Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; AVASTIN, 27836-27837 [E8-10726]
Download as PDF
27836
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 14, 2008 / Notices
registration will include the details
needed to participate in the web
meeting. Non-US citizens are
encouraged to participate in the web
meeting. Non-US citizens registering to
attend in person after June 2 will not
have time to comply with security
procedures.
Background: NORA is a partnership
program to stimulate innovative
research in occupational safety and
health leading to improved workplace
practices. Unveiled in 1996, NORA has
become a research framework for the
nation. Diverse parties collaborate to
identify the most critical issues in
workplace safety and health. Partners
then work together to develop goals and
objectives for addressing those needs
and to move the research results into
practice. The NIOSH role is facilitator of
the process. For more information about
NORA, see https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/
nora/about.html.
Since 2006, NORA has been
structured by industrial sectors. Eight
sector groups have been defined using
the North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS). After
receiving public input through the web
and town hall meetings, NORA Sector
Councils have been working to define
sector-specific strategic plans for
conducting research and moving the
results into widespread practice. During
2008, most of these Councils will post
draft strategic plans for public comment.
For more information, see the link above
and choose ‘‘Sector-based Approach,’’
‘‘NORA Sector Councils’’ and
‘‘Comment on Draft Sector Agendas’’
from the right-side menu.
Contact Person for Technical
Information: Sidney C. Soderholm, PhD,
NORA Coordinator, e-mail
noracoordinator@cdc.gov, telephone
(202) 245–0665.
Dated: May 5, 2008.
James D. Seligman,
Chief Information Officer, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E8–10753 Filed 5–13–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–19–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Delegation of Authority
Notice is hereby given that I have
redelegated to Charles N.W. Keckler,
Esq., Senior Advisor, Immediate Office
of the Assistant Secretary,
Administration for Children and
Families (ACF), the following authority
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:39 May 13, 2008
Jkt 214001
vested in the Assistant Secretary for
Children and Families.
(a) Authority Delegated.
Authority to review and make
decisions to approve or disapprove
requests for testimony by ACF
employees or former ACF employees
concerning information acquired in the
course of performing official duties or
because of such persons’ official
capacity with the Department of Health
and Human Services in proceedings
where the United States is not a party.
(b) Limitations and Conditions.
This redelegation may not be further
redelegated.
(c) Effect on Existing Delegations.
None.
(d) Effective date.
This redelegation is effective on the
date of signature. I hereby affirm and
ratify any actions taken by Mr. Charles
Keckler which, in effect, involved the
exercise of this authority prior to the
effective date of this redelegation.
Dated: May 2, 2008.
Daniel C. Schneider,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Children and
Families.
[FR Doc. E8–10766 Filed 5–13–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2007–E–0102] (formerly
Docket No. 2007E–0184)
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; AVASTIN
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
AVASTIN and is publishing this notice
of that determination as required by
law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an
application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of
Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that human biological
product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written or electronic
comments and petitions to the Division
of Dockets Management (HFA–305),
Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD
20852. Submit electronic comments to
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002, 301–796–3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human
biological products, the testing phase
begins when the exemption to permit
the clinical investigations of the
biological becomes effective and runs
until the approval phase begins. The
approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market
the human biological product and
continues until FDA grants permission
to market the biological product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory
review period may count toward the
actual amount of extension that the
Director of Patents and Trademarks may
award (for example, half the testing
phase must be subtracted as well as any
time that may have occurred before the
patent was issued), FDA’s determination
of the length of a regulatory review
period for a human biological product
will include all of the testing phase and
approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(1)(B).
FDA approved for marketing the
human biologic product AVASTIN
(bevacizumab). AVASTIN, used in
combination with intravenous 5fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, is
indicated for first-line treatment of
patients with metastatic carcinoma of
the colon or rectum. Subsequent to this
approval, the Patent and Trademark
Office received a patent term restoration
application for AVASTIN (U.S. Patent
No. 6,639,055) from Genentech, Inc.,
and the Patent and Trademark Office
requested FDA’s assistance in
determining this patent’s eligibility for
patent term restoration. In a letter dated
July 24, 2007, FDA advised the Patent
and Trademark Office that this human
biological product had undergone a
regulatory review period and that the
approval of AVASTIN represented the
E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM
14MYN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 14, 2008 / Notices
first permitted commercial marketing or
use of the product. Thereafter, the
Patent and Trademark Office requested
that FDA determine the product’s
regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
AVASTIN is 2,551 days. Of this time,
2,401 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 150 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i))
became effective: March 5, 1997. The
applicant claims February 3, 1997, as
the date the investigational new drug
application (IND) became effective.
However, FDA records indicate that the
IND effective date was March 5, 1997,
which was 30 days after FDA receipt of
the IND.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human biological product under section
351 of the Public Health Service Act (42
U.S.C. 262): September 30, 2003. The
applicant claims August 29, 2003, as the
date the biologics license application
(BLA) for AVASTIN (BLA 125085/0)
was initially submitted. The applicant
claims this is the date it submitted the
first unit of BLA 125085/0, which was
submitted in several units as part of a
rolling application procedure. It is
FDA’s position that the approval phase
begins when the marketing application
is complete. A review of FDA records
reveals that the final module of the BLA
125085/0 was submitted on September
30, 2003, which is considered to be the
date the complete marketing application
was initially submitted.
3. The date the application was
approved: February 26, 2004. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that BLA
125085/0 was approved on February 26,
2004.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 121 days of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by July 14, 2008.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:39 May 13, 2008
Jkt 214001
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
November 10, 2008. To meet its burden,
the petition must contain sufficient facts
to merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. Comments and petitions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Please note that on January 15, 2008,
the FDA Web site transitioned to the
Federal Dockets Management System
(FDMS). FDMS is a Government-wide,
electronic docket management system.
Electronic submissions will be accepted
by FDA through FDMS only.
Dated: April 28, 2008.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E8–10726 Filed 5–13–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2007–E–0399] (formerly
Docket No. 2007E–0145)
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; INVEGA
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
INVEGA and is publishing this notice of
that determination as required by law.
FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an
application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of
Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27837
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002, 301–796–3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human drug
products, the testing phase begins when
the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the human drug
product becomes effective and runs
until the approval phase begins. The
approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market
the human drug product and continues
until FDA grants permission to market
the drug product. Although only a
portion of a regulatory review period
may count toward the actual amount of
extension that the Director of Patents
and Trademarks may award (for
example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may
have occurred before the patent was
issued), FDA’s determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
a human drug product will include all
of the testing phase and approval phase
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the human drug product INVEGA
(paliperidone). INVEGA is indicated for
the treatment of schizophrenia.
Subsequent to this approval, the Patent
and Trademark Office received a patent
term restoration application for INVEGA
(U.S. Patent No. 5,158,952) from
Janssen, L.P., and the Patent and
Trademark Office requested FDA’s
assistance in determining this patent’s
eligibility for patent term restoration. In
a letter dated July 23, 2007, FDA
advised the Patent and Trademark
Office that this human drug product had
undergone a regulatory review period
and that the approval of INVEGA
represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the
product. Thereafter, the Patent and
E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM
14MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 14, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27836-27837]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10726]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2007-E-0102] (formerly Docket No. 2007E-0184)
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; AVASTIN
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for AVASTIN and is publishing this notice of
that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that human biological product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written or electronic comments and petitions to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic
comments to https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
51, rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 100-670) generally provide
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For human biological products, the
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the biological becomes effective and runs until the
approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market the human biological product and
continues until FDA grants permission to market the biological product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward
the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent
was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory review
period for a human biological product will include all of the testing
phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA approved for marketing the human biologic product AVASTIN
(bevacizumab). AVASTIN, used in combination with intravenous 5-
fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, is indicated for first-line treatment
of patients with metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum.
Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and Trademark Office received a
patent term restoration application for AVASTIN (U.S. Patent No.
6,639,055) from Genentech, Inc., and the Patent and Trademark Office
requested FDA's assistance in determining this patent's eligibility for
patent term restoration. In a letter dated July 24, 2007, FDA advised
the Patent and Trademark Office that this human biological product had
undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval of AVASTIN
represented the
[[Page 27837]]
first permitted commercial marketing or use of the product. Thereafter,
the Patent and Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the
product's regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
AVASTIN is 2,551 days. Of this time, 2,401 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 150 days occurred
during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective: March 5,
1997. The applicant claims February 3, 1997, as the date the
investigational new drug application (IND) became effective. However,
FDA records indicate that the IND effective date was March 5, 1997,
which was 30 days after FDA receipt of the IND.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the human biological product under section 351 of the Public Health
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262): September 30, 2003. The applicant claims
August 29, 2003, as the date the biologics license application (BLA)
for AVASTIN (BLA 125085/0) was initially submitted. The applicant
claims this is the date it submitted the first unit of BLA 125085/0,
which was submitted in several units as part of a rolling application
procedure. It is FDA's position that the approval phase begins when the
marketing application is complete. A review of FDA records reveals that
the final module of the BLA 125085/0 was submitted on September 30,
2003, which is considered to be the date the complete marketing
application was initially submitted.
3. The date the application was approved: February 26, 2004. FDA
has verified the applicant's claim that BLA 125085/0 was approved on
February 26, 2004.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its
application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 121 days of
patent term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments and ask for a redetermination
by July 14, 2008. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA
for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted
with due diligence during the regulatory review period by November 10,
2008. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient facts to
merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d
sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in
21 CFR 10.30. Comments and petitions should be submitted to the
Division of Dockets Management. Three copies of any mailed information
are to be submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy.
Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets
in the heading of this document. Comments and petitions may be seen in
the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
Please note that on January 15, 2008, the FDA Web site
transitioned to the Federal Dockets Management System (FDMS). FDMS is a
Government-wide, electronic docket management system. Electronic
submissions will be accepted by FDA through FDMS only.
Dated: April 28, 2008.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E8-10726 Filed 5-13-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S