Sentencing Guidelines for United States Courts, 23521-23522 [E8-9372]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 84 / Wednesday, April 30, 2008 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–9469 Filed 4–29–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
UNITED STATES SENTENCING
COMMISSION
Sentencing Guidelines for United
States Courts
United States Sentencing
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of final action regarding
amendments to a policy statement and
commentary effective May 1, 2008.
AGENCY:
The Sentencing Commission
hereby gives notice of amendments to
the commentary to § 2D1.1 (Unlawful
Manufacturing, Importing, Exporting, or
Trafficking (Including Possession with
Intent to Commit These Offenses);
Attempt or Conspiracy) and to policy
statement § 1B1.10 (Reduction in Term
of Imprisonment as a Result of
Amended Guideline Range (Policy
Statement)) made pursuant to its
authority under 28 U.S.C. 994(a), (o),
and (u).
DATES: The Commission has specified
an effective date of May 1, 2008 for the
amendments set forth in this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Courlander, Public Affairs
Officer, Telephone: (202) 502–4590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
United States Sentencing Commission is
an independent agency in the judicial
branch of the United States
Government. The Commission
promulgates sentencing guidelines and
policy statements for federal sentencing
courts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(a). The
Commission also periodically reviews
and revises previously promulgated
guidelines pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(o),
and specifies in what circumstances and
by what amount sentences of
imprisonment may be reduced if the
Commission reduces the term of
imprisonment recommended in the
guidelines applicable to a particular
offense or category of offenses pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. 994(u).
Unlike amendments made to
sentencing guidelines, the Commission
is not required to apply the procedures
of section 553 of title 5, United States
Code, to amendments to policy
statements and commentary. See 28
U.S.C. 994(x). To the extent practicable,
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
15 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:09 Apr 29, 2008
Jkt 214001
the Commission endeavors to apply
such procedures to amendments to
policy statements and commentary.
Because the Commission has identified
a certain sentencing anomaly in which
some offenders have not received the
reduction intended by Amendment 706
and some offenders have received a
greater reduction than intended by
Amendment 706, see USSC, Guidelines
Manual, Supplement to Appendix C,
Amendment 706 (November 1, 2007),
the Commission did not apply the
provisions of section 553 of title 5,
United States Code, to the promulgation
of the amendments set forth in this
notice.
Additional information may be
accessed through the Commission’s Web
site at www.ussc.gov.
Authority: 28 U.S.C. 994(a), (o), and (u);
USSC Rules of Practice and Procedure 4.1.
Ricardo H. Hinojosa,
Chair.
1. Amendment: The Commentary to
§ 2D1.1 captioned ‘‘Application Notes’’
is amended in Note 10 by striking
subdivision (D) in its entirety and
inserting the following:
‘‘(D) Determining Base Offense Level
in Offenses Involving Cocaine Base and
Other Controlled Substances.—
(i) In General.—Except as provided in
subdivision (ii), if the offense involves
cocaine base (‘crack’) and one or more
other controlled substance, determine
the combined offense level as provided
by subdivision (B) of this note, and
reduce the combined offense level by 2
levels.
(ii) Exceptions to 2-level Reduction.—
The 2-level reduction provided in
subdivision (i) shall not apply in a case
in which:
(I) the offense involved 4.5 kg or
more, or less than 250 mg, of cocaine
base; or
(II) the 2-level reduction results in a
combined offense level that is less than
the combined offense level that would
apply under subdivision (B) of this note
if the offense involved only the other
controlled substance(s) (i.e., the
controlled substance(s) other than
cocaine base).
(iii) Examples.—
(I) The case involves 20 gm of cocaine
base, 1.5 kg of cocaine, and 10 kg of
marihuana. Under the Drug Equivalency
Tables in subdivision (E) of this note, 20
gm of cocaine base converts to 400 kg
of marihuana (20 gm × 20 kg = 400 kg),
and 1.5 kg of cocaine converts to 300 kg
of marihuana (1.5 kg × 200 gm = 300 kg),
which, when added to the 10 kg of
marihuana results in a combined
equivalent quantity of 710 kg of
marihuana. Under the Drug Quantity
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23521
Table, 710 kg of marihuana corresponds
to a combined offense level of 30, which
is reduced by two levels to level 28. For
the cocaine and marihuana, their
combined equivalent quantity of 310 kg
of marihuana corresponds to a
combined offense level of 26 under the
Drug Quantity Table. Because the
combined offense level for all three drug
types after the 2-level reduction is not
less than the combined base offense
level for the cocaine and marihuana, the
combined offense level for all three drug
types remains level 28.
(II) The case involves 5 gm of cocaine
base and 6 kg of heroin. Under the Drug
Equivalency Tables in subdivision (E) of
this note, 5 gm of cocaine base converts
to 100 kg of marihuana (5 gm × 20 kg
= 100 kg), and 6 kg of heroin converts
to 6,000 kg of marihuana (6,000 gm × 1
kg = 6,000 kg), which, when added
together results in a combined
equivalent quantity of 6,100 kg of
marihuana. Under the Drug Quantity
Table, 6,100 kg of marihuana
corresponds to a combined offense level
of 34, which is reduced by two levels to
32. For the heroin, the 6,000 kg of
marihuana corresponds to an offense
level 34 under the Drug Quantity Table.
Because the combined offense level for
the two drug types after the 2-level
reduction is less than the offense level
for the heroin, the reduction does not
apply and the combined offense level
for the two drugs remains level 34.’’.
The Commentary to § 2D1.1 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 10, in subdivision (E), by inserting
under the heading ‘‘Cocaine and Other
Schedule I and II Stimulants (and their
immediate precursors)*’’ the following
as the fifteenth entry:
‘‘1 gm Cocaine Base (‘Crack’) = 20 kg
of marihuana’’.
Reason for Amendment: This
amendment modifies the commentary to
§ 2D1.1 (Unlawful Manufacturing,
Importing, Exporting, or Trafficking
(Including Possession with Intent to
Commit These Offenses); Attempt or
Conspiracy) to revise the manner in
which combined offense levels are
determined in cases involving cocaine
base (‘‘crack cocaine’’) and one or more
other controlled substance. Specifically,
Application Note 10(D) has resulted in
a certain sentencing anomaly in which
some offenders have not received the
benefit of the two-level reduction
provided by Amendment 706 because of
the conversion of cocaine base to its
marihuana equivalent, and some
offenders have received a reduction
greater than intended. (See USSC,
Guidelines Manual, Supplement to the
E:\FR\FM\30APN1.SGM
30APN1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
23522
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 84 / Wednesday, April 30, 2008 / Notices
2007 Supplement to Appendix C,
Amendment 706).
In order to remedy this anomaly, this
amendment modifies the Drug
Equivalency Tables to provide that 1
gram of cocaine base equals 20
kilograms of marihuana, as it did prior
to Amendment 706, and amends
Application Note 10(D) to provide that
the combined offense level for an
offense involving cocaine base and one
or more other controlled substance is
determined initially in the same manner
as for other polydrug cases under
Application Note 10(B). In order to
effectuate the two-level reduction
intended by Amendment 706, this
amendment further provides that the
resulting combined offense level is
reduced by two levels. However, the
amendment provides three exclusions to
application of the two-level reduction.
First, the two-level reduction does not
apply if the offense involved 4.5
kilograms or more of cocaine base
because the offense levels for such
offenses were unaffected by
Amendment 706. Second, the two-level
reduction does not apply if the offense
involved less than 250 milligrams of
cocaine base in order to ensure that the
offense level does not reduce below
level 12, the minimum offense level in
the Drug Quantity Table for offenses
involving cocaine base. Third, the twolevel reduction does not apply if it
would result in a combined offense
level that is less than the combined
offense level that would apply if the
offense involved only the other
controlled substance(s) (i.e., the
controlled substance(s) other than
cocaine base). This third exclusion
ensures that offenses involving
controlled substances other than
cocaine base do not receive a lower
offense level than they otherwise would
receive merely because cocaine base
also is involved in the offense.
2. Amendment: Section 1B1.10 is
amended in subsection (c) by striking
‘‘and’’; and by inserting ‘‘, and 715’’
before the period.
Reason for Amendment: This
amendment expands the listing in
§ 1B1.10(c) (Reduction in Term of
Imprisonment as a Result of Amended
Guideline Range (Policy Statement)) to
include Amendment 715 as an
amendment that may be applied
retroactively pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
994(u). The Commission determined for
the same reasons accompanying
Amendment 713 that Amendment 715
also should be applied retroactively.
(See USSC, Guidelines Manual,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:09 Apr 29, 2008
Jkt 214001
Supplement to the 2007 Supplement to
Appendix C, Amendment 713).
[FR Doc. E8–9372 Filed 4–29–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2211–01–P
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
[Docket No. SSA 2008–0026]
Privacy Act of 1974, as Amended;
Computer Matching Program (SSA/
Department of Labor (DOL) Match
Number 1003))
AGENCY:
Social Security Administration
(SSA).
Notice of the renewal of an
existing computer matching program
which is scheduled to expire on May 15,
2008.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
provisions of the Privacy Act, as
amended, this notice announces the
renewal of an existing computer
matching program that SSA is currently
conducting with DOL.
DATES: SSA will file a report of the
subject matching program with the
Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs of the Senate; the
Committee on Oversight and
Government Reform of the House of
Representatives; and the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). The renewal of the matching
program will be effective as indicated
below.
Interested parties may
comment on this notice by either telefax
to (410) 965–0201 or writing to the
Deputy Commissioner for Budget,
Finance and Management, 800 Altmeyer
Building, 6401 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, MD 21235–6401. All
comments received will be available for
public inspection at this address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Deputy Commissioner for Budget,
Finance and Management as shown
above.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. General
The Computer Matching and Privacy
Protection Act of 1988 Public Law (Pub.
L.) 100–503, amended the Privacy Act (5
U.S.C. 552a) by describing the
conditions under which computer
matching involving the Federal
government could be performed and
adding certain protections for
individuals applying for and receiving
Federal benefits. Section 7201 of the
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of
1990 (Pub. L. 101–508) further amended
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the Privacy Act regarding protections for
such individuals.
The Privacy Act, as amended,
regulates the use of computer matching
by Federal agencies when records in a
system of records are matched with
other Federal, State or local government
records. It requires Federal agencies
involved in computer matching
programs to:
(1) Negotiate written agreements with
the other agency or agencies
participating in the matching programs;
(2) Obtain the approval of the
matching agreement by the Data
Integrity Boards (DIB) of the
participating Federal agencies;
(3) Publish notice of the computer
matching program in the Federal
Register;
(4) Furnish detailed reports about
matching programs to Congress and
OMB;
(5) Notify applicants and beneficiaries
that their records are subject to
matching; and
(6) Verify match findings before
reducing, suspending, terminating or
denying an individual’s benefits or
payments.
B. SSA Computer Matches Subject to
the Privacy Act
We have taken action to ensure that
all of SSA’s computer matching
programs comply with the requirements
of the Privacy Act, as amended.
Dated: April 22, 2008.
Mary Glenn-Croft,
Deputy Commissioner for Budget, Finance
and Management.
Notice of Computer Matching Program,
SSA With DOL
A. Participating Agencies
SSA and DOL.
B. Purpose of the Matching Program
This computer matching agreement
sets forth the responsibilities of SSA
and DOL with respect to information
disclosed pursuant to this agreement
and is executed under the Privacy Act
of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, as amended by
the Computer Matching and Privacy
Protection Act of 1988, as amended, and
the regulations promulgated thereunder.
It establishes the conditions under
which the DOL agrees to the disclosure
of Part C Black Lung (BL) benefit data
(DOL administered) to SSA. SSA will
match DOL’s Part C BL data with SSA’s
records of persons receiving Social
Security disability benefits in order to
verify that recipients of Part C BL
benefits are receiving the correct
amount of Social Security disability
benefits.
E:\FR\FM\30APN1.SGM
30APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 84 (Wednesday, April 30, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23521-23522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-9372]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION
Sentencing Guidelines for United States Courts
AGENCY: United States Sentencing Commission.
ACTION: Notice of final action regarding amendments to a policy
statement and commentary effective May 1, 2008.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Sentencing Commission hereby gives notice of amendments to
the commentary to Sec. 2D1.1 (Unlawful Manufacturing, Importing,
Exporting, or Trafficking (Including Possession with Intent to Commit
These Offenses); Attempt or Conspiracy) and to policy statement Sec.
1B1.10 (Reduction in Term of Imprisonment as a Result of Amended
Guideline Range (Policy Statement)) made pursuant to its authority
under 28 U.S.C. 994(a), (o), and (u).
DATES: The Commission has specified an effective date of May 1, 2008
for the amendments set forth in this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Courlander, Public Affairs
Officer, Telephone: (202) 502-4590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Sentencing Commission is
an independent agency in the judicial branch of the United States
Government. The Commission promulgates sentencing guidelines and policy
statements for federal sentencing courts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(a).
The Commission also periodically reviews and revises previously
promulgated guidelines pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(o), and specifies in
what circumstances and by what amount sentences of imprisonment may be
reduced if the Commission reduces the term of imprisonment recommended
in the guidelines applicable to a particular offense or category of
offenses pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(u).
Unlike amendments made to sentencing guidelines, the Commission is
not required to apply the procedures of section 553 of title 5, United
States Code, to amendments to policy statements and commentary. See 28
U.S.C. 994(x). To the extent practicable, the Commission endeavors to
apply such procedures to amendments to policy statements and
commentary. Because the Commission has identified a certain sentencing
anomaly in which some offenders have not received the reduction
intended by Amendment 706 and some offenders have received a greater
reduction than intended by Amendment 706, see USSC, Guidelines Manual,
Supplement to Appendix C, Amendment 706 (November 1, 2007), the
Commission did not apply the provisions of section 553 of title 5,
United States Code, to the promulgation of the amendments set forth in
this notice.
Additional information may be accessed through the Commission's Web
site at www.ussc.gov.
Authority: 28 U.S.C. 994(a), (o), and (u); USSC Rules of
Practice and Procedure 4.1.
Ricardo H. Hinojosa,
Chair.
1. Amendment: The Commentary to Sec. 2D1.1 captioned ``Application
Notes'' is amended in Note 10 by striking subdivision (D) in its
entirety and inserting the following:
``(D) Determining Base Offense Level in Offenses Involving Cocaine
Base and Other Controlled Substances.--
(i) In General.--Except as provided in subdivision (ii), if the
offense involves cocaine base (`crack') and one or more other
controlled substance, determine the combined offense level as provided
by subdivision (B) of this note, and reduce the combined offense level
by 2 levels.
(ii) Exceptions to 2-level Reduction.--The 2-level reduction
provided in subdivision (i) shall not apply in a case in which:
(I) the offense involved 4.5 kg or more, or less than 250 mg, of
cocaine base; or
(II) the 2-level reduction results in a combined offense level that
is less than the combined offense level that would apply under
subdivision (B) of this note if the offense involved only the other
controlled substance(s) (i.e., the controlled substance(s) other than
cocaine base).
(iii) Examples.--
(I) The case involves 20 gm of cocaine base, 1.5 kg of cocaine, and
10 kg of marihuana. Under the Drug Equivalency Tables in subdivision
(E) of this note, 20 gm of cocaine base converts to 400 kg of marihuana
(20 gm x 20 kg = 400 kg), and 1.5 kg of cocaine converts to 300 kg of
marihuana (1.5 kg x 200 gm = 300 kg), which, when added to the 10 kg of
marihuana results in a combined equivalent quantity of 710 kg of
marihuana. Under the Drug Quantity Table, 710 kg of marihuana
corresponds to a combined offense level of 30, which is reduced by two
levels to level 28. For the cocaine and marihuana, their combined
equivalent quantity of 310 kg of marihuana corresponds to a combined
offense level of 26 under the Drug Quantity Table. Because the combined
offense level for all three drug types after the 2-level reduction is
not less than the combined base offense level for the cocaine and
marihuana, the combined offense level for all three drug types remains
level 28.
(II) The case involves 5 gm of cocaine base and 6 kg of heroin.
Under the Drug Equivalency Tables in subdivision (E) of this note, 5 gm
of cocaine base converts to 100 kg of marihuana (5 gm x 20 kg = 100
kg), and 6 kg of heroin converts to 6,000 kg of marihuana (6,000 gm x 1
kg = 6,000 kg), which, when added together results in a combined
equivalent quantity of 6,100 kg of marihuana. Under the Drug Quantity
Table, 6,100 kg of marihuana corresponds to a combined offense level of
34, which is reduced by two levels to 32. For the heroin, the 6,000 kg
of marihuana corresponds to an offense level 34 under the Drug Quantity
Table. Because the combined offense level for the two drug types after
the 2-level reduction is less than the offense level for the heroin,
the reduction does not apply and the combined offense level for the two
drugs remains level 34.''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2D1.1 captioned ``Application Notes'' is
amended in Note 10, in subdivision (E), by inserting under the heading
``Cocaine and Other Schedule I and II Stimulants (and their immediate
precursors)*'' the following as the fifteenth entry:
``1 gm Cocaine Base (`Crack') = 20 kg of marihuana''.
Reason for Amendment: This amendment modifies the commentary to
Sec. 2D1.1 (Unlawful Manufacturing, Importing, Exporting, or
Trafficking (Including Possession with Intent to Commit These
Offenses); Attempt or Conspiracy) to revise the manner in which
combined offense levels are determined in cases involving cocaine base
(``crack cocaine'') and one or more other controlled substance.
Specifically, Application Note 10(D) has resulted in a certain
sentencing anomaly in which some offenders have not received the
benefit of the two-level reduction provided by Amendment 706 because of
the conversion of cocaine base to its marihuana equivalent, and some
offenders have received a reduction greater than intended. (See USSC,
Guidelines Manual, Supplement to the
[[Page 23522]]
2007 Supplement to Appendix C, Amendment 706).
In order to remedy this anomaly, this amendment modifies the Drug
Equivalency Tables to provide that 1 gram of cocaine base equals 20
kilograms of marihuana, as it did prior to Amendment 706, and amends
Application Note 10(D) to provide that the combined offense level for
an offense involving cocaine base and one or more other controlled
substance is determined initially in the same manner as for other
polydrug cases under Application Note 10(B). In order to effectuate the
two-level reduction intended by Amendment 706, this amendment further
provides that the resulting combined offense level is reduced by two
levels. However, the amendment provides three exclusions to application
of the two-level reduction. First, the two-level reduction does not
apply if the offense involved 4.5 kilograms or more of cocaine base
because the offense levels for such offenses were unaffected by
Amendment 706. Second, the two-level reduction does not apply if the
offense involved less than 250 milligrams of cocaine base in order to
ensure that the offense level does not reduce below level 12, the
minimum offense level in the Drug Quantity Table for offenses involving
cocaine base. Third, the two-level reduction does not apply if it would
result in a combined offense level that is less than the combined
offense level that would apply if the offense involved only the other
controlled substance(s) (i.e., the controlled substance(s) other than
cocaine base). This third exclusion ensures that offenses involving
controlled substances other than cocaine base do not receive a lower
offense level than they otherwise would receive merely because cocaine
base also is involved in the offense.
2. Amendment: Section 1B1.10 is amended in subsection (c) by
striking ``and''; and by inserting ``, and 715'' before the period.
Reason for Amendment: This amendment expands the listing in Sec.
1B1.10(c) (Reduction in Term of Imprisonment as a Result of Amended
Guideline Range (Policy Statement)) to include Amendment 715 as an
amendment that may be applied retroactively pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
994(u). The Commission determined for the same reasons accompanying
Amendment 713 that Amendment 715 also should be applied retroactively.
(See USSC, Guidelines Manual, Supplement to the 2007 Supplement to
Appendix C, Amendment 713).
[FR Doc. E8-9372 Filed 4-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2211-01-P