Limited Work Authorizations for Nuclear Power Plants; Correction, 22786-22787 [E8-8890]
Download as PDF
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with RULES
22786
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 82 / Monday, April 28, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
was intended to reimburse custom
harvesters for the cost of that cleaning
and disinfection.
The May 2004 interim rule also
provided for the payment of
compensation equivalent to the value of
one contract that an eligible custom
harvester lost due to the downtime
necessitated by cleaning and
disinfection. If an eligible custom
harvester did not lose a contract due to
this downtime, the interim rule
provided for the payment of
compensation for the fixed costs he or
she incurred during the time the
machine was being cleaned and
disinfected. The May 2004 interim rule
also provided for the payment of
compensation for the expenses
associated with the cleaning and
disinfection of other types of equipment
used in the four affected counties.
The other comments we received did
not address the situations addressed by
the interim rule. Instead, they addressed
the regulations in place before the
publication of the interim rule,
requesting that APHIS provide
additional compensation to parties
affected by the Karnal bunt quarantine
regulations. Specifically, commenters
stated that:
• APHIS should pay compensation
for wheat grown in quarantined areas;
• Compensation for wheat should be
based on the market in which the wheat
farmer being compensated is
accustomed to selling wheat;
• Compensation should be provided
for acreage within the quarantined areas
that would normally be planted with
wheat but is left fallow;
• APHIS should provide
compensation for more than 50 percent
of the cost of decontaminating grain
storage facilities and raise the $20,000
overall limit on such compensation; and
• APHIS should provide greater
compensation for seed, since seed prices
are 2 to 4 times higher than local grain
prices.
These comments are outside the scope
of the interim rule. The provisions of
the regulations addressed by these
commenters were added to the
regulations in a final rule published in
the Federal Register on August 6, 2001
(66 FR 40839–40843, Docket No. 96–
016–37) that established the
compensation levels for the 1999–2000
crop season and subsequent years and
made several other changes to the
compensation regulations. For the
reasons discussed in that final rule, we
have determined that the present
compensation provisions are
appropriate.
One commenter stated that APHIS
should provide compensation to seed
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:07 Apr 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
companies and handlers that store
uncertified wheat seed that tests sporepositive for Karnal bunt.
The regulations in § 301.89–15
provide for compensation for handlers
and seed companies who sell wheat
grown in an area under the first
regulated crop season only if the wheat
was not tested by APHIS prior to
purchase by the handler or seed
company and found positive for Karnal
bunt after purchase by the handler or
seed company, as long as the price to be
paid is not contingent on the test
results. Compensation for such wheat
will equal the estimated market price for
the relevant class of wheat (meaning the
type of wheat, such as durum or hard
red winter), minus the actual price
received by the handler or seed
company. Further details are specified
in paragraph (a)(2) of § 301.89–15. These
provisions were in place during the
2000–2001 crop season, and thus it was
not necessary to amend the regulations
in the interim rule to accommodate this
situation.
Therefore, for the reasons given in the
interim rule and in this document, we
are adopting the interim rule as a final
rule without change.
This action also affirms the
information contained in the interim
rule concerning Executive Order 12866
and the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
Executive Orders 12372 and 12988, and
the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Further, this action has been
determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866 and,
therefore, has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 301
Agricultural commodities, Plant
diseases and pests, Quarantine,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Transportation.
PART 301—DOMESTIC QUARANTINE
NOTICES
Accordingly, we are adopting as a
final rule, without change, the interim
rule that amended 7 CFR part 301 and
that was published at 67 FR 21561–
21566 on May 1, 2002.
I
Done in Washington, DC, this 17th day of
April 2008.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E8–9236 Filed 4–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Parts 2, 50, 51, 52, and 100
[NRC–2008–0222]
RIN 3150–AI05
Limited Work Authorizations for
Nuclear Power Plants; Correction
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document corrects a
final rule appearing in the Federal
Register on October 9, 2007 (72 FR
57415), that amended the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission’s (NRC)
regulations applicable to limited work
authorizations (LWAs). This document
is necessary to correct erroneous
language to the preamble and codified
language of the final rule.
DATES: The correction is effective April
28, 2008, and is applicable to November
8, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael T. Lesar, Chief, Rulemaking,
Directives, and Editing Branch, Division
of Administrative Services, Office of
Administrative, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, telephone 301–415–7163, e-mail
Michael.Lesar@nrc.gov.
This
document corrects erroneous language
to the preamble and codified language
of the final rule published on October 9,
2007 (72 FR 57415). Also, as published,
the final regulations contain errors
which may prove to be misleading and
need to be clarified. The following
corrects the preamble to the October 9,
2007, document.
1. On page 57427, third column, in
the first paragraph, the last line is
corrected to read as follows:
To ensure that the NRC has sufficient
information to perform the cumulative
impacts analysis in a timely fashion, the
final LWA rule includes a requirement,
in § 51.45(c), for the environmental
report submitted by an applicant for an
ESP, LWA, construction permit, or
combined license to include a
description of impacts of the applicant’s
preconstruction activities at the
proposed site (i.e., the activities listed in
a paragraph (2)(i) through (2)(x) in the
definition of construction contained in
§ 51.4), that are necessary to support the
construction and operation of the
facility which is the subject of the ESP,
LWA, construction permit, or combined
license application, and an analysis of
the cumulative impacts of the activities
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\28APR1.SGM
28APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 82 / Monday, April 28, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
to be authorized by the ESP, LWA,
construction permit, or combined
license in light of the preconstruction
impacts.
2. On page 57433, third column, the
last paragraph is revised to read as
follows:
Section 51.4 is revised by adding a
new definition of ‘‘construction,’’ which
is identical to the definition of
construction in the revised § 50.10. This
makes applicable throughout part 51 the
definition of construction in § 50.10.
3. On page 57434, in the first column,
the first paragraph is removed.
4. On page 57434, in the first column,
the paragraph under § 51.45 is corrected
to read as follows:
Paragraph (c) is revised by adding a
new requirement requiring
environmental reports for ESPs, LWAs,
construction permits, and combined
licenses to include a description of
impacts of the applicant’s
preconstruction activities at the
proposed site (i.e., the activities listed in
paragraphs (2)(i) through (2)(x) in the
definition of ‘‘construction’’ contained
in § 51.4), that are necessary to support
the construction and operation of the
facility which is the subject of the ESP,
LWA, construction permit, or combined
license application, and an analysis of
the cumulative impacts of the activities
to be authorized by the ESP, LWA,
construction permit, or combined
license in light of the preconstruction
impacts.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 51
Administrative practice and
procedure, Environmental impact
statement, Nuclear materials, Nuclear
power plants and reactors, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble and under the authority of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended;
the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974,
as amended; and 5 U.S.C. 552 and 553,
the NRC is adopting the following
amendment to 10 CFR part 51.
I
PART 51—ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION REGULATIONS FOR
DOMESTIC LICENSING AND RELATED
REGULATORY FUNCTIONS
1. The authority citation for part 51
continues to read as follows:
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with RULES
I
16:07 Apr 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
2. In § 51.45, paragraph (c), the second
complete sentence is corrected to read
as follows:
I
§ 51.45
Environmental report.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * * An environmental report
prepared at the early site permit stage
under § 51.50(b), limited work
authorization stage under § 51.49,
construction permit stage under
§ 51.50(a), or combined license stage
under § 51.50(c) must include a
description of impacts of the
preconstruction activities performed by
the applicant at the proposed site (i.e.,
those activities listed in paragraphs
(2)(i) through (2)(x) in the definition of
‘‘construction’’ contained in § 51.4),
necessary to support the construction
and operation of the facility which is
the subject of the early site permit,
limited work authorization,
construction permit, or combined
license application. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 18th day
of April 2008.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Annette L. Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E8–8890 Filed 4–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–25983; Directorate
Identifier 2006–SW–11–AD; Amendment 39–
15463; AD 2008–08–11]
RIN 2120–AA64
Authority: Sec. 161, 68 Stat. 948, as
amended, sec. 1701, 106 Stat. 2951, 2952,
2953, (42 U.S.C. 2201, 2297f); secs. 201, as
amended, 202, 88 Stat. 1242, as amended,
1244 (42 U.S.C. 5841, 5842); sec. 1704, 112
Stat. 2750 (44 U.S.C. 3504 note). Subpart A
also issued under National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969, secs. 102, 104, 105, 83
Stat. 853–854, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4332,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
4334, 4335); and Pub. L. 95–604, Title II, 92
Stat. 3033–3041; and sec. 193, Pub. L. 101–
575, 104 Stat. 2835 (42 U.S.C. 2243). Sections
51.20, 51.30, 51.60, 51.80. and 51.97 also
issued under secs. 135, 141, Pub. L. 97–425,
96 Stat. 2232, 2241, and sec. 148, Pub. L.
100–203, 101 Stat. 1330–223 (42 U.S.C.
10155, 10161, 10168). Section 51.22 also
issued under sec. 274, 73 Stat. 688, as
amended by 92 Stat. 3036–3038 (42 U.S.C.
2021) and under Nuclear Waste Policy Act of
1982, sec. 121, 96 Stat. 2228 (42 U.S.C.
10141). Sections 51.43, 51.67, and 51.109
also issued under Nuclear Waste Policy Act
of 1982, sec. 114(f), 96 Stat. 2216, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 10134(f)).
Airworthiness Directives; MD
Helicopters, Inc. Model MD900 Series
Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22787
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
MD Helicopters, Inc. (MDHI) Model
MD900 series helicopters that requires
modifying the pilot and co-pilot dualcontrol directional pedal assemblies, or
the pilot single-control directional pedal
assembly (directional control pedal
assembly). This amendment is
prompted by an accident which has
been attributed to loss of directional
control due to failure of the welds in the
directional control pedal assembly. The
actions specified by this AD are
intended to prevent fatigue cracking in
the welds that connect the directional
control pedal to the pedal shaft,
resulting in loss of directional control
and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
Effective June 2, 2008.
The incorporation by reference of
certain publications listed in the
regulations is approved by the Director
of the Federal Register as of June 2,
2008.
DATES:
You may get the service
information identified in this AD from
MD Helicopters, Inc., Attn: Customer
Support Division, 4555 E. McDowell
Rd., Mail Stop M615, Mesa, Arizona
85215–9734, telephone 1–800–388–
3378, fax 480–346–6813, or on the Web
at https://www.mdhelicopters.com.
Examining the Docket: You may
examine the docket that contains this
AD, any comments, and other
information on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or at the Docket
Operations office, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roger Durbin, Aviation Safety Engineer,
FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office, Airframe Branch, 3960
Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, California
90712, telephone (562) 627–5233, fax
(562) 627–5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A
proposal to amend 14 CFR part 39 to
include an AD for the specified model
helicopters was published in the
Federal Register on October 17, 2006
(71 FR 60927). That action proposed to
require, for MDHI Model MD900 series
helicopters, serial numbers (S/N) 900–
00008 through 900–00111, 900–00113,
and 900–00114, modifying the
directional control pedal assembly, part
number (P/N) 900C1012007–107, –109,
–111, –113, or 900C6012007–111 (pilot
dual control); or P/N 900C1012207–105,
–107, –109, –111, or –113 (co-pilot dual
control); or P/N 900C1010007–107,
–109, –111, –113, or 900C6010007–111
E:\FR\FM\28APR1.SGM
28APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 82 (Monday, April 28, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22786-22787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-8890]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
10 CFR Parts 2, 50, 51, 52, and 100
[NRC-2008-0222]
RIN 3150-AI05
Limited Work Authorizations for Nuclear Power Plants; Correction
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document corrects a final rule appearing in the Federal
Register on October 9, 2007 (72 FR 57415), that amended the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission's (NRC) regulations applicable to limited work
authorizations (LWAs). This document is necessary to correct erroneous
language to the preamble and codified language of the final rule.
DATES: The correction is effective April 28, 2008, and is applicable to
November 8, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael T. Lesar, Chief, Rulemaking,
Directives, and Editing Branch, Division of Administrative Services,
Office of Administrative, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone 301-415-7163, e-mail
Michael.Lesar@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document corrects erroneous language to
the preamble and codified language of the final rule published on
October 9, 2007 (72 FR 57415). Also, as published, the final
regulations contain errors which may prove to be misleading and need to
be clarified. The following corrects the preamble to the October 9,
2007, document.
1. On page 57427, third column, in the first paragraph, the last
line is corrected to read as follows:
To ensure that the NRC has sufficient information to perform the
cumulative impacts analysis in a timely fashion, the final LWA rule
includes a requirement, in Sec. 51.45(c), for the environmental report
submitted by an applicant for an ESP, LWA, construction permit, or
combined license to include a description of impacts of the applicant's
preconstruction activities at the proposed site (i.e., the activities
listed in a paragraph (2)(i) through (2)(x) in the definition of
construction contained in Sec. 51.4), that are necessary to support
the construction and operation of the facility which is the subject of
the ESP, LWA, construction permit, or combined license application, and
an analysis of the cumulative impacts of the activities
[[Page 22787]]
to be authorized by the ESP, LWA, construction permit, or combined
license in light of the preconstruction impacts.
2. On page 57433, third column, the last paragraph is revised to
read as follows:
Section 51.4 is revised by adding a new definition of
``construction,'' which is identical to the definition of construction
in the revised Sec. 50.10. This makes applicable throughout part 51
the definition of construction in Sec. 50.10.
3. On page 57434, in the first column, the first paragraph is
removed.
4. On page 57434, in the first column, the paragraph under Sec.
51.45 is corrected to read as follows:
Paragraph (c) is revised by adding a new requirement requiring
environmental reports for ESPs, LWAs, construction permits, and
combined licenses to include a description of impacts of the
applicant's preconstruction activities at the proposed site (i.e., the
activities listed in paragraphs (2)(i) through (2)(x) in the definition
of ``construction'' contained in Sec. 51.4), that are necessary to
support the construction and operation of the facility which is the
subject of the ESP, LWA, construction permit, or combined license
application, and an analysis of the cumulative impacts of the
activities to be authorized by the ESP, LWA, construction permit, or
combined license in light of the preconstruction impacts.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 51
Administrative practice and procedure, Environmental impact
statement, Nuclear materials, Nuclear power plants and reactors,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble and under the authority of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; the Energy Reorganization Act of
1974, as amended; and 5 U.S.C. 552 and 553, the NRC is adopting the
following amendment to 10 CFR part 51.
PART 51--ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION REGULATIONS FOR DOMESTIC
LICENSING AND RELATED REGULATORY FUNCTIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 51 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sec. 161, 68 Stat. 948, as amended, sec. 1701, 106
Stat. 2951, 2952, 2953, (42 U.S.C. 2201, 2297f); secs. 201, as
amended, 202, 88 Stat. 1242, as amended, 1244 (42 U.S.C. 5841,
5842); sec. 1704, 112 Stat. 2750 (44 U.S.C. 3504 note). Subpart A
also issued under National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, secs.
102, 104, 105, 83 Stat. 853-854, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4332, 4334,
4335); and Pub. L. 95-604, Title II, 92 Stat. 3033-3041; and sec.
193, Pub. L. 101-575, 104 Stat. 2835 (42 U.S.C. 2243). Sections
51.20, 51.30, 51.60, 51.80. and 51.97 also issued under secs. 135,
141, Pub. L. 97-425, 96 Stat. 2232, 2241, and sec. 148, Pub. L. 100-
203, 101 Stat. 1330-223 (42 U.S.C. 10155, 10161, 10168). Section
51.22 also issued under sec. 274, 73 Stat. 688, as amended by 92
Stat. 3036-3038 (42 U.S.C. 2021) and under Nuclear Waste Policy Act
of 1982, sec. 121, 96 Stat. 2228 (42 U.S.C. 10141). Sections 51.43,
51.67, and 51.109 also issued under Nuclear Waste Policy Act of
1982, sec. 114(f), 96 Stat. 2216, as amended (42 U.S.C. 10134(f)).
0
2. In Sec. 51.45, paragraph (c), the second complete sentence is
corrected to read as follows:
Sec. 51.45 Environmental report.
* * * * *
(c) * * * An environmental report prepared at the early site permit
stage under Sec. 51.50(b), limited work authorization stage under
Sec. 51.49, construction permit stage under Sec. 51.50(a), or
combined license stage under Sec. 51.50(c) must include a description
of impacts of the preconstruction activities performed by the applicant
at the proposed site (i.e., those activities listed in paragraphs
(2)(i) through (2)(x) in the definition of ``construction'' contained
in Sec. 51.4), necessary to support the construction and operation of
the facility which is the subject of the early site permit, limited
work authorization, construction permit, or combined license
application. * * *
* * * * *
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 18th day of April 2008.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Annette L. Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E8-8890 Filed 4-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P