National Park System Units in Alaska, 22890-22894 [E8-9184]
Download as PDF
22890
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 82 / Monday, April 28, 2008 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 916
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: April 2, 2008.
Bill Joseph,
Acting Regional Director, Mid-Continent
Region.
[FR Doc. E8–9194 Filed 4–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 13
RIN 1024–AD69
National Park System Units in Alaska
National Park Service, Interior.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The NPS is proposing to
implement recent management
decisions affecting Denali National Park
and Preserve regarding backcountry
management, climbing Mount
McKinley, and off-road vehicle use for
subsistence purposes.
DATES: Comments must be received by
June 27, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your
comments, identified by Regulatory
Information Number 1024–AD69 (RIN),
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: National Park Service,
Regional Director, Alaska Regional
Office, 240 West 5th Ave., Anchorage,
AK 99501.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
National Park Service, Victor Knox,
Deputy Regional Director, Alaska
Regional Office, 240 West 5th Ave.,
Anchorage, AK 99501. Telephone: (907)
644–3501. E-mail:
akro_regulations@nps.gov. Fax: (907)
644–3816.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Background
In 1917 Congress established Mount
McKinley National Park as a game
refuge. By 1932, the park had been
enlarged to approximately 2 million
acres. In 1980 the Alaska National
Interest Lands Conservation Act tripled
the size of the park and renamed it
Denali National Park and Preserve. At 6
million acres, Denali exemplifies
interior Alaska’s character as one of the
world’s last great frontiers for
wilderness adventure. One third of the
park is designated wilderness-the area
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:31 Apr 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
that roughly conforms to the boundaries
of the former Mount McKinley National
Park. The former Mount McKinley is
closed to hunting and trapping and is
managed to maintain the undeveloped
wilderness parkland character. The
1980 park additions allow customary
and traditional subsistence uses by local
rural residents. The preserve is open to
subsistence uses and also to hunting
and trapping under Alaska state law.
The proposed regulations would
revise Denali National Park and
Preserve regulations in Subpart L of 36
CFR Part 13. The proposed rule
implements the 2006 Final
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
and Record of Decision (ROD) regarding
the Denali Backcountry Management
Plan (BMP) as well as the 2007
Environmental Assessment (EA) and
Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) for subsistence use of off-road
vehicles in the Cantwell Traditional Use
Area. Specific proposed changes
include (1) establishing group size
limits in the backcountry, an annual
limit of 1500 climbers on Mount
McKinley, and camping permits where
they are currently required through the
compendium in accordance with the
2006 BMP/EIS; and (2) restricting offroad vehicle use for subsistence
purposes to designated routes and trails
in Windy Creek, Cantwell Creek, and
Bull River drainages in the Cantwell
Traditional Use Area in accordance with
the 2007 EA/FONSI. Each proposal is
identified in the Section-by-Section
Analysis that follows. As used within
this document, the terms ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘our,’’
and ‘‘us’’ refer to the National Park
Service.
Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 13.902 Subsistence Resident
Zone
ANILCA and NPS implementing
regulations authorize subsistence
hunting and fishing by local rural
residents in parks and monuments
established in 1980 and the portions of
Denali National Park expanded in 1980.
In Denali National Park, local rural
residents are those who reside in a
resident zone community identified in
section 13.902, those who possess a
permit issued by the superintendent
under section 13.440 of this Part, and
those who reside within the park
boundary. A resident zone community
consists of a significant concentration of
local rural residents who customarily
and traditionally engaged in subsistence
uses in the park or monument. Section
808 of ANILCA establishes a
Subsistence Resource Commission
(SRC) to make recommendations to the
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Secretary of the Interior regarding
subsistence hunting matters for each
national park or monument in Alaska
where subsistence is authorized. In
1984, the NPS, in consultation with the
Denali SRC, determined the area within
a three mile radius of the Cantwell Post
Office includes a significant
concentration of local rural residents
who customarily and traditionally
engage in subsistence uses in the park
additions. The three mile radius
provision has been part of the Denali
Subsistence Management Plan since
August 2000 and the park compendium
since 2001.
Section 13.903 Subsistence Off-Road
Vehicle Use
The 1980 Alaska National Interest
Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA)
authorizes subsistence uses by local
rural residents where traditional in the
ANILCA additions of Denali National
Park (Denali park additions). Section
811(b) of ANILCA authorizes the
‘‘appropriate use [of] * * * surface
transportation traditionally employed’’
for subsistence uses by federally
qualified local rural residents, subject to
reasonable regulation.
Relying on information available at
the time, the 1986 Denali General
Management Plan (GMP) did not
consider ORVs to have been regularly
used for subsistence purposes and
therefore did not consider them a
traditional means of subsistence access.
In the 1990s, several Cantwell residents
provided information new to the NPS
regarding historic off-road vehicle use
for subsistence purposes in the Cantwell
area of the Denali park additions and
requested a revision to the GMP to allow
traditional subsistence ORV use. The
information included affidavits from
Cantwell residents describing their use
of ORVs for subsistence purposes,
including types of ORVs, periods of use,
location of use, purpose of use, and
identified individuals who used ORVs.
Upon reviewing the information, in
2005 the NPS determined that ORVs
were used by successive generations of
Cantwell residents for subsistence in the
Cantwell area (Cantwell Traditional Use
Area or TUA) of the Denali National
Park additions (see 2005 Determination
for Traditional ORV Use for Subsistence
in the Cantwell Area) and therefore are
authorized for subsistence purposes in
this area under ANILCA section 811 and
36 CFR 13.460.
In 2005 the park initiated a planning
process and accompanying EA to assure
that subsistence ORV use in the
Cantwell Traditional Use Area is
managed to minimize adverse impacts
to the resources and values for which
E:\FR\FM\28APP1.SGM
28APP1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 82 / Monday, April 28, 2008 / Proposed Rules
the park was established while
continuing to provide reasonable access
for subsistence purposes. Each year
since the 2005 Determination, the NPS
has implemented seasonal closures to
subsistence ORV use in the Traditional
Use Area—excluding the trails
identified in this proposal—during the
fall subsistence hunting season to
protect park resources while the EA was
being prepared and until permanent
regulations are put into place.
The Cantwell Subsistence Off-Road
Vehicle Management EA was completed
in 2007 and a FONSI was signed shortly
thereafter. The NPS decided that only
designated trails and areas in the
Traditional Use Area would remain
open to use of ORVs by federally
qualified subsistence users from
Cantwell and those residents of Game
Management Unit 13E holding a permit
issued pursuant to 36 CFR 13.440 for
subsistence purposes. The designated
trails and areas are: Windy Creek Access
Trail, Windy Creek Bowl Trail, Cantwell
Airstrip Trail, Pyramid Peak Trail, and
the Cantwell Creek Floodplain Corridor.
Future designation of a trail and area
along the Bull River Floodplain Corridor
is contingent upon access being secured
across adjacent state lands, construction
of an NPS approved trail, and a
determination by the superintendent
that ORV use continues to be necessary
for reasonable access to the Bull River
for subsistence resources. ORV use
within the Bull River Floodplain
Corridor and Cantwell Creek Floodplain
Corridor would be limited to designated
trails and unvegetated gravel bars.
Motor vehicle use off of designated
trails or areas would be prohibited.
This provision would also establish
the types of ORVs that may be operated
on designated trails or areas, who is
authorized to use ORVs, and methods to
notify the public of closures or
restrictions should changing
environmental conditions warrant.
Nothing in this provision would
supersede the provisions of 36 CFR
13.460(d), which requires that ORVs be
operated in compliance with applicable
state and federal laws, and prohibits
damaging park resources or harassing
wildlife.
Should credible information become
available in the future regarding
subsistence ORV use in other areas of
the park additions or preserve, the park
will at that time consider whether such
ORV use is traditional under ANILCA
section 811.
The 2005 Cantwell Subsistence
Traditionally Employed ORV
Determination as well as the 200 EA and
FONSI are available at park
headquarters, https://www.regs.gov, and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:54 Apr 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
https://www.nps.gov/dena/parkmgmt/
managementdocs.htm.
Section 13.904 Camping
This provision would replace the
existing camping regulation that allows
camping in accordance with the BMP,
moving a camping permit requirement
in the high visitation areas of the park
from the compendium to regulation.
This proposal would clarify that
camping permits are required in the
former Mount McKinley National Park
and the Kantishna area. Based on
visitation patterns, the NPS does not
believe camping permits are necessary
in other areas of the park or preserve at
this time and therefore are not required.
Section 13.905 Group Size
This provision would implement the
2006 BMP/EIS decisions on group size.
The BMP/EIS calls for a maximum
backcountry group size of 12 for the
eastern half of the park and a maximum
of 6 in the western half of the park and
preserve. The western half of the park
has a lower group size limit. The
western portion of the park and preserve
are managed to provide opportunities
for extended expeditions that are remote
with little evidence of humans and few
encounters with other visitors. The
eastern half of the park receives more
visitation, has more evidence of
humans, and visitors should expect a
greater likelihood of contacting others.
This proposal would also provide the
superintendent with discretion to
authorize larger groups on a case by case
basis.
Section 13.910 Mountain Climbing
This provision would implement
sections of the 2006 BMP/EIS by
requiring a permit to climb Mount
McKinley or Mount Foraker and also
establish a limit on the number of
climbers on Mount McKinley. An
existing 60 day advance registration
requirement under current regulations
was crafted with the intention of
reducing climbing-related accidents and
altitude illnesses on Mount McKinley
and Mount Foraker. Prior to its
promulgation, mountaineering teams
could register the same day they
departed for the mountain, often with
little or no advance preparation or
contact with experienced
mountaineering rangers. With the
advance contact, rangers have an early
opportunity to evaluate an expedition’s
climbing history and make safety
recommendations accordingly. These
recommendations include urging
additional glacier travel, altitude, or
winter camping experiences prior to any
ascent of Mount McKinley or Foraker;
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22891
suggesting climbing with an authorized
guiding service; or encouraging a more
appropriate route based on the reported
level of expertise. The advance notice
also provides a climbing team adequate
time to choose a leader, organize its
members, and pre-plan the expedition
for improved safety.
This proposal would change the
current registration requirement to a
permit requirement and would establish
an annual limit of 1500 climbers on
Mount McKinley as called for in the
BMP/EIS. Due to limited capacity by the
NPS to provide required safety briefings,
conduct ranger patrols, contact climbers
on Mount McKinley, and respond to
search and rescue incidents, the NPS
determined more than 1500 climbers
may compromise visitor and employee
safety, potentially resulting in more
fatalities. Over the past ten years, there
has been an annual average of 1226
climbers attempting Mount McKinley,
with a maximum of 1340 in 2005.
Compliance With Other Laws
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Order 12866)
This document is not a significant
rule and is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866.
(1) This rule will not have an effect of
$100 million or more on the economy.
It will not adversely affect in a material
way the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or state, local, or
tribal governments or communities.
However, it is anticipated that
governmental processes and economic
efficiency in Denali National Park and
Preserve would be improved by this
proposed regulatory action.
(2) This rule will not create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another agency. This is an agencyspecific rule that will not interfere with
other agencies or local government
plans, policies, or controls. The
proposals included with this
rulemaking apply to areas managed by
the National Park Service and do not
conflict with other federal regulations.
The review process used to develop the
rulemaking proposals included
consultation with the State of Alaska.
(3) This rule does not alter the
budgetary effects of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs, or the rights
and obligations of their recipients. This
rule will have no effects on
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights or obligations of
their recipients. No grants or other
E:\FR\FM\28APP1.SGM
28APP1
22892
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 82 / Monday, April 28, 2008 / Proposed Rules
forms of monetary supplements are
involved.
(4) This rule does not raise novel legal
or policy issues. This rule implements
existing legislative enactments, judicial
interpretations, regulatory provisions,
and planning decisions. It is not a
completely new proposal, but rather a
continuation of the rulemaking process
begun in 1980 to implement various
provisions of the Alaska National
Interest Lands Conservation Act
(ANILCA). In implementing ANILCA,
NPS has sought to promulgate only
those regulations necessary to interpret
the law and to provide for the health
and safety of the public and the
environment.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this document will not
have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The economic effects
of this rule are local in nature and
negligible in scope. The proposals in
this rulemaking will either implement
rules unrelated to business activity or,
in the case of the proposed annual
climbing limits for Mount McKinley,
does not extend beyond the usual
contractual limits for small entities
authorized to do business in the park.
Consequently, the proposed rule will
have no effect on small entities.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), SBREFA. This rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
Expenses related to compliance with
various provisions of this proposed rule
are slight. No new user fees or charges
are proposed. Any incidental costs
associated with the proposed climbing
permits would be covered by or instead
of those for the existing registration,
check-in, or orientation programs and
would not be additional.
b. Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, federal, state, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions. Most of the
proposed provisions of this rulemaking
will generally continue existing rules
and use patterns for Denali National
Park and Preserve.
c. Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
The various provisions of this proposed
rule do not apply differently to U.S.-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:54 Apr 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
based enterprises and foreign-based
enterprises.
public to obtain benefits in the form of
camping and climbing permits.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
National Environmental Policy Act
This rulemaking addresses only
actions that will be taken by the NPS.
It will not require any State, local or
tribal government to take any action that
is not funded. In accordance with the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2
U.S.C. 1501 et seq.):
a. This rule will not ‘‘significantly or
uniquely’’ affect small governments. A
Small Government Agency Plan is not
required. This rule is an agency specific
rule and imposes no other requirements
on small governments.
b. This rule will not produce a federal
mandate of $100 million or greater in
any year, i.e., it is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act.
We have analyzed this rule in
accordance with the criteria of the
National Environmental Policy Act and
516 DM. This rule does not constitute a
major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human
environment. A Record of Decision
(ROD) for the Denali National Park and
Preserve Final Backcountry
Management Plan Environmental
Impact Statement was approved on
February 21, 2006. On September 18,
2007, a Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) was approved for the Cantwell
Subsistence ORV Management
Environmental Assessment. These
documents together represent the
environmental analysis for this
proposed rule, and are available for
review at: https://www.nps.gov/dena/
parkmgmt/managementdocs.htm, or
https://www.regulations.gov
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
In accordance with Executive Order
12630, the rule does not have significant
takings implications. A takings
implication assessment is not required
because no taking of property will occur
as a result of this proposed rule.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
In accordance with Executive Order
13132, the rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
The proposed rule is limited in effect to
federal lands and waters managed by
the NPS and will not have a substantial
direct effect on state and local
government in Alaska. This proposed
rule was initiated in part at the request
of the state and has been drafted in close
consultation with the State of Alaska
and, as such, promotes the principles of
federalism.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
In accordance with Executive Order
12988, the Office of the Solicitor has
determined that this rule does not
unduly burden the judicial system and
meets the requirements of §§ 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of the order. This rule does not
impose a new burden on the judicial
system.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This regulation requires information
collection from 10 or more parties,
which must be submitted for OMB
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act. However, these are not
new collection requirements and,
therefore, no additional request to OMB
has been prepared. The information
collection activities are necessary for the
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Government-to-Government
Relationship With Tribes
In accordance with Executive Order
13175 ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249); the President’s memorandum of
April 29, 1994, ‘‘Government-toGovernment Relations with Native
American Tribal Governments’’ (59 FR
22951); the Department of the Interior—
Alaska Policy on Government-toGovernment Relations with Alaska
Native Tribes dated January 18, 2001;
part 512 of the Departmental Manual,
Chapter 2 ‘‘Departmental
Responsibilities for Indian Trust
Resources’’; and park consultation
agreements with tribal governments, the
potential effects on Federallyrecognized Indian tribes have been
evaluated, and it has been determined at
this time that there are no potential
effects that have not been addressed in
prior decision documents.
While the consultation agreements
noted above have not resulted in
findings of new potential effects,
various proposals are of interest to local
residents using Denali National Park
and Preserve and have been facilitated
by the relationships established through
government-to-government
consultation. Finally, the initial
determination of effect noted here is
dynamic and subject to change
throughout this rulemaking process due
to the ongoing nature of government-togovernment consultation for the NPS
areas in Alaska.
E:\FR\FM\28APP1.SGM
28APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 82 / Monday, April 28, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Clarity of This Rule
We are required by Executive Orders
12866 and 12988 and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1,
1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we
publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than
jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you feel that we have not met these
requirements, send us comments by one
of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section. To better help us revise the
rule, your comments should be as
specific as possible. For example, you
should tell us the numbers of the
sections or paragraphs that are unclearly
written, which sections or sentences are
too long, the sections where you feel
lists or tables would be useful, etc.
Drafting Information: The principal
contributors to this proposed rule are:
Peter Armington, Steve Carwile, Philip
Hooge, and Joe Van Horn, Denali
National Park and Preserve; Andee
Sears and Paul Hunter, NPS Alaska
Regional Office; and Jerry Case,
Regulations Program Manager, NPS,
Washington, DC.
Public Participation
You may submit comments online at:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
You may also mail or hand deliver
comments to: National Park Service,
Regional Director, Alaska Regional
Office, 240 West 5th Ave., Anchorage,
AK 99501.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 13
Alaska, National Parks, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, the
National Park Service proposes to
amend 36 CFR part 13 as set forth
below:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:31 Apr 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
PART 13—NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM
UNITS IN ALASKA
1. The authority citation for part 13
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1, 3, 462(k), 3101 et
seq.; Subpart N also issued under 16 U.S.C.
1a–2(h), 20, 1361, 1531, 3197; Pub. L. 105–
277, 112 Stat. 2681–259, October 21, 1998;
Pub. L. 106–31, 113 Stat. 72, May 21, 1999;
Sec. 13.1204 also issued under Sec. 1035,
Pub. L. 104–333, 110 Stat. 4240.
Subpart L—[Amended]
2. Revise § 13.902 to read as follows:
§ 13.902
Subsistence resident zone.
The following communities and areas
are included within the resident zone
for Denali National Park addition:
Cantwell (limited to the area within a 3
mile radius of the Cantwell post office
as shown on a map available at the park
visitor center), Minchumina, Nikolai,
and Telida.
3. Add § 13.903 to subpart L to read
as follows:
§ 13.903 Subsistence use of off-road
vehicles.
Operating a motor vehicle off road is
prohibited except by authorized
residents as defined in this section
when engaged in subsistence uses. For
purposes of this section, ‘‘authorized
residents’’ means residents of the
Cantwell resident zone community as
defined by this subpart or those
residents of Alaska Game Management
Unit 13E holding a permit issued under
§ 13.440 of this part. Operating a motor
vehicle off road for subsistence
purposes outside any area designated by
this section is prohibited. A map and
GPS coordinates of designated trails and
areas are available on the park Web site
and at the park visitor center.
(a) Authorized residents may operate
vehicles off road only in the following
designated areas and trails:
(1) The Windy Creek Trail;
(2) The Cantwell Airstrip Trail;
(3) The Pyramid Trail;
(4) The Cantwell Creek Floodplain
Trail/Corridor; and
(5) A trail or area along the Bull River
Floodplain designated by the
superintendent under paragraph (b) of
this section.
(b) The superintendent may designate
a trail or area along the Bull River
Floodplain Corridor for motor vehicle
use by authorized residents if the
superintendent determines that the
following conditions are met:
(1) Access across adjacent non-NPS
lands has been secured;
(2) An NPS-approved trail has been
constructed on NPS lands; and
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22893
(3) Off-road vehicle use continues to
be necessary for reasonable access to the
Bull River for subsistence resources by
authorized residents.
(c) All of the following are prohibited:
(1) Motor vehicles greater than 5.5 feet
wide;
(2) Motor vehicles exceeding 1,000
pounds curb (unloaded) weight;
(3) Motor vehicles that steer by
locking or skidding a wheel or track;
and
(4) Operating a motor vehicle in
violation of § 13.460(d) of this part.
(d) The superintendent may restrict or
prohibit motor vehicle use authorized
by this section in accordance with
§ 13.460(b) of this part. The
Superintendent will notify the public of
the proposed restriction or closure by:
(1) Publishing a notice in at least one
newspaper of general circulation in the
State and in at least one local
newspaper if appropriate;
(2) Making information about the
proposed or emergency actions available
for broadcast on local radio stations; and
(3) Posting information about the
proposed or emergency actions at local
post offices, on the park Web site, and,
if appropriate, on signs at the designated
trails or areas.
4. Revise § 13.904 to read as follows:
§ 13.904
Camping.
Camping without a permit in
designated areas in the former Mount
McKinley National Park or the
Kantishna area is prohibited. A map
showing areas where a permit is
required for camping is available at the
park visitor center and on the park Web
site. Violating terms and conditions of
the permit is prohibited.
5. Add § 13.905 to subpart L to read
as follows:
§ 13.905
Group size.
(a) The following are prohibited:
(1) Group sizes exceeding 12
individuals on the east side of the park
outside the Frontcountry Developed
Area as defined by this subpart.
(2) Group sizes exceeding 6
individuals on the west side of the park
outside the Frontcountry Developed
Area as defined by this subpart.
(b) A map showing the east and west
boundaries is available at the park
visitor center.
(c) The superintendent may authorize
larger groups on a case-by-case basis.
6. Revise § 13.910 to read as follows:
§ 13.910
Mountain climbing.
(a) Climbing Mount McKinley and
Mount Foraker without a permit is
prohibited. Climbers must apply for a
permit at least 60 days in advance of
E:\FR\FM\28APP1.SGM
28APP1
22894
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 82 / Monday, April 28, 2008 / Proposed Rules
any climb. The superintendent may
authorize a maximum of 1500 climbers
on Mount McKinley each year.
(b) Violating terms and conditions of
the permit is prohibited.
Dated: April 8, 2008.
Lyle Laverty,
Assistant Secretary, Fish and Wildlife and
Parks.
[FR Doc. E8–9184 Filed 4–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–EF–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
37 CFR Part 2
[Docket No. PTO–T–2006–0011]
RIN 0651–AC05
Institution of a Fee To File on Paper a
Request for Reconsideration of a Final
Office Action in a Trademark Case
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of
proposed rule and withdrawal of
proposed rule.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In response to objections
raised, the United States Patent and
Trademark Office (‘‘USPTO’’)
withdraws its prior proposal to amend
the Rules of Practice in Trademark
Cases to require a request for
reconsideration of an examining
attorney’s final refusal or requirement to
be filed through the Trademark
Electronic Application System
(‘‘TEAS’’) within three months of the
mailing date of the final action. The
USPTO instead proposes to require a fee
of $50 for filing a request for
reconsideration on paper, whereas no
fee would be required for a request for
reconsideration filed through TEAS.
The proposed fee would cover the
USPTO’s added costs of processing a
request for reconsideration filed on
paper, rather than through TEAS.
Currently, no fee is required in
connection with a request for
reconsideration, filed either on paper or
through TEAS.
DATES: Comments must be received by
June 27, 2008 to ensure consideration.
ADDRESSES: The Office prefers that
comments be submitted via electronic
mail message to
TMRECONCOMMENTS@USPTO.GOV.
Written comments may also be
submitted by mail to Commissioner for
Trademarks, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria,
VA 22313–1451, attention Cynthia C.
Lynch; or by hand delivery to the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:54 Apr 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
Trademark Assistance Center,
Concourse Level, James Madison
Building-East Wing, 600 Dulany Street,
Alexandria, Virginia, attention Cynthia
C. Lynch; or by electronic mail message
via the Federal eRulemaking Portal. See
the Federal eRulemaking Portal Web site
(https://www.regulations.gov) for
additional instructions on providing
comments via the Federal eRulemaking
Portal.
The comments will be available for
public inspection on the Office’s Web
site at https://www.uspto.gov, and will
also be available at the Office of the
Commissioner for Trademarks, Madison
East, Tenth Floor, 600 Dulany Street,
Alexandria, Virginia.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia C. Lynch, Office of the Deputy
Commissioner for Trademark
Examination Policy, by telephone at
(571) 272–8742.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
USPTO withdraws its prior proposal to
amend the Rules of Practice in
Trademark Cases to shorten the
deadline for filing a request for
reconsideration of a final Office action
and to mandate that such a request be
filed through TEAS. The USPTO
received comments about practical
difficulties presented by the potentially
shorter deadline, and has determined
that, at this time, the benefits that would
be achieved by the shortened deadline
do not outweigh the objections
expressed by some commenters.
Regarding the proposal to mandate
filing through TEAS, the Office remains
convinced that, as set forth in the
previous notice, the filing of requests for
reconsideration electronically, rather
than on paper, promotes efficiency in
processing the requests and, thereby, in
the prosecution of the application.
Paper-filed requests necessitate: (1)
Manual scanning and uploading of the
documents into the USPTO database,
and (2) the creation of paper application
file wrappers in which to store the
original of the paper-filed request for
those applications where all previous
filings were through TEAS. In contrast,
TEAS-filed requests are automatically
uploaded into the USPTO database and
require no manual scanning or creation
of a file wrapper.
Paper-filed requests also introduce
processing delays in addition to those
described above. Many applicants
simultaneously seek reconsideration of
a final refusal and file an appeal to the
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
(‘‘TTAB’’). Because the examining
attorney loses jurisdiction over the
application upon the filing of an appeal
to the TTAB, this simultaneous pursuit
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
of reconsideration and appeal
necessitates a remand by the TTAB to
the examining attorney for a decision on
the request for reconsideration. Where
the applicant has filed the request on
paper, the application is often remanded
to the examining attorney before the
request has been received and/or
uploaded into the USPTO database, and
so is not immediately available for the
examining attorney’s review and
consideration. Thus, filing through
TEAS expedites the examining
attorney’s notice of and access to the
request, shortens pendency, requires
less manual processing, and is more cost
efficient for the USPTO.
While not disputing the efficiencies
achieved by TEAS-filing, some
commenters indicated their desire to
avoid filing through TEAS when the
request for reconsideration would
include voluminous attachments that
the applicant must scan for submission
through TEAS. As an initial matter, the
USPTO notes that by the request for
reconsideration stage, an applicant has
already received at least one non-final
action and, in response thereto, has had
an opportunity to submit available
evidence in support of registration. A
request for reconsideration is not
intended as an opportunity for an
applicant to put forth evidence that
could have been provided in response to
an initial action. As such, a legitimate
need to attach voluminous evidence to
a request for reconsideration should
only arise where significantly different
evidence is included in the final action,
which the applicant wishes to rebut.
In addition, the USPTO notes that
most filers are able to scan even
voluminous evidence, and file it
electronically. Nonetheless, in an effort
to provide customer service to those
who prefer to file requests for
reconsideration on paper and therefore
shift to the USPTO the burden of
scanning and storing the request and all
attachments, the USPTO proposes to
permit such paper-filing upon payment
of a fee in the amount of $50. This fee
for paper filing would cover the
USPTO’s added costs of processing a
request for reconsideration filed on
paper. No fee would be required for
filing a request for reconsideration
through TEAS. A TEAS Plus applicant
who files a request for reconsideration
on paper would also be responsible for
the fee for the loss of TEAS Plus status
pursuant to §§ 2.23(b) and 2.23(a)(1)(i).
References in this notice to ‘‘the Act,’’
‘‘the Trademark Act,’’ or ‘‘the statute’’
refer to the Trademark Act of 1946, 15
U.S.C. 1051 et seq., as amended.
E:\FR\FM\28APP1.SGM
28APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 82 (Monday, April 28, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22890-22894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-9184]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 13
RIN 1024-AD69
National Park System Units in Alaska
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The NPS is proposing to implement recent management decisions
affecting Denali National Park and Preserve regarding backcountry
management, climbing Mount McKinley, and off-road vehicle use for
subsistence purposes.
DATES: Comments must be received by June 27, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your comments, identified by Regulatory
Information Number 1024-AD69 (RIN), by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: National Park Service, Regional Director, Alaska
Regional Office, 240 West 5th Ave., Anchorage, AK 99501.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: National Park Service, Victor Knox,
Deputy Regional Director, Alaska Regional Office, 240 West 5th Ave.,
Anchorage, AK 99501. Telephone: (907) 644-3501. E-mail: akro_
regulations@nps.gov. Fax: (907) 644-3816.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In 1917 Congress established Mount McKinley National Park as a game
refuge. By 1932, the park had been enlarged to approximately 2 million
acres. In 1980 the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act
tripled the size of the park and renamed it Denali National Park and
Preserve. At 6 million acres, Denali exemplifies interior Alaska's
character as one of the world's last great frontiers for wilderness
adventure. One third of the park is designated wilderness-the area that
roughly conforms to the boundaries of the former Mount McKinley
National Park. The former Mount McKinley is closed to hunting and
trapping and is managed to maintain the undeveloped wilderness parkland
character. The 1980 park additions allow customary and traditional
subsistence uses by local rural residents. The preserve is open to
subsistence uses and also to hunting and trapping under Alaska state
law.
The proposed regulations would revise Denali National Park and
Preserve regulations in Subpart L of 36 CFR Part 13. The proposed rule
implements the 2006 Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and
Record of Decision (ROD) regarding the Denali Backcountry Management
Plan (BMP) as well as the 2007 Environmental Assessment (EA) and
Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for subsistence use of off-
road vehicles in the Cantwell Traditional Use Area. Specific proposed
changes include (1) establishing group size limits in the backcountry,
an annual limit of 1500 climbers on Mount McKinley, and camping permits
where they are currently required through the compendium in accordance
with the 2006 BMP/EIS; and (2) restricting off-road vehicle use for
subsistence purposes to designated routes and trails in Windy Creek,
Cantwell Creek, and Bull River drainages in the Cantwell Traditional
Use Area in accordance with the 2007 EA/FONSI. Each proposal is
identified in the Section-by-Section Analysis that follows. As used
within this document, the terms ``we,'' ``our,'' and ``us'' refer to
the National Park Service.
Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 13.902 Subsistence Resident Zone
ANILCA and NPS implementing regulations authorize subsistence
hunting and fishing by local rural residents in parks and monuments
established in 1980 and the portions of Denali National Park expanded
in 1980. In Denali National Park, local rural residents are those who
reside in a resident zone community identified in section 13.902, those
who possess a permit issued by the superintendent under section 13.440
of this Part, and those who reside within the park boundary. A resident
zone community consists of a significant concentration of local rural
residents who customarily and traditionally engaged in subsistence uses
in the park or monument. Section 808 of ANILCA establishes a
Subsistence Resource Commission (SRC) to make recommendations to the
Secretary of the Interior regarding subsistence hunting matters for
each national park or monument in Alaska where subsistence is
authorized. In 1984, the NPS, in consultation with the Denali SRC,
determined the area within a three mile radius of the Cantwell Post
Office includes a significant concentration of local rural residents
who customarily and traditionally engage in subsistence uses in the
park additions. The three mile radius provision has been part of the
Denali Subsistence Management Plan since August 2000 and the park
compendium since 2001.
Section 13.903 Subsistence Off-Road Vehicle Use
The 1980 Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA)
authorizes subsistence uses by local rural residents where traditional
in the ANILCA additions of Denali National Park (Denali park
additions). Section 811(b) of ANILCA authorizes the ``appropriate use
[of] * * * surface transportation traditionally employed'' for
subsistence uses by federally qualified local rural residents, subject
to reasonable regulation.
Relying on information available at the time, the 1986 Denali
General Management Plan (GMP) did not consider ORVs to have been
regularly used for subsistence purposes and therefore did not consider
them a traditional means of subsistence access. In the 1990s, several
Cantwell residents provided information new to the NPS regarding
historic off-road vehicle use for subsistence purposes in the Cantwell
area of the Denali park additions and requested a revision to the GMP
to allow traditional subsistence ORV use. The information included
affidavits from Cantwell residents describing their use of ORVs for
subsistence purposes, including types of ORVs, periods of use, location
of use, purpose of use, and identified individuals who used ORVs. Upon
reviewing the information, in 2005 the NPS determined that ORVs were
used by successive generations of Cantwell residents for subsistence in
the Cantwell area (Cantwell Traditional Use Area or TUA) of the Denali
National Park additions (see 2005 Determination for Traditional ORV Use
for Subsistence in the Cantwell Area) and therefore are authorized for
subsistence purposes in this area under ANILCA section 811 and 36 CFR
13.460.
In 2005 the park initiated a planning process and accompanying EA
to assure that subsistence ORV use in the Cantwell Traditional Use Area
is managed to minimize adverse impacts to the resources and values for
which
[[Page 22891]]
the park was established while continuing to provide reasonable access
for subsistence purposes. Each year since the 2005 Determination, the
NPS has implemented seasonal closures to subsistence ORV use in the
Traditional Use Area--excluding the trails identified in this
proposal--during the fall subsistence hunting season to protect park
resources while the EA was being prepared and until permanent
regulations are put into place.
The Cantwell Subsistence Off-Road Vehicle Management EA was
completed in 2007 and a FONSI was signed shortly thereafter. The NPS
decided that only designated trails and areas in the Traditional Use
Area would remain open to use of ORVs by federally qualified
subsistence users from Cantwell and those residents of Game Management
Unit 13E holding a permit issued pursuant to 36 CFR 13.440 for
subsistence purposes. The designated trails and areas are: Windy Creek
Access Trail, Windy Creek Bowl Trail, Cantwell Airstrip Trail, Pyramid
Peak Trail, and the Cantwell Creek Floodplain Corridor. Future
designation of a trail and area along the Bull River Floodplain
Corridor is contingent upon access being secured across adjacent state
lands, construction of an NPS approved trail, and a determination by
the superintendent that ORV use continues to be necessary for
reasonable access to the Bull River for subsistence resources. ORV use
within the Bull River Floodplain Corridor and Cantwell Creek Floodplain
Corridor would be limited to designated trails and unvegetated gravel
bars. Motor vehicle use off of designated trails or areas would be
prohibited.
This provision would also establish the types of ORVs that may be
operated on designated trails or areas, who is authorized to use ORVs,
and methods to notify the public of closures or restrictions should
changing environmental conditions warrant. Nothing in this provision
would supersede the provisions of 36 CFR 13.460(d), which requires that
ORVs be operated in compliance with applicable state and federal laws,
and prohibits damaging park resources or harassing wildlife.
Should credible information become available in the future
regarding subsistence ORV use in other areas of the park additions or
preserve, the park will at that time consider whether such ORV use is
traditional under ANILCA section 811.
The 2005 Cantwell Subsistence Traditionally Employed ORV
Determination as well as the 200 EA and FONSI are available at park
headquarters, https://www.regs.gov, and https://www.nps.gov/dena/
parkmgmt/managementdocs.htm.
Section 13.904 Camping
This provision would replace the existing camping regulation that
allows camping in accordance with the BMP, moving a camping permit
requirement in the high visitation areas of the park from the
compendium to regulation. This proposal would clarify that camping
permits are required in the former Mount McKinley National Park and the
Kantishna area. Based on visitation patterns, the NPS does not believe
camping permits are necessary in other areas of the park or preserve at
this time and therefore are not required.
Section 13.905 Group Size
This provision would implement the 2006 BMP/EIS decisions on group
size. The BMP/EIS calls for a maximum backcountry group size of 12 for
the eastern half of the park and a maximum of 6 in the western half of
the park and preserve. The western half of the park has a lower group
size limit. The western portion of the park and preserve are managed to
provide opportunities for extended expeditions that are remote with
little evidence of humans and few encounters with other visitors. The
eastern half of the park receives more visitation, has more evidence of
humans, and visitors should expect a greater likelihood of contacting
others. This proposal would also provide the superintendent with
discretion to authorize larger groups on a case by case basis.
Section 13.910 Mountain Climbing
This provision would implement sections of the 2006 BMP/EIS by
requiring a permit to climb Mount McKinley or Mount Foraker and also
establish a limit on the number of climbers on Mount McKinley. An
existing 60 day advance registration requirement under current
regulations was crafted with the intention of reducing climbing-related
accidents and altitude illnesses on Mount McKinley and Mount Foraker.
Prior to its promulgation, mountaineering teams could register the same
day they departed for the mountain, often with little or no advance
preparation or contact with experienced mountaineering rangers. With
the advance contact, rangers have an early opportunity to evaluate an
expedition's climbing history and make safety recommendations
accordingly. These recommendations include urging additional glacier
travel, altitude, or winter camping experiences prior to any ascent of
Mount McKinley or Foraker; suggesting climbing with an authorized
guiding service; or encouraging a more appropriate route based on the
reported level of expertise. The advance notice also provides a
climbing team adequate time to choose a leader, organize its members,
and pre-plan the expedition for improved safety.
This proposal would change the current registration requirement to
a permit requirement and would establish an annual limit of 1500
climbers on Mount McKinley as called for in the BMP/EIS. Due to limited
capacity by the NPS to provide required safety briefings, conduct
ranger patrols, contact climbers on Mount McKinley, and respond to
search and rescue incidents, the NPS determined more than 1500 climbers
may compromise visitor and employee safety, potentially resulting in
more fatalities. Over the past ten years, there has been an annual
average of 1226 climbers attempting Mount McKinley, with a maximum of
1340 in 2005.
Compliance With Other Laws
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Order 12866)
This document is not a significant rule and is not subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866.
(1) This rule will not have an effect of $100 million or more on
the economy. It will not adversely affect in a material way the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or state, local, or tribal governments or
communities. However, it is anticipated that governmental processes and
economic efficiency in Denali National Park and Preserve would be
improved by this proposed regulatory action.
(2) This rule will not create a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency. This is an
agency-specific rule that will not interfere with other agencies or
local government plans, policies, or controls. The proposals included
with this rulemaking apply to areas managed by the National Park
Service and do not conflict with other federal regulations. The review
process used to develop the rulemaking proposals included consultation
with the State of Alaska.
(3) This rule does not alter the budgetary effects of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligations of
their recipients. This rule will have no effects on entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights or obligations of
their recipients. No grants or other
[[Page 22892]]
forms of monetary supplements are involved.
(4) This rule does not raise novel legal or policy issues. This
rule implements existing legislative enactments, judicial
interpretations, regulatory provisions, and planning decisions. It is
not a completely new proposal, but rather a continuation of the
rulemaking process begun in 1980 to implement various provisions of the
Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA). In
implementing ANILCA, NPS has sought to promulgate only those
regulations necessary to interpret the law and to provide for the
health and safety of the public and the environment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this document will
not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The economic effects of this rule are local in nature and negligible in
scope. The proposals in this rulemaking will either implement rules
unrelated to business activity or, in the case of the proposed annual
climbing limits for Mount McKinley, does not extend beyond the usual
contractual limits for small entities authorized to do business in the
park. Consequently, the proposed rule will have no effect on small
entities.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), SBREFA. This
rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more. Expenses related to compliance with various provisions of this
proposed rule are slight. No new user fees or charges are proposed. Any
incidental costs associated with the proposed climbing permits would be
covered by or instead of those for the existing registration, check-in,
or orientation programs and would not be additional.
b. Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, federal, state, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions. Most of the proposed provisions of
this rulemaking will generally continue existing rules and use patterns
for Denali National Park and Preserve.
c. Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. The
various provisions of this proposed rule do not apply differently to
U.S.-based enterprises and foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rulemaking addresses only actions that will be taken by the
NPS. It will not require any State, local or tribal government to take
any action that is not funded. In accordance with the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.):
a. This rule will not ``significantly or uniquely'' affect small
governments. A Small Government Agency Plan is not required. This rule
is an agency specific rule and imposes no other requirements on small
governments.
b. This rule will not produce a federal mandate of $100 million or
greater in any year, i.e., it is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
In accordance with Executive Order 12630, the rule does not have
significant takings implications. A takings implication assessment is
not required because no taking of property will occur as a result of
this proposed rule.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
In accordance with Executive Order 13132, the rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment. The proposed rule is limited in effect to
federal lands and waters managed by the NPS and will not have a
substantial direct effect on state and local government in Alaska. This
proposed rule was initiated in part at the request of the state and has
been drafted in close consultation with the State of Alaska and, as
such, promotes the principles of federalism.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)
In accordance with Executive Order 12988, the Office of the
Solicitor has determined that this rule does not unduly burden the
judicial system and meets the requirements of Sec. Sec. 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of the order. This rule does not impose a new burden on the
judicial system.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This regulation requires information collection from 10 or more
parties, which must be submitted for OMB approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act. However, these are not new collection requirements and,
therefore, no additional request to OMB has been prepared. The
information collection activities are necessary for the public to
obtain benefits in the form of camping and climbing permits.
National Environmental Policy Act
We have analyzed this rule in accordance with the criteria of the
National Environmental Policy Act and 516 DM. This rule does not
constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality
of the human environment. A Record of Decision (ROD) for the Denali
National Park and Preserve Final Backcountry Management Plan
Environmental Impact Statement was approved on February 21, 2006. On
September 18, 2007, a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) was
approved for the Cantwell Subsistence ORV Management Environmental
Assessment. These documents together represent the environmental
analysis for this proposed rule, and are available for review at:
https://www.nps.gov/dena/parkmgmt/managementdocs.htm, or https://
www.regulations.gov
Government-to-Government Relationship With Tribes
In accordance with Executive Order 13175 ``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249); the
President's memorandum of April 29, 1994, ``Government-to-Government
Relations with Native American Tribal Governments'' (59 FR 22951); the
Department of the Interior--Alaska Policy on Government-to-Government
Relations with Alaska Native Tribes dated January 18, 2001; part 512 of
the Departmental Manual, Chapter 2 ``Departmental Responsibilities for
Indian Trust Resources''; and park consultation agreements with tribal
governments, the potential effects on Federally-recognized Indian
tribes have been evaluated, and it has been determined at this time
that there are no potential effects that have not been addressed in
prior decision documents.
While the consultation agreements noted above have not resulted in
findings of new potential effects, various proposals are of interest to
local residents using Denali National Park and Preserve and have been
facilitated by the relationships established through government-to-
government consultation. Finally, the initial determination of effect
noted here is dynamic and subject to change throughout this rulemaking
process due to the ongoing nature of government-to-government
consultation for the NPS areas in Alaska.
[[Page 22893]]
Clarity of This Rule
We are required by Executive Orders 12866 and 12988 and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever possible.
If you feel that we have not met these requirements, send us
comments by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. To
better help us revise the rule, your comments should be as specific as
possible. For example, you should tell us the numbers of the sections
or paragraphs that are unclearly written, which sections or sentences
are too long, the sections where you feel lists or tables would be
useful, etc.
Drafting Information: The principal contributors to this proposed
rule are: Peter Armington, Steve Carwile, Philip Hooge, and Joe Van
Horn, Denali National Park and Preserve; Andee Sears and Paul Hunter,
NPS Alaska Regional Office; and Jerry Case, Regulations Program
Manager, NPS, Washington, DC.
Public Participation
You may submit comments online at: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. You may also mail or
hand deliver comments to: National Park Service, Regional Director,
Alaska Regional Office, 240 West 5th Ave., Anchorage, AK 99501.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 13
Alaska, National Parks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, the National Park Service
proposes to amend 36 CFR part 13 as set forth below:
PART 13--NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM UNITS IN ALASKA
1. The authority citation for part 13 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1, 3, 462(k), 3101 et seq.; Subpart N also
issued under 16 U.S.C. 1a-2(h), 20, 1361, 1531, 3197; Pub. L. 105-
277, 112 Stat. 2681-259, October 21, 1998; Pub. L. 106-31, 113 Stat.
72, May 21, 1999; Sec. 13.1204 also issued under Sec. 1035, Pub. L.
104-333, 110 Stat. 4240.
Subpart L--[Amended]
2. Revise Sec. 13.902 to read as follows:
Sec. 13.902 Subsistence resident zone.
The following communities and areas are included within the
resident zone for Denali National Park addition: Cantwell (limited to
the area within a 3 mile radius of the Cantwell post office as shown on
a map available at the park visitor center), Minchumina, Nikolai, and
Telida.
3. Add Sec. 13.903 to subpart L to read as follows:
Sec. 13.903 Subsistence use of off-road vehicles.
Operating a motor vehicle off road is prohibited except by
authorized residents as defined in this section when engaged in
subsistence uses. For purposes of this section, ``authorized
residents'' means residents of the Cantwell resident zone community as
defined by this subpart or those residents of Alaska Game Management
Unit 13E holding a permit issued under Sec. 13.440 of this part.
Operating a motor vehicle off road for subsistence purposes outside any
area designated by this section is prohibited. A map and GPS
coordinates of designated trails and areas are available on the park
Web site and at the park visitor center.
(a) Authorized residents may operate vehicles off road only in the
following designated areas and trails:
(1) The Windy Creek Trail;
(2) The Cantwell Airstrip Trail;
(3) The Pyramid Trail;
(4) The Cantwell Creek Floodplain Trail/Corridor; and
(5) A trail or area along the Bull River Floodplain designated by
the superintendent under paragraph (b) of this section.
(b) The superintendent may designate a trail or area along the Bull
River Floodplain Corridor for motor vehicle use by authorized residents
if the superintendent determines that the following conditions are met:
(1) Access across adjacent non-NPS lands has been secured;
(2) An NPS-approved trail has been constructed on NPS lands; and
(3) Off-road vehicle use continues to be necessary for reasonable
access to the Bull River for subsistence resources by authorized
residents.
(c) All of the following are prohibited:
(1) Motor vehicles greater than 5.5 feet wide;
(2) Motor vehicles exceeding 1,000 pounds curb (unloaded) weight;
(3) Motor vehicles that steer by locking or skidding a wheel or
track; and
(4) Operating a motor vehicle in violation of Sec. 13.460(d) of
this part.
(d) The superintendent may restrict or prohibit motor vehicle use
authorized by this section in accordance with Sec. 13.460(b) of this
part. The Superintendent will notify the public of the proposed
restriction or closure by:
(1) Publishing a notice in at least one newspaper of general
circulation in the State and in at least one local newspaper if
appropriate;
(2) Making information about the proposed or emergency actions
available for broadcast on local radio stations; and
(3) Posting information about the proposed or emergency actions at
local post offices, on the park Web site, and, if appropriate, on signs
at the designated trails or areas.
4. Revise Sec. 13.904 to read as follows:
Sec. 13.904 Camping.
Camping without a permit in designated areas in the former Mount
McKinley National Park or the Kantishna area is prohibited. A map
showing areas where a permit is required for camping is available at
the park visitor center and on the park Web site. Violating terms and
conditions of the permit is prohibited.
5. Add Sec. 13.905 to subpart L to read as follows:
Sec. 13.905 Group size.
(a) The following are prohibited:
(1) Group sizes exceeding 12 individuals on the east side of the
park outside the Frontcountry Developed Area as defined by this
subpart.
(2) Group sizes exceeding 6 individuals on the west side of the
park outside the Frontcountry Developed Area as defined by this
subpart.
(b) A map showing the east and west boundaries is available at the
park visitor center.
(c) The superintendent may authorize larger groups on a case-by-
case basis.
6. Revise Sec. 13.910 to read as follows:
Sec. 13.910 Mountain climbing.
(a) Climbing Mount McKinley and Mount Foraker without a permit is
prohibited. Climbers must apply for a permit at least 60 days in
advance of
[[Page 22894]]
any climb. The superintendent may authorize a maximum of 1500 climbers
on Mount McKinley each year.
(b) Violating terms and conditions of the permit is prohibited.
Dated: April 8, 2008.
Lyle Laverty,
Assistant Secretary, Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. E8-9184 Filed 4-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-EF-P