Avocados Grown in South Florida and Imported Avocados; Revision of the Maturity Requirements, 26941-26945 [E8-10462]
Download as PDF
26941
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 73, No. 92
Monday, May 12, 2008
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 915 and 944
[Docket No. AMS–FV–07–0054; FV07–915–
2 FR]
Avocados Grown in South Florida and
Imported Avocados; Revision of the
Maturity Requirements
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule revises the maturity
requirements currently prescribed for
avocados grown in South Florida and
for avocados imported into the United
States that are shipped to the fresh
market. The Avocado Administrative
Committee (Committee) which locally
administers the marketing order for
avocados grown in South Florida
recommended the change for Florida
avocados. A corresponding change in
the import regulation is also required
under section 8e of the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937. This
rule requires that avocados which fail
the maturity requirements and are
reworked and presented for reinspection
must meet the maturity requirements
which correspond to the date of the
original inspection. This rule will help
ensure only mature avocados are
shipped to the fresh market.
DATES: Effective Date: May 13, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William G. Pimental, Marketing
Specialist, or Christian D. Nissen,
Regional Manager, Southeast Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA;
Telephone: (863) 324–3375, Fax: (863)
325–8793, or E-mail:
William.Pimental@usda.gov or
Christian.Nissen@usda.gov.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:42 May 09, 2008
Jkt 214001
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final
rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 915, as amended (7 CFR part 915),
regulating the handling of avocados
grown in South Florida, hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is
effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
This rule is also issued under section
8e of the Act, which provides that
whenever certain specified
commodities, including avocados, are
regulated under a Federal marketing
order, imports of these commodities
into the United States are prohibited
unless they meet the same or
comparable grade, size, quality, or
maturity requirements as those in effect
for the domestically produced
commodities.
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
to have retroactive effect. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
There are no administrative
procedures which must be exhausted
prior to any judicial challenge to the
provisions of import regulations issued
under section 8e of the Act.
This final rule revises the maturity
requirements currently prescribed under
the order for avocados grown in South
Florida. This rule requires that avocados
which fail the maturity requirements
and are reworked and presented for
reinspection must meet the maturity
requirements which correspond to the
date of the original inspection. This
action, unanimously recommended by
the Committee, will help ensure that
only mature avocados are shipped to the
fresh market.
Section 915.51 of the order provides
the authority to issue regulations
establishing specific maturity
requirements for avocados grown in
South Florida. Section 915.332 of the
order’s rules and regulations establishes
the requisite maturity requirements for
avocados. The maturity requirements
specify minimum weights, diameters,
and shipping dates for approximately 60
different varieties of avocados. These
dates and requirements are reflected in
the avocado maturity schedule as it
appears in Table I of § 915.332(a)(2).
Under the terms of the marketing
order, fresh market shipments of Florida
avocados are required to be inspected
and are subject to grade, pack,
container, and maturity requirements.
The maturity requirements are intended
to prevent the shipment of immature
avocados to the fresh market. This helps
to improve buyer confidence in the
marketplace, and fosters increased
consumption.
This rule changes the way the
maturity requirements are applied.
Specifically, this rule requires avocados
which fail maturity requirements and
are reworked and presented for
reinspection to meet the maturity
requirements which correspond to the
date of the original inspection.
The maturity requirements for
avocados are expressed in terms of
minimum weights and diameters in
conjunction with specific dates during
the shipping season. Each regulated
variety has its own set of dates and
requirements on the maturity schedule.
E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM
12MYR1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
26942
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 92 / Monday, May 12, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
The maturity requirements for the
various varieties are different because
each variety has its own growing season
and stages when the fruit is mature and
ready to be harvested.
With avocados, the level of maturity
is determined by when the avocado is
harvested. Because the maturity process
ceases once the fruit is severed from the
tree, an avocado needs to remain on the
tree until it is mature. According to Paul
Harding, a plant physiologist for the
Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA,
the stage of maturity of the fruit when
harvested is directly related to its
palatability and is the most important
factor that influences eating quality.1
Avocados which are not mature at the
time of harvest will not ripen properly.
Avocados that do not ripen properly can
have an unpleasant taste and
consistency which negatively affects
customer satisfaction. Consequently, the
dates on the maturity schedule have
been carefully established based on
years of testing to ensure avocados
shipped using the schedule are mature
enough to complete the ripening
process.
The maturity schedule is divided into
A, B, C, and D dates which reflect the
different stages of maturity associated
with an individual variety. Larger sized
fruit within a variety matures earlier,
while smaller fruit needs to remain on
the tree longer to reach maturity.
Consequently, A dates are associated
with larger sizes and are established
early in the variety’s shipping season.
For a majority of varieties, the schedule
also includes B and C dates that fall
somewhere in between the A and D
dates for the particular variety. These
dates proceed in stages as the season
advances, allowing for the shipment of
progressively smaller sizes and weights
as a variety matures. The D date marks
the end of a variety’s marketing season
and releases all remaining sizes for
shipment to the fresh market. This
gradual shift in the maturity standards
from the beginning of the season to its
end helps ensure that all sizes remain
on the tree long enough to reach
maturity.
As an example, consider the Simmons
variety. The A date for the Simmons is
the Monday nearest June 20, and
requires a minimum weight of 16
ounces or a minimum diameter of 39⁄16
inches for fruit shipped to the fresh
market. The corresponding B date is the
Monday nearest July 4, and reduces the
minimum weight to 14 ounces or a
1 Harding, Paul L. ‘‘The Relation of Maturity to
Quality in Florida Avocados.’’ Proceedings of the
Florida State Horticultural Society 67 (1954):276–
280.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:42 May 09, 2008
Jkt 214001
minimum diameter of 37⁄16 inches. The
C date is the Monday nearest to July 18,
and further reduces the minimum
weight and size requirements to 12
ounces or 31⁄16 inches, and the
requirements end with a scheduled D
date of the Monday nearest to August 1
when all remaining fruit of this variety
can be shipped.
Over the years, the maturity schedule
has been determined to be the best
indicator of maturity for the different
varieties of avocados grown in Florida,
and growers and handlers rely on the
schedule in making harvesting, packing,
and shipping decisions. The maturity
schedule facilitates the shipment of the
different varieties of avocados as they
mature, and helps ensure that only
mature fruit is shipped to the fresh
market. This in turn helps promote
consumer satisfaction which is essential
for the successful marketing of the crop.
Florida avocados are inspected for
compliance with the rules and
regulations established under the order,
including the maturity requirements, by
the Federal or Federal State Inspection
Service. When a lot of avocados fails
inspection, the handler has the
opportunity to rework the lot to remove
the fruit that caused the lot to fail. This
usually entails removing any damaged
or undersized fruit from the lot. Once
the lot has been reworked, the lot is
presented for reinspection.
However, the Committee has
discovered that in some cases where lots
fail for maturity, handlers are only
holding the avocados until the next date
under the maturity schedule and then
presenting them for reinspection to
benefit from the reduced size and
weight requirements rather than
reworking the lots to remove undersized
fruit. The Committee agreed this
practice undermines the purpose of the
maturity requirements and results in
immature fruit being shipped to the
fresh market.
Committee members stated the
maturity requirements were established
to ensure that only mature avocados
reach the fresh market. By allowing a
handler to just hold the fruit until the
next date on the maturity schedule, the
overall maturity of the lot is not
improved. Because the maturity process
ends once the fruit is picked, fruit that
fails to meet the maturity standards at
the time of inspection will not develop
in maturity while being held in the box.
The only way to increase the overall
maturity of the lot is to remove the fruit
which caused the lot to fail at the time
of inspection.
The Committee believes allowing fruit
that failed maturity requirements to be
held until the next date on the maturity
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
schedule without being reworked to
remove undersized fruit permits
immature fruit to be shipped to the fresh
market. A lot that fails inspection for
maturity can contain a significant
amount of avocados which are
undersized or underweight. Based on
the schedule, this fruit was picked too
soon, and most likely did not spend
enough time on the tree to reach the
proper level of maturity. Because this
fruit is immature, it will frequently not
ripen properly, and it would have a
negative impact on the market and will
likely result in the loss of future
avocado sales.
The requirements associated with the
initial inspection correlate more closely
with the time of picking and as such
remain the best measure of the maturity
of the lot. Consequently, the Committee
agreed the maturity requirements
specified on the schedule at the time of
the original inspection should be the
requirements applied when the
avocados are presented for reinspection.
With this change, when avocados fail
inspection for maturity, the handler will
continue to be allowed to immediately
rework the lot to remove undersized
and/or underweight fruit and present
the lot for reinspection or hold the lot
to rework it later. However, the
reinspection will be conducted using
the maturity requirements for the date
the lot was originally presented for
inspection regardless of when it is
presented for reinspection. Even if a lot
is held until the next date on the
schedule, the requirements specified for
the original inspection will still apply,
and the avocados that caused the lot to
fail will have to be removed before the
lot will pass under a reinspection. This
change makes sure undersized and
underweight fruit have to be removed
before a lot can meet the necessary
requirements which in turn should help
further ensure that only mature fruit is
being shipped to the fresh market.
This change also makes the
reinspection procedures for maturity
requirements more consistent with
those applied for grade requirements.
The current grade requirement for
avocados is a U.S. No. 2 and is constant
throughout the year. The only way for
a lot that fails for grade to meet the
grade requirement is to have the fruit
which caused the lot to fail removed.
The Committee believes the process for
handling avocados which fail the
maturity requirements should be the
same. Because the maturity level does
not improve by just holding the
avocados, the maturity requirements
applied to that lot should remain
constant as it does with grade. This
change ensures that undersized and
E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM
12MYR1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 92 / Monday, May 12, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
underweight fruit are removed prior to
reinspection, maintaining the benefits of
the maturity schedule.
Prior to this final rule, when a lot of
avocados failed inspection, the handler
had the option to rework the lot, hold
the fruit to be reworked at a later date,
dump or destroy the fruit, send the fruit
for processing, or donate it to charity.
With this change, the handler has the
same options. However, fruit to be
reworked for maturity will be segregated
and placed under the supervision of the
Federal or Federal-State Inspection
Service using their Positive Lot
Identification (PLI) program to ensure
the lot is reworked to meet the
minimum maturity requirements
specified at the time of the initial
inspection. Once the lot, or any portion
thereof, is reworked, the Federal or
Federal-State Inspection Service will
reinspect the avocados applying the
maturity requirements for the date of the
original inspection. Also, all fruit in the
lot will need to be accounted for under
this process. Therefore, only fruit
meeting the initial maturity
requirements will be allowed to be
shipped to the fresh market.
Section 8e of the Act provides that
when certain domestically produced
commodities, including avocados, are
regulated under a Federal marketing
order, imports of that commodity must
meet the same or comparable grade,
size, quality, and maturity requirements.
Since this rule modifies maturity
requirements under the domestic
handling regulations, a corresponding
change to the avocado import maturity
regulations must also be established.
Minimum grade, quality, and maturity
requirements for avocados imported
into the United States are currently in
effect under § 944.31 (7 CFR 944.31).
The maturity requirements are specified
in § 944.31(a)(2). The Hass, Fuerte,
Zutano, and Edranol varieties of
avocados are exempt from the maturity
schedule, and continue to be exempt
under this rule. However, these varieties
must meet the minimum grade
requirement of a U.S. No. 2 for imported
avocados, which is not be changed by
this action.
This rule requires that imported
avocados which fail the maturity
requirements and are reworked and
presented for reinspection must meet
the maturity requirements which
correspond to the date of the original
inspection. With this change, fruit to be
reworked for maturity will be segregated
and placed under the supervision of the
Federal or Federal-State Inspection
Service using their PLI program to
ensure the lot is reworked to meet the
minimum maturity requirements
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:42 May 09, 2008
Jkt 214001
specified at the time of the initial
inspection.
Once the lot of avocados, or any
portion thereof, is reworked, the Federal
or Federal-State Inspection Service will
reinspect the lot applying the maturity
requirements for the date of the original
inspection. In addition, all fruit in the
lot will need to be accounted for under
this process. This will help ensure only
mature fruit that will ripen properly is
shipped to the fresh market. Consumers
prefer fruit that ripens properly. Thus,
importers will also benefit from this
change in maturity requirements.
Import data for calendar years 2002
through 2006 reveals the major
exporters of green-skin avocados to the
United States are Mexico, Chile, and the
Dominican Republic. Imports of greenskin avocados totaled approximately
10,163 metric tons in 2002, 13,770
metric tons in 2003, 8,729 metric tons
in 2004, 12,411 metric tons in 2005, and
10,389 metric tons in 2006. The
Dominican Republic is the largest
supplier of green-skin avocados,
accounting for approximately 98 percent
of imports.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf. Import regulations issued under
the Act are based on those established
under Federal marketing orders.
There are approximately 300
producers of avocados in the production
area and approximately 35 handlers
subject to regulation under the order.
There are approximately 65 importers of
the type of avocados that are regulated
under the order. Small agricultural
producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) as those
having annual receipts of less than
$750,000, and small agricultural service
firms, which include avocado handlers
and importers, are defined as those
whose annual receipts are less than
$6,500,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
According to the National
Agricultural Statistics Service and
Committee data, the average price for
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
26943
Florida avocados during the 2005–06
season was around $46.75 per 55-pound
bushel container, and total shipments
were near 470,000 55-pound bushel
equivalents. Using the average price and
shipment information provided by the
Committee, the majority of avocado
handlers have annual receipts of less
than $6,500,000. In addition, based on
avocado production, grower prices, and
the total number of Florida avocado
growers, the average annual grower
revenue is less than $750,000. Based on
information from the Foreign
Agricultural Service, USDA, the dollar
value of imported avocados ranged from
around $156.7 million in 2003 to $337.5
million in 2005. Using these numbers,
the majority of avocado importers have
annual receipts of less than $6,500,000.
Consequently, the majority of avocado
producers, handlers, and importers may
be classified as small entities.
This rule, recommended by the
Committee, revises the maturity
requirements currently prescribed for
avocados grown in South Florida and
for avocados imported into the United
States that are shipped to the fresh
market. This rule requires that avocados
which fail the maturity requirements
and are reworked and presented for
reinspection must meet the maturity
requirements which correspond to the
date of the original inspection. This rule
will help ensure that only mature
avocados are shipped to the fresh
market. This rule revises § 915.332,
which specifies the requisite maturity
requirements. Authority for this action
is provided in § 915.51 of the order.
This rule also revises § 944.31, which
specifies the maturity requirements for
imported avocados. The change in the
import regulation is required under
section 8e of the Act.
This rule could result in some
additional costs for handlers and
importers. These costs would be
associated primarily with the cost to
rework the lot and the added inspection
costs associated with having Federal or
Federal-State Inspection Service
supervision of lots that fail for maturity.
However, these costs are expected to be
minimal and should apply to no more
than a few shipments each year as only
a very small percentage of lots fail for
maturity.
The vast majority of handlers and
importers are already reworking lots
that fail for maturity to remove the
undersized and underweight avocados
that caused the lot to fail. Consequently,
reworking lots which fail for maturity is
already a standard practice for most of
the industry, and as such does not
represent an additional cost for most
handlers and importers.
E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM
12MYR1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
26944
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 92 / Monday, May 12, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
In addition, this rule could encourage
more careful spot picking to ensure that
the avocados are of the proper size or
weight to meet the requirements of the
maturity schedule. However, spot
picking is a standard industry practice,
so this should not result in any
additional cost.
Therefore, in most cases, any
additional costs resulting from this
change would be from the added
inspection costs associated with the
Federal or Federal-State Inspection
Service supervision of failing lots. Based
on information provided by the Federal
or Federal-State Inspection Service, the
added cost will be based on the time it
takes to apply the PLI program. For most
handlers and importers, this should be
accomplished in an hour or less.
Consequently, the added cost will be
based on the standard hourly rate
charged by the Federal or Federal-State
Inspection Service. These costs could
range from as low as $22.00 per hour to
$64.00 per hour for a lot of avocados. In
situations where a lot is reworked
immediately, the handler or importer
may not even accrue any additional
charges.
With average lot sizes ranging from
approximately 100 55-pound cartons of
avocados for a small lot to large lots
containing approximately 800 55-pound
cartons, and with avocados selling for a
season average of around $46.75 per 55pound container, the cost of inspection
is a small percentage of the total value
of the lot. Consequently, considering the
possible added costs associated with
this change, and the small number of
lots affected, the overall costs associated
with this rule are expected to be
minimal.
Florida avocado producers and
handlers have found that the maturity
requirements have been beneficial in the
successful marketing of their avocado
crop. Experience has shown when
immature avocados are found in market
channels, they tend to have a price
depressing effect on the market and
negatively affect repeat purchases.
Preventing the shipment of immature
avocados improves buyer confidence in
the marketplace, and fosters increased
consumption. This change is expected
to provide added assurance that the
avocados marketed are of satisfactory
maturity and will ripen properly which
is expected to further promote customer
satisfaction.
This rule is expected to similarly
impact importers of avocados. Nonexempt varieties of imported avocados
have met the minimum weight or
diameter maturity requirements in past
seasons, and this is expected to
continue. Thus, USDA believes this
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:42 May 09, 2008
Jkt 214001
change will not limit the quantity of
imported avocados or place an undue
burden on exporters, or importers of
avocados. The marketplace price and
quality benefits expected for Florida
growers and handlers as a result of this
rule will also benefit exporters and
importers of avocados.
As most handlers and importers are
already reworking lots which fail for
maturity to remove undersized and
underweight fruit, this change is not
expected to impact the total number of
avocado shipments. It is, however,
expected to have a positive effect in the
marketplace by helping to ensure only
mature avocados are reaching the
market which in turn should provide a
strong price base for the industry.
This rule may impose some additional
costs on producers, handlers, and
importers. However, the costs are
expected to be minimal, and will be
offset by the benefits of this rule. This
action benefits consumers, producers,
handlers, and importers by providing
consumers with a better, more mature
piece of fruit. The costs and benefits of
this rule are not expected to be
disproportionately greater or less
significant for small entities than for
large entities.
One alternative to this action
considered was to make no change.
However, the Committee believes this
was not an acceptable alternative as it
could result in immature avocados
reaching the fresh market. The
Committee agreed that allowing
immature avocados to reach the fresh
market would be detrimental to the
industry as a whole. Therefore, this
alternative was rejected.
This final rule revises the maturity
requirements under the Florida avocado
marketing order. Accordingly, this
action will not impose any additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large date handlers.
As with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
As noted in the initial regulatory
flexibility analysis, USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with
this final rule. Further, the public
comment received concerning the
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
proposal did not address the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis.
In addition, the Committee’s meeting
was widely publicized throughout the
avocado industry and all interested
persons were invited to attend the
meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations. Like all Committee
meetings, the meeting where this action
was recommended was a public meeting
and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express views on this issue.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on December 10, 2007 (72 FR
69624). Copies of the rule were mailed
or sent via facsimile to all Committee
members and avocado handlers. Finally,
the rule was made available through the
Internet by USDA and the Office of the
Federal Register. A 60-day comment
period ending February 8, 2008, was
provided to allow interested persons to
respond to the proposal.
One comment was received during
the comment period in response to the
proposal. The commenter was in favor
of the proposal. The commenter stated
that they handle both imported and
domestically grown avocados. The
commenter stated that if fruit is picked
in an immature state prior to the date
stated on the maturity schedule, the
fruit will never ripen. The commenter
stated support for the proposed rule
because this rule closes a loophole in
the system that could allow immature
avocados to enter the market.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
In accordance with section 8e of the
Act, the United States Trade
Representative has concurred with the
issuance of this rule.
After consideration of all relevant
matter presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
It is further found that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register (5
U.S.C. 553) because this rule needs to be
in place prior to the start of the 2008–
09 season. Further, handlers are aware
of this rule, which was recommended at
a public meeting. Also, a 60-day
E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM
12MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 92 / Monday, May 12, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
comment period was provided for in the
proposed rule.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
List of Subjects
38 CFR Part 17
7 CFR Part 915
RIN 2900–AM40
Avocados, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Provision of Hospital Care and Medical
Services During Certain Disasters or
Emergencies
7 CFR Part 944
Avocados, Food grades and standards,
Grapefruit, Grapes, Imports, Kiwifruit,
Limes, Olives, Oranges.
I For the reasons set forth above, 7 CFR
parts 915 and 944 are amended as
follows:
I 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
parts 915 and 944 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
PART 915—AVOCADOS GROWN IN
SOUTH FLORIDA
2. A new paragraph (a)(3) is added to
§ 915.332 to read as follows:
I
§ 915.332 Florida avocado maturity
regulation.
(a) * * *
(3) Avocados which fail to meet the
maturity requirements specified in this
section must be maintained under the
supervision of the Federal or FederalState Inspection Service using the
Positive Lot Identification program, and
when presented for reinspection, must
meet the maturity requirements which
correspond to the date of the original
inspection.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 944—FRUITS; IMPORT
REGULATIONS
3. A new paragraph (a)(3) is added to
§ 944.31 to read as follows:
I
§ 944.31 Avocado import maturity
regulation.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
(a) * * *
(3) Avocados which fail to meet the
maturity requirements specified in this
section must be maintained under the
supervision of the Federal or FederalState Inspection Service using the
Positive Lot Identification program, and
when presented for reinspection, must
meet the maturity requirements which
correspond to the date of the original
inspection.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: May 6, 2008.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E8–10462 Filed 5–9–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:42 May 09, 2008
Jkt 214001
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) hereby establishes
regulations regarding the provision of
hospital care and medical services
under the VA Emergency Preparedness
Act of 2002, to individuals responding
to, involved in, or otherwise affected by
certain disasters or emergencies
(including individuals who otherwise
do not have VA eligibility for such care
and services).
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective May 12, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tony A. Guagliardo, Director, Business
Policy, Chief Business Office (163),
Veterans Health Administration,
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20420 (202) 254–0406. (This is not a
toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
document amends VA medical
regulations to implement provisions of
Public Law 107–287, the VA Emergency
Preparedness Act of 2002, regarding
hospital care and medical services
provided to individuals responding to,
involved in, or otherwise affected by
certain disasters or emergencies
(including individuals who otherwise
do not have VA eligibility for such care
and services).
This final rule adopts, without
change, the provisions of the
corresponding proposed rule published
in the Federal Register on July 12, 2007
(72 FR 38042), based on the rationale set
forth in the proposed rule and this
document. The proposed rule provided
for a 60-day comment period which
ended September 10, 2007. We received
comments from three individuals. The
comments are discussed below.
One commenter merely expressed
agreement with the provisions of the
proposed rule.
A second commenter asserted that
free care should be provided by the
Federal government to anyone who
needs it when a disaster occurs. We
made no changes based on this
comment. As proposed and under this
final rule at § 17.86(e), individuals who
receive hospital care or medical services
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
26945
under the emergency provisions are
responsible for the cost of the hospital
care or medical services when charges
are mandated by Federal law (including
applicable appropriation acts) or when
the cost of care or services is not
reimbursed by other-than-VA Federal
departments or agencies. This is
intended to help ensure that funding
will be available to VA for hospital care
and medical services for veterans
eligible for such care and services and
in some instances is required by Federal
law.
A third commenter expressed support
for the proposed rule changes. The
commenter also expressed views
concerning how VA should prepare for
and act in response to disasters. Those
statements concern matters not within
the scope of this rulemaking.
Accordingly, we made no changes based
on this comment.
Administrative Procedure Act
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d), we find
that there is good cause to dispense with
a 30-day delay in the effective date of
this rule. We find that delay in its
effective date would be contrary to the
public interest. A disaster or emergency
requiring the use of this rule could
occur at any time and it is in the public
interest that we have in place
regulations to implement the emergency
program under 38 U.S.C. 1785, in
compliance with the provisions of
section 205 of division I of Public Law
110–161, the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2008, if and when
the need arises. Further, we find that
this rule’s provisions are not ones for
which members of the public would
need a delay in effective date to prepare
for the changes made by the rule.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
given year. This rule will have no such
effect on State, local, and tribal
governments, or the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This document contains no provisions
constituting a collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521).
Executive Order 12866
Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM
12MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 92 (Monday, May 12, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26941-26945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10462]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 92 / Monday, May 12, 2008 / Rules and
Regulations
[[Page 26941]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 915 and 944
[Docket No. AMS-FV-07-0054; FV07-915-2 FR]
Avocados Grown in South Florida and Imported Avocados; Revision
of the Maturity Requirements
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule revises the maturity requirements currently
prescribed for avocados grown in South Florida and for avocados
imported into the United States that are shipped to the fresh market.
The Avocado Administrative Committee (Committee) which locally
administers the marketing order for avocados grown in South Florida
recommended the change for Florida avocados. A corresponding change in
the import regulation is also required under section 8e of the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937. This rule requires that
avocados which fail the maturity requirements and are reworked and
presented for reinspection must meet the maturity requirements which
correspond to the date of the original inspection. This rule will help
ensure only mature avocados are shipped to the fresh market.
DATES: Effective Date: May 13, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William G. Pimental, Marketing
Specialist, or Christian D. Nissen, Regional Manager, Southeast
Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit
and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324-3375, Fax:
(863) 325-8793, or E-mail: William.Pimental@usda.gov or
Christian.Nissen@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202)
720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule is issued under Marketing
Order No. 915, as amended (7 CFR part 915), regulating the handling of
avocados grown in South Florida, hereinafter referred to as the
``order.'' The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter
referred to as the ``Act.''
This rule is also issued under section 8e of the Act, which
provides that whenever certain specified commodities, including
avocados, are regulated under a Federal marketing order, imports of
these commodities into the United States are prohibited unless they
meet the same or comparable grade, size, quality, or maturity
requirements as those in effect for the domestically produced
commodities.
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive
effect. This rule will not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable
conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
There are no administrative procedures which must be exhausted
prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of import regulations
issued under section 8e of the Act.
This final rule revises the maturity requirements currently
prescribed under the order for avocados grown in South Florida. This
rule requires that avocados which fail the maturity requirements and
are reworked and presented for reinspection must meet the maturity
requirements which correspond to the date of the original inspection.
This action, unanimously recommended by the Committee, will help ensure
that only mature avocados are shipped to the fresh market.
Section 915.51 of the order provides the authority to issue
regulations establishing specific maturity requirements for avocados
grown in South Florida. Section 915.332 of the order's rules and
regulations establishes the requisite maturity requirements for
avocados. The maturity requirements specify minimum weights, diameters,
and shipping dates for approximately 60 different varieties of
avocados. These dates and requirements are reflected in the avocado
maturity schedule as it appears in Table I of Sec. 915.332(a)(2).
Under the terms of the marketing order, fresh market shipments of
Florida avocados are required to be inspected and are subject to grade,
pack, container, and maturity requirements. The maturity requirements
are intended to prevent the shipment of immature avocados to the fresh
market. This helps to improve buyer confidence in the marketplace, and
fosters increased consumption.
This rule changes the way the maturity requirements are applied.
Specifically, this rule requires avocados which fail maturity
requirements and are reworked and presented for reinspection to meet
the maturity requirements which correspond to the date of the original
inspection.
The maturity requirements for avocados are expressed in terms of
minimum weights and diameters in conjunction with specific dates during
the shipping season. Each regulated variety has its own set of dates
and requirements on the maturity schedule.
[[Page 26942]]
The maturity requirements for the various varieties are different
because each variety has its own growing season and stages when the
fruit is mature and ready to be harvested.
With avocados, the level of maturity is determined by when the
avocado is harvested. Because the maturity process ceases once the
fruit is severed from the tree, an avocado needs to remain on the tree
until it is mature. According to Paul Harding, a plant physiologist for
the Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA, the stage of maturity of the
fruit when harvested is directly related to its palatability and is the
most important factor that influences eating quality.\1\ Avocados which
are not mature at the time of harvest will not ripen properly. Avocados
that do not ripen properly can have an unpleasant taste and consistency
which negatively affects customer satisfaction. Consequently, the dates
on the maturity schedule have been carefully established based on years
of testing to ensure avocados shipped using the schedule are mature
enough to complete the ripening process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Harding, Paul L. ``The Relation of Maturity to Quality in
Florida Avocados.'' Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural
Society 67 (1954):276-280.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The maturity schedule is divided into A, B, C, and D dates which
reflect the different stages of maturity associated with an individual
variety. Larger sized fruit within a variety matures earlier, while
smaller fruit needs to remain on the tree longer to reach maturity.
Consequently, A dates are associated with larger sizes and are
established early in the variety's shipping season. For a majority of
varieties, the schedule also includes B and C dates that fall somewhere
in between the A and D dates for the particular variety. These dates
proceed in stages as the season advances, allowing for the shipment of
progressively smaller sizes and weights as a variety matures. The D
date marks the end of a variety's marketing season and releases all
remaining sizes for shipment to the fresh market. This gradual shift in
the maturity standards from the beginning of the season to its end
helps ensure that all sizes remain on the tree long enough to reach
maturity.
As an example, consider the Simmons variety. The A date for the
Simmons is the Monday nearest June 20, and requires a minimum weight of
16 ounces or a minimum diameter of 3\9/16\ inches for fruit shipped to
the fresh market. The corresponding B date is the Monday nearest July
4, and reduces the minimum weight to 14 ounces or a minimum diameter of
3\7/16\ inches. The C date is the Monday nearest to July 18, and
further reduces the minimum weight and size requirements to 12 ounces
or 3\1/16\ inches, and the requirements end with a scheduled D date of
the Monday nearest to August 1 when all remaining fruit of this variety
can be shipped.
Over the years, the maturity schedule has been determined to be the
best indicator of maturity for the different varieties of avocados
grown in Florida, and growers and handlers rely on the schedule in
making harvesting, packing, and shipping decisions. The maturity
schedule facilitates the shipment of the different varieties of
avocados as they mature, and helps ensure that only mature fruit is
shipped to the fresh market. This in turn helps promote consumer
satisfaction which is essential for the successful marketing of the
crop.
Florida avocados are inspected for compliance with the rules and
regulations established under the order, including the maturity
requirements, by the Federal or Federal State Inspection Service. When
a lot of avocados fails inspection, the handler has the opportunity to
rework the lot to remove the fruit that caused the lot to fail. This
usually entails removing any damaged or undersized fruit from the lot.
Once the lot has been reworked, the lot is presented for reinspection.
However, the Committee has discovered that in some cases where lots
fail for maturity, handlers are only holding the avocados until the
next date under the maturity schedule and then presenting them for
reinspection to benefit from the reduced size and weight requirements
rather than reworking the lots to remove undersized fruit. The
Committee agreed this practice undermines the purpose of the maturity
requirements and results in immature fruit being shipped to the fresh
market.
Committee members stated the maturity requirements were established
to ensure that only mature avocados reach the fresh market. By allowing
a handler to just hold the fruit until the next date on the maturity
schedule, the overall maturity of the lot is not improved. Because the
maturity process ends once the fruit is picked, fruit that fails to
meet the maturity standards at the time of inspection will not develop
in maturity while being held in the box. The only way to increase the
overall maturity of the lot is to remove the fruit which caused the lot
to fail at the time of inspection.
The Committee believes allowing fruit that failed maturity
requirements to be held until the next date on the maturity schedule
without being reworked to remove undersized fruit permits immature
fruit to be shipped to the fresh market. A lot that fails inspection
for maturity can contain a significant amount of avocados which are
undersized or underweight. Based on the schedule, this fruit was picked
too soon, and most likely did not spend enough time on the tree to
reach the proper level of maturity. Because this fruit is immature, it
will frequently not ripen properly, and it would have a negative impact
on the market and will likely result in the loss of future avocado
sales.
The requirements associated with the initial inspection correlate
more closely with the time of picking and as such remain the best
measure of the maturity of the lot. Consequently, the Committee agreed
the maturity requirements specified on the schedule at the time of the
original inspection should be the requirements applied when the
avocados are presented for reinspection.
With this change, when avocados fail inspection for maturity, the
handler will continue to be allowed to immediately rework the lot to
remove undersized and/or underweight fruit and present the lot for
reinspection or hold the lot to rework it later. However, the
reinspection will be conducted using the maturity requirements for the
date the lot was originally presented for inspection regardless of when
it is presented for reinspection. Even if a lot is held until the next
date on the schedule, the requirements specified for the original
inspection will still apply, and the avocados that caused the lot to
fail will have to be removed before the lot will pass under a
reinspection. This change makes sure undersized and underweight fruit
have to be removed before a lot can meet the necessary requirements
which in turn should help further ensure that only mature fruit is
being shipped to the fresh market.
This change also makes the reinspection procedures for maturity
requirements more consistent with those applied for grade requirements.
The current grade requirement for avocados is a U.S. No. 2 and is
constant throughout the year. The only way for a lot that fails for
grade to meet the grade requirement is to have the fruit which caused
the lot to fail removed. The Committee believes the process for
handling avocados which fail the maturity requirements should be the
same. Because the maturity level does not improve by just holding the
avocados, the maturity requirements applied to that lot should remain
constant as it does with grade. This change ensures that undersized and
[[Page 26943]]
underweight fruit are removed prior to reinspection, maintaining the
benefits of the maturity schedule.
Prior to this final rule, when a lot of avocados failed inspection,
the handler had the option to rework the lot, hold the fruit to be
reworked at a later date, dump or destroy the fruit, send the fruit for
processing, or donate it to charity. With this change, the handler has
the same options. However, fruit to be reworked for maturity will be
segregated and placed under the supervision of the Federal or Federal-
State Inspection Service using their Positive Lot Identification (PLI)
program to ensure the lot is reworked to meet the minimum maturity
requirements specified at the time of the initial inspection. Once the
lot, or any portion thereof, is reworked, the Federal or Federal-State
Inspection Service will reinspect the avocados applying the maturity
requirements for the date of the original inspection. Also, all fruit
in the lot will need to be accounted for under this process. Therefore,
only fruit meeting the initial maturity requirements will be allowed to
be shipped to the fresh market.
Section 8e of the Act provides that when certain domestically
produced commodities, including avocados, are regulated under a Federal
marketing order, imports of that commodity must meet the same or
comparable grade, size, quality, and maturity requirements. Since this
rule modifies maturity requirements under the domestic handling
regulations, a corresponding change to the avocado import maturity
regulations must also be established.
Minimum grade, quality, and maturity requirements for avocados
imported into the United States are currently in effect under Sec.
944.31 (7 CFR 944.31). The maturity requirements are specified in Sec.
944.31(a)(2). The Hass, Fuerte, Zutano, and Edranol varieties of
avocados are exempt from the maturity schedule, and continue to be
exempt under this rule. However, these varieties must meet the minimum
grade requirement of a U.S. No. 2 for imported avocados, which is not
be changed by this action.
This rule requires that imported avocados which fail the maturity
requirements and are reworked and presented for reinspection must meet
the maturity requirements which correspond to the date of the original
inspection. With this change, fruit to be reworked for maturity will be
segregated and placed under the supervision of the Federal or Federal-
State Inspection Service using their PLI program to ensure the lot is
reworked to meet the minimum maturity requirements specified at the
time of the initial inspection.
Once the lot of avocados, or any portion thereof, is reworked, the
Federal or Federal-State Inspection Service will reinspect the lot
applying the maturity requirements for the date of the original
inspection. In addition, all fruit in the lot will need to be accounted
for under this process. This will help ensure only mature fruit that
will ripen properly is shipped to the fresh market. Consumers prefer
fruit that ripens properly. Thus, importers will also benefit from this
change in maturity requirements.
Import data for calendar years 2002 through 2006 reveals the major
exporters of green-skin avocados to the United States are Mexico,
Chile, and the Dominican Republic. Imports of green-skin avocados
totaled approximately 10,163 metric tons in 2002, 13,770 metric tons in
2003, 8,729 metric tons in 2004, 12,411 metric tons in 2005, and 10,389
metric tons in 2006. The Dominican Republic is the largest supplier of
green-skin avocados, accounting for approximately 98 percent of
imports.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Import regulations issued under
the Act are based on those established under Federal marketing orders.
There are approximately 300 producers of avocados in the production
area and approximately 35 handlers subject to regulation under the
order. There are approximately 65 importers of the type of avocados
that are regulated under the order. Small agricultural producers are
defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) as those having
annual receipts of less than $750,000, and small agricultural service
firms, which include avocado handlers and importers, are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less than $6,500,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
According to the National Agricultural Statistics Service and
Committee data, the average price for Florida avocados during the 2005-
06 season was around $46.75 per 55-pound bushel container, and total
shipments were near 470,000 55-pound bushel equivalents. Using the
average price and shipment information provided by the Committee, the
majority of avocado handlers have annual receipts of less than
$6,500,000. In addition, based on avocado production, grower prices,
and the total number of Florida avocado growers, the average annual
grower revenue is less than $750,000. Based on information from the
Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA, the dollar value of imported
avocados ranged from around $156.7 million in 2003 to $337.5 million in
2005. Using these numbers, the majority of avocado importers have
annual receipts of less than $6,500,000. Consequently, the majority of
avocado producers, handlers, and importers may be classified as small
entities.
This rule, recommended by the Committee, revises the maturity
requirements currently prescribed for avocados grown in South Florida
and for avocados imported into the United States that are shipped to
the fresh market. This rule requires that avocados which fail the
maturity requirements and are reworked and presented for reinspection
must meet the maturity requirements which correspond to the date of the
original inspection. This rule will help ensure that only mature
avocados are shipped to the fresh market. This rule revises Sec.
915.332, which specifies the requisite maturity requirements. Authority
for this action is provided in Sec. 915.51 of the order. This rule
also revises Sec. 944.31, which specifies the maturity requirements
for imported avocados. The change in the import regulation is required
under section 8e of the Act.
This rule could result in some additional costs for handlers and
importers. These costs would be associated primarily with the cost to
rework the lot and the added inspection costs associated with having
Federal or Federal-State Inspection Service supervision of lots that
fail for maturity. However, these costs are expected to be minimal and
should apply to no more than a few shipments each year as only a very
small percentage of lots fail for maturity.
The vast majority of handlers and importers are already reworking
lots that fail for maturity to remove the undersized and underweight
avocados that caused the lot to fail. Consequently, reworking lots
which fail for maturity is already a standard practice for most of the
industry, and as such does not represent an additional cost for most
handlers and importers.
[[Page 26944]]
In addition, this rule could encourage more careful spot picking to
ensure that the avocados are of the proper size or weight to meet the
requirements of the maturity schedule. However, spot picking is a
standard industry practice, so this should not result in any additional
cost.
Therefore, in most cases, any additional costs resulting from this
change would be from the added inspection costs associated with the
Federal or Federal-State Inspection Service supervision of failing
lots. Based on information provided by the Federal or Federal-State
Inspection Service, the added cost will be based on the time it takes
to apply the PLI program. For most handlers and importers, this should
be accomplished in an hour or less. Consequently, the added cost will
be based on the standard hourly rate charged by the Federal or Federal-
State Inspection Service. These costs could range from as low as $22.00
per hour to $64.00 per hour for a lot of avocados. In situations where
a lot is reworked immediately, the handler or importer may not even
accrue any additional charges.
With average lot sizes ranging from approximately 100 55-pound
cartons of avocados for a small lot to large lots containing
approximately 800 55-pound cartons, and with avocados selling for a
season average of around $46.75 per 55-pound container, the cost of
inspection is a small percentage of the total value of the lot.
Consequently, considering the possible added costs associated with this
change, and the small number of lots affected, the overall costs
associated with this rule are expected to be minimal.
Florida avocado producers and handlers have found that the maturity
requirements have been beneficial in the successful marketing of their
avocado crop. Experience has shown when immature avocados are found in
market channels, they tend to have a price depressing effect on the
market and negatively affect repeat purchases. Preventing the shipment
of immature avocados improves buyer confidence in the marketplace, and
fosters increased consumption. This change is expected to provide added
assurance that the avocados marketed are of satisfactory maturity and
will ripen properly which is expected to further promote customer
satisfaction.
This rule is expected to similarly impact importers of avocados.
Non-exempt varieties of imported avocados have met the minimum weight
or diameter maturity requirements in past seasons, and this is expected
to continue. Thus, USDA believes this change will not limit the
quantity of imported avocados or place an undue burden on exporters, or
importers of avocados. The marketplace price and quality benefits
expected for Florida growers and handlers as a result of this rule will
also benefit exporters and importers of avocados.
As most handlers and importers are already reworking lots which
fail for maturity to remove undersized and underweight fruit, this
change is not expected to impact the total number of avocado shipments.
It is, however, expected to have a positive effect in the marketplace
by helping to ensure only mature avocados are reaching the market which
in turn should provide a strong price base for the industry.
This rule may impose some additional costs on producers, handlers,
and importers. However, the costs are expected to be minimal, and will
be offset by the benefits of this rule. This action benefits consumers,
producers, handlers, and importers by providing consumers with a
better, more mature piece of fruit. The costs and benefits of this rule
are not expected to be disproportionately greater or less significant
for small entities than for large entities.
One alternative to this action considered was to make no change.
However, the Committee believes this was not an acceptable alternative
as it could result in immature avocados reaching the fresh market. The
Committee agreed that allowing immature avocados to reach the fresh
market would be detrimental to the industry as a whole. Therefore, this
alternative was rejected.
This final rule revises the maturity requirements under the Florida
avocado marketing order. Accordingly, this action will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on either small or
large date handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
As noted in the initial regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA has
not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or
conflict with this final rule. Further, the public comment received
concerning the proposal did not address the initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized
throughout the avocado industry and all interested persons were invited
to attend the meeting and participate in Committee deliberations. Like
all Committee meetings, the meeting where this action was recommended
was a public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able
to express views on this issue.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on December 10, 2007 (72 FR 69624). Copies of the rule were
mailed or sent via facsimile to all Committee members and avocado
handlers. Finally, the rule was made available through the Internet by
USDA and the Office of the Federal Register. A 60-day comment period
ending February 8, 2008, was provided to allow interested persons to
respond to the proposal.
One comment was received during the comment period in response to
the proposal. The commenter was in favor of the proposal. The commenter
stated that they handle both imported and domestically grown avocados.
The commenter stated that if fruit is picked in an immature state prior
to the date stated on the maturity schedule, the fruit will never
ripen. The commenter stated support for the proposed rule because this
rule closes a loophole in the system that could allow immature avocados
to enter the market.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
In accordance with section 8e of the Act, the United States Trade
Representative has concurred with the issuance of this rule.
After consideration of all relevant matter presented, including the
information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
It is further found that good cause exists for not postponing the
effective date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register (5 U.S.C. 553) because this rule needs to be in place
prior to the start of the 2008-09 season. Further, handlers are aware
of this rule, which was recommended at a public meeting. Also, a 60-day
[[Page 26945]]
comment period was provided for in the proposed rule.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 915
Avocados, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
7 CFR Part 944
Avocados, Food grades and standards, Grapefruit, Grapes, Imports,
Kiwifruit, Limes, Olives, Oranges.
0
For the reasons set forth above, 7 CFR parts 915 and 944 are amended as
follows:
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR parts 915 and 944 continues to read
as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
PART 915--AVOCADOS GROWN IN SOUTH FLORIDA
0
2. A new paragraph (a)(3) is added to Sec. 915.332 to read as follows:
Sec. 915.332 Florida avocado maturity regulation.
(a) * * *
(3) Avocados which fail to meet the maturity requirements specified
in this section must be maintained under the supervision of the Federal
or Federal-State Inspection Service using the Positive Lot
Identification program, and when presented for reinspection, must meet
the maturity requirements which correspond to the date of the original
inspection.
* * * * *
PART 944--FRUITS; IMPORT REGULATIONS
0
3. A new paragraph (a)(3) is added to Sec. 944.31 to read as follows:
Sec. 944.31 Avocado import maturity regulation.
(a) * * *
(3) Avocados which fail to meet the maturity requirements specified
in this section must be maintained under the supervision of the Federal
or Federal-State Inspection Service using the Positive Lot
Identification program, and when presented for reinspection, must meet
the maturity requirements which correspond to the date of the original
inspection.
* * * * *
Dated: May 6, 2008.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E8-10462 Filed 5-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P