Adequacy Status of Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets in Submitted Early Progress Plan Ventura County 8-Hour Ozone for Transportation Conformity Purposes; California, 24595-24596 [E8-9820]
Download as PDF
24595
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 87 / Monday, May 5, 2008 / Notices
California Air Resources Board as a
revision to the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). As a result
of our adequacy findings, the Southern
California Association of Governments
and the U.S. Department of
Transportation must use these budgets
in future conformity analyses once the
finding becomes effective.
DATES:
This finding is effective May 20,
2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Adrienne Priselac, U.S. EPA, Region IX,
Air Division AIR–2, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105–3901;
(415) 972–3285 or
priselac.adrienne@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
Today’s notice is simply an
announcement of a finding that we have
already made. EPA Region IX sent a
letter to the California Air Resources
Board on April 16, 2008 stating that the
motor vehicle emissions budgets in the
submitted Western Mojave Desert 8hour Ozone Early Progress Plan for 2009
are adequate. The finding is available at
EPA’s conformity Web site: https://
www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/
transconf/adequacy.htm. The adequate
motor vehicle emissions budgets are
provided in the following table:
MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS BUDGETS
Budget year
Volatile organic
compounds 1
(tons per day)
Nitrogen oxides
(tons per day)
2009 .................................................................................................................................................................
22
77
1 The
plan uses a comparable State term, reactive organic gases (ROG).
Transportation conformity is required
by Clean Air Act section 176(c). EPA’s
conformity rule requires that
transportation plans, transportation
improvement programs, and projects
conform to state air quality
implementation plans (SIPs) and
establishes the criteria and procedures
for determining whether or not they do.
Conformity to a SIP means that
transportation activities will not
produce new air quality violations,
worsen existing violations, or delay
timely attainment of the national
ambient air quality standards.
The criteria by which we determine
whether a SIP’s motor vehicle emission
budgets are adequate for conformity
purposes are outlined in 40 CFR
93.118(e)(4). We have described our
process for determining the adequacy of
submitted SIP budgets in our July 1,
2004 preamble starting at 69 FR 40038
and we used the information in these
resources in making our adequacy
determination. Please note that an
adequacy review is separate from EPA’s
completeness review, and should not be
used to prejudge EPA’s ultimate
approval action for the SIP. Even if we
find a budget adequate, the SIP could
later be disapproved.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: April 16, 2008.
Laura Yoshii,
Deputy Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. E8–9822 Filed 5–2–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–R09–OAR–2008–0323; FRL–8561–9]
Adequacy Status of Motor Vehicle
Emissions Budgets in Submitted Early
Progress Plan Ventura County 8-Hour
Ozone for Transportation Conformity
Purposes; California
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of Adequacy.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In this notice, EPA is
notifying the public that the Agency has
found that the motor vehicle emissions
budgets for 8-hour ozone in the Ventura
County 8-hour Ozone Early Progress
Plan are adequate for transportation
conformity purposes. The Ventura
County 8-hour Ozone Early Progress
Plan was submitted to EPA on March
24, 2008 by the California Air Resources
Board as a revision to the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). As a
result of our adequacy findings, the
Southern California Association of
Governments and the U.S. Department
of Transportation must use these
budgets in future conformity analyses
once the finding becomes effective.
DATES: This finding is effective May 20,
2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Adrienne Priselac, U.S. EPA, Region IX,
Air Division AIR–2, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105–3901;
(415) 972–3285 or
priselac.adrienne@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
Today’s notice is simply an
announcement of a finding that we have
already made. EPA Region IX sent a
letter to the California Air Resources
Board on April 16, 2008 stating that the
motor vehicle emissions budgets in the
submitted Ventura County 8-hour
Ozone Early Progress Plan for 2009 are
adequate. The finding is available at
EPA’s conformity Web site: https://
www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/
transconf/adequacy.htm. The adequate
motor vehicle emissions budgets are
provided in the following table:
MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS BUDGETS
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
Budget year
Volatile organic
compounds 1
(tons per day)
Nitrogen oxides
(tons per day)
2009 .................................................................................................................................................................
13
19
1 The
plan uses a comparable State term, reactive organic gases (ROG).
Transportation conformity is required
by Clean Air Act section 176(c). EPA’s
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 May 02, 2008
Jkt 214001
conformity rule requires that
transportation plans, transportation
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
improvement programs, and projects
conform to state air quality
E:\FR\FM\05MYN1.SGM
05MYN1
24596
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 87 / Monday, May 5, 2008 / Notices
implementation plans (SIPs) and
establishes the criteria and procedures
for determining whether or not they do.
Conformity to a SIP means that
transportation activities will not
produce new air quality violations,
worsen existing violations, or delay
timely attainment of the national
ambient air quality standards.
The criteria by which we determine
whether a SIP’s motor vehicle emission
budgets are adequate for conformity
purposes are outlined in 40 CFR
93.118(e)(4). We have described our
process for determining the adequacy of
submitted SIP budgets in our July 1,
2004 preamble starting at 69 FR 40038
and we used the information in these
resources in making our adequacy
determination. Please note that an
adequacy review is separate from EPA’s
completeness review, and should not be
used to prejudge EPA’s ultimate
approval action for the SIP. Even if we
find a budget adequate, the SIP could
later be disapproved.
Open Session:
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
A. Approval of Minutes
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
• April 10, 2008.
A. New Business
• Proposed Rule—Rural Community
Investments.
• Proposed Adoption of the FCA
Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2008–
2013.
A. Reports
• OMS Quarterly Report.
• OE Quarterly Report.
Closed Session*
• Update on OE Oversight Activities.
Dated: April 30, 2008.
Roland E. Smith,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 08–1221 Filed 5–1–08; 2:57 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705–01–P
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: April 16, 2008.
Laura Yoshii,
Deputy Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. E8–9820 Filed 5–2–08; 8:45 am]
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
[Report No. 2864]
Petitions for Reconsideration of Action
in Rulemaking Proceeding
FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION
April 28, 2008.
Farm Credit Administration Board;
Regular Meeting
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given,
pursuant to the Government in the
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of
the regular meeting of the Farm Credit
Administration Board (Board).
DATE AND TIME: The regular meeting of
the Board will be held at the offices of
the Farm Credit Administration in
McLean, Virginia, on May 8, 2008, from
9 a.m. until such time as the Board
concludes its business.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883–
4009, TTY (703) 883–4056.
ADDRESSES: Farm Credit
Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive,
McLean, Virginia 22102–5090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of
this meeting of the Board will be open
to the public (limited space available),
and parts will be closed to the public.
In order to increase the accessibility to
Board meetings, persons requiring
assistance should make arrangements in
advance. The matters to be considered
at the meeting are:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:16 May 02, 2008
Jkt 214001
Petitions for Reconsideration have
been filed in the Commission’s
Rulemaking proceeding listed in this
Public Notice and published pursuant to
47 CFR 1.429(e). The full text of these
documents is available for viewing and
copying in Room CY–B402, 445 12th
Street, SW., Washington, DC or may be
purchased from the Commission’s copy
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc.
(BCPI) (1–800–378–3160). Oppositions
to these petitions must be filed by May
20, 2008. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of the
Commission’s rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1).
Replies to oppositions must be filed
within 10 days after the time for filing
oppositions have expired.
Subject: In the Matter of Advanced
Television Systems and their Impact
Upon the Existing Television Broadcast
Service (MB Docket No. 87–268).
Number of Petitions Filed: 10.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–9750 Filed 5–2–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
*Session Closed—Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552b(c)(8) and (9).
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)
(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part
225), and all other applicable statutes
and regulations to become a bank
holding company and/or to acquire the
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The application also will be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Additional information on all bank
holding companies may be obtained
from the National Information Center
website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than May 30, 2008.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
(Burl Thornton, Assistant Vice
President) 230 South LaSalle Street,
Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
1. First State Bancorporation, Inc.,
Milan, Illinois; to acquire 100 percent of
the voting shares of State Bank of
Colusa, Colusa, Illinois.
2. First State Bancorporation, Inc.,
Milan, Illinois; to become a bank
holding company by acquiring 100
percent of the voting shares of Lamoine
Bancorp, Inc., La Harpe, Illinois, and
thereby indirectly acquire First State
Bank of Western Illinois, La Harpe,
Illinois.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, April 30, 2008.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8–9841 Filed 5–2–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–S
E:\FR\FM\05MYN1.SGM
05MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 87 (Monday, May 5, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24595-24596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-9820]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-R09-OAR-2008-0323; FRL-8561-9]
Adequacy Status of Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets in Submitted
Early Progress Plan Ventura County 8-Hour Ozone for Transportation
Conformity Purposes; California
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of Adequacy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this notice, EPA is notifying the public that the Agency
has found that the motor vehicle emissions budgets for 8-hour ozone in
the Ventura County 8-hour Ozone Early Progress Plan are adequate for
transportation conformity purposes. The Ventura County 8-hour Ozone
Early Progress Plan was submitted to EPA on March 24, 2008 by the
California Air Resources Board as a revision to the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). As a result of our adequacy findings, the
Southern California Association of Governments and the U.S. Department
of Transportation must use these budgets in future conformity analyses
once the finding becomes effective.
DATES: This finding is effective May 20, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adrienne Priselac, U.S. EPA, Region
IX, Air Division AIR-2, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-
3901; (415) 972-3285 or priselac.adrienne@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
Today's notice is simply an announcement of a finding that we have
already made. EPA Region IX sent a letter to the California Air
Resources Board on April 16, 2008 stating that the motor vehicle
emissions budgets in the submitted Ventura County 8-hour Ozone Early
Progress Plan for 2009 are adequate. The finding is available at EPA's
conformity Web site: https://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm. The adequate motor vehicle emissions budgets are provided
in the following table:
Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Volatile organic
Budget year compounds \1\ Nitrogen oxides
(tons per day) (tons per day)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2009.............................. 13 19
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The plan uses a comparable State term, reactive organic gases (ROG).
Transportation conformity is required by Clean Air Act section
176(c). EPA's conformity rule requires that transportation plans,
transportation improvement programs, and projects conform to state air
quality
[[Page 24596]]
implementation plans (SIPs) and establishes the criteria and procedures
for determining whether or not they do. Conformity to a SIP means that
transportation activities will not produce new air quality violations,
worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of the national
ambient air quality standards.
The criteria by which we determine whether a SIP's motor vehicle
emission budgets are adequate for conformity purposes are outlined in
40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). We have described our process for determining the
adequacy of submitted SIP budgets in our July 1, 2004 preamble starting
at 69 FR 40038 and we used the information in these resources in making
our adequacy determination. Please note that an adequacy review is
separate from EPA's completeness review, and should not be used to
prejudge EPA's ultimate approval action for the SIP. Even if we find a
budget adequate, the SIP could later be disapproved.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: April 16, 2008.
Laura Yoshii,
Deputy Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. E8-9820 Filed 5-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P