Assistance Regulations, 28385-28391 [E8-11005]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
limited. This is because the amount of
live animals exported into the United
States from Panama is likely to remain
small. Trade statistics indicate that
since 2001, the United States has not
imported any ruminants, swine, or dogs
from Panama. Equine imports from
Panama over this period have numbered
only 163, which is approximately 0.06
percent of all horse imports.1
According to Small Business
Administration size standards for beef
cattle ranching and farming (North
American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) 112111), dairy cattle
and milk production (NAICS 112120),
hog and pig farming (NAICS 112210),
sheep farming (NAICS 112410), goat
farming (NAICS 112420), and horse and
other equine production (NAICS
112920), as well as the commercial
production of dogs, which is classified
under ‘‘all other animal production’’
(NAICS 112990),2 operations with not
more than $750,000 in annual sales are
considered small entities. We do not
expect that these producers, small or
otherwise, would be affected
significantly by the proposed change in
Panama’s screwworm status. This is
because, for the reasons discussed
above, live ruminants, swine, horses
and dogs from Panama do not play
much, if any, of a role in their
operations, and few susceptible live
animals are expected to be exported.
Under these circumstances, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service has
determined that this action would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. If this proposed rule is
adopted: (1) All State and local laws and
regulations that are inconsistent with
this rule will be preempted; (2) no
retroactive effect will be given to this
rule; and (3) administrative proceedings
will not be required before parties may
file suit in court challenging this rule.
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 93
Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock,
Poultry and poultry products,
Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 9
CFR part 93 as follows:
PART 93—IMPORTATION OF CERTAIN
ANIMALS, BIRDS, FISH, AND
POULTRY, AND CERTAIN ANIMAL,
BIRD, AND POULTRY PRODUCTS;
REQUIREMENTS FOR MEANS OF
CONVEYANCE AND SHIPPING
CONTAINERS
1. The authority citation for part 93
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622 and 8301–8317;
21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7
CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.
§ 93.301
[Amended]
2. In § 93.301, paragraph (j) is
amended by removing the word
‘‘Panama,’’.
§ 93.405
[Amended]
3. In § 93.405, paragraph (a)(3) is
amended by removing the word
‘‘Panama,’’.
§ 93.505
[Amended]
[Amended]
5. In § 93.600, paragraph (a) is
amended by removing the word
‘‘Panama,’’.
Done in Washington, DC, this 7th day of
May 2008.
Cindy J. Smith,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E8–10918 Filed 5–15–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Paperwork Reduction Act
10 CFR Parts 600 and 1024
This proposed rule contains no new
information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
RIN 1991–AB77
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
1 Based
on U.S. Census Bureau data, as presented
by Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA: https://
www.fas.usda.gov/ustrade/
USTImHS10.asp?QI=online_trade_dataTRad.
2 The ‘‘all other animal production’’ classification
also includes the production of other animals, such
as adornment birds (swans, peacocks, flamingos),
alpacas, birds for sale, buffalos, cats, crickets, deer,
elk, laboratory animals, llamas, rattlesnakes, worms,
and breeding of pets.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
Department of Energy.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy
(DOE) is proposing to amend its
Assistance Regulations to make changes
to streamline and simplify its
procedures for soliciting, awarding, and
administering its financial assistance
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Interested parties should submit
written comments on or before July 15,
2008.
ADDRESSES: This proposed rule is
available and comments may be
submitted online at https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments may
also be submitted electronically to
Jacqueline.kniskern@hq.doe.gov.
Comments may be mailed to: Jacqueline
Kniskern, Procurement Policy Analyst;
MA–61/Forrestal Building; U.S.
Department of Energy; 1000
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585. Electronic
submissions are encouraged to ensure
timely receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Jacqueline Kniskern, Office of
Procurement and Assistance Policy,
U.S. Department of Energy, at 202–287–
1342 or
Jacqueline.kniskern@hq.doe.gov.
DATES:
Sfmt 4702
I. Background
II. Explanation of Changes
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act of 1980
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995
D. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995
H. Review Under the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 1999
I. Review Under the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 2001
J. Review Under Executive Order 13211
K. Approval by the Office of the Secretary
of Energy
I. Background
Assistance Regulations
ACTION:
agreements. These changes are being
made to make technical corrections, to
revise sections affected by the Energy
Policy Act of 2005, and to further DOE’s
implementation of the Federal Financial
Assistance Management Improvement
Act of 1999. DOE is also proposing to
remove Part 1024, Procedures for
Financial Assistance Appeals, in its
entirety.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
4. In § 93.505, paragraph (b) is
amended by removing the word
‘‘Panama,’’.
§ 93.600
28385
DOE has been actively engaged in the
government-wide effort to streamline
and simplify the application,
administrative and reporting procedures
for Federal financial assistance
programs pursuant to the Federal
Financial Assistance Management
Improvement Act of 1999, Public Law
No. 106–107.
As part of this initiative, DOE has
solicited comments and suggestions
from the grant community and made
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
28386
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
changes to its assistance regulations. In
particular, the DOE added to 10 CFR
Part 600 Subpart D, Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements with For-Profit
Organizations, in a rule published in the
Federal Register (68 FR 50645, August
21, 2003).
DOE has also incorporated policy
directives issued by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) that
established a standard format for
Federal agency announcements of
funding opportunities under programs
that award discretionary grants or
cooperative agreements, established
standard data elements for
electronically posting synopses of
Federal agencies’ announcements of
funding opportunities, and required
Federal agencies to post synopses of
their discretionary grant and
cooperative agreement funding
opportunity announcements on the
Grants.gov Web site, https://
www.Grants.gov. The final rule
incorporating these policy directives
was published in the Federal Register at
69 FR 7865 on February 20, 2004. In
addition, DOE developed a standard
format for its funding opportunity
announcements and revised systems to
comply with the new posting
requirements.
Today, DOE is proposing to update,
streamline and simplify the general
rules in Subpart A of its Financial
Assistance Rules. DOE is proposing to
eliminate sections that are duplicative
of other sections that incorporated OMB
Circulars and provide no additional
guidance or information to applicants
and recipients or require applicants to
look at multiple sections for the same
information. In addition, DOE is
proposing to eliminate sections
containing outdated requirements,
which can be confusing to applicants
and recipients.
Section 988 of the Energy Policy Act
of 2005, Public Law No. 109–58,
established Department-wide cost
sharing requirements for most research,
development, demonstration, and
commercial application activities
initiated after the date of enactment.
The requirements of section 988 take the
place of the numerous, current cost
sharing requirements that have been
contained in previous authorization and
appropriations laws. This proposed rule
will implement the requirements of
section 988 replacing those promulgated
after the Energy Policy Act of 1992,
Public Law No. 102–486.
DOE is making technical corrections
to provide consistency and clarity
throughout the Financial Assistance
Rules as put in practice and to provide
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
references to sections in Subpart D that
were not incorporated with that rule, 68
FR 50645 (August 21, 2003).
Lastly, the DOE Financial Assistance
Appeals Board was abolished when
DOE’s Energy Board of Contract Appeals
was merged into the Civilian Board of
Contract Appeals as required by section
847 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006,
Public Law No. 109–163. While DOE
has maintained appeal rights by
providing for appeals to the DOE Senior
Procurement Executive (SPE) (see
section 29 of this notice for changes in
10 CFR 600.22), the regulatory
procedures designed for the Financial
Assistance Appeals Board are not
necessary for those appeals. Internal
agency procedures will be used instead.
II. Section-by-Section Analysis
DOE is proposing to amend 10 CFR
Parts 600 and 1024 as follows.
1. Section 600.2 is amended by
changing ‘‘solicitation’’ to ‘‘funding
opportunity announcement’’ in
paragraph (a) to be consistent with
section 600.
2. Section 600.3 is amended by
capitalizing ‘‘Contracting Officer’’ in the
definition of ‘‘Amendment’’; by adding
definitions for ‘‘Cost sharing or
matching’’ and ‘‘Total project cost’’ to
facilitate changes made in section
600.30, ‘‘Cost Sharing.’’
3. Section 600.4 is amended to add a
reference to section 600.304 in
paragraph (a) that was not incorporated
at the time Subpart D was added to Part
600.
4. Section 600.6 is amended in
paragraphs (b), (b)(1), and (c)(7) by
changing ‘‘solicitation’’ to ‘‘funding
opportunity announcement’’ to be
consistent with section 600.8.
Paragraphs (b) and (d) are amended to
restate the concurrence and approval
requirements in plain English. This
revision is not intended to alter
substantially the concurrence and
approval requirements.
5. Section 600.8 has been renamed
‘‘Funding Opportunity Announcement’’
to more accurately reflect the coverage
of this section. Paragraphs (a), (a)(1),
and (a)(2) are amended by deleting
‘‘solicitation’’ and ‘‘program
announcement’’ and replacing with
‘‘funding opportunity announcement’’
or its acronym ‘‘FOA.’’
6. Section 600.10 is amended to add
the requirement for all applicants to be
registered in the Central Contractor
Registration and to make changes
related to the receipt of applications
electronically.
7. Section 600.11 is deleted in its
entirety as this information more
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
accurately belongs in a funding
opportunity announcement when
applicable.
8. Section 600.12 is deleted in its
entirety as the requirements of
assurances and certifications have been
incorporated Government-wide in the
standard application forms maintained
by Grants.gov.
9. Section 600.14 is marked as
reserved for consistency and clarity
with the rest of Part 600.
10. Section 600.15 is amended by
changing ‘‘solicitation’’ to ‘‘funding
opportunity announcement’’ in
paragraph (b)(2) for clarity and
consistency with the rest of Part 600.
11. Section 600.16 is amended by
inserting a new paragraph (b) that
describes a recipient’s acceptance of an
award and redesignating the old
paragraph (b) as paragraph (c).
12. Section 600.17 is amended to
facilitate changes to administration
requirements.
13. Section 600.18 is deleted in its
entirety. The recipient’s responsibility
for acceptance of an award has been
moved to section 600.16.
14. Section 600.19 is amended by
deleting, in the second sentence, the
word ‘‘briefly’’ and the phrase ‘‘and, if
for grounds other than unavailability of
funds, shall offer the unsuccessful
applicant the opportunity for a more
detailed explanation upon request’’ as
the applicant may always request
additional information no matter the
reason for the unsuccessful application.
15. Section 600.21 is amended by
adding a cross reference to the
applicable section of Subpart D in
paragraph (a) that was not incorporated
at the time Subpart D was added to Part
600.
16. Section 600.22 is amended to
update the section for changes to the
Financial Assistance Appeals Board.
The Financial Assistance Appeals Board
was staffed by the Energy Board of
Contract Appeals which was abolished
by Section 847 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006,
Public Law No. 109–163. The
Department is maintaining the right of
recipients to appeal certain Contracting
Officer’s determinations by providing
for appeals to the DOE or National
Nuclear Security Administration
(NNSA) Senior Procurement Executive
(SPE) in place of the now defunct
appeals board. Specifically, the
reference to 10 CFR 1024 in paragraph
(a) is deleted as this Part is being
removed by this proposed rulemaking;
paragraph (d) is updated with the
correct contact information for the two
SPEs; paragraphs (e) and (f) are updated
by changing the reference to the Board
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
to SPEs. Paragraph (f) is also updated to
include references to the applicable
sections of Subpart D of this part that
were not added at the time Subpart D
was implemented.
17. Section 600.23 is deleted in its
entirety as this information has recently
been moved to Title 2 of the CFR as part
of the implementation of the OMB
guidance provided at 2 CFR Part 180
and as part of OMB’s initiative to
streamline and consolidate all federal
regulations on nonprocurement
debarment and suspension.
18. Section 600.24 is amended by
adding references to Subpart D of 10
CFR part 600 in addition to Subparts B
and C that were not updated as part of
the rulemaking that added Subpart D in
2003.
19. Section 600.25 is amended by
adding references to Subpart D of 10
CFR Part 600 in addition to Subparts B
and C that were not updated as part of
the rulemaking that added Subpart D in
2003 and to delete certain references to
Subparts B, C and D that do not require
written notification as previously
indicated in Section 600.25.
20. Section 600.26 is deleted in its
entirety as it is duplicative of sections
in other areas of Part 600.
21. Section 600.28 is deleted in its
entirety as it is duplicative of sections
in other areas of Part 600 and 10 CFR
Part 601.
22. Section 600.29 is amended to raise
the dollar threshold to provide greater
flexibility to Contracting Officers and
recipients in award and administration
of financial assistance agreements.
23. Section 600.30 is amended to
incorporate the requirements of section
988 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005,
Public Law No. 109–58, which
standardized cost sharing requirements
for research and development activities.
24. Section 600.31 is amended by
capitalizing all references to Contracting
Officer for consistency purposes.
25. Section 600.112 is amended by
changing ‘‘solicitation’’ to ‘‘funding
opportunity announcement’’ to be
consistent with 600.8; deleting
paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2) and (b)(1) in
order to delete requirements to use
specific DOE forms as DOE is using the
forms maintained by Grants.gov for
applying for financial assistance as part
of an overall government-wide policy;
and renumbering paragraphs (b)(2) and
(c) as paragraphs (c) and (d).
26. Section 600.113 is amended to
correct the citation for ‘‘Debarment and
Suspension’’ to 2 CFR Parts 180 and
901.
27. Section 600.117 is deleted in its
entirety as representations, certifications
and assurances are now received
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
28387
through the submission of standard
application forms with governmentwide changes due to the
implementation of Grants.gov.
28. Section 600.305 is amended to
correct the citation for Debarment and
Suspension to 2 CFR Parts 180 and 901.
29. DOE is proposing to remove Part
1024 in its entirety as the Financial
Assistance Appeals Board, staffed by the
Energy Board of Contract Appeals, was
abolished by the Department to comply
with section 847 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006,
Public Law No. 109–163. The
Department is maintaining the right of
recipients to appeal Contracting
Officer’s determinations by providing
for appeals to the DOE or NNSA Senior
Procurement Executive (SPE) in place of
the now defunct appeals board. See 10
CFR Part 600.22 as amended by this
proposed rulemaking.
burdensome requirements that enable
firms from the commercial marketplace
to participate in DOE research,
development, and demonstration
projects. Today’s proposed amendments
would not alter the substance of the
OMB requirements or impose significant
additional burdens. On the basis of the
foregoing, DOE certifies that the rule
does not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. DOE did not prepare a
regulatory flexibility analysis for this
rulemaking.
III. Procedural Requirements
D. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
This regulatory action has been
determined not to be ‘‘a significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, 58 FR 51735 (October 4, 1993).
Accordingly, this action is not subject to
review under that Executive Order by
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) of OMB.
B. Review Under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires preparation
of an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis for any rule that by law must
be proposed for public comment, unless
the agency certifies that the rule, if
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. As required by
Executive Order 13272, Proper
Consideration of Small Entities in
Agency Rulemaking, 67 FR 53461
(August 16, 2002), DOE published
procedures and policies to ensure that
the potential impacts of its draft rules
on small entities are properly
considered during the rulemaking
process, 68 FR 7990 (February 19, 2003),
and has made them available on the
Office of General Counsel’s Web site:
https://www.gc.doe.gov. DOE has
reviewed today’s rule under the
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act and the procedures and policies
published on February 19, 2003.
Today’s proposed rule would subject
small entities either to requirements that
parallel government-wide requirements
that OMB Circular A–110 establishes for
other assistance awards, or to less
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
C. Review Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995
This regulatory action will not impose
any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements subject to
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
DOE has concluded that promulgation
of this rule falls into a class of actions
that would not individually or
cumulatively have a significant impact
on the human environment, as
determined by DOE’s regulations
implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). Specifically, this
rule establishes guidelines and
procedures for application and review,
administration, audit and closeout of
assistance instruments, and, therefore, is
covered under the Categorical Exclusion
in paragraph A6 of Appendix A to
Subpart D, 10 CFR Part 1021.
Accordingly, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental
impact statement is required.
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, 64 FR 43255
(August 4, 1999), imposes certain
requirements on agencies formulating
and implementing policies or
regulations that preempt state law or
that have federalism implications.
Agencies are required to examine the
constitutional and statutory authority
supporting any action that would limit
the policymaking discretion of the states
and carefully assess the necessity for
such actions. DOE has examined today’s
proposed rule and has determined that
it does not preempt state law and does
not have a substantial direct effect on
the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. No further action
is required by Executive Order 13132.
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
28388
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing
regulations and the promulgation of
new regulations, section 3(a) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, 61 FR 4729 (February 7, 1996),
imposes on executive agencies the
general duty to adhere to the following
requirements: (1) Eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity; (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation; (3)
provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct rather than a general
standard; and (4) promote simplification
and burden reduction. Section 3(b) of
Executive Order 12988 specifically
requires that executive agencies make
every reasonable effort to ensure that the
regulation: (1) Clearly specifies the
preemptive effect, if any; (2) clearly
specifies any effect on existing federal
law or regulation; (3) provides a clear
legal standard for affected conduct
while promoting simplification and
burden reduction; (4) specifies the
retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately
defines key terms; and (6) addresses
other important issues affecting clarity
and general draftsmanship under any
guidelines issued by the United States
Attorney General. Section 3(c) of
Executive Order 12988 requires
executive agencies to review regulations
in light of applicable standards in
sections 3(a) and 3(b) to determine
whether they are met or if it is
unreasonable to meet one or more of
them. DOE has completed the required
review and determined that, to the
extent permitted by law, this rule meets
the relevant standards of Executive
Order 12988.
G. Review Under the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995, Public Law No. 104–4,
generally requires federal agencies to
examine closely the impacts of
regulatory actions on state, local, or
tribal governments. Subsection 101(5) of
Title I of that law defines a federal
intergovernmental mandate to include a
regulation that would impose upon
state, local, or tribal governments an
enforceable duty, except a condition of
federal assistance or a duty arising from
participating in a voluntary federal
program. Title II of that law requires
each Federal agency to assess the effects
of Federal regulatory actions on state,
local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or the private sector, other
than to the extent such actions merely
incorporate requirements specifically
set forth in a statute. Section 202 of the
title requires a federal agency to perform
a detailed assessment of the anticipated
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
costs and benefits of any rule that
includes a Federal mandate which may
result in costs to state, local, or tribal
governments, or the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any one year
(adjusted annually for inflation). 2
U.S.C. 1532(a) and (b). Section 204 of
that title requires each agency that
proposed a rule containing a significant
federal intergovernmental mandate to
develop an effective process for
obtaining meaningful and timely input
from elected officers of state, local, and
tribal governments. 2 U.S.C. 1534.
This proposed rule would amend the
assistance regulations with changes that
streamline and simplify procedures for
soliciting, awarding, and administering
financial assistance agreements. The
proposed rule would not result in the
expenditure by state, local, and tribal
governments, in aggregate, or by the
private sector of $100 million or more
in any one year. Accordingly, no
assessment or analysis is required under
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
H. Review Under the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999, Public Law No. 105–277,
requires federal agencies to issue a
Family Policymaking Assessment for
any proposed rule or policy that may
affect family well-being. This rule will
not have any impact on the autonomy
or integrity of the family as an
institution. Accordingly, DOE has
concluded that it is not necessary to
prepare a Family Policymaking
Assessment.
I. Review Under the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001
The Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 2001,
44 U.S.C. 3516 note, provides for
agencies to review most disseminations
of information to the public under
implementing guidelines established by
each agency pursuant to general
guidelines issued by OMB. OMB’s
guidelines were published at 67 FR
8452 (February 22, 2002), and DOE’s
guidelines were published at 67 FR
62446 (October 7, 2002). DOE has
reviewed today’s rule under the OMB
and DOE guidelines and has concluded
that it is consistent with applicable
policies in those guidelines.
J. Review Under Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Distribution, or Use, 66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001), requires federal agencies to
prepare and submit to the OMB a
Statement of Energy Effects for any
proposed significant energy action. A
‘‘significant energy action’’ is defined as
any action by an agency that
promulgated or is expected to lead to
promulgation of a final rule, and that:
(1) Is a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866, or any
successor order; and (2) is likely to have
a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy; or
(3) is designated by the Administrator of
OIRA as a significant energy action. For
any proposed significant energy action,
the agency must give a detailed
statement of any adverse effects on
energy supply, distribution, or use
should the proposal be implemented,
and of reasonable alternatives to the
action and their expected benefits on
energy supply, distribution, and use.
This regulatory action would not have
a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy
and is therefore not a significant energy
action. Accordingly, DOE has not
prepared a Statement of Energy Effects.
K. Approval by the Office of the
Secretary of Energy
The Office of the Secretary has
approved the issuance of this proposed
rule.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Parts 600 and
1024
Administrative practice and
procedure, Assistance programs.
Edward R. Simpson,
Director, Office of Procurement and
Assistance Management, Office of
Management, Department of Energy
David O. Boyd,
Director, Office of Acquisition and Supply
Management, National Nuclear Security
Administration.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, Part 600 of Chapter II, and
Part 1024 of Chapter X, Title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations are
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 600—FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
RULES
1. The authority citation for part 600
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.; 31 U.S.C.
6301–6308; 50 U.S.C. 2401 et seq., unless
otherwise noted.
§ 600.2
[Amended]
2. Section 600.2 is amended in
paragraph (a) by removing
‘‘solicitations’’ and adding ‘‘funding
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
28389
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
opportunity announcements’’ in its
place.
3. Section 600.3 is amended in the
definition of ‘‘Amendment’’ by
capitalizing ‘‘Contracting Officer’’, and
by adding new definitions in
alphabetical order for ‘‘Cost sharing or
matching’’ and ‘‘Total Project Cost’’ to
read as follows:
§ 600.3
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Cost sharing or matching means that
portion of project or program costs not
borne by the Federal Government.
*
*
*
*
*
Total Project Cost means all allowable
costs, as set forth in the applicable
federal cost principles, incurred in
accomplishing the objective of the
project during the project period,
including the value of contributions
made by third parties and costs incurred
by Federally Funded Research and
Development Centers.
4. Section 600.4 paragraph (a)(1) is
amended by revising the second
sentence to read as follows:
§ 600.4
Deviations.
(a) General. (1) * * * The use of
optional or discretionary provisions of
this part, including special restrictive
conditions used in accordance with
§§ 600.114, 600.212, and 600.304 are not
deviations. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
5. Section 600.6 is revised to read as
follows:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 600.6
Eligibility.
(a) General. DOE shall solicit
applications for financial assistance in a
manner which provides for the
maximum amount of competition
feasible.
(b) Restricted eligibility. If DOE
restricts eligibility, an explanation of
why the restriction of eligibility is
considered necessary shall be included
in the funding opportunity
announcement, program rule, or
published notice.
(1) If the aggregate amount of DOE
funds available for award under a
funding opportunity announcement or
published notice is $1 million or more,
unless authorized by statute or program
rule, such restriction of eligibility shall
be:
(i) Supported by a written
determination initiated by the program
office;
(ii) Concurred in by legal counsel and
the Contracting Officer; and
(iii) Approved by an official no less
than one level below the responsible
program Assistant Secretary, Deputy
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
Administrator, or other official of
equivalent authority.
(2) Where the amount of DOE funds
is less than $1 million, the cognizant
Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) and
the Contracting Officer may approve the
determination.
(c) Noncompetitive financial
assistance. DOE may award a grant or
cooperative agreement on a
noncompetitive basis only if the
application satisfies one or more of the
following selection criteria:
(1) The activity to be funded is
necessary to the satisfactory completion
of, or is a continuation or renewal of, an
activity presently being funded by DOE
or another Federal agency, and for
which competition for support would
have a significant adverse effect on
continuity or completion of the activity.
(2) The activity is being or would be
conducted by the applicant using its
own resources or those donated or
provided by third parties; however, DOE
support of that activity would enhance
the public benefits to be derived and
DOE knows of no other entity which is
conducting or is planning to conduct
such an activity.
(3) The applicant is a unit of
government and the activity to be
supported is related to the performance
of a governmental function within the
subject jurisdiction, thereby precluding
DOE provision of support to another
entity.
(4) The applicant has exclusive
domestic capability to perform the
activity successfully, based upon unique
equipment, proprietary data, technical
expertise, or other such unique
qualifications.
(5) The award implements an
agreement between the United States
Government and a foreign government
to fund a foreign applicant.
(6) Time constraints associated with a
public health, safety, welfare or national
security requirement preclude
competition.
(7) The proposed project was
submitted as an unsolicited proposal
and represents a unique or innovative
idea, method, or approach which would
not be eligible for financial assistance
under a recent, current, or planned
funding opportunity announcement,
and if, as determined by DOE, a
competitive funding opportunity
announcement would not be
appropriate.
(8) The responsible program Assistant
Secretary, Deputy Administrator, or
other official of equivalent authority
determines that a noncompetitive award
is in the public interest. This authority
may not be delegated.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(d) Approval requirements. (1) Where
the amount of DOE funds is $1 million
or greater, determinations of
noncompetitive awards shall be:
(i) Documented in writing;
(ii) Concurred in by the responsible
program technical official and local
legal counsel; and
(iii) Approved, prior to award, by the
responsible program Assistant
Secretary, Deputy Administrator, or
official of equivalent authority and the
Contracting Officer. The approval
authority may be delegated to one
organizational level below the Assistant
Secretary, Deputy Administrator, or
official of equivalent authority.
(2) Where the amount of DOE funds
is less than $1 million, determinations
of noncompetitive awards shall be:
(i) Documented in writing;
(ii) Concurred in by local legal
counsel, unless for a particular award or
class of awards of $1 million or less,
review is waived by legal counsel; and
(iii) Approved by the cognizant HCA
and the Contracting Officer.
§ 600.8 Funding opportunity
announcement.
6. Section 600.8 is amended as
follows:
a. The section heading is revised as
set forth above.
b. In paragraph (a) introductory text,
the first sentence is amended by
removing ‘‘Program announcement’’ and
adding ‘‘Funding Opportunity
Announcements (FOA)’’ in its place.
c. In paragraph (a)(1), the last
sentence is amended by removing
‘‘Solicitations’’ and adding ‘‘FOAs’’ in
its place.
d. In paragraph (a)(2) introductory
text, the first sentence is amended by
removing ‘‘Program announcements’’
and adding ‘‘FOAs’’ in its place.
7. Section 600.10 is amended as
follows:
a. In paragraph (b), the first sentence
is amended by removing ‘‘and in the
number of copies’’
b. In paragraph (c)(1), the second
sentence is amended by removing ‘‘or
other approved DOE application form’’
c. Paragraph (c)(4) is removed.
d. A new paragraph (f) is added to
read as follows:
§ 600.10
Form and content of application.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Registration is required in the
Central Contractor Registration (CCR)
for all applications. Information on
registration can be obtained at https://
www.ccr.gov/Grantees.aspx.
§§ 600.11 and 600.12
[Removed]
8. Sections 600.11 and 600.12 are
removed and reserved.
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
28390
§ 600.14
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
[Reserved]
§ 600.22
9. Section 600.14 is added and
reserved.
Disputes and appeals.
14. Section 600.19 is amended by
removing, in the second sentence,
‘‘briefly’’ and ‘‘and, if for grounds other
than unavailability of funds, shall offer
the unsuccessful applicant the
opportunity for a more detailed
explanation upon request’’.
*
*
*
*
(d) Right of appeal. Except as
provided in paragraph (f)(1) of this
section, the final determination under
paragraph (c) of this section may be
appealed to the cognizant SPE for either
DOE or the National Nuclear Security
Administration (NNSA). The mailing
address for the DOE SPE is Office of
Procurement and Assistance
Management, 1000 Independence Ave.,
SW., Washington, DC 20585. The
mailing address for the NNSA SPE is
Office of Acquisition and Supply
Management, 1000 Independence Ave.,
SW., Washington, DC 20585.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Review on appeal. (1) The SPE
shall have no jurisdiction to review
(i) Any preaward dispute (except as
provided in paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this
section), including use of any special
restrictive condition pursuant to
§§ 600.114, 600.212, or 600.304;
(ii) DOE denial of a request for a
deviation under §§ 600.4, 600.103,
600.205, or 600.303 of this part;
(iii) DOE denial of a request for a
budget revision or other change in the
approved project under §§ 600.125,
600.127, 600.222, 600.230, 600.315, or
600.317 of this part or under another
term or condition of the award;
(iv) Any DOE action authorized under
§§ 600.162(a)(1), (2), (3) or (5);
600.243(a)(1), (a)(3), or §§ 600.352(a)(1),
(2), (3) or (5) for suspensions only; or
§§ 600.162(a)(4), 600.243(a)(4) or
600.352(a)(4) for actions disapproving
renewal applications or other requests
for extension of time or additional
funding for the same project when
related to recipient noncompliance, or
such actions authorized by program
rule;
(v) Any DOE decision about an action
requiring prior DOE approval under
§§ 600.144, 600.236, or 600.331 of this
part or under another term or condition
of the award; * * *
§ 600.21
§ 600.23
§ 600.15
*
[Amended]
10. Section 600.15, paragraph (b)(2) is
amended by removing ‘‘solicitation’’
and adding ‘‘funding opportunity
announcement’’ in its place.
11. Section 600.16, is amended by
redesignating paragraph (b) as paragraph
(c), and by adding a new paragraph (b)
to read as follows:
§ 600.16
award.
Legal authority and effect of an
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Recipients are free to accept or
reject the award. A request to drawdown
DOE funds constitutes acceptance;
however DOE may require formal
acceptance of an award.
*
*
*
*
*
12. Section 600.17 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 600.17
Contents of Award.
Each financial assistance award shall
be made on a cover agreement page,
which contains basic identifying and
funding information. The award will
identify special terms and conditions,
program regulations, the National Policy
Assurances, and any other provisions
necessary to establish the respective
right, duties, obligations, and
responsibilities of DOE and the
recipient, consistent with the
requirements of this part.
§ 600.18
[Removed]
13. Section 600.18 is removed and
reserved.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 600.19
[Amended]
[Amended]
15. Section 600.21, paragraph (a) is
amended by removing ‘‘§§ 600.153 and
600.242’’ and adding ‘‘§§ 600.153,
600.242 and 600.342’’ in its place.
16. Section 600.22 is amended as
follows:
a. In the last sentence of paragraph (a),
the words ‘‘available in 10 CFR Part
1024’’ are removed.
b. Paragraphs (d) and (f)(1) are
revised.
c. Paragraphs (e), (f)(2), (f)(3) and (f)(4)
are amended by removing ‘‘Board’’ and
adding ‘‘ SPE’’ in its place, for every
occurrence.
The revisions read as follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
[Removed]
17. Section 600.23 is removed and
reserved.
§ 600.24
[Amended]
18. Section 600.24 is amended in
paragraphs (a)(3) and (b) introductory
text by removing ‘‘or § 600.243(a)’’ and
adding ‘‘§§ 600.243(a), 600.312(g) or
600.352(a)’’ in its place.
19. Section 600.25 is amended in:
a. Paragraph (a)(1) by removing ‘‘or
§ 600.243(a)’’ and adding ‘‘§ 600.243(a)
or 600.352(a)’’ in its place.
b. Paragraph (a)(2) by removing
‘‘§ 600.23’’ and adding ‘‘2 CFR Part 180
and 901’’ in its place.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
c. Paragraph (b) is revised.
d. Paragraph (d) by removing ‘‘or
§§ 600.243 through 600.244’’ and adding
‘‘§§ 600.243 through 600.244 or
§§ 600.350 through 600.353’’ in its
place.
e. Paragraph (f) by removing ‘‘or
§§ 600.243 through 600.244’’ and adding
‘‘§§ 600.243 through 600.244 or
§§ 600.350 through 600.353’’ in its
place.
The revision reads as follows:
§ 600.25
Suspension and termination.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Notification requirements. Except
as provided in §§ 600.24, 600.162(a) ,
600.243(a) or 600.352(a) before
suspending or terminating an award for
cause, DOE shall mail to the awardee
(by certified mail, return receipt
requested) a separate written notice in
addition to that required by § 600.24(a)
at least ten days prior to the effective
date of the suspension or termination.
Such notice shall include, as
appropriate:
(1) The factual and legal basis for the
suspension or termination;
(2) The effective date or dates of the
DOE action;
(3) If the action does not apply to the
entire award, a description of the
activities affected by the action;
(4) Instructions concerning which
costs shall be allowable during the
period of suspension, or instructions
concerning allowable termination costs,
including in either case, instructions
concerning any subgrants or contracts;
(5) Instructions concerning required
final reports and other closeout actions
for terminated awards (see §§ 600.170
through 600.173, §§ 600.250 through
600.252 and §§ 600.350 through
600.353);
(6) A statement of the awardees’ right
to appeal a termination for cause
pursuant to section 600.22; and
(7) The dated signature of a DOE
Contracting Officer.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 600.26
[Removed]
20. Section 600.26 is removed and
reserved.
§ 600.28
[Removed]
21. Section 600.28 is removed and
reserved.
§ 600.29
[Amended]
22. Section 600.29 is amended as
follows:
a. Paragraph (b)(1), ‘‘$100,000’’ is
removed and ‘‘$250,000’’ is added in its
place.
b. In paragraphs (b)(5) and (b)(6)
‘‘Contracting Officer’’ is capitalized.
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Proposed Rules
23. Section 600.30 is revised to read
as follows:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 600.30
Cost sharing.
In addition to the requirements of
§§ 600.123, 600.224, or 600.313, the
following requirements apply to
research, development, demonstration
and commercial application activities
projects:
(a) Cost sharing is required for most
financial assistance awards for research,
development, demonstration and
commercial applications activities
initiated after the enactment of the
Energy Policy Act of 2005 on August 8,
2005. This requirement does not apply
to:
(1) An award under the small
business innovation research program or
the small business technology transfer
program; or
(2) A program with cost sharing
requirements defined by other than
Section 988 of the Energy Policy Act of
2005 including other sections of the
2005 Act and the Energy Policy Act of
1992.
(b) A cost share of at least 20 percent
of the cost of the activity is required for
research and development except
where:
(1) A research or development activity
of a basic or fundamental nature has
been excluded by an appropriate officer
of the Department, generally an Under
Secretary; or
(2) The Secretary or delegatee has
determined it is necessary and
appropriate to reduce or eliminate the
cost sharing requirement for a research
and development activity of an applied
nature.
(c) A cost share of at least 50 percent
of the cost of a demonstration or
commercial application program or
activity is required unless the Secretary
or delegatee has determined that it is
necessary and appropriate to reduce the
cost sharing requirements, taking into
consideration any technological risk
relating to the activity.
(d) Cost share shall be provided by
non-Federal funds unless otherwise
authorized by statute. In calculating the
amount of the non-Federal contribution:
(1) Base the non-Federal contribution
on total project costs, including the cost
of work where funds are provided
directly to a partner, consortium
member or subrecipient, such as a
Federally Funded Research and
Development Center;
(2) Include the following costs as
allowable in accordance with the
applicable cost principles:
(i) Cash;
(ii) Personnel costs;
(iii) The value of a service, other
resource, or third party in-kind
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
contribution determined in accordance
with the applicable Circular of the
Office of Management and Budget;
(iv) Indirect costs or facilities and
administrative costs; and/or
(v) Any funds received under the
power program of the Tennessee Valley
Authority (except to the extent that such
funds are made available under an
annual appropriation Act);
(3) Exclude the following costs:
(i) Revenues or royalties from the
prospective operation of an activity
beyond the time considered in the
award;
(ii) Proceeds from the prospective sale
of an asset of an activity; or
(iii) Other appropriated Federal funds.
(iv) Repayment of the Federal share of
a cost-shared activity under Section 988
of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 shall
not be a condition of the award.
§ 600.31
[Amended]
24. Section 600.31 is amended as
follows:
a. In paragraph (c), Contracting Officer
is capitalized in all occurrences.
b. In paragraph (d) introductory text,
Contracting Officer is capitalized.
c. In paragraph (f)(5), Contracting
Officer is capitalized.
25. Section 600.112 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 600.112 Forms for applying for Federal
assistance.
(a) An application for an award shall
be on the form or in the format specified
in a program rule or in the funding
opportunity announcement. When a
version of the Standard Form 424 is not
used, DOE shall indicate whether the
application is subject to review by the
State under Executive Order 12372.
(b) DOE may request and the
applicant shall submit the minimum
budgetary information necessary to
evaluate the costs of the proposed
project.
(c) DOE may, subsequent to receipt of
an application, request additional
information from an applicant when
necessary for clarification or to make
informed preaward determinations.
(d) DOE may require that an
application for a continuation or
renewal award be made in the format or
on the forms authorized by paragraphs
(a) and (b) of this section.
§ 600.113
[Amended]
26. Section 600.113 is amended by
removing ‘‘10 CFR 1036’’ and adding ‘‘2
CFR 180 and 901’’ in its place.
§ 600.117
[Removed]
27. Section 600.117 is removed and
reserved.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 600.305
28391
[Amended]
28. Section 600.305 is amended by
removing ‘‘10 CFR 1036’’ and adding ‘‘2
CFR 180 and 901’’ in its place.
29. Under the authority of the
Department of Energy Organization Act,
Public Law 95–91, 91 Stat. 577 (42
U.S.C. 7101, et seq.); E.O. 10789; Public
Law 95–224, 92 Stat. 3 (41 U.S.C. 501–
509), part 1024 is removed.
PART 1024—[REMOVED]
[FR Doc. E8–11005 Filed 5–15–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2007–1125; FRL–8363–6]
Pesticide Inert Ingredient; Proposal to
Revoke the Obsolete Tolerance
Exemption for Sperm Oil
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to revoke
the existing obsolete tolerance
exemption under 40 CFR 180.910 for
residues of sperm oil conforming to 21
CFR 172.210 as part of a broader
administrative effort to correct errors
and clarify permitted uses of pesticide
inert ingredients in the Code of Federal
Regulations. There have not been any
active Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,
and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) pesticide
product registrations containing this
substance for many years. In addition,
the sperm whale (from which sperm oil
is derived) is a federally listed
endangered species, and taking (or
harming) this species is prohibited
under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Therefore, since this exemption
corresponds to uses no longer current or
registered under FIFRA in the United
States, EPA is proposing to revoke the
existing tolerance exemption under 40
CFR 180.910 because it is no longer
necessary.
Comments must be received on
or before June 16, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2007–1125, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 96 (Friday, May 16, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28385-28391]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-11005]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Parts 600 and 1024
RIN 1991-AB77
Assistance Regulations
AGENCY: Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) is proposing to amend its
Assistance Regulations to make changes to streamline and simplify its
procedures for soliciting, awarding, and administering its financial
assistance agreements. These changes are being made to make technical
corrections, to revise sections affected by the Energy Policy Act of
2005, and to further DOE's implementation of the Federal Financial
Assistance Management Improvement Act of 1999. DOE is also proposing to
remove Part 1024, Procedures for Financial Assistance Appeals, in its
entirety.
DATES: Interested parties should submit written comments on or before
July 15, 2008.
ADDRESSES: This proposed rule is available and comments may be
submitted online at https://www.regulations.gov. Comments may also be
submitted electronically to Jacqueline.kniskern@hq.doe.gov. Comments
may be mailed to: Jacqueline Kniskern, Procurement Policy Analyst; MA-
61/Forrestal Building; U.S. Department of Energy; 1000 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585. Electronic submissions are
encouraged to ensure timely receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jacqueline Kniskern, Office of
Procurement and Assistance Policy, U.S. Department of Energy, at 202-
287-1342 or Jacqueline.kniskern@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Explanation of Changes
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999
I. Review Under the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 2001
J. Review Under Executive Order 13211
K. Approval by the Office of the Secretary of Energy
I. Background
DOE has been actively engaged in the government-wide effort to
streamline and simplify the application, administrative and reporting
procedures for Federal financial assistance programs pursuant to the
Federal Financial Assistance Management Improvement Act of 1999, Public
Law No. 106-107.
As part of this initiative, DOE has solicited comments and
suggestions from the grant community and made
[[Page 28386]]
changes to its assistance regulations. In particular, the DOE added to
10 CFR Part 600 Subpart D, Administrative Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements with For-Profit Organizations, in a rule
published in the Federal Register (68 FR 50645, August 21, 2003).
DOE has also incorporated policy directives issued by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) that established a standard format for
Federal agency announcements of funding opportunities under programs
that award discretionary grants or cooperative agreements, established
standard data elements for electronically posting synopses of Federal
agencies' announcements of funding opportunities, and required Federal
agencies to post synopses of their discretionary grant and cooperative
agreement funding opportunity announcements on the Grants.gov Web site,
https://www.Grants.gov. The final rule incorporating these policy
directives was published in the Federal Register at 69 FR 7865 on
February 20, 2004. In addition, DOE developed a standard format for its
funding opportunity announcements and revised systems to comply with
the new posting requirements.
Today, DOE is proposing to update, streamline and simplify the
general rules in Subpart A of its Financial Assistance Rules. DOE is
proposing to eliminate sections that are duplicative of other sections
that incorporated OMB Circulars and provide no additional guidance or
information to applicants and recipients or require applicants to look
at multiple sections for the same information. In addition, DOE is
proposing to eliminate sections containing outdated requirements, which
can be confusing to applicants and recipients.
Section 988 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Public Law No. 109-
58, established Department-wide cost sharing requirements for most
research, development, demonstration, and commercial application
activities initiated after the date of enactment. The requirements of
section 988 take the place of the numerous, current cost sharing
requirements that have been contained in previous authorization and
appropriations laws. This proposed rule will implement the requirements
of section 988 replacing those promulgated after the Energy Policy Act
of 1992, Public Law No. 102-486.
DOE is making technical corrections to provide consistency and
clarity throughout the Financial Assistance Rules as put in practice
and to provide references to sections in Subpart D that were not
incorporated with that rule, 68 FR 50645 (August 21, 2003).
Lastly, the DOE Financial Assistance Appeals Board was abolished
when DOE's Energy Board of Contract Appeals was merged into the
Civilian Board of Contract Appeals as required by section 847 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, Public Law No.
109-163. While DOE has maintained appeal rights by providing for
appeals to the DOE Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) (see section 29
of this notice for changes in 10 CFR 600.22), the regulatory procedures
designed for the Financial Assistance Appeals Board are not necessary
for those appeals. Internal agency procedures will be used instead.
II. Section-by-Section Analysis
DOE is proposing to amend 10 CFR Parts 600 and 1024 as follows.
1. Section 600.2 is amended by changing ``solicitation'' to
``funding opportunity announcement'' in paragraph (a) to be consistent
with section 600.
2. Section 600.3 is amended by capitalizing ``Contracting Officer''
in the definition of ``Amendment''; by adding definitions for ``Cost
sharing or matching'' and ``Total project cost'' to facilitate changes
made in section 600.30, ``Cost Sharing.''
3. Section 600.4 is amended to add a reference to section 600.304
in paragraph (a) that was not incorporated at the time Subpart D was
added to Part 600.
4. Section 600.6 is amended in paragraphs (b), (b)(1), and (c)(7)
by changing ``solicitation'' to ``funding opportunity announcement'' to
be consistent with section 600.8. Paragraphs (b) and (d) are amended to
restate the concurrence and approval requirements in plain English.
This revision is not intended to alter substantially the concurrence
and approval requirements.
5. Section 600.8 has been renamed ``Funding Opportunity
Announcement'' to more accurately reflect the coverage of this section.
Paragraphs (a), (a)(1), and (a)(2) are amended by deleting
``solicitation'' and ``program announcement'' and replacing with
``funding opportunity announcement'' or its acronym ``FOA.''
6. Section 600.10 is amended to add the requirement for all
applicants to be registered in the Central Contractor Registration and
to make changes related to the receipt of applications electronically.
7. Section 600.11 is deleted in its entirety as this information
more accurately belongs in a funding opportunity announcement when
applicable.
8. Section 600.12 is deleted in its entirety as the requirements of
assurances and certifications have been incorporated Government-wide in
the standard application forms maintained by Grants.gov.
9. Section 600.14 is marked as reserved for consistency and clarity
with the rest of Part 600.
10. Section 600.15 is amended by changing ``solicitation'' to
``funding opportunity announcement'' in paragraph (b)(2) for clarity
and consistency with the rest of Part 600.
11. Section 600.16 is amended by inserting a new paragraph (b) that
describes a recipient's acceptance of an award and redesignating the
old paragraph (b) as paragraph (c).
12. Section 600.17 is amended to facilitate changes to
administration requirements.
13. Section 600.18 is deleted in its entirety. The recipient's
responsibility for acceptance of an award has been moved to section
600.16.
14. Section 600.19 is amended by deleting, in the second sentence,
the word ``briefly'' and the phrase ``and, if for grounds other than
unavailability of funds, shall offer the unsuccessful applicant the
opportunity for a more detailed explanation upon request'' as the
applicant may always request additional information no matter the
reason for the unsuccessful application.
15. Section 600.21 is amended by adding a cross reference to the
applicable section of Subpart D in paragraph (a) that was not
incorporated at the time Subpart D was added to Part 600.
16. Section 600.22 is amended to update the section for changes to
the Financial Assistance Appeals Board. The Financial Assistance
Appeals Board was staffed by the Energy Board of Contract Appeals which
was abolished by Section 847 of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2006, Public Law No. 109-163. The Department is
maintaining the right of recipients to appeal certain Contracting
Officer's determinations by providing for appeals to the DOE or
National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Senior Procurement
Executive (SPE) in place of the now defunct appeals board.
Specifically, the reference to 10 CFR 1024 in paragraph (a) is deleted
as this Part is being removed by this proposed rulemaking; paragraph
(d) is updated with the correct contact information for the two SPEs;
paragraphs (e) and (f) are updated by changing the reference to the
Board
[[Page 28387]]
to SPEs. Paragraph (f) is also updated to include references to the
applicable sections of Subpart D of this part that were not added at
the time Subpart D was implemented.
17. Section 600.23 is deleted in its entirety as this information
has recently been moved to Title 2 of the CFR as part of the
implementation of the OMB guidance provided at 2 CFR Part 180 and as
part of OMB's initiative to streamline and consolidate all federal
regulations on nonprocurement debarment and suspension.
18. Section 600.24 is amended by adding references to Subpart D of
10 CFR part 600 in addition to Subparts B and C that were not updated
as part of the rulemaking that added Subpart D in 2003.
19. Section 600.25 is amended by adding references to Subpart D of
10 CFR Part 600 in addition to Subparts B and C that were not updated
as part of the rulemaking that added Subpart D in 2003 and to delete
certain references to Subparts B, C and D that do not require written
notification as previously indicated in Section 600.25.
20. Section 600.26 is deleted in its entirety as it is duplicative
of sections in other areas of Part 600.
21. Section 600.28 is deleted in its entirety as it is duplicative
of sections in other areas of Part 600 and 10 CFR Part 601.
22. Section 600.29 is amended to raise the dollar threshold to
provide greater flexibility to Contracting Officers and recipients in
award and administration of financial assistance agreements.
23. Section 600.30 is amended to incorporate the requirements of
section 988 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Public Law No. 109-58,
which standardized cost sharing requirements for research and
development activities.
24. Section 600.31 is amended by capitalizing all references to
Contracting Officer for consistency purposes.
25. Section 600.112 is amended by changing ``solicitation'' to
``funding opportunity announcement'' to be consistent with 600.8;
deleting paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2) and (b)(1) in order to delete
requirements to use specific DOE forms as DOE is using the forms
maintained by Grants.gov for applying for financial assistance as part
of an overall government-wide policy; and renumbering paragraphs (b)(2)
and (c) as paragraphs (c) and (d).
26. Section 600.113 is amended to correct the citation for
``Debarment and Suspension'' to 2 CFR Parts 180 and 901.
27. Section 600.117 is deleted in its entirety as representations,
certifications and assurances are now received through the submission
of standard application forms with government-wide changes due to the
implementation of Grants.gov.
28. Section 600.305 is amended to correct the citation for
Debarment and Suspension to 2 CFR Parts 180 and 901.
29. DOE is proposing to remove Part 1024 in its entirety as the
Financial Assistance Appeals Board, staffed by the Energy Board of
Contract Appeals, was abolished by the Department to comply with
section 847 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2006, Public Law No. 109-163. The Department is maintaining the right
of recipients to appeal Contracting Officer's determinations by
providing for appeals to the DOE or NNSA Senior Procurement Executive
(SPE) in place of the now defunct appeals board. See 10 CFR Part 600.22
as amended by this proposed rulemaking.
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
This regulatory action has been determined not to be ``a
significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, 58 FR 51735 (October 4, 1993). Accordingly, this
action is not subject to review under that Executive Order by the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) of OMB.
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires
preparation of an initial regulatory flexibility analysis for any rule
that by law must be proposed for public comment, unless the agency
certifies that the rule, if promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. As required
by Executive Order 13272, Proper Consideration of Small Entities in
Agency Rulemaking, 67 FR 53461 (August 16, 2002), DOE published
procedures and policies to ensure that the potential impacts of its
draft rules on small entities are properly considered during the
rulemaking process, 68 FR 7990 (February 19, 2003), and has made them
available on the Office of General Counsel's Web site: https://
www.gc.doe.gov. DOE has reviewed today's rule under the provisions of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act and the procedures and policies
published on February 19, 2003. Today's proposed rule would subject
small entities either to requirements that parallel government-wide
requirements that OMB Circular A-110 establishes for other assistance
awards, or to less burdensome requirements that enable firms from the
commercial marketplace to participate in DOE research, development, and
demonstration projects. Today's proposed amendments would not alter the
substance of the OMB requirements or impose significant additional
burdens. On the basis of the foregoing, DOE certifies that the rule
does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. DOE did not prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis
for this rulemaking.
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This regulatory action will not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements subject to approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act
DOE has concluded that promulgation of this rule falls into a class
of actions that would not individually or cumulatively have a
significant impact on the human environment, as determined by DOE's
regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). Specifically, this rule establishes
guidelines and procedures for application and review, administration,
audit and closeout of assistance instruments, and, therefore, is
covered under the Categorical Exclusion in paragraph A6 of Appendix A
to Subpart D, 10 CFR Part 1021. Accordingly, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, 64 FR 43255 (August 4, 1999), imposes
certain requirements on agencies formulating and implementing policies
or regulations that preempt state law or that have federalism
implications. Agencies are required to examine the constitutional and
statutory authority supporting any action that would limit the
policymaking discretion of the states and carefully assess the
necessity for such actions. DOE has examined today's proposed rule and
has determined that it does not preempt state law and does not have a
substantial direct effect on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. No further
action is required by Executive Order 13132.
[[Page 28388]]
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing regulations and the
promulgation of new regulations, section 3(a) of Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform, 61 FR 4729 (February 7, 1996), imposes on
executive agencies the general duty to adhere to the following
requirements: (1) Eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity; (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation; (3) provide a clear legal standard
for affected conduct rather than a general standard; and (4) promote
simplification and burden reduction. Section 3(b) of Executive Order
12988 specifically requires that executive agencies make every
reasonable effort to ensure that the regulation: (1) Clearly specifies
the preemptive effect, if any; (2) clearly specifies any effect on
existing federal law or regulation; (3) provides a clear legal standard
for affected conduct while promoting simplification and burden
reduction; (4) specifies the retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately
defines key terms; and (6) addresses other important issues affecting
clarity and general draftsmanship under any guidelines issued by the
United States Attorney General. Section 3(c) of Executive Order 12988
requires executive agencies to review regulations in light of
applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b) to determine whether
they are met or if it is unreasonable to meet one or more of them. DOE
has completed the required review and determined that, to the extent
permitted by law, this rule meets the relevant standards of Executive
Order 12988.
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, Public Law No. 104-4,
generally requires federal agencies to examine closely the impacts of
regulatory actions on state, local, or tribal governments. Subsection
101(5) of Title I of that law defines a federal intergovernmental
mandate to include a regulation that would impose upon state, local, or
tribal governments an enforceable duty, except a condition of federal
assistance or a duty arising from participating in a voluntary federal
program. Title II of that law requires each Federal agency to assess
the effects of Federal regulatory actions on state, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or the private sector, other than to the
extent such actions merely incorporate requirements specifically set
forth in a statute. Section 202 of the title requires a federal agency
to perform a detailed assessment of the anticipated costs and benefits
of any rule that includes a Federal mandate which may result in costs
to state, local, or tribal governments, or the private sector, of $100
million or more in any one year (adjusted annually for inflation). 2
U.S.C. 1532(a) and (b). Section 204 of that title requires each agency
that proposed a rule containing a significant federal intergovernmental
mandate to develop an effective process for obtaining meaningful and
timely input from elected officers of state, local, and tribal
governments. 2 U.S.C. 1534.
This proposed rule would amend the assistance regulations with
changes that streamline and simplify procedures for soliciting,
awarding, and administering financial assistance agreements. The
proposed rule would not result in the expenditure by state, local, and
tribal governments, in aggregate, or by the private sector of $100
million or more in any one year. Accordingly, no assessment or analysis
is required under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999, Public Law No. 105-277, requires federal agencies to issue a
Family Policymaking Assessment for any proposed rule or policy that may
affect family well-being. This rule will not have any impact on the
autonomy or integrity of the family as an institution. Accordingly, DOE
has concluded that it is not necessary to prepare a Family Policymaking
Assessment.
I. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
2001
The Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2001, 44
U.S.C. 3516 note, provides for agencies to review most disseminations
of information to the public under implementing guidelines established
by each agency pursuant to general guidelines issued by OMB. OMB's
guidelines were published at 67 FR 8452 (February 22, 2002), and DOE's
guidelines were published at 67 FR 62446 (October 7, 2002). DOE has
reviewed today's rule under the OMB and DOE guidelines and has
concluded that it is consistent with applicable policies in those
guidelines.
J. Review Under Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use, 66 FR 28355
(May 22, 2001), requires federal agencies to prepare and submit to the
OMB a Statement of Energy Effects for any proposed significant energy
action. A ``significant energy action'' is defined as any action by an
agency that promulgated or is expected to lead to promulgation of a
final rule, and that: (1) Is a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866, or any successor order; and (2) is likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy; or (3) is designated by the Administrator of OIRA as a
significant energy action. For any proposed significant energy action,
the agency must give a detailed statement of any adverse effects on
energy supply, distribution, or use should the proposal be implemented,
and of reasonable alternatives to the action and their expected
benefits on energy supply, distribution, and use.
This regulatory action would not have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of energy and is therefore not a
significant energy action. Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a
Statement of Energy Effects.
K. Approval by the Office of the Secretary of Energy
The Office of the Secretary has approved the issuance of this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Parts 600 and 1024
Administrative practice and procedure, Assistance programs.
Edward R. Simpson,
Director, Office of Procurement and Assistance Management, Office of
Management, Department of Energy
David O. Boyd,
Director, Office of Acquisition and Supply Management, National Nuclear
Security Administration.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, Part 600 of Chapter II,
and Part 1024 of Chapter X, Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
are proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 600--FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE RULES
1. The authority citation for part 600 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.; 31 U.S.C. 6301-6308; 50
U.S.C. 2401 et seq., unless otherwise noted.
Sec. 600.2 [Amended]
2. Section 600.2 is amended in paragraph (a) by removing
``solicitations'' and adding ``funding
[[Page 28389]]
opportunity announcements'' in its place.
3. Section 600.3 is amended in the definition of ``Amendment'' by
capitalizing ``Contracting Officer'', and by adding new definitions in
alphabetical order for ``Cost sharing or matching'' and ``Total Project
Cost'' to read as follows:
Sec. 600.3 Definitions.
* * * * *
Cost sharing or matching means that portion of project or program
costs not borne by the Federal Government.
* * * * *
Total Project Cost means all allowable costs, as set forth in the
applicable federal cost principles, incurred in accomplishing the
objective of the project during the project period, including the value
of contributions made by third parties and costs incurred by Federally
Funded Research and Development Centers.
4. Section 600.4 paragraph (a)(1) is amended by revising the second
sentence to read as follows:
Sec. 600.4 Deviations.
(a) General. (1) * * * The use of optional or discretionary
provisions of this part, including special restrictive conditions used
in accordance with Sec. Sec. 600.114, 600.212, and 600.304 are not
deviations. * * *
* * * * *
5. Section 600.6 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 600.6 Eligibility.
(a) General. DOE shall solicit applications for financial
assistance in a manner which provides for the maximum amount of
competition feasible.
(b) Restricted eligibility. If DOE restricts eligibility, an
explanation of why the restriction of eligibility is considered
necessary shall be included in the funding opportunity announcement,
program rule, or published notice.
(1) If the aggregate amount of DOE funds available for award under
a funding opportunity announcement or published notice is $1 million or
more, unless authorized by statute or program rule, such restriction of
eligibility shall be:
(i) Supported by a written determination initiated by the program
office;
(ii) Concurred in by legal counsel and the Contracting Officer; and
(iii) Approved by an official no less than one level below the
responsible program Assistant Secretary, Deputy Administrator, or other
official of equivalent authority.
(2) Where the amount of DOE funds is less than $1 million, the
cognizant Head of Contracting Activity (HCA) and the Contracting
Officer may approve the determination.
(c) Noncompetitive financial assistance. DOE may award a grant or
cooperative agreement on a noncompetitive basis only if the application
satisfies one or more of the following selection criteria:
(1) The activity to be funded is necessary to the satisfactory
completion of, or is a continuation or renewal of, an activity
presently being funded by DOE or another Federal agency, and for which
competition for support would have a significant adverse effect on
continuity or completion of the activity.
(2) The activity is being or would be conducted by the applicant
using its own resources or those donated or provided by third parties;
however, DOE support of that activity would enhance the public benefits
to be derived and DOE knows of no other entity which is conducting or
is planning to conduct such an activity.
(3) The applicant is a unit of government and the activity to be
supported is related to the performance of a governmental function
within the subject jurisdiction, thereby precluding DOE provision of
support to another entity.
(4) The applicant has exclusive domestic capability to perform the
activity successfully, based upon unique equipment, proprietary data,
technical expertise, or other such unique qualifications.
(5) The award implements an agreement between the United States
Government and a foreign government to fund a foreign applicant.
(6) Time constraints associated with a public health, safety,
welfare or national security requirement preclude competition.
(7) The proposed project was submitted as an unsolicited proposal
and represents a unique or innovative idea, method, or approach which
would not be eligible for financial assistance under a recent, current,
or planned funding opportunity announcement, and if, as determined by
DOE, a competitive funding opportunity announcement would not be
appropriate.
(8) The responsible program Assistant Secretary, Deputy
Administrator, or other official of equivalent authority determines
that a noncompetitive award is in the public interest. This authority
may not be delegated.
(d) Approval requirements. (1) Where the amount of DOE funds is $1
million or greater, determinations of noncompetitive awards shall be:
(i) Documented in writing;
(ii) Concurred in by the responsible program technical official and
local legal counsel; and
(iii) Approved, prior to award, by the responsible program
Assistant Secretary, Deputy Administrator, or official of equivalent
authority and the Contracting Officer. The approval authority may be
delegated to one organizational level below the Assistant Secretary,
Deputy Administrator, or official of equivalent authority.
(2) Where the amount of DOE funds is less than $1 million,
determinations of noncompetitive awards shall be:
(i) Documented in writing;
(ii) Concurred in by local legal counsel, unless for a particular
award or class of awards of $1 million or less, review is waived by
legal counsel; and
(iii) Approved by the cognizant HCA and the Contracting Officer.
Sec. 600.8 Funding opportunity announcement.
6. Section 600.8 is amended as follows:
a. The section heading is revised as set forth above.
b. In paragraph (a) introductory text, the first sentence is
amended by removing ``Program announcement'' and adding ``Funding
Opportunity Announcements (FOA)'' in its place.
c. In paragraph (a)(1), the last sentence is amended by removing
``Solicitations'' and adding ``FOAs'' in its place.
d. In paragraph (a)(2) introductory text, the first sentence is
amended by removing ``Program announcements'' and adding ``FOAs'' in
its place.
7. Section 600.10 is amended as follows:
a. In paragraph (b), the first sentence is amended by removing
``and in the number of copies''
b. In paragraph (c)(1), the second sentence is amended by removing
``or other approved DOE application form''
c. Paragraph (c)(4) is removed.
d. A new paragraph (f) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 600.10 Form and content of application.
* * * * *
(f) Registration is required in the Central Contractor Registration
(CCR) for all applications. Information on registration can be obtained
at https://www.ccr.gov/Grantees.aspx.
Sec. Sec. 600.11 and 600.12 [Removed]
8. Sections 600.11 and 600.12 are removed and reserved.
[[Page 28390]]
Sec. 600.14 [Reserved]
9. Section 600.14 is added and reserved.
Sec. 600.15 [Amended]
10. Section 600.15, paragraph (b)(2) is amended by removing
``solicitation'' and adding ``funding opportunity announcement'' in its
place.
11. Section 600.16, is amended by redesignating paragraph (b) as
paragraph (c), and by adding a new paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 600.16 Legal authority and effect of an award.
* * * * *
(b) Recipients are free to accept or reject the award. A request to
drawdown DOE funds constitutes acceptance; however DOE may require
formal acceptance of an award.
* * * * *
12. Section 600.17 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 600.17 Contents of Award.
Each financial assistance award shall be made on a cover agreement
page, which contains basic identifying and funding information. The
award will identify special terms and conditions, program regulations,
the National Policy Assurances, and any other provisions necessary to
establish the respective right, duties, obligations, and
responsibilities of DOE and the recipient, consistent with the
requirements of this part.
Sec. 600.18 [Removed]
13. Section 600.18 is removed and reserved.
Sec. 600.19 [Amended]
14. Section 600.19 is amended by removing, in the second sentence,
``briefly'' and ``and, if for grounds other than unavailability of
funds, shall offer the unsuccessful applicant the opportunity for a
more detailed explanation upon request''.
Sec. 600.21 [Amended]
15. Section 600.21, paragraph (a) is amended by removing
``Sec. Sec. 600.153 and 600.242'' and adding ``Sec. Sec. 600.153,
600.242 and 600.342'' in its place.
16. Section 600.22 is amended as follows:
a. In the last sentence of paragraph (a), the words ``available in
10 CFR Part 1024'' are removed.
b. Paragraphs (d) and (f)(1) are revised.
c. Paragraphs (e), (f)(2), (f)(3) and (f)(4) are amended by
removing ``Board'' and adding `` SPE'' in its place, for every
occurrence.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 600.22 Disputes and appeals.
* * * * *
(d) Right of appeal. Except as provided in paragraph (f)(1) of this
section, the final determination under paragraph (c) of this section
may be appealed to the cognizant SPE for either DOE or the National
Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). The mailing address for the DOE
SPE is Office of Procurement and Assistance Management, 1000
Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20585. The mailing address for
the NNSA SPE is Office of Acquisition and Supply Management, 1000
Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20585.
* * * * *
(f) Review on appeal. (1) The SPE shall have no jurisdiction to
review
(i) Any preaward dispute (except as provided in paragraph
(f)(2)(ii) of this section), including use of any special restrictive
condition pursuant to Sec. Sec. 600.114, 600.212, or 600.304;
(ii) DOE denial of a request for a deviation under Sec. Sec.
600.4, 600.103, 600.205, or 600.303 of this part;
(iii) DOE denial of a request for a budget revision or other change
in the approved project under Sec. Sec. 600.125, 600.127, 600.222,
600.230, 600.315, or 600.317 of this part or under another term or
condition of the award;
(iv) Any DOE action authorized under Sec. Sec. 600.162(a)(1), (2),
(3) or (5); 600.243(a)(1), (a)(3), or Sec. Sec. 600.352(a)(1), (2),
(3) or (5) for suspensions only; or Sec. Sec. 600.162(a)(4),
600.243(a)(4) or 600.352(a)(4) for actions disapproving renewal
applications or other requests for extension of time or additional
funding for the same project when related to recipient noncompliance,
or such actions authorized by program rule;
(v) Any DOE decision about an action requiring prior DOE approval
under Sec. Sec. 600.144, 600.236, or 600.331 of this part or under
another term or condition of the award; * * *
Sec. 600.23 [Removed]
17. Section 600.23 is removed and reserved.
Sec. 600.24 [Amended]
18. Section 600.24 is amended in paragraphs (a)(3) and (b)
introductory text by removing ``or Sec. 600.243(a)'' and adding
``Sec. Sec. 600.243(a), 600.312(g) or 600.352(a)'' in its place.
19. Section 600.25 is amended in:
a. Paragraph (a)(1) by removing ``or Sec. 600.243(a)'' and adding
``Sec. 600.243(a) or 600.352(a)'' in its place.
b. Paragraph (a)(2) by removing ``Sec. 600.23'' and adding ``2 CFR
Part 180 and 901'' in its place.
c. Paragraph (b) is revised.
d. Paragraph (d) by removing ``or Sec. Sec. 600.243 through
600.244'' and adding ``Sec. Sec. 600.243 through 600.244 or Sec. Sec.
600.350 through 600.353'' in its place.
e. Paragraph (f) by removing ``or Sec. Sec. 600.243 through
600.244'' and adding ``Sec. Sec. 600.243 through 600.244 or Sec. Sec.
600.350 through 600.353'' in its place.
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 600.25 Suspension and termination.
* * * * *
(b) Notification requirements. Except as provided in Sec. Sec.
600.24, 600.162(a) , 600.243(a) or 600.352(a) before suspending or
terminating an award for cause, DOE shall mail to the awardee (by
certified mail, return receipt requested) a separate written notice in
addition to that required by Sec. 600.24(a) at least ten days prior to
the effective date of the suspension or termination. Such notice shall
include, as appropriate:
(1) The factual and legal basis for the suspension or termination;
(2) The effective date or dates of the DOE action;
(3) If the action does not apply to the entire award, a description
of the activities affected by the action;
(4) Instructions concerning which costs shall be allowable during
the period of suspension, or instructions concerning allowable
termination costs, including in either case, instructions concerning
any subgrants or contracts;
(5) Instructions concerning required final reports and other
closeout actions for terminated awards (see Sec. Sec. 600.170 through
600.173, Sec. Sec. 600.250 through 600.252 and Sec. Sec. 600.350
through 600.353);
(6) A statement of the awardees' right to appeal a termination for
cause pursuant to section 600.22; and
(7) The dated signature of a DOE Contracting Officer.
* * * * *
Sec. 600.26 [Removed]
20. Section 600.26 is removed and reserved.
Sec. 600.28 [Removed]
21. Section 600.28 is removed and reserved.
Sec. 600.29 [Amended]
22. Section 600.29 is amended as follows:
a. Paragraph (b)(1), ``$100,000'' is removed and ``$250,000'' is
added in its place.
b. In paragraphs (b)(5) and (b)(6) ``Contracting Officer'' is
capitalized.
[[Page 28391]]
23. Section 600.30 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 600.30 Cost sharing.
In addition to the requirements of Sec. Sec. 600.123, 600.224, or
600.313, the following requirements apply to research, development,
demonstration and commercial application activities projects:
(a) Cost sharing is required for most financial assistance awards
for research, development, demonstration and commercial applications
activities initiated after the enactment of the Energy Policy Act of
2005 on August 8, 2005. This requirement does not apply to:
(1) An award under the small business innovation research program
or the small business technology transfer program; or
(2) A program with cost sharing requirements defined by other than
Section 988 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 including other sections
of the 2005 Act and the Energy Policy Act of 1992.
(b) A cost share of at least 20 percent of the cost of the activity
is required for research and development except where:
(1) A research or development activity of a basic or fundamental
nature has been excluded by an appropriate officer of the Department,
generally an Under Secretary; or
(2) The Secretary or delegatee has determined it is necessary and
appropriate to reduce or eliminate the cost sharing requirement for a
research and development activity of an applied nature.
(c) A cost share of at least 50 percent of the cost of a
demonstration or commercial application program or activity is required
unless the Secretary or delegatee has determined that it is necessary
and appropriate to reduce the cost sharing requirements, taking into
consideration any technological risk relating to the activity.
(d) Cost share shall be provided by non-Federal funds unless
otherwise authorized by statute. In calculating the amount of the non-
Federal contribution:
(1) Base the non-Federal contribution on total project costs,
including the cost of work where funds are provided directly to a
partner, consortium member or subrecipient, such as a Federally Funded
Research and Development Center;
(2) Include the following costs as allowable in accordance with the
applicable cost principles:
(i) Cash;
(ii) Personnel costs;
(iii) The value of a service, other resource, or third party in-
kind contribution determined in accordance with the applicable Circular
of the Office of Management and Budget;
(iv) Indirect costs or facilities and administrative costs; and/or
(v) Any funds received under the power program of the Tennessee
Valley Authority (except to the extent that such funds are made
available under an annual appropriation Act);
(3) Exclude the following costs:
(i) Revenues or royalties from the prospective operation of an
activity beyond the time considered in the award;
(ii) Proceeds from the prospective sale of an asset of an activity;
or
(iii) Other appropriated Federal funds.
(iv) Repayment of the Federal share of a cost-shared activity under
Section 988 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 shall not be a condition
of the award.
Sec. 600.31 [Amended]
24. Section 600.31 is amended as follows:
a. In paragraph (c), Contracting Officer is capitalized in all
occurrences.
b. In paragraph (d) introductory text, Contracting Officer is
capitalized.
c. In paragraph (f)(5), Contracting Officer is capitalized.
25. Section 600.112 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 600.112 Forms for applying for Federal assistance.
(a) An application for an award shall be on the form or in the
format specified in a program rule or in the funding opportunity
announcement. When a version of the Standard Form 424 is not used, DOE
shall indicate whether the application is subject to review by the
State under Executive Order 12372.
(b) DOE may request and the applicant shall submit the minimum
budgetary information necessary to evaluate the costs of the proposed
project.
(c) DOE may, subsequent to receipt of an application, request
additional information from an applicant when necessary for
clarification or to make informed preaward determinations.
(d) DOE may require that an application for a continuation or
renewal award be made in the format or on the forms authorized by
paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
Sec. 600.113 [Amended]
26. Section 600.113 is amended by removing ``10 CFR 1036'' and
adding ``2 CFR 180 and 901'' in its place.
Sec. 600.117 [Removed]
27. Section 600.117 is removed and reserved.
Sec. 600.305 [Amended]
28. Section 600.305 is amended by removing ``10 CFR 1036'' and
adding ``2 CFR 180 and 901'' in its place.
29. Under the authority of the Department of Energy Organization
Act, Public Law 95-91, 91 Stat. 577 (42 U.S.C. 7101, et seq.); E.O.
10789; Public Law 95-224, 92 Stat. 3 (41 U.S.C. 501-509), part 1024 is
removed.
PART 1024--[REMOVED]
[FR Doc. E8-11005 Filed 5-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P