Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments; Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals and Other Non-Profit Organizations, 24188-24190 [E8-8789]

Download as PDF 24188 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 86 / Friday, May 2, 2008 / Proposed Rules clarification document published in the Federal Register issue of January 16, 2008 (73 FR 2854) (FRL–8131-8). In that document, EPA proposed a clarification under which activated phosphors that are not on the TSCA section 8(b) Chemical Substance Inventory (TSCA Inventory) would be considered to be new chemical substances under TSCA section 5, and thus would be subject to the notification requirements under TSCA section 5(a) new chemical notification requirements. EPA is hereby reopening the comment period for 30 days, allowing additional comments to be submitted by June 2, 2008. To submit comments, or access the public docket, please follow the detailed instructions as provided under ADDRESSES in the January 16, 2008 Federal Register document. If you have questions, consult the technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. List of Subjects 40 CFR Parts 704, 720, 721, and 723 Environmental protection, Chemicals, Electric lighting industry, Hazardous substances, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: April 24, 2008. James B. Gulliford, Assistant Administrator, Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances. [FR Doc. E8–9740 Filed 5–1–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–S DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office of the Secretary 49 CFR Parts 18 and 19 [Docket OST–2005–22602] RIN 2105–AD60 Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments; Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals and Other Non-Profit Organizations AGENCY: Office of the Secretary (OST), DOT. Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); request for comments. ebenthall on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS ACTION: SUMMARY: This proposal would amend Department of Transportation regulations on uniform administrative requirements for grants and agreements with institutions of higher education, hospitals and other non-profit organizations. Specifically, the DOT proposes to make requirements for these grants and agreements consistent with VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:21 May 01, 2008 Jkt 214001 the uniform administrative requirements for grants and cooperative agreements to state and local governments. In addition, this proposal would update references to applicable cost principles for grants and cooperative agreements with state and local governments and for grants and other agreements with institutions of higher education, hospitals and other non-profit organizations that appear in current Department of Transportation regulations. DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 16, 2008 ADDRESSES: You may file comments identified by the docket number DOT– OST–2007–0022 by any of the following methods: Æ Federal eRulemaking Portal: go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Æ Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590–0001. Æ Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays. Æ Fax: (202) 493–2251. Instructions: You must include the agency name and docket number DOT– OST–2007–0022 or the Regulatory Identification Number (RIN) for the rulemaking at the beginning of your comment. All comments received will be posted without change to https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Shields, Office of the Senior Procurement Executive, Office of Administration (M–61), (202) 366–4268, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001. Office hours are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Electronic Access and Filing You may submit or retrieve comments online through the Document Management System (DMS) at: https:// www.regulations.gov. Acceptable formats include: MS Word (versions 95 to 97), MS Word for Mac (versions 6 to 8), Rich Text File (RTF), American Standard Code Information Interchange (ASCII)(TXT), Portable Document Format (PDF), and WordPerfect (versions 7 to 8). This site is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. Electronic submission and retrieval help PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 and guidelines are available under the help section of the web site. An electronic copy of this document may also be downloaded by using a computer, modem and suitable communications software from the Government Printing Office’s Electronic Bulletin Board Service at (202) 512– 1661. Internet users may also reach the Office of the Federal Register’s home page at: https://www.nara.gov/fedreg and the Government Printing Office’s Web page at: https://www.access.gpo.gov/ nara. Background Regulations governing two types of U.S. Department of Transportation grant and cooperative agreement recipients are found in Parts 18 and 19 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations: 1. 49 CFR Part 18: Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments. 2. 49 CFR Part 19: Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Non-Profit Organizations Both of these parts contain a provision that governs allowable costs. However, while 49 CFR 18.22(a) identifies certain specific limitations on the use of grant or cooperative agreement funds by state or local governments receiving financial assistance from the U.S. Department of Transportation, 49 CFR 19.27 does not contain similar limitations. Specifically, under 49 CFR 18.22(a), grant funds may only be used for: (1) The allowable costs of the grantees, subgrantees and cost-type contractors, including allowable costs in the form of payments to fixed-price contractors; and (2) Reasonable fees or profit to cost-type contractors but not any fee or profit (or other increment above allowable costs) to the grantee or subgrantee. This proposal would impose the same limitation on the use of funds used for grants and agreements with institutions of higher education, hospitals, and other non-profit organizations as there are on the use of funds used for uniform administrative requirements for grants and cooperative agreements to state and local governments, which are set forth above. In addition, this proposal would update references to applicable cost principles for grants and cooperative agreements with state and local governments that appear in 49 CFR 18.22(b) and include comparable updated references in 49 CFR 19.27(b) with regard to grants and agreements awarded to institutions of higher education, hospitals, and other non- E:\FR\FM\02MYP1.SGM 02MYP1 24189 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 86 / Friday, May 2, 2008 / Proposed Rules profit organizations. These updated references are necessary in light of the establishment of title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations in 2004. Subtitle A of title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations consists of governmentwide guidance from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to Federal agencies for grants and other financial assistance and nonprocurement agreements that previously had been contained in seven separate OMB circulars and other OMB policy documents. Currently, 49 CFR 18.22(b) references three specific OMB circulars that are now codified in several Parts in chapter II, subtitle A of title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations. This proposal would amend 49 CFR 18.22(b) by replacing the citations to these former OMB circulars with the appropriate references in title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations and would reflect these same changes in 49 CFR 19.27(b). comment period closing date, and interested persons should continue to examine the docket for new material. A final rule may be published at any time after close of the comment period. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices All comments received before the close of business on the comment closing date indicated above will be considered and will be available for examination in the docket at the above address. Comments received after the comment closing date will be filed in the docket and will be considered to the extent practicable. In addition to late comments, the DOT will also continue to file relevant information in the docket as it becomes available after the This regulatory action does not contain a Federal mandate that will result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in aggregate, or by the private sector of $100 million or more in any one year, as adjusted for inflation. Executive Order 12866 The Department has determined that this rule is nonsignificant. It is purely administrative in nature and does not impose new burdens on any parties. Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 The Department certifies that this rule will not have a significant effect on a substantial number of small entities. This is because, as a purely administrative rule, it does not create economic effects on anyone. The amendment would not change or limit the potential eligibility of any small entity. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 This regulatory action will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements covered under the Paperwork Reduction Act. For the costs of a List of Subjects in 49 CFR Parts 18 and 29 Administrative practice and procedure, Grant programs, Allowable costs, Cooperative agreements. Issued on: April 14, 2008. Mary E. Peters, Secretary of Transportation. In consideration of the foregoing, the DOT proposes to amend, title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, parts 18 and 19, as set forth below: PART 18—UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR GRANTS AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS 1. The authority citation for part 18 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322(a). 2. In § 18.22(b), revise the table to read as follows: § 18.22 * Allowable costs. * * (b) * * * * * 2 CFR part 225. 2 CFR part 230. * * * * * 2 CFR part 220. 48 CFR part 31, Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, or uniform cost accounting standards that comply with cost principles acceptable to the Federal agency. 4. Revise § 19.27 to read as follows: PART 19—UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS WITH INSTITUTIONS OF HIGER EDUCATION, HOSPITALS, AND OTHER NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS ebenthall on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS This regulatory action does not have Federalism implications, as set forth in Executive Order 13132. It will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Use the principles in— State, local or federal-recognized Indian tribal government .................... Private non-profit organization other than an (1) institution of higher education, (2) hospital, or (3) organization named in 2 CFR part 230, Appendix C, as not subject to that part. Institutions of higher education ................................................................ For-profit organizations other than a hospital, commercial organization or a non-profit organization listed in 2 CFR part 230, Appendix C, as not subject to that part. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism) 3. The authority citation for part 19 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322(a). § 19.27 Allowable costs. (a) Limitation on use of funds. Grant funds may be used only for: (1) The allowable costs of the grantees, subgrantees and cost-type contractors, including allowable costs in the form of payments to fixed-price contractors; and (2) Reasonable fees or profit to cost-type contractors but not any fee or profit (or other increment above allowable costs) to the grantee or subgrantee. For the costs of a Use the principles in— State, local or federal-recognized Indian tribal government .................... (b) Applicable cost principles. For each kind of recipient, there is a set of Federal principles for determining allowable costs. Allowability of costs shall be determined according to the cost principles applicable to the entity organization incurring the costs. The following chart lists the kinds of organization and the applicable cost principles: 2 CFR part 225. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:21 May 01, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\02MYP1.SGM 02MYP1 24190 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 86 / Friday, May 2, 2008 / Proposed Rules For the costs of a Use the principles in— Private non-profit organization other than an (1) institution of higher education, (2) hospital, or (3) organization named in 2 CFR part 230, Appendix C, as not subject to that circular. Institutions of higher education ................................................................ Hospitals ................................................................................................... 2 CFR part 230. For-profit organizations other than a hospital, commercial organization or a non-profit organization listed in 2 CFR part 230, Appendix C, as not subject to that part. [FR Doc. E8–8789 Filed 5–1–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 49 CFR Parts 531 and 533 [Docket No. NHTSA–2008–0069] Passenger Car Average Fuel Economy Standards—Model Years 2008–2020 and Light Truck Average Fuel Economy Standards—Model Years 2008–2020; Request for Product Plan Information National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Request for comments. ebenthall on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS AGENCY: SUMMARY: The purpose of this request for comments is to acquire new and updated information regarding vehicle manufacturers’ future product plans to assist the agency in analyzing the proposed passenger car and light truck corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards as required by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended by the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007, Pub. L. 110–140. This proposal is discussed in a companion notice published today. DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 1, 2008. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments [identified by Docket No. NHTSA– 2008–0069] by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. • Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590. • Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., between VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:21 May 01, 2008 Jkt 214001 2 CFR part 220. 45 CFR part 74, Appendix E, ‘‘Principles for Determining Costs Applicable to Research and Development under Grants and Contracts with Hospitals.’’ 48 CFR part 31, Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, or uniform cost accounting standards that comply with cost principles acceptable to the Federal agency. 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Telephone: 1–800–647–5527. • Fax: 202–493–2251. Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and docket number for this proposed collection of information. Note that all comments received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading below. Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–78) or you may visit https:// www.dot.gov/privacy.html. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to https:// www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions, or visit the Docket Management Facility at the street address listed above. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For non-legal issues, call Ken Katz, Lead Engineer, Fuel Economy Division, Office of International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, at (202) 366–0846, facsimile (202) 493– 2290, electronic mail ken.katz@dot.gov. For legal issues, call Rebecca Schade, Office of the Chief Counsel, at (202) 366–2992. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Introduction In December 1975, during the aftermath of the energy crisis created by the oil embargo of 1973–74, Congress enacted the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA). The Act established an automotive fuel economy regulatory program by adding Title V, ‘‘Improving Automotive Efficiency,’’ to the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Saving Act. Title V has been amended PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 from time to time and codified without substantive change as Chapter 329 of Title 49 of the United States Code. Chapter 329 provides for the issuance of average fuel economy standards for passenger automobiles (passenger cars) and automobiles that are not passenger automobiles (light trucks). Section 32902(a) of Chapter 329 states that the Secretary of Transportation shall prescribe by regulation corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards for passenger cars for each model year. That section also states that ‘‘[e]ach standard shall be the maximum feasible average fuel economy level that the Secretary decides the manufacturers can achieve in that model year.’’ The Secretary has delegated the authority to implement the automotive fuel economy program to the Administrator of NHTSA. 49 CFR 1.50(f). Section 32902(f) provides that, in determining the maximum feasible average fuel economy level, we shall consider four criteria: Technological feasibility, economic practicability, the effect of other motor vehicle standards of the Government on fuel economy, and the need of the United States to conserve energy. Congress enacted the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) on December 18, 2007, which further amends Chapter 329 of Title 49. EISA made a number of important changes to EPCA, including: • Replacing the old statutory default standard of 27.5 mpg for passenger automobiles with a mandate to establish passenger automobile and light truck standards, beginning with model year (MY) 2011, set sufficiently high to ensure that the average fuel economy of the combined industry wide fleet of all new passenger automobiles and light trucks sold in the United States during MY 2020 is at least 35 mpg. • Limiting to five the number of years for which standards can be established in a single rulemaking. • Mandating the reforming of CAFE standards for passenger cars by requiring that all CAFE standards be based on one or more vehicle attributes, E:\FR\FM\02MYP1.SGM 02MYP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 86 (Friday, May 2, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 24188-24190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-8789]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

49 CFR Parts 18 and 19

[Docket OST-2005-22602]
RIN 2105-AD60


Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments; 
Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals 
and Other Non-Profit Organizations

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary (OST), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This proposal would amend Department of Transportation 
regulations on uniform administrative requirements for grants and 
agreements with institutions of higher education, hospitals and other 
non-profit organizations. Specifically, the DOT proposes to make 
requirements for these grants and agreements consistent with the 
uniform administrative requirements for grants and cooperative 
agreements to state and local governments. In addition, this proposal 
would update references to applicable cost principles for grants and 
cooperative agreements with state and local governments and for grants 
and other agreements with institutions of higher education, hospitals 
and other non-profit organizations that appear in current Department of 
Transportation regulations.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 16, 2008

ADDRESSES: You may file comments identified by the docket number DOT-
OST-2007-0022 by any of the following methods:
    [cir] Federal eRulemaking Portal: go to https://www.regulations.gov 
and follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
    [cir] Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of 
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., West Building Ground Floor, 
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    [cir] Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room 
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, 
Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
    [cir] Fax: (202) 493-2251.
    Instructions: You must include the agency name and docket number 
DOT-OST-2007-0022 or the Regulatory Identification Number (RIN) for the 
rulemaking at the beginning of your comment. All comments received will 
be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any 
personal information provided.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Shields, Office of the Senior 
Procurement Executive, Office of Administration (M-61), (202) 366-4268, 
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours 
are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday, except 
Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Electronic Access and Filing

    You may submit or retrieve comments online through the Document 
Management System (DMS) at: https://www.regulations.gov. Acceptable 
formats include: MS Word (versions 95 to 97), MS Word for Mac (versions 
6 to 8), Rich Text File (RTF), American Standard Code Information 
Interchange (ASCII)(TXT), Portable Document Format (PDF), and 
WordPerfect (versions 7 to 8). This site is available 24 hours each 
day, 365 days each year. Electronic submission and retrieval help and 
guidelines are available under the help section of the web site.
    An electronic copy of this document may also be downloaded by using 
a computer, modem and suitable communications software from the 
Government Printing Office's Electronic Bulletin Board Service at (202) 
512-1661. Internet users may also reach the Office of the Federal 
Register's home page at: https://www.nara.gov/fedreg and the Government 
Printing Office's Web page at: https://www.access.gpo.gov/nara.

Background

    Regulations governing two types of U.S. Department of 
Transportation grant and cooperative agreement recipients are found in 
Parts 18 and 19 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations:

    1. 49 CFR Part 18: Uniform Administrative Requirements for 
Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments.
    2. 49 CFR Part 19: Uniform Administrative Requirements for 
Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, 
Hospitals, and Other Non-Profit Organizations

    Both of these parts contain a provision that governs allowable 
costs. However, while 49 CFR 18.22(a) identifies certain specific 
limitations on the use of grant or cooperative agreement funds by state 
or local governments receiving financial assistance from the U.S. 
Department of Transportation, 49 CFR 19.27 does not contain similar 
limitations. Specifically, under 49 CFR 18.22(a), grant funds may only 
be used for:

    (1) The allowable costs of the grantees, subgrantees and cost-
type contractors, including allowable costs in the form of payments 
to fixed-price contractors; and
    (2) Reasonable fees or profit to cost-type contractors but not 
any fee or profit (or other increment above allowable costs) to the 
grantee or subgrantee.

    This proposal would impose the same limitation on the use of funds 
used for grants and agreements with institutions of higher education, 
hospitals, and other non-profit organizations as there are on the use 
of funds used for uniform administrative requirements for grants and 
cooperative agreements to state and local governments, which are set 
forth above.
    In addition, this proposal would update references to applicable 
cost principles for grants and cooperative agreements with state and 
local governments that appear in 49 CFR 18.22(b) and include comparable 
updated references in 49 CFR 19.27(b) with regard to grants and 
agreements awarded to institutions of higher education, hospitals, and 
other non-

[[Page 24189]]

profit organizations. These updated references are necessary in light 
of the establishment of title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations in 
2004. Subtitle A of title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations consists 
of government-wide guidance from the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) to Federal agencies for grants and other financial assistance and 
nonprocurement agreements that previously had been contained in seven 
separate OMB circulars and other OMB policy documents. Currently, 49 
CFR 18.22(b) references three specific OMB circulars that are now 
codified in several Parts in chapter II, subtitle A of title 2 of the 
Code of Federal Regulations. This proposal would amend 49 CFR 18.22(b) 
by replacing the citations to these former OMB circulars with the 
appropriate references in title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations 
and would reflect these same changes in 49 CFR 19.27(b).

Rulemaking Analyses and Notices

    All comments received before the close of business on the comment 
closing date indicated above will be considered and will be available 
for examination in the docket at the above address. Comments received 
after the comment closing date will be filed in the docket and will be 
considered to the extent practicable. In addition to late comments, the 
DOT will also continue to file relevant information in the docket as it 
becomes available after the comment period closing date, and interested 
persons should continue to examine the docket for new material. A final 
rule may be published at any time after close of the comment period.

Executive Order 12866

    The Department has determined that this rule is nonsignificant. It 
is purely administrative in nature and does not impose new burdens on 
any parties.

Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980

    The Department certifies that this rule will not have a significant 
effect on a substantial number of small entities. This is because, as a 
purely administrative rule, it does not create economic effects on 
anyone. The amendment would not change or limit the potential 
eligibility of any small entity.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

    This regulatory action does not contain a Federal mandate that will 
result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in 
aggregate, or by the private sector of $100 million or more in any one 
year, as adjusted for inflation.

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This regulatory action will not impose any additional reporting or 
recordkeeping requirements covered under the Paperwork Reduction Act.

Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)

    This regulatory action does not have Federalism implications, as 
set forth in Executive Order 13132. It will not have substantial direct 
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government.

List of Subjects in 49 CFR Parts 18 and 29

    Administrative practice and procedure, Grant programs, Allowable 
costs, Cooperative agreements.

    Issued on: April 14, 2008.
Mary E. Peters,
Secretary of Transportation.
    In consideration of the foregoing, the DOT proposes to amend, title 
49, Code of Federal Regulations, parts 18 and 19, as set forth below:

PART 18--UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR GRANTS AND 
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS TO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

    1. The authority citation for part 18 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322(a).

    2. In Sec.  18.22(b), revise the table to read as follows:


Sec.  18.22  Allowable costs.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
           For the costs of a                Use the principles in--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State, local or federal-recognized       2 CFR part 225.
 Indian tribal government.
Private non-profit organization other    2 CFR part 230.
 than an (1) institution of higher
 education, (2) hospital, or (3)
 organization named in 2 CFR part 230,
 Appendix C, as not subject to that
 part.
Institutions of higher education.......  2 CFR part 220.
For-profit organizations other than a    48 CFR part 31, Contract Cost
 hospital, commercial organization or a   Principles and Procedures, or
 non-profit organization listed in 2      uniform cost accounting
 CFR part 230, Appendix C, as not         standards that comply with
 subject to that part.                    cost principles acceptable to
                                          the Federal agency.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

PART 19--UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR GRANTS AND 
AGREEMENTS WITH INSTITUTIONS OF HIGER EDUCATION, HOSPITALS, AND 
OTHER NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS

    3. The authority citation for part 19 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322(a).

    4. Revise Sec.  19.27 to read as follows:


Sec.  19.27  Allowable costs.

    (a) Limitation on use of funds. Grant funds may be used only for:

    (1) The allowable costs of the grantees, subgrantees and cost-
type contractors, including allowable costs in the form of payments 
to fixed-price contractors; and
    (2) Reasonable fees or profit to cost-type contractors but not 
any fee or profit (or other increment above allowable costs) to the 
grantee or subgrantee.

    (b) Applicable cost principles. For each kind of recipient, there 
is a set of Federal principles for determining allowable costs. 
Allowability of costs shall be determined according to the cost 
principles applicable to the entity organization incurring the costs. 
The following chart lists the kinds of organization and the applicable 
cost principles:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
           For the costs of a                Use the principles in--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State, local or federal-recognized       2 CFR part 225.
 Indian tribal government.

[[Page 24190]]

 
Private non-profit organization other    2 CFR part 230.
 than an (1) institution of higher
 education, (2) hospital, or (3)
 organization named in 2 CFR part 230,
 Appendix C, as not subject to that
 circular.
Institutions of higher education.......  2 CFR part 220.
Hospitals..............................  45 CFR part 74, Appendix E,
                                          ``Principles for Determining
                                          Costs Applicable to Research
                                          and Development under Grants
                                          and Contracts with
                                          Hospitals.''
For-profit organizations other than a    48 CFR part 31, Contract Cost
 hospital, commercial organization or a   Principles and Procedures, or
 non-profit organization listed in 2      uniform cost accounting
 CFR part 230, Appendix C, as not         standards that comply with
 subject to that part.                    cost principles acceptable to
                                          the Federal agency.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. E8-8789 Filed 5-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.