Limited Work Authorizations for Nuclear Power Plants; Correction, 22786-22787 [E8-8890]

Download as PDF hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with RULES 22786 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 82 / Monday, April 28, 2008 / Rules and Regulations was intended to reimburse custom harvesters for the cost of that cleaning and disinfection. The May 2004 interim rule also provided for the payment of compensation equivalent to the value of one contract that an eligible custom harvester lost due to the downtime necessitated by cleaning and disinfection. If an eligible custom harvester did not lose a contract due to this downtime, the interim rule provided for the payment of compensation for the fixed costs he or she incurred during the time the machine was being cleaned and disinfected. The May 2004 interim rule also provided for the payment of compensation for the expenses associated with the cleaning and disinfection of other types of equipment used in the four affected counties. The other comments we received did not address the situations addressed by the interim rule. Instead, they addressed the regulations in place before the publication of the interim rule, requesting that APHIS provide additional compensation to parties affected by the Karnal bunt quarantine regulations. Specifically, commenters stated that: • APHIS should pay compensation for wheat grown in quarantined areas; • Compensation for wheat should be based on the market in which the wheat farmer being compensated is accustomed to selling wheat; • Compensation should be provided for acreage within the quarantined areas that would normally be planted with wheat but is left fallow; • APHIS should provide compensation for more than 50 percent of the cost of decontaminating grain storage facilities and raise the $20,000 overall limit on such compensation; and • APHIS should provide greater compensation for seed, since seed prices are 2 to 4 times higher than local grain prices. These comments are outside the scope of the interim rule. The provisions of the regulations addressed by these commenters were added to the regulations in a final rule published in the Federal Register on August 6, 2001 (66 FR 40839–40843, Docket No. 96– 016–37) that established the compensation levels for the 1999–2000 crop season and subsequent years and made several other changes to the compensation regulations. For the reasons discussed in that final rule, we have determined that the present compensation provisions are appropriate. One commenter stated that APHIS should provide compensation to seed VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:07 Apr 25, 2008 Jkt 214001 companies and handlers that store uncertified wheat seed that tests sporepositive for Karnal bunt. The regulations in § 301.89–15 provide for compensation for handlers and seed companies who sell wheat grown in an area under the first regulated crop season only if the wheat was not tested by APHIS prior to purchase by the handler or seed company and found positive for Karnal bunt after purchase by the handler or seed company, as long as the price to be paid is not contingent on the test results. Compensation for such wheat will equal the estimated market price for the relevant class of wheat (meaning the type of wheat, such as durum or hard red winter), minus the actual price received by the handler or seed company. Further details are specified in paragraph (a)(2) of § 301.89–15. These provisions were in place during the 2000–2001 crop season, and thus it was not necessary to amend the regulations in the interim rule to accommodate this situation. Therefore, for the reasons given in the interim rule and in this document, we are adopting the interim rule as a final rule without change. This action also affirms the information contained in the interim rule concerning Executive Order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act, Executive Orders 12372 and 12988, and the Paperwork Reduction Act. Further, this action has been determined to be not significant for the purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 301 Agricultural commodities, Plant diseases and pests, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Transportation. PART 301—DOMESTIC QUARANTINE NOTICES Accordingly, we are adopting as a final rule, without change, the interim rule that amended 7 CFR part 301 and that was published at 67 FR 21561– 21566 on May 1, 2002. I Done in Washington, DC, this 17th day of April 2008. Kevin Shea, Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. [FR Doc. E8–9236 Filed 4–25–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–34–P PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Parts 2, 50, 51, 52, and 100 [NRC–2008–0222] RIN 3150–AI05 Limited Work Authorizations for Nuclear Power Plants; Correction Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Final rule; correction. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This document corrects a final rule appearing in the Federal Register on October 9, 2007 (72 FR 57415), that amended the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC) regulations applicable to limited work authorizations (LWAs). This document is necessary to correct erroneous language to the preamble and codified language of the final rule. DATES: The correction is effective April 28, 2008, and is applicable to November 8, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael T. Lesar, Chief, Rulemaking, Directives, and Editing Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Office of Administrative, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555– 0001, telephone 301–415–7163, e-mail Michael.Lesar@nrc.gov. This document corrects erroneous language to the preamble and codified language of the final rule published on October 9, 2007 (72 FR 57415). Also, as published, the final regulations contain errors which may prove to be misleading and need to be clarified. The following corrects the preamble to the October 9, 2007, document. 1. On page 57427, third column, in the first paragraph, the last line is corrected to read as follows: To ensure that the NRC has sufficient information to perform the cumulative impacts analysis in a timely fashion, the final LWA rule includes a requirement, in § 51.45(c), for the environmental report submitted by an applicant for an ESP, LWA, construction permit, or combined license to include a description of impacts of the applicant’s preconstruction activities at the proposed site (i.e., the activities listed in a paragraph (2)(i) through (2)(x) in the definition of construction contained in § 51.4), that are necessary to support the construction and operation of the facility which is the subject of the ESP, LWA, construction permit, or combined license application, and an analysis of the cumulative impacts of the activities SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\28APR1.SGM 28APR1 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 82 / Monday, April 28, 2008 / Rules and Regulations to be authorized by the ESP, LWA, construction permit, or combined license in light of the preconstruction impacts. 2. On page 57433, third column, the last paragraph is revised to read as follows: Section 51.4 is revised by adding a new definition of ‘‘construction,’’ which is identical to the definition of construction in the revised § 50.10. This makes applicable throughout part 51 the definition of construction in § 50.10. 3. On page 57434, in the first column, the first paragraph is removed. 4. On page 57434, in the first column, the paragraph under § 51.45 is corrected to read as follows: Paragraph (c) is revised by adding a new requirement requiring environmental reports for ESPs, LWAs, construction permits, and combined licenses to include a description of impacts of the applicant’s preconstruction activities at the proposed site (i.e., the activities listed in paragraphs (2)(i) through (2)(x) in the definition of ‘‘construction’’ contained in § 51.4), that are necessary to support the construction and operation of the facility which is the subject of the ESP, LWA, construction permit, or combined license application, and an analysis of the cumulative impacts of the activities to be authorized by the ESP, LWA, construction permit, or combined license in light of the preconstruction impacts. List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 51 Administrative practice and procedure, Environmental impact statement, Nuclear materials, Nuclear power plants and reactors, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. For the reasons set out in the preamble and under the authority of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended; and 5 U.S.C. 552 and 553, the NRC is adopting the following amendment to 10 CFR part 51. I PART 51—ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION REGULATIONS FOR DOMESTIC LICENSING AND RELATED REGULATORY FUNCTIONS 1. The authority citation for part 51 continues to read as follows: hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with RULES I 16:07 Apr 25, 2008 Jkt 214001 2. In § 51.45, paragraph (c), the second complete sentence is corrected to read as follows: I § 51.45 Environmental report. * * * * * (c) * * * An environmental report prepared at the early site permit stage under § 51.50(b), limited work authorization stage under § 51.49, construction permit stage under § 51.50(a), or combined license stage under § 51.50(c) must include a description of impacts of the preconstruction activities performed by the applicant at the proposed site (i.e., those activities listed in paragraphs (2)(i) through (2)(x) in the definition of ‘‘construction’’ contained in § 51.4), necessary to support the construction and operation of the facility which is the subject of the early site permit, limited work authorization, construction permit, or combined license application. * * * * * * * * Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 18th day of April 2008. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary of the Commission. [FR Doc. E8–8890 Filed 4–25–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2006–25983; Directorate Identifier 2006–SW–11–AD; Amendment 39– 15463; AD 2008–08–11] RIN 2120–AA64 Authority: Sec. 161, 68 Stat. 948, as amended, sec. 1701, 106 Stat. 2951, 2952, 2953, (42 U.S.C. 2201, 2297f); secs. 201, as amended, 202, 88 Stat. 1242, as amended, 1244 (42 U.S.C. 5841, 5842); sec. 1704, 112 Stat. 2750 (44 U.S.C. 3504 note). Subpart A also issued under National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, secs. 102, 104, 105, 83 Stat. 853–854, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4332, VerDate Aug<31>2005 4334, 4335); and Pub. L. 95–604, Title II, 92 Stat. 3033–3041; and sec. 193, Pub. L. 101– 575, 104 Stat. 2835 (42 U.S.C. 2243). Sections 51.20, 51.30, 51.60, 51.80. and 51.97 also issued under secs. 135, 141, Pub. L. 97–425, 96 Stat. 2232, 2241, and sec. 148, Pub. L. 100–203, 101 Stat. 1330–223 (42 U.S.C. 10155, 10161, 10168). Section 51.22 also issued under sec. 274, 73 Stat. 688, as amended by 92 Stat. 3036–3038 (42 U.S.C. 2021) and under Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, sec. 121, 96 Stat. 2228 (42 U.S.C. 10141). Sections 51.43, 51.67, and 51.109 also issued under Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, sec. 114(f), 96 Stat. 2216, as amended (42 U.S.C. 10134(f)). Airworthiness Directives; MD Helicopters, Inc. Model MD900 Series Helicopters Federal Aviation Administration, DOT. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 22787 SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) for MD Helicopters, Inc. (MDHI) Model MD900 series helicopters that requires modifying the pilot and co-pilot dualcontrol directional pedal assemblies, or the pilot single-control directional pedal assembly (directional control pedal assembly). This amendment is prompted by an accident which has been attributed to loss of directional control due to failure of the welds in the directional control pedal assembly. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent fatigue cracking in the welds that connect the directional control pedal to the pedal shaft, resulting in loss of directional control and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Effective June 2, 2008. The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of June 2, 2008. DATES: You may get the service information identified in this AD from MD Helicopters, Inc., Attn: Customer Support Division, 4555 E. McDowell Rd., Mail Stop M615, Mesa, Arizona 85215–9734, telephone 1–800–388– 3378, fax 480–346–6813, or on the Web at https://www.mdhelicopters.com. Examining the Docket: You may examine the docket that contains this AD, any comments, and other information on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov or at the Docket Operations office, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC. ADDRESSES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roger Durbin, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, Airframe Branch, 3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, California 90712, telephone (562) 627–5233, fax (562) 627–5210. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an AD for the specified model helicopters was published in the Federal Register on October 17, 2006 (71 FR 60927). That action proposed to require, for MDHI Model MD900 series helicopters, serial numbers (S/N) 900– 00008 through 900–00111, 900–00113, and 900–00114, modifying the directional control pedal assembly, part number (P/N) 900C1012007–107, –109, –111, –113, or 900C6012007–111 (pilot dual control); or P/N 900C1012207–105, –107, –109, –111, or –113 (co-pilot dual control); or P/N 900C1010007–107, –109, –111, –113, or 900C6010007–111 E:\FR\FM\28APR1.SGM 28APR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 82 (Monday, April 28, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22786-22787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-8890]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

10 CFR Parts 2, 50, 51, 52, and 100

[NRC-2008-0222]
RIN 3150-AI05


Limited Work Authorizations for Nuclear Power Plants; Correction

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a final rule appearing in the Federal 
Register on October 9, 2007 (72 FR 57415), that amended the Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission's (NRC) regulations applicable to limited work 
authorizations (LWAs). This document is necessary to correct erroneous 
language to the preamble and codified language of the final rule.

DATES: The correction is effective April 28, 2008, and is applicable to 
November 8, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael T. Lesar, Chief, Rulemaking, 
Directives, and Editing Branch, Division of Administrative Services, 
Office of Administrative, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone 301-415-7163, e-mail 
Michael.Lesar@nrc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document corrects erroneous language to 
the preamble and codified language of the final rule published on 
October 9, 2007 (72 FR 57415). Also, as published, the final 
regulations contain errors which may prove to be misleading and need to 
be clarified. The following corrects the preamble to the October 9, 
2007, document.
    1. On page 57427, third column, in the first paragraph, the last 
line is corrected to read as follows:
    To ensure that the NRC has sufficient information to perform the 
cumulative impacts analysis in a timely fashion, the final LWA rule 
includes a requirement, in Sec.  51.45(c), for the environmental report 
submitted by an applicant for an ESP, LWA, construction permit, or 
combined license to include a description of impacts of the applicant's 
preconstruction activities at the proposed site (i.e., the activities 
listed in a paragraph (2)(i) through (2)(x) in the definition of 
construction contained in Sec.  51.4), that are necessary to support 
the construction and operation of the facility which is the subject of 
the ESP, LWA, construction permit, or combined license application, and 
an analysis of the cumulative impacts of the activities

[[Page 22787]]

to be authorized by the ESP, LWA, construction permit, or combined 
license in light of the preconstruction impacts.
    2. On page 57433, third column, the last paragraph is revised to 
read as follows:
    Section 51.4 is revised by adding a new definition of 
``construction,'' which is identical to the definition of construction 
in the revised Sec.  50.10. This makes applicable throughout part 51 
the definition of construction in Sec.  50.10.
    3. On page 57434, in the first column, the first paragraph is 
removed.
    4. On page 57434, in the first column, the paragraph under Sec.  
51.45 is corrected to read as follows:
    Paragraph (c) is revised by adding a new requirement requiring 
environmental reports for ESPs, LWAs, construction permits, and 
combined licenses to include a description of impacts of the 
applicant's preconstruction activities at the proposed site (i.e., the 
activities listed in paragraphs (2)(i) through (2)(x) in the definition 
of ``construction'' contained in Sec.  51.4), that are necessary to 
support the construction and operation of the facility which is the 
subject of the ESP, LWA, construction permit, or combined license 
application, and an analysis of the cumulative impacts of the 
activities to be authorized by the ESP, LWA, construction permit, or 
combined license in light of the preconstruction impacts.

List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 51

    Administrative practice and procedure, Environmental impact 
statement, Nuclear materials, Nuclear power plants and reactors, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.


0
For the reasons set out in the preamble and under the authority of the 
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; the Energy Reorganization Act of 
1974, as amended; and 5 U.S.C. 552 and 553, the NRC is adopting the 
following amendment to 10 CFR part 51.

PART 51--ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION REGULATIONS FOR DOMESTIC 
LICENSING AND RELATED REGULATORY FUNCTIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 51 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Sec. 161, 68 Stat. 948, as amended, sec. 1701, 106 
Stat. 2951, 2952, 2953, (42 U.S.C. 2201, 2297f); secs. 201, as 
amended, 202, 88 Stat. 1242, as amended, 1244 (42 U.S.C. 5841, 
5842); sec. 1704, 112 Stat. 2750 (44 U.S.C. 3504 note). Subpart A 
also issued under National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, secs. 
102, 104, 105, 83 Stat. 853-854, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4332, 4334, 
4335); and Pub. L. 95-604, Title II, 92 Stat. 3033-3041; and sec. 
193, Pub. L. 101-575, 104 Stat. 2835 (42 U.S.C. 2243). Sections 
51.20, 51.30, 51.60, 51.80. and 51.97 also issued under secs. 135, 
141, Pub. L. 97-425, 96 Stat. 2232, 2241, and sec. 148, Pub. L. 100-
203, 101 Stat. 1330-223 (42 U.S.C. 10155, 10161, 10168). Section 
51.22 also issued under sec. 274, 73 Stat. 688, as amended by 92 
Stat. 3036-3038 (42 U.S.C. 2021) and under Nuclear Waste Policy Act 
of 1982, sec. 121, 96 Stat. 2228 (42 U.S.C. 10141). Sections 51.43, 
51.67, and 51.109 also issued under Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 
1982, sec. 114(f), 96 Stat. 2216, as amended (42 U.S.C. 10134(f)).


0
2. In Sec.  51.45, paragraph (c), the second complete sentence is 
corrected to read as follows:


Sec.  51.45  Environmental report.

* * * * *
    (c) * * * An environmental report prepared at the early site permit 
stage under Sec.  51.50(b), limited work authorization stage under 
Sec.  51.49, construction permit stage under Sec.  51.50(a), or 
combined license stage under Sec.  51.50(c) must include a description 
of impacts of the preconstruction activities performed by the applicant 
at the proposed site (i.e., those activities listed in paragraphs 
(2)(i) through (2)(x) in the definition of ``construction'' contained 
in Sec.  51.4), necessary to support the construction and operation of 
the facility which is the subject of the early site permit, limited 
work authorization, construction permit, or combined license 
application. * * *
* * * * *

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 18th day of April 2008.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Annette L. Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E8-8890 Filed 4-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.