Regional Habitat Conservation Plan, Hays County, TX, 28497-28498 [E8-10941]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Notices
Dated: May 12, 2008.
Susan K. Moore,
Field Supervisor, Sacramento Fish and
Wildlife Office, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. E8–10994 Filed 5–15–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R2–ES–2008–N0086; 20124–
11120000–F2]
Regional Habitat Conservation Plan,
Hays County, TX
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement;
announcement of public scoping
meeting; request for comments.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), advise the
public that we intend to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
to evaluate the impacts of, and
alternatives to, the proposed issuance of
an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) under
the Endangered Species Act of 1973
(Act), as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.) to Hays County, Texas (Applicant).
We also announce a public scoping
meeting and public comment period.
DATES: We must receive written
comments on alternatives and issues to
be addressed in the EIS by July 18, 2008.
We will hold a public scoping meeting
on June 18, 2008, from 5:30 p.m. to 8:30
p.m. at the San Marcos Activity Center,
501 E. Hopkins Road, San Marcos, TX
78666.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments or
request for information by any one of
the following methods:
• U.S. mail: Field Supervisor, Fish
and Wildlife Service, 10711 Burnet
Road, Suite 200, Austin, TX 78758.
• Facsimile: 512–490–0974.
• E-mail: info@hayscountyhcp.com.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
• EIS Information: Ms. Allison Arnold,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 10711
Burnet Road, Suite 200, Austin, TX
78758; 512–490–0057 (phone); 512–
490–0974 (fax); or
Allison_Arnold@fws.gov (e-mail).
• Hays County RHCP Information:
County Judge Liz Sumter, 111 E. San
Antonio St., Suite 300, San Marcos, TX
78666; 512–393–2205 (phone); or 512–
393–2282 (fax).
• Other Information: You may obtain
additional information on the Hays
County RHCP on the Internet at https://
www.hayscountyhcp.com.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:18 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
We intend
to prepare an EIS to evaluate the
impacts of, and alternatives to, the
proposed issuance of an ITP under the
Act, to the Applicant. We also announce
a public scoping meeting and public
comment period. The Applicant
proposes to apply for an ITP supported
by development and implementation of
the Hays County Regional Habitat
Conservation Plan (RHCP). The Hays
County RHCP will include measures
necessary to minimize and mitigate the
impacts of the proposed taking on the
federally-listed species. We furnish this
notice in compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.), and its implementing regulations
(40 CFR 1500–1508), in order to: (1)
Advise other Federal and state agencies,
affected tribes, and the public of our
intent to prepare an EIS; (2) announce
the initiation of a public scoping period;
and (3) obtain suggestions and
information on the scope of issues and
alternatives we will consider in our EIS.
We intend to gather the information
necessary to determine impacts and
alternatives for an EIS regarding our
potential issuance of an ITP to the
Applicant, and the implementation of
the Hays County RHCP.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
Section 9 of the Act and its
implementing regulations prohibit take
of species listed under the Act as
endangered or threatened. The
definition of ‘‘take’’ under the Act
includes the following activities: To
harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot,
wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect
listed animal species, or attempt to
engage in any such conduct (16 U.S.C.
1538). Regulations define ‘‘harm’’ as
significant habitat modification or
degradation that results in actual death
or injury to the listed species by
significantly impairing essential
behavioral patterns, including breeding,
feeding, or sheltering (50 CFR 17.3).
Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act requires
us to issue ITPs to non-Federal entities
for take of endangered and threatened
species, provided the following criteria
are met: (1) The taking will be
incidental; (2) the applicant will, to the
maximum extent practicable, minimize
and mitigate the impact of such taking;
(3) the applicant will develop a habitat
conservation plan and ensure that
adequate funding for the plan will be
provided; (4) the taking will not
appreciably reduce the likelihood of the
survival and recovery of the species in
the wild; and (5) the applicant will carry
out any other measures that we may
require as being necessary or
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28497
appropriate for the purposes of the
habitat conservation plan.
We anticipate that under the ITP, the
Applicant will request coverage for a
period of 30 years from the date of the
RHCP approval. Implementation of the
Hays County RHCP would result in the
establishment of preserves intended to
provide for the conservation of the
covered species occupying those
preserves. Research, monitoring, and
adaptive management would be used to
facilitate accomplishment of these goals.
Proposed Action
The proposed action is the issuance of
an ITP for the covered species in Hays
County. The Applicant would develop
and implement the Hays County RHCP,
which must meet the requirements in
section 10(a)(2)(A) of the Act by
providing measures necessary to
minimize and mitigate the impacts of
the proposed taking on the covered
species.
Activities proposed for coverage
under the ITP include otherwise lawful
activities that would occur consistent
with the Hays County RHCP and
include, but are not limited to,
construction and maintenance of public
projects and infrastructure as well as
residential, commercial, and industrial
development.
Species the Applicant has
recommended for inclusion as covered
species in the Hays County RHCP
include the golden-cheeked warbler
(Dendroica chrysoparia) and blackcapped vireo (Vireo atricapilla). For
these covered species, Hays County
would seek incidental take
authorization. The Hays County RHCP
would also address 40 ‘‘evaluation
species’’ (39 terrestrial or aquatic karst
species and the Cagle’s map turtle
(Graptemys caglei)) and 15 ‘‘additional
species’’ (6 listed aquatic species, 3
unlisted plants, and 6 unlisted surface
aquatic species). Incidental take
authorization for the evaluation species
may become necessary to include in the
proposed ITP over the term of the Hays
County RHCP; however, these species
will not be initially included as
‘‘covered’’ species. Evaluation species
may be currently unlisted, but could
become listed in the foreseeable future.
The Hays County RHCP may include
conservation measures to benefit
evaluation species, where practicable,
and support research to help fill data
gaps regarding the biology, habitat,
distribution, or management of these
species. The research supported by the
RHCP may aide in the conservation of
these species or facilitate obtaining
incidental take coverage, if these species
become listed in the future. For the 15
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
28498
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 96 / Friday, May 16, 2008 / Notices
‘‘additional species,’’ Hays County
would not seek incidental take
authorization because these species
either are not currently listed as
threatened or endangered, or are not
likely to experience take from covered
activities, or insufficient information is
available to adequately evaluate take
and mitigation.
Alternatives
The proposed action and alternatives
that will be developed in the EIS will be
assessed against the No Action/No
Project Alternative, which assumes that
some or all of the current and future
take of covered species in Hays County
would be implemented individually,
one at a time, and be in compliance
with the Act. The No Action/No Project
alternative implies that the impacts
from these potential activities on the
covered species would be evaluated and
mitigated on a project-by-project basis,
as is currently the case. For any
activities involving take of listed species
due to non-Federal actions, individual
Section 10(a)(1)(B) permits would be
required. Without a coordinated,
comprehensive conservation approach
for Hays County, listed species may not
be adequately addressed by individual
project-specific mitigation requirements,
unlisted candidate and other rare
species would not receive proactive
conservation actions, and mitigation
would be less cost effective in helping
Federal and non-Federal agencies work
toward recovery of listed species.
Current independent conservation
actions would continue, although some
of these are not yet funded. A
reasonable range of alternatives would
also be considered, along with the
associated impacts of the various
alternatives.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Scoping Meeting
A primary purpose of the scoping
process is to receive suggestions and
information on the scope of issues and
alternatives to consider when drafting
the EIS, and to identify, rather than
debate, significant issues related to the
proposed action. In order to ensure that
we identify a range of issues and
alternatives related to the proposed
action, we invite comments and
suggestions from all interested parties.
We will accept oral and written
comments at this meeting. You may also
submit your comments to the address
listed in ADDRESSES. Once the draft EIS
RHCP are completed, additional
opportunity for public comment on the
content of these documents and an
additional public meeting will be
provided.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:18 May 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
We will conduct a review of this
project according to the requirements of
NEPA and its regulations; other
appropriate Federal laws, regulations,
policies, and guidance; and Service
procedures for compliance with those
regulations.
Persons needing reasonable
accommodations in order to attend and
participate in the public meeting should
contact the Service at the address below
no later than one week before the public
meeting. Information regarding this
proposed action is available in
alternative formats upon request.
Public Availability of Comments
All comments we receive become part
of the public record. Requests for
comments will be handled in
accordance with the Freedom of
Information Act, NEPA, and Service and
Department of the Interior policies and
procedures. Before including your
address, phone number, e-mail address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us to withhold your
personal identifying information from
public review, we cannot guarantee we
will be able to do so.
Environmental Review
The EIS will be prepared in
accordance with the requirements of
NEPA, its implementing regulations (40
CFR parts 1500–1508), other applicable
regulations, and the Service’s
procedures for compliance with those
regulations. The EIS will analyze the
proposed action, as well as a range of
reasonable alternatives and the
associated impacts of each. The EIS will
be the basis for our evaluation of
impacts to the covered species and the
range of alternatives to be addressed.
We expect the EIS to provide biological
descriptions of the affected species and
habitats, as well as the effects of the
proposed action on resources such as:
vegetation, wetlands, wildlife,
threatened or endangered species and
rare species, geology and soils, air
quality, water resources, flood control,
water quality, cultural resources
(prehistoric, historic, and traditional
cultural properties), land use,
recreation, water use, local economy,
and environmental justice.
After the environmental review is
complete, we will publish a notice of
availability along with a request for
comment on the draft EIS and the
applicant’s permit application, which
will include the Hays County RHCP.
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The draft EIS and RHCP are expected to
be completed and available to the public
by January 2009.
Thomas L. Bauer,
Acting Regional Director, Southwest Region,
Albuquerque, New Mexico.
[FR Doc. E8–10941 Filed 5–15–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R2–ES–2008–N0024]; [20124–1113–
0000–F2]
Williamson County Regional Habitat
Conservation Plan
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: draft
environmental impact statement, draft
habitat conservation plan, and permit
application; announcement of a public
hearing.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Williamson County, Texas
(Applicant), has applied to the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (Service) for an
incidental take permit (TE–181840–0)
under section 10(a)(1)(B) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973,
as amended. The requested permit,
which would be in effect for a period of
30 years, if granted, would authorize
incidental take of the following
federally listed species: Golden-cheeked
warbler (Dendroica chrysoparia), blackcapped vireo (Vireo atricapilla), Bone
Cave harvestman (Texella reyesi), and
Coffin Cave mold beetle (Batrisodes
texanus). The proposed take would
occur in Williamson County, Texas, as
a result of activities including, but not
limited to, road construction,
maintenance, and improvement
projects; utility construction and
maintenance; school development and
construction; public or private
construction and development; and land
clearing. Such actions cause effects to
upland (bird) and underground (karst)
habitats. Williamson County has
completed a draft Habitat Conservation
Plan (dHCP) as part of the application
package. We have issued a draft
environmental impact statement (dEIS)
that evaluates the impacts of, and
alternatives to, possible issuance of an
incidental take permit (ITP).
DATES: To ensure consideration, we
must receive written comments on or
before close of business (4:30 p.m. CST)
July 15, 2008. We will also accept oral
and written comments at a public
hearing to be held on June 16, 2008, 5
p.m.to 8 p.m., Williamson County
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 96 (Friday, May 16, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28497-28498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10941]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R2-ES-2008-N0086; 20124-11120000-F2]
Regional Habitat Conservation Plan, Hays County, TX
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement;
announcement of public scoping meeting; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), advise the
public that we intend to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) to evaluate the impacts of, and alternatives to, the proposed
issuance of an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (Act), as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) to Hays
County, Texas (Applicant). We also announce a public scoping meeting
and public comment period.
DATES: We must receive written comments on alternatives and issues to
be addressed in the EIS by July 18, 2008. We will hold a public scoping
meeting on June 18, 2008, from 5:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. at the San Marcos
Activity Center, 501 E. Hopkins Road, San Marcos, TX 78666.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments or request for information by any one of
the following methods:
U.S. mail: Field Supervisor, Fish and Wildlife Service,
10711 Burnet Road, Suite 200, Austin, TX 78758.
Facsimile: 512-490-0974.
E-mail: info@hayscountyhcp.com.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
EIS Information: Ms. Allison Arnold, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 10711 Burnet Road, Suite 200, Austin, TX 78758; 512-490-0057
(phone); 512-490-0974 (fax); or Allison_Arnold@fws.gov (e-mail).
Hays County RHCP Information: County Judge Liz Sumter, 111
E. San Antonio St., Suite 300, San Marcos, TX 78666; 512-393-2205
(phone); or 512-393-2282 (fax).
Other Information: You may obtain additional information
on the Hays County RHCP on the Internet at https://
www.hayscountyhcp.com.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We intend to prepare an EIS to evaluate the
impacts of, and alternatives to, the proposed issuance of an ITP under
the Act, to the Applicant. We also announce a public scoping meeting
and public comment period. The Applicant proposes to apply for an ITP
supported by development and implementation of the Hays County Regional
Habitat Conservation Plan (RHCP). The Hays County RHCP will include
measures necessary to minimize and mitigate the impacts of the proposed
taking on the federally-listed species. We furnish this notice in
compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA),
as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), and its implementing regulations
(40 CFR 1500-1508), in order to: (1) Advise other Federal and state
agencies, affected tribes, and the public of our intent to prepare an
EIS; (2) announce the initiation of a public scoping period; and (3)
obtain suggestions and information on the scope of issues and
alternatives we will consider in our EIS. We intend to gather the
information necessary to determine impacts and alternatives for an EIS
regarding our potential issuance of an ITP to the Applicant, and the
implementation of the Hays County RHCP.
Purpose and Need for Action
Section 9 of the Act and its implementing regulations prohibit take
of species listed under the Act as endangered or threatened. The
definition of ``take'' under the Act includes the following activities:
To harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or
collect listed animal species, or attempt to engage in any such conduct
(16 U.S.C. 1538). Regulations define ``harm'' as significant habitat
modification or degradation that results in actual death or injury to
the listed species by significantly impairing essential behavioral
patterns, including breeding, feeding, or sheltering (50 CFR 17.3).
Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act requires us to issue ITPs to non-
Federal entities for take of endangered and threatened species,
provided the following criteria are met: (1) The taking will be
incidental; (2) the applicant will, to the maximum extent practicable,
minimize and mitigate the impact of such taking; (3) the applicant will
develop a habitat conservation plan and ensure that adequate funding
for the plan will be provided; (4) the taking will not appreciably
reduce the likelihood of the survival and recovery of the species in
the wild; and (5) the applicant will carry out any other measures that
we may require as being necessary or appropriate for the purposes of
the habitat conservation plan.
We anticipate that under the ITP, the Applicant will request
coverage for a period of 30 years from the date of the RHCP approval.
Implementation of the Hays County RHCP would result in the
establishment of preserves intended to provide for the conservation of
the covered species occupying those preserves. Research, monitoring,
and adaptive management would be used to facilitate accomplishment of
these goals.
Proposed Action
The proposed action is the issuance of an ITP for the covered
species in Hays County. The Applicant would develop and implement the
Hays County RHCP, which must meet the requirements in section
10(a)(2)(A) of the Act by providing measures necessary to minimize and
mitigate the impacts of the proposed taking on the covered species.
Activities proposed for coverage under the ITP include otherwise
lawful activities that would occur consistent with the Hays County RHCP
and include, but are not limited to, construction and maintenance of
public projects and infrastructure as well as residential, commercial,
and industrial development.
Species the Applicant has recommended for inclusion as covered
species in the Hays County RHCP include the golden-cheeked warbler
(Dendroica chrysoparia) and black-capped vireo (Vireo atricapilla). For
these covered species, Hays County would seek incidental take
authorization. The Hays County RHCP would also address 40 ``evaluation
species'' (39 terrestrial or aquatic karst species and the Cagle's map
turtle (Graptemys caglei)) and 15 ``additional species'' (6 listed
aquatic species, 3 unlisted plants, and 6 unlisted surface aquatic
species). Incidental take authorization for the evaluation species may
become necessary to include in the proposed ITP over the term of the
Hays County RHCP; however, these species will not be initially included
as ``covered'' species. Evaluation species may be currently unlisted,
but could become listed in the foreseeable future. The Hays County RHCP
may include conservation measures to benefit evaluation species, where
practicable, and support research to help fill data gaps regarding the
biology, habitat, distribution, or management of these species. The
research supported by the RHCP may aide in the conservation of these
species or facilitate obtaining incidental take coverage, if these
species become listed in the future. For the 15
[[Page 28498]]
``additional species,'' Hays County would not seek incidental take
authorization because these species either are not currently listed as
threatened or endangered, or are not likely to experience take from
covered activities, or insufficient information is available to
adequately evaluate take and mitigation.
Alternatives
The proposed action and alternatives that will be developed in the
EIS will be assessed against the No Action/No Project Alternative,
which assumes that some or all of the current and future take of
covered species in Hays County would be implemented individually, one
at a time, and be in compliance with the Act. The No Action/No Project
alternative implies that the impacts from these potential activities on
the covered species would be evaluated and mitigated on a project-by-
project basis, as is currently the case. For any activities involving
take of listed species due to non-Federal actions, individual Section
10(a)(1)(B) permits would be required. Without a coordinated,
comprehensive conservation approach for Hays County, listed species may
not be adequately addressed by individual project-specific mitigation
requirements, unlisted candidate and other rare species would not
receive proactive conservation actions, and mitigation would be less
cost effective in helping Federal and non-Federal agencies work toward
recovery of listed species. Current independent conservation actions
would continue, although some of these are not yet funded. A reasonable
range of alternatives would also be considered, along with the
associated impacts of the various alternatives.
Scoping Meeting
A primary purpose of the scoping process is to receive suggestions
and information on the scope of issues and alternatives to consider
when drafting the EIS, and to identify, rather than debate, significant
issues related to the proposed action. In order to ensure that we
identify a range of issues and alternatives related to the proposed
action, we invite comments and suggestions from all interested parties.
We will accept oral and written comments at this meeting. You may also
submit your comments to the address listed in ADDRESSES. Once the draft
EIS RHCP are completed, additional opportunity for public comment on
the content of these documents and an additional public meeting will be
provided.
We will conduct a review of this project according to the
requirements of NEPA and its regulations; other appropriate Federal
laws, regulations, policies, and guidance; and Service procedures for
compliance with those regulations.
Persons needing reasonable accommodations in order to attend and
participate in the public meeting should contact the Service at the
address below no later than one week before the public meeting.
Information regarding this proposed action is available in alternative
formats upon request.
Public Availability of Comments
All comments we receive become part of the public record. Requests
for comments will be handled in accordance with the Freedom of
Information Act, NEPA, and Service and Department of the Interior
policies and procedures. Before including your address, phone number,
e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that your entire comment--including your
personal identifying information--may be made publicly available at any
time. While you can ask us to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee we will be able to
do so.
Environmental Review
The EIS will be prepared in accordance with the requirements of
NEPA, its implementing regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), other
applicable regulations, and the Service's procedures for compliance
with those regulations. The EIS will analyze the proposed action, as
well as a range of reasonable alternatives and the associated impacts
of each. The EIS will be the basis for our evaluation of impacts to the
covered species and the range of alternatives to be addressed. We
expect the EIS to provide biological descriptions of the affected
species and habitats, as well as the effects of the proposed action on
resources such as: vegetation, wetlands, wildlife, threatened or
endangered species and rare species, geology and soils, air quality,
water resources, flood control, water quality, cultural resources
(prehistoric, historic, and traditional cultural properties), land use,
recreation, water use, local economy, and environmental justice.
After the environmental review is complete, we will publish a
notice of availability along with a request for comment on the draft
EIS and the applicant's permit application, which will include the Hays
County RHCP. The draft EIS and RHCP are expected to be completed and
available to the public by January 2009.
Thomas L. Bauer,
Acting Regional Director, Southwest Region, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
[FR Doc. E8-10941 Filed 5-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-55-P