Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Model Mystere-Falcon 50 Airplanes, 25984-25986 [E8-9895]
Download as PDF
25984
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 90 / Thursday, May 8, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Credit for Actions Done According to
Previous Revisions of the Service
Information
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
(j) Actions done before the effective date of
this AD in accordance with Boeing 747–100/
200/300/SP Airworthiness Limitations
(AWLs) and Certification Maintenance
Requirements (CMRs), D6–13747–CMR,
Revision March 2006; Revision May 2006;
Revision December 2006; Revision January
2007; Revision September 2007; or Revision
January 2008; are acceptable for compliance
with the corresponding requirements of
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD.
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0118; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–289–AD; Amendment
39–15502; AD 2008–09–21]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Dassault
Model Mystere-Falcon 50 Airplanes
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(k)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
Material Incorporated by Reference
(l) You must use Boeing 747–100/200/300/
SP Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and
Certification Maintenance Requirements
(CMRs), D6–13747–CMR, Revision March
2008, to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124–2207.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information incorporated by reference at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington; or at
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://www.archives.
gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 28,
2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–9896 Filed 5–7–08; 8:45 am]
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 May 07, 2008
Jkt 214001
AGENCY:
This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is
issued following the discovery of a risk of
chafing between an electrical feeder bundle
and a bus bar under the circuit breaker panel.
Most of the time, this possible chafing would
be dormant and would lead to an uneventful
loss of segregation within the different
electrical system components. However,
missing segregation combined with
additional electrical failures may impair
flight safety.
*
*
*
*
*
Chafing between an electrical feeder
bundle and a bus bar under the circuit
breaker panel could lead to electrical
arcing, which could result in smoke and
fire in the cockpit. We are issuing this
AD to require actions to correct the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective June
12, 2008.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of June 12, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–1137;
fax (425) 227–1149.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on February 5, 2008 (73 FR
6620). That NPRM proposed to correct
an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is
issued following the discovery of a risk of
chafing between an electrical feeder bundle
and a bus bar under the circuit breaker panel.
Most of the time, this possible chafing would
be dormant and would lead to an uneventful
loss of segregation within the different
electrical system components. However,
missing segregation combined with
additional electrical failures may impair
flight safety.
This AD mandates inspection of the
electrical feeder bundle, and modification of
its routing under the circuit breaker panel
through implementation of modification
M3093.
Chafing between an electrical feeder
bundle and a bus bar under the circuit
breaker panel could lead to electrical
arcing, which could result in smoke and
fire in the cockpit.
The corrective action includes
repairing or replacing damaged wiring;
re-routing the feeder cables above the
wiring of the ‘‘Avionic Master’’ and
‘‘Aux Bat’’ relays; installing a protective
sheath on the feeder cables; adding
spacers to separate the bus bar wiring
assemblies from the feeder cables; and
adding Teflon protection on the feeder
cables and securing the feeder cables
with wiring retaining strips. You may
obtain further information by examining
the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the NPRM or
on the determination of the cost to the
public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
E:\FR\FM\08MYR1.SGM
08MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 90 / Thursday, May 8, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow our FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
about 76 products of U.S. registry. We
also estimate that it will take about 12
work-hours per product to comply with
the basic requirements of this AD. The
average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Required parts will cost about $0 per
product. Where the service information
lists required parts costs that are
covered under warranty, we have
assumed that there will be no charge for
these parts. As we do not control
warranty coverage for affected parties,
some parties may incur costs higher
than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of this AD
to the U.S. operators to be $72,960, or
$960 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 May 07, 2008
Jkt 214001
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains the NPRM, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
I
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
I
2008–09–21 Dassault Aviation:
Amendment 39–15502. Docket No.
FAA–2008–0118; Directorate Identifier
2007–NM–289–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective June 12, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Dassault Model
Mystere-Falcon 50 airplanes, certificated in
any category, serial number (S/N) 251 and S/
N 253 and subsequent, without modification
M3093 implemented.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 24: Electrical power.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is
issued following the discovery of a risk of
chafing between an electrical feeder bundle
and a bus bar under the circuit breaker panel.
Most of the time, this possible chafing would
be dormant and would lead to an uneventful
loss of segregation within the different
electrical system components. However,
missing segregation combined with
additional electrical failures may impair
flight safety.
This AD mandates inspection of the
electrical feeder bundle, and modification of
its routing under the circuit breaker panel
through implementation of modification
M3093.
Chafing between an electrical feeder bundle
and a bus bar under the circuit breaker panel
could lead to electrical arcing, which could
result in smoke and fire in the cockpit. The
corrective action includes repairing or
replacing damaged wiring; re-routing the
feeder cables above the wiring of the
‘‘Avionic Master’’ and ‘‘Aux Bat’’ relays;
installing a protective sheath on the feeder
cables; adding spacers to separate the bus bar
wiring assemblies from the feeder cables; and
adding Teflon protection on the feeder cables
and securing the feeder cables with wiring
retaining strips.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done: Within 13 months
after the effective date of this AD, inspect for
damage of the electrical feeder bundle; repair
or replace wiring, as applicable; and modify
its routing as detailed in the accomplishment
instructions paragraph of Dassault Service
Bulletin F50–483, dated June 6, 2007,
including Erratum dated July 2007.
FAA AD Differences
I
§ 39.13
25985
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/
or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Tom Rodriguez,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the
FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
E:\FR\FM\08MYR1.SGM
08MYR1
25986
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 90 / Thursday, May 8, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act,
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) Airworthiness
Directive 2007–0175, dated June 28, 2007;
and Dassault Service Bulletin F50–483, dated
June 6, 2007, including Erratum dated July
2007; for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Dassault Service Bulletin
F50–483, dated June 6, 2007, including
Erratum dated July 2007, to do the actions
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box
2000, South Hackensack, New Jersey 07606.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
(202) 741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 23,
2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager,Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–9895 Filed 5–7–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–28384; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–165–AD; Amendment
39–15516; AD 2008–10–10]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 737–600, –700, –700C, –800, and
–900 Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Boeing Model 737–600, –700, –700C,
–800, and –900 series airplanes. This
AD requires revising the Airworthiness
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:31 May 07, 2008
Jkt 214001
Limitations (AWLs) section of the
Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness by incorporating new
limitations for fuel tank systems to
satisfy Special Federal Aviation
Regulation No. 88 requirements. This
AD also requires the initial inspection of
a certain repetitive AWL inspection to
phase in that inspection, and repair if
necessary. This AD results from a design
review of the fuel tank systems. We are
issuing this AD to prevent the potential
for ignition sources inside fuel tanks
caused by latent failures, alterations,
repairs, or maintenance actions, which,
in combination with flammable fuel
vapors, could result in a fuel tank
explosion and consequent loss of the
airplane.
DATES: This AD is effective June 12,
2008.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of June 12, 2008.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone 800–647–5527)
is the Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Samuel Spitzer, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6510; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that would apply to
certain Boeing Model 737–600, –700,
–700C, –800, and –900 series airplanes.
That NPRM was published in the
Federal Register on July 6, 2007 (72 FR
36920). That NPRM proposed to require
revising the Airworthiness Limitations
(AWLs) section of the Instructions for
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Continued Airworthiness (ICA) by
incorporating new limitations for fuel
tank systems to satisfy Special Federal
Aviation Regulation No. 88
requirements. That NPRM also proposed
to require the initial inspection of a
certain repetitive AWL inspection to
phase in that inspection, and repair if
necessary.
Actions Since NPRM Was Issued
Since we issued the NPRM, Boeing
has issued Temporary Revision (TR) 09–
020, dated March 2008. Boeing TR 09–
020 is published as Section 9 of the
Boeing 737–600/700/800/900
Maintenance Planning Data (MPD)
Document, D626A001–CMR, Revision
March 2008 (hereafter referred to as
‘‘Revision March 2008 of the MPD’’).
The NPRM referred to Revision March
2006 of the MPD as the appropriate
source of service information for
accomplishing the proposed actions.
Revision March 2008 of the MPD,
among other actions, includes the
following changes:
• Removes the repetitive task interval
of 36,000 flight cycles from AWLs No.
28–AWL–01 and No. 28–AWL–03.
• Revises the task description for
AWL No. 28–AWL–01 to harmonize it
with AWL No. 28–AWL–02 by removing
references to certain station numbers.
• Revises AWL No. 28–AWL–03 to
reflect the new maximum loop
resistance values associated with the
lightning protection of the
unpressurized fuel quantity indicating
system (FQIS) wire bundle installations.
Accordingly, we have revised
paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this AD to
refer to Revision March 2008 of the
MPD. We also have added a new
paragraph (j) to this AD specifying that
actions done before the effective date of
this AD in accordance with Revisions
March 2006 through February 2008 of
the MPD are acceptable for compliance
with the corresponding requirements of
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD. (In
Revision March 2007 of the MPD,
Boeing revised the document title to
‘‘737–600/700/800/900.’’)
We also have removed reference to
36,000 total flight cycles from paragraph
(h)(1) of this AD and revised the initial
threshold for accomplishing AWL No.
28–AWL–03 to within 120 months since
the date of issuance of the original
standard airworthiness certificate or the
date of issuance of the original export
certificate of airworthiness.
Since publication of Revision March
2006 of the MPD, Boeing has revised the
contents of certain subsections of the
MPD. Information pertaining to the fuel
system AWLs has been removed from
Subsection D, ‘‘AIRWORTHINESS
E:\FR\FM\08MYR1.SGM
08MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 90 (Thursday, May 8, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 25984-25986]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-9895]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-0118; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-289-AD;
Amendment 39-15502; AD 2008-09-21]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Model Mystere-Falcon 50
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is issued following the
discovery of a risk of chafing between an electrical feeder bundle
and a bus bar under the circuit breaker panel. Most of the time,
this possible chafing would be dormant and would lead to an
uneventful loss of segregation within the different electrical
system components. However, missing segregation combined with
additional electrical failures may impair flight safety.
* * * * *
Chafing between an electrical feeder bundle and a bus bar under the
circuit breaker panel could lead to electrical arcing, which could
result in smoke and fire in the cockpit. We are issuing this AD to
require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective June 12, 2008.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of June 12,
2008.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1137; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on February 5, 2008 (73
FR 6620). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is issued following the
discovery of a risk of chafing between an electrical feeder bundle
and a bus bar under the circuit breaker panel. Most of the time,
this possible chafing would be dormant and would lead to an
uneventful loss of segregation within the different electrical
system components. However, missing segregation combined with
additional electrical failures may impair flight safety.
This AD mandates inspection of the electrical feeder bundle, and
modification of its routing under the circuit breaker panel through
implementation of modification M3093.
Chafing between an electrical feeder bundle and a bus bar under the
circuit breaker panel could lead to electrical arcing, which could
result in smoke and fire in the cockpit.
The corrective action includes repairing or replacing damaged
wiring; re-routing the feeder cables above the wiring of the ``Avionic
Master'' and ``Aux Bat'' relays; installing a protective sheath on the
feeder cables; adding spacers to separate the bus bar wiring assemblies
from the feeder cables; and adding Teflon protection on the feeder
cables and securing the feeder cables with wiring retaining strips. You
may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ
[[Page 25985]]
substantively from the information provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect about 76 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it will take about 12 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average
labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $0 per
product. Where the service information lists required parts costs that
are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no
charge for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for
affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated
here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the
U.S. operators to be $72,960, or $960 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2008-09-21 Dassault Aviation: Amendment 39-15502. Docket No. FAA-
2008-0118; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-289-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective June 12,
2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Dassault Model Mystere-Falcon 50
airplanes, certificated in any category, serial number (S/N) 251 and
S/N 253 and subsequent, without modification M3093 implemented.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 24:
Electrical power.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is issued following the
discovery of a risk of chafing between an electrical feeder bundle
and a bus bar under the circuit breaker panel. Most of the time,
this possible chafing would be dormant and would lead to an
uneventful loss of segregation within the different electrical
system components. However, missing segregation combined with
additional electrical failures may impair flight safety.
This AD mandates inspection of the electrical feeder bundle, and
modification of its routing under the circuit breaker panel through
implementation of modification M3093.
Chafing between an electrical feeder bundle and a bus bar under the
circuit breaker panel could lead to electrical arcing, which could
result in smoke and fire in the cockpit. The corrective action
includes repairing or replacing damaged wiring; re-routing the
feeder cables above the wiring of the ``Avionic Master'' and ``Aux
Bat'' relays; installing a protective sheath on the feeder cables;
adding spacers to separate the bus bar wiring assemblies from the
feeder cables; and adding Teflon protection on the feeder cables and
securing the feeder cables with wiring retaining strips.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done: Within 13 months after the effective
date of this AD, inspect for damage of the electrical feeder bundle;
repair or replace wiring, as applicable; and modify its routing as
detailed in the accomplishment instructions paragraph of Dassault
Service Bulletin F50-483, dated June 6, 2007, including Erratum
dated July 2007.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1137; fax (425) 227-1149.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
[[Page 25986]]
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Airworthiness Directive 2007-0175, dated June 28, 2007; and Dassault
Service Bulletin F50-483, dated June 6, 2007, including Erratum
dated July 2007; for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Dassault Service Bulletin F50-483, dated June
6, 2007, including Erratum dated July 2007, to do the actions
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box 2000, South Hackensack, New Jersey
07606.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-
locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 23, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager,Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8-9895 Filed 5-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P