Pilot Program to Evaluate Proposed Name Submissions; Concept Paper; Public Meeting, 27001-27002 [E8-10513]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 92 / Monday, May 12, 2008 / Notices
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,122 days of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by July 11, 2008.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
November 10, 2008. To meet its burden,
the petition must contain sufficient facts
to merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. Comments and petitions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Please note that on January 15, 2008,
the FDA Web site transitioned to the
Federal Dockets Management System
(FDMS). FDMS is a Government-wide,
electronic docket management system.
Electronic submissions will be accepted
by FDA through FDMS only.
Dated: April 28, 2008.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E8–10512 Filed 5–9–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2008–N–0281]
Pilot Program to Evaluate Proposed
Name Submissions; Concept Paper;
Public Meeting
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Notice of public meeting;
request for comments.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (CDER) and the
Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research (CBER) of the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) are announcing a
public technical meeting in preparation
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:54 May 09, 2008
Jkt 214001
for a pilot program to enable
pharmaceutical firms to evaluate
proposed propriety names and submit
the data generated from those
evaluations to FDA for review. The
purpose of the public technical meeting
is to discuss a concept paper that
describes the logistics of the pilot
program, proposed recommendations
for carrying out a proprietary name
review, and the way FDA intends to
review submissions made under the
pilot program. FDA plans to formally
issue the concept paper by the end of
fiscal year (FY) 2008 and expects to
begin enrollment in the pilot program in
FY 2009.
DATES: The public meeting will be held
on June 5 and 6, 2008, from 8:30 a.m.
to 5 p.m. each day. Register to make a
presentation at the meeting by May 23,
2008. See section III of this document
for information on how to attend or
present at the meeting. Submit any
written or electronic comments
regarding the concept paper and pilot
program by July 7, 2008.
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be
held at the Crowne Plaza Hotel, 877
Georgia Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20910
(Metro: Silver Spring Station on the Red
Line). Submit written or electronic
requests to make a presentation at the
meeting to Lana Pauls (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT). A draft concept
paper will be available soon.
Comment Submissions: Submit
written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lana Pauls, Center for Drug Evaluation
and Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 6196, Silver Spring,
MD 20993, 301–796–0518, FAX: 301–
847–8753, e-mail:
lana.pauls@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) in its
2006 report ‘‘Preventing Medication
Errors’’ noted that ‘‘[i]n particular, drug
names that look or sound alike increase
the risk of medication errors.’’ FDA also
has determined that many of the
medication errors reported to the agency
result from proprietary names that look
or sound like the names of other
medical products. Reducing the
potential for medication errors due to
proprietary name confusion is part of
FDA’s ongoing medical product risk
management effort. In 2003, FDA held
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27001
two public meetings that explored many
of the issues involved in proprietary
name review:
• The June 26, 2003, public meeting
on ‘‘Minimizing Medication Errors—
Methods for Evaluating Proprietary
Names for Their Confusion Potential,’’
Docket No. 2002N–0201 (68 FR 32529,
May 30, 2003). Information about the
meeting is available at https://
www.fda.gov/cder/meeting/
drugNaming.htm.
• The December 4, 2003, meeting of
the Drug Safety and Risk Management
Advisory Committee (68 FR 65075,
November 18, 2003). Transcripts,
presentations, and materials from the
meeting are available at https://
www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/
cder03.html#DrugSafetyRisk
Management.
FDA reviews proprietary names from
both promotional and safety
perspectives. The promotional review of
proposed names considers whether the
name functions to overstate the efficacy,
minimize the risk, broaden the
indication, make unsubstantiated
superiority claims for the product, or is
overly fanciful. The safety review of a
proposed name is based on the findings
of a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
of the proprietary name, and is focused
on the avoidance of medical errors. FDA
not only considers the potential for a
name to be spelled similarly and/or
sound similar to a currently marketed
product or one that is in the approval
pipeline, but also considers the
potential for the proposed name to
inadvertently function as a source of
error for reasons other than look and
sound-alike name confusion, for
instance whether the abbreviation for
the drug would be similar to the
abbreviation of another drug product.
Consideration also is given to the
proposed product’s characteristics
including its intended use, dosage form
and strength, and route of
administration, because the product
characteristics provide a context for
communication of the product name
and ultimately determine the use of the
product in the usual clinical practice
setting. In addition, because productname confusion can occur at any point
in the medication use process, FDA
considers the potential for confusion
throughout the process, including
product procurement, prescribing and
ordering, dispensing, administration,
and monitoring the impact of the
medication.
Currently, the data generated to access
this information is internal to FDA.
However, there have been a number of
calls for industry to become involved in
the name testing process including
E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM
12MYN1
27002
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 92 / Monday, May 12, 2008 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
IOM’s 2006 report, IOM’s 1999 report
‘‘To Err is Human,’’ Recommendation
#238 from the HHS Advisory Committee
on Regulatory Reform’s November 21,
2002 report, and, most recently, in the
Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA
IV) performance goals.
In Title I of the Food and Drug
Administration Amendments Act of
2007 (FDAAA) (Public Law 110–85),
Congress reauthorized and expanded
the Prescription Drug User Fee program
for FY 2008 through FY 2012 (PDUFA
IV). As part of the performance goals
and procedures set forth in an enclosure
to the letter from the Secretary of the
Health and Human Services referred to
in section 101(c) of FDAAA, FDA agreed
to publish a concept paper on and
implement a pilot program to enable
pharmaceutical firms participating in
the pilot to evaluate proposed
proprietary names and submit the data
generated from those evaluations to
FDA for review. This process is
consistent with other areas of drug
review in which FDA evaluates data
generated by firms rather than
producing such data independently.
FDA intends the concept paper to
provide transparency to the FDA review
processes, as well as to provide a
consistent, scientific approach to the
review of proprietary names data. FDA
agreed to conduct a public meeting to
discuss the content of the concept
paper, which will describe the logistics
of the pilot program, proposed
recommendations for carrying out a
proprietary name review, and the way
FDA intends to review submissions
made under the pilot program. FDA is
developing the concept paper, which
contains its current thinking on the
logistics of the pilot and name testing
and evaluation under the pilot. The
concept paper will be available at the
Division of Dockets Management and on
the Internet prior to the meeting (see
ADDRESSES). FDA welcomes written and
electronic comments on the draft
concept paper before and after the
public meeting (see section IV of this
document).
II. Scope of Public Meeting
At the public meeting, FDA will
present its current thinking on
proprietary name review testing and the
proposed pilot program, and will solicit
feedback from industry, patient safety
groups, academics, health care
professionals, other governmental
agencies, and the public. The meeting
will include panel discussions and
individual and/or joint presentations.
Some of the key questions that will be
considered at the meeting include, but
are not limited to, the following:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:54 May 09, 2008
Jkt 214001
1. What are best practices in safety
and promotional testing of proprietary
names? What are the limitations of
current methods and how may they be
overcome?
2. What combination of tests should
be undertaken and what data should be
submitted by sponsors participating in
the pilot? Discussion of testing
procedures should focus on advances in
the field of name testing since the 2003
public meetings (e.g., improvements in
test design, accuracy, and validation, as
well as use of practitioner input in the
range of clinical settings in which drugs
are procured, prescribed, prepared/
dispensed, administered, and
monitored).
3. How should testing be standardized
to achieve valid, reliable results across
studies?
4. What criteria should FDA consider
in evaluating the testing done and the
data submitted?
5. How should the pilot program be
structured and evaluated?
6. Are there any public health
concerns raised by the pilot program
and how should they be addressed?
Speakers who wish to present
material in the public meeting must
register before the meeting (see section
III of this document). Time will be
allowed for questions and answers after
each panel discussion.
Information gathered from the
meeting and from comments submitted
to the docket will be used to develop the
final concept paper. FDA intends to
publish the final concept paper by the
end of FY 2008 and expects to begin
enrollment in the pilot in FY 2009.
III. Attendance and Registration
There is no fee to attend the meeting,
and attendees who do not wish to make
an oral presentation do not need to
register. Seating will be on a first-come,
first-served basis.
If you would like to make an oral
presentation during the meeting, you
must register and provide an abstract of
your presentation by close of business
on May 23, 2008. You must provide
your name, title, business affiliation (if
applicable), address, telephone and fax
numbers, and e-mail address to Lana
Pauls (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT). You should identify the topic
or section of the draft concept paper you
wish to address in your presentation,
whether you wish to address comments
on day one or day two, and the
approximate time requested for your
presentation. FDA has identified topics
of special interest in section II of this
document and is posting a draft concept
paper and agenda on the Internet (see
ADDRESSES). The Centers may change
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the time allotted depending on the
number of people requesting to present.
Individuals and organizations with
common interests are urged to
consolidate or coordinate their
presentations and to request time for a
joint presentation. Persons registered to
make an oral presentation should check
in before the meeting. If you need
special accommodations because of
disability, please contact Lana Pauls
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT)
at least 7 days before the meeting.
IV. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic
comments regarding issues and
questions presented in the concept
paper or at the meeting. Submit a single
copy of electronic comments or two
paper copies of any mailed comments,
except that individuals may submit one
paper copy. Comments are to be
identified with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this
document. Received comments may be
seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Please note that on January 15, 2008,
the FDA Division of Dockets
Management Web site transitioned to
the Federal Dockets Management
System (FDMS). FDMS is a
Government-wide, electronic docket
management system. Electronic
comments or submissions will be
accepted by FDA only through FDMS at
https://www.regulations.gov.
V. Transcripts
Please be advised that as soon as a
transcript is available, it will be
accessible at https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/
dockets/ac/acmenu.htm. It may be
viewed at the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD. A transcript will
also be available in either hardcopy or
on CD–ROM, after submission of a
Freedom of Information request. Written
requests are to be sent to Division of
Freedom of Information (HFI–35), Office
of Management Programs, Food and
Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers
Lane, rm. 6–30, Rockville, MD 20857.
Dated: May 6, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E8–10513 Filed 5–9–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM
12MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 92 (Monday, May 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27001-27002]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10513]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0281]
Pilot Program to Evaluate Proposed Name Submissions; Concept
Paper; Public Meeting
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) and the
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) of the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) are announcing a public technical meeting in
preparation for a pilot program to enable pharmaceutical firms to
evaluate proposed propriety names and submit the data generated from
those evaluations to FDA for review. The purpose of the public
technical meeting is to discuss a concept paper that describes the
logistics of the pilot program, proposed recommendations for carrying
out a proprietary name review, and the way FDA intends to review
submissions made under the pilot program. FDA plans to formally issue
the concept paper by the end of fiscal year (FY) 2008 and expects to
begin enrollment in the pilot program in FY 2009.
DATES: The public meeting will be held on June 5 and 6, 2008, from
8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. each day. Register to make a presentation at the
meeting by May 23, 2008. See section III of this document for
information on how to attend or present at the meeting. Submit any
written or electronic comments regarding the concept paper and pilot
program by July 7, 2008.
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be held at the Crowne Plaza Hotel,
877 Georgia Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20910 (Metro: Silver Spring Station
on the Red Line). Submit written or electronic requests to make a
presentation at the meeting to Lana Pauls (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT). A draft concept paper will be available soon.
Comment Submissions: Submit written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments
to https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lana Pauls, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 6196, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-
0518, FAX: 301-847-8753, e-mail: lana.pauls@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) in its 2006 report ``Preventing
Medication Errors'' noted that ``[i]n particular, drug names that look
or sound alike increase the risk of medication errors.'' FDA also has
determined that many of the medication errors reported to the agency
result from proprietary names that look or sound like the names of
other medical products. Reducing the potential for medication errors
due to proprietary name confusion is part of FDA's ongoing medical
product risk management effort. In 2003, FDA held two public meetings
that explored many of the issues involved in proprietary name review:
The June 26, 2003, public meeting on ``Minimizing
Medication Errors--Methods for Evaluating Proprietary Names for Their
Confusion Potential,'' Docket No. 2002N-0201 (68 FR 32529, May 30,
2003). Information about the meeting is available at https://
www.fda.gov/cder/meeting/drugNaming.htm.
The December 4, 2003, meeting of the Drug Safety and Risk
Management Advisory Committee (68 FR 65075, November 18, 2003).
Transcripts, presentations, and materials from the meeting are
available at https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/
cder03.html#DrugSafetyRiskManagement.
FDA reviews proprietary names from both promotional and safety
perspectives. The promotional review of proposed names considers
whether the name functions to overstate the efficacy, minimize the
risk, broaden the indication, make unsubstantiated superiority claims
for the product, or is overly fanciful. The safety review of a proposed
name is based on the findings of a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
of the proprietary name, and is focused on the avoidance of medical
errors. FDA not only considers the potential for a name to be spelled
similarly and/or sound similar to a currently marketed product or one
that is in the approval pipeline, but also considers the potential for
the proposed name to inadvertently function as a source of error for
reasons other than look and sound-alike name confusion, for instance
whether the abbreviation for the drug would be similar to the
abbreviation of another drug product.
Consideration also is given to the proposed product's
characteristics including its intended use, dosage form and strength,
and route of administration, because the product characteristics
provide a context for communication of the product name and ultimately
determine the use of the product in the usual clinical practice
setting. In addition, because product-name confusion can occur at any
point in the medication use process, FDA considers the potential for
confusion throughout the process, including product procurement,
prescribing and ordering, dispensing, administration, and monitoring
the impact of the medication.
Currently, the data generated to access this information is
internal to FDA. However, there have been a number of calls for
industry to become involved in the name testing process including
[[Page 27002]]
IOM's 2006 report, IOM's 1999 report ``To Err is Human,''
Recommendation 238 from the HHS Advisory Committee on
Regulatory Reform's November 21, 2002 report, and, most recently, in
the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA IV) performance goals.
In Title I of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of
2007 (FDAAA) (Public Law 110-85), Congress reauthorized and expanded
the Prescription Drug User Fee program for FY 2008 through FY 2012
(PDUFA IV). As part of the performance goals and procedures set forth
in an enclosure to the letter from the Secretary of the Health and
Human Services referred to in section 101(c) of FDAAA, FDA agreed to
publish a concept paper on and implement a pilot program to enable
pharmaceutical firms participating in the pilot to evaluate proposed
proprietary names and submit the data generated from those evaluations
to FDA for review. This process is consistent with other areas of drug
review in which FDA evaluates data generated by firms rather than
producing such data independently. FDA intends the concept paper to
provide transparency to the FDA review processes, as well as to provide
a consistent, scientific approach to the review of proprietary names
data. FDA agreed to conduct a public meeting to discuss the content of
the concept paper, which will describe the logistics of the pilot
program, proposed recommendations for carrying out a proprietary name
review, and the way FDA intends to review submissions made under the
pilot program. FDA is developing the concept paper, which contains its
current thinking on the logistics of the pilot and name testing and
evaluation under the pilot. The concept paper will be available at the
Division of Dockets Management and on the Internet prior to the meeting
(see ADDRESSES). FDA welcomes written and electronic comments on the
draft concept paper before and after the public meeting (see section IV
of this document).
II. Scope of Public Meeting
At the public meeting, FDA will present its current thinking on
proprietary name review testing and the proposed pilot program, and
will solicit feedback from industry, patient safety groups, academics,
health care professionals, other governmental agencies, and the public.
The meeting will include panel discussions and individual and/or joint
presentations. Some of the key questions that will be considered at the
meeting include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. What are best practices in safety and promotional testing of
proprietary names? What are the limitations of current methods and how
may they be overcome?
2. What combination of tests should be undertaken and what data
should be submitted by sponsors participating in the pilot? Discussion
of testing procedures should focus on advances in the field of name
testing since the 2003 public meetings (e.g., improvements in test
design, accuracy, and validation, as well as use of practitioner input
in the range of clinical settings in which drugs are procured,
prescribed, prepared/dispensed, administered, and monitored).
3. How should testing be standardized to achieve valid, reliable
results across studies?
4. What criteria should FDA consider in evaluating the testing done
and the data submitted?
5. How should the pilot program be structured and evaluated?
6. Are there any public health concerns raised by the pilot program
and how should they be addressed?
Speakers who wish to present material in the public meeting must
register before the meeting (see section III of this document). Time
will be allowed for questions and answers after each panel discussion.
Information gathered from the meeting and from comments submitted
to the docket will be used to develop the final concept paper. FDA
intends to publish the final concept paper by the end of FY 2008 and
expects to begin enrollment in the pilot in FY 2009.
III. Attendance and Registration
There is no fee to attend the meeting, and attendees who do not
wish to make an oral presentation do not need to register. Seating will
be on a first-come, first-served basis.
If you would like to make an oral presentation during the meeting,
you must register and provide an abstract of your presentation by close
of business on May 23, 2008. You must provide your name, title,
business affiliation (if applicable), address, telephone and fax
numbers, and e-mail address to Lana Pauls (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT). You should identify the topic or section of the draft concept
paper you wish to address in your presentation, whether you wish to
address comments on day one or day two, and the approximate time
requested for your presentation. FDA has identified topics of special
interest in section II of this document and is posting a draft concept
paper and agenda on the Internet (see ADDRESSES). The Centers may
change the time allotted depending on the number of people requesting
to present. Individuals and organizations with common interests are
urged to consolidate or coordinate their presentations and to request
time for a joint presentation. Persons registered to make an oral
presentation should check in before the meeting. If you need special
accommodations because of disability, please contact Lana Pauls (see
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) at least 7 days before the meeting.
IV. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments regarding issues and
questions presented in the concept paper or at the meeting. Submit a
single copy of electronic comments or two paper copies of any mailed
comments, except that individuals may submit one paper copy. Comments
are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Please note that on January 15, 2008, the FDA Division of Dockets
Management Web site transitioned to the Federal Dockets Management
System (FDMS). FDMS is a Government-wide, electronic docket management
system. Electronic comments or submissions will be accepted by FDA only
through FDMS at https://www.regulations.gov.
V. Transcripts
Please be advised that as soon as a transcript is available, it
will be accessible at https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/acmenu.htm.
It may be viewed at the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD. A
transcript will also be available in either hardcopy or on CD-ROM,
after submission of a Freedom of Information request. Written requests
are to be sent to Division of Freedom of Information (HFI-35), Office
of Management Programs, Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers
Lane, rm. 6-30, Rockville, MD 20857.
Dated: May 6, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E8-10513 Filed 5-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S