Proposed Personnel Demonstration Project; Alternative Personnel Management System for the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, 26436-26451 [E8-10440]
Download as PDF
26436
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
complete. The annual estimated burden
is 250 hours.
For copies of this proposal, contact
Mary Beth Smith-Toomey on (202) 606–
8358, FAX (202) 418–3251 or via E-mail
to MaryBeth.Smith-Toomey@opm.gov.
Please include a mailing address with
your request.
BILLING CODE 3190–W8–P
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
Comments on this proposal
should be received within 30 calendar
days from the date of this publication.
DATES:
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request for Extension,
Without Change, of a Currently
Approved Information Collection: RI
38–45
ADDRESSES:
Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Notice.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(Public Law 104–13, May 22, 1995), this
notice announces that the Office of
Personnel Management (OPM) has
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) a request for
extension, without change, of a
currently approved information
collection. RI 38–45, We Need the
Social Security Number of the Person
Named Below, is used by the Civil
Service Retirement System and the
Federal Employees Retirement System
to identify the records of individuals
with similar or the same names. It is
also needed to report payments to the
Internal Revenue Service.
Approximately 3,000 RI 38–45 forms
will be completed annually. Each form
requires approximately 5 minutes to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
Send or deliver comments
to—
Ronald W. Melton,
Deputy Assistant Director,
Retirement Services Program,
Center for Retirement and Insurance
Services,
U.S. Office of Personnel Management,
1900 E Street, NW., Room 3305,
Washington, DC 20415–3500;
and
Brenda Aguilar,
OPM Desk Officer,
Office of Information & Regulatory
Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget,
New Executive Office Building, NW.,
Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503.
For Information Regarding
Administrative Coordination—Contact:
Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader,
Publications Team, RIS Support
Services/Support Group, (202) 606–
0623.
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Office of Personnel Management.
Howard Weizmann,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. E8–10356 Filed 5–8–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–38–P
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
Proposed Personnel Demonstration
Project; Alternative Personnel
Management System for the U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Food Safety
and Inspection Service
U.S. Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Notice of a proposed
demonstration project plan.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Chapter 47 of title 5, United
States Code, authorizes the U.S. Office
of Personnel Management (OPM),
directly or in agreement with one or
more agencies, to conduct
demonstration projects that experiment
with new and different human resources
management concepts to determine
whether changes in human resources
policy or procedures result in improved
Federal human resources management.
The Food Safety and Inspection Service
(FSIS), the United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA), and OPM propose
to test a results-based, competencylinked pay-for-performance system that
is combined with a simplified, pay
banding classification and
compensation system. Section 4703 of
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
EN09MY08.077
Susan C. Schwab,
U.S. Trade Representative.
[FR Doc. E8–10350 Filed 5–8–08; 8:45 am]
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
title 5 requires OPM to publish the
proposed project plan in the Federal
Register. This notice fulfills that
requirement.
DATES: To be considered, written
comments must be submitted on or
before June 9, 2008. A public hearing
will be held on the proposed project
plan on Thursday, June 26, 2008, and
will begin at 10 a.m., Eastern Standard
Time. The location of the hearing is:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, South
Building, 1400 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20250. You must
use the 7th wing entrance which is
accessible from Independence Avenue.
Public parking is limited, but the
building is conveniently accessible to
the ‘‘Smithsonian’’ Metro stations. The
South Building is a secure facility.
Members of the public must show a
government-issued photo ID (e.g. State
driver’s license). Attendees will undergo
electronic screening, and their personal
belongings will be subject to a physical
search. Personal items prohibited in the
South Building include devices that can
transmit and record, weapons (guns,
knives, explosives, etc.), and alcohol. A
member of the public possessing such
items will be barred from entering, and
such items are subject to confiscation.
There will be a sign-in table set up in
the lobby of the Jefferson Auditorium. A
greeter and signs will direct attendees to
the auditorium location.
There will be a telephone call-in
number for members of the public and
agency who cannot attend in person.
That number will be 888–790–4330
(Passcode: Demonstration Project), and
the line will be active from 10 a.m.
Eastern Standard Time until the
conclusion of the hearing.
At the time of the hearing, interested
persons or organizations may present
their written or oral comments on the
proposed demonstration project. The
hearing will be informal. However,
anyone wishing to testify should contact
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT, so that FSIS,
USDA, and OPM can plan the hearing
and provide sufficient lead time for all
interested persons and organizations to
be heard. Priority will be given to those
on the schedule, with others speaking in
any remaining available time. Each
speaker’s presentation will be limited to
five minutes. Written comments may be
submitted to supplement oral testimony
during the public comment period.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to
Demonstration Projects, U.S. Office of
Personnel Management, 1900 E Street,
NW., Room 7677, Washington, DC
20415 or submitted by e-mail to
Demoprojects@opm.gov.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
(1)
FSIS, Laurie Lindsay, Director, HR
Demonstration Project Staff, (202) 720–
7983, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Room 2134 South Building, Washington
D.C, 20250; (2) Office of Personnel
Management, Patsy Stevens, Systems
Innovation Group Manager, (202) 606–
1574, U.S. Office of Personnel
Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room
7456, Washington, DC 20415.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The goals
of this demonstration project are to
improve workforce performance and
promote mission accomplishment by
making employees’ pay increases more
performance-sensitive, so that only
Fully Successful and higher performers
will receive any pay adjustments and
the best performers will receive the
largest pay adjustments. This will
produce such measurable outcomes as
improving the quality of new hires,
increasing the proportion of agency
positions that remain filled, improving
supervisors’ and employees’
commitment to a highly effective
performance culture, retaining good
performers, making line managers more
responsible and accountable for human
resources management, improving the
effectiveness and efficiency of human
resources systems, and closing human
capital gaps for supervisory and
mission-critical occupations (e.g., the
gap between the number of employees
required at each competency
proficiency level to perform current and
future missions and the number of
existing employees at those levels).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Linda M. Springer,
Director.
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary
II. Introduction
A. Purpose
B. Problems with the Present System
C. Changes Required/Expected Benefits
D. Participating Organizations
E. Participating Employees
F. Labor Participation
G. Project Design
III. Personnel System Changes
A. Pay Banding Classification and Pay
System
1. Establishment of Career Paths and Pay
Bands
2. Position Classification
3. Delegation of Classification Authority
4. Classification Appeals
5. Elimination of Fixed Steps
6. Rate Range
7. Locality Pay
8. Rate of Basic Pay Upon Initial
Appointment
9. Rate of Basic Pay Upon Promotion
10. Rate of Basic Pay in Noncompetitive
Lateral Actions
11. Other Pay Administration Provisions
12. Staffing Supplements
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26437
13. Status as GS Employees
B. Performance Appraisal System
1. Program Requirements
2. Supervisory Accountability
3. Reconsideration of Ratings
C. Performance-based Pay Increases and
Awards
1. Performance Shares
2. Performance Pay Pools
3. Performance-based Pay Increases
4. Employees Who Cannot Receive a
Performance Pay Increase
5. Performance Awards
D. Developmental Pay Increases
E. Staffing
1. Minimum Qualification Requirements
2. Flexible Pay Setting for New Hires
3. Promotions
F. Reduction-in-Force
IV. Training
V. Conversion
A. Conversion to the Demonstration Project
B. Conversion to the General Schedule
VI. Project Modification
VII. Project Duration
VIII. Project Evaluation
IX. Costs
A. Buy-in Costs
B. Recurring Costs
X. Waiver of Laws and Regulations Required
I. Executive Summary
This project was designed by the
United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA), including the Food Safety and
Inspection Service (FSIS), with
participation of and review by the U.S.
Office of Personnel Management (OPM).
The demonstration project will pursue
several key objectives: to simplify the
current classification system for greater
flexibility in classifying work and
paying employees; to reaffirm the
performance management and rewards
system for improving individual and
organizational performance; to assure
that the allocation of annual pay
increases reflects distinctions in levels
of performance in a meaningful way;
and to test the effectiveness of multigrade pay bands in recruiting,
advancing and retaining employees. The
duration of the project will be 5 years,
except that the project may be extended
by OPM if further testing and evaluation
are warranted.
The proposed project will test
whether a results-based, competencylinked pay-for-performance system can
be successful in USDA. Previous
alternative pay systems that used
competency models (e.g., the
Government Accountability Office
(GAO) compensation system and the
Department of Defense (DOD)
Acquisition Workforce Demonstration
Project) did not focus on missions or
occupations related to public health or
food defense. Moreover, the workforce
covered by the proposed demonstration
project is predominantly supervisory
(about 40%), and it is important to
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
26438
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
establish effective pay-for-performance
policies and procedures for supervisory
positions before extending such systems
to large numbers of line worker
positions throughout the Federal
Government. Finally, a substantial
number of the covered employees
(approximately 30 percent) have
working conditions that are
dramatically different from other whitecollar workers (e.g., shift-oriented work
in slaughter or meat processing
facilities), including the requirement for
substantial amounts of regularlyscheduled and intermittent overtime.
II. Introduction
A. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed project
is to strengthen the contribution of
human resources management in
helping to achieve the missions of the
specific program areas of FSIS. The
proposed project will test whether a
results-based, competency-linked, payfor-performance system and related
innovations will produce successful
results in a public health regulatory
environment with distinct working
conditions and an ever-present concern
for food defense and security.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
B. Problems with the Present System
The USDA Strategic Human Capital
Plan and the President’s Management
Agenda require FSIS to manage human
capital in the 21st century very
aggressively. FSIS must achieve
comprehensive human capital goals for
strategic workforce planning, learning
and workforce development,
recruitment and retention, and
evolution of a highly effective
performance culture.
The FSIS Strategic Plan calls for
continued transformation of the existing
workforce, which was recruited and
trained during a time when food safety
was considered a conventional
inspection program governed by
legislation such as the Federal Meat
Inspection Act of 1906, the Poultry
Products Inspection Act of 1957, the
Wholesome Meat Act of 1967, the
Wholesome Poultry Products Inspection
Act of 1968, and the Egg Products
Inspection Act of 1970. This legislation
was enacted when food industry
practices were characterized by carcassby-carcass organoleptic inspection. To
carry out its public health regulatory
missions today, FSIS must assure
science-based development and
execution of policy and must also
emphasize risk-oriented assessment,
planning, analysis, inspection, and
management activities. Also, FSIS must
recruit, develop, retain, and accomplish
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
life-cycle management for a workforce
that is educated and skilled in public
health, food defense, food safety, public
education, and emergency-response
systems, programs, practices, and
technologies. In addition to inspecting
poultry and meat animals, poultry and
meat products, and egg products, FSIS
must accomplish a growing list of
advanced public health functions to
include conducting risk assessments to
identify and evaluate the potential
human health outcomes from the
consumption of meat, poultry, and egg
products.
At best, the personnel system that
currently covers USDA and FSIS
employees is based on 20th century
assumptions about the nature of public
service. Although the current Federal
personnel management system is based
on important core principles, those
principles operate in an inflexible, onesize-fits-all system of defining work,
hiring staff, managing people, assessing
and rewarding performance, and
advancing personnel. These inherent
weaknesses make support of the FSIS
mission complex, costly, and,
ultimately, risky from the standpoint of
public health. Currently, pay and the
movement of personnel are pegged to
outdated, narrowly-defined work
definitions, hiring processes are
cumbersome, and high performers and
low performers are generally paid alike.
These systemic inefficiencies detract
from the potential effectiveness of the
public health workforce.
The challenges facing USDA and FSIS
today to assure and improve the public
health from farm to table require a
workforce transformation. FSIS
employees are being asked to assume
new and different responsibilities, take
more initiative, and be more innovative,
agile, and accountable than ever before.
It is critical that USDA and FSIS
support the entire public health
workforce with modern systems,
particularly a human resources
management system that supports and
protects their critical role in public
health, food safety, and food security.
C. Changes Required/Expected Benefits
The innovations of the project and
their objectives are summarized below.
1. Pay Banding and Classification
Occupational groups will be placed in
appropriate career paths, pay bands will
replace grades, and agency pay band
standards will replace OPM position
classification standards. The
classification system will be automated
as much as possible through intranetbased classification tools, and authority
will be delegated to line managers (at
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
least one level below the Deputy
Assistant Administrator level).
These changes are intended to
simplify and speed up the classification
process, make the process more
serviceable and understandable,
improve the effectiveness of
classification decision-making and
accountability, and facilitate pay for
performance.
Pay bands, which generally
correspond to multiple grade levels,
provide larger classification targets that
can be defined by shorter, simpler, and
more understandable classification
standards. This simpler system will be
easier to automate, will require fewer
resources to operate, and will facilitate
delegation to line managers.
By providing broader and more
flexible pay ranges for setting entry pay,
pay banding will provide hiring officials
with an important tool for attracting
high-quality candidates and thus
contribute to the objective of increasing
the quality of new hires.
By providing more flexible pay
progression based on performance, pay
banding will give managers the ability
to increase the pay of good performers
to higher and more competitive levels,
thus improving the retention of good
performers. At the same time, the
potential for higher pay increases for
good performance, supported by the
broader pay ranges of a pay banding
system, will contribute to the objective
of improving organizational and
individual performance.
2. Staffing
Additional staffing tools will include
such elements as flexible entry salaries,
staffing supplements for employees in
the applicable special rate categories,
developmental pay increases, and more
flexible pay increases associated with
promotion.
These changes are intended to attract
high-quality candidates and increase the
retention of good performers. Flexible
pay-setting for new hires is a recruiting
tool that gives hiring officials greater
flexibility to offer more competitive
salaries to high-quality candidates,
addressing the objective of improving
the quality of new hires. This will be
used in conjunction with existing
recruitment and retention incentives
under title 5.
3. Pay
The most important change in pay
administration is the introduction of a
pay-for-performance system. The payfor-performance system will support
several objectives. It will strengthen the
organization’s performance culture. It
will promote fairness through the
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
results-based, competency-linked,
performance rating process. It will
provide a motivational tool as well as a
retention tool. As a motivational tool,
the promise of higher pay increases for
good performance encourages high
achievement. As a retention tool, a payfor-performance system allows the
organization to quickly move the
salaries of good performers to levels that
are more competitive in the labor
market. The promise of higher pay
increases for good performance will
encourage achievement and promote the
objective of improved individual and
organizational performance.
Under the proposed pay-forperformance system, employee
performance ratings will govern
individual pay progression within pay
bands. Any general increase in GS rates
of basic pay approved by Congress and
the President will be applied only to the
FSIS band ranges (i.e., band minimums
and maximums). Demonstration project
employees will receive pay increases
based on their rating of record. Funds
currently applied to within-grade
increases, quality step increases, and the
annual GS pay adjustment will be used
to grant these performance-based pay
increases. Employees rated below Fully
Successful will not receive any basic
pay increase, nor will they receive pay
increases when locality pay percentages
are increased. (See section III.C.)
In addition, employees in
developmental positions may receive
additional pay increases. Funds used for
career ladder promotions from one
grade to a higher grade will initially be
used to fund these developmental pay
increases. These pay increases may be
granted to an employee to recognize the
faster progression that can occur in a
developmental position. This pay
flexibility addresses the objective of
improving retention by raising the pay
of high-performing employees while
also supporting the objective of
preserving merit system principles (e.g.,
equal pay for work of equal value). (See
section III.D.)
4. Performance Appraisal
The demonstration project will
continue to use the current FSIS
appraisal program including the current
five-level rating process, which
incorporates competencies into the
performance standards. (The five-level
rating system has the following levels:
1—Unacceptable, 2—Marginal, 3—Fully
Successful, 4—Superior, and 5—
Outstanding.) The performance
appraisal process is intended to (1)
promote good performance; (2)
encourage a continuing dialogue
between supervisors and employees on
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
26439
organizational objectives, supervisory
expectations, employee performance,
employee needs for assistance and
guidance, and employee development;
and (3) provide a basis for performancerelated decisions in employee
development, pay, rewards, assignment,
promotion, and retention. The program
will more effectively communicate to
employees how they are performing, the
rewards of good performance, and the
consequences of poor performance.
human resources management by
strengthening the role of line managers
as the human resources managers of
their units. The project will be managed
by the FSIS Demonstration Project
Management Board (DPMB), composed
of representatives from each operating
unit (program area) and chaired by the
Assistant Administrator for the Office of
Management.
5. Pay for Performance
The most important feature of the
demonstration project is that it links the
employee’s rating of record to shares of
a performance pay pool. Performancebased pay increases give an operating
unit the ability to raise the pay of good
performers more rapidly, thus
improving retention of good performers.
Performance pay is distributed to
employees either in the form of
increases in base pay or, when the
employee reaches a band maximum (or
is on retained pay), in the form of a
performance bonus. The number and
type of performance pay pools will be
described in implementing guidance,
but performance ratings will be linked
to performance pay shares so that
employees who earn a level five rating
(the highest) will earn the greatest
number of performance pay shares,
employees who earn a level four rating
will earn a smaller number of shares,
and employees who earn a level three
rating will earn the fewest number of
performance shares. Employees rated
below level three will not be eligible for
performance pay increases.
The Department proposes that FSIS be
the only agency participating in this
project. The Department and FSIS have
determined that employees in all
program areas in the agency, including
headquarters and field employees, will
participate, except that all bargainingunit members will be excluded.
Including all bargaining unit members
would cause the project to exceed the
5,000 limit on the number of
participating employees. Included in the
project are all non bargaining-unit
employees located in meat and poultry
plants throughout the United States
(excluding intermittent food inspection
personnel (GS–1863) appointed under
Schedule A 213.3113(1)(3) and
Schedule C employees), 15 District
Offices, 3 Field Laboratories, a
Technical Service Center in Omaha NE,
a Financial Processing Center in Des
Moines IA, a Human Resources Field
Office in Minneapolis MN, as well as all
Headquarters program offices. Each of
these units is committed to operating a
credible, robust performance appraisal
program aligned to the organization’s
strategic goals and objectives. These
organizations have demonstrated this
commitment the past two years, as FSIS
implemented a comprehensive
performance management training
program within the agency.
6. Performance Awards
Existing programs for both nonmonetary and monetary recognition will
remain under the plan in accordance
with chapter 45 of title 5, United States
Code.
Awards address two objectives. First,
rewarding achievement will make high
achievers more likely to remain, thus
improving retention of the best
performers. Second, the potential for
awards for achievement will encourage
improved individual performance.
Although FSIS is not testing any new
procedures under the demonstration
project authority in chapter 47 of title 5,
awards are a key part of a performance
pay system and therefore noted here to
clarify their use and provide a full
picture of the project plan.
7. Line Management Authority
The program areas will delegate
greater authority and accountability to
line managers. This delegation is
intended to improve the effectiveness of
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
D. Participating Organizations
E. Participating Employees
The demonstration project covers all
General Schedule employees (with pay
plan codes GS and GM) in nonbargaining unit positions. The excluded
bargaining unit positions are
nonsupervisory positions in the food
technology (GS–1382), food inspection
(GS–1863), and consumer safety
inspection (GS–1862) series and nonbargaining food inspection (GS–1863)
employees appointed under Schedule A
213.3113(1)(3).
Also excluded from coverage of this
project are all Senior Executive Service
(SES), Senior Level (SL), and Federal
Wage System (WG) employees, and all
Schedule C employees.
Table 1 shows the number of
employees subject to coverage under
this project by occupational series and
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
26440
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
grade. The OPM occupational series will
be retained for all covered positions.
TABLE 1.—COVERED EMPLOYEES, BY SERIES AND GRADE (AS OF 01/08/08)
Series
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
3
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
3
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
5
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
14
5
..........
14
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
2
..........
..........
1
..........
2
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
2
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
6
..........
..........
..........
9
1
4
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
1
..........
22
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
5
..........
..........
..........
4
..........
16
9
5
..........
..........
..........
..........
4
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
6
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
17
..........
1
1
12
..........
37
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
1
35
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
8
..........
..........
..........
2
5
..........
3
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
2
..........
..........
19
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
8
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
3
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
15
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
10
..........
3
2
46
1
..........
4
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
16
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
6
11
..........
..........
..........
5
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
3
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
6
2
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
115
..........
..........
..........
..........
2
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
4
..........
1
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
15
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
2
2
..........
..........
..........
4
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
14
..........
74
1
..........
3
2
1
..........
..........
..........
2
5
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
41
..........
..........
..........
..........
3
..........
2
..........
4
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
26
..........
1
..........
23
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
34
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
30
..........
1
..........
..........
2
..........
8
..........
5
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
161
..........
678
..........
..........
5
..........
..........
..........
3
..........
..........
33
..........
7
..........
1
..........
1
..........
..........
71
6
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
34
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
41
..........
8
..........
20
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
1
52
..........
..........
1
..........
4
35
..........
..........
2
..........
6
..........
10
..........
3
..........
..........
6
..........
1
83
..........
184
..........
1
7
..........
..........
3
3
2
..........
20
8
1
3
1
2
1
1
..........
30
2
..........
4
..........
2
..........
30
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
4
..........
21
..........
4
..........
19
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
35
..........
1
32
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
16
..........
..........
1
..........
6
..........
3
..........
3
..........
..........
6
1
..........
2
..........
25
..........
1
1
..........
..........
1
2
2
..........
6
3
1
2
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
16
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
18
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
4
..........
1
..........
11
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
28
..........
..........
14
..........
..........
..........
..........
2
2
..........
..........
..........
..........
3
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
6
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
1
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
2
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
3
..........
5
1
1
1
5
1
106
28
18
3
122
46
7
69
24
7
63
2
3
164
40
2
2
1
7
91
30
1
3
4
28
38
21
3
13
1
1
13
1
2
265
2
967
20
2
18
2
1
5
9
4
11
66
11
10
5
2
3
3
1
2
162
9
130
5
2
5
1
89
1
Total ...........................
3
2
10
47
56
44
148
27
238
2
180
1,137
581
236
80
2,791
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
0018
0080
0099
0101
0110
0199
0201
0203
0260
0299
0301
0303
0305
0318
0326
0335
0340
0341
0342
0343
0344
0361
0391
0399
0401
0403
0404
0414
0415
0499
0501
0503
0510
0544
0560
0561
0599
0601
0602
0690
0696
0699
0701
0799
0896
1035
1071
1084
1101
1102
1301
1311
1320
1382
1412
1501
1515
1529
1654
1701
1702
1801
1810
1862
1863
1899
2001
2005
2210
2299
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
Total
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
F. Labor Participation
No bargaining-unit employees are
covered in this project.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
G. Project Design
The project methodology is to
introduce into all FSIS program areas
(for covered positions) certain
innovations in human resources
management, and to evaluate over time
the effects of those innovations on the
ability of the program areas to manage
their human resources. The
methodology includes the following
steps:
1. Selection of Innovations: The
Department and FSIS have determined
that particular pay banding and
performance-based pay progression
innovations that are linked to a
framework of core competencies should
be included in the proposed project.
These innovations, and the procedures
associated with them, are described
below under Pay Banding Classification
and Pay System, Performance Appraisal
System, Performance-based Pay
Increases and Awards, Developmental
Pay Increases, Staffing and Reductionin-Force (See Section III, A through F).
2. Selection of Program Areas: The
Department and FSIS have selected all
program areas of the agency for
inclusion in the project since the total
number of non-bargaining unit
employees is approximately 2,900 (parttime, full-time, and intermittent) and
falls within the maximum of 5,000
allowed for a demonstration project.
3. Goals and Objectives: The specific
project objectives are listed under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION and
Executive Summary and are directly
related to the issues identified under
Section II.B, Problems with the Present
System.
4. Partnership: The Department and
FSIS have limited the covered
workforce to non-bargaining unit
positions. Therefore, input from labor
representatives is not required.
However, consistent with the policy of
the agency Administrator, FSIS will
seek input from two employee
associations whose membership
overlaps with the covered workforce.
5. Baseline Evaluation: To provide a
basis of comparison between employee
opinions of the current system and their
future opinions of the project system,
each employee in the covered program
areas will be asked to complete an
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
opinion questionnaire comparable to the
Federal Human Capital Survey prior to
implementation of the project. To
establish a baseline for cost analysis,
each operating unit will be required to
analyze its personnel costs during fiscal
years 2005, 2006, and 2007.
6. Training: The agency and the
program areas will provide training to
managers, employees, and human
resources staff prior to implementation
of the project and will provide
additional training to managers on the
pay-for-performance system prior to the
end of the first performance cycle. (See
Section IV, Training.)
7. Implementation: To ensure a
smooth implementation, the agency will
emphasize top management support; the
development of detailed operating
procedures and implementing directives
prior to implementation; thorough
training of managers, employees and
human resources staff; step-by-step
implementation planning; adequate
backup systems, particularly in
automated personnel and payroll
systems; and sufficient operating
resources.
8. Program Evaluation: The
Department and FSIS will arrange for
periodic evaluation of the project under
an OPM-approved evaluation plan. (See
Section VIII, Project Evaluation.) The
evaluation will be designed to
determine whether the innovations are
achieving project goals and objectives
and are operating within acceptable cost
limits. (See Section IX, Costs.)
III. Personnel System Changes
A. Pay Banding Classification and Pay
System
1. Establishment of Career Paths and
Pay Bands
In coordination with OPM, FSIS may
establish, and adjust over time, career
paths that group one or more
occupational categories together and
provide a common pay banding
structure ( i.e., a set of work levels and
rate ranges) for occupations within a
given career path. Initially, FSIS intends
to establish four career paths as follows:
(a) Professional, Scientific, and
Administrative [AP]: Policy, staff, line,
supervisory, and managerial positions
in science, veterinary medicine,
consumer safety, food technology,
mathematics, accounting, and other
comparable occupations with a positive
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26441
education requirement. Examples of
occupational series are 0403Microbiology, 0510-Accounting, 0696Consumer Safety, 0701-Veterinary
Medical Science, and 1301-General
Physical Science. In addition, this
career path will include policy, staff,
line, supervisory, and managerial
positions in such fields as finance,
procurement, human resources
management, public information,
management and program analysis,
compliance investigation, and other
two-grade interval occupations that do
not maintain a positive education
requirement. Examples of these
occupational series are 0201-Human
Resources Management, 0343Management and Program Analysis,
1035-Public Affairs.
(b) Supervisory Inspection [AI]:
Supervisory positions that direct the
work of inspectors at an import
warehouse, a plant, or in a circuit of
plants within a geographic area. These
positions are 1862-Supervisory
Consumer Safety Inspectors.
(c) Scientific and Technical Support
[AS]: Line positions, predominantly in
agency laboratories, which support
professional and scientific operations.
Examples include 0404-Biological
Science Technician, 1311-Physical
Science Technician and similar
traditional one-grade interval technician
support occupations in agency
laboratories.
(d) Management Support [AO]:
Nonsupervisory and supervisory clerical
and assistant positions that support
positions not fitting the definition of
any other career paths. Examples
include 203-Human Resources
Assistant, 318-Secretary, 326-Office
Automation Assistant, 344-Management
Assistant and similar traditional onegrade interval technician and
administrative support occupations.
Each career path will be subdivided
into pay bands. Each pay band will
correspond to one or more GS grades.
Pay bands provide larger classification
targets that can be defined by shorter,
simpler and more understandable
classification standards. In coordination
with OPM, FSIS may establish, and
adjust over time, a career path’s pay
band structure. Initially, the pay bands
within each career path and their
relationship to GS grades will be as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
26442
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
TABLE 2.—SAMPLE PAY BANDS UNDER PHHRS
Career path
Pay band 1
Pay band 2
Administrative, Professional, and
Scientific (AP).
GS–1/4 (Student Trainee).
GS–5/7 Trainee
Supervisory Inspection (AI) ...........
..........................
..........................
Scientific & Technical (AS) ...........
GS–1/4 (Aide) ..
GS–5/6/7 Entry
Management Support (AO) ...........
GS–1/4 Clerical
(Entry).
GS–5/6/7 Assistant or
Clerical Supervisor.
Pay band 3
Pay band 4
Pay band 5
Pay band 6
GS–9/11 Intermediate.
GS–12/13 * Full
Performance.
GS–14 Expert ..
Pay Band 5S
GS–13/14 Supervisor.
GS–15 Senior
Expert
Pay Band 6S
GS–15 Manager
GS–8/9 Supervisory Inspectors.
GS–8/9 Independent.
GS–10/11 Senior Supervisors.
GS–10/11 Expert & Supervisory.
GS–8/9/10 Senior or Lead
Assistant, and
Supervisor.
* Also includes supervisory positions where the band-controlling work is actually personally performed non-supervisory work.
The final pay banding architecture
will be described in implementing
guidance. FSIS will coordinate changes
in career paths or pay banding
structures with OPM. After coordination
with OPM, FSIS will give affected
employees advance notice and an
opportunity to comment before effecting
a change with respect to career paths or
pay banding structure.
2. Position Classification
Occupational groups will be placed in
career paths, pay bands will replace
grades, and FSIS pay band standards
will replace OPM position classification
standards. The General Schedule
occupational series will be retained.
Each classification standard will
describe the threshold of work
encompassed by each pay band based
on general duties and responsibilities,
knowledge, skills, and abilities. FSIS
will establish classification standards in
consultation with OPM. Positions must
meet or exceed the threshold to be
classified into a pay band. These bases
complement each other at each pay
band in a career path and may not be
separated in classifying a position. OPM
classification standards will not be used
directly, but may be used indirectly to
establish competency criteria that
distinguish pay bands or pay levels
within a key career path.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
3. Delegation of Classification Authority
The agency has delegated
classification authority to SES and GS–
15 executives and managers since July
2004. The delegated classification
authority (DCA) provisions of this
project continue this initiative and
increase the number of managers who
receive classification authority.
Managers must successfully complete
DCA training before classification
authority may be exercised. The
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
delegation of classification authority
will be facilitated by the expansion of
an intranet-based Position Description
Library, which will include standard
descriptions of all key positions in all
career paths and pay bands. Line
managers will utilize this intranet-based
Position Description Library to select or
classify most positions. These changes
are intended to simplify and speed up
the classification process, make the
process more serviceable and
understandable, improve the
effectiveness of classification decisionmaking and accountability, and
facilitate pay for performance.
Implementing guidance will describe
the modified DCA policies and
procedures.
4. Classification Appeals
An employee covered by the FSIS
Demonstration Project may appeal the
occupational series, official title, or pay
band of his or her position at any time
to the agency, Department or directly to
the Office of Personnel Management
consistent with procedures currently
prescribed under 5 CFR part 511,
subpart F. Implementing guidance will
describe the classification appeals
process.
5. Elimination of Fixed Steps
Employees will be converted from
existing 15-grade GS position
classification and pay system
established under 5 U.S.C. chapter 51
and chapter 53, subchapter III, to the
new pay banding system. The 10 fixed
steps of each GS grade will not apply to
employees participating in the
demonstration project. The fixed-step
system operates primarily to reward
longevity. A pay banding pay system is
an important element of any effort to
make pay more performance-sensitive.
No employee’s pay will be reduced as
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
a result of becoming covered by the
demonstration project. (See section
V.A.) However, demonstration project
employees will no longer receive
longevity-based, within-grade pay
increases at prescribed intervals.
Instead, they will be granted annual
performance increases and bonuses as
described in section III.C below.
6. Rate Range
The normal minimum and maximum
rates of the rate range for each pay band
will equal the applicable step 1 rate and
step 10 rate, respectively, for the lowest
and highest grades, respectively, in the
GS that are included in the pay band.
The normal minimum and maximum
rates of each band will be increased at
the time of a general pay increase under
5 U.S.C. 5303 so they equal the new
minimum and maximum rates of the
grades corresponding to the band.
The minimum rate of the pay band is
extended 5 percent below the normal
minimum for employees with a rating of
record below Fully Successful. Such an
employee’s rate may fall below the
normal pay band minimum when that
minimum increases as a result of a pay
band adjustment, but the employee
cannot receive a pay increase because
the employee’s rating of record is below
Fully Successful, as described in section
III.C.4.
The maximum rate of each pay band
is extended 5 percent above the normal
maximum for all employees with a
rating of record at the highest level
(currently called ‘‘Outstanding’’ in
FSIS). This feature will help to ensure
that the range of available pay rates will
be adequate to recognize truly
outstanding performance. The upper
range extension is reserved for
employees with an Outstanding rating.
If an employee in the upper range
extension is rated below the
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
8. Rate of Basic Pay Upon Initial
Appointment
7. Locality Pay
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Outstanding level, special provisions
apply, as described in section III.A.11.
Upon appointment to a demonstration
project position under Delegated
Examining, Direct-Hire Authorization or
other authority primarily designed for
initial entry into the Federal service
(e.g., Veterans Employment Opportunity
Act, 30% Disabled Veteran
Appointment), an appointee’s rate of
basic pay may be set at any rate within
the normal pay band range. In
exercising this flexibility, FSIS will
consider the appointee’s qualifications,
competing job offers, FSIS’s need for the
appointee’s talents, the appointee’s
potential contributions to FSIS mission
accomplishment, and the rates received
by on-board employees. This flexibility
will allow FSIS to compete more
effectively with private industry for the
best talent available. Implementing
guidance will provide managers with
assistance in setting pay to assure fair
and equitable treatment of a diverse
workforce.
Locality-based comparability
payments under 5 U.S.C. 5304 will be
paid on top of the rate of basic pay in
the same manner as those payments
apply to GS employees (except as
otherwise provided in this plan).
Staffing supplements may apply as
described in section III.A.12. When a
locality-based comparability payment
established under 5 U.S.C. 5304 is
increased, a demonstration project
employee whose most recent rating of
record is Fully Successful or higher is
entitled to the increased locality
payment.
A demonstration project employee
whose most recent rating of record is
below Fully Successful is entitled to the
increased locality payment, but his or
her underlying rate of basic pay will be
reduced in a manner that ensures the
employee’s total rate of pay does not
increase. This reduction is necessary to
ensure, in an administratively feasible
way, that an employee rated less than
Fully Successful will not receive a pay
increase. It does not constitute a
reduction in pay for purposes of
applying the adverse action procedures
in chapter 75 of title 5, United States
Code. (Exception: An employee’s rate of
basic pay may not be reduced under this
paragraph to the extent that the
reduction would cause an employee’s
rate to fall more than 5 percent below
the normal range minimum.)
A locality rate cap 5 percent higher
than the normal EX–IV cap is
established to accommodate those
Outstanding performers in the 5 percent
upper rate range extension. This higher
cap will apply only to employees
receiving a rate within the upper range
extension. If the locality rate for an
employee at the normal band maximum
is affected by the EX–IV cap, resulting
in an ‘‘effective locality pay percentage’’
that is less than the regular locality pay
percentage, the locality rate for an
employee in the upper rate range
extension of the same band will be
computed using that same effective
locality pay percentage. (For example, if
the regular locality pay percentage is 30
percent, but the EX–IV cap causes the
amount of locality pay actually received
by an employee at the normal band
maximum to be 20 percent, that
effective locality pay percentage of 20
percent would be used to compute
locality pay for an employee in the
upper range extension of the same
band.)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
9. Rate of Basic Pay Upon Promotion
Upon promotion to a higher pay band
within a career path or to a pay band in
another career path with a higher
maximum rate, an employee’s rate of
basic pay will be set at a rate within the
higher pay band that provides a pay
increase of 8 percent, unless a greater
increase is necessary to set pay at the
normal range minimum. (See section
III.E.3 for definition of ‘‘promotion.’’) In
consultation with OPM, FSIS may
establish exceptions to this policy to
deal with employees receiving a
retained rate, employees who are repromoted shortly after demotion,
employees with exceptional
performance warranting a larger
increase with higher-management
approval, etc. FSIS may adopt, in
consultation with OPM, policies
providing a promotion-equivalent
increase in appropriate circumstances to
a Federal employee outside the
demonstration project who accepts a
position covered by the demonstration
project.
10. Rate of Basic Pay in Noncompetitive
Lateral Actions
Upon non-competitive lateral
movement (e.g., via transfer or
reassignment, not conversion of
position) to a demonstration project
position from another Federal position,
an employee’s pay rate (including any
locality payment or staffing supplement)
will be set at an amount that is equal
(after any geographic pay conversion) to
the employee’s existing pay rate
(including any locality payment or
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26443
equivalent basic pay supplement),
subject to the applicable normal range
maximum. For such an employee
moving from a position outside the
demonstration project, FSIS may
provide an increase in the rate of basic
pay immediately after movement to
reflect the prorated value of the
employee’s next scheduled within-grade
increase under the former pay system,
consistent with the requirements in
section V.A.
11. Other Pay Administration Provisions
Annual performance-based pay
increases described in section III.C.3
will be made to the rate of basic pay.
These increases are scheduled to be
made on the same date that the annual
rate range adjustments normally take
effect—i.e., the first day of the first pay
period beginning on or after January 1.
To be eligible for an annual performance
pay increase an employee must have a
rating of record of Fully Successful or
higher.
Annual performance awards
described in section III.C.5. provide for
lump-sum cash payments recognizing
performance and will be made at the
same time as the annual performance
pay increase. To be eligible for a
performance award, an employee must
have a rating of record of Fully
Successful or higher.
Developmental pay increases
described in Section III.D may be paid
no more than once during any 52-week
period, following the mid-year progress
review.
The grade retention provisions in 5
U.S.C. 5362 and 5 CFR part 536 are not
applicable (i.e., no pay band retention).
The pay retention rules in 5 U.S.C. 5363
and 5 CFR part 536 apply to
demonstration project employees,
subject to the following exceptions:
(1) An employee with a rating of
record below Fully Successful may not
receive an increase in his or her retained
rate under the 50-percent adjustment
rule in 5 U.S.C. 5363(b)(2)(B);
(2) The cap on retained rates is equal
to the rate for level IV of the Executive
Schedule plus 5 percent (instead of the
EX–IV cap established in 5 CFR
536.306) in order to accommodate the
upper range extension;
(3) An employee in the upper range
extension who is rated below
Outstanding will be converted to a
retained rate before processing any other
pay action; and
(4) The range maximum rate used in
computing retained rate adjustments
under the 50-percent adjustment rule
will be the maximum rate of the highest
applicable rate range (including any
applicable locality payment or staffing
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
26444
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
supplement) taking into consideration
an employee’s rating of record. For
retained rate employees rated
Outstanding, the increase is 50 percent
of the dollar change in the applicable
adjusted rate for the upper range
extension maximum. (Note that an
employee rated Outstanding must have
a retained rate in excess of the upper
range extension maximum adjusted rate,
since he or she would otherwise be
converted to a rate within that range
extension.) For retained rate employees
rated below Outstanding, the increase is
50 percent of the dollar change in the
applicable adjusted rate for the normal
band maximum.
If an employee is receiving a retained
rate that is less than the applicable
adjusted maximum rate (including any
applicable locality payment or staffing
supplement) for the upper range
extension for the employee’s band, and
if that employee receives a rating of
record of Outstanding, the employee’s
retained rate will be terminated and
converted to an equal adjusted rate (base
rate in upper range extension plus
applicable locality payment or staffing
supplement). This conversion must be
processed before any other pay
adjustment.
For a retained rate employee with a
rating of record of Outstanding, if a
retained rate increase provided at the
time of a range adjustment results in the
retained rate falling below the
applicable adjusted rate for the upper
range extension maximum, the
employee’s retained rate will be
terminated, and the employee’s pay will
be set at the maximum rate of the upper
range extension.
For a retained rate employee with a
rating of record of Fully Successful or
Superior, if a retained rate adjustment
provided at the time of a range
adjustment results in the retained rate
falling below the applicable adjusted
rate for the normal band maximum, the
employee’s retained rate will be
terminated, and the employee’s pay will
be set at the normal band maximum
rate.
For a retained rate employee with a
rating of record below Fully Successful,
the retained rate is frozen and not
subject to adjustment. When such an
employee’s retained rate falls below the
applicable adjusted rate for the normal
band maximum, the employee’s
retained rate will be terminated, and the
employee’s pay will be set at an
adjusted rate equal to the retained rate
(i.e., the rate is not set at the range
maximum).
As required by 5 CFR 536.304(a)(2)
and 536.305(a)(2), any general pay
adjustment, including a retained rate
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
adjustment as described in the
preceding paragraphs, must be
processed before any other
simultaneous pay action (such as a
geographic pay conversion).
When applicable, the saved pay rules
in 5 U.S.C. 3594 and 5 CFR 359.705 for
former SES members continue to apply
to demonstration project employees,
except that (1) an employee with a
rating of record below Fully Successful
may not receive an increase in his or her
saved rate under 5 U.S.C. 3594(c)(2);
and (2) the 50-percent adjustment rule
must be applied in the same manner as
it is applied for a retained rate under 5
U.S.C. 5363, subject to the modifications
described in the preceding paragraphs.
The rules regarding termination of a
saved rate when it falls below the
applicable adjusted maximum rate must
be parallel to those governing
termination of a retained rate under 5
U.S.C. 5363, subject to the modifications
described in the preceding paragraphs.
FSIS may adopt supplemental pay
administration policies governing
matters not specifically addressed in
this plan, subject to any OPM guidance.
In addressing geographic conversions
and simultaneous pay actions, such
rules must be consistent with 5 CFR
531.205 and 5 CFR 531.206,
respectively.
12. Staffing Supplements
An employee who is assigned to an
occupational series and geographic area
covered by an OPM-established special
rates schedule, and who meets any other
applicable coverage requirements, will
be entitled to a staffing supplement if
the maximum adjusted rate for a
covered position in the GS grades
corresponding to the employee’s band is
a special rate that exceeds the
applicable maximum GS locality rate.
The staffing supplement is added on top
of the rate of basic pay in the same
manner as locality pay. An employee
will receive the higher of the applicable
locality payment or staffing supplement.
For employees being converted into
the demonstration project, the
employee’s total pay immediately after
conversion will be the same as
immediately before, but a portion of the
total will be in the form of a staffing
supplement. Adverse action and pay
retention provisions will not apply to
the conversion process as there will be
no change in the total salary rate. The
staffing supplement is calculated as
described below.
Upon conversion, the demonstration
base rate will be established by dividing
the employee’s former GS adjusted rate
(the higher of special rate or locality
rate) by the staffing factor. The staffing
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
factor will be determined by dividing
the maximum special rate for the
banded grades by the GS base rate
corresponding to that special rate (step
10 GS base rate for the same grade as the
special rate). The employee’s
demonstration staffing supplement is
derived by multiplying the
demonstration base rate by the staffing
factor minus one. Therefore, the
employee’s final demonstration special
staffing rate equals the demonstration
base rate plus the special staffing
supplement; this amount will equal the
employee’s former GS adjusted rate.
Simplified, the formula is this:
Staffing factor=(Maximum special rate
for banded grades)/(GS base rate
corresponding to that special rate)
Demonstration base rate=(Former GS
adjusted rate [special or locality
rate])/ (Staffing factor)
Staffing supplement=demonstration
base rate × (staffing factor¥1)
Salary upon conversion=demonstration
base rate + staffing supplement [sum
will equal existing rate]
If a special rate employee is converted
to a band where the maximum GS
adjusted rate for the banded grades is a
locality rate, when the employee is
converted into the demonstration
project, the demonstration base rate is
derived by dividing the employee’s
former special rate by the applicable
locality pay factor (for example, in the
Washington-Baltimore area, the locality
pay factor is 1.2089 in 2008). The
employee’s demonstration localityadjusted rate will equal the employee’s
former GS adjusted rate.
Any GS or special rate schedule
adjustment will require recomputation
of the staffing supplement. Employees
receiving a staffing supplement remain
entitled to an underlying locality rate,
which may over time supersede the
need for a staffing supplement. If OPM
discontinues or decreases a special rate
schedule, pay retention provisions will
be applied, as appropriate. Upon
geographic movement, an employee
who receives the special staffing
supplement will have his or her
entitlement to a staffing supplement
redetermined; any resulting reduction in
the supplement will not be considered
an adverse action or a basis for pay
retention.
When a staffing supplement is
increased, a demonstration project
employee whose rating of record is
below Fully Successful is entitled to the
increased supplement, but his or her
underlying rate of basic pay will be
reduced in a manner that ensures the
employee’s total rate of pay does not
increase. Such a reduction does not
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
constitute a reduction in pay for
purposes of applying the adverse action
procedures in chapter 75 of title 5,
United States Code. (Exception: An
employee’s rate of basic pay may not be
reduced under this paragraph to the
extent that the reduction would cause
an employee’s rate to fall more than 5
percent below the normal range
minimum.)
Established salary including the
staffing supplement will be considered
basic pay for the same purposes as a
special rate under 5 CFR 530.308—e.g.,
for purposes of retirement, life
insurance, premium pay, severance pay,
and advances in pay. It will also be used
to compute workers’ compensation
payments and lump-sum payments for
accrued and accumulated annual leave.
Adjusted rates that include a staffing
supplement are subject to an Executive
Schedule Level IV (EX–IV) cap, except
that an adjusted rate cap 5 percent
higher than the EX–IV rate is
established exclusively for Outstandingrated employees in the upper range
extension. If the adjusted rate for an
employee at the normal band maximum
is affected by the EX–IV cap, resulting
in an ‘‘effective staffing supplement
percentage’’ that is less than the regular
staffing supplement percentage, the
adjusted rate for an employee in the
upper rate range extension of the same
band and in the same staffing
supplement category will be computed
using that same effective staffing
supplement percentage. (For example, if
the regular staffing supplement
percentage is 35 percent, but the EX–IV
cap causes the amount of the staffing
supplement actually received by an
employee at the normal band maximum
to be 20 percent, that effective staffing
supplement percentage of 20 percent
would be used to compute the staffing
supplement for an employee in the
upper range extension of the same
band.)
OPM may approve staffing
supplements for categories of employees
within the demonstration project who
are not in approved special rate
categories for GS employees, consistent
with the provisions in 5 U.S.C. 5305(a)
and (b).
13. Status as GS Employees
Notwithstanding the waiver of laws
governing the GS classification and pay
system, demonstration project
employees will be considered to be GS
employees in applying other laws,
regulations, and policies, except as
otherwise provided in this plan. For
example, demonstration project
employees will remain eligible for
locality pay under 5 U.S.C. 5304
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
(subject to exceptions described in this
plan), hazardous duty differentials
under 5 U.S.C. 5545(d), and
recruitment, relocation, and retention
incentives under 5 U.S.C. 5753–5754.
Demonstration project employees will
be covered by the regulations in 5 CFR
part 300, subpart F, except that ‘‘grade’’
will be replaced with ‘‘pay band.’’ (See
section III.E.3. for a 52-week time-inband requirement.) However, project
employees will not be covered by the
supervisory differential provision in 5
U.S.C. 5755.
A demonstration project employee
who converts from the project position
to a GS position without a break in
service will be considered a GS
employee for the purpose of applying
the GS promotion rule under 5 U.S.C.
5334(b). (See section V.B.)
B. Performance Appraisal System
FSIS will use its current performance
management program under the
Department of Agriculture appraisal
system that has been approved by OPM,
consistent with chapter 43 of title 5,
United States Code. Throughout the
duration of the demonstration project,
the effectiveness of performance
management within the project will be
monitored by examining metrics and
assessments that will be included in the
demonstration project evaluation plan.
1. Program Requirements
The FSIS performance appraisal
program requires written performance
plans for each covered employee
containing the employee’s performance
elements and standards. The
performance plan links the performance
elements and standards for individual
employees to the organization’s strategic
goals and objectives. Ongoing feedback
and dialogue between employees and
their supervisors regarding performance
is required. In addition, the program
provides for, at a minimum, one
midyear progress review.
The FSIS appraisal program,
including its performance levels and
standards, provides for making
meaningful distinctions in performance.
The program currently uses a five-level
summary rating pattern to summarize
performance and three levels to appraise
performance at the element level. Its
summary level pattern under 5 CFR
430.208(d) uses Pattern H with Levels 1,
2, 3, 4, and 5, which FSIS has labeled
Unacceptable, Marginal, Fully
Successful, Superior, and Outstanding,
respectively. Employees must be
covered by their performance plan for at
least 90 days before they can be
assigned a rating of record. Supervisors
and managers apply the appraisal
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26445
program in a way that makes
appropriate differentiations in
performance. These differentiations
reflect overall organizational
performance. Employees receive a
written performance appraisal (i.e., a
rating of record) annually. Forced
distributions of ratings are prohibited.
Each annual appraisal period will begin
on October 1 and end on the following
September 30. Performance appraisals
will be completed in a timely manner to
support pay decisions in accordance
with section III.C.
Additional guidance on the
performance appraisal program is
provided in current FSIS directives.
Performance appraisal is an
evolutionary process, and changes may
be made during the course of the
demonstration project based on findings
from our ongoing evaluations and
reviews. Any changes will be
communicated to affected employees,
and they will be given a chance to
comment before FSIS implements the
changes.
2. Supervisory Accountability
Supervisors are responsible for
providing appropriate consequences for
employee performance by addressing
poor performance and recognizing
exceptional performance. The
performance plans for supervisors and
managers include the degree to which
supervisors and managers plan, assess,
monitor, develop, correct, rate, and
reward subordinate employees’
performance. It is recognized that
specific training must be provided to
prepare supervisors and managers to
exercise these responsibilities. FSIS
understands that this demonstration
project will heighten the need for
continuing supervisory training to
support the accurate and realistic
appraisal of performance.
3. Reconsideration of Ratings
To support fairness and transparency
for the program and its consequences,
employees have an opportunity to
request reconsideration of a rating of
record by a management official other
than the rating official. Such
reconsiderations must be initiated no
more than 15 days after the official
rating of record is assigned, consistent
with the applicable administrative
grievance policy. If the reconsideration
of the appraisal results in a different
rating of record, the revised rating of
record will become the basis for the
employee’s pay increase(s) in
accordance with section III.C. If the
adjustment occurs after all pay
deliberations have been finalized, it
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
26446
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
does not result in a recalculation of
other employees’ pay increases.
If, after an opportunity to improve, an
employee’s performance is still not
satisfactory, the Rating Official will give
the employee a rating of Level 1,
Unacceptable, and must take action to
reassign or remove the employee, or
place the employee in a lower pay band,
in accordance with performance action
provisions in law and regulation.
C. Performance-based Pay Increases and
Awards
1. Performance Shares
FSIS will establish rating/share
patterns for each pay pool—that is, the
relationship between ratings of record
and numbers of shares. A share
mechanism will be used (1) to ensure
that employees with higher ratings of
record receive greater pay increases than
employees with relatively lower ratings,
and (2) to control costs without
resorting to a forced distribution of
ratings, which is prohibited.
FSIS may adjust rating/share patterns
over time after coordination with OPM,
and after giving affected employees
advance notice. A change in the rating/
share pattern may be applied in
computing performance increases based
on an appraisal period only if it takes
effect at least 120 days before the end of
that appraisal period.
Each employee will be assigned a
certain number of shares, based on his
or her rating or record. Initially, the
number of shares for each rating level
will be as follows: 9 shares are assigned
to the Outstanding rating; 6 shares to the
Superior rating; and 4 shares to the
Fully Successful rating. No shares may
be assigned to any rating of record
below Fully Successful, since no pay
increase is payable to employees with
such a rating of record.
After the ratings of record and shares
are assigned to employees the value of
a single share can be calculated. The
value of each performance share will be
expressed as a percentage of the rate of
basic pay. The agency will provide
training to all project participants to
assure fair, accurate performance ratings
and equitable performance payouts.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
2. Performance Pay Pools
Funds that otherwise would be spent
on the annual GS pay adjustment,
within-grade increases (WGI’s), and
quality step increases (QSI’s) for
demonstration project employees will
instead be placed into a pay pool, which
will be used to fund annual
performance increases. Unlike GS
employees, participating employees
whose most recent rating of record is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
below Fully Successful will not receive
any increase in their rate of basic pay.
Participating programs will establish
pay pools for allocating performancebased pay increases. FSIS will
determine which participating
employees are covered by any pay pool
and determine the dollar value of each
pay pool. In setting the value of the pay
pool, FSIS will initially allocate an
amount for performance-based pay
increases equal to the estimated value of
the WGI’s, QSI’s and the annual GS pay
adjustments that otherwise would have
been paid to participating employees. In
computing the estimated value of WGI’s,
and QSI’s, FSIS may use
Governmentwide or agency historical
averages.
3. Performance-based Pay Increases
FSIS will determine the value of one
performance share, expressed as a
percentage of the employee’s rate of
basic pay, based on the value of the pay
pool and the distribution of shares
among pay pool employees. An
individual employee’s performance
payout is determined by multiplying the
determined percentage value of a
performance share by the number of
shares assigned to the employee. On the
first day of the first pay period
beginning on or after January 1 of each
year, this amount will be paid as an
increase in the employee’s rate of basic
pay, but only to the extent that it does
not cause the employee’s rate to exceed
the applicable maximum of the
employee’s rate range. Notwithstanding
the preceding sentence, employees in
the upper range extension rated below
the highest rating level are subject to
special rules as described in sections
III.A.6 and III.A.11. Any portion of an
employee’s performance pay increase
amount that cannot be delivered as a
basic pay increase will be paid out as a
lump-sum performance bonus (with no
charge to the pay pool). Such a lumpsum payment is not basic pay for any
purpose and is not a cash award under
chapter 45 of title 5, United States Code.
An employee with a rating of record
of Fully Successful or higher may not
receive a performance payout that is less
than the percentage value of any
simultaneous rate range adjustment,
except for (1) an employee receiving a
retained rate and (2) an employee in the
upper range extension with a rating of
record below Outstanding (Level 5) who
is converted to a retained rate (as
provided in section III.A.11.). This
guaranteed amount will be used in place
of any lower performance payout
resulting from the share methodology.
Any additional costs of using the
guaranteed amount will be funded
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
outside the pay pool. Otherwise, the
guaranteed amount is applied in the
same manner as the regular performance
payout.
An employee who does not have a
rating of record for the appraisal period
most recently completed will be treated
the same as employees in the same pay
pool who received the modal rating for
that period, subject to FSIS proration
policies.
FSIS may establish policies on
prorating the performance-based pay
increases and/or lump-sum payments
for an employee who, during the period
between annual pay adjustments, was
(1) hired or promoted, (2) in leavewithout-pay status, (3) on a part-time
work schedule, or (4) in other
circumstances that make proration
appropriate. Such proration policies
will provide each eligible employee
with the full percentage adjustment
used to adjust base rate ranges (if any)
and will prorate any additional amount
of performance pay increase that would
be applicable to the employee but for
the proration requirement.
If any employee’s rating of record that
is the basis for a performance payout is
retroactively revised (after the regular
effective date of performance payouts)
through a reconsideration or grievance
process, the employee’s performance
payout must be retroactively
recomputed using the share value as
originally determined. Any such
retroactive corrections are not funded
out of the pay pool and do not affect the
performance payouts provided to other
employees in the pay pool. In setting the
size of a future pay pool, management
will take into account past and
projected corrections.
Special provision for employees
receiving a retained rate: An employee
receiving a retained rate under 5 U.S.C.
5363 or 5 U.S.C. 3594 is not eligible for
a basic pay increase except in
conjunction with (1) a rate range
adjustment as described in section
III.A.11 or (2) a geographic conversion
under 5 CFR.359.705(e) or 536.303(b), as
applicable. At the discretion of an
authorized agency official, a retained
rate employee may receive the same
lump-sum payment payable to an
employee in the same pay pool who is
at the applicable range maximum and
who has the same rating of record and
number of shares.
Special provisions for employees
returning to duty after a period of
service in the uniformed services or in
receipt of workers’ compensation
benefits: Special pay-setting provisions
apply to employees who do not have a
rating of record to support a pay
adjustment but who are returning to
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
duty status after a period of leavewithout-pay or separation during which
the employee (1) was serving in the
uniformed services (as defined in 38
U.S.C. 4303 and 5 CFR 353.102) with
legal restoration rights (e.g., 38 U.S.C.
4316), or (2) was receiving workers’
compensation benefits under 5 U.S.C.
chapter 81, subchapter I. In these cases,
FSIS will determine the employee’s
prospective rate of basic pay upon
return to duty by making performancebased pay increases for the intervening
period based on the modal rating of
record for employees in the same pay
pool. The performance pay increases
during the intervening period may not
be prorated based on periods covered by
this provision. In addition, a
performance pay increase that is
effective after the employee’s return to
duty may not be prorated based on
periods covered by this provision. A
lump-sum payment for a period
including actual service performed after
the employee’s return to duty must be
prorated (based on service covered by
this provision) under the same agency
proration policies that apply generally
to periods of leave without pay.
4. Employees Who Cannot Receive a
Performance Pay Increase
Employees with a rating of record
below Fully Successful are prohibited
from receiving a performance payout.
When an employee does not receive a
performance pay increase because of
performance below Fully Successful, his
or her pay rate may fall below the
normal minimum rate of the pay band,
since that range minimum may be
increasing. However, in no case may an
employee’s rate of basic pay be set more
than 5 percent below the normal range
minimum.
If FSIS later chooses to give such an
employee a new rating of record of Fully
Successful or higher before the end of
the next appraisal period, the employee
is entitled to an increase effective on the
first day of the first pay period
beginning on or after the date the new
rating of record is final. The increase
must be the same dollar amount as the
increase the employee would have
received if he or she had been rated
Fully Successful at the time the increase
was initially denied.
Each employee who does not receive
an increase in basic pay because his or
her performance is less than Fully
Successful will be entitled to be notified
promptly in writing of that fact. At the
same time, the employee must be
informed in writing of the right to
request that the agency reconsider its
determination, under the same
procedures prescribed by OPM
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
regarding the determination not to
provide a within-grade increase under 5
U.S.C. 5335(c). The Merit Systems
Protection Board will process any
appeals under this section in the same
manner that it processes appeals under
5 U.S.C. 5335(c).
See section III.A.7 and section III.A.12
regarding the recomputation of an
employee’s rate of basic pay to prevent
a pay increase resulting from an
increase in the applicable locality
payment or staffing supplement.
5. Performance Awards
Performance awards may be granted
to any employee with a rating of record
at Level 3 (Fully Successful) or higher
and are given at the end of the
performance year in conjunction with
decisions on performance pay increases.
FSIS will adopt supplemental award
administration policies not specifically
covered under the plan to improve
implementation of existing authorities
prescribed under chapter 45, title 5,
United States Code. These performance
awards are separate from performance
pay increases.
D. Developmental Pay Increases
Employees in developmental
positions (i.e., positions with promotion
potential to a higher pay band) may
receive additional pay increases (in
addition to the annual performance pay
increase) as they acquire the
competencies, skills and knowledge
necessary to advance to the full
performance level of their position. An
employee in a developmental position
may be awarded a pay increase within
his or her pay band that ranges up to 7
percent of basic pay to recognize the
faster progression that can occur in a
developmental position. Employees
must be performing at the Fully
Successful level or higher to be eligible
for a developmental pay increase.
Developmental pay increases may be
paid no more than once during a 52week period and following the mid-year
progress review in accordance with
implementing guidance. Developmental
pay increases must be approved by the
program’s Assistant Administrator or
his or her designee to ensure equity and
accountability. The funds previously
used for career promotions for the GS
grade levels will initially be used to
fund the developmental pay increases in
the first fiscal year of the program’s
implementation. In all future fiscal
years, FSIS will allocate a fixed amount
of funds within the annual
appropriation, and these funds will go
into a pool for distribution to each FSIS
program area to cover developmental
pay increases.
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26447
E. Staffing
1. Minimum Qualification Requirements
Application of the OPM Operating
Manual: Qualification Standards for
General Schedule Positions is simplified
by allowing a candidate to qualify for a
specific pay band if the candidate meets
(or exceeds) the requirements for the
lowest grade included in that specific
pay band. For example, a candidate for
a 403-Microbiologist position assigned
to Pay Band 2 (GS–5 through GS–7)
need only meet the qualification
requirements for a GS–0403
Microbiologist position at the GS–5
level.
For FSIS demonstration project
employees and employees of other
Federal agencies who are in sufficiently
similar pay banding systems (as
described in FSIS implementing
policies), the common OPM
requirement of 1 year of experience ‘‘at
the next lower grade in the normal line
of progression for the occupation’’ is
changed to ‘‘at the next lower pay band
in the normal line of progression for the
occupation.’’
2. Flexible Pay Setting for New Hires
Upon appointment to a demonstration
project position under Delegated
Examining, Direct-Hire Authorization or
other authority primarily designed for
initial entry into the Federal service
(e.g., Veterans Employment Opportunity
Act, 30% Disabled Veteran
Appointment), an appointee’s pay rate
may be set at any rate within the normal
pay band range. In exercising this
flexibility, FSIS will consider the
appointee’s qualifications, competing
job offers, the agency’s need for the
appointee’s talents, the availability of
other candidates, the appointee’s
potential contributions to FSIS mission
accomplishment, and the rates received
by on-board employees. This flexibility
will allow FSIS to compete more
effectively with private industry for the
best talent available. Implementing
guidance will provide managers with
assistance in setting pay to assure fair
and equitable treatment of a diverse
workforce.
3. Promotions
A promotion is a change to (1) a
higher pay band in the same career path
or (2) a pay band in another career path
with a higher maximum rate of basic
pay. To be eligible for promotion, an
employee must have a current
performance rating of Fully Successful
or higher. The time-in-band requirement
for promotion eligibility is 52 weeks,
with one exception: An employee may
be promoted from Pay Band 1 to Pay
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
26448
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Band 2 in the Management Support
Career Path or in the Scientific and
Technical Support Career Path without
time restriction. (See section III.A.9. for
pay setting upon promotion.) When
employees are competitively selected
for a position with promotion potential,
and are subsequently moved to a higher
pay band in their career path, the action
is processed as a non-competitive pay
band promotion until the full
performance level of the position is
reached.
F. Reduction in Force
If, during the life of the demonstration
project, FSIS enters into a reduction in
force (RIF), the RIF will be conducted in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 1302 and 3502
and 5 CFR part 351, except as follows:
(a) Each of the career paths in each
FSIS local commuting area will
constitute separate competitive areas
(i.e., separate from the other career
paths, and separate from the
competitive areas of other FSIS
employees);
(b) FSIS will establish competitive
levels consisting of all positions in a
competitive area which are in the same
pay band and classification series, and
which are similar enough in duties,
qualification requirements, pay
schedules, and working conditions so
that the incumbent of one position may
be reassigned to any of the other
positions in the level without undue
interruption. Each demonstration
project competitive level will become a
Retention List for purposes of
competition when employees are
released from their competitive levels,
displaced by higher-standing
employees, or placed during the
exercise of assignment rights.
(c) Assignment rights will be modified
by substituting ‘‘one pay band’’ for
‘‘three grades’’ and ‘‘two pay bands’’ for
‘‘five grades.’’
(d) FSIS will use retention standing
when it chooses to offer vacant
positions within the meaning of 5 CFR
351.704.
Prior to conducting a RIF, FSIS will
issue and implement a policy in
accordance with 5 CFR part 330, subpart
B, except that the establishment and
operation of a reemployment priority
list (RPL) will be designed to assist
current FSIS competitive service
demonstration project employees who
will be separated as a result of a RIF
and, subsequently, former FSIS
competitive service demonstration
project employees who have been
separated as a result of a RIF, or who
have fully recovered from a
compensable injury after more than 1
year, in their efforts to be reemployed at
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
FSIS, by affording them reemployment
priority over certain outside job
applicants for FSIS competitive service
demonstration project vacancies.
FSIS will develop and adopt
supplemental RIF administration
procedures to augment the RIF policies
stipulated by this plan.
IV. Training
Training will be provided to all
participating employees, supervisors,
and managers before the project is
launched and throughout the life of the
project. It is important that employees
perceive the performance management
program as fair and transparent;
therefore, supervisors and managers will
be trained extensively in setting and
communicating performance
expectations; monitoring performance
and providing timely feedback;
developing employee performance and
addressing poor performance; rating
employees’ performance based on
expectations; and involving employees
in the development and implementation
of the performance appraisal program.
Supervisors and managers will be held
accountable for the effective
management of the performance of
employees they supervise through
performance expectations set for and
appraisals made of their own
performance in this regard.
All employees will be trained in the
performance appraisal process and the
pay adjustment mechanism. Various
types of training are being considered,
including video conferencing, on-line
tutorials, simulation, and train-thetrainer concepts.
V. Conversion
A. Conversion to the Demonstration
Project
1. Only General Schedule (pay plan
codes GS and GM) employees who are
not in a bargaining unit will be
converted to this project (excludes nonbargaining unit food inspection (GS–
1863) employees appointed under
Schedule A 213.3113(1)(3) and
Schedule C employees). Employees
whose positions become covered by the
demonstration project will convert into
the career path and pay band covering
the occupational series and grade of
their position of record. Employees will
convert to the demonstration project
with no change in their total rate of pay
(including basic pay, plus any
applicable locality payment, special rate
supplement or staffing supplement).
Special conversion rules apply to
special rate employees as described in
section III.A.12, Staffing Supplements.
Any simultaneous pay action that is
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
scheduled to take effect under the GS
pay system on the date of conversion
must be processed before processing the
conversion to the pay banding system.
FSIS implementing policies will
provide procedures for converting an
employee on grade retention under 5
U.S.C. 5362 or receiving a retained rate
under 5 U.S.C. 5363 or a saved rate
under 5 U.S.C. 3594 to the
demonstration project.
2. Immediately after conversion,
eligible employees will receive an
increase in basic pay reflecting the
prorated value of the next scheduled
within-grade increase (WGI). The
prorated value is determined by
calculating the portion of the time in
step employees have completed towards
the waiting period for their next WGI.
This WGI ‘‘buy-in’’ adjustment will not
be paid to (1) employees who are at the
step 10 rate for their grade immediately
before conversion to the demonstration
project, (2) employees who are receiving
a retained rate of pay under 5 U.S.C.
5363 or saved rate under 5 U.S.C. 3594
immediately before conversion to the
demonstration project, or (3) employees
whose rating of record is below Fully
Successful.
3. Adverse action provisions under 5
U.S.C. chapter 75, subchapter II, do not
apply to reductions in pay upon
conversion into the demonstration
project as long as the employee’s total
rate of pay (including basic pay, plus
any applicable locality payment, special
rate supplement) is not reduced upon
conversion.
4. The first performance-based pay
increase under the project’s pay
adjustment mechanism will be effective
on the first day of the first pay period
beginning on or after January 1, 2010.
5. For employees who enter the
demonstration project by lateral
reassignment or transfer (i.e., not by
conversion of position), FSIS may apply
parallel pay conversion rules, including
rules for providing a prorated
adjustment reflecting time accrued
toward a GS within-grade increase or
similar within-range adjustment under
another pay system. If conversion into
the demonstration project is
accompanied by a geographic move, the
employee’s pay entitlements under the
former pay system in the new
geographic area must be determined
before performing the pay conversion.
B. Conversion to the General Schedule
FSIS implementing guidance will
provide procedures for converting an
employee’s pay band and pay rate to a
GS-equivalent grade and rate of pay if
the employee moves out of the
demonstration project to a GS position.
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
The converted GS-equivalent grade and
rate of pay will be determined before
any geographic move, promotion, or
other simultaneous action that occurs
simultaneously with conversion back to
the GS system. The new employing
organization must use the converted GSequivalent grade and rate of pay in
applying various pay administration
rules that govern how pay is set in the
GS position (e.g., rules for promotion
and highest previous rate under 5 CFR
part 531, subpart B, and pay retention
under 5 CFR part 536). The converted
GS rate will not be adjusted to match a
step rate before applying those rules.
The converted GS grade and rate of pay
are deemed to have been in effect at the
time the employee left the
demonstration project pay banding
system. The rules for determining the
converted GS grade for pay
administration purposes do not apply to
the determination of an employee’s GSequivalent grade for other purposes,
such as reduction-in-force or adverse
action. FSIS will perform the
computations for employees who
remain within FSIS and USDA. FSIS
may perform the computations, as a
courtesy, for employees who move to
other Federal agencies. At a minimum,
FSIS will provide a copy of the
conversion procedures to gaining
Federal agencies for their use. If an
employee moves out of the
demonstration project to a non-GS
system, the employee’s pay will be set
under the pay-setting rules governing
that system.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
VI. Project Modification
Demonstration projects require
modification from time to time as
experience is gained, results are
analyzed, and conclusions are reached
on how the system is working. FSIS may
modify and adjust features and elements
of this project plan over time. FSIS will
coordinate such modifications with
OPM and gain its approval prior to
implementing the modification.
Depending on the nature and extent of
the modification, OPM may require that
the modification be published as a
notice in the Federal Register.
VII. Project Duration
The initial implementation period for
the demonstration project will be 5
years. However, with OPM’s
concurrence, the project may be
extended for additional testing or
terminated before the expiration of the
5-year period.
VIII. Project Evaluation
Chapter 47 of title 5, United States
Code, requires an evaluation of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
results of the demonstration project.
FSIS, in coordination with USDA and
OPM, will develop a plan to evaluate
the demonstration project to determine
the extent to which the pay increases
paid to participating employees reflect
meaningful distinctions among their
levels of performance and the extent to
which the project is achieving its other
stated goals. Workforce data will be
analyzed to make this assessment. Key
features of successful performancebased pay systems, including leadership
commitment, communication,
stakeholder involvement, training,
planning, mission alignment, and the
rewarding of performance, will be
assessed to determine the effectiveness
of the demonstration project and ensure
compliance with stated project goals.
The evaluation will address the extent
to which the project has incorporated
the elements required by section 1126 of
Public Law 108–136 (5 U.S.C. 4701
note). In addition, the project will be
examined during each phase of the
evaluation to assess that costs are being
managed effectively. Moreover, cost
discipline will be examined during each
phase of the evaluation to ensure
spending remains within acceptable
limits. Finally, employee feedback will
be sought through surveys, interviews,
and focus groups to assess employee
perceptions of the fairness and integrity
of the performance appraisal and pay
adjustment processes.
IX. Costs
A. Buy-in Costs
Upon conversion to the
demonstration system many employees
will receive an increase in basic pay for
the prorated time in grade towards their
next within-grade increase. However,
these costs will be offset by the
elimination of within-grade step
increases that otherwise would have
occurred.
B. Recurring Costs
All funding will be provided through
the organization’s budget. Each project
program area will maintain
compensation during the project at the
level it would have reached under the
current system. No additional funding
will be requested specifically for this
project; all costs will be charged to
available funds through existing
appropriations. To ensure appropriate
carryover of costs from pre-project to
project years, a base assessment will be
made using 3 base years: Fiscal Years
2005, 2006, and 2007. For example, data
associated with average annual salary,
pay increases and promotions, turnover,
and other relevant data will be collected
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26449
to ensure a thorough analysis of costs
which are impacted by pay banding.
Budget discipline will be required and
achieved by imposing specific funding
principles. Finally, both longitudinal
and site comparisons will be used to
ensure that spending remains within
acceptable limits.
X. Waiver of Laws and Regulations
Required
A. Title 5, United States Code
Chapter 35, section 3594: Saved pay
for former members of the Senior
Executive Service (only to the extent
necessary to (1) bar employees with a
rating of record lower than Fully
Successful from receiving saved rate
increases under 5 U.S.C. 3594(c)(2); (2)
provide a saved rate that is less than the
maximum rate (including any locality
adjustment or staffing supplement) of
the upper range extension for an
employee who receives a rating of
record of Outstanding will be
terminated and converted to an equal
adjusted rate; (3) provide the range
maximum rate used to compute saved
rate adjustments is the normal range
maximum rate (including any locality
adjustment or staffing supplement) for
employees with a rating of record below
Outstanding and the upper range
maximum rate (including any locality
adjustment or staffing supplement) for
an employees with an Outstanding
rating of record; and (4) provide when
a frozen saved rate for an employee with
a rating of record below Fully
Successful falls below the applicable
adjusted rate for the normal band
maximum, the saved rate will be
terminated and the employee’s pay will
be set at an adjusted rate equal to the
saved rate).
Chapter 51: Classification (except that
(1) sections 5111 and 5112 are retained
with ‘‘grade’’ replaced by ‘‘pay bands’’
and (2) for the purpose of applying any
other laws, regulations, or policies that
refer to GS employees or to chapter 51
of title 5, United States Code, the
modified classification system
established under this plan must be
considered to be a GS classification
system under chapter 51; this includes,
but is not limited to, the reference to the
General Schedule in section 5545(d)
(relating to hazard pay).
Chapter 53, section 5302(1)(A), (8)
and (9): Definitions (only to the extent
necessary to provide that employees
under the demonstration project are not
considered to be GS employees for the
purposes of annual adjustments under
section 5303 or similar provision of law
governing annual adjustments for
employees covered by section 5303).
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
26450
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
Chapter 53, section 5303: Annual
adjustments to pay schedules Chapter
53, section 5304(g)(1): Locality-based
comparability payments (only to the
extent necessary to (1) provide a locality
rate may not exceed the rate for EX-IV
plus 5 percent for employees in the
upper range extension) and (2) apply an
‘‘effective’’ locality pay percentage for
employees in the upper range extension
under circumstances described in the
plan).
Chapter 53, section 5305: Special pay
authority.
Chapter 53, subchapter III: General
Schedule pay rates (except that, for
purposes of applying any other laws,
regulations, or policies that refer to GS
employees or to subchapter III of
chapter 53 of title 5, United States Code,
the modified pay system established
under this plan must be considered to
be a GS pay system established under
such subchapter III, except as otherwise
provided in this plan; this includes, but
is not limited to, references to the
General Schedule in section 5304
(relating to locality pay), section 5545(d)
(relating to hazard pay), and sections
5753–5754 (dealing with recruitment,
relocation, and retention incentives).
Chapter 53, section 5362: Grade
retention.
Chapter 53, section 5363: Pay
retention (only to the extent necessary
to (1) replace ‘‘grade’’ with ‘‘pay band;’’
(2) bar employees with a rating of record
lower than Fully Successful from
receiving retained rate increases under 5
U.S.C. 5363(b)(2)(B); (3) provide that
pay retention provisions do not apply to
conversions into the demonstration
project from the General Schedule or
other pay system, as long as the
employee’s total pay rate is not reduced;
(4) provide the pay (including any
locality adjustment or staffing
supplement) of an employee in the
upper range extension who is rated
below Outstanding will be converted to
a retained rate before processing any
other actions; (5) provide a retained rate
that is less than the maximum rate
(including any locality adjustment or
staffing supplement) of the upper range
extension for an employee who receives
a rating of record of Outstanding will be
terminated and converted to an equal
adjusted rate; (6) provide the range
maximum rate used to compute retained
rate adjustments is the normal range
maximum rate (including any locality
adjustment or staffing supplement) for
employees with a rating of record below
Outstanding and the upper range
maximum rate (including any locality
adjustment or staffing supplement) for
an employees with an Outstanding
rating of record; and (7) provide when
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
a retained rate for an employee with a
rating of record below Fully Successful
falls below the applicable adjusted rate
for the normal band maximum, the
retained rate will be terminated and the
employee’s pay will be set at an
adjusted rate equal to the retained rate).
Chapter 55, section 5542(a): Overtime
rates (only to the extent necessary to
provide that the GS–10 minimum
special rate (if any) for the special rate
category that would otherwise apply to
an employee (but for the existence of the
demonstration project) is deemed to be
the ‘‘applicable special rate of pay’’ in
determining the overtime hourly rate
cap).
Chapter 55, section 5547: Limitation
on premium pay (only to the extent
necessary to provide that an applicable
staffing supplement is added to the GS–
15, step 10, rate in lieu of the applicable
locality payment).
Chapter 59, section 5941: Cost-ofliving allowances and post differentials
(only to the extent necessary to provide
that employees in the demonstration
project pay system are eligible for
coverage under section 5941).
Chapter 75, section 7512(3): Adverse
actions (only to the extent necessary to
replace ‘‘grade’’ with ‘‘pay band’’).
Chapter 75, section 7512(4): Adverse
actions (only to the extent necessary to
provide that adverse action provisions
do not apply to (1) conversions into the
demonstration project from the General
Schedule or other pay system, as long as
the employee’s total rate of pay is not
reduced and (2) reductions in rates of
basic pay to offset a locality pay or
staffing supplement increase as a result
of receiving a rating of record below
Fully Successful).
Note: If any of the provisions of title 5,
United States Code, listed above are amended
during the period this demonstration project
is in effect, FSIS may choose to terminate the
waiver of one or more such provisions with
respect to employees participating in the
project, without formally modifying the
project itself. FSIS must notify OPM when
any such waiver is terminated.
B. Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations
Part 300, subpart F: Time-in-grade
restrictions (only to the extent necessary
to replace ‘‘grade’’ with ‘‘pay band’’).
Part 330, subpart B, section 330.201:
Establishment and maintenance of
Reemployment Priority List (RPL) (only
to the extent necessary to establish and
maintain a reemployment priority list
exclusively for FSIS competitive service
demonstration project employees).
Part 351, subpart D, section 351.402:
Competitive area (only to the extent
necessary to permit the use of career
paths in conjunction with
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
organizational units and geographic
locations when establishing competitive
areas).
Part 351, subpart D, section 351.403:
Competitive level (only to the extent
necessary to substitute ‘‘same pay band’’
for ‘‘same grade’’).
Part 351, subpart G, section 351.701:
Assignment involving displacement
(only to the extent necessary to
substitute ‘‘one pay band’’ for ‘‘three
grades’’ and ‘‘two pay bands’’ for ‘‘five
grades’’).
Part 359, subpart G, section 359.705:
Pay (only to the extent necessary to (1)
bar employees with a rating of record
lower than Fully Successful from
receiving a saved rate increase under 5
CFR 359.705(d)(1)); (2) provide a saved
rate that is less than the maximum rate
(including any locality adjustment or
staffing supplement) of the upper range
extension for an employee who receives
a rating of record of Outstanding will be
terminated and converted to an equal
adjusted rate; (3) provide the range
maximum rate used to compute saved
rate adjustments is the normal range
maximum rate (including any locality
adjustment or staffing supplement) for
employees with a rating of record below
Outstanding and the upper range
maximum rate (including any locality
adjustment or staffing supplement) for
an employees with an Outstanding
rating of record; and (4) provide when
a saved rate for an employee with a
rating of record below Fully Successful
falls below the applicable adjusted rate
for the normal band maximum, the
saved rate will be terminated and the
employee’s pay will be set at an
adjusted rate equal to the saved rate).
Part 430, subpart B, section 430.203:
Definitions (only to the extent necessary
to allow an additional rating of record
to support a pay decision under section
III.C.3 or 4 of this project plan).
Part 511, subpart B: Coverage of the
General Schedule.
Part 511, section 511.607:
Nonappealable issues.
Part 530, subpart C: Special Rate
Schedules for Recruitment and
Retention.
Part 531, subpart B: Determining Rate
of Basic Pay.
Part 531, subpart D: Within-Grade
Increases.
Part 531, subpart E: Quality Step
Increases.
Part 531, section 531.604:
Determining an employee’s locality rate
(only to the extent necessary to apply an
‘‘effective’’ locality pay percentage for
employees in the upper range extension
under circumstances described in the
plan).
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 91 / Friday, May 9, 2008 / Notices
Part 531, section 531.606: Maximum
limits on locality rates (only to the
extent necessary to provide a locality
rate may not exceed the rate for EX-IV
plus 5 percent for employees in the
upper range extension).
Part 536, subpart B: Grade Retention.
Part 536, subpart C: Pay Retention
(only to the extent necessary to (1)
replace ‘‘grade’’ with ‘‘pay band;’’ (2)
bar employees with a rating of record
lower than Fully Successful from
receiving retained rate increases under 5
CFR 536.305; (3) provide that pay
retention provisions do not apply to
conversions into the demonstration
project from the General Schedule or
other pay system, as long as the
employee’s total pay rate is not
reduced); (4) provide that a retained rate
may not exceed the rate for EX–IV plus
5 percent; (5) provide the pay (including
any locality adjustment or staffing
supplement) of an employee in the
upper range extension who is rated
below Outstanding will be converted to
a retained rate before processing any
other actions; (6) provide a retained rate
that is less than the maximum rate
(including any locality adjustment or
staffing supplement) of the upper range
extension for an employee who receives
a rating of record of Outstanding will be
terminated and converted to an equal
adjusted rate; (7) provide the range
maximum rate used to compute retained
rate adjustments is the normal range
maximum rate (including any locality
adjustment or staffing supplement) for
employees with a rating of record below
Outstanding and the upper range
maximum rate (including any locality
adjustment or staffing supplement) for
an employees with an Outstanding
rating of record; and (8) provide when
a retained rate for an employee with a
rating of record below Fully Successful
falls below the applicable adjusted rate
for the normal band maximum, the
retained rate will be terminated and the
employee’s pay will be set at an
adjusted rate equal to the retained rate).
Part 550, sections 550.106–107:
Biweekly and annual maximum
earnings limitation (only to the extent
necessary to provide that an applicable
staffing supplement is added to the GS–
15, step 10, rate in lieu of the applicable
locality payment).
Part 550, section 550.113(a):
Computation of overtime pay (only to
the extent necessary to provide that the
GS–10 minimum special rate (if any) for
the special rate category that would
otherwise apply to an employee (but for
the existence of the demonstration
project) is deemed to be the ‘‘applicable
special rate of pay’’ in determining the
overtime hourly rate cap).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:01 May 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
Part 550, section 550.703: Definitions
(to the extent necessary to modify
paragraph (c)(4) of the definition of
‘‘reasonable offer’’ by replacing ‘‘two
grade or pay levels’’ with ‘‘one pay band
level’’ and ‘‘grade or pay level’’ with
‘‘pay band level’’).
Part 591, subpart B, section 591.204:
Cost-of-living allowances and post
differentials (only to the extent
necessary to provide that the
demonstration project pay system is a
qualifying pay plan).
Part 752, section 752.401(a)(3):
Adverse actions (only to the extent
necessary to replace ‘‘grade’’ with ‘‘pay
band’’).
Part 752, section 752.401(a)(4):
Adverse actions (only to the extent
necessary to provide that adverse action
provisions do not apply to (1)
conversions into the demonstration
project from the General Schedule or
other pay system, as long as the
employee’s total rate of pay is not
reduced and (2) reductions in rates of
basic pay to offset a locality pay or
staffing supplement rate increase as a
result of receiving a rating of record
below Fully Successful).
Note: If any of the provisions of title 5,
Code of Federal Regulations, listed above are
revised during the period this demonstration
project is in effect, FSIS may choose to
terminate the waiver of one or more such
provisions with respect to employees
participating in the project, without formally
modifying the project itself. FSIS must notify
OPM when any such waiver is terminated.
[FR Doc. E8–10440 Filed 5–8–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–43–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
File No. 500–1
In the Matter of: ABS Group, Inc. (n/k/
a The Motion Picture Group, Inc.),
Accrue Software, Inc., iAsiaworks, Inc.,
Premier Laser Systems, Inc., Siskon
Gold Corp., and Syquest Technology,
Inc. (n/k/a SYQT, Inc.); Order of
Suspension of Trading
May 7, 2008.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of ABS Group,
Inc. (n/k/a The Motion Picture Group,
Inc.), because it has not filed any
periodic reports since the period ended
June 30, 1998.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Accrue
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26451
Software, Inc., because it has not filed
any periodic reports since the period
ended December 28, 2002.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of iAsiaworks,
Inc., because it has not filed any
periodic reports since the period ended
September 30, 2001.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Premier
Laser Systems, Inc., because it has not
filed any periodic reports since the
period ended December 31, 1999.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Siskon Gold
Corp., because it has not filed any
periodic reports since the period ended
December 31, 1997.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Syquest
Technology, Inc. (n/k/a SYQT, Inc.),
because it has not filed any periodic
reports since the period ended June 30,
1998.
The Commission is of the opinion that
the public interest and the protection of
investors require a suspension of trading
in the securities of the above-listed
companies.
Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to
section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, that trading in the
securities of the above-listed companies
is suspended for the period from 9:30
a.m. EDT on May 7, 2008, through 11:59
p.m. EDT on May 20, 2008.
By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 08–1241 Filed 5–7–08; 10:47 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[File No. 500–1]
In the Matter of: National
Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.,
Natural Solutions Corp., Natural
Wonders, Inc., Net Nanny Software
International, Inc., Netcentives, Inc.,
and Netcruise.com, Inc.; Order of
Suspension of Trading
May 6, 2008.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of National
E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM
09MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 91 (Friday, May 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26436-26451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10440]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
Proposed Personnel Demonstration Project; Alternative Personnel
Management System for the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety
and Inspection Service
AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
ACTION: Notice of a proposed demonstration project plan.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Chapter 47 of title 5, United States Code, authorizes the U.S.
Office of Personnel Management (OPM), directly or in agreement with one
or more agencies, to conduct demonstration projects that experiment
with new and different human resources management concepts to determine
whether changes in human resources policy or procedures result in
improved Federal human resources management. The Food Safety and
Inspection Service (FSIS), the United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA), and OPM propose to test a results-based, competency-linked pay-
for-performance system that is combined with a simplified, pay banding
classification and compensation system. Section 4703 of
[[Page 26437]]
title 5 requires OPM to publish the proposed project plan in the
Federal Register. This notice fulfills that requirement.
DATES: To be considered, written comments must be submitted on or
before June 9, 2008. A public hearing will be held on the proposed
project plan on Thursday, June 26, 2008, and will begin at 10 a.m.,
Eastern Standard Time. The location of the hearing is: U.S. Department
of Agriculture, South Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250. You must use the 7th wing entrance which is
accessible from Independence Avenue.
Public parking is limited, but the building is conveniently
accessible to the ``Smithsonian'' Metro stations. The South Building is
a secure facility. Members of the public must show a government-issued
photo ID (e.g. State driver's license). Attendees will undergo
electronic screening, and their personal belongings will be subject to
a physical search. Personal items prohibited in the South Building
include devices that can transmit and record, weapons (guns, knives,
explosives, etc.), and alcohol. A member of the public possessing such
items will be barred from entering, and such items are subject to
confiscation. There will be a sign-in table set up in the lobby of the
Jefferson Auditorium. A greeter and signs will direct attendees to the
auditorium location.
There will be a telephone call-in number for members of the public
and agency who cannot attend in person. That number will be 888-790-
4330 (Passcode: Demonstration Project), and the line will be active
from 10 a.m. Eastern Standard Time until the conclusion of the hearing.
At the time of the hearing, interested persons or organizations may
present their written or oral comments on the proposed demonstration
project. The hearing will be informal. However, anyone wishing to
testify should contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, so that FSIS, USDA, and OPM can plan the hearing and provide
sufficient lead time for all interested persons and organizations to be
heard. Priority will be given to those on the schedule, with others
speaking in any remaining available time. Each speaker's presentation
will be limited to five minutes. Written comments may be submitted to
supplement oral testimony during the public comment period.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Demonstration Projects, U.S.
Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 7677,
Washington, DC 20415 or submitted by e-mail to Demoprojects@opm.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (1) FSIS, Laurie Lindsay, Director, HR
Demonstration Project Staff, (202) 720-7983, 1400 Independence Avenue,
SW., Room 2134 South Building, Washington D.C, 20250; (2) Office of
Personnel Management, Patsy Stevens, Systems Innovation Group Manager,
(202) 606-1574, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street,
NW., Room 7456, Washington, DC 20415.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The goals of this demonstration project are
to improve workforce performance and promote mission accomplishment by
making employees' pay increases more performance-sensitive, so that
only Fully Successful and higher performers will receive any pay
adjustments and the best performers will receive the largest pay
adjustments. This will produce such measurable outcomes as improving
the quality of new hires, increasing the proportion of agency positions
that remain filled, improving supervisors' and employees' commitment to
a highly effective performance culture, retaining good performers,
making line managers more responsible and accountable for human
resources management, improving the effectiveness and efficiency of
human resources systems, and closing human capital gaps for supervisory
and mission-critical occupations (e.g., the gap between the number of
employees required at each competency proficiency level to perform
current and future missions and the number of existing employees at
those levels).
Linda M. Springer,
Director.
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary
II. Introduction
A. Purpose
B. Problems with the Present System
C. Changes Required/Expected Benefits
D. Participating Organizations
E. Participating Employees
F. Labor Participation
G. Project Design
III. Personnel System Changes
A. Pay Banding Classification and Pay System
1. Establishment of Career Paths and Pay Bands
2. Position Classification
3. Delegation of Classification Authority
4. Classification Appeals
5. Elimination of Fixed Steps
6. Rate Range
7. Locality Pay
8. Rate of Basic Pay Upon Initial Appointment
9. Rate of Basic Pay Upon Promotion
10. Rate of Basic Pay in Noncompetitive Lateral Actions
11. Other Pay Administration Provisions
12. Staffing Supplements
13. Status as GS Employees
B. Performance Appraisal System
1. Program Requirements
2. Supervisory Accountability
3. Reconsideration of Ratings
C. Performance-based Pay Increases and Awards
1. Performance Shares
2. Performance Pay Pools
3. Performance-based Pay Increases
4. Employees Who Cannot Receive a Performance Pay Increase
5. Performance Awards
D. Developmental Pay Increases
E. Staffing
1. Minimum Qualification Requirements
2. Flexible Pay Setting for New Hires
3. Promotions
F. Reduction-in-Force
IV. Training
V. Conversion
A. Conversion to the Demonstration Project
B. Conversion to the General Schedule
VI. Project Modification
VII. Project Duration
VIII. Project Evaluation
IX. Costs
A. Buy-in Costs
B. Recurring Costs
X. Waiver of Laws and Regulations Required
I. Executive Summary
This project was designed by the United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA), including the Food Safety and Inspection Service
(FSIS), with participation of and review by the U.S. Office of
Personnel Management (OPM). The demonstration project will pursue
several key objectives: to simplify the current classification system
for greater flexibility in classifying work and paying employees; to
reaffirm the performance management and rewards system for improving
individual and organizational performance; to assure that the
allocation of annual pay increases reflects distinctions in levels of
performance in a meaningful way; and to test the effectiveness of
multi-grade pay bands in recruiting, advancing and retaining employees.
The duration of the project will be 5 years, except that the project
may be extended by OPM if further testing and evaluation are warranted.
The proposed project will test whether a results-based, competency-
linked pay-for-performance system can be successful in USDA. Previous
alternative pay systems that used competency models (e.g., the
Government Accountability Office (GAO) compensation system and the
Department of Defense (DOD) Acquisition Workforce Demonstration
Project) did not focus on missions or occupations related to public
health or food defense. Moreover, the workforce covered by the proposed
demonstration project is predominantly supervisory (about 40%), and it
is important to
[[Page 26438]]
establish effective pay-for-performance policies and procedures for
supervisory positions before extending such systems to large numbers of
line worker positions throughout the Federal Government. Finally, a
substantial number of the covered employees (approximately 30 percent)
have working conditions that are dramatically different from other
white-collar workers (e.g., shift-oriented work in slaughter or meat
processing facilities), including the requirement for substantial
amounts of regularly-scheduled and intermittent overtime.
II. Introduction
A. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed project is to strengthen the
contribution of human resources management in helping to achieve the
missions of the specific program areas of FSIS. The proposed project
will test whether a results-based, competency-linked, pay-for-
performance system and related innovations will produce successful
results in a public health regulatory environment with distinct working
conditions and an ever-present concern for food defense and security.
B. Problems with the Present System
The USDA Strategic Human Capital Plan and the President's
Management Agenda require FSIS to manage human capital in the 21st
century very aggressively. FSIS must achieve comprehensive human
capital goals for strategic workforce planning, learning and workforce
development, recruitment and retention, and evolution of a highly
effective performance culture.
The FSIS Strategic Plan calls for continued transformation of the
existing workforce, which was recruited and trained during a time when
food safety was considered a conventional inspection program governed
by legislation such as the Federal Meat Inspection Act of 1906, the
Poultry Products Inspection Act of 1957, the Wholesome Meat Act of
1967, the Wholesome Poultry Products Inspection Act of 1968, and the
Egg Products Inspection Act of 1970. This legislation was enacted when
food industry practices were characterized by carcass-by-carcass
organoleptic inspection. To carry out its public health regulatory
missions today, FSIS must assure science-based development and
execution of policy and must also emphasize risk-oriented assessment,
planning, analysis, inspection, and management activities. Also, FSIS
must recruit, develop, retain, and accomplish life-cycle management for
a workforce that is educated and skilled in public health, food
defense, food safety, public education, and emergency-response systems,
programs, practices, and technologies. In addition to inspecting
poultry and meat animals, poultry and meat products, and egg products,
FSIS must accomplish a growing list of advanced public health functions
to include conducting risk assessments to identify and evaluate the
potential human health outcomes from the consumption of meat, poultry,
and egg products.
At best, the personnel system that currently covers USDA and FSIS
employees is based on 20th century assumptions about the nature of
public service. Although the current Federal personnel management
system is based on important core principles, those principles operate
in an inflexible, one-size-fits-all system of defining work, hiring
staff, managing people, assessing and rewarding performance, and
advancing personnel. These inherent weaknesses make support of the FSIS
mission complex, costly, and, ultimately, risky from the standpoint of
public health. Currently, pay and the movement of personnel are pegged
to outdated, narrowly-defined work definitions, hiring processes are
cumbersome, and high performers and low performers are generally paid
alike. These systemic inefficiencies detract from the potential
effectiveness of the public health workforce.
The challenges facing USDA and FSIS today to assure and improve the
public health from farm to table require a workforce transformation.
FSIS employees are being asked to assume new and different
responsibilities, take more initiative, and be more innovative, agile,
and accountable than ever before. It is critical that USDA and FSIS
support the entire public health workforce with modern systems,
particularly a human resources management system that supports and
protects their critical role in public health, food safety, and food
security.
C. Changes Required/Expected Benefits
The innovations of the project and their objectives are summarized
below.
1. Pay Banding and Classification
Occupational groups will be placed in appropriate career paths, pay
bands will replace grades, and agency pay band standards will replace
OPM position classification standards. The classification system will
be automated as much as possible through intranet-based classification
tools, and authority will be delegated to line managers (at least one
level below the Deputy Assistant Administrator level).
These changes are intended to simplify and speed up the
classification process, make the process more serviceable and
understandable, improve the effectiveness of classification decision-
making and accountability, and facilitate pay for performance.
Pay bands, which generally correspond to multiple grade levels,
provide larger classification targets that can be defined by shorter,
simpler, and more understandable classification standards. This simpler
system will be easier to automate, will require fewer resources to
operate, and will facilitate delegation to line managers.
By providing broader and more flexible pay ranges for setting entry
pay, pay banding will provide hiring officials with an important tool
for attracting high-quality candidates and thus contribute to the
objective of increasing the quality of new hires.
By providing more flexible pay progression based on performance,
pay banding will give managers the ability to increase the pay of good
performers to higher and more competitive levels, thus improving the
retention of good performers. At the same time, the potential for
higher pay increases for good performance, supported by the broader pay
ranges of a pay banding system, will contribute to the objective of
improving organizational and individual performance.
2. Staffing
Additional staffing tools will include such elements as flexible
entry salaries, staffing supplements for employees in the applicable
special rate categories, developmental pay increases, and more flexible
pay increases associated with promotion.
These changes are intended to attract high-quality candidates and
increase the retention of good performers. Flexible pay-setting for new
hires is a recruiting tool that gives hiring officials greater
flexibility to offer more competitive salaries to high-quality
candidates, addressing the objective of improving the quality of new
hires. This will be used in conjunction with existing recruitment and
retention incentives under title 5.
3. Pay
The most important change in pay administration is the introduction
of a pay-for-performance system. The pay-for-performance system will
support several objectives. It will strengthen the organization's
performance culture. It will promote fairness through the
[[Page 26439]]
results-based, competency-linked, performance rating process. It will
provide a motivational tool as well as a retention tool. As a
motivational tool, the promise of higher pay increases for good
performance encourages high achievement. As a retention tool, a pay-
for-performance system allows the organization to quickly move the
salaries of good performers to levels that are more competitive in the
labor market. The promise of higher pay increases for good performance
will encourage achievement and promote the objective of improved
individual and organizational performance.
Under the proposed pay-for-performance system, employee performance
ratings will govern individual pay progression within pay bands. Any
general increase in GS rates of basic pay approved by Congress and the
President will be applied only to the FSIS band ranges (i.e., band
minimums and maximums). Demonstration project employees will receive
pay increases based on their rating of record. Funds currently applied
to within-grade increases, quality step increases, and the annual GS
pay adjustment will be used to grant these performance-based pay
increases. Employees rated below Fully Successful will not receive any
basic pay increase, nor will they receive pay increases when locality
pay percentages are increased. (See section III.C.)
In addition, employees in developmental positions may receive
additional pay increases. Funds used for career ladder promotions from
one grade to a higher grade will initially be used to fund these
developmental pay increases. These pay increases may be granted to an
employee to recognize the faster progression that can occur in a
developmental position. This pay flexibility addresses the objective of
improving retention by raising the pay of high-performing employees
while also supporting the objective of preserving merit system
principles (e.g., equal pay for work of equal value). (See section
III.D.)
4. Performance Appraisal
The demonstration project will continue to use the current FSIS
appraisal program including the current five-level rating process,
which incorporates competencies into the performance standards. (The
five-level rating system has the following levels: 1--Unacceptable, 2--
Marginal, 3--Fully Successful, 4--Superior, and 5--Outstanding.) The
performance appraisal process is intended to (1) promote good
performance; (2) encourage a continuing dialogue between supervisors
and employees on organizational objectives, supervisory expectations,
employee performance, employee needs for assistance and guidance, and
employee development; and (3) provide a basis for performance-related
decisions in employee development, pay, rewards, assignment, promotion,
and retention. The program will more effectively communicate to
employees how they are performing, the rewards of good performance, and
the consequences of poor performance.
5. Pay for Performance
The most important feature of the demonstration project is that it
links the employee's rating of record to shares of a performance pay
pool. Performance-based pay increases give an operating unit the
ability to raise the pay of good performers more rapidly, thus
improving retention of good performers. Performance pay is distributed
to employees either in the form of increases in base pay or, when the
employee reaches a band maximum (or is on retained pay), in the form of
a performance bonus. The number and type of performance pay pools will
be described in implementing guidance, but performance ratings will be
linked to performance pay shares so that employees who earn a level
five rating (the highest) will earn the greatest number of performance
pay shares, employees who earn a level four rating will earn a smaller
number of shares, and employees who earn a level three rating will earn
the fewest number of performance shares. Employees rated below level
three will not be eligible for performance pay increases.
6. Performance Awards
Existing programs for both non-monetary and monetary recognition
will remain under the plan in accordance with chapter 45 of title 5,
United States Code.
Awards address two objectives. First, rewarding achievement will
make high achievers more likely to remain, thus improving retention of
the best performers. Second, the potential for awards for achievement
will encourage improved individual performance. Although FSIS is not
testing any new procedures under the demonstration project authority in
chapter 47 of title 5, awards are a key part of a performance pay
system and therefore noted here to clarify their use and provide a full
picture of the project plan.
7. Line Management Authority
The program areas will delegate greater authority and
accountability to line managers. This delegation is intended to improve
the effectiveness of human resources management by strengthening the
role of line managers as the human resources managers of their units.
The project will be managed by the FSIS Demonstration Project
Management Board (DPMB), composed of representatives from each
operating unit (program area) and chaired by the Assistant
Administrator for the Office of Management.
D. Participating Organizations
The Department proposes that FSIS be the only agency participating
in this project. The Department and FSIS have determined that employees
in all program areas in the agency, including headquarters and field
employees, will participate, except that all bargaining-unit members
will be excluded. Including all bargaining unit members would cause the
project to exceed the 5,000 limit on the number of participating
employees. Included in the project are all non bargaining-unit
employees located in meat and poultry plants throughout the United
States (excluding intermittent food inspection personnel (GS-1863)
appointed under Schedule A 213.3113(1)(3) and Schedule C employees), 15
District Offices, 3 Field Laboratories, a Technical Service Center in
Omaha NE, a Financial Processing Center in Des Moines IA, a Human
Resources Field Office in Minneapolis MN, as well as all Headquarters
program offices. Each of these units is committed to operating a
credible, robust performance appraisal program aligned to the
organization's strategic goals and objectives. These organizations have
demonstrated this commitment the past two years, as FSIS implemented a
comprehensive performance management training program within the
agency.
E. Participating Employees
The demonstration project covers all General Schedule employees
(with pay plan codes GS and GM) in non-bargaining unit positions. The
excluded bargaining unit positions are nonsupervisory positions in the
food technology (GS-1382), food inspection (GS-1863), and consumer
safety inspection (GS-1862) series and non-bargaining food inspection
(GS-1863) employees appointed under Schedule A 213.3113(1)(3).
Also excluded from coverage of this project are all Senior
Executive Service (SES), Senior Level (SL), and Federal Wage System
(WG) employees, and all Schedule C employees.
Table 1 shows the number of employees subject to coverage under
this project by occupational series and
[[Page 26440]]
grade. The OPM occupational series will be retained for all covered
positions.
Table 1.--Covered Employees, by Series and Grade (as of 01/08/08)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Series 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Total
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0018............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 4 1 ...... ...... 5
0080............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 ...... 1
0099............................................................ ...... ...... ...... 1 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1
0101............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 1
0110............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 4 ...... 5
0199............................................................ ...... ...... ...... 1 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1
0201............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 10 ...... 4 26 41 21 4 106
0203............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... 6 5 17 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 28
0260............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 3 ...... 1 1 8 4 1 18
0299............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 ...... 2 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 3
0301............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 ...... 46 1 1 23 20 19 11 122
0303............................................................ 3 ...... 3 14 9 4 12 ...... 1 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 46
0305............................................................ ...... ...... 1 5 1 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 7
0318............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... 4 16 37 8 4 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 69
0326............................................................ ...... 1 ...... 14 ...... 9 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 24
0335............................................................ ...... ...... ...... 1 ...... 5 1 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 7
0340............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 35 28 63
0341............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 ...... 1 ...... ...... 2
0342............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 ...... ...... ...... 1 1 ...... 3
0343............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 ...... 16 ...... 15 34 52 32 14 164
0344............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 4 35 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 40
0361............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 ...... ...... 1 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 2
0391............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 1 ...... ...... 2
0399............................................................ ...... ...... ...... 1 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1
0401............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 4 1 2 7
0403............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 6 ...... 2 30 35 16 2 91
0404............................................................ ...... ...... 5 2 1 1 8 ...... 11 ...... 2 ...... ...... ...... ...... 30
0414............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 ...... ...... ...... 1
0415............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 2 1 ...... 3
0499............................................................ ...... 1 1 1 1 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 4
0501............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 2 ...... 5 ...... 4 2 6 6 3 28
0503............................................................ ...... ...... ...... 2 22 6 5 3 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 38
0510............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 8 10 3 ...... 21
0544............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 3 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 3
0560............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 ...... ...... 5 3 3 1 13
0561............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1
0599............................................................ ...... ...... ...... 1 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1
0601............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 6 6 1 13
0602............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 ...... 1
0690............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 1 ...... ...... 2
0696............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 2 ...... 3 ...... 14 161 83 2 ...... 265
0699............................................................ ...... ...... ...... 2 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 2
0701............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 74 678 184 25 6 967
0799............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 19 ...... ...... ...... 1 ...... ...... ...... ...... 20
0896............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 1 ...... 2
1035............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 ...... 1 ...... 3 5 7 1 ...... 18
1071............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 2 ...... ...... ...... ...... 2
1084............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 ...... ...... ...... ...... 1
1101............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 3 1 1 5
1102............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 ...... ...... 3 3 2 ...... 9
1301............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 2 2 ...... 4
1311............................................................ ...... ...... ...... 1 1 1 ...... ...... 6 ...... 2 ...... ...... ...... ...... 11
1320............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 2 ...... 5 33 20 6 ...... 66
1382............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 8 3 ...... 11
1412............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 7 1 1 ...... 10
1501............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 3 2 ...... 5
1515............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 1 ...... ...... 2
1529............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 2 1 ...... 3
1654............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 1 1 ...... ...... 3
1701............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 ...... ...... 1
1702............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 ...... 1 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 2
1801............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 ...... 1 ...... 41 71 30 16 2 162
1810............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 6 2 1 ...... 9
1862............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 15 115 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 130
1863............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 4 ...... ...... 5
1899............................................................ ...... ...... ...... 1 1 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 2
2001............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 3 ...... 2 ...... ...... 5
2005............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1
2210............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 2 ...... 2 34 30 18 3 89
2299............................................................ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 3 2 10 47 56 44 148 27 238 2 180 1,137 581 236 80 2,791
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 26441]]
F. Labor Participation
No bargaining-unit employees are covered in this project.
G. Project Design
The project methodology is to introduce into all FSIS program areas
(for covered positions) certain innovations in human resources
management, and to evaluate over time the effects of those innovations
on the ability of the program areas to manage their human resources.
The methodology includes the following steps:
1. Selection of Innovations: The Department and FSIS have
determined that particular pay banding and performance-based pay
progression innovations that are linked to a framework of core
competencies should be included in the proposed project. These
innovations, and the procedures associated with them, are described
below under Pay Banding Classification and Pay System, Performance
Appraisal System, Performance-based Pay Increases and Awards,
Developmental Pay Increases, Staffing and Reduction-in-Force (See
Section III, A through F).
2. Selection of Program Areas: The Department and FSIS have
selected all program areas of the agency for inclusion in the project
since the total number of non-bargaining unit employees is
approximately 2,900 (part-time, full-time, and intermittent) and falls
within the maximum of 5,000 allowed for a demonstration project.
3. Goals and Objectives: The specific project objectives are listed
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION and Executive Summary and are directly
related to the issues identified under Section II.B, Problems with the
Present System.
4. Partnership: The Department and FSIS have limited the covered
workforce to non-bargaining unit positions. Therefore, input from labor
representatives is not required. However, consistent with the policy of
the agency Administrator, FSIS will seek input from two employee
associations whose membership overlaps with the covered workforce.
5. Baseline Evaluation: To provide a basis of comparison between
employee opinions of the current system and their future opinions of
the project system, each employee in the covered program areas will be
asked to complete an opinion questionnaire comparable to the Federal
Human Capital Survey prior to implementation of the project. To
establish a baseline for cost analysis, each operating unit will be
required to analyze its personnel costs during fiscal years 2005, 2006,
and 2007.
6. Training: The agency and the program areas will provide training
to managers, employees, and human resources staff prior to
implementation of the project and will provide additional training to
managers on the pay-for-performance system prior to the end of the
first performance cycle. (See Section IV, Training.)
7. Implementation: To ensure a smooth implementation, the agency
will emphasize top management support; the development of detailed
operating procedures and implementing directives prior to
implementation; thorough training of managers, employees and human
resources staff; step-by-step implementation planning; adequate backup
systems, particularly in automated personnel and payroll systems; and
sufficient operating resources.
8. Program Evaluation: The Department and FSIS will arrange for
periodic evaluation of the project under an OPM-approved evaluation
plan. (See Section VIII, Project Evaluation.) The evaluation will be
designed to determine whether the innovations are achieving project
goals and objectives and are operating within acceptable cost limits.
(See Section IX, Costs.)
III. Personnel System Changes
A. Pay Banding Classification and Pay System
1. Establishment of Career Paths and Pay Bands
In coordination with OPM, FSIS may establish, and adjust over time,
career paths that group one or more occupational categories together
and provide a common pay banding structure ( i.e., a set of work levels
and rate ranges) for occupations within a given career path. Initially,
FSIS intends to establish four career paths as follows:
(a) Professional, Scientific, and Administrative [AP]: Policy,
staff, line, supervisory, and managerial positions in science,
veterinary medicine, consumer safety, food technology, mathematics,
accounting, and other comparable occupations with a positive education
requirement. Examples of occupational series are 0403-Microbiology,
0510-Accounting, 0696-Consumer Safety, 0701-Veterinary Medical Science,
and 1301-General Physical Science. In addition, this career path will
include policy, staff, line, supervisory, and managerial positions in
such fields as finance, procurement, human resources management, public
information, management and program analysis, compliance investigation,
and other two-grade interval occupations that do not maintain a
positive education requirement. Examples of these occupational series
are 0201-Human Resources Management, 0343-Management and Program
Analysis, 1035-Public Affairs.
(b) Supervisory Inspection [AI]: Supervisory positions that direct
the work of inspectors at an import warehouse, a plant, or in a circuit
of plants within a geographic area. These positions are 1862-
Supervisory Consumer Safety Inspectors.
(c) Scientific and Technical Support [AS]: Line positions,
predominantly in agency laboratories, which support professional and
scientific operations. Examples include 0404-Biological Science
Technician, 1311-Physical Science Technician and similar traditional
one-grade interval technician support occupations in agency
laboratories.
(d) Management Support [AO]: Nonsupervisory and supervisory
clerical and assistant positions that support positions not fitting the
definition of any other career paths. Examples include 203-Human
Resources Assistant, 318-Secretary, 326-Office Automation Assistant,
344-Management Assistant and similar traditional one-grade interval
technician and administrative support occupations.
Each career path will be subdivided into pay bands. Each pay band
will correspond to one or more GS grades. Pay bands provide larger
classification targets that can be defined by shorter, simpler and more
understandable classification standards. In coordination with OPM, FSIS
may establish, and adjust over time, a career path's pay band
structure. Initially, the pay bands within each career path and their
relationship to GS grades will be as follows:
[[Page 26442]]
Table 2.--Sample Pay Bands Under PHHRS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Career path Pay band 1 Pay band 2 Pay band 3 Pay band 4 Pay band 5 Pay band 6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative, Professional, GS-1/4 (Student GS-5/7 Trainee.... GS-9/11 GS-12/13 * Full GS-14 Expert...... GS-15 Senior Expert
and Scientific (AP). Trainee). Intermediate. Performance. Pay Band 5S....... Pay Band 6S
GS-13/14 GS-15 Manager
Supervisor.
Supervisory Inspection (AI).... .................. .................. GS-8/9 Supervisory GS-10/11 Senior
Inspectors. Supervisors.
Scientific & Technical (AS).... GS-1/4 (Aide)..... GS-5/6/7 Entry.... GS-8/9 Independent GS-10/11 Expert &
Supervisory.
Management Support (AO)........ GS-1/4 Clerical GS-5/6/7 Assistant GS-8/9/10 Senior
(Entry). or Clerical or Lead
Supervisor. Assistant, and
Supervisor .
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Also includes supervisory positions where the band-controlling work is actually personally performed non-supervisory work.
The final pay banding architecture will be described in
implementing guidance. FSIS will coordinate changes in career paths or
pay banding structures with OPM. After coordination with OPM, FSIS will
give affected employees advance notice and an opportunity to comment
before effecting a change with respect to career paths or pay banding
structure.
2. Position Classification
Occupational groups will be placed in career paths, pay bands will
replace grades, and FSIS pay band standards will replace OPM position
classification standards. The General Schedule occupational series will
be retained.
Each classification standard will describe the threshold of work
encompassed by each pay band based on general duties and
responsibilities, knowledge, skills, and abilities. FSIS will establish
classification standards in consultation with OPM. Positions must meet
or exceed the threshold to be classified into a pay band. These bases
complement each other at each pay band in a career path and may not be
separated in classifying a position. OPM classification standards will
not be used directly, but may be used indirectly to establish
competency criteria that distinguish pay bands or pay levels within a
key career path.
3. Delegation of Classification Authority
The agency has delegated classification authority to SES and GS-15
executives and managers since July 2004. The delegated classification
authority (DCA) provisions of this project continue this initiative and
increase the number of managers who receive classification authority.
Managers must successfully complete DCA training before classification
authority may be exercised. The delegation of classification authority
will be facilitated by the expansion of an intranet-based Position
Description Library, which will include standard descriptions of all
key positions in all career paths and pay bands. Line managers will
utilize this intranet-based Position Description Library to select or
classify most positions. These changes are intended to simplify and
speed up the classification process, make the process more serviceable
and understandable, improve the effectiveness of classification
decision-making and accountability, and facilitate pay for performance.
Implementing guidance will describe the modified DCA policies and
procedures.
4. Classification Appeals
An employee covered by the FSIS Demonstration Project may appeal
the occupational series, official title, or pay band of his or her
position at any time to the agency, Department or directly to the
Office of Personnel Management consistent with procedures currently
prescribed under 5 CFR part 511, subpart F. Implementing guidance will
describe the classification appeals process.
5. Elimination of Fixed Steps
Employees will be converted from existing 15-grade GS position
classification and pay system established under 5 U.S.C. chapter 51 and
chapter 53, subchapter III, to the new pay banding system. The 10 fixed
steps of each GS grade will not apply to employees participating in the
demonstration project. The fixed-step system operates primarily to
reward longevity. A pay banding pay system is an important element of
any effort to make pay more performance-sensitive. No employee's pay
will be reduced as a result of becoming covered by the demonstration
project. (See section V.A.) However, demonstration project employees
will no longer receive longevity-based, within-grade pay increases at
prescribed intervals. Instead, they will be granted annual performance
increases and bonuses as described in section III.C below.
6. Rate Range
The normal minimum and maximum rates of the rate range for each pay
band will equal the applicable step 1 rate and step 10 rate,
respectively, for the lowest and highest grades, respectively, in the
GS that are included in the pay band. The normal minimum and maximum
rates of each band will be increased at the time of a general pay
increase under 5 U.S.C. 5303 so they equal the new minimum and maximum
rates of the grades corresponding to the band.
The minimum rate of the pay band is extended 5 percent below the
normal minimum for employees with a rating of record below Fully
Successful. Such an employee's rate may fall below the normal pay band
minimum when that minimum increases as a result of a pay band
adjustment, but the employee cannot receive a pay increase because the
employee's rating of record is below Fully Successful, as described in
section III.C.4.
The maximum rate of each pay band is extended 5 percent above the
normal maximum for all employees with a rating of record at the highest
level (currently called ``Outstanding'' in FSIS). This feature will
help to ensure that the range of available pay rates will be adequate
to recognize truly outstanding performance. The upper range extension
is reserved for employees with an Outstanding rating. If an employee in
the upper range extension is rated below the
[[Page 26443]]
Outstanding level, special provisions apply, as described in section
III.A.11.
7. Locality Pay
Locality-based comparability payments under 5 U.S.C. 5304 will be
paid on top of the rate of basic pay in the same manner as those
payments apply to GS employees (except as otherwise provided in this
plan). Staffing supplements may apply as described in section III.A.12.
When a locality-based comparability payment established under 5 U.S.C.
5304 is increased, a demonstration project employee whose most recent
rating of record is Fully Successful or higher is entitled to the
increased locality payment.
A demonstration project employee whose most recent rating of record
is below Fully Successful is entitled to the increased locality
payment, but his or her underlying rate of basic pay will be reduced in
a manner that ensures the employee's total rate of pay does not
increase. This reduction is necessary to ensure, in an administratively
feasible way, that an employee rated less than Fully Successful will
not receive a pay increase. It does not constitute a reduction in pay
for purposes of applying the adverse action procedures in chapter 75 of
title 5, United States Code. (Exception: An employee's rate of basic
pay may not be reduced under this paragraph to the extent that the
reduction would cause an employee's rate to fall more than 5 percent
below the normal range minimum.)
A locality rate cap 5 percent higher than the normal EX-IV cap is
established to accommodate those Outstanding performers in the 5
percent upper rate range extension. This higher cap will apply only to
employees receiving a rate within the upper range extension. If the
locality rate for an employee at the normal band maximum is affected by
the EX-IV cap, resulting in an ``effective locality pay percentage''
that is less than the regular locality pay percentage, the locality
rate for an employee in the upper rate range extension of the same band
will be computed using that same effective locality pay percentage.
(For example, if the regular locality pay percentage is 30 percent, but
the EX-IV cap causes the amount of locality pay actually received by an
employee at the normal band maximum to be 20 percent, that effective
locality pay percentage of 20 percent would be used to compute locality
pay for an employee in the upper range extension of the same band.)
8. Rate of Basic Pay Upon Initial Appointment
Upon appointment to a demonstration project position under
Delegated Examining, Direct-Hire Authorization or other authority
primarily designed for initial entry into the Federal service (e.g.,
Veterans Employment Opportunity Act, 30% Disabled Veteran Appointment),
an appointee's rate of basic pay may be set at any rate within the
normal pay band range. In exercising this flexibility, FSIS will
consider the appointee's qualifications, competing job offers, FSIS's
need for the appointee's talents, the appointee's potential
contributions to FSIS mission accomplishment, and the rates received by
on-board employees. This flexibility will allow FSIS to compete more
effectively with private industry for the best talent available.
Implementing guidance will provide managers with assistance in setting
pay to assure fair and equitable treatment of a diverse workforce.
9. Rate of Basic Pay Upon Promotion
Upon promotion to a higher pay band within a career path or to a
pay band in another career path with a higher maximum rate, an
employee's rate of basic pay will be set at a rate within the higher
pay band that provides a pay increase of 8 percent, unless a greater
increase is necessary to set pay at the normal range minimum. (See
section III.E.3 for definition of ``promotion.'') In consultation with
OPM, FSIS may establish exceptions to this policy to deal with
employees receiving a retained rate, employees who are re-promoted
shortly after demotion, employees with exceptional performance
warranting a larger increase with higher-management approval, etc. FSIS
may adopt, in consultation with OPM, policies providing a promotion-
equivalent increase in appropriate circumstances to a Federal employee
outside the demonstration project who accepts a position covered by the
demonstration project.
10. Rate of Basic Pay in Noncompetitive Lateral Actions
Upon non-competitive lateral movement (e.g., via transfer or
reassignment, not conversion of position) to a demonstration project
position from another Federal position, an employee's pay rate
(including any locality payment or staffing supplement) will be set at
an amount that is equal (after any geographic pay conversion) to the
employee's existing pay rate (including any locality payment or
equivalent basic pay supplement), subject to the applicable normal
range maximum. For such an employee moving from a position outside the
demonstration project, FSIS may provide an increase in the rate of
basic pay immediately after movement to reflect the prorated value of
the employee's next scheduled within-grade increase under the former
pay system, consistent with the requirements in section V.A.
11. Other Pay Administration Provisions
Annual performance-based pay increases described in section III.C.3
will be made to the rate of basic pay. These increases are scheduled to
be made on the same date that the annual rate range adjustments
normally take effect--i.e., the first day of the first pay period
beginning on or after January 1. To be eligible for an annual
performance pay increase an employee must have a rating of record of
Fully Successful or higher.
Annual performance awards described in section III.C.5. provide for
lump-sum cash payments recognizing performance and will be made at the
same time as the annual performance pay increase. To be eligible for a
performance award, an employee must have a rating of record of Fully
Successful or higher.
Developmental pay increases described in Section III.D may be paid
no more than once during any 52-week period, following the mid-year
progress review.
The grade retention provisions in 5 U.S.C. 5362 and 5 CFR part 536
are not applicable (i.e., no pay band retention). The pay retention
rules in 5 U.S.C. 5363 and 5 CFR part 536 apply to demonstration
project employees, subject to the following exceptions:
(1) An employee with a rating of record below Fully Successful may
not receive an increase in his or her retained rate under the 50-
percent adjustment rule in 5 U.S.C. 5363(b)(2)(B);
(2) The cap on retained rates is equal to the rate for level IV of
the Executive Schedule plus 5 percent (instead of the EX-IV cap
established in 5 CFR 536.306) in order to accommodate the upper range
extension;
(3) An employee in the upper range extension who is rated below
Outstanding will be converted to a retained rate before processing any
other pay action; and
(4) The range maximum rate used in computing retained rate
adjustments under the 50-percent adjustment rule will be the maximum
rate of the highest applicable rate range (including any applicable
locality payment or staffing
[[Page 26444]]
supplement) taking into consideration an employee's rating of record.
For retained rate employees rated Outstanding, the increase is 50
percent of the dollar change in the applicable adjusted rate for the
upper range extension maximum. (Note that an employee rated Outstanding
must have a retained rate in excess of the upper range extension
maximum adjusted rate, since he or she would otherwise be converted to
a rate within that range extension.) For retained rate employees rated
below Outstanding, the increase is 50 percent of the dollar change in
the applicable adjusted rate for the normal band maximum.
If an employee is receiving a retained rate that is less than the
applicable adjusted maximum rate (including any applicable locality
payment or staffing supplement) for the upper range extension for the
employee's band, and if that employee receives a rating of record of
Outstanding, the employee's retained rate will be terminated and
converted to an equal adjusted rate (base rate in upper range extension
plus applicable locality payment or staffing supplement). This
conversion must be processed before any other pay adjustment.
For a retained rate employee with a rating of record of
Outstanding, if a retained rate increase provided at the time of a
range adjustment results in the retained rate falling below the
applicable adjusted rate for the upper range extension maximum, the
employee's retained rate will be terminated, and the employee's pay
will be set at the maximum rate of the upper range extension.
For a retained rate employee with a rating of record of Fully
Successful or Superior, if a retained rate adjustment provided at the
time of a range adjustment results in the retained rate falling below
the applicable adjusted rate for the normal band maximum, the
employee's retained rate will be terminated, and the employee's pay
will be set at the normal band maximum rate.
For a retained rate employee with a rating of record below Fully
Successful, the retained rate is frozen and not subject to adjustment.
When such an employee's retained rate falls below the applicable
adjusted rate for the normal band maximum, the employee's retained rate
will be terminated, and the employee's pay will be set at an adjusted
rate equal to the retained rate (i.e., the rate is not set at the range
maximum).
As required by 5 CFR 536.304(a)(2) and 536.305(a)(2), any general
pay adjustment, including a retained rate adjustment as described in
the preceding paragraphs, must be processed before any other
simultaneous pay action (such as a geographic pay conversion).
When applicable, the saved pay rules in 5 U.S.C. 3594 and 5 CFR
359.705 for former SES members continue to apply to demonstration
project employees, except that (1) an employee with a rating of record
below Fully Successful may not receive an increase in his or her saved
rate under 5 U.S.C. 3594(c)(2); and (2) the 50-percent adjustment rule
must be applied in the same manner as it is applied for a retained rate
under 5 U.S.C. 5363, subject to the modifications described in the
preceding paragraphs. The rules regarding termination of a saved rate
when it falls below the applicable adjusted maximum rate must be
parallel to those governing termination of a retained rate under 5
U.S.C. 5363, subject to the modifications described in the preceding
paragraphs.
FSIS may adopt supplemental pay administration policies governing
matters not specifically addressed in this plan, subject to any OPM
guidance. In addressing geographic conversions and simultaneous pay
actions, such rules must be consistent with 5 CFR 531.205 and 5 CFR
531.206, respectively.
12. Staffing Supplements
An employee who is assigned to an occupational series and
geographic area covered by an OPM-established special rates schedule,
and who meets any other applicable coverage requirements, will be
entitled to a staffing supplement if the maximum adjusted rate for a
covered position in the GS grades corresponding to the employee's band
is a special rate that exceeds the applicable maximum GS locality rate.
The staffing supplement is added on top of the rate of basic pay in the
same manner as locality pay. An employee will receive the higher of the
applicable locality payment or staffing supplement.
For employees being converted into the demonstration project, the
employee's total pay immediately after conversion will be the same as
immediately before, but a portion of the total will be in the form of a
staffing supplement. Adverse action and pay retention provisions will
not apply to the conversion process as there will be no change in the
total salary rate. The staffing supplement is calculated as described
below.
Upon conversion, the demonstration base rate will be established by
dividing the employee's former GS adjusted rate (the higher of special
rate or locality rate) by the staffing factor. The staffing factor will
be determined by dividing the maximum special rate for the banded
grades by the GS base rate corresponding to that special rate (step 10
GS base rate for the same grade as the special rate). The employee's
demonstration staffing supplement is derived by multiplying the
demonstration base rate by the staffing factor minus one. Therefore,
the employee's final demonstration special staffing rate equals the
demonstration base rate plus the special staffing supplement; this
amount will equal the employee's former GS adjusted rate.
Simplified, the formula is this:
Staffing factor=(Maximum special rate for banded grades)/(GS base rate
corresponding to that special rate)
Demonstration base rate=(Former GS adjusted rate [special or locality
rate])/ (Staffing factor)
Staffing supplement=demonstration base rate x (staffing factor-1)
Salary upon conversion=demonstration base rate + staffing supplement
[sum will equal existing rate]
If a special rate employee is converted to a band where the maximum
GS adjusted rate for the banded grades is a locality rate, when the
employee is converted into the demonstration project, the demonstration
base rate is derived by dividing the employee's former special rate by
the applicable locality pay factor (for example, in the Washington-
Baltimore area, the locality pay factor is 1.2089 in 2008). The
employee's demonstration locality-adjusted rate will equal the
employee's former GS adjusted rate.
Any GS or special rate schedule adjustment will require
recomputation of the staffing supple