Grants to States for Operation of Qualified High Risk Pools, 22281-22287 [E8-9066]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 81 / Friday, April 25, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
K. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule
will be effective June 24, 2008.
Dated: April 17, 2008.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator.
For the reasons set forth above, EPA
is amending the definition of
substantially similar as follows:
I
[FR Doc. E8–8944 Filed 4–24–08; 8:45 am]
Definition—Substantially Similar
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with RULES
EPA will treat a fuel or fuel additive
for general use in light-duty vehicles
manufactured after model year 1974 as
substantially similar to any fuel or fuel
additive utilized in the certification of
any model year 1975, or subsequent
model year vehicle or engine, under
section 206 of the Act, i.e.,
‘‘substantially similar,’’ if the following
criteria are met.
(1) The fuel must contain carbon,
hydrogen, and oxygen, nitrogen, and/or
sulfur, exclusively,2 in the form of some
combination of the following:
(a) Hydrocarbons;
(b) Aliphatic ethers;
(c) Aliphatic alcohols other than
methanol;
(d)(i) Up to 0.3 percent methanol by
volume;
(ii) Up to 2.75 percent methanol by
volume with an equal volume of
butanol, or higher molecular weight
alcohol;
(e) A fuel additive 3 at a concentration
of no more than 0.25 percent by weight
2 Impurities which produce gaseous combustion
products (i.e., products which exist as a gas at
Standard Temperature and Pressure) may be
present in the fuel at trace levels. An impurity is
that substance which is present through
contamination, or remains naturally, after
processing of the fuel is completed.
3 For the purposes of this interpretive rule, the
term ‘‘fuel additive’’ refers only to that part of the
additive package which is not hydrocarbon.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:51 Apr 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
which contributes no more than 15 ppm
sulfur by weight to the fuel.
(2) The fuel must contain no more
than 2.0 percent oxygen by weight,
except fuels containing aliphatic ethers
and/or alcohols (excluding methanol)
must contain no more than 2.7 percent
oxygen by weight.
(3) The fuel must possess, at the time
of manufacture, all of the physical and
chemical characteristics of an unleaded
gasoline as specified in ASTM Standard
D 4814–88 for at least one of the
Seasonal and Geographical Volatility
Classes specified in the standard, with
the exception of fuel introduced into
commerce in the state of Alaska. For
fuel introduced into commerce in the
state of Alaska, all of the requirements
of this section (3) apply, with the
exception of the test temperature for a
maximum Vapor/Liquid Ratio (V/L) of
20, which shall be a minimum of 35 °C
(95 °F) for the period from September 16
through May 31.
(4) The fuel additive must contain
only carbon, hydrogen, and any one or
all of the following elements: Oxygen,
nitrogen, and/or sulfur.4
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
45 CFR Part 148
[CMS–2260–F]
RIN 0938–A046
Grants to States for Operation of
Qualified High Risk Pools
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Final Rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule finalizes the interim
final rule with comment period that was
published on July 27, 2007, regarding
extended funding for seed and
operational grants for State High Risk
Pools under the Public Health Service
Act.
Effective Date: These regulations
are effective May 27, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jessica Kahn, (410) 786–9361, or John
Young, (410) 786–0505.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
4 Impurities which produce gaseous combustion
products may be present in the fuel additive at trace
levels.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22281
I. Background
The Trade Adjustment Assistance
Reform Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107–210)
added section 2745 of the Public Health
Service Act (PHS Act) to provide for two
types of grants to States for the
promotion of ‘‘qualified high risk
pools.’’ These pools provide health
coverage to high-risk individuals who
may find private health insurance
unavailable or unaffordable. Under this
provision, a pool could meet the
definition of a ‘‘qualified’’ high risk pool
for purposes of section 2745 only if it
met the definition of a qualified high
risk pool in section 2744(c)(2) of the
PHS Act. Section 2744 deals with how
States can satisfy the requirement of
section 2741 of the PHS Act to
guarantee access to health coverage for
individuals who meet the definition of
an ‘‘eligible individual’’ under section
2741, as added by the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of
1996 (HIPAA). These individuals are
commonly referred to as ‘‘HIPAAeligible’’ individuals.
Under section 2744(c)(2) of the PHS
Act, a qualified high risk pool must
provide health coverage without a preexisting condition exclusion to ‘‘all’’
HIPAA-eligible individuals. This meant
that State high risk pools that did not
allow all HIPAA-eligible individuals
into the pool without a pre-existing
condition exclusion could not meet the
definition of a ‘‘qualified’’ risk pool.
The two types of grants authorized by
the legislation were ‘‘seed grants’’ for
States that had not yet created a high
risk pool, and ‘‘operational’’ grants to
offset losses incurred by States that
operate a qualified high risk pool. Under
the prior law, in order for a risk pool to
qualify for an operational grant, it could
not charge premiums that exceeded 150
percent of the premium for applicable
standard risk rates. Moreover, the
amount of the grants was limited to 50
percent of the losses incurred by a State.
Section 6202 of the Deficit Reduction
Act of 2005 (Pub. L. 109–171) (DRA)
and the State High Risk Pool Extension
Act of 2006 (Pub. L. 109–172)
(Extension Act) extended funding for
seed and operational grants for State
High Risk Pools and amended section
2745 of the PHS Act. The Extension Act
made the following changes:
1. Expanded the definition of a
‘‘qualified high risk pool.’’ As noted
above, section 2745(d) of the PHS Act
previously defined the term to have the
same meaning as in section 2744(c)(2) of
the PHS Act, which required that the
risk pool provide coverage to ‘‘all’’
HIPAA-eligible individuals (as defined
in § 148.103), without any pre-existing
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
25APR1
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with RULES
22282
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 81 / Friday, April 25, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
condition exclusion. The revised
definition specifies that, for purposes of
grants under section 2745, a risk pool
can be qualified even if the State uses
other mechanisms beyond the risk pool
to ensure that health coverage is
provided to all HIPAA-eligibles.
2. Expanded the definition of ‘‘State.’’
Section 2745 of the PHS Act previously
defined this term to include only the 50
States and the District of Columbia, but
has now been amended to include U.S.
Territories.
3. Increased the amount of premiums
that a risk pool can charge and still
qualify for an operational grant. Section
2745 of the PHS Act previously required
that the premiums charged under the
pool not exceed 150 percent of the
premium for applicable standard risk
rates. As amended, it permits grants to
States with premiums of up to 200
percent of the standard risk rates, as
long as States with premiums greater
than 150 percent of the standard rate
use at least half of the grant funds to
reduce high risk pool premiums for
enrollees.
4. Removed the limitation that a
State’s grant not exceed 50 percent of its
operating losses.
5. Changed the funding allotment
formula. Previously, the grant funds
were to be allotted to States under a
relatively simple formula based on the
number of uninsured individuals in the
State. Under the new legislation, the
allotment formula is more complex. Of
the total appropriation for a given
year—if money is appropriated—twothirds would be available for grants to
cover operational losses. Of these funds,
40 percent is to be equally divided
among any of the 50 States and the
District of Columbia that apply. Another
30 percent of that amount is allotted
among all States that apply for grants
based on the ratio of uninsured
individuals in the State to uninsured
individuals in all States that apply. The
final 30 percent is to be allotted based
on the ratio of the number of
individuals enrolled in a State’s risk
pool to the number enrolled through the
risk pools of all the qualifying States
that apply. (Territories are eligible for
the proportional allotments, but only up
to a total of $1 million for all Territories
combined.)
6. Provided authority for ‘‘bonus
grants’’ to States (not including
Territories) that qualify for operational
grants. One-third of a total yearly
appropriation will be used to provide
grants to enable States to provide
specified supplemental consumer
benefits to enrollees or potential
enrollees of the qualified high risk pool.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:51 Apr 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
(A bonus grant is not to exceed 10
percent of the total for any one State.)
This final rule updates our regulations
at 45 CFR Part 148, Subpart E, Grants to
States for Operation of Qualified High
Risk Pools, to implement the changes
made by the Deficit Reduction Act of
2005 and the State High Risk Pool
Extension Act of 2006. Specific
instructions about the grant solicitation
and award process will be addressed in
official grant announcements or other
appropriate documents.
II. Provisions of the Interim Final Rule
On July 27, 2007, we published in the
Federal Register an interim final rule
with comment period (72 FR 41232). In
that rule we revised the regulation text
in 45 CFR part 148 to conform with the
State High Risk Pool Extension Act of
2006 and the DRA. These revisions are
discussed in detail below.
A. Definitions (§ 148.308)
We amended § 148.308 (Definitions)
to
• Add a definition of ‘‘bonus grants.’’
• Revise the definition of ‘‘qualified
high risk pool;’’ and
• Revise the definition of ‘‘State.’’
1. Bonus Grant
We added the following definition for
Bonus Grants—Funds that the Secretary
provides from the appropriated grant
funds to be used to provide
supplemental consumer benefits to
enrollees or potential enrollees in
qualified high risk pools.
2. Qualified High Risk Pool
We amended the definition at
§ 148.308 to reflect the exception added
by the Extension Act in section
2745(g)(1)(A) of the PHS Act.
Specifically, a State may elect to meet
the definition of a qualified high risk
pool under § 148.128(a)(2)(ii)(A) by
providing for enrollment of eligible
individuals through an acceptable
alternative mechanism (as defined for
purposes of section 2744 of the PHS)
that includes a high risk pool as a
component.
3. State
In accordance with the Extension Act,
we amended the definition to include
any of the 50 States and the District of
Columbia, and the U.S. Territories of
Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam,
American Samoa and the Northern
Mariana Islands.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
B. Grants for Operational Losses
(§ 148.310)
1. Eligibility Requirements for an
Operational Grant
This section specifies the eligibility
requirements for operational grants. A
State must meet all of the following
requirements to be eligible for a grant:
a. Maximum premium. We amended
§ 148.310 to reflect that the statute has
increased the maximum premium that a
risk pool can charge and still qualify for
a grant. The maximum has been
changed from 150 percent to 200
percent of the premium for applicable
standard risk rates for the State.
b. Continued funding. The statute
previously required that the pool have
in effect a mechanism reasonably
designed to ensure continued funding of
losses incurred by the State after the end
of FY 2004, which was the last year that
grants were authorized under the prior
appropriation. The statute, as revised by
the Extension Act, now requires that a
risk pool have such a mechanism to
ensure funding after the end of the last
fiscal year for which a grant is provided.
We interpret this to mean that the pool
has capacity or mechanisms in place
that can reasonably be expected to
ensure that it may operate in the future
without the benefit of Federal funding.
In the case of a qualified high risk
pool of a State that charges premiums
that exceed 150 percent of the premium
for applicable standard risks, the State
must use at least 50 percent of the
amount of the grant provided to the
State to reduce premiums for enrollees.
The application should demonstrate/
attest that the funds will be used this
way.
2. Amount of Grant Payment (§ 148.312)
Two-thirds of any amounts
appropriated are made available for
operational grants. An eligible State may
receive a grant to fund up to 100 percent
of the losses incurred in the operation
of its qualified high risk pool during the
fiscal year for which it is applying. The
grant may be less than 100 percent after
the allotment limits are applied, but in
no case will it be more than 100 percent.
Funds will be allocated in accordance
with § 148.312 to each State that meets
the eligibility requirements of § 148.310
and files an application in accordance
with § 148.316. Specifically:
• Forty percent of funds made
available under that section will be
equally divided among any of the 50
States and the District of Columbia that
meet the eligibility criteria for an
operational grant;
• Thirty percent of funds made
available will be divided among States
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
25APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 81 / Friday, April 25, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
(including territories) based on the
number of uninsured residents in the
State during the specified year as
compared to the total number of
uninsured residents in all States that
apply for grants;
• Thirty percent will be divided
among States (including territories)
based on the number of people in State
high risk pools during the specified year
as compared to all States that apply.
In accordance with the statute, in no
case will the aggregate amount allotted
and made available to the U.S.
Territories for a fiscal year exceed $1
million.
We will calculate the number of
uninsured individuals for each eligible
State by taking a 3-year average of the
number of uninsured individuals in that
State in the Current Population Survey
(CPS) of the Census Bureau. The 3-year
average will be calculated using
numbers available as of March 1 of each
year for the preceding 3-year period.
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with RULES
C. Bonus Grants
One-third of the total appropriation
will be available for the bonus grants.
These grants will be available to any one
of the 50 States and the District of
Columbia that receives an operational
grant under § 148.310. The grants must
be used to provide one or more of the
following benefits:
(1) Low income premium subsidies;
(2) Reduction in premium trends,
actual premium or other cost-sharing
requirements;
(3) An expansion or broadening of the
pool of individuals eligible for coverage,
such as through eliminating waiting
lists, increasing enrollment caps, or
providing flexibility in enrollment rules;
(4) Less stringent rules or additional
waiver authority with respect to
coverage of pre-existing conditions;
(5) Increased benefits; and
(6) The establishment of disease
management programs. In no case will
a State receive bonus grants that exceed
10 percent of the total funds allotted for
bonus grants in that fiscal year.
D. Periods During Which Eligible States
May Apply for a Grant (§ 148.314)
Funds were appropriated for Federal
FY 2006 and are authorized for FY 2008
through FY 2010. Funding for FY 2008,
FY 2009, and FY 2010 under the
Extension Act requires subsequent
enactment of appropriations authority.
States will be unable to apply for grants
unless and until such funding becomes
available. A State that meets the
eligibility requirements in § 148.310
may apply for a grant to fund losses that
were incurred during the State’s or
pool’s fiscal year ending prior to or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:51 Apr 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
during any federal fiscal year, 2007
through 2010 for which authorized
funds are appropriated, in connection
with the operation of its qualified high
risk pool. Grant funding is administered
on a retrospective basis (for example,
pools with losses incurred in 2005 may
apply for Federal FY 2006 grant funds).
If a State becomes eligible for a grant in
the middle of its fiscal year, a State may
apply for losses incurred in a partial
fiscal year if a partial year audit is done.
Only losses that are incurred after it is
established that a pool is eligible (that
is, that it is a qualified high risk pool as
defined by § 148.128(a)(2)(ii)) will
qualify for a grant. An eligible State
must apply for a grant no later than June
30 following the end of the State fiscal
year during which it incurred losses.
Each State may only be awarded one
grant per fiscal year. A grant for a partial
fiscal year counts as a full grant.
States that meet all of the eligibility
requirements in § 148.310 and submit
timely requests in accordance with
paragraph (c) of § 148.314 will receive
distribution of grant funds using the
following methodology:
• Grant applications for losses will be
on a retrospective basis. For example,
grant applications for 2006 funds are
based on the State’s FY 2005 incurred
losses.
• Grant allocations for each fiscal
year will be determined by taking all
grant applications received by June 30
of the Federal fiscal year and allocating
grant funds in accordance with
§ 148.312. In no case will a State receive
funds greater than 100 percent of its
losses.
If any excess funds remain after the
initial calculation, these excess funds
will be proportionately redistributed to
the States whose allocations have not
exceeded 100 percent of their losses.
This process will occur at the time of
the initial calculation and there will be
one annual allocation and distribution
by September 30 of each year.
Grant Application Instructions
(§ 148.316)
We amended § 148.316 to reflect the
addition of application requirements for
bonus grants. We changed the heading
of § 148.316(a), ‘‘Application package,’’
to ‘‘Application for operational losses.’’
We inserted a bonus grants section by
redesignating § 148.316(a)(3) as
§ 148.316(a)(4) and adding new
paragraph (a)(3), the bonus grants
requirements. The individual State
applying for a bonus grant must
provide:
(i) A narrative description with
detailed information about each one of
the following supplemental consumer
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22283
benefits to be provided to enrollees and/
or potential enrollees in the high risk
pool:
(A) Low income premium subsidies;
(B) Reduction in premium trends,
actual premium or other cost-sharing
requirements;
(C) An expansion or broadening of the
pool of individuals eligible for coverage,
such as through eliminating waiting
lists, increasing enrollment caps, or
providing flexibility in enrollment;
(D) Less stringent rules, or additional
waiver authority with respect to
coverage of pre-existing conditions;
(E) Increased benefits; and
(F) The establishment of disease
management programs.
(ii) A description of the population or
subset population that will be eligible
for the supplemental consumer benefits.
(iii) A projected budget for the use of
bonus grant funds using the SF 424 and
SF 424 A.
We revised the ‘‘Standard forms
application kit’’ in § 148.316(b). We
eliminated the text ‘‘Additional
Assurances’’ in ‘‘Standard forms
application kit,’’ paragraph (b)(1)(i).
We also changed the Web site URL
address for the ‘‘Standard forms kit’’
download at paragraph (b)(1)(ii) to
https://www.grants.gov.
There are no other changes to the
content of the ‘‘Standard forms
application kit.’’
In § 148.316(c), ‘‘Submission of
application package,’’ we deleted
paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) and replaced
with text that will read: All applications
should be submitted electronically via
https://www.grants.gov.
In § 148.316(d), ‘‘Application
deadlines,’’ we changed the applications
deadlines text to read: The deadline for
States to submit an application for
losses incurred in a State fiscal year is
June 30 of the next Federal fiscal year
that begins after the end of the State
fiscal year.
In § 148.316(e), ‘‘Where to submit an
application,’’ we changed the text to
read: Applications must be submitted to
https://www.grants.gov.
Funding Mechanism ( § 148.318)
We amended § 148.318, dealing with
continued funding of a risk pool. The
State must outline funding sources,
such as assessments and State general
revenues, which can cover the projected
costs and are reasonably designed to
ensure continued funding of losses a
State incurs in connection with the
operation of the qualified high risk pool
after the last fiscal year for which it is
applying for grant funds.
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
25APR1
22284
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 81 / Friday, April 25, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Grant Awards ( § 148.320)
We amended this section to specify
that the grantee will be required to
submit quarterly progress and financial
reports under part 92 of this title and in
accordance with section 2745(f) of the
Public Health Service Act, requiring the
Secretary to make an annual report to
Congress that includes information on
the use of these grant funds by the
States.
III. Analysis of and Responses to Public
Comments and Provisions of the Final
Regulations
We did not receive any public
comments on the July 27, 2007 interim
final rule with comment period.
Therefore, this final rule implements the
provisions of the interim final rule
without change.
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with RULES
IV. Collection of Information
Requirement
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, we are required to provide 30day notice in the Federal Register and
solicit public comment before a
collection of information requirement is
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval. In order to fairly evaluate
whether an information collection
should be approved by OMB, section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) requires
that we solicit comment on the
following issues:
• The need for the information
collection and its usefulness in carrying
out the proper functions of our agency.
• The accuracy of our estimate of the
information collection burden.
• The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected.
• Recommendations to minimize the
information collection burden on the
affected public, including automated
collection techniques.
We are soliciting public comment on
each of these issues for the following
sections of this document that contain
information collection requirements
(ICRs):
Section 148.316 Grant Application
Instructions
Section 148.316(a) requires each State
to compile an application package that
documents that it has met the
requirements for a grant. If a risk pool
entity applies on behalf of a State, it
must provide documentation that it has
been delegated appropriate authority by
the State.
The burden associated with this
requirement is subject to the PRA;
however, the structure of the
application collection and grant
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:51 Apr 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
monitoring reporting requirements of
the grants has not been changed from
the original grants program and is
currently approved under OMB control
number 0938–0887 ‘‘Matching Grants to
States for the Operation of High Risk
Pools and Supporting Regulations at 42
CFR 148.316, 148.318, and 148.320’’
with a current expiration date of 01/31/
2010. We are, however, revising this
package to include the additional
request under 148.316(a)(3) for (1)
Description of Type of Consumer
Benefits; (2) Description of the Eligible
Population for the consumer benefits;
and, (3) Projected Budget for the use of
Bonus Grants. We believe the burden
associated with the additional
information is already captured in the
currently approved OMB package
(#0938–0887).
Section 148.320
Grant Awards
Section 148.320(a)(2)(iii) states that a
grantee is required to submit quarterly
progress and financial reports under
part 92 of this title and in accordance
with section 2745(f) of the Public Health
Service Act, requiring the Secretary to
make an annual report to Congress that
includes information on the use of these
grant funds by States.
The burden associated with this
requirement is the time it would take for
a grantee to submit quarterly progress
and financial reports. We estimate it
will take one grantee 1 hour per quarter
to comply with this requirement.
If you comment on these information
collection and record keeping
requirements, please mail copies
directly to the following:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Office of Strategic
Operations and Regulatory Affairs,
Division of Regulations Development,
Attn.: Melissa Musotto, CMS–2260–
IFC, Room C5–14–03, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–
1850.
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Room 10235, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC
20503, Attn: Katherine Astrich, CMS
Desk Officer, CMS–2260–IFC,
katherine_astrich@omb.eop.gov. Fax
(202) 395–6974.
V. Regulatory Impact Statement
We have examined the impact of this
rule as required by Executive Order
12866 (September 1993, Regulatory
Planning and Review), the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (September 19,
1980, Pub. L. 96–354), the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4), and Executive Order 13132.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
if regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). A regulatory impact
analysis (RIA) must be prepared for
major rules with economically
significant effects ($100 million or more
in any 1 year). This rule does not reach
the economic threshold and thus is not
considered a major rule.
The RFA requires agencies to analyze
options for regulatory relief of small
businesses. For purposes of the RFA,
small entities include small businesses,
nonprofit organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions. Most
hospitals and most other providers and
suppliers are small entities, either by
nonprofit status or by having revenues
of $6 million to $29 million in any 1
year. Individuals and States are not
included in the definition of a small
entity. We did not prepare an analysis
for the RFA because we have
determined that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 also
requires that agencies assess anticipated
costs and benefits before issuing any
rule whose mandates require spending
in any 1 year of $100 million in 1995
dollars, updated annually for inflation.
That threshold level is currently
approximately $120 million. This rule
will have no consequential effect on
State, local, or tribal governments or on
the private sector.
Executive Order 13132 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates a
proposed rule (and subsequent final
rule) that imposes substantial direct
requirement costs on State and local
governments, preempts State law, or
otherwise has Federalism implications.
Since this regulation does not impose
any costs on State or local governments,
the requirements of E.O. 13132 are not
applicable.
In accordance with the provisions of
Executive Order 12866, this regulation
was reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 148
Administrative practice and
procedure, Health care Health
insurance, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
I For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Centers for Medicare &
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
25APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 81 / Friday, April 25, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Medicaid Services amends 45 CFR
chapter IV as set forth below:
PART 148—REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
INDIVIDUAL HEALTH INSURANCE
MARKET
1. The authority citation for part 148
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: Secs. 2741 through 2763, 2791,
and 2792 of the Public Health Service Act (42
U.S.C. 300gg–41 through 300gg–63, 300gg–
91, and 300gg–92).
Subpart E—Grants to States for
Operation of Qualified High Risk Pools
2. Section 148.306 is revised to read
as follows:
I
§ 148.306
Basis and scope.
This subpart implements section 2745
of the Public Health Service Act (PHS
Act). It extends grants to States that
have qualified high risk pools that meet
the specific requirements described in
§ 148.310. It also provides specific
instructions on how to apply for the
grants and outlines the grant review and
grant award processes.
I 3. Section 148.308 is amended by—
I A. Revising the definition for ‘‘bonus
grants.’’
I B. Revising the definition of
‘‘qualified high risk pool.’’
I C. Revising the definition of ‘‘State.’’
The revisions read as follows:
§ 148.308
Definitions.
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
Bonus grants means funds that the
Secretary provides from the
appropriated grant funds to be used to
provide supplemental consumer
benefits to enrollees or potential
enrollees in qualified high risk pools.
*
*
*
*
*
Qualified high risk pool as defined in
sections 2744(c)(2) and 2745(g) of the
PHS Act means a risk pool that—
(1) Provides to all eligible individuals
health insurance coverage (or
comparable coverage) that does not
impose any preexisting condition
exclusion with respect to such coverage
for all eligible individuals, except that it
may provide for enrollment of eligible
individuals through an acceptable
alternative mechanism (as defined for
purposes of section 2744 of the PHS
Act) that includes a high risk pool as a
component; and
(2) Provides for premium rates and
covered benefits for such coverage
consistent with standards included in
the NAIC Model Health Plan for
Uninsurable Individuals Act that was in
effect at the time of the enactment of the
Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1996 (August 21,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:51 Apr 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
1996) but only if the model has been
revised in State regulations to meet all
of the requirements of this part and title
27 of the PHS Act.
*
*
*
*
*
State means any of the 50 States and
the District of Columbia and includes
the U.S. Territories of Puerto Rico, the
Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa
and the Northern Mariana Islands.
*
*
*
*
*
I 4. Section 148.310 is amended by—
I A. Republishing the introductory text
to the section.
I B. Revising paragraph (b).
I C. Revising paragraph (d).
I D. Revising paragraphs (f), (g), and (h).
The republication, revisions, and
additions read as follows:
§ 148.310
grant.
Eligibility requirements for a
A State must meet all of the following
requirements to be eligible for a grant:
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The pool restricts premiums
charged under the pool to no more than
200 percent of the premium for
applicable standard risk rates for the
State.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) The pool has in effect a
mechanism reasonably designed to
ensure continued funding of losses
incurred by the State after the end of
each fiscal year for which the State
applies for Federal Funding in fiscal
year (FY) 2005 through FY 2010 in
connection with the operation of the
pool.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) In the case of a qualified high risk
pool in a State that charges premiums
that exceed 150 percent of the premium
for applicable standard risks, the State
will use at least 50 percent of the
amount of the grant provided to the
State to reduce premiums for enrollees.
(g) In no case will the aggregate
amount allotted and made available to
the U.S. Territories for a fiscal year
exceed $1,000,000 in total.
(h) Bonus grant funding must be used
for one or more of the following
benefits:
(1) Low income premium subsidies;
(2) Reduction in premium trends,
actual premium or other cost-sharing
requirements;
(3) An expansion or broadening of the
pool of individuals eligible for coverage,
such as through eliminating waiting
lists, increasing enrollment caps, or
providing flexibility in enrollment rules;
(4) Less stringent rules or additional
waiver authority with respect to
coverage of pre-existing conditions;
(5) Increased benefits; and
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22285
(6) The establishment of disease
management programs.
I 5. Section 148.312 is amended by—
I A. Revising paragraph (a).
I B. Revising paragraph (b).
I C. Revising paragraph (d).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 148.312
Amount of grant payment.
(a) An eligible State may receive a
grant to fund up to 100 percent of the
losses incurred in the operation of its
qualified high risk pool during the
period for which it is applying or a
lesser amount based on the limits of the
allotment under the formula.
(b) Funds will be allocated in
accordance with this paragraph to each
State that meets the eligibility
requirements of § 148.310 and files an
application in accordance with
§ 148.316. The amount will be divided
among the States that apply and are
awarded grants according to the
allotment rules that generally provide
that: 40 percent will be equally divided
among those States; 30 percent will be
divided among States and territories
based on their number of uninsured
residents in the State during the
specified year as compared to all States
that apply; and 30 percent will be
divided among States and territories
based on the number of people in State
high risk pools during the specified year
as compared to all States that apply.
For purposes of this paragraph:
(1) The number of uninsured
individuals is calculated for each
eligible State by taking a 3-year average
of the number of uninsured individuals
in that State in the Current Population
Survey (CPS) of the Census Bureau
during the period for which it is
applying. The 3-year average will be
calculated using numbers available as of
March 1 of each year.
(2) The number of individuals
enrolled in health care coverage through
the qualified high risk pool of the State
will be determined by attestation by the
State in its grant application and
verified for reasonability by the
Secretary through acceptable industry
data sources.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) One-third of the total
appropriation will be available for the
bonus grants. In no case will a State for
a fiscal year receive bonus grants that
exceed 10 percent of the total allotted
funds for bonus grants.
I 6. Section 148.314 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 148.314 Periods during which eligible
States may apply for a grant.
(a) General rule. A State that meets
the eligibility requirements in § 148.310
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
25APR1
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with RULES
22286
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 81 / Friday, April 25, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
may apply for a grant to fund losses that
were incurred during the State’s FYs
2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 in
connection with the operation of its
qualified high risk pool. Funding for FY
2007 through FY 2010 under the
Extension Act requires subsequent
enactment of appropriations authority.
States will be unable to apply for grants
unless and until such funding becomes
available. Grants funding is on a
retrospective basis and applies to the
States previous fiscal year. If a State
becomes eligible for a grant in the
middle of its fiscal year, a State may
apply for losses incurred in a partial
fiscal year if a partial year audit is done.
Only losses that are incurred after
eligibility is established will qualify for
a grant.
(b) Maximum number of grants. An
eligible State may only be awarded a
maximum of five grants, with one grant
per fiscal year. A grant for a partial
fiscal year counts as a full grant.
(c) Deadline for submitting grant
applications. The deadlines for
submitting grant applications are stated
in § 148.316(d).
(d) Distribution of grant funds. States
that meet all of the eligibility
requirements in § 148.310 and submit
timely requests in accordance with
paragraph (c) of this section will receive
an initial distribution of grant funds
using the following methodology: Grant
applications for losses will be on a
retrospective basis. For example, grant
applications for 2006 funds are based on
the State’s FY 2005 incurred losses.
Grant funding was appropriated for
Federal FY 2006 and is authorized to be
appropriated for Federal FYs 2008
through 2010.
(e) Grant allocations. Grant
allocations for each fiscal year will be
determined by taking all grant
applications during the period for
which States are applying and allocating
the funds in accordance with § 148.312.
(1) In no case will a State receive
funds greater than 100 percent of their
losses.
(2) If any excess funds remain after
the initial calculation, these excess
funds will be proportionately
redistributed to the States whose
allocations have not exceeded 100
percent of their losses.
I 7. Section 148.316 is amended by—
I A. Revising the introductory text to
the section.
I B. Amending paragraph (a)
introductory text by revising the
heading.
I C. Revising paragraph (a)(3).
I D. Revising paragraph (b).
I E. Revising paragraph (c).
I F. Revising paragraph (d).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:51 Apr 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
I
G. Revising paragraph (e).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 148.316
Grant application instructions.
Funding for FY 2008, FY 2009, and
FY 2010 under the Extension Act
requires the subsequent enactment of
appropriations authority. Funding was
appropriated for Federal FY 2006. States
will be unable to apply for FY 2008
through FY 2010 grants unless and until
such funding becomes available.
(a) Application for operational losses.
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Bonus grants for supplemental
consumer benefits. Provide detailed
information about the following
supplemental consumer benefits for
which the entity is applying:
(i) A narrative description of one or
more of the following of the
supplemental consumer benefits to be
provided to enrollees and/or potential
enrollees in the high risk pool:
(A) Low income premium subsidies;
(B) Reduction in premium trends,
actual premium or other cost-sharing
requirements;
(C) An expansion or broadening of the
pool of individuals eligible for coverage,
such as through eliminating waiting
lists, increasing enrollment caps, or
providing flexibility in enrollment;
(D) Less stringent rules, or additional
waiver authority with respect to
coverage of pre-existing conditions;
(E) Increased benefits; and
(F) The establishment of disease
management programs.
(ii) A description of the population or
subset population that will be eligible
for the supplemental consumer benefits.
(iii) A projected budget for the use of
bonus grant funds using the SF 424 A.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Standard form application kit—(1)
Forms. (i) The following standard forms
must be completed with an original
signature and enclosed as part of the
application package:
SF–424 Application for Federal
Assistance.
SF–424A Budget Information.
SF–424B Assurances NonConstruction Programs.
SF–LLL Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities Biographical Sketch.
(ii) These forms can be accessed from
the following Web site: https://
www.grants.gov.
(2) Other narrative. All other narrative
in the application must be submitted on
81⁄2 x 11 inches white paper.
(c) Application submission.
Submission of application package is
through https://www.grants.gov.
Submissions by facsimile (fax)
transmissions will not be accepted.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(d) Application deadlines. (1) The
deadline for States to submit an
application for losses incurred in a State
fiscal year is June 30 of the next Federal
fiscal year that begins after the end of
the State fiscal year. Funding for FY
2008, FY 2009, and FY 2010 under the
Extension Act requires the subsequent
enactment of appropriations authority.
Funding was appropriated for Federal
FY 2006. States will be unable to apply
for FY 2008 through FY 2010 grants
unless and until such funding becomes
available.
(2) Deadline for States to submit an
application for losses incurred in their
fiscal year 2005. States had to submit an
application to CMS no later than June
30, 2006.
(3) Deadline for States to submit an
application for losses incurred in their
fiscal year 2006. States must submit an
application to CMS by no later than
June 30, 2007.
(4) Deadline for States to submit an
application for losses incurred in their
fiscal year 2007. States must submit an
application to CMS by no later than
June 30, 2008.
(5) Deadline for States to submit an
application for losses incurred in their
fiscal year 2008. States must submit an
application to CMS by no later than
June 30, 2009.
(6) Deadline for States to submit an
application for losses incurred in their
fiscal year 2009. States must submit an
application to CMS by no later than
June 30, 2010.
(e) Where to submit an application.
Applications must be submitted to
https://www.grants.gov. Submissions by
facsimile (fax) transmissions will not be
accepted.
I 8. Section 148.318 is amended by
revising paragraph (d)(2) to read as
follows:
§ 148.318
Grant application review.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) Funding mechanism. The State has
outlined funding sources, such as
assessments and State general revenues,
which can cover the projected costs and
are reasonably designed to ensure
continued funding of losses a State
incurs in connection with the operation
of the qualified high risk pool after each
fiscal year for which it is applying for
grant funds.
I 9. Section 148.320 is amended by
revising paragraph (a)(2)(iii) to read as
follows:
§ 148.320
Grant awards.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) The grantee will be required to
submit quarterly progress and financial
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
25APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 81 / Friday, April 25, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
reports under part 92 of this title and in
accordance with section 2745(f) of the
Public Health Service Act, requiring the
Secretary to make an annual report to
Congress that includes information on
the use of these grant funds by States.
*
*
*
*
*
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.778, Medical Assistance
Program)
Dated: January 17, 2008.
Kerry Weems,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
Approved: January 17, 2008.
Michael O. Leavitt,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–9066 Filed 4–24–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 230
[Docket No. 080414564–8565–01]
RIN 0648–AW71
Whaling Provisions; Aboriginal
Subsistence Whaling Quotas
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notification.
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS announces the
aboriginal subsistence whaling quota it
has assigned to the Alaska Eskimo
Whaling Commission (AEWC) for
bowhead whales, and other limitations
deriving from regulations adopted at the
59th Annual Meeting of the International
Whaling Commission (IWC). For 2008,
the quota is 75 bowhead whales struck.
This quota and other limitations govern
the harvest of bowhead whales by
members of the AEWC.
DATES: Effective April 25, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Office of International
Affairs, National Marine Fisheries
Service, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver
Spring, MD 20910.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cheri McCarty, (301) 713–9090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Aboriginal
subsistence whaling in the United States
is governed by the Whaling Convention
Act (16 U.S.C. 916 et seq.). Regulations
that implement the Act, found at 50 CFR
230.6, require the Secretary of
Commerce (Secretary) to publish, at
least annually, aboriginal subsistence
whaling quotas and any other
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:51 Apr 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
limitations on aboriginal subsistence
whaling deriving from regulations of the
IWC.
At the 59th Annual Meeting of the
IWC, the Commission set quotas for
aboriginal subsistence use of bowhead
whales from the Bering-ChukchiBeaufort Seas stock. The bowhead quota
was based on a joint request by the
United States and the Russian
Federation, accompanied by
documentation concerning the needs of
two Native groups: Alaska Eskimos and
Chukotka Natives in the Russian Far
East.
This action by the IWC thus
authorized aboriginal subsistence
whaling by the AEWC for bowhead
whales. This aboriginal subsistence
harvest is conducted in accordance with
a cooperative agreement between NOAA
and the AEWC.
The IWC set a 5-year block quota of
280 bowhead whales landed. For each
of the years 2008 through 2012, the
number of bowhead whales struck may
not exceed 67, except that any unused
portion of a strike quota from any year,
including 15 unused strikes from the
2003 through 2007 quota, may be
carried forward. No more than 15 strikes
may be added to the strike quota for any
one year. At the end of the 2007 harvest,
there were 15 unused strikes available
for carry-forward, so the combined
strike quota for 2008 is 82 (67 + 15).
This arrangement ensures that the
total quota of bowhead whales landed
and struck in 2008 will not exceed the
quotas set by the IWC. Under an
arrangement between the United States
and the Russian Federation, the Russian
natives may use no more than seven
strikes, and the Alaska Eskimos may use
no more than 75 strikes.
Through its cooperative agreement
with the AEWC, NOAA has assigned 75
strikes to the Alaska Eskimos. The
AEWC will allocate these strikes among
the 11 villages whose cultural and
subsistence needs have been
documented in past requests for
bowhead quotas from the IWC, and will
ensure that its hunters use no more than
75 strikes.
Other Limitations
The IWC regulations, as well as the
NOAA regulation at 50 CFR 230.4(c),
forbid the taking of calves or any whale
accompanied by a calf.
NOAA regulations (at 50 CFR 230.4)
contain a number of other prohibitions
relating to aboriginal subsistence
whaling, some of which are summarized
here. Only licensed whaling captains or
crew under the control of those captains
may engage in whaling. They must
follow the provisions of the relevant
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22287
cooperative agreement between NOAA
and a Native American whaling
organization. The aboriginal hunters
must have adequate crew, supplies, and
equipment. They may not receive
money for participating in the hunt. No
person may sell or offer for sale whale
products from whales taken in the hunt,
except for authentic articles of Native
handicrafts. Captains may not continue
to whale after the relevant quota is
taken, after the season has been closed,
or if their licenses have been suspended.
They may not engage in whaling in a
wasteful manner.
Dated: April 21, 2008.
James W. Balsiger,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8–9111 Filed 4–24–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 010319075–1217–02]
RIN 0648–XF92
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Tilefish Fishery; Quota
Harvested for Part-time Category
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; tilefish Parttime permit category closure.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS announces that the
percentage of the tilefish annual total
allowable landings (TAL) available to
the tilefish Part-time permit category for
the 2008 fishing year has been
harvested. Therefore, commercial
vessels fishing under the Part-time
tilefish category may not harvest tilefish
from within the Golden Tilefish
Management Unit for the remainder of
the 2008 fishing year (through October
31, 2008) as of April 25, 2008.
Regulations governing the tilefish
fishery require publication of this
notification to advise the public of this
closure.
DATES: Effective 0001 hrs local time,
April 25, 2008, through 2400 hrs local
time, October 31, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Timothy A. Cardiasmenos, Fishery
Policy Analyst, at (978) 281–9204.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulations governing the tilefish
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
25APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 81 (Friday, April 25, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22281-22287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-9066]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
45 CFR Part 148
[CMS-2260-F]
RIN 0938-A046
Grants to States for Operation of Qualified High Risk Pools
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Final Rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule finalizes the interim final rule with comment period
that was published on July 27, 2007, regarding extended funding for
seed and operational grants for State High Risk Pools under the Public
Health Service Act.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations are effective May 27, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica Kahn, (410) 786-9361, or John
Young, (410) 786-0505.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Trade Adjustment Assistance Reform Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107-
210) added section 2745 of the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act) to
provide for two types of grants to States for the promotion of
``qualified high risk pools.'' These pools provide health coverage to
high-risk individuals who may find private health insurance unavailable
or unaffordable. Under this provision, a pool could meet the definition
of a ``qualified'' high risk pool for purposes of section 2745 only if
it met the definition of a qualified high risk pool in section
2744(c)(2) of the PHS Act. Section 2744 deals with how States can
satisfy the requirement of section 2741 of the PHS Act to guarantee
access to health coverage for individuals who meet the definition of an
``eligible individual'' under section 2741, as added by the Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). These
individuals are commonly referred to as ``HIPAA-eligible'' individuals.
Under section 2744(c)(2) of the PHS Act, a qualified high risk pool
must provide health coverage without a pre-existing condition exclusion
to ``all'' HIPAA-eligible individuals. This meant that State high risk
pools that did not allow all HIPAA-eligible individuals into the pool
without a pre-existing condition exclusion could not meet the
definition of a ``qualified'' risk pool.
The two types of grants authorized by the legislation were ``seed
grants'' for States that had not yet created a high risk pool, and
``operational'' grants to offset losses incurred by States that operate
a qualified high risk pool. Under the prior law, in order for a risk
pool to qualify for an operational grant, it could not charge premiums
that exceeded 150 percent of the premium for applicable standard risk
rates. Moreover, the amount of the grants was limited to 50 percent of
the losses incurred by a State.
Section 6202 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (Pub. L. 109-171)
(DRA) and the State High Risk Pool Extension Act of 2006 (Pub. L. 109-
172) (Extension Act) extended funding for seed and operational grants
for State High Risk Pools and amended section 2745 of the PHS Act. The
Extension Act made the following changes:
1. Expanded the definition of a ``qualified high risk pool.'' As
noted above, section 2745(d) of the PHS Act previously defined the term
to have the same meaning as in section 2744(c)(2) of the PHS Act, which
required that the risk pool provide coverage to ``all'' HIPAA-eligible
individuals (as defined in Sec. 148.103), without any pre-existing
[[Page 22282]]
condition exclusion. The revised definition specifies that, for
purposes of grants under section 2745, a risk pool can be qualified
even if the State uses other mechanisms beyond the risk pool to ensure
that health coverage is provided to all HIPAA-eligibles.
2. Expanded the definition of ``State.'' Section 2745 of the PHS
Act previously defined this term to include only the 50 States and the
District of Columbia, but has now been amended to include U.S.
Territories.
3. Increased the amount of premiums that a risk pool can charge and
still qualify for an operational grant. Section 2745 of the PHS Act
previously required that the premiums charged under the pool not exceed
150 percent of the premium for applicable standard risk rates. As
amended, it permits grants to States with premiums of up to 200 percent
of the standard risk rates, as long as States with premiums greater
than 150 percent of the standard rate use at least half of the grant
funds to reduce high risk pool premiums for enrollees.
4. Removed the limitation that a State's grant not exceed 50
percent of its operating losses.
5. Changed the funding allotment formula. Previously, the grant
funds were to be allotted to States under a relatively simple formula
based on the number of uninsured individuals in the State. Under the
new legislation, the allotment formula is more complex. Of the total
appropriation for a given year--if money is appropriated--two-thirds
would be available for grants to cover operational losses. Of these
funds, 40 percent is to be equally divided among any of the 50 States
and the District of Columbia that apply. Another 30 percent of that
amount is allotted among all States that apply for grants based on the
ratio of uninsured individuals in the State to uninsured individuals in
all States that apply. The final 30 percent is to be allotted based on
the ratio of the number of individuals enrolled in a State's risk pool
to the number enrolled through the risk pools of all the qualifying
States that apply. (Territories are eligible for the proportional
allotments, but only up to a total of $1 million for all Territories
combined.)
6. Provided authority for ``bonus grants'' to States (not including
Territories) that qualify for operational grants. One-third of a total
yearly appropriation will be used to provide grants to enable States to
provide specified supplemental consumer benefits to enrollees or
potential enrollees of the qualified high risk pool. (A bonus grant is
not to exceed 10 percent of the total for any one State.)
This final rule updates our regulations at 45 CFR Part 148, Subpart
E, Grants to States for Operation of Qualified High Risk Pools, to
implement the changes made by the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 and the
State High Risk Pool Extension Act of 2006. Specific instructions about
the grant solicitation and award process will be addressed in official
grant announcements or other appropriate documents.
II. Provisions of the Interim Final Rule
On July 27, 2007, we published in the Federal Register an interim
final rule with comment period (72 FR 41232). In that rule we revised
the regulation text in 45 CFR part 148 to conform with the State High
Risk Pool Extension Act of 2006 and the DRA. These revisions are
discussed in detail below.
A. Definitions (Sec. 148.308)
We amended Sec. 148.308 (Definitions) to
Add a definition of ``bonus grants.''
Revise the definition of ``qualified high risk pool;'' and
Revise the definition of ``State.''
1. Bonus Grant
We added the following definition for Bonus Grants--Funds that the
Secretary provides from the appropriated grant funds to be used to
provide supplemental consumer benefits to enrollees or potential
enrollees in qualified high risk pools.
2. Qualified High Risk Pool
We amended the definition at Sec. 148.308 to reflect the exception
added by the Extension Act in section 2745(g)(1)(A) of the PHS Act.
Specifically, a State may elect to meet the definition of a qualified
high risk pool under Sec. 148.128(a)(2)(ii)(A) by providing for
enrollment of eligible individuals through an acceptable alternative
mechanism (as defined for purposes of section 2744 of the PHS) that
includes a high risk pool as a component.
3. State
In accordance with the Extension Act, we amended the definition to
include any of the 50 States and the District of Columbia, and the U.S.
Territories of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa
and the Northern Mariana Islands.
B. Grants for Operational Losses (Sec. 148.310)
1. Eligibility Requirements for an Operational Grant
This section specifies the eligibility requirements for operational
grants. A State must meet all of the following requirements to be
eligible for a grant:
a. Maximum premium. We amended Sec. 148.310 to reflect that the
statute has increased the maximum premium that a risk pool can charge
and still qualify for a grant. The maximum has been changed from 150
percent to 200 percent of the premium for applicable standard risk
rates for the State.
b. Continued funding. The statute previously required that the pool
have in effect a mechanism reasonably designed to ensure continued
funding of losses incurred by the State after the end of FY 2004, which
was the last year that grants were authorized under the prior
appropriation. The statute, as revised by the Extension Act, now
requires that a risk pool have such a mechanism to ensure funding after
the end of the last fiscal year for which a grant is provided. We
interpret this to mean that the pool has capacity or mechanisms in
place that can reasonably be expected to ensure that it may operate in
the future without the benefit of Federal funding.
In the case of a qualified high risk pool of a State that charges
premiums that exceed 150 percent of the premium for applicable standard
risks, the State must use at least 50 percent of the amount of the
grant provided to the State to reduce premiums for enrollees. The
application should demonstrate/attest that the funds will be used this
way.
2. Amount of Grant Payment (Sec. 148.312)
Two-thirds of any amounts appropriated are made available for
operational grants. An eligible State may receive a grant to fund up to
100 percent of the losses incurred in the operation of its qualified
high risk pool during the fiscal year for which it is applying. The
grant may be less than 100 percent after the allotment limits are
applied, but in no case will it be more than 100 percent.
Funds will be allocated in accordance with Sec. 148.312 to each
State that meets the eligibility requirements of Sec. 148.310 and
files an application in accordance with Sec. 148.316. Specifically:
Forty percent of funds made available under that section
will be equally divided among any of the 50 States and the District of
Columbia that meet the eligibility criteria for an operational grant;
Thirty percent of funds made available will be divided
among States
[[Page 22283]]
(including territories) based on the number of uninsured residents in
the State during the specified year as compared to the total number of
uninsured residents in all States that apply for grants;
Thirty percent will be divided among States (including
territories) based on the number of people in State high risk pools
during the specified year as compared to all States that apply.
In accordance with the statute, in no case will the aggregate
amount allotted and made available to the U.S. Territories for a fiscal
year exceed $1 million.
We will calculate the number of uninsured individuals for each
eligible State by taking a 3-year average of the number of uninsured
individuals in that State in the Current Population Survey (CPS) of the
Census Bureau. The 3-year average will be calculated using numbers
available as of March 1 of each year for the preceding 3-year period.
C. Bonus Grants
One-third of the total appropriation will be available for the
bonus grants. These grants will be available to any one of the 50
States and the District of Columbia that receives an operational grant
under Sec. 148.310. The grants must be used to provide one or more of
the following benefits:
(1) Low income premium subsidies;
(2) Reduction in premium trends, actual premium or other cost-
sharing requirements;
(3) An expansion or broadening of the pool of individuals eligible
for coverage, such as through eliminating waiting lists, increasing
enrollment caps, or providing flexibility in enrollment rules;
(4) Less stringent rules or additional waiver authority with
respect to coverage of pre-existing conditions;
(5) Increased benefits; and
(6) The establishment of disease management programs. In no case
will a State receive bonus grants that exceed 10 percent of the total
funds allotted for bonus grants in that fiscal year.
D. Periods During Which Eligible States May Apply for a Grant (Sec.
148.314)
Funds were appropriated for Federal FY 2006 and are authorized for
FY 2008 through FY 2010. Funding for FY 2008, FY 2009, and FY 2010
under the Extension Act requires subsequent enactment of appropriations
authority. States will be unable to apply for grants unless and until
such funding becomes available. A State that meets the eligibility
requirements in Sec. 148.310 may apply for a grant to fund losses that
were incurred during the State's or pool's fiscal year ending prior to
or during any federal fiscal year, 2007 through 2010 for which
authorized funds are appropriated, in connection with the operation of
its qualified high risk pool. Grant funding is administered on a
retrospective basis (for example, pools with losses incurred in 2005
may apply for Federal FY 2006 grant funds). If a State becomes eligible
for a grant in the middle of its fiscal year, a State may apply for
losses incurred in a partial fiscal year if a partial year audit is
done. Only losses that are incurred after it is established that a pool
is eligible (that is, that it is a qualified high risk pool as defined
by Sec. 148.128(a)(2)(ii)) will qualify for a grant. An eligible State
must apply for a grant no later than June 30 following the end of the
State fiscal year during which it incurred losses. Each State may only
be awarded one grant per fiscal year. A grant for a partial fiscal year
counts as a full grant.
States that meet all of the eligibility requirements in Sec.
148.310 and submit timely requests in accordance with paragraph (c) of
Sec. 148.314 will receive distribution of grant funds using the
following methodology:
Grant applications for losses will be on a retrospective
basis. For example, grant applications for 2006 funds are based on the
State's FY 2005 incurred losses.
Grant allocations for each fiscal year will be determined
by taking all grant applications received by June 30 of the Federal
fiscal year and allocating grant funds in accordance with Sec.
148.312. In no case will a State receive funds greater than 100 percent
of its losses.
If any excess funds remain after the initial calculation, these
excess funds will be proportionately redistributed to the States whose
allocations have not exceeded 100 percent of their losses. This process
will occur at the time of the initial calculation and there will be one
annual allocation and distribution by September 30 of each year.
Grant Application Instructions (Sec. 148.316)
We amended Sec. 148.316 to reflect the addition of application
requirements for bonus grants. We changed the heading of Sec.
148.316(a), ``Application package,'' to ``Application for operational
losses.'' We inserted a bonus grants section by redesignating Sec.
148.316(a)(3) as Sec. 148.316(a)(4) and adding new paragraph (a)(3),
the bonus grants requirements. The individual State applying for a
bonus grant must provide:
(i) A narrative description with detailed information about each
one of the following supplemental consumer benefits to be provided to
enrollees and/or potential enrollees in the high risk pool:
(A) Low income premium subsidies;
(B) Reduction in premium trends, actual premium or other cost-
sharing requirements;
(C) An expansion or broadening of the pool of individuals eligible
for coverage, such as through eliminating waiting lists, increasing
enrollment caps, or providing flexibility in enrollment;
(D) Less stringent rules, or additional waiver authority with
respect to coverage of pre-existing conditions;
(E) Increased benefits; and
(F) The establishment of disease management programs.
(ii) A description of the population or subset population that will
be eligible for the supplemental consumer benefits.
(iii) A projected budget for the use of bonus grant funds using the
SF 424 and SF 424 A.
We revised the ``Standard forms application kit'' in Sec.
148.316(b). We eliminated the text ``Additional Assurances'' in
``Standard forms application kit,'' paragraph (b)(1)(i).
We also changed the Web site URL address for the ``Standard forms
kit'' download at paragraph (b)(1)(ii) to https://www.grants.gov.
There are no other changes to the content of the ``Standard forms
application kit.''
In Sec. 148.316(c), ``Submission of application package,'' we
deleted paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) and replaced with text that will
read: All applications should be submitted electronically via https://
www.grants.gov.
In Sec. 148.316(d), ``Application deadlines,'' we changed the
applications deadlines text to read: The deadline for States to submit
an application for losses incurred in a State fiscal year is June 30 of
the next Federal fiscal year that begins after the end of the State
fiscal year.
In Sec. 148.316(e), ``Where to submit an application,'' we changed
the text to read: Applications must be submitted to https://
www.grants.gov.
Funding Mechanism ( Sec. 148.318)
We amended Sec. 148.318, dealing with continued funding of a risk
pool. The State must outline funding sources, such as assessments and
State general revenues, which can cover the projected costs and are
reasonably designed to ensure continued funding of losses a State
incurs in connection with the operation of the qualified high risk pool
after the last fiscal year for which it is applying for grant funds.
[[Page 22284]]
Grant Awards ( Sec. 148.320)
We amended this section to specify that the grantee will be
required to submit quarterly progress and financial reports under part
92 of this title and in accordance with section 2745(f) of the Public
Health Service Act, requiring the Secretary to make an annual report to
Congress that includes information on the use of these grant funds by
the States.
III. Analysis of and Responses to Public Comments and Provisions of the
Final Regulations
We did not receive any public comments on the July 27, 2007 interim
final rule with comment period. Therefore, this final rule implements
the provisions of the interim final rule without change.
IV. Collection of Information Requirement
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we are required to
provide 30-day notice in the Federal Register and solicit public
comment before a collection of information requirement is submitted to
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. In
order to fairly evaluate whether an information collection should be
approved by OMB, section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA) requires that we solicit comment on the following issues:
The need for the information collection and its usefulness
in carrying out the proper functions of our agency.
The accuracy of our estimate of the information collection
burden.
The quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected.
Recommendations to minimize the information collection
burden on the affected public, including automated collection
techniques.
We are soliciting public comment on each of these issues for the
following sections of this document that contain information collection
requirements (ICRs):
Section 148.316 Grant Application Instructions
Section 148.316(a) requires each State to compile an application
package that documents that it has met the requirements for a grant. If
a risk pool entity applies on behalf of a State, it must provide
documentation that it has been delegated appropriate authority by the
State.
The burden associated with this requirement is subject to the PRA;
however, the structure of the application collection and grant
monitoring reporting requirements of the grants has not been changed
from the original grants program and is currently approved under OMB
control number 0938-0887 ``Matching Grants to States for the Operation
of High Risk Pools and Supporting Regulations at 42 CFR 148.316,
148.318, and 148.320'' with a current expiration date of 01/31/2010. We
are, however, revising this package to include the additional request
under 148.316(a)(3) for (1) Description of Type of Consumer Benefits;
(2) Description of the Eligible Population for the consumer benefits;
and, (3) Projected Budget for the use of Bonus Grants. We believe the
burden associated with the additional information is already captured
in the currently approved OMB package (0938-0887).
Section 148.320 Grant Awards
Section 148.320(a)(2)(iii) states that a grantee is required to
submit quarterly progress and financial reports under part 92 of this
title and in accordance with section 2745(f) of the Public Health
Service Act, requiring the Secretary to make an annual report to
Congress that includes information on the use of these grant funds by
States.
The burden associated with this requirement is the time it would
take for a grantee to submit quarterly progress and financial reports.
We estimate it will take one grantee 1 hour per quarter to comply with
this requirement.
If you comment on these information collection and record keeping
requirements, please mail copies directly to the following:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of Strategic
Operations and Regulatory Affairs, Division of Regulations Development,
Attn.: Melissa Musotto, CMS-2260-IFC, Room C5-14-03, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC
20503, Attn: Katherine Astrich, CMS Desk Officer, CMS-2260-IFC,
katherine_astrich@omb.eop.gov. Fax (202) 395-6974.
V. Regulatory Impact Statement
We have examined the impact of this rule as required by Executive
Order 12866 (September 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review), the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (September 19, 1980, Pub. L. 96-354),
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4), and Executive
Order 13132.
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and equity). A regulatory impact
analysis (RIA) must be prepared for major rules with economically
significant effects ($100 million or more in any 1 year). This rule
does not reach the economic threshold and thus is not considered a
major rule.
The RFA requires agencies to analyze options for regulatory relief
of small businesses. For purposes of the RFA, small entities include
small businesses, nonprofit organizations, and small governmental
jurisdictions. Most hospitals and most other providers and suppliers
are small entities, either by nonprofit status or by having revenues of
$6 million to $29 million in any 1 year. Individuals and States are not
included in the definition of a small entity. We did not prepare an
analysis for the RFA because we have determined that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 also
requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule whose mandates require spending in any 1 year of $100
million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for inflation. That threshold
level is currently approximately $120 million. This rule will have no
consequential effect on State, local, or tribal governments or on the
private sector.
Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an
agency must meet when it promulgates a proposed rule (and subsequent
final rule) that imposes substantial direct requirement costs on State
and local governments, preempts State law, or otherwise has Federalism
implications. Since this regulation does not impose any costs on State
or local governments, the requirements of E.O. 13132 are not
applicable.
In accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 12866, this
regulation was reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 148
Administrative practice and procedure, Health care Health
insurance, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Centers for Medicare &
[[Page 22285]]
Medicaid Services amends 45 CFR chapter IV as set forth below:
PART 148--REQUIREMENTS FOR THE INDIVIDUAL HEALTH INSURANCE MARKET
0
1. The authority citation for part 148 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 2741 through 2763, 2791, and 2792 of the Public
Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg-41 through 300gg-63, 300gg-91,
and 300gg-92).
Subpart E--Grants to States for Operation of Qualified High Risk
Pools
0
2. Section 148.306 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 148.306 Basis and scope.
This subpart implements section 2745 of the Public Health Service
Act (PHS Act). It extends grants to States that have qualified high
risk pools that meet the specific requirements described in Sec.
148.310. It also provides specific instructions on how to apply for the
grants and outlines the grant review and grant award processes.
0
3. Section 148.308 is amended by--
0
A. Revising the definition for ``bonus grants.''
0
B. Revising the definition of ``qualified high risk pool.''
0
C. Revising the definition of ``State.''
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 148.308 Definitions.
* * * * *
Bonus grants means funds that the Secretary provides from the
appropriated grant funds to be used to provide supplemental consumer
benefits to enrollees or potential enrollees in qualified high risk
pools.
* * * * *
Qualified high risk pool as defined in sections 2744(c)(2) and
2745(g) of the PHS Act means a risk pool that--
(1) Provides to all eligible individuals health insurance coverage
(or comparable coverage) that does not impose any preexisting condition
exclusion with respect to such coverage for all eligible individuals,
except that it may provide for enrollment of eligible individuals
through an acceptable alternative mechanism (as defined for purposes of
section 2744 of the PHS Act) that includes a high risk pool as a
component; and
(2) Provides for premium rates and covered benefits for such
coverage consistent with standards included in the NAIC Model Health
Plan for Uninsurable Individuals Act that was in effect at the time of
the enactment of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
Act of 1996 (August 21, 1996) but only if the model has been revised in
State regulations to meet all of the requirements of this part and
title 27 of the PHS Act.
* * * * *
State means any of the 50 States and the District of Columbia and
includes the U.S. Territories of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam,
American Samoa and the Northern Mariana Islands.
* * * * *
0
4. Section 148.310 is amended by--
0
A. Republishing the introductory text to the section.
0
B. Revising paragraph (b).
0
C. Revising paragraph (d).
0
D. Revising paragraphs (f), (g), and (h).
The republication, revisions, and additions read as follows:
Sec. 148.310 Eligibility requirements for a grant.
A State must meet all of the following requirements to be eligible
for a grant:
* * * * *
(b) The pool restricts premiums charged under the pool to no more
than 200 percent of the premium for applicable standard risk rates for
the State.
* * * * *
(d) The pool has in effect a mechanism reasonably designed to
ensure continued funding of losses incurred by the State after the end
of each fiscal year for which the State applies for Federal Funding in
fiscal year (FY) 2005 through FY 2010 in connection with the operation
of the pool.
* * * * *
(f) In the case of a qualified high risk pool in a State that
charges premiums that exceed 150 percent of the premium for applicable
standard risks, the State will use at least 50 percent of the amount of
the grant provided to the State to reduce premiums for enrollees.
(g) In no case will the aggregate amount allotted and made
available to the U.S. Territories for a fiscal year exceed $1,000,000
in total.
(h) Bonus grant funding must be used for one or more of the
following benefits:
(1) Low income premium subsidies;
(2) Reduction in premium trends, actual premium or other cost-
sharing requirements;
(3) An expansion or broadening of the pool of individuals eligible
for coverage, such as through eliminating waiting lists, increasing
enrollment caps, or providing flexibility in enrollment rules;
(4) Less stringent rules or additional waiver authority with
respect to coverage of pre-existing conditions;
(5) Increased benefits; and
(6) The establishment of disease management programs.
0
5. Section 148.312 is amended by--
0
A. Revising paragraph (a).
0
B. Revising paragraph (b).
0
C. Revising paragraph (d).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 148.312 Amount of grant payment.
(a) An eligible State may receive a grant to fund up to 100 percent
of the losses incurred in the operation of its qualified high risk pool
during the period for which it is applying or a lesser amount based on
the limits of the allotment under the formula.
(b) Funds will be allocated in accordance with this paragraph to
each State that meets the eligibility requirements of Sec. 148.310 and
files an application in accordance with Sec. 148.316. The amount will
be divided among the States that apply and are awarded grants according
to the allotment rules that generally provide that: 40 percent will be
equally divided among those States; 30 percent will be divided among
States and territories based on their number of uninsured residents in
the State during the specified year as compared to all States that
apply; and 30 percent will be divided among States and territories
based on the number of people in State high risk pools during the
specified year as compared to all States that apply.
For purposes of this paragraph:
(1) The number of uninsured individuals is calculated for each
eligible State by taking a 3-year average of the number of uninsured
individuals in that State in the Current Population Survey (CPS) of the
Census Bureau during the period for which it is applying. The 3-year
average will be calculated using numbers available as of March 1 of
each year.
(2) The number of individuals enrolled in health care coverage
through the qualified high risk pool of the State will be determined by
attestation by the State in its grant application and verified for
reasonability by the Secretary through acceptable industry data
sources.
* * * * *
(d) One-third of the total appropriation will be available for the
bonus grants. In no case will a State for a fiscal year receive bonus
grants that exceed 10 percent of the total allotted funds for bonus
grants.
0
6. Section 148.314 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 148.314 Periods during which eligible States may apply for a
grant.
(a) General rule. A State that meets the eligibility requirements
in Sec. 148.310
[[Page 22286]]
may apply for a grant to fund losses that were incurred during the
State's FYs 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 in connection with the
operation of its qualified high risk pool. Funding for FY 2007 through
FY 2010 under the Extension Act requires subsequent enactment of
appropriations authority. States will be unable to apply for grants
unless and until such funding becomes available. Grants funding is on a
retrospective basis and applies to the States previous fiscal year. If
a State becomes eligible for a grant in the middle of its fiscal year,
a State may apply for losses incurred in a partial fiscal year if a
partial year audit is done. Only losses that are incurred after
eligibility is established will qualify for a grant.
(b) Maximum number of grants. An eligible State may only be awarded
a maximum of five grants, with one grant per fiscal year. A grant for a
partial fiscal year counts as a full grant.
(c) Deadline for submitting grant applications. The deadlines for
submitting grant applications are stated in Sec. 148.316(d).
(d) Distribution of grant funds. States that meet all of the
eligibility requirements in Sec. 148.310 and submit timely requests in
accordance with paragraph (c) of this section will receive an initial
distribution of grant funds using the following methodology: Grant
applications for losses will be on a retrospective basis. For example,
grant applications for 2006 funds are based on the State's FY 2005
incurred losses. Grant funding was appropriated for Federal FY 2006 and
is authorized to be appropriated for Federal FYs 2008 through 2010.
(e) Grant allocations. Grant allocations for each fiscal year will
be determined by taking all grant applications during the period for
which States are applying and allocating the funds in accordance with
Sec. 148.312.
(1) In no case will a State receive funds greater than 100 percent
of their losses.
(2) If any excess funds remain after the initial calculation, these
excess funds will be proportionately redistributed to the States whose
allocations have not exceeded 100 percent of their losses.
0
7. Section 148.316 is amended by--
0
A. Revising the introductory text to the section.
0
B. Amending paragraph (a) introductory text by revising the heading.
0
C. Revising paragraph (a)(3).
0
D. Revising paragraph (b).
0
E. Revising paragraph (c).
0
F. Revising paragraph (d).
0
G. Revising paragraph (e).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 148.316 Grant application instructions.
Funding for FY 2008, FY 2009, and FY 2010 under the Extension Act
requires the subsequent enactment of appropriations authority. Funding
was appropriated for Federal FY 2006. States will be unable to apply
for FY 2008 through FY 2010 grants unless and until such funding
becomes available.
(a) Application for operational losses. * * *
* * * * *
(3) Bonus grants for supplemental consumer benefits. Provide
detailed information about the following supplemental consumer benefits
for which the entity is applying:
(i) A narrative description of one or more of the following of the
supplemental consumer benefits to be provided to enrollees and/or
potential enrollees in the high risk pool:
(A) Low income premium subsidies;
(B) Reduction in premium trends, actual premium or other cost-
sharing requirements;
(C) An expansion or broadening of the pool of individuals eligible
for coverage, such as through eliminating waiting lists, increasing
enrollment caps, or providing flexibility in enrollment;
(D) Less stringent rules, or additional waiver authority with
respect to coverage of pre-existing conditions;
(E) Increased benefits; and
(F) The establishment of disease management programs.
(ii) A description of the population or subset population that will
be eligible for the supplemental consumer benefits.
(iii) A projected budget for the use of bonus grant funds using the
SF 424 A.
* * * * *
(b) Standard form application kit--(1) Forms. (i) The following
standard forms must be completed with an original signature and
enclosed as part of the application package:
SF-424 Application for Federal Assistance.
SF-424A Budget Information.
SF-424B Assurances Non-Construction Programs.
SF-LLL Disclosure of Lobbying Activities Biographical Sketch.
(ii) These forms can be accessed from the following Web site:
https://www.grants.gov.
(2) Other narrative. All other narrative in the application must be
submitted on 8\1/2\ x 11 inches white paper.
(c) Application submission. Submission of application package is
through https://www.grants.gov. Submissions by facsimile (fax)
transmissions will not be accepted.
(d) Application deadlines. (1) The deadline for States to submit an
application for losses incurred in a State fiscal year is June 30 of
the next Federal fiscal year that begins after the end of the State
fiscal year. Funding for FY 2008, FY 2009, and FY 2010 under the
Extension Act requires the subsequent enactment of appropriations
authority. Funding was appropriated for Federal FY 2006. States will be
unable to apply for FY 2008 through FY 2010 grants unless and until
such funding becomes available.
(2) Deadline for States to submit an application for losses
incurred in their fiscal year 2005. States had to submit an application
to CMS no later than June 30, 2006.
(3) Deadline for States to submit an application for losses
incurred in their fiscal year 2006. States must submit an application
to CMS by no later than June 30, 2007.
(4) Deadline for States to submit an application for losses
incurred in their fiscal year 2007. States must submit an application
to CMS by no later than June 30, 2008.
(5) Deadline for States to submit an application for losses
incurred in their fiscal year 2008. States must submit an application
to CMS by no later than June 30, 2009.
(6) Deadline for States to submit an application for losses
incurred in their fiscal year 2009. States must submit an application
to CMS by no later than June 30, 2010.
(e) Where to submit an application. Applications must be submitted
to https://www.grants.gov. Submissions by facsimile (fax) transmissions
will not be accepted.
0
8. Section 148.318 is amended by revising paragraph (d)(2) to read as
follows:
Sec. 148.318 Grant application review.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(2) Funding mechanism. The State has outlined funding sources, such
as assessments and State general revenues, which can cover the
projected costs and are reasonably designed to ensure continued funding
of losses a State incurs in connection with the operation of the
qualified high risk pool after each fiscal year for which it is
applying for grant funds.
0
9. Section 148.320 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(2)(iii) to read
as follows:
Sec. 148.320 Grant awards.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) The grantee will be required to submit quarterly progress and
financial
[[Page 22287]]
reports under part 92 of this title and in accordance with section
2745(f) of the Public Health Service Act, requiring the Secretary to
make an annual report to Congress that includes information on the use
of these grant funds by States.
* * * * *
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.778, Medical
Assistance Program)
Dated: January 17, 2008.
Kerry Weems,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Approved: January 17, 2008.
Michael O. Leavitt,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-9066 Filed 4-24-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P