restrictions; open for disposal of mineral
materials with special conditions; excluded from range improvements and
land treatments unless used to protect or improve riparian values; and
is designated as Visual Resource Management Class II (BLM 1991a, pp.
14, 64, 81-82). The objective of this class is to retain the existing
character of the landscape. The level of change to the characteristic
landscape should be low. Management activities may be seen, but should
not attract the attention of the casual observer. Any changes must
repeat the basic elements of form, line, color, and texture found in
the predominant natural features of the characteristic landscape.
The Highway I-70 Scenic Corridor, Muddy Creek, San Rafael Canyon
(Middle Portion), Seger's Hole, and Sid's Mountain ACECs are ma