Elimination of Co-Payment for Weight Management Counseling, 20530-20532 [E8-8097]

Download as PDF 20530 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 16, 2008 / Rules and Regulations FDC date 03/21/08 03/21/08 03/21/08 03/21/08 State City Airport FDC No. ...... ...... ...... ...... IN IN IN IA FORT WAYNE RENSSELAER FORT WAYNE CENTERVILLE ................ ................ ................ ................ SMITH FIELD ....................................... JASPER COUNTY ............................... SMITH FIELD ....................................... CENTERVILLE MUNI .......................... 8/9217 8/9218 8/9219 8/9279 03/21/08 ...... IA CENTERVILLE ................ CENTERVILLE MUNI .......................... 8/9280 03/21/08 ...... OH COLUMBUS .................... PORT COLUMBUS INTL ..................... 8/9287 03/21/08 ...... OH COLUMBUS .................... PORT COLUMBUS INTL ..................... 8/9288 03/27/08 ...... 03/28/08 ...... IN AR GREENCASTLE .............. MORRILTON ................... PUTNAM COUNTY .............................. MORRILTON MUNI ............................. 8/0033 8/0183 03/31/08 03/31/08 03/31/08 04/01/08 04/01/08 04/01/08 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... NY VA WI MS GA NC OGDENSBURG .............. NORFOLK ....................... PRAIRIE DU SAC ........... CLEVELAND ................... BAXLEY .......................... ROANOKE RAPIDS ........ OGDENSBURG INTL .......................... NORFOLK INTL ................................... SAUK–PRAIRIE ................................... CLEVELAND MUNI ............................. BAXLEY MUNI ..................................... HALIFAX COUNTY .............................. 8/0386 8/0400 8/0408 8/0514 8/0516 8/0518 04/01/08 04/01/08 04/01/08 04/01/08 04/01/08 04/01/08 04/01/08 04/01/08 04/02/08 ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... CT MS MS ID ID SC SC SC CA WINDSOR LOCKS .......... MARKS ............................ MARKS ............................ GRANGEVILLE ............... GRANGEVILLE ............... WALTERBORO ............... WALTERBORO ............... WALTERBORO ............... DELANO .......................... BRADLEY INTL ................................... SELFS .................................................. SELFS .................................................. IDAHO COUNTY ................................. IDAHO COUNTY ................................. LOWCOUNTRY REGIONAL ............... LOWCOUNTRY REGIONAL ............... LOWCOUNTRY REGIONAL ............... DELANO MUNI .................................... 8/0520 8/0593 8/0594 8/0630 8/0631 8/0637 8/0638 8/0641 8/0805 04/02/08 ...... 04/02/08 ...... 04/02/08 ...... CA WY UT MARYSVILLE .................. JACKSON ....................... LOGAN ............................ YUBA COUNTY ................................... JACKSON HOLE ................................. LOGAN-CACHE ................................... 8/0807 8/0808 8/0809 04/02/08 ...... CA SAN FRANCISCO ........... SAN FRANCISCO INTL ...................... 8/0810 the co-payment barrier. This direct final rule also amends the medical regulations by making nonsubstantive changes to correct references to statutory provisions. [FR Doc. E8–8048 Filed 4–15–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS This rule is effective on June 16, 2008, without further notice, unless VA receives relevant adverse comments by May 16, 2008. DATES: 38 CFR Part 17 RIN 2900–AM59 Elimination of Co-Payment for Weight Management Counseling Department of Veterans Affairs. Direct final rule. AGENCY: jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES ACTION: SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is taking direct action to amend its medical regulations concerning co-payments for inpatient hospital care and outpatient medical care. More specifically, this rule designates weight management counseling (individual and group sessions) as a service that is not subject to co-payment requirements. The intended effect of this direct final rule is to increase participation in weight management counseling by removing VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:06 Apr 15, 2008 Jkt 214001 Written comments may be submitted through www.Regulations.gov; by mail or handdelivery to the Director, Regulations Management (00REG), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave., NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to (202) 273–9026. Comments should indicate that they are submitted in response to ‘‘RIN 2900– AM59—Elimination of Co-payment for Weight Management Counseling.’’ Copies of comments received will be available for public inspection in the Office of Regulation Policy and Management, Room 1063B, between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday (except holidays). Please call (202) 461–4902 for an appointment ADDRESSES: PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Subject GPS RWY 13, ORIG. GPS RWY 18, ORIG. VOR RWY 13, AMDT 9. NDB OR GPS RWY 34, AMDT 1A. NDB OR GPS RWY 16, AMDT 1A. ILS OR LOC RWY 28L, AMDT 28. ILS OR LOC RWY 10L, AMDT 18. RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, AMDT 1. TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS AND (OBSTACLE) DEPARTURE PROCEDURES, ORIG. RNAV (GPS) RWY 27, ORIG. ILS RWY 5, AMDT 24E. RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, ORIG. GPS RWY 35, ORIG. NDB RWY 8, AMDT 1. NDB OR GPS RWY 5, AMDT 3B. ILS RWY 24, AMDT 10A. RNAV (GPS) RWY 2, ORIG. RNAV (GPS) RWY 20, ORIG. GPS RWY 25, ORIG. GPS RWY 7, ORIG. GPS RWY 35, ORIG. GPS RWY 17, ORIG. GPS RWY 5, ORIG–A. TAKE-OFF MINIMUMS AND (OBSTACLE) DEPARTURE PROCEDURES, AMDT 3. ILS OR LOC RWY 14, AMDT 5. RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 1, ORIG. ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 17, ORIG. RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 28R, AMDT 2A. (this is not a toll-free number). In addition, during the comment period, comments may be viewed online through the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) at www.Regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tony Guagliardo, Director, Business Policy, Chief Business Office (16), Veterans Health Administration, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 254–0384 (this is not a tollfree number). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document amends VA’s ‘‘Medical’’ regulations, which are set forth at 38 CFR part 17 (referred to below as the regulations), to eliminate co-payments for weight management counseling (individual and group sessions). A large number of veterans using VA medical facilities are overweight (body mass index of 25–29.9) or obese (body mass index of 30 or higher). Among male veterans using VA medical facilities in 2000, 40 percent were classified as overweight and 33 percent were classified as obese. Among female veterans using VA medical facilities in E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM 16APR1 jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 16, 2008 / Rules and Regulations 2000, 31 percent were classified as overweight and 37 percent were classified as obese. Poor diet and physical inactivity are rapidly overtaking smoking as the leading preventable cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Further, most of the morbidity and mortality related to poor diet and physical inactivity can be attributed to excess weight. However, even modest weight loss and increased physical activity can result in improved health outcomes, especially for individuals with diabetes or likely to get diabetes, a highly prevalent condition among veterans seeking healthcare at VA facilities. Being overweight or obese are also conditions clearly associated with coronary heart disease (CHD), CHD risks (hypertension, hyperlipidemia), certain cancers, gallbladder disease, obstructive sleep apnea, osteoarthritis, and all-cause mortality. Consequently, the health care costs for obesity-associated conditions throughout the United States are substantial with estimates of the total annual expenditures in the United Sates consisting of as much as $107.2 billion in 2006 dollars. To combat the effects of being overweight or obese, VA has established ‘‘Managing Overweight/Obesity for Veterans Everywhere!’’ (MOVE!). This is a comprehensive, evidence-based weight management program that consists of both individual and group counseling. Currently, VA regulations require many veterans to agree to make copayments as a condition for participation in the MOVE! program. However, field providers report that copayments are a significant barrier to participation in the counseling program. The co-payment requirement is estimated to generate approximately $1,001,294 annually. However, we believe that not imposing co-payments would be clearly cost effective based on the conclusion that the costs of healthcare for overweight and obese individuals become significantly lower as they lose weight. Accordingly, we are eliminating co-payments for weight management counseling. The MOVE! program is based primarily upon the National Institutes of Health/ National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s Clinical Guidelines for the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity and is consistent with the weight management recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality in the Department of Health and Human Services. An Executive Council consisting of federal VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:06 Apr 15, 2008 Jkt 214001 weight management experts and external expert advisors reviewed MOVE! and declared the MOVE! program to be consistent with current medical guidance and recommendations for weight management. MOVE! became widely implemented across VA facilities as a standard clinical program over the past several years. The MOVE! program provides much of its care through frequent group sessions, a very effective and efficient format of weight management care. Effective treatment typically results in a 5–10 percent weight loss, which is associated with improvement in weightrelated conditions such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes. VA expects that elimination of the copayment associated with weight management treatment visits will facilitate continued patient engagement in treatment, resulting in better clinical outcomes. Over the long run, the loss in revenue from elimination of the copayment is expected to be off-set by lower health care costs for weight-related conditions. Limited research exists to fully understand the exact impact of a policy change such as this. While VA expects this change to be cost effective in the long run, VA will monitor results to assist in future decision-making concerning this and similar programs. VA will work with its research community to retrospectively evaluate the impact of this policy change. This document also amends 38 CFR 17.47(e)(2) by making nonsubstantive changes to correct references to statutory provisions. Section 17.47(e)(2) currently states that if a veteran provided inaccurate information on an application and is incorrectly deemed eligible for care under 38 U.S.C. 1710(a)(1) rather than section 1710(a)(2), VA shall retroactively bill the veteran for the applicable copayment. When § 17.47(e)(2) was initially promulgated, section 1710(a)(2) pertained to veterans who were not described in section 1710(a)(1) and who were therefore subject to the copayment requirements then set forth in section 1710(f). In 1996, section 1710(a) was amended by section 101(a) of Public Law 104–262. Under the amendments, veterans previously described in section 1710(a)(1) are now described in section 1710(a)(1) and (a)(2). Veterans previously described in section 1710(a)(2) are now described in section 1710(a)(3). The amendment to § 17.47(e)(2) corrects the references to these statutory provisions. Administrative Procedure Act VA anticipates that this noncontroversial rule will not result in adverse or negative comment and, PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 20531 therefore, is issuing it as a direct final rule. Previous actions of this nature, which remove restrictions on VA medical benefits to improve health outcomes, have not been controversial and have not resulted in significant adverse comments or objections. However, in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of this Federal Register publication we are publishing a separate, substantially identical proposed rule document that will serve as a proposal for the provisions in this direct final rule if significant adverse comments are filed. (See RIN 2900– AM81). For purposes of the direct final rulemaking, a significant adverse comment is one that explains why the rule would be inappropriate, including challenges to the rule’s underlying premise or approach, or why it would be ineffective or unacceptable without change. If significant adverse comments are received, the VA will publish a notice of receipt of significant adverse comments in the Federal Register withdrawing the direct final rule. Under direct final rule procedures, unless significant adverse comments are received within the comment period, the regulation will become effective on the date specified above. After the close of the comment period, VA will publish a document in the Federal Register indicating that no adverse comments were received and confirming the date on which the final rule will become effective. VA will also publish a notice withdrawing the proposed rule, RIN 2900–AM81. In the event the direct final rule is withdrawn because of receipt of significant adverse comments, VA can proceed with the rulemaking by addressing the comments received and publishing a final rule. The comment period for the proposed rule runs concurrently with that of the direct final rule. Any comments received under the direct final rule will be treated as comments regarding the proposed rule. Likewise, significant adverse comments submitted to the proposed rule will be considered as comments to the direct final rule. The VA will consider such comments in developing a subsequent final rule. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Secretary hereby certifies that this regulatory amendment will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. The adoption of the rule would not directly affect any small entities. Only individuals could be directly affected. E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM 16APR1 20532 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 16, 2008 / Rules and Regulations Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this amendment is exempt from the initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of sections 603 and 604. Executive Order 12866 Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The Executive Order classifies a ‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ requiring review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) unless OMB waives such review, as any regulatory action that is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President’s priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive Order. The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy implications of this direct final rule have been examined and it has been determined to be a significant regulatory action under the Executive Order because it is likely to result in a rule that may raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President’s priorities, or principles set forth in the Executive Order. jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES Paperwork Reduction Act This document does not contain any provisions constituting a collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 3521). Unfunded Mandates The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and benefits before issuing any rule that may result in expenditure by State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:06 Apr 15, 2008 Jkt 214001 given year. This rule would have no such effect on State, local, or tribal governments, or on the private sector. POSTAL SERVICE Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers Pricing and Requirement Changes for Competitive Products The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance numbers and titles for the programs affected by this document are 64.009, Veterans Medical Care Benefits; and 64.012, Veterans Prescription Service. AGENCY: List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17 Administrative practice and procedure, Alcohol abuse, Alcoholism, Claims, Day care, Dental health, Drug abuse, Foreign relations, Government contracts, Grant programs—health, Grant programs—veterans, Health care, Health facilities, Health professions, Health records, Homeless, Medical and Dental schools, Medical devices, Medical research, Mental health programs, Nursing homes, Philippines, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Scholarships and fellowships, Travel and transportation expenses, Veterans. Approved: December 26, 2007. James B. Peake, Secretary of Veterans Affairs. Editorial Note: This document was received at the Office of the Federal Register on April 11, 2008. For the reasons set out in the preamble, VA amends 38 CFR part 17 as follows: I PART 17—MEDICAL 1. The authority citation for part 17 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1721, unless otherwise noted. 2. Amend § 17.108 by redesignating paragraphs (e)(12) and (e)(13) as paragraphs (e)(13) and (e)(14), respectively; and by adding a new paragraph (e)(12) to read as follows: I § 17.108 Co-payments for inpatient hospital care and outpatient medical care. * * * * * (e) * * * (12) Weight management counseling (individual and group); * * * * * I 3. In § 17.47(e)(2), remove ‘‘under 38 U.S.C. 1710(a)(1) rather than § 1710(a)(2)’’ and add, in its place, ‘‘under 38 U.S.C. 1710(a)(1) or (a)(2) rather than 38 U.S.C. 1710(a)(3)’’. [FR Doc. E8–8097 Filed 4–15–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8320–01–P PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 39 CFR Part 111 Postal ServiceTM. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Postal Service is revising Mailing Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM) to reflect changes to the prices and standards for the following competitive products, now referred to as Shipping Services: • Express Mail • Priority Mail • Parcel Select • Parcel Return Service DATES: Effective Date: May 12, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bert Olsen at 202–268–7276 or Monica Grein at 202–268–8411. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006 (PAEA) gives the Postal Service increased flexibility in pricing, product enhancements, and product introductions. On March 4, 2008, the Governors of the Postal Service established new prices and product features for Shipping Services. This Federal Register notice describes these price and product changes and the mailing standards changes needed to implement them. Express Mail We are moving from Express Mail prices based only on weight to zonebased prices based on weight and distance, consistent with standard industry practices. On average, Express Mail prices will increase 3 percent, with larger increases for heavier pieces and pieces destined for Zones 5 through 8 (mail transported more than 600 miles). Express Mail commercial base prices are 3 percent lower than retail prices and will be available to customers who: use Express Mail Corporate Accounts (EMCA), including Federal Agency Accounts or Click-N-Ship; or are registered end-users of PC PostageTM (e.g. Stamps.com, endiciaTM, and Pitney Bowes) using shipping labels. To encourage growth, commercial volume rebates will be provided to customers whose account volume exceeds a minimum threshold, and who either use an Express Mail Corporate Account (EMCA), including Federal Agency Accounts or are registered endusers of PC-Postage (e.g. Stamps.com, endicia, and Pitney Bowes) using shipping labels. The rebate will be credited to each qualifying mail owner’s E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM 16APR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 74 (Wednesday, April 16, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20530-20532]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-8097]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

38 CFR Part 17

RIN 2900-AM59


Elimination of Co-Payment for Weight Management Counseling

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is taking direct 
action to amend its medical regulations concerning co-payments for 
inpatient hospital care and outpatient medical care. More specifically, 
this rule designates weight management counseling (individual and group 
sessions) as a service that is not subject to co-payment requirements. 
The intended effect of this direct final rule is to increase 
participation in weight management counseling by removing the co-
payment barrier. This direct final rule also amends the medical 
regulations by making nonsubstantive changes to correct references to 
statutory provisions.

DATES: This rule is effective on June 16, 2008, without further notice, 
unless VA receives relevant adverse comments by May 16, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through 
www.Regulations.gov; by mail or hand-delivery to the Director, 
Regulations Management (00REG), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 
Vermont Ave., NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to (202) 
273-9026. Comments should indicate that they are submitted in response 
to ``RIN 2900-AM59--Elimination of Co-payment for Weight Management 
Counseling.'' Copies of comments received will be available for public 
inspection in the Office of Regulation Policy and Management, Room 
1063B, between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday 
(except holidays). Please call (202) 461-4902 for an appointment (this 
is not a toll-free number). In addition, during the comment period, 
comments may be viewed online through the Federal Docket Management 
System (FDMS) at www.Regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tony Guagliardo, Director, Business 
Policy, Chief Business Office (16), Veterans Health Administration, 810 
Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 254-0384 (this is not 
a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document amends VA's ``Medical'' 
regulations, which are set forth at 38 CFR part 17 (referred to below 
as the regulations), to eliminate co-payments for weight management 
counseling (individual and group sessions).
    A large number of veterans using VA medical facilities are 
overweight (body mass index of 25-29.9) or obese (body mass index of 30 
or higher). Among male veterans using VA medical facilities in 2000, 40 
percent were classified as overweight and 33 percent were classified as 
obese. Among female veterans using VA medical facilities in

[[Page 20531]]

2000, 31 percent were classified as overweight and 37 percent were 
classified as obese.
    Poor diet and physical inactivity are rapidly overtaking smoking as 
the leading preventable cause of morbidity and mortality in the United 
States. Further, most of the morbidity and mortality related to poor 
diet and physical inactivity can be attributed to excess weight. 
However, even modest weight loss and increased physical activity can 
result in improved health outcomes, especially for individuals with 
diabetes or likely to get diabetes, a highly prevalent condition among 
veterans seeking healthcare at VA facilities. Being overweight or obese 
are also conditions clearly associated with coronary heart disease 
(CHD), CHD risks (hypertension, hyperlipidemia), certain cancers, 
gallbladder disease, obstructive sleep apnea, osteoarthritis, and all-
cause mortality. Consequently, the health care costs for obesity-
associated conditions throughout the United States are substantial with 
estimates of the total annual expenditures in the United Sates 
consisting of as much as $107.2 billion in 2006 dollars.
    To combat the effects of being overweight or obese, VA has 
established ``Managing Overweight/Obesity for Veterans Everywhere!'' 
(MOVE!). This is a comprehensive, evidence-based weight management 
program that consists of both individual and group counseling.
    Currently, VA regulations require many veterans to agree to make 
co-payments as a condition for participation in the MOVE! program. 
However, field providers report that co-payments are a significant 
barrier to participation in the counseling program. The co-payment 
requirement is estimated to generate approximately $1,001,294 annually. 
However, we believe that not imposing co-payments would be clearly cost 
effective based on the conclusion that the costs of healthcare for 
overweight and obese individuals become significantly lower as they 
lose weight. Accordingly, we are eliminating co-payments for weight 
management counseling.
    The MOVE! program is based primarily upon the National Institutes 
of Health/ National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Clinical 
Guidelines for the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of 
Overweight and Obesity and is consistent with the weight management 
recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, supported 
by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality in the Department of 
Health and Human Services. An Executive Council consisting of federal 
weight management experts and external expert advisors reviewed MOVE! 
and declared the MOVE! program to be consistent with current medical 
guidance and recommendations for weight management.
    MOVE! became widely implemented across VA facilities as a standard 
clinical program over the past several years. The MOVE! program 
provides much of its care through frequent group sessions, a very 
effective and efficient format of weight management care. Effective 
treatment typically results in a 5-10 percent weight loss, which is 
associated with improvement in weight-related conditions such as 
hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes. VA expects that elimination 
of the copayment associated with weight management treatment visits 
will facilitate continued patient engagement in treatment, resulting in 
better clinical outcomes. Over the long run, the loss in revenue from 
elimination of the copayment is expected to be off-set by lower health 
care costs for weight-related conditions.
    Limited research exists to fully understand the exact impact of a 
policy change such as this. While VA expects this change to be cost 
effective in the long run, VA will monitor results to assist in future 
decision-making concerning this and similar programs. VA will work with 
its research community to retrospectively evaluate the impact of this 
policy change.
    This document also amends 38 CFR 17.47(e)(2) by making 
nonsubstantive changes to correct references to statutory provisions. 
Section 17.47(e)(2) currently states that if a veteran provided 
inaccurate information on an application and is incorrectly deemed 
eligible for care under 38 U.S.C. 1710(a)(1) rather than section 
1710(a)(2), VA shall retroactively bill the veteran for the applicable 
copayment. When Sec.  17.47(e)(2) was initially promulgated, section 
1710(a)(2) pertained to veterans who were not described in section 
1710(a)(1) and who were therefore subject to the copayment requirements 
then set forth in section 1710(f). In 1996, section 1710(a) was amended 
by section 101(a) of Public Law 104-262. Under the amendments, veterans 
previously described in section 1710(a)(1) are now described in section 
1710(a)(1) and (a)(2). Veterans previously described in section 
1710(a)(2) are now described in section 1710(a)(3). The amendment to 
Sec.  17.47(e)(2) corrects the references to these statutory 
provisions.

Administrative Procedure Act

    VA anticipates that this non-controversial rule will not result in 
adverse or negative comment and, therefore, is issuing it as a direct 
final rule. Previous actions of this nature, which remove restrictions 
on VA medical benefits to improve health outcomes, have not been 
controversial and have not resulted in significant adverse comments or 
objections. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of this Federal 
Register publication we are publishing a separate, substantially 
identical proposed rule document that will serve as a proposal for the 
provisions in this direct final rule if significant adverse comments 
are filed. (See RIN 2900-AM81).
    For purposes of the direct final rulemaking, a significant adverse 
comment is one that explains why the rule would be inappropriate, 
including challenges to the rule's underlying premise or approach, or 
why it would be ineffective or unacceptable without change. If 
significant adverse comments are received, the VA will publish a notice 
of receipt of significant adverse comments in the Federal Register 
withdrawing the direct final rule.
    Under direct final rule procedures, unless significant adverse 
comments are received within the comment period, the regulation will 
become effective on the date specified above. After the close of the 
comment period, VA will publish a document in the Federal Register 
indicating that no adverse comments were received and confirming the 
date on which the final rule will become effective. VA will also 
publish a notice withdrawing the proposed rule, RIN 2900-AM81.
    In the event the direct final rule is withdrawn because of receipt 
of significant adverse comments, VA can proceed with the rulemaking by 
addressing the comments received and publishing a final rule. The 
comment period for the proposed rule runs concurrently with that of the 
direct final rule. Any comments received under the direct final rule 
will be treated as comments regarding the proposed rule. Likewise, 
significant adverse comments submitted to the proposed rule will be 
considered as comments to the direct final rule. The VA will consider 
such comments in developing a subsequent final rule.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Secretary hereby certifies that this regulatory amendment will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 
U.S.C. 601-612. The adoption of the rule would not directly affect any 
small entities. Only individuals could be directly affected.

[[Page 20532]]

Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this amendment is exempt from 
the initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of 
sections 603 and 604.

Executive Order 12866

    Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and 
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is 
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits 
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, 
and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The Executive 
Order classifies a ``significant regulatory action,'' requiring review 
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) unless OMB waives such 
review, as any regulatory action that is likely to result in a rule 
that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or 
more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the 
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public 
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or 
communities; (2) create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere 
with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) materially alter 
the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan 
programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) 
raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the 
President's priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive 
Order.
    The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy 
implications of this direct final rule have been examined and it has 
been determined to be a significant regulatory action under the 
Executive Order because it is likely to result in a rule that may raise 
novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the 
President's priorities, or principles set forth in the Executive Order.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This document does not contain any provisions constituting a 
collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. 3501-3521).

Unfunded Mandates

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and 
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in expenditure by 
State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the 
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for 
inflation) in any given year. This rule would have no such effect on 
State, local, or tribal governments, or on the private sector.

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers

    The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance numbers and titles for 
the programs affected by this document are 64.009, Veterans Medical 
Care Benefits; and 64.012, Veterans Prescription Service.

List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17

    Administrative practice and procedure, Alcohol abuse, Alcoholism, 
Claims, Day care, Dental health, Drug abuse, Foreign relations, 
Government contracts, Grant programs--health, Grant programs--veterans, 
Health care, Health facilities, Health professions, Health records, 
Homeless, Medical and Dental schools, Medical devices, Medical 
research, Mental health programs, Nursing homes, Philippines, Reporting 
and recordkeeping requirements, Scholarships and fellowships, Travel 
and transportation expenses, Veterans.

    Approved: December 26, 2007.
James B. Peake,
Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

    Editorial Note: This document was received at the Office of the 
Federal Register on April 11, 2008.


0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, VA amends 38 CFR part 17 as 
follows:

PART 17--MEDICAL

0
1. The authority citation for part 17 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1721, unless otherwise noted.


0
2. Amend Sec.  17.108 by redesignating paragraphs (e)(12) and (e)(13) 
as paragraphs (e)(13) and (e)(14), respectively; and by adding a new 
paragraph (e)(12) to read as follows:

Sec.  17.108  Co-payments for inpatient hospital care and outpatient 
medical care.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (12) Weight management counseling (individual and group);
* * * * *

0
3. In Sec.  17.47(e)(2), remove ``under 38 U.S.C. 1710(a)(1) rather 
than Sec.  1710(a)(2)'' and add, in its place, ``under 38 U.S.C. 
1710(a)(1) or (a)(2) rather than 38 U.S.C. 1710(a)(3)''.

[FR Doc. E8-8097 Filed 4-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.