Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 767 Airplanes, 21235-21237 [E8-8317]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 77 / Monday, April 21, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Fokker Model F.28
Mark 0070 and Mark 0100 airplanes,
certificated in any category, all serial
numbers, except those previously modified
in accordance with Fokker Service Bulletin
SBF100–30–022.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 30: Ice and Rain Protection.
Reason
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
In 1997, Fokker introduced a new type of
Peri-seal (SBF100–30–022). The old type was
known to be subject to deterioration, which,
in combination with improper installation,
can cause leakage of hot wing anti-icing air
from the Peri-seal housing. This results in an
uncontrolled flow of high-pressure hot air to
enter the forward (anti-icing) plenum
chamber of the wing leading edge, potentially
damaging the anti-icing barrier webs.
Subsequently, the wing auxiliary spar can
also be damaged by high-pressure hot air.
Analysis at the time showed that any
resulting damage (known to occur at inboard
positions only) would not affect the wing
load capability. For this reason, the
modification was not classified as
MANDATORY and no AD action was
warranted. However, through a recent
occurrence, it was discovered that
deterioration of the Peri-seals enables the
piccolo tubes to vibrate, resulting in a broken
piccolo tube. In this case, the location of the
failure was more outboard than previous
occurrences. This condition, if not corrected,
may cause heat damage to the front spar that
potentially affects the wing’s load capability.
Since an unsafe condition was identified,
likely to exist or develop on an aircraft of this
type design, CAA (Civil Aviation Authority)
Netherlands issued AD NL–2006–011 to
require inspection of the Piccolo Tubes and
the surrounding structure to establish correct
installation, as well as the replacement of the
460-series Peri-seals by the improved 600series, which have a higher temperature
limit.
Since the issuance of that AD, Fokker has
developed a modification, published as
Component Service Bulletin (CSB) D14000–
57–007, for spare wing leading edge sections
that may still contain the 460-series Periseals. For that reason, this EASA AD retains
the requirements of AD NL–2006–011 and
adds a limit for the allowed use of
unmodified wing leading edge section as
replacement part.
The corrective actions include inspection
of the piccolo tubes and the wing leading
edge for damage, and replacement of the Periseals, or repair of damage, as applicable.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following
actions.
(1) Within 4,000 flight hours or 12 months
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first, do the actions in paragraphs
(f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii) of this AD in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:19 Apr 18, 2008
Jkt 214001
Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–30–028,
Revision 1, dated April 17, 2007.
(i) Inspect for damage of the piccolo tubes
and the wing leading edge on the outside and
on the inside at the access panels. If any
damage is found that is beyond the limits
specified in the service bulletin, repair before
further flight.
(ii) Replace the 460-series Peri-seals in the
riblets with improved 600-series Peri-seals.
(2) As of 12 months after the effective date
of this AD, no person may install on any
airplane a spare wing leading edge section
unless the leading edge section has been
modified in accordance with Fokker
Component Service Bulletin D14000–57–007,
dated April 17, 2007.
(3) Actions done before the effective date
of this AD in accordance with Fokker Service
Bulletin SBF100–30–028, dated May 18,
2006, are considered acceptable for
compliance with the actions required by
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/
or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
Related Information
(h) Refer to European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) Airworthiness Directive
2007–0229, dated August 15, 2007; Fokker
Service Bulletin SBF100–30–028, Revision 1,
dated April 17, 2007; and Fokker Component
Service Bulletin D14000–57–007, dated April
17, 2007; for related information.
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Fokker Service Bulletin
SBF100–30–028, Revision 1, dated April 17,
2007, to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Fokker Services B.V.,
Technical Services Dept., P.O. Box 231, 2150
AE Nieuw-Vennep, the Netherlands.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
(202) 741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 8,
2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–8256 Filed 4–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Tom Rodriguez,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the
FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer or other source,
use these actions if they are FAA-approved.
Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State
of Design Authority (or their delegated
agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act,
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
PO 00000
21235
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–29063; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–049–AD; Amendment
39–15480; AD 2008–08–26]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 767 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Boeing Model 767 airplanes. This AD
requires a one-time inspection to
determine the material of the forward
and aft gray water drain masts. For
airplanes having composite gray water
drain masts, this AD also requires
installation of a ground bracket and a
bonding jumper between a ground
bracket and the clamp on the tube of the
forward and aft gray water composite
drain masts. This AD results from a
report of charred insulation blankets
and burned wires around the forward
gray water composite drain mast found
during an inspection of the forward
cargo compartment. We are issuing this
AD to prevent a fire near a composite
drain mast and possible disruption of
the electrical power system caused by a
lightning strike on a composite drain
E:\FR\FM\21APR1.SGM
21APR1
21236
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 77 / Monday, April 21, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
mast, which could result in the loss of
several functions essential for safe
flight.
This AD is effective May 27,
2008.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of May 27, 2008.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207.
DATES:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone 800–647–5527)
is the Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicholas Wilson, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental
Systems Branch, ANM–150S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6476; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that would apply to all
Boeing Model 767 airplanes. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on August 31, 2007 (72 FR
50276). That NPRM proposed to require
a one-time inspection to determine the
material of the forward and aft gray
water drain masts. For airplanes having
composite gray water drain masts, that
NPRM also proposed to require
installation of a ground bracket and a
bonding jumper between a ground
bracket and the clamp on the tube of the
forward and aft gray water composite
drain masts.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
considered the comments received from
the single commenter.
Request To Remove Airplanes From the
Applicability Statement of the Proposed
AD
Boeing requests that we revise the
applicability statement of the NPRM to
remove certain airplanes. Boeing states
that Model 767 airplanes beginning with
line number 934 have a ground bracket
and bonding jumper installed in
production for both the forward and the
aft composite gray water drain masts.
Therefore, Boeing asserts that these
airplanes should not be subject to this
AD.
We partially agree. For the reason
stated by Boeing, we have determined
that these airplanes should not be
subject to this AD. However, we do not
agree to revise the Applicability
statement of this AD as suggested by
Boeing. Instead, we have revised the
Applicability statement of this final rule
to state, ‘‘This AD applies to Boeing
Model 767–200, –300, –300F, and
–400ER series airplanes, certificated in
any category; as identified in Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 767–
30–0047, dated January 25, 2007; and
Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 767–30–0048, dated January 25,
2007.’’ We have confirmed that the
effectivities of these service bulletins
match the applicability suggested by
Boeing.
Explanation of Changes Made to This
AD
We have confirmed with the airplane
manufacturer that the composite and
aluminum drain mast can be
interchangeable. Therefore, we have
added a new paragraph (h), ‘‘Parts
Installation,’’ to this final rule to
prohibit installation of a composite gray
water drain mast, unless a new ground
bracket and bonding jumper are also
installed, as specified in paragraph (g) of
this AD. We have also re-identified
subsequent paragraphs accordingly.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
with the changes described previously.
We also determined that these changes
will not increase the economic burden
on any operator or increase the scope of
the AD.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 86 airplanes of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet.
The following table provides the
estimated costs for U.S. operators to
comply with this AD.
ESTIMATED COSTS
Work
hours
Action
Inspection to determine gray water
drain mast material.
Installation of bonding
jumper.
Average labor
rate per hour
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
Number of U.S.-registered airplanes
Fleet cost
$80
None ........................
$80 ..........................
41 ............................
$3,280.
4
80
Up to $654 ..............
Up to $974 ..............
Up to 41 ..................
Up to $39,934.
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
15:19 Apr 18, 2008
Cost per airplane
1
Authority for This Rulemaking
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Parts
Jkt 214001
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
E:\FR\FM\21APR1.SGM
21APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 77 / Monday, April 21, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory
evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
I
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
I
2008–08–26 Boeing: Amendment 39–15480.
Docket No. FAA–2007–29063;
Directorate Identifier 2007–NM–049–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is
effective May 27, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 767–
200, –300, –300F, and –400ER series
airplanes, certificated in any category; as
identified in Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 767–30–0047, dated January
25, 2007; and Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 767–30–0048, dated January
25, 2007.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report of charred
insulation blankets and burned wires around
the forward gray water composite drain mast
found during an inspection of the forward
cargo compartment. We are issuing this AD
to prevent a fire near a composite drain mast
and possible disruption of the electrical
power system caused by a lightning strike on
a composite drain mast, which could result
in the loss of several functions essential for
safe flight.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:19 Apr 18, 2008
Jkt 214001
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspection To Determine Material of Gray
Water Drain Mast
(f) Within 60 months after the effective
date of this AD, inspect the forward and aft
gray water drain masts to determine whether
the drain mast is made of aluminum or
composite. A review of airplane maintenance
records is acceptable in lieu of this
inspection if the material of the forward and
aft gray water drain masts can be
conclusively determined from that review.
(1) For any aluminum gray water drain
mast identified during the inspection or
records check required by paragraph (f) of
this AD, no further action is required by this
AD for that drain mast only.
(2) For any composite gray water drain
mast identified during the inspection or
records check required by paragraph (f) of
this AD, do the actions specified in
paragraph (g) of this AD.
Installation of New Ground Bracket and
Bonding Jumper
(g) For any composite gray water drain
mast identified during the inspection or
records check required by paragraph (f) of
this AD: Within 60 months after the effective
date of this AD, install a bonding jumper
between the new ground bracket and the
clamp on the tube of the gray water
composite drain mast, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 767–30–
0047, dated January 25, 2007 (for Model 767–
200, –300, and –300F series airplanes); and
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
767–30–0048, dated January 25, 2007 (for
Model 767–400ER series airplanes).
Parts Installation
(h) As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install, on any airplane, a
composite gray water drain mast, unless a
new ground bracket and bonding jumper are
also installed, as specified in paragraph (g) of
this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(i)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(j) You must use Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 767–30–0047, dated January
25, 2007; or Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 767–30–0048, dated January 25,
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21237
2007; as applicable; to do the actions
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124–2207.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information incorporated by reference at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 7,
2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–8317 Filed 4–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–29029; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–175–AD; Amendment
39–15477; AD 2008–08–23]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 737–200C Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Boeing Model 737–200C series
airplanes. This AD requires revising the
FAA-approved maintenance inspection
program to include inspections that will
give no less than the required damage
tolerance rating for each structural
significant item (SSI), doing repetitive
inspections to detect cracks of all SSIs,
and repairing cracked structure. This
AD results from a report of incidents
involving fatigue cracking in transport
category airplanes that are approaching
or have exceeded their design service
objective. We are issuing this AD to
maintain the continued structural
integrity of the entire fleet of Model
737–200C series airplanes.
DATES: This AD is effective May 27,
2008.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
E:\FR\FM\21APR1.SGM
21APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 77 (Monday, April 21, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21235-21237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-8317]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-29063; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-049-AD;
Amendment 39-15480; AD 2008-08-26]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 767 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Boeing Model 767 airplanes. This AD requires a one-time inspection to
determine the material of the forward and aft gray water drain masts.
For airplanes having composite gray water drain masts, this AD also
requires installation of a ground bracket and a bonding jumper between
a ground bracket and the clamp on the tube of the forward and aft gray
water composite drain masts. This AD results from a report of charred
insulation blankets and burned wires around the forward gray water
composite drain mast found during an inspection of the forward cargo
compartment. We are issuing this AD to prevent a fire near a composite
drain mast and possible disruption of the electrical power system
caused by a lightning strike on a composite drain
[[Page 21236]]
mast, which could result in the loss of several functions essential for
safe flight.
DATES: This AD is effective May 27, 2008.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of May 27, 2008.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-
2207.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is the Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicholas Wilson, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6476; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to
all Boeing Model 767 airplanes. That NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on August 31, 2007 (72 FR 50276). That NPRM proposed to
require a one-time inspection to determine the material of the forward
and aft gray water drain masts. For airplanes having composite gray
water drain masts, that NPRM also proposed to require installation of a
ground bracket and a bonding jumper between a ground bracket and the
clamp on the tube of the forward and aft gray water composite drain
masts.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received from the single commenter.
Request To Remove Airplanes From the Applicability Statement of the
Proposed AD
Boeing requests that we revise the applicability statement of the
NPRM to remove certain airplanes. Boeing states that Model 767
airplanes beginning with line number 934 have a ground bracket and
bonding jumper installed in production for both the forward and the aft
composite gray water drain masts. Therefore, Boeing asserts that these
airplanes should not be subject to this AD.
We partially agree. For the reason stated by Boeing, we have
determined that these airplanes should not be subject to this AD.
However, we do not agree to revise the Applicability statement of this
AD as suggested by Boeing. Instead, we have revised the Applicability
statement of this final rule to state, ``This AD applies to Boeing
Model 767-200, -300, -300F, and -400ER series airplanes, certificated
in any category; as identified in Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 767-30-0047, dated January 25, 2007; and Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 767-30-0048, dated January 25, 2007.'' We
have confirmed that the effectivities of these service bulletins match
the applicability suggested by Boeing.
Explanation of Changes Made to This AD
We have confirmed with the airplane manufacturer that the composite
and aluminum drain mast can be interchangeable. Therefore, we have
added a new paragraph (h), ``Parts Installation,'' to this final rule
to prohibit installation of a composite gray water drain mast, unless a
new ground bracket and bonding jumper are also installed, as specified
in paragraph (g) of this AD. We have also re-identified subsequent
paragraphs accordingly.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the
AD with the changes described previously. We also determined that these
changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 86 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The following table provides the estimated costs for
U.S. operators to comply with this AD.
Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Work Average labor Number of U.S.-
Action hours rate per hour Parts Cost per airplane registered airplanes Fleet cost
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection to determine gray water 1 $80 None................. $80.................. 41................... $3,280.
drain mast material.
Installation of bonding jumper.... 4 80 Up to $654........... Up to $974........... Up to 41............. Up to $39,934.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
[[Page 21237]]
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2008-08-26 Boeing: Amendment 39-15480. Docket No. FAA-2007-29063;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-049-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective May 27, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 767-200, -300, -300F, and -
400ER series airplanes, certificated in any category; as identified
in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 767-30-0047, dated
January 25, 2007; and Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 767-
30-0048, dated January 25, 2007.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report of charred insulation blankets
and burned wires around the forward gray water composite drain mast
found during an inspection of the forward cargo compartment. We are
issuing this AD to prevent a fire near a composite drain mast and
possible disruption of the electrical power system caused by a
lightning strike on a composite drain mast, which could result in
the loss of several functions essential for safe flight.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspection To Determine Material of Gray Water Drain Mast
(f) Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD,
inspect the forward and aft gray water drain masts to determine
whether the drain mast is made of aluminum or composite. A review of
airplane maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of this
inspection if the material of the forward and aft gray water drain
masts can be conclusively determined from that review.
(1) For any aluminum gray water drain mast identified during the
inspection or records check required by paragraph (f) of this AD, no
further action is required by this AD for that drain mast only.
(2) For any composite gray water drain mast identified during
the inspection or records check required by paragraph (f) of this
AD, do the actions specified in paragraph (g) of this AD.
Installation of New Ground Bracket and Bonding Jumper
(g) For any composite gray water drain mast identified during
the inspection or records check required by paragraph (f) of this
AD: Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD, install a
bonding jumper between the new ground bracket and the clamp on the
tube of the gray water composite drain mast, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 767-30-0047, dated January 25, 2007 (for Model 767-200, -
300, and -300F series airplanes); and Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 767-30-0048, dated January 25, 2007 (for Model 767-
400ER series airplanes).
Parts Installation
(h) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install,
on any airplane, a composite gray water drain mast, unless a new
ground bracket and bonding jumper are also installed, as specified
in paragraph (g) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(i)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(j) You must use Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 767-
30-0047, dated January 25, 2007; or Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 767-30-0048, dated January 25, 2007; as applicable; to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington
98124-2207.
(3) You may review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or
go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 7, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-8317 Filed 4-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P