Innoko National Wildlife Refuge, McGrath, AK, 27842-27844 [E8-10810]
Download as PDF
27842
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 14, 2008 / Notices
Dated: May 6, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8–10552 Filed 5–13–08; 8:45 am]
Dated: May 5, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8–10553 Filed 5–13–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–M
BILLING CODE 4140–01–M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
National Institutes of Health
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
National Institute of Environmental
Health Sciences; Notice of Closed
Meeting
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request; Guam Visa Waiver
Agreement
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice
is hereby given of the following
meeting.
The meeting will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The contract proposals and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the contract
proposals, the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee: National Institute of
Environmental Health Sciences Special
Emphasis Panel; Literature Search and
Summary Report for the National Toxicology
Program.
Date: June 5, 2008.
Time: 9 a.m. to 2 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate contract
proposals.
Place: NIEHS/National Institutes of Health,
Building 4401, East Campus, 79 T.W.
Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC
27709.
Contact Person: RoseAnne M. McGee,
Associate Scientific Review Administrator,
Scientific Review Branch, Division of
Extramural Research and Training, Nat.
Institute of Environmental Health Sciences,
P.O. Box 12233, MD EC–30, Research
Triangle Park, NC 27709, (919) 541–0752,
mcgee1@niehs.nih.gov.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.115, Biometry and Risk
Estimation—Health Risks from
Environmental Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS
Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety
Training; 93.143, NIEHS Superfund
Hazardous Substances—Basic Research and
Education; 93.894, Resources and Manpower
Development in the Environmental Health
Sciences; 93.113, Biological Response to
Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114,
Applied Toxicological Research and Testing,
National Institutes of Health, HHS)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:39 May 13, 2008
Jkt 214001
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: 60-Day Notice and request for
comments; Extension of an existing
collection of information: 1651–0126.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
comment on an information collection
requirement concerning the Guam Visa
Waiver Agreement (Form I–760). This
request for comment is being made
pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act (Pub. L. 104–13; 44 U.S.C.
3505(c)(2)).
Written comments should be
received on or before July 14, 2008, to
be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
Attn.: Tracey Denning, 1300
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 3.2C,
Washington, DC 20229.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to the U.S. Customs
and Border Protection, Attn.: Tracey
Denning, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., Room 3.2C, Washington, DC
20229, Tel. (202) 344–1429.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CBP
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections pursuant to the Paperwork
Reduction Act (Pub. L. 104–13; 44
U.S.C. 3505(c)(2)). The comments
should address: (a) Whether the
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimates of the burden of the
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; (d)
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ways to minimize the burden including
the use of automated collection
techniques or the use of other forms of
information technology; and (e)
estimates of capital or start-up costs and
costs of operations, maintenance, and
purchase of services to provide
information. The comments that are
submitted will be summarized and
included in the CBP request for Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
approval. All comments will become a
matter of public record. In this
document CBP is soliciting comments
concerning the following information
collection:
Title: Guam Visa Waiver Agreement.
OMB Number: 1651–0126.
Form Number: I–760.
Abstract: This Agreement is intended
to ensure that every alien transported to
Guam pursuant to Public Law 99–396
meets all of the stipulated eligibility
criteria prior to departure to Guam. It
also outlines the requirements to be
satisfied by the carrier.
Current Actions: There are no changes
to the information collection. This
submission is being submitted to extend
the expiration date.
Type of Review: Extension (without
change).
Affected Public: Individuals.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 5.
Estimated Number of Responses: 5.
Estimated Time per Response: 12
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 1.
Dated: May 8, 2008.
Tracey Denning,
Agency Clearance Officer, Customs and
Border Protection.
[FR Doc. E8–10805 Filed 5–13–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Innoko National Wildlife Refuge,
McGrath, AK
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Availability of the
Draft Revised Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Environmental
Assessment for Innoko National
Wildlife Refuge; request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service, we),
announce that the Draft Revised
Comprehensive Conservation Plan
(Draft CCP) and Environmental
Assessment (EA) for the southern unit of
the Innoko National Wildlife Refuge is
E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM
14MYN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 14, 2008 / Notices
available for public comment. The Draft
CCP/EA was prepared pursuant to the
Alaska National Interest Lands
Conservation Act of 1980 (ANILCA), the
National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966 (Refuge
Administration Act) as amended by the
National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (Refuge
Improvement Act), and the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA). It describes two alternatives for
managing the southern unit of the
Innoko Refuge for the next 15 years,
including continuing current
management. We will use special
mailings to inform the public of
opportunities to provide input on the
CCP/EA and will hold public meetings
in communities near the Refuge
(Grayling, Anvik, Shageluk, Holly Cross,
Kaltag, McGrath, and Takotna).
DATES: Comments on the Draft CCP/EA
must be received on or before July 22,
2008.
ADDRESSES: To provide written
comments or to request a paper copy or
a compact disk of the Draft CCP/EA,
contact Rob Campellone, Planning Team
Leader, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
1011 East Tudor Rd., MS–231,
Anchorage, Alaska 99503; telephone:
(907) 786–3982; fax: (907) 786–3965; email: fw7_innoko_planning@fws.gov.
You may also view or download a copy
of the Draft CCP/EA at the following
Web site: https://alaska.fws.gov/nwr/
planning/innpol.htm. Copies of the
Draft CCP/EA may be viewed at the
Innoko Refuge Office in McGrath,
Alaska, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service Regional Office in Anchorage,
Alaska.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rob
Campellone at the address or phone
number provided above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
ANILCA (16 U.S.C. 410hh et seq., 43
U.S.C. 1602 et seq.) requires
development of a CCP for all national
wildlife refuges in Alaska. The Draft
CCP/EA for the southern unit of the
Innoko Refuge was developed consistent
with Section 304(g) of ANILCA and the
Refuge Administration Act as amended
by the Refuge Improvement Act (16
U.S.C. 668dd et seq.). The purpose of
developing CCPs is to provide refuge
managers with a 15-year management
strategy for achieving refuge purposes
and contributing toward the mission of
the National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish,
wildlife, and habitat management and
conservation; legal mandates; and
Service policies. Plans define long-term
goals and objectives toward which
refuge management activities are
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:39 May 13, 2008
Jkt 214001
directed and identify which uses may be
compatible with the purposes of the
refuge. They identify wildlifedependent recreation opportunities
available to the public, including
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation
and photography, and environmental
education and interpretation.
Comprehensive conservation plans are
updated in accordance with planning
direction in Section 304(g) of ANILCA
and with NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
Background: In 1980, ANILCA
designated the Innoko National Wildlife
Refuge. Refuge boundaries encompass
approximately 3.8 million acres of
which approximately 3.5 million acres
(92 percent) are under Service
jurisdiction. Section 302(3)(B) of
ANILCA states that the purposes for
which Innoko Refuge was established
include: (i) To conserve fish and
wildlife populations and habitats in
their natural diversity; (ii) to fulfill
international treaty obligations of the
United States with respect to fish and
wildlife and their habitats; (iii) to
provide the opportunity for continued
subsistence use by local residents; and
(iv) to ensure water quality and
necessary water quantity within the
refuge. A CCP and Environmental
Impact Statement were completed for
the Innoko Refuge in 1987 following
direction in Section 304(g) of ANILCA.
The ANILCA requires us to designate
areas according to their respective
resources and values and to specify
programs and uses within the areas
designated. To meet this requirement,
the Alaska Region established
management categories (wilderness,
minimal, moderate, intensive, and wild
river). Appropriate activities, public
uses, commercial uses, and facilities are
identified for each management
category. Two management categories
(wilderness and minimal) apply to the
southern unit of the Innoko Refuge.
The 1997 Refuge Improvement Act
includes additional direction for
conservation planning throughout the
National Wildlife Refuge System. This
direction has been incorporated into
national planning policy for the
National Wildlife Refuge System,
including refuges in Alaska. This draft
revision of the Innoko CCP/EA meets
the requirements of both ANILCA and
the Refuge Administration Act as
amended by the Refuge Improvement
Act.
Issues raised during scoping and
addressed in the Draft CCP/EA are (1)
Competition for moose harvesting; (2)
management of air taxis to balance
demand for visitor access with user
experience and resource protection; (3)
threats to water quality from off-refuge
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27843
mining; (4) refuge enhancement of its
relationship with local communities; (5)
monitoring and addressing the effects of
climate change; (6) the proposed
reintroduction of wood bison by the
Alaska Department of Fish and Game;
and (7) ensuring resource protection
while providing for subsistence and
other public uses.
The Draft CCP/EA describes and
evaluates two alternatives for managing
the southern unit of the Innoko Refuge
for the next 15 years. These alternatives
follow much of the same general
management direction. Alternative A
(the No-Action Alternative) is required
under NEPA and describes continuation
of current management activities.
Alternative A serves as a baseline
against which to compare the other
alternative. Under Alternative A,
management of the southern unit of the
Innoko Refuge would continue to follow
direction described in the 1987 CCP and
record of decision as modified by
subsequent program-specific plans (e.g.,
fisheries, cultural resources, fire
management plans). Currently 61
percent of the refuge is in minimal
management, 34.5 percent is designated
as Wilderness, and 4.5 percent is in
private ownership. Alternative A would
continue to protect and maintain the
existing wildlife values, natural
diversity, and ecological integrity of the
refuge. Human disturbances to fish and
wildlife habitats and populations would
be minimal. Private and commercial
uses of the refuge would not change,
and public uses employing existing
access methods would continue to be
allowed. Opportunities to pursue
traditional subsistence activities, and
recreational hunting, fishing, and other
wildlife dependent activities, would be
maintained. Opportunities to pursue
research would be maintained.
Alternative B (the Proposed Action)
would generally continue to follow
management direction described in the
1987 CCP and record of decision as
modified by subsequent programspecific plans, but some of that
management direction has been updated
by changes in policy since the 1987
Innoko Refuge CCP was approved.
Alternative B identifies these specific
changes in management direction as
well as goals and objectives for refuge
management.
Public Availability of Comments:
Before including your name, address,
phone number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM
14MYN1
27844
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 14, 2008 / Notices
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. We will make all comments from
individual persons part of the official
public record. We will handle requests
for such comments in accordance with
the Freedom of Information Act, NEPA,
and Departmental policies and
procedures.
Dated: May 8, 2008.
Thomas O. Melius,
Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Anchorage, Alaska.
[FR Doc. E8–10810 Filed 5–13–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[AZ–200–07–5320–PH–1000–241A]
Notice of Temporary Route Closure,
Sonoran Desert National Monument,
AZ
AGENCY:
Bureau of Land Management,
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Interior.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
intends to temporarily close 88 miles of
un-maintained, dirt-surfaced vehicle
routes in the Sonoran Desert National
Monument (SDNM), and one mile on
the adjacent public lands managed by
the Lower Sonoran Field Office to all
travel by motor vehicles. A map of this
closure area, documentation of
categorical exclusion of this action from
further review under provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), and the administrative decision
can be viewed online at https://
www.blm.gov/az/sonoran/
sondes_main.htm.
DATES: The closure will be in effect
beginning thirty (30) calendar days from
publication of this notice and will
remain in effect until off-highwayvehicle (OHV) damage to the natural
and cultural resources of SDNM has
been restored to the extent possible and
when adequate measures have been
implemented to prevent recurrence of
such damage. A staged re-opening of the
vehicle routes is expected to begin with
in two to three years from the time that
the temporary route closure goes into
effect, depending on the availability of
resources to complete the restoration
and management actions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Manager, Sonoran Desert National
Monument, Bureau of Land
Management, Phoenix District, 21065
North 7th Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona
85027; 623–580–5500.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:39 May 13, 2008
Jkt 214001
Since its
establishment, certain parts of SDNM
have experienced increased visitation
from growing adjacent communities,
which in turn has increased the public
awareness and popularity of these areas
for OHV use. Motorized vehicle use offroad has led to visible and persistent
damage to the soils and vegetation of
lands adjacent to primary access routes,
to degradation of the natural and
cultural resource objects for which the
monument was designated—including a
portion of the Juan Bautista de Anza
National Historic Trail—and to
degradation of the scenic values of the
monument. The temporary route closure
will prevent further damage to the
natural resources of SDNM by
unauthorized and illegal OHV use. The
BLM is currently in the process of
developing a management plan for
restoring damaged areas and managing
future use of this area. Development of
the plan will include public
involvement and will be completed in
summer 2008. The restoration and
management plan could identify
specific actions to include visitor entry/
information points, site, road, and
information signing, camping and
staging site delineation, and road repair.
During the period of closure, primary
access routes will be restored and
adjacent areas of OHV damage—
including vehicle tracks, barren cores
areas, and other areas of human
disturbance—will be reclaimed to the
extent possible by hand raking, vertical
mulching, harrowing, and seeding
(native plants only). Further, the
temporary closure of these routes will
assure that the reclamation work will
not be damaged or outpaced by ongoing
improper OHV use and will provide for
the health and safety of BLM staff and
volunteers engaged in this work by
reducing exposure to the high volumes
of dust generated by the passage of
vehicles. In evaluating when to re-open
areas or routes within the temporary
closure area, we will consider the
following factors: (a) Physical
rehabilitation of the damaged areas is
substantially completed (rehabilitation
is the physical obliteration of vehicle
damage, and includes vertical mulching,
such that vehicle tracks are not visible
to be driven on and the area is prepared
for natural re-vegetation. Physical
rehabilitation does not include
vegetation restoration and recovery,
which will occur over a much longer
time period); (b) The major components
of the management plan for that area or
route have been implemented to effect
a change in user behavior and ensure
the resource damage does not re-occur;
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(c) The practicality of re-opening an area
or route(s) while maintaining the
temporary closure where the
rehabilitation and management actions
are not yet completed. Prior to and
during the closure, primary vehicle
access points will be blocked to use by
vehicles with wire fencing and will be
posted with signs and public
information displays advising of the
purpose of the closure and of the
reclamation project. All other vehicle
access points will be prominently
posted with a closure order and map.
The closure will restrict public access
to portions of T. 3 S., R. 1 W., section
30; T. 3 S., R. 2 W., sections 9–11, 13–
15, 24–26, 35, and 36; T. 4 S., R. 1 W.,
sections 2, 3, 10–12, 13–15, 19–24, 26–
28, 34, and 35; T. 4 S., R. 2 W., sections
2, 10, 11, 15, 16, 22–24, 25–29, 31–33,
and 35; T. 4 S., R. 3 W., section 34; T.
5 S., R. 2 W., sections 2, 3, 6, 7, 11, and
12; and T. 5 S., R. 3 W., sections 1–4,
9–15, and 23 (Gila and Salt River
Meridian). A map of this closure area,
documentation of categorical exclusion
of this action from further review under
provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and
the administrative decision can be
viewed online at https://www.blm.gov/
az/sonoran/sondes_main.htm. These
materials are also available at the BLM
Phoenix District Office. The following
persons, operating within the scope of
their official duties, are exempt from the
provisions of this closure: employees of
BLM, Arizona Game and Fish
Department, and local and Federal law
enforcement and fire protection
personnel. Access by additional parties
may be allowed, but must be approved
in advance in writing by the authorized
manager.
This closure is in accordance with the
provisions of Presidential Proclamation
7397, 66 FR 7354 (Jan. 22, 2001); 43 CFR
8341.2(a); and 43 CFR 8364.1. On all
public lands, under section 303(a) of the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act of 1976 (FLPMA), 43 U.S.C. 1733(a),
43 CFR 8360.0–7, any person who
violates any closures or restrictions on
public lands as announced in this order
may be tried before a United States
Magistrate and fined no more than
$1000.00 or imprisoned for not more
than 12 months, or both. Such
violations may also be subject to
enhanced fines provided for by 18
U.S.C. 3571 (not to exceed $100,000.00
and/or imprisonment not to exceed 12
months).
E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM
14MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 14, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27842-27844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10810]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Innoko National Wildlife Refuge, McGrath, AK
AGENCY: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Availability of the Draft Revised Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment for Innoko National
Wildlife Refuge; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service, we), announce
that the Draft Revised Comprehensive Conservation Plan (Draft CCP) and
Environmental Assessment (EA) for the southern unit of the Innoko
National Wildlife Refuge is
[[Page 27843]]
available for public comment. The Draft CCP/EA was prepared pursuant to
the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act of 1980 (ANILCA),
the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (Refuge
Administration Act) as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (Refuge Improvement Act), and the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). It describes two alternatives
for managing the southern unit of the Innoko Refuge for the next 15
years, including continuing current management. We will use special
mailings to inform the public of opportunities to provide input on the
CCP/EA and will hold public meetings in communities near the Refuge
(Grayling, Anvik, Shageluk, Holly Cross, Kaltag, McGrath, and Takotna).
DATES: Comments on the Draft CCP/EA must be received on or before July
22, 2008.
ADDRESSES: To provide written comments or to request a paper copy or a
compact disk of the Draft CCP/EA, contact Rob Campellone, Planning Team
Leader, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1011 East Tudor Rd., MS-231,
Anchorage, Alaska 99503; telephone: (907) 786-3982; fax: (907) 786-
3965; e-mail: fw7_innoko_planning@fws.gov. You may also view or
download a copy of the Draft CCP/EA at the following Web site: https://
alaska.fws.gov/nwr/planning/innpol.htm. Copies of the Draft CCP/EA may
be viewed at the Innoko Refuge Office in McGrath, Alaska, and the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service Regional Office in Anchorage, Alaska.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rob Campellone at the address or phone
number provided above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The ANILCA (16 U.S.C. 410hh et seq., 43
U.S.C. 1602 et seq.) requires development of a CCP for all national
wildlife refuges in Alaska. The Draft CCP/EA for the southern unit of
the Innoko Refuge was developed consistent with Section 304(g) of
ANILCA and the Refuge Administration Act as amended by the Refuge
Improvement Act (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.). The purpose of developing
CCPs is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year management strategy
for achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of
the National Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound principles
of fish, wildlife, and habitat management and conservation; legal
mandates; and Service policies. Plans define long-term goals and
objectives toward which refuge management activities are directed and
identify which uses may be compatible with the purposes of the refuge.
They identify wildlife-dependent recreation opportunities available to
the public, including hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and
photography, and environmental education and interpretation.
Comprehensive conservation plans are updated in accordance with
planning direction in Section 304(g) of ANILCA and with NEPA (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.).
Background: In 1980, ANILCA designated the Innoko National Wildlife
Refuge. Refuge boundaries encompass approximately 3.8 million acres of
which approximately 3.5 million acres (92 percent) are under Service
jurisdiction. Section 302(3)(B) of ANILCA states that the purposes for
which Innoko Refuge was established include: (i) To conserve fish and
wildlife populations and habitats in their natural diversity; (ii) to
fulfill international treaty obligations of the United States with
respect to fish and wildlife and their habitats; (iii) to provide the
opportunity for continued subsistence use by local residents; and (iv)
to ensure water quality and necessary water quantity within the refuge.
A CCP and Environmental Impact Statement were completed for the Innoko
Refuge in 1987 following direction in Section 304(g) of ANILCA.
The ANILCA requires us to designate areas according to their
respective resources and values and to specify programs and uses within
the areas designated. To meet this requirement, the Alaska Region
established management categories (wilderness, minimal, moderate,
intensive, and wild river). Appropriate activities, public uses,
commercial uses, and facilities are identified for each management
category. Two management categories (wilderness and minimal) apply to
the southern unit of the Innoko Refuge.
The 1997 Refuge Improvement Act includes additional direction for
conservation planning throughout the National Wildlife Refuge System.
This direction has been incorporated into national planning policy for
the National Wildlife Refuge System, including refuges in Alaska. This
draft revision of the Innoko CCP/EA meets the requirements of both
ANILCA and the Refuge Administration Act as amended by the Refuge
Improvement Act.
Issues raised during scoping and addressed in the Draft CCP/EA are
(1) Competition for moose harvesting; (2) management of air taxis to
balance demand for visitor access with user experience and resource
protection; (3) threats to water quality from off-refuge mining; (4)
refuge enhancement of its relationship with local communities; (5)
monitoring and addressing the effects of climate change; (6) the
proposed reintroduction of wood bison by the Alaska Department of Fish
and Game; and (7) ensuring resource protection while providing for
subsistence and other public uses.
The Draft CCP/EA describes and evaluates two alternatives for
managing the southern unit of the Innoko Refuge for the next 15 years.
These alternatives follow much of the same general management
direction. Alternative A (the No-Action Alternative) is required under
NEPA and describes continuation of current management activities.
Alternative A serves as a baseline against which to compare the other
alternative. Under Alternative A, management of the southern unit of
the Innoko Refuge would continue to follow direction described in the
1987 CCP and record of decision as modified by subsequent program-
specific plans (e.g., fisheries, cultural resources, fire management
plans). Currently 61 percent of the refuge is in minimal management,
34.5 percent is designated as Wilderness, and 4.5 percent is in private
ownership. Alternative A would continue to protect and maintain the
existing wildlife values, natural diversity, and ecological integrity
of the refuge. Human disturbances to fish and wildlife habitats and
populations would be minimal. Private and commercial uses of the refuge
would not change, and public uses employing existing access methods
would continue to be allowed. Opportunities to pursue traditional
subsistence activities, and recreational hunting, fishing, and other
wildlife dependent activities, would be maintained. Opportunities to
pursue research would be maintained. Alternative B (the Proposed
Action) would generally continue to follow management direction
described in the 1987 CCP and record of decision as modified by
subsequent program-specific plans, but some of that management
direction has been updated by changes in policy since the 1987 Innoko
Refuge CCP was approved. Alternative B identifies these specific
changes in management direction as well as goals and objectives for
refuge management.
Public Availability of Comments: Before including your name,
address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire
comment--including your personal identifying information--may be made
publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment
[[Page 27844]]
to withhold your personal identifying information from public review,
we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. We will make all
comments from individual persons part of the official public record. We
will handle requests for such comments in accordance with the Freedom
of Information Act, NEPA, and Departmental policies and procedures.
Dated: May 8, 2008.
Thomas O. Melius,
Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska.
[FR Doc. E8-10810 Filed 5-13-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P