Notice of Availability of Revised NEPA Handbook, 22162-22164 [E8-8866]
Download as PDF
22162
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 80 / Thursday, April 24, 2008 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Natural Resources, Michigan Attorney
General, and the Saginaw Chippewa
Indian Tribe of Michigan, to assess
injuries to natural resources resulting
from the releases of hazardous
substances at and from Dow Chemical
Company’s (Dow) plant on the
Tittabawasee River in Midland County,
Michigan.
The Trustees, pursuant to section
107(f) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation
and Liability Act (CERCLA), as
amended (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.) and
other applicable Federal, State and
tribal laws, may act on behalf of the
public to pursue natural resource
damages for injury to, destruction of, or
loss of natural resources resulting from
the release of hazardous substances to
the environment. Under CERCLA, sums
recovered by trustees as damages shall
be used to restore, rehabilitate, replace,
or acquire the equivalent of such natural
resources.
In November 2006, the Trustees
issued a preassessment screen and
determination for the Tittabawassee
River System Assessment Area in
accordance with the Federal regulations
for NRDAs (43 CFR part 11). The
preassessment screen documents the
Trustees’ determination that conditions
warrant a NRDA. The next step is the
issuance of an Assessment Plan. The
Assessment Plan developed by the
Trustees is intended to describe how the
Trustees will assess injuries to natural
resources resulting from releases of
hazardous substances at and from the
Dow plant property. The Assessment
Plan describes the proposed approach
for determining and quantifying natural
resource injuries and calculations
damages associated with these injuries.
By developing an Assessment Plan, the
Trustees can ensure that the NRDA will
be completed at a reasonable cost. The
Trustees intend to conduct elements of
the assessment cooperatively with Dow.
The Trustees have entered into a
funding and participation agreement
with Dow that is available on the FWS
Web site listed above. The agreement
specifies how parts of the NRDA can be
conducted cooperatively with Dow. The
Trustees envision an assessment based
on a combination of Dow-implemented
cooperative work, Trustee-implemented
cooperative work, and (as needed to
accomplish Trustee goals) independent
Trustee work.
Obtaining a Review Copy
The Assessment Plan is available for
review by appointment during normal
business hours from the following
officials at their office locations:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Apr 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
(1) East Lansing, MI: Lisa Williams,
East Lansing Field Office, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 2651 Coolidge Road,
Suite 101, East Lansing, MI 48823;
phone: (517) 351–8324.
(2) Washington, DC: Al Sedik, Bureau
of Indian Affairs, Division of
Environmental and Cultural Resources
Management, 1849 C Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20240; phone: (202)
208–5474.
(3) Mt. Pleasant, MI: Sally Kniffen,
Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe, 7070
E. Broadway, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858;
phone: (989) 775–4015.
The Assessment Plan is also available
for review on the Internet at https://
www.fws.gov/midwest/
TittabawasseeRiverNRDA/.
Public Comment Availability
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal indentifying information in
your comment, be advised that your
entire comment—including your
personal indentifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold from public review your
personal identifying information, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: April 8, 2008.
Chris Jensen,
Acting Regional Director, Region 3, Fort
Snelling, Minnesota.
[FR Doc. E8–8959 Filed 4–23–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[WO–210–08–1610–PN]
Notice of Availability of Revised NEPA
Handbook
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
availability of the Bureau of Land
Management’s (BLM) Handbook to
support implementation of the
procedures the BLM uses to comply
with the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA).
DATES: You may submit written
comments on the NEPA Handbook
within 90 days following the date this
Notice of Availability is published in
the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• E-mail: NEPA@blm.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Mail: U.S. Department of the
Interior, Director (210), Bureau of Land
Management, Mail Stop 850 LS, 1849 C
St., NW., Attention: AD200,
Washington, DC 20240.
• Personal or messenger delivery:
1620 L Street, NW., Room 850,
Washington, DC 20036.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peg
Sorensen, Senior Planning and
Environmental Analyst—NEPA, 202–
557–3564, peg_sorensen@blm.gov.
Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
to contact the above individuals during
business hours. The FIRS is available
twenty-four hours a day, seven days a
week, to leave a message or question
with the above individuals. You will
receive a reply during normal business
hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice announces the availability of the
revised BLM NEPA Handbook for use by
BLM personnel in the field. The
handbook provides supplemental
information, guidance, and examples to
assure consistency with the Department
of the Interior’s Departmental Manual
(DOI DM) and the Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ) NEPA
regulations. The BLM NEPA Handbook
(H–1790–1) was last updated October
25, 1988 and revisions are necessary to
update the information and to reflect
current NEPA guidance. The public can
review the revised edition of the NEPA
Handbook on the BLM Web site at
https://www.blm.gov, on the left click on
Information and then click on NEPA.
Note that the Web Guide links will be
functional at a later date. The handbook
will be mailed to those who indicate
that they want a hard copy or compact
disk. The handbook is based upon
current regulation, policy, and
procedures.
The handbook revisions focus on
helping the BLM improve analysis to
support decision making. The revisions
to the NEPA Handbook are also
designed to make the NEPA process
more efficient, avoiding redundant or
unnecessary documentation. The
revisions include updates to clarify
definitions and incorporate new
Departmental requirements.
Written Comments
The public is welcome to review and
comment on the handbook. Today’s
publication is a notice of internal BLM
guidance and not a rulemaking.
Therefore, no formal comment period
will occur resulting in no obligation for
the BLM to respond or address
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 80 / Thursday, April 24, 2008 / Notices
comments from the public. If you
choose to submit comments, please
limit such comments to issues pertinent
to the handbook itself and explain the
reasons for any recommended changes.
Where possible, reference the specific
section or paragraph of the handbook
which you are addressing.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment, including your
personal identifying information, may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Procedural Requirements: Although
the NEPA Handbook is not a
rulemaking, we have addressed the
various procedural requirements that
are generally applicable to proposed and
final rulemaking to contribute to this
open review process.
Regulatory Planning and Review
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993) it has been
determined that this action is the
implementation of policy and
procedures applicable only to the BLM
and not a significant regulatory action.
These policies and procedures would
not impose a compliance burden on the
general economy.
Administrative Procedure Act
The NEPA Handbook is not subject to
prior notice and opportunity to
comment under the Administrative
Procedures Act because it provides
internal guidance to BLM personnel [5
U.S.C. 553(b)(A)]. In addition, the
Handbook does not establish agency
procedures for implementing the NEPA,
and therefore does not require review by
the CEQ or public notice and the
opportunity to comment under the CEQ
regulations [40 CFR 1507.3(a)].
However, the Department of the
Interior’s (DOI) Office of Environmental
Policy and Compliance has reviewed
the Handbook, and the BLM has elected
to invite public comment as well.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This document is not subject to notice
and comment under the Administrative
Procedures Act, and, therefore, is not
subject to the analytical requirements of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601 et seq.). This document provides the
BLM with instruction and information
under the NEPA and does not compel
any other party to conduct any action.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Apr 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This handbook does not comprise a
major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act. The document will not
have an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more and is expected
to have no significant economic
impacts. Further, it will not cause a
major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries,
Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions and will
[[Page 52596]] impose no additional
regulatory restraints in addition to those
already in operation. Finally, the
document does not have significant
adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or the ability of United
States based enterprises to compete with
foreign based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
In accordance with the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501, et
seq.), this document will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. A Small Government
Agency Plan is not required. The
document does not require any
additional management responsibilities.
Further, this document will not produce
a Federal mandate of $100 million or
greater in any year, that is, it is not a
significant regulatory action under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act. These
policies and procedures are not
expected to have significant economic
impacts nor will they impose any
unfunded mandates on other Federal,
State, or local government agencies to
carry out specific activities.
Federalism
In accordance with Executive Order
13132, this document does not have
significant Federalism effects; and,
therefore, a Federalism assessment is
not required. The policies and
procedures will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the Federal
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. No intrusion on
State policy or administration is
expected, roles or responsibilities of
Federal or State governments will not
change, and fiscal capacity will not be
substantially, directly affected.
Therefore, the document does not have
significant effects or implications on
Federalism.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22163
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document does not require
information collection as defined under
the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Therefore, this document does not
constitute a new information collection
system requiring Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).
National Environmental Policy Act
The CEQ regulations do not direct
agencies to prepare a NEPA analysis or
document before establishing agency
procedures that supplement the CEQ
regulations for implementing the NEPA.
The requirements for establishing
agency NEPA procedures are set forth at
40 CFR 1505.1 and 1507.3. As explained
above, however, this Handbook does not
establish procedures for implementing
the NEPA but provides supplemental
information, guidance, and examples for
the use of BLM personnel in the field.
Therefore, no NEPA analysis, or
preparation of analytical documents
pursuant to the NEPA is required to
support its publication. To the extent
any documentation of compliance with
the NEPA or the CEQ regulations may
be required; the DOI’s Department
Categorical exclusion 1.10 is applicable.
See DOI DM 2 (Appendix 1).
Essential Fish Habitat
We have analyzed this document in
accordance with section 305(b) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act and
determined that issuance of this
document will not affect the essential
fish habitat of federally managed
species; and, therefore, an essential fish
habitat consultation on this document is
not required.
Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
In accordance with Executive Order
13175 of November 6, 2000, and 512
DM 2, we have assessed this handbook’s
impact on tribal trust resources and
have determined that it does not
directly affect tribal resources since it
supports implementation of the BLM’s
procedures for its compliance with the
NEPA.
Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
Executive Order 13211 of May 18,
2001, requires a Statement of Energy
Effects for significant energy actions.
Significant energy actions are actions
normally published in the Federal
Register that lead to the promulgation of
a final rule or regulation and may have
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
22164
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 80 / Thursday, April 24, 2008 / Notices
any adverse effects on energy supply,
distribution, or use. We have explained
above that this document is an internal
BLM action which only affects how the
BLM conducts its business under the
NEPA. This handbook is not a
rulemaking; and therefore, not subject to
Executive Order 13211.
Actions To Expedite Energy-Related
Projects
Executive Order 13212 of May 18,
2001, requires agencies to expedite
energy-related projects by streamlining
internal processes while maintaining
safety, public health, and environmental
protections. Today’s publication is in
conformance with this requirement as it
promotes existing process streamlining
requirements and revises the text to
emphasize this concept.
Government Actions and Interference
With Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights
In accordance with Executive Order
12630 (March 15, 1988) and Part 318 of
the Departmental Manual, the BLM has
reviewed today’s notice to determine
whether it would interfere with
constitutionally protected property
rights. Again, we believe that as internal
instructions to the BLM on
implementation of the NEPA, this
publication would not cause such
interference.
James Caswell,
Director, Bureau of Land Management.
[FR Doc. E8–8866 Filed 4–23–08; 8:45 am]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
BILLING CODE 4310–84–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Southern Delivery System, FryingpanArkansas Project, Colorado
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice for the extension of the
public comment period and the
announcement of a public listening
session for the Southern Delivery
System Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (DEIS).
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Reclamation is announcing an
extension of the public comment period
for the Southern Delivery System DEIS.
The original comment period published
in the Federal Register (73 FR 11144)
was scheduled to end on April 26, 2008.
We are now notifying the public that
Reclamation is extending the comment
period to June 13, 2008.
Reclamation is also announcing a
public listening session that will be held
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Apr 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
in Pueblo, Colorado on May 29, 2008.
We are hosting this meeting to provide
an additional opportunity for the
interested public to provide comments
on the DEIS. Reclamation will not be
responding to comments or answering
questions publically at this meeting.
The intent of this meeting is to listen to
and record comments made by the
public. All comments received on the
DEIS will have corresponding responses
published in the Final Environmental
Impact Statement.
DATES: The public listening session will
be held on May 29, 2008 from 6 p.m. to
8 p.m. at the location shown in the
ADDRESSES section below. All comments
on the DEIS must be received by
Reclamation on or before June 13, 2008
at one of the addresses provided below.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the
DEIS can be sent to: Southern Delivery
System EIS, Attention: Ms. Kara Lamb,
Bureau of Reclamation, Eastern
Colorado Area Office, 11056 W. County
Road 18E, Loveland, CO 80537–9711.
Comments may also be submitted via
facsimile at (970) 663–3212 (attention:
Ms. Kara Lamb; Southern Delivery
System EIS) or e-mail to:
klamb@gp.usbr.gov.
The public listening session on May
29, 2008 will be held at the Sangre de
Cristo Arts and Conference Center, 210
North Santa Fe Avenue, Pueblo, CO
81003.
For
copies of the DEIS or the technical
reports, please send written requests to
Ms. Kara Lamb via the postal or e-mail
address provided above. The full reports
and documents are also available on the
project Web site at: https://
www.sdeis.com. For additional
information please contact Ms. Kara
Lamb at (970) 962–4326.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Reclamation staff will hear from
interested members of the public in a
formal public hearing forum. Statements
will be limited to a maximum of 3
minutes per commenter. For those
people wanting to speak at the listening
session advance registration is required
and is available from 5:30 p.m. to 6 p.m.
There will be a third-party moderator to
facilitate the process and a court
reporter to document the comments.
Copies of the DEIS are available for
public inspection and review at the
following locations:
• Bureau of Reclamation, Eastern
Colorado Area Office, 11056 W. County
Road 18E, Loveland, CO 80537.
• Buena Vista/North Chaffee County
Library, 131 Linderman Ave., Buena
Vista, CO 81211.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Canyon City Public Library, 516
Macon Ave., Canyon City, CO 81212.
• Pikes Peak Library District—
Penrose Library, 20 N. Cascade Ave.,
Colorado Springs, CO 80903.
• Pueblo City-County Library District,
100 E. Abriendo Ave., Pueblo, CO
81004.
• Woodruff Memorial Library, 522
Colorado Ave., La Junta, CO 81050.
Public Disclosure Statement: Before
including your name, address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: April 18, 2008.
Donald E. Moomaw,
Deputy Regional Director, Great Plains
Region.
[FR Doc. E8–8916 Filed 4–23–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
Under the Clean Water Act
Notice is hereby given that on April
7, 2008, a proposed Consent Decree
(‘‘Consent Decree’’) in the matter of
United States v. ConocoPhillips
Company, Civil Action No. 2–08CV–
077–J, was lodged with the United
States District Court for the Northern
District of Texas.
In the complaint in this matter, the
United States sought injunctive relief
and penalties against ConocoPhillips
Company (‘‘ConocoPhillips’’) for claims
arising under the Clean Water Act, 33
U.S.C. 1251 et seq., in connection with
discharges of pollutants from the
petroleum refinery ConocoPhillips
operates in Borger, Texas. Under the
Consent Decree, ConocoPhillips will
pay a civil penalty of $1,200,000.00,
perform a Supplemental Environmental
Project to reduce the amount of solids
discharged into nearby waters during
storm events, monitor surrounding
waters for selenium levels, and maintain
the controls it has already put into place
to minimize selenium discharges and
correct whole effluent toxicity
violations. The Department of Justice
will receive for a period of thirty (30)
days from the date of this publication
comments relating to the Consent
Decree. Comments should be addressed
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 80 (Thursday, April 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22162-22164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-8866]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[WO-210-08-1610-PN]
Notice of Availability of Revised NEPA Handbook
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of the Bureau of Land
Management's (BLM) Handbook to support implementation of the procedures
the BLM uses to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA).
DATES: You may submit written comments on the NEPA Handbook within 90
days following the date this Notice of Availability is published in the
Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
E-mail: NEPA@blm.gov.
Mail: U.S. Department of the Interior, Director (210),
Bureau of Land Management, Mail Stop 850 LS, 1849 C St., NW.,
Attention: AD200, Washington, DC 20240.
Personal or messenger delivery: 1620 L Street, NW., Room
850, Washington, DC 20036.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peg Sorensen, Senior Planning and
Environmental Analyst--NEPA, 202-557-3564, peg_sorensen@blm.gov.
Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may
call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to
contact the above individuals during business hours. The FIRS is
available twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, to leave a
message or question with the above individuals. You will receive a
reply during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice announces the availability of
the revised BLM NEPA Handbook for use by BLM personnel in the field.
The handbook provides supplemental information, guidance, and examples
to assure consistency with the Department of the Interior's
Departmental Manual (DOI DM) and the Council on Environmental Quality
(CEQ) NEPA regulations. The BLM NEPA Handbook (H-1790-1) was last
updated October 25, 1988 and revisions are necessary to update the
information and to reflect current NEPA guidance. The public can review
the revised edition of the NEPA Handbook on the BLM Web site at https://
www.blm.gov, on the left click on Information and then click on NEPA.
Note that the Web Guide links will be functional at a later date. The
handbook will be mailed to those who indicate that they want a hard
copy or compact disk. The handbook is based upon current regulation,
policy, and procedures.
The handbook revisions focus on helping the BLM improve analysis to
support decision making. The revisions to the NEPA Handbook are also
designed to make the NEPA process more efficient, avoiding redundant or
unnecessary documentation. The revisions include updates to clarify
definitions and incorporate new Departmental requirements.
Written Comments
The public is welcome to review and comment on the handbook.
Today's publication is a notice of internal BLM guidance and not a
rulemaking. Therefore, no formal comment period will occur resulting in
no obligation for the BLM to respond or address
[[Page 22163]]
comments from the public. If you choose to submit comments, please
limit such comments to issues pertinent to the handbook itself and
explain the reasons for any recommended changes. Where possible,
reference the specific section or paragraph of the handbook which you
are addressing.
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment, including your personal identifying
information, may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Procedural Requirements: Although the NEPA Handbook is not a
rulemaking, we have addressed the various procedural requirements that
are generally applicable to proposed and final rulemaking to contribute
to this open review process.
Regulatory Planning and Review
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) it has
been determined that this action is the implementation of policy and
procedures applicable only to the BLM and not a significant regulatory
action. These policies and procedures would not impose a compliance
burden on the general economy.
Administrative Procedure Act
The NEPA Handbook is not subject to prior notice and opportunity to
comment under the Administrative Procedures Act because it provides
internal guidance to BLM personnel [5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A)]. In addition,
the Handbook does not establish agency procedures for implementing the
NEPA, and therefore does not require review by the CEQ or public notice
and the opportunity to comment under the CEQ regulations [40 CFR
1507.3(a)]. However, the Department of the Interior's (DOI) Office of
Environmental Policy and Compliance has reviewed the Handbook, and the
BLM has elected to invite public comment as well.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This document is not subject to notice and comment under the
Administrative Procedures Act, and, therefore, is not subject to the
analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.). This document provides the BLM with instruction and
information under the NEPA and does not compel any other party to
conduct any action.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This handbook does not comprise a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2),
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. The document
will not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more
and is expected to have no significant economic impacts. Further, it
will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or
geographic regions and will [[Page 52596]] impose no additional
regulatory restraints in addition to those already in operation.
Finally, the document does not have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of United States based enterprises to compete with foreign
based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
In accordance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501,
et seq.), this document will not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. A Small Government Agency Plan is not required. The
document does not require any additional management responsibilities.
Further, this document will not produce a Federal mandate of $100
million or greater in any year, that is, it is not a significant
regulatory action under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act. These
policies and procedures are not expected to have significant economic
impacts nor will they impose any unfunded mandates on other Federal,
State, or local government agencies to carry out specific activities.
Federalism
In accordance with Executive Order 13132, this document does not
have significant Federalism effects; and, therefore, a Federalism
assessment is not required. The policies and procedures will not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the Federal government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. No
intrusion on State policy or administration is expected, roles or
responsibilities of Federal or State governments will not change, and
fiscal capacity will not be substantially, directly affected.
Therefore, the document does not have significant effects or
implications on Federalism.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document does not require information collection as defined
under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Therefore, this document does not
constitute a new information collection system requiring Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
National Environmental Policy Act
The CEQ regulations do not direct agencies to prepare a NEPA
analysis or document before establishing agency procedures that
supplement the CEQ regulations for implementing the NEPA. The
requirements for establishing agency NEPA procedures are set forth at
40 CFR 1505.1 and 1507.3. As explained above, however, this Handbook
does not establish procedures for implementing the NEPA but provides
supplemental information, guidance, and examples for the use of BLM
personnel in the field. Therefore, no NEPA analysis, or preparation of
analytical documents pursuant to the NEPA is required to support its
publication. To the extent any documentation of compliance with the
NEPA or the CEQ regulations may be required; the DOI's Department
Categorical exclusion 1.10 is applicable. See DOI DM 2 (Appendix 1).
Essential Fish Habitat
We have analyzed this document in accordance with section 305(b) of
the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and
determined that issuance of this document will not affect the essential
fish habitat of federally managed species; and, therefore, an essential
fish habitat consultation on this document is not required.
Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
In accordance with Executive Order 13175 of November 6, 2000, and
512 DM 2, we have assessed this handbook's impact on tribal trust
resources and have determined that it does not directly affect tribal
resources since it supports implementation of the BLM's procedures for
its compliance with the NEPA.
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
Executive Order 13211 of May 18, 2001, requires a Statement of
Energy Effects for significant energy actions. Significant energy
actions are actions normally published in the Federal Register that
lead to the promulgation of a final rule or regulation and may have
[[Page 22164]]
any adverse effects on energy supply, distribution, or use. We have
explained above that this document is an internal BLM action which only
affects how the BLM conducts its business under the NEPA. This handbook
is not a rulemaking; and therefore, not subject to Executive Order
13211.
Actions To Expedite Energy-Related Projects
Executive Order 13212 of May 18, 2001, requires agencies to
expedite energy-related projects by streamlining internal processes
while maintaining safety, public health, and environmental protections.
Today's publication is in conformance with this requirement as it
promotes existing process streamlining requirements and revises the
text to emphasize this concept.
Government Actions and Interference With Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights
In accordance with Executive Order 12630 (March 15, 1988) and Part
318 of the Departmental Manual, the BLM has reviewed today's notice to
determine whether it would interfere with constitutionally protected
property rights. Again, we believe that as internal instructions to the
BLM on implementation of the NEPA, this publication would not cause
such interference.
James Caswell,
Director, Bureau of Land Management.
[FR Doc. E8-8866 Filed 4-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-84-P