Elimination of Co-Payment for Weight Management Counseling, 20530-20532 [E8-8097]
Download as PDF
20530
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 16, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
FDC date
03/21/08
03/21/08
03/21/08
03/21/08
State
City
Airport
FDC No.
......
......
......
......
IN
IN
IN
IA
FORT WAYNE
RENSSELAER
FORT WAYNE
CENTERVILLE
................
................
................
................
SMITH FIELD .......................................
JASPER COUNTY ...............................
SMITH FIELD .......................................
CENTERVILLE MUNI ..........................
8/9217
8/9218
8/9219
8/9279
03/21/08 ......
IA
CENTERVILLE ................
CENTERVILLE MUNI ..........................
8/9280
03/21/08 ......
OH
COLUMBUS ....................
PORT COLUMBUS INTL .....................
8/9287
03/21/08 ......
OH
COLUMBUS ....................
PORT COLUMBUS INTL .....................
8/9288
03/27/08 ......
03/28/08 ......
IN
AR
GREENCASTLE ..............
MORRILTON ...................
PUTNAM COUNTY ..............................
MORRILTON MUNI .............................
8/0033
8/0183
03/31/08
03/31/08
03/31/08
04/01/08
04/01/08
04/01/08
......
......
......
......
......
......
NY
VA
WI
MS
GA
NC
OGDENSBURG ..............
NORFOLK .......................
PRAIRIE DU SAC ...........
CLEVELAND ...................
BAXLEY ..........................
ROANOKE RAPIDS ........
OGDENSBURG INTL ..........................
NORFOLK INTL ...................................
SAUK–PRAIRIE ...................................
CLEVELAND MUNI .............................
BAXLEY MUNI .....................................
HALIFAX COUNTY ..............................
8/0386
8/0400
8/0408
8/0514
8/0516
8/0518
04/01/08
04/01/08
04/01/08
04/01/08
04/01/08
04/01/08
04/01/08
04/01/08
04/02/08
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
CT
MS
MS
ID
ID
SC
SC
SC
CA
WINDSOR LOCKS ..........
MARKS ............................
MARKS ............................
GRANGEVILLE ...............
GRANGEVILLE ...............
WALTERBORO ...............
WALTERBORO ...............
WALTERBORO ...............
DELANO ..........................
BRADLEY INTL ...................................
SELFS ..................................................
SELFS ..................................................
IDAHO COUNTY .................................
IDAHO COUNTY .................................
LOWCOUNTRY REGIONAL ...............
LOWCOUNTRY REGIONAL ...............
LOWCOUNTRY REGIONAL ...............
DELANO MUNI ....................................
8/0520
8/0593
8/0594
8/0630
8/0631
8/0637
8/0638
8/0641
8/0805
04/02/08 ......
04/02/08 ......
04/02/08 ......
CA
WY
UT
MARYSVILLE ..................
JACKSON .......................
LOGAN ............................
YUBA COUNTY ...................................
JACKSON HOLE .................................
LOGAN-CACHE ...................................
8/0807
8/0808
8/0809
04/02/08 ......
CA
SAN FRANCISCO ...........
SAN FRANCISCO INTL ......................
8/0810
the co-payment barrier. This direct final
rule also amends the medical
regulations by making nonsubstantive
changes to correct references to
statutory provisions.
[FR Doc. E8–8048 Filed 4–15–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
This rule is effective on June 16,
2008, without further notice, unless VA
receives relevant adverse comments by
May 16, 2008.
DATES:
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900–AM59
Elimination of Co-Payment for Weight
Management Counseling
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) is taking direct action to
amend its medical regulations
concerning co-payments for inpatient
hospital care and outpatient medical
care. More specifically, this rule
designates weight management
counseling (individual and group
sessions) as a service that is not subject
to co-payment requirements. The
intended effect of this direct final rule
is to increase participation in weight
management counseling by removing
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:06 Apr 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
Written comments may be
submitted through
www.Regulations.gov; by mail or handdelivery to the Director, Regulations
Management (00REG), Department of
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave.,
NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC
20420; or by fax to (202) 273–9026.
Comments should indicate that they are
submitted in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–
AM59—Elimination of Co-payment for
Weight Management Counseling.’’
Copies of comments received will be
available for public inspection in the
Office of Regulation Policy and
Management, Room 1063B, between the
hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday
through Friday (except holidays). Please
call (202) 461–4902 for an appointment
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Subject
GPS RWY 13, ORIG.
GPS RWY 18, ORIG.
VOR RWY 13, AMDT 9.
NDB OR GPS RWY 34, AMDT
1A.
NDB OR GPS RWY 16, AMDT
1A.
ILS OR LOC RWY 28L, AMDT
28.
ILS OR LOC RWY 10L, AMDT
18.
RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, AMDT 1.
TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS AND
(OBSTACLE)
DEPARTURE
PROCEDURES, ORIG.
RNAV (GPS) RWY 27, ORIG.
ILS RWY 5, AMDT 24E.
RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, ORIG.
GPS RWY 35, ORIG.
NDB RWY 8, AMDT 1.
NDB OR GPS RWY 5, AMDT
3B.
ILS RWY 24, AMDT 10A.
RNAV (GPS) RWY 2, ORIG.
RNAV (GPS) RWY 20, ORIG.
GPS RWY 25, ORIG.
GPS RWY 7, ORIG.
GPS RWY 35, ORIG.
GPS RWY 17, ORIG.
GPS RWY 5, ORIG–A.
TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS AND
(OBSTACLE)
DEPARTURE
PROCEDURES, AMDT 3.
ILS OR LOC RWY 14, AMDT 5.
RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 1, ORIG.
ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 17,
ORIG.
RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 28R,
AMDT 2A.
(this is not a toll-free number). In
addition, during the comment period,
comments may be viewed online
through the Federal Docket Management
System (FDMS) at www.Regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tony Guagliardo, Director, Business
Policy, Chief Business Office (16),
Veterans Health Administration, 810
Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20420, (202) 254–0384 (this is not a tollfree number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
document amends VA’s ‘‘Medical’’
regulations, which are set forth at 38
CFR part 17 (referred to below as the
regulations), to eliminate co-payments
for weight management counseling
(individual and group sessions).
A large number of veterans using VA
medical facilities are overweight (body
mass index of 25–29.9) or obese (body
mass index of 30 or higher). Among
male veterans using VA medical
facilities in 2000, 40 percent were
classified as overweight and 33 percent
were classified as obese. Among female
veterans using VA medical facilities in
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 16, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
2000, 31 percent were classified as
overweight and 37 percent were
classified as obese.
Poor diet and physical inactivity are
rapidly overtaking smoking as the
leading preventable cause of morbidity
and mortality in the United States.
Further, most of the morbidity and
mortality related to poor diet and
physical inactivity can be attributed to
excess weight. However, even modest
weight loss and increased physical
activity can result in improved health
outcomes, especially for individuals
with diabetes or likely to get diabetes,
a highly prevalent condition among
veterans seeking healthcare at VA
facilities. Being overweight or obese are
also conditions clearly associated with
coronary heart disease (CHD), CHD risks
(hypertension, hyperlipidemia), certain
cancers, gallbladder disease, obstructive
sleep apnea, osteoarthritis, and all-cause
mortality. Consequently, the health care
costs for obesity-associated conditions
throughout the United States are
substantial with estimates of the total
annual expenditures in the United Sates
consisting of as much as $107.2 billion
in 2006 dollars.
To combat the effects of being
overweight or obese, VA has established
‘‘Managing Overweight/Obesity for
Veterans Everywhere!’’ (MOVE!). This is
a comprehensive, evidence-based
weight management program that
consists of both individual and group
counseling.
Currently, VA regulations require
many veterans to agree to make copayments as a condition for
participation in the MOVE! program.
However, field providers report that copayments are a significant barrier to
participation in the counseling program.
The co-payment requirement is
estimated to generate approximately
$1,001,294 annually. However, we
believe that not imposing co-payments
would be clearly cost effective based on
the conclusion that the costs of
healthcare for overweight and obese
individuals become significantly lower
as they lose weight. Accordingly, we are
eliminating co-payments for weight
management counseling.
The MOVE! program is based
primarily upon the National Institutes of
Health/ National Heart, Lung, and Blood
Institute’s Clinical Guidelines for the
Identification, Evaluation, and
Treatment of Overweight and Obesity
and is consistent with the weight
management recommendations of the
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force,
supported by the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality in the Department
of Health and Human Services. An
Executive Council consisting of federal
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:06 Apr 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
weight management experts and
external expert advisors reviewed
MOVE! and declared the MOVE!
program to be consistent with current
medical guidance and recommendations
for weight management.
MOVE! became widely implemented
across VA facilities as a standard
clinical program over the past several
years. The MOVE! program provides
much of its care through frequent group
sessions, a very effective and efficient
format of weight management care.
Effective treatment typically results in a
5–10 percent weight loss, which is
associated with improvement in weightrelated conditions such as hypertension,
dyslipidemia, and diabetes. VA expects
that elimination of the copayment
associated with weight management
treatment visits will facilitate continued
patient engagement in treatment,
resulting in better clinical outcomes.
Over the long run, the loss in revenue
from elimination of the copayment is
expected to be off-set by lower health
care costs for weight-related conditions.
Limited research exists to fully
understand the exact impact of a policy
change such as this. While VA expects
this change to be cost effective in the
long run, VA will monitor results to
assist in future decision-making
concerning this and similar programs.
VA will work with its research
community to retrospectively evaluate
the impact of this policy change.
This document also amends 38 CFR
17.47(e)(2) by making nonsubstantive
changes to correct references to
statutory provisions. Section 17.47(e)(2)
currently states that if a veteran
provided inaccurate information on an
application and is incorrectly deemed
eligible for care under 38 U.S.C.
1710(a)(1) rather than section 1710(a)(2),
VA shall retroactively bill the veteran
for the applicable copayment. When
§ 17.47(e)(2) was initially promulgated,
section 1710(a)(2) pertained to veterans
who were not described in section
1710(a)(1) and who were therefore
subject to the copayment requirements
then set forth in section 1710(f). In 1996,
section 1710(a) was amended by section
101(a) of Public Law 104–262. Under
the amendments, veterans previously
described in section 1710(a)(1) are now
described in section 1710(a)(1) and
(a)(2). Veterans previously described in
section 1710(a)(2) are now described in
section 1710(a)(3). The amendment to
§ 17.47(e)(2) corrects the references to
these statutory provisions.
Administrative Procedure Act
VA anticipates that this noncontroversial rule will not result in
adverse or negative comment and,
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20531
therefore, is issuing it as a direct final
rule. Previous actions of this nature,
which remove restrictions on VA
medical benefits to improve health
outcomes, have not been controversial
and have not resulted in significant
adverse comments or objections.
However, in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’
section of this Federal Register
publication we are publishing a
separate, substantially identical
proposed rule document that will serve
as a proposal for the provisions in this
direct final rule if significant adverse
comments are filed. (See RIN 2900–
AM81).
For purposes of the direct final
rulemaking, a significant adverse
comment is one that explains why the
rule would be inappropriate, including
challenges to the rule’s underlying
premise or approach, or why it would
be ineffective or unacceptable without
change. If significant adverse comments
are received, the VA will publish a
notice of receipt of significant adverse
comments in the Federal Register
withdrawing the direct final rule.
Under direct final rule procedures,
unless significant adverse comments are
received within the comment period,
the regulation will become effective on
the date specified above. After the close
of the comment period, VA will publish
a document in the Federal Register
indicating that no adverse comments
were received and confirming the date
on which the final rule will become
effective. VA will also publish a notice
withdrawing the proposed rule, RIN
2900–AM81.
In the event the direct final rule is
withdrawn because of receipt of
significant adverse comments, VA can
proceed with the rulemaking by
addressing the comments received and
publishing a final rule. The comment
period for the proposed rule runs
concurrently with that of the direct final
rule. Any comments received under the
direct final rule will be treated as
comments regarding the proposed rule.
Likewise, significant adverse comments
submitted to the proposed rule will be
considered as comments to the direct
final rule. The VA will consider such
comments in developing a subsequent
final rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this regulatory amendment will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. The
adoption of the rule would not directly
affect any small entities. Only
individuals could be directly affected.
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
20532
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 16, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b),
this amendment is exempt from the
initial and final regulatory flexibility
analysis requirements of sections 603
and 604.
Executive Order 12866
Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
when regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity). The
Executive Order classifies a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ requiring review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) unless OMB waives such review,
as any regulatory action that is likely to
result in a rule that may: (1) Have an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) create
a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency; (3)
materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this direct final rule
have been examined and it has been
determined to be a significant regulatory
action under the Executive Order
because it is likely to result in a rule that
may raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or principles set
forth in the Executive Order.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document does not contain any
provisions constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3521).
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in
expenditure by State, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:06 Apr 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
given year. This rule would have no
such effect on State, local, or tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
POSTAL SERVICE
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers
Pricing and Requirement Changes for
Competitive Products
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance numbers and titles for the
programs affected by this document are
64.009, Veterans Medical Care Benefits;
and 64.012, Veterans Prescription
Service.
AGENCY:
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alcohol abuse, Alcoholism,
Claims, Day care, Dental health, Drug
abuse, Foreign relations, Government
contracts, Grant programs—health,
Grant programs—veterans, Health care,
Health facilities, Health professions,
Health records, Homeless, Medical and
Dental schools, Medical devices,
Medical research, Mental health
programs, Nursing homes, Philippines,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Scholarships and
fellowships, Travel and transportation
expenses, Veterans.
Approved: December 26, 2007.
James B. Peake,
Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
Editorial Note: This document was
received at the Office of the Federal Register
on April 11, 2008.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, VA amends 38 CFR part 17 as
follows:
I
PART 17—MEDICAL
1. The authority citation for part 17
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1721, unless
otherwise noted.
2. Amend § 17.108 by redesignating
paragraphs (e)(12) and (e)(13) as
paragraphs (e)(13) and (e)(14),
respectively; and by adding a new
paragraph (e)(12) to read as follows:
I
§ 17.108 Co-payments for inpatient
hospital care and outpatient medical care.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(12) Weight management counseling
(individual and group);
*
*
*
*
*
I 3. In § 17.47(e)(2), remove ‘‘under 38
U.S.C. 1710(a)(1) rather than
§ 1710(a)(2)’’ and add, in its place,
‘‘under 38 U.S.C. 1710(a)(1) or (a)(2)
rather than 38 U.S.C. 1710(a)(3)’’.
[FR Doc. E8–8097 Filed 4–15–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
39 CFR Part 111
Postal ServiceTM.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Postal Service is revising
Mailing Standards of the United States
Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual
(DMM) to reflect changes to the prices
and standards for the following
competitive products, now referred to as
Shipping Services:
• Express Mail
• Priority Mail
• Parcel Select
• Parcel Return Service
DATES: Effective Date: May 12, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bert
Olsen at 202–268–7276 or Monica Grein
at 202–268–8411.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Postal
Accountability and Enhancement Act of
2006 (PAEA) gives the Postal Service
increased flexibility in pricing, product
enhancements, and product
introductions. On March 4, 2008, the
Governors of the Postal Service
established new prices and product
features for Shipping Services. This
Federal Register notice describes these
price and product changes and the
mailing standards changes needed to
implement them.
Express Mail
We are moving from Express Mail
prices based only on weight to zonebased prices based on weight and
distance, consistent with standard
industry practices. On average, Express
Mail prices will increase 3 percent, with
larger increases for heavier pieces and
pieces destined for Zones 5 through 8
(mail transported more than 600 miles).
Express Mail commercial base prices
are 3 percent lower than retail prices
and will be available to customers who:
use Express Mail Corporate Accounts
(EMCA), including Federal Agency
Accounts or Click-N-Ship; or are
registered end-users of PC PostageTM
(e.g. Stamps.com, endiciaTM, and
Pitney Bowes) using shipping labels.
To encourage growth, commercial
volume rebates will be provided to
customers whose account volume
exceeds a minimum threshold, and who
either use an Express Mail Corporate
Account (EMCA), including Federal
Agency Accounts or are registered endusers of PC-Postage (e.g. Stamps.com,
endicia, and Pitney Bowes) using
shipping labels. The rebate will be
credited to each qualifying mail owner’s
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 74 (Wednesday, April 16, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20530-20532]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-8097]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900-AM59
Elimination of Co-Payment for Weight Management Counseling
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is taking direct
action to amend its medical regulations concerning co-payments for
inpatient hospital care and outpatient medical care. More specifically,
this rule designates weight management counseling (individual and group
sessions) as a service that is not subject to co-payment requirements.
The intended effect of this direct final rule is to increase
participation in weight management counseling by removing the co-
payment barrier. This direct final rule also amends the medical
regulations by making nonsubstantive changes to correct references to
statutory provisions.
DATES: This rule is effective on June 16, 2008, without further notice,
unless VA receives relevant adverse comments by May 16, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through
www.Regulations.gov; by mail or hand-delivery to the Director,
Regulations Management (00REG), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Ave., NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to (202)
273-9026. Comments should indicate that they are submitted in response
to ``RIN 2900-AM59--Elimination of Co-payment for Weight Management
Counseling.'' Copies of comments received will be available for public
inspection in the Office of Regulation Policy and Management, Room
1063B, between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday
(except holidays). Please call (202) 461-4902 for an appointment (this
is not a toll-free number). In addition, during the comment period,
comments may be viewed online through the Federal Docket Management
System (FDMS) at www.Regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tony Guagliardo, Director, Business
Policy, Chief Business Office (16), Veterans Health Administration, 810
Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 254-0384 (this is not
a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document amends VA's ``Medical''
regulations, which are set forth at 38 CFR part 17 (referred to below
as the regulations), to eliminate co-payments for weight management
counseling (individual and group sessions).
A large number of veterans using VA medical facilities are
overweight (body mass index of 25-29.9) or obese (body mass index of 30
or higher). Among male veterans using VA medical facilities in 2000, 40
percent were classified as overweight and 33 percent were classified as
obese. Among female veterans using VA medical facilities in
[[Page 20531]]
2000, 31 percent were classified as overweight and 37 percent were
classified as obese.
Poor diet and physical inactivity are rapidly overtaking smoking as
the leading preventable cause of morbidity and mortality in the United
States. Further, most of the morbidity and mortality related to poor
diet and physical inactivity can be attributed to excess weight.
However, even modest weight loss and increased physical activity can
result in improved health outcomes, especially for individuals with
diabetes or likely to get diabetes, a highly prevalent condition among
veterans seeking healthcare at VA facilities. Being overweight or obese
are also conditions clearly associated with coronary heart disease
(CHD), CHD risks (hypertension, hyperlipidemia), certain cancers,
gallbladder disease, obstructive sleep apnea, osteoarthritis, and all-
cause mortality. Consequently, the health care costs for obesity-
associated conditions throughout the United States are substantial with
estimates of the total annual expenditures in the United Sates
consisting of as much as $107.2 billion in 2006 dollars.
To combat the effects of being overweight or obese, VA has
established ``Managing Overweight/Obesity for Veterans Everywhere!''
(MOVE!). This is a comprehensive, evidence-based weight management
program that consists of both individual and group counseling.
Currently, VA regulations require many veterans to agree to make
co-payments as a condition for participation in the MOVE! program.
However, field providers report that co-payments are a significant
barrier to participation in the counseling program. The co-payment
requirement is estimated to generate approximately $1,001,294 annually.
However, we believe that not imposing co-payments would be clearly cost
effective based on the conclusion that the costs of healthcare for
overweight and obese individuals become significantly lower as they
lose weight. Accordingly, we are eliminating co-payments for weight
management counseling.
The MOVE! program is based primarily upon the National Institutes
of Health/ National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Clinical
Guidelines for the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of
Overweight and Obesity and is consistent with the weight management
recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, supported
by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality in the Department of
Health and Human Services. An Executive Council consisting of federal
weight management experts and external expert advisors reviewed MOVE!
and declared the MOVE! program to be consistent with current medical
guidance and recommendations for weight management.
MOVE! became widely implemented across VA facilities as a standard
clinical program over the past several years. The MOVE! program
provides much of its care through frequent group sessions, a very
effective and efficient format of weight management care. Effective
treatment typically results in a 5-10 percent weight loss, which is
associated with improvement in weight-related conditions such as
hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes. VA expects that elimination
of the copayment associated with weight management treatment visits
will facilitate continued patient engagement in treatment, resulting in
better clinical outcomes. Over the long run, the loss in revenue from
elimination of the copayment is expected to be off-set by lower health
care costs for weight-related conditions.
Limited research exists to fully understand the exact impact of a
policy change such as this. While VA expects this change to be cost
effective in the long run, VA will monitor results to assist in future
decision-making concerning this and similar programs. VA will work with
its research community to retrospectively evaluate the impact of this
policy change.
This document also amends 38 CFR 17.47(e)(2) by making
nonsubstantive changes to correct references to statutory provisions.
Section 17.47(e)(2) currently states that if a veteran provided
inaccurate information on an application and is incorrectly deemed
eligible for care under 38 U.S.C. 1710(a)(1) rather than section
1710(a)(2), VA shall retroactively bill the veteran for the applicable
copayment. When Sec. 17.47(e)(2) was initially promulgated, section
1710(a)(2) pertained to veterans who were not described in section
1710(a)(1) and who were therefore subject to the copayment requirements
then set forth in section 1710(f). In 1996, section 1710(a) was amended
by section 101(a) of Public Law 104-262. Under the amendments, veterans
previously described in section 1710(a)(1) are now described in section
1710(a)(1) and (a)(2). Veterans previously described in section
1710(a)(2) are now described in section 1710(a)(3). The amendment to
Sec. 17.47(e)(2) corrects the references to these statutory
provisions.
Administrative Procedure Act
VA anticipates that this non-controversial rule will not result in
adverse or negative comment and, therefore, is issuing it as a direct
final rule. Previous actions of this nature, which remove restrictions
on VA medical benefits to improve health outcomes, have not been
controversial and have not resulted in significant adverse comments or
objections. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of this Federal
Register publication we are publishing a separate, substantially
identical proposed rule document that will serve as a proposal for the
provisions in this direct final rule if significant adverse comments
are filed. (See RIN 2900-AM81).
For purposes of the direct final rulemaking, a significant adverse
comment is one that explains why the rule would be inappropriate,
including challenges to the rule's underlying premise or approach, or
why it would be ineffective or unacceptable without change. If
significant adverse comments are received, the VA will publish a notice
of receipt of significant adverse comments in the Federal Register
withdrawing the direct final rule.
Under direct final rule procedures, unless significant adverse
comments are received within the comment period, the regulation will
become effective on the date specified above. After the close of the
comment period, VA will publish a document in the Federal Register
indicating that no adverse comments were received and confirming the
date on which the final rule will become effective. VA will also
publish a notice withdrawing the proposed rule, RIN 2900-AM81.
In the event the direct final rule is withdrawn because of receipt
of significant adverse comments, VA can proceed with the rulemaking by
addressing the comments received and publishing a final rule. The
comment period for the proposed rule runs concurrently with that of the
direct final rule. Any comments received under the direct final rule
will be treated as comments regarding the proposed rule. Likewise,
significant adverse comments submitted to the proposed rule will be
considered as comments to the direct final rule. The VA will consider
such comments in developing a subsequent final rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this regulatory amendment will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601-612. The adoption of the rule would not directly affect any
small entities. Only individuals could be directly affected.
[[Page 20532]]
Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this amendment is exempt from
the initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of
sections 603 and 604.
Executive Order 12866
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The Executive
Order classifies a ``significant regulatory action,'' requiring review
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) unless OMB waives such
review, as any regulatory action that is likely to result in a rule
that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) materially alter
the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4)
raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President's priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this direct final rule have been examined and it has
been determined to be a significant regulatory action under the
Executive Order because it is likely to result in a rule that may raise
novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President's priorities, or principles set forth in the Executive Order.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document does not contain any provisions constituting a
collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501-3521).
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in expenditure by
State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any given year. This rule would have no such effect on
State, local, or tribal governments, or on the private sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance numbers and titles for
the programs affected by this document are 64.009, Veterans Medical
Care Benefits; and 64.012, Veterans Prescription Service.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and procedure, Alcohol abuse, Alcoholism,
Claims, Day care, Dental health, Drug abuse, Foreign relations,
Government contracts, Grant programs--health, Grant programs--veterans,
Health care, Health facilities, Health professions, Health records,
Homeless, Medical and Dental schools, Medical devices, Medical
research, Mental health programs, Nursing homes, Philippines, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Scholarships and fellowships, Travel
and transportation expenses, Veterans.
Approved: December 26, 2007.
James B. Peake,
Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
Editorial Note: This document was received at the Office of the
Federal Register on April 11, 2008.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, VA amends 38 CFR part 17 as
follows:
PART 17--MEDICAL
0
1. The authority citation for part 17 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1721, unless otherwise noted.
0
2. Amend Sec. 17.108 by redesignating paragraphs (e)(12) and (e)(13)
as paragraphs (e)(13) and (e)(14), respectively; and by adding a new
paragraph (e)(12) to read as follows:
Sec. 17.108 Co-payments for inpatient hospital care and outpatient
medical care.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(12) Weight management counseling (individual and group);
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 17.47(e)(2), remove ``under 38 U.S.C. 1710(a)(1) rather
than Sec. 1710(a)(2)'' and add, in its place, ``under 38 U.S.C.
1710(a)(1) or (a)(2) rather than 38 U.S.C. 1710(a)(3)''.
[FR Doc. E8-8097 Filed 4-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P