Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments; Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals and Other Non-Profit Organizations, 24188-24190 [E8-8789]
Download as PDF
24188
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 86 / Friday, May 2, 2008 / Proposed Rules
clarification document published in the
Federal Register issue of January 16,
2008 (73 FR 2854) (FRL–8131-8). In that
document, EPA proposed a clarification
under which activated phosphors that
are not on the TSCA section 8(b)
Chemical Substance Inventory (TSCA
Inventory) would be considered to be
new chemical substances under TSCA
section 5, and thus would be subject to
the notification requirements under
TSCA section 5(a) new chemical
notification requirements. EPA is hereby
reopening the comment period for 30
days, allowing additional comments to
be submitted by June 2, 2008.
To submit comments, or access the
public docket, please follow the detailed
instructions as provided under
ADDRESSES in the January 16, 2008
Federal Register document. If you have
questions, consult the technical person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
List of Subjects 40 CFR Parts 704, 720,
721, and 723
Environmental protection, Chemicals,
Electric lighting industry, Hazardous
substances, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: April 24, 2008.
James B. Gulliford,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances.
[FR Doc. E8–9740 Filed 5–1–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
49 CFR Parts 18 and 19
[Docket OST–2005–22602]
RIN 2105–AD60
Grants and Cooperative Agreements to
State and Local Governments; Grants
and Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals and Other
Non-Profit Organizations
AGENCY:
Office of the Secretary (OST),
DOT.
Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM); request for comments.
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This proposal would amend
Department of Transportation
regulations on uniform administrative
requirements for grants and agreements
with institutions of higher education,
hospitals and other non-profit
organizations. Specifically, the DOT
proposes to make requirements for these
grants and agreements consistent with
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:21 May 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
the uniform administrative
requirements for grants and cooperative
agreements to state and local
governments. In addition, this proposal
would update references to applicable
cost principles for grants and
cooperative agreements with state and
local governments and for grants and
other agreements with institutions of
higher education, hospitals and other
non-profit organizations that appear in
current Department of Transportation
regulations.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before June 16, 2008
ADDRESSES: You may file comments
identified by the docket number DOT–
OST–2007–0022 by any of the following
methods:
Æ Federal eRulemaking Portal: go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Æ Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Ave., SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Æ Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal Holidays.
Æ Fax: (202) 493–2251.
Instructions: You must include the
agency name and docket number DOT–
OST–2007–0022 or the Regulatory
Identification Number (RIN) for the
rulemaking at the beginning of your
comment. All comments received will
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ellen Shields, Office of the Senior
Procurement Executive, Office of
Administration (M–61), (202) 366–4268,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Office
hours are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m.
ET, Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access and Filing
You may submit or retrieve comments
online through the Document
Management System (DMS) at: https://
www.regulations.gov. Acceptable
formats include: MS Word (versions 95
to 97), MS Word for Mac (versions 6 to
8), Rich Text File (RTF), American
Standard Code Information Interchange
(ASCII)(TXT), Portable Document
Format (PDF), and WordPerfect
(versions 7 to 8). This site is available
24 hours each day, 365 days each year.
Electronic submission and retrieval help
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and guidelines are available under the
help section of the web site.
An electronic copy of this document
may also be downloaded by using a
computer, modem and suitable
communications software from the
Government Printing Office’s Electronic
Bulletin Board Service at (202) 512–
1661. Internet users may also reach the
Office of the Federal Register’s home
page at: https://www.nara.gov/fedreg and
the Government Printing Office’s Web
page at: https://www.access.gpo.gov/
nara.
Background
Regulations governing two types of
U.S. Department of Transportation grant
and cooperative agreement recipients
are found in Parts 18 and 19 of Title 49
of the Code of Federal Regulations:
1. 49 CFR Part 18: Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Cooperative
Agreements to State and Local Governments.
2. 49 CFR Part 19: Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Agreements
with Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and Other Non-Profit
Organizations
Both of these parts contain a
provision that governs allowable costs.
However, while 49 CFR 18.22(a)
identifies certain specific limitations on
the use of grant or cooperative
agreement funds by state or local
governments receiving financial
assistance from the U.S. Department of
Transportation, 49 CFR 19.27 does not
contain similar limitations. Specifically,
under 49 CFR 18.22(a), grant funds may
only be used for:
(1) The allowable costs of the grantees,
subgrantees and cost-type contractors,
including allowable costs in the form of
payments to fixed-price contractors; and
(2) Reasonable fees or profit to cost-type
contractors but not any fee or profit (or other
increment above allowable costs) to the
grantee or subgrantee.
This proposal would impose the same
limitation on the use of funds used for
grants and agreements with institutions
of higher education, hospitals, and other
non-profit organizations as there are on
the use of funds used for uniform
administrative requirements for grants
and cooperative agreements to state and
local governments, which are set forth
above.
In addition, this proposal would
update references to applicable cost
principles for grants and cooperative
agreements with state and local
governments that appear in 49 CFR
18.22(b) and include comparable
updated references in 49 CFR 19.27(b)
with regard to grants and agreements
awarded to institutions of higher
education, hospitals, and other non-
E:\FR\FM\02MYP1.SGM
02MYP1
24189
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 86 / Friday, May 2, 2008 / Proposed Rules
profit organizations. These updated
references are necessary in light of the
establishment of title 2 of the Code of
Federal Regulations in 2004. Subtitle A
of title 2 of the Code of Federal
Regulations consists of governmentwide guidance from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) to
Federal agencies for grants and other
financial assistance and
nonprocurement agreements that
previously had been contained in seven
separate OMB circulars and other OMB
policy documents. Currently, 49 CFR
18.22(b) references three specific OMB
circulars that are now codified in
several Parts in chapter II, subtitle A of
title 2 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. This proposal would
amend 49 CFR 18.22(b) by replacing the
citations to these former OMB circulars
with the appropriate references in title
2 of the Code of Federal Regulations and
would reflect these same changes in 49
CFR 19.27(b).
comment period closing date, and
interested persons should continue to
examine the docket for new material. A
final rule may be published at any time
after close of the comment period.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
All comments received before the
close of business on the comment
closing date indicated above will be
considered and will be available for
examination in the docket at the above
address. Comments received after the
comment closing date will be filed in
the docket and will be considered to the
extent practicable. In addition to late
comments, the DOT will also continue
to file relevant information in the docket
as it becomes available after the
This regulatory action does not
contain a Federal mandate that will
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in aggregate, or
by the private sector of $100 million or
more in any one year, as adjusted for
inflation.
Executive Order 12866
The Department has determined that
this rule is nonsignificant. It is purely
administrative in nature and does not
impose new burdens on any parties.
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
The Department certifies that this rule
will not have a significant effect on a
substantial number of small entities.
This is because, as a purely
administrative rule, it does not create
economic effects on anyone. The
amendment would not change or limit
the potential eligibility of any small
entity.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This regulatory action will not impose
any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements covered
under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
For the costs of a
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Parts 18 and
29
Administrative practice and
procedure, Grant programs, Allowable
costs, Cooperative agreements.
Issued on: April 14, 2008.
Mary E. Peters,
Secretary of Transportation.
In consideration of the foregoing, the
DOT proposes to amend, title 49, Code
of Federal Regulations, parts 18 and 19,
as set forth below:
PART 18—UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE
REQUIREMENTS FOR GRANTS AND
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS TO
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
1. The authority citation for part 18
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322(a).
2. In § 18.22(b), revise the table to
read as follows:
§ 18.22
*
Allowable costs.
*
*
(b) * * *
*
*
2 CFR part 225.
2 CFR part 230.
*
*
*
*
*
2 CFR part 220.
48 CFR part 31, Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, or uniform
cost accounting standards that comply with cost principles acceptable to the Federal agency.
4. Revise § 19.27 to read as follows:
PART 19—UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE
REQUIREMENTS FOR GRANTS AND
AGREEMENTS WITH INSTITUTIONS
OF HIGER EDUCATION, HOSPITALS,
AND OTHER NON-PROFIT
ORGANIZATIONS
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS
This regulatory action does not have
Federalism implications, as set forth in
Executive Order 13132. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Use the principles in—
State, local or federal-recognized Indian tribal government ....................
Private non-profit organization other than an (1) institution of higher
education, (2) hospital, or (3) organization named in 2 CFR part 230,
Appendix C, as not subject to that part.
Institutions of higher education ................................................................
For-profit organizations other than a hospital, commercial organization
or a non-profit organization listed in 2 CFR part 230, Appendix C, as
not subject to that part.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
3. The authority citation for part 19
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322(a).
§ 19.27
Allowable costs.
(a) Limitation on use of funds. Grant
funds may be used only for:
(1) The allowable costs of the grantees,
subgrantees and cost-type contractors,
including allowable costs in the form of
payments to fixed-price contractors; and
(2) Reasonable fees or profit to cost-type
contractors but not any fee or profit (or other
increment above allowable costs) to the
grantee or subgrantee.
For the costs of a
Use the principles in—
State, local or federal-recognized Indian tribal government ....................
(b) Applicable cost principles. For
each kind of recipient, there is a set of
Federal principles for determining
allowable costs. Allowability of costs
shall be determined according to the
cost principles applicable to the entity
organization incurring the costs. The
following chart lists the kinds of
organization and the applicable cost
principles:
2 CFR part 225.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:21 May 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\02MYP1.SGM
02MYP1
24190
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 86 / Friday, May 2, 2008 / Proposed Rules
For the costs of a
Use the principles in—
Private non-profit organization other than an (1) institution of higher
education, (2) hospital, or (3) organization named in 2 CFR part 230,
Appendix C, as not subject to that circular.
Institutions of higher education ................................................................
Hospitals ...................................................................................................
2 CFR part 230.
For-profit organizations other than a hospital, commercial organization
or a non-profit organization listed in 2 CFR part 230, Appendix C, as
not subject to that part.
[FR Doc. E8–8789 Filed 5–1–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Parts 531 and 533
[Docket No. NHTSA–2008–0069]
Passenger Car Average Fuel Economy
Standards—Model Years 2008–2020
and Light Truck Average Fuel
Economy Standards—Model Years
2008–2020; Request for Product Plan
Information
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Request for comments.
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The purpose of this request
for comments is to acquire new and
updated information regarding vehicle
manufacturers’ future product plans to
assist the agency in analyzing the
proposed passenger car and light truck
corporate average fuel economy (CAFE)
standards as required by the Energy
Policy and Conservation Act, as
amended by the Energy Independence
and Security Act (EISA) of 2007, Pub. L.
110–140. This proposal is discussed in
a companion notice published today.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 1, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
[identified by Docket No. NHTSA–
2008–0069] by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., between
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:21 May 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
2 CFR part 220.
45 CFR part 74, Appendix E, ‘‘Principles for Determining Costs Applicable to Research and Development under Grants and Contracts
with Hospitals.’’
48 CFR part 31, Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, or uniform
cost accounting standards that comply with cost principles acceptable to the Federal agency.
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
Telephone: 1–800–647–5527.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number for this proposed collection of
information. Note that all comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Please see the Privacy Act heading
below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78) or you may visit https://
www.dot.gov/privacy.html.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the
online instructions, or visit the Docket
Management Facility at the street
address listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
non-legal issues, call Ken Katz, Lead
Engineer, Fuel Economy Division,
Office of International Policy, Fuel
Economy and Consumer Programs, at
(202) 366–0846, facsimile (202) 493–
2290, electronic mail ken.katz@dot.gov.
For legal issues, call Rebecca Schade,
Office of the Chief Counsel, at (202)
366–2992.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
In December 1975, during the
aftermath of the energy crisis created by
the oil embargo of 1973–74, Congress
enacted the Energy Policy and
Conservation Act (EPCA). The Act
established an automotive fuel economy
regulatory program by adding Title V,
‘‘Improving Automotive Efficiency,’’ to
the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost
Saving Act. Title V has been amended
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
from time to time and codified without
substantive change as Chapter 329 of
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Chapter 329 provides for the issuance of
average fuel economy standards for
passenger automobiles (passenger cars)
and automobiles that are not passenger
automobiles (light trucks).
Section 32902(a) of Chapter 329 states
that the Secretary of Transportation
shall prescribe by regulation corporate
average fuel economy (CAFE) standards
for passenger cars for each model year.
That section also states that ‘‘[e]ach
standard shall be the maximum feasible
average fuel economy level that the
Secretary decides the manufacturers can
achieve in that model year.’’ The
Secretary has delegated the authority to
implement the automotive fuel economy
program to the Administrator of
NHTSA. 49 CFR 1.50(f). Section
32902(f) provides that, in determining
the maximum feasible average fuel
economy level, we shall consider four
criteria: Technological feasibility,
economic practicability, the effect of
other motor vehicle standards of the
Government on fuel economy, and the
need of the United States to conserve
energy.
Congress enacted the Energy
Independence and Security Act of 2007
(EISA) on December 18, 2007, which
further amends Chapter 329 of Title 49.
EISA made a number of important
changes to EPCA, including:
• Replacing the old statutory default
standard of 27.5 mpg for passenger
automobiles with a mandate to establish
passenger automobile and light truck
standards, beginning with model year
(MY) 2011, set sufficiently high to
ensure that the average fuel economy of
the combined industry wide fleet of all
new passenger automobiles and light
trucks sold in the United States during
MY 2020 is at least 35 mpg.
• Limiting to five the number of years
for which standards can be established
in a single rulemaking.
• Mandating the reforming of CAFE
standards for passenger cars by
requiring that all CAFE standards be
based on one or more vehicle attributes,
E:\FR\FM\02MYP1.SGM
02MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 86 (Friday, May 2, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 24188-24190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-8789]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
49 CFR Parts 18 and 19
[Docket OST-2005-22602]
RIN 2105-AD60
Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments;
Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals
and Other Non-Profit Organizations
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary (OST), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposal would amend Department of Transportation
regulations on uniform administrative requirements for grants and
agreements with institutions of higher education, hospitals and other
non-profit organizations. Specifically, the DOT proposes to make
requirements for these grants and agreements consistent with the
uniform administrative requirements for grants and cooperative
agreements to state and local governments. In addition, this proposal
would update references to applicable cost principles for grants and
cooperative agreements with state and local governments and for grants
and other agreements with institutions of higher education, hospitals
and other non-profit organizations that appear in current Department of
Transportation regulations.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 16, 2008
ADDRESSES: You may file comments identified by the docket number DOT-
OST-2007-0022 by any of the following methods:
[cir] Federal eRulemaking Portal: go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
[cir] Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
[cir] Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
[cir] Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Instructions: You must include the agency name and docket number
DOT-OST-2007-0022 or the Regulatory Identification Number (RIN) for the
rulemaking at the beginning of your comment. All comments received will
be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Shields, Office of the Senior
Procurement Executive, Office of Administration (M-61), (202) 366-4268,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours
are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access and Filing
You may submit or retrieve comments online through the Document
Management System (DMS) at: https://www.regulations.gov. Acceptable
formats include: MS Word (versions 95 to 97), MS Word for Mac (versions
6 to 8), Rich Text File (RTF), American Standard Code Information
Interchange (ASCII)(TXT), Portable Document Format (PDF), and
WordPerfect (versions 7 to 8). This site is available 24 hours each
day, 365 days each year. Electronic submission and retrieval help and
guidelines are available under the help section of the web site.
An electronic copy of this document may also be downloaded by using
a computer, modem and suitable communications software from the
Government Printing Office's Electronic Bulletin Board Service at (202)
512-1661. Internet users may also reach the Office of the Federal
Register's home page at: https://www.nara.gov/fedreg and the Government
Printing Office's Web page at: https://www.access.gpo.gov/nara.
Background
Regulations governing two types of U.S. Department of
Transportation grant and cooperative agreement recipients are found in
Parts 18 and 19 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations:
1. 49 CFR Part 18: Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments.
2. 49 CFR Part 19: Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and Other Non-Profit Organizations
Both of these parts contain a provision that governs allowable
costs. However, while 49 CFR 18.22(a) identifies certain specific
limitations on the use of grant or cooperative agreement funds by state
or local governments receiving financial assistance from the U.S.
Department of Transportation, 49 CFR 19.27 does not contain similar
limitations. Specifically, under 49 CFR 18.22(a), grant funds may only
be used for:
(1) The allowable costs of the grantees, subgrantees and cost-
type contractors, including allowable costs in the form of payments
to fixed-price contractors; and
(2) Reasonable fees or profit to cost-type contractors but not
any fee or profit (or other increment above allowable costs) to the
grantee or subgrantee.
This proposal would impose the same limitation on the use of funds
used for grants and agreements with institutions of higher education,
hospitals, and other non-profit organizations as there are on the use
of funds used for uniform administrative requirements for grants and
cooperative agreements to state and local governments, which are set
forth above.
In addition, this proposal would update references to applicable
cost principles for grants and cooperative agreements with state and
local governments that appear in 49 CFR 18.22(b) and include comparable
updated references in 49 CFR 19.27(b) with regard to grants and
agreements awarded to institutions of higher education, hospitals, and
other non-
[[Page 24189]]
profit organizations. These updated references are necessary in light
of the establishment of title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations in
2004. Subtitle A of title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations consists
of government-wide guidance from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) to Federal agencies for grants and other financial assistance and
nonprocurement agreements that previously had been contained in seven
separate OMB circulars and other OMB policy documents. Currently, 49
CFR 18.22(b) references three specific OMB circulars that are now
codified in several Parts in chapter II, subtitle A of title 2 of the
Code of Federal Regulations. This proposal would amend 49 CFR 18.22(b)
by replacing the citations to these former OMB circulars with the
appropriate references in title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations
and would reflect these same changes in 49 CFR 19.27(b).
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
All comments received before the close of business on the comment
closing date indicated above will be considered and will be available
for examination in the docket at the above address. Comments received
after the comment closing date will be filed in the docket and will be
considered to the extent practicable. In addition to late comments, the
DOT will also continue to file relevant information in the docket as it
becomes available after the comment period closing date, and interested
persons should continue to examine the docket for new material. A final
rule may be published at any time after close of the comment period.
Executive Order 12866
The Department has determined that this rule is nonsignificant. It
is purely administrative in nature and does not impose new burdens on
any parties.
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
The Department certifies that this rule will not have a significant
effect on a substantial number of small entities. This is because, as a
purely administrative rule, it does not create economic effects on
anyone. The amendment would not change or limit the potential
eligibility of any small entity.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This regulatory action does not contain a Federal mandate that will
result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in
aggregate, or by the private sector of $100 million or more in any one
year, as adjusted for inflation.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This regulatory action will not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements covered under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
This regulatory action does not have Federalism implications, as
set forth in Executive Order 13132. It will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Parts 18 and 29
Administrative practice and procedure, Grant programs, Allowable
costs, Cooperative agreements.
Issued on: April 14, 2008.
Mary E. Peters,
Secretary of Transportation.
In consideration of the foregoing, the DOT proposes to amend, title
49, Code of Federal Regulations, parts 18 and 19, as set forth below:
PART 18--UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR GRANTS AND
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
1. The authority citation for part 18 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322(a).
2. In Sec. 18.22(b), revise the table to read as follows:
Sec. 18.22 Allowable costs.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the costs of a Use the principles in--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State, local or federal-recognized 2 CFR part 225.
Indian tribal government.
Private non-profit organization other 2 CFR part 230.
than an (1) institution of higher
education, (2) hospital, or (3)
organization named in 2 CFR part 230,
Appendix C, as not subject to that
part.
Institutions of higher education....... 2 CFR part 220.
For-profit organizations other than a 48 CFR part 31, Contract Cost
hospital, commercial organization or a Principles and Procedures, or
non-profit organization listed in 2 uniform cost accounting
CFR part 230, Appendix C, as not standards that comply with
subject to that part. cost principles acceptable to
the Federal agency.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
PART 19--UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR GRANTS AND
AGREEMENTS WITH INSTITUTIONS OF HIGER EDUCATION, HOSPITALS, AND
OTHER NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS
3. The authority citation for part 19 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322(a).
4. Revise Sec. 19.27 to read as follows:
Sec. 19.27 Allowable costs.
(a) Limitation on use of funds. Grant funds may be used only for:
(1) The allowable costs of the grantees, subgrantees and cost-
type contractors, including allowable costs in the form of payments
to fixed-price contractors; and
(2) Reasonable fees or profit to cost-type contractors but not
any fee or profit (or other increment above allowable costs) to the
grantee or subgrantee.
(b) Applicable cost principles. For each kind of recipient, there
is a set of Federal principles for determining allowable costs.
Allowability of costs shall be determined according to the cost
principles applicable to the entity organization incurring the costs.
The following chart lists the kinds of organization and the applicable
cost principles:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the costs of a Use the principles in--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State, local or federal-recognized 2 CFR part 225.
Indian tribal government.
[[Page 24190]]
Private non-profit organization other 2 CFR part 230.
than an (1) institution of higher
education, (2) hospital, or (3)
organization named in 2 CFR part 230,
Appendix C, as not subject to that
circular.
Institutions of higher education....... 2 CFR part 220.
Hospitals.............................. 45 CFR part 74, Appendix E,
``Principles for Determining
Costs Applicable to Research
and Development under Grants
and Contracts with
Hospitals.''
For-profit organizations other than a 48 CFR part 31, Contract Cost
hospital, commercial organization or a Principles and Procedures, or
non-profit organization listed in 2 uniform cost accounting
CFR part 230, Appendix C, as not standards that comply with
subject to that part. cost principles acceptable to
the Federal agency.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. E8-8789 Filed 5-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P