Pacific Halibut Fisheries; Subsistence Fishing, 20008-20015 [E8-7902]
Download as PDF
20008
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 72 / Monday, April 14, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 8,
2008, under authority delegated in 49 CFR
part 106.
Edward T. Mazzullo,
Acting Associate Administrator for
Hazardous Materials Safety.
[FR Doc. E8–7829 Filed 4–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 300
[Docket No. 080310411–7566–01]
RIN 0648–AU14
Pacific Halibut Fisheries; Subsistence
Fishing
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations to
amend the subsistence fishery rules for
Pacific halibut in waters in and off
Alaska. These regulations are necessary
to address subsistence halibut
management concerns in densely
populated areas. This action is intended
to support the conservation and
management provisions of the Northern
Pacific Halibut Act of 1982.
DATES: Comments must be received no
later than May 14, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Sue
Salveson, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region, NMFS, Attn:
Ellen Sebastian. You may submit
comments, identified by ‘‘RIN 0648–
AU14’’ by any one of the following
methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal website at
https://www.regulations.gov.
• Mail: P. O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK
99802.
• Fax: (907) 586–7557.
• Hand delivery to the Federal
Building: 709 West 9th Street, Room
420A, Juneau, Alaska.
All comments received are a part of
the public record and will be posted to
https://www.regulations.gov without
change. All Personal Identifying
Information (e.g., name, address)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:10 Apr 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments. Attachments to electronic
comments must be in Microsoft Word,
Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe portable
document file (pdf) formats to be
accepted.
Copies of the Categorical Exclusion
(CE), Regulatory Impact Review (RIR),
and Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (IRFA) prepared for this action,
as well as the environmental assessment
(EA) prepared for the original
subsistence halibut action (68 FR 18145;
April 15, 2003) may be obtained from
the North Pacific Fishery Management
Council (Council) at 605 West 4th, Suite
306, Anchorage, Alaska 99501–2252,
907–271–2809; by mail from NMFS,
Alaska Region, P. O. Box 21668, Juneau,
AK 99802–1668, Attn: Ellen Sebastian,
Records Officer; in person at NMFS,
Alaska Region, 709 West 9th Street,
Room 420A, Juneau, Alaska; or via the
Internet at the NMFS Alaska Region
website at https://www.fakr.noaa.gov.
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this proposed
rule may be submitted to NMFS at the
above address and by e-mail to
DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax to
202–395–7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Becky Carls, 907–586–7228 or
becky.carls@noaa.gov, or Peggy
Murphy, 907–586–7228 or
peggy.murphy@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Need for Action
Management of the Pacific halibut
(hereafter halibut) fishery in and off
Alaska is based on an international
agreement between Canada and the
United States. This agreement, entitled
the ‘‘Convention between the United
States of America and Canada for the
Preservation of the Halibut Fishery of
the Northern Pacific Ocean and Bering
Sea’’ (Convention), was signed at
Ottawa, Canada, on March 2, 1953, and
amended by the ‘‘Protocol Amending
the Convention,’’ signed at Washington,
D.C., March 29, 1979. The Convention,
administered by the International
Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC), is
given effect in the United States by the
Northern Pacific Halibut Act of 1982
(Halibut Act).
The IPHC promulgates regulations
pursuant to the Convention. The IPHC’s
regulations are subject to approval by
the Secretary of State with concurrence
from the Secretary of Commerce
(Secretary). After approval by the
Secretary of State and the Secretary, the
IPHC regulations are published in the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Federal Register as annual management
measures pursuant to 50 CFR 300.62.
NMFS published the IPHC’s current
annual management measures on March
7, 2008 (73 FR 12280).
The Halibut Act also authorizes the
North Pacific Fishery Management
Council (Council) to develop halibut
fishery regulations, including limited
access regulations, in its geographic area
of concern that would apply to nationals
or vessels of the United States (Halibut
Act, section 773(c)). Such an action by
the Council is limited to only those
regulations that are in addition to, and
not in conflict with, IPHC regulations.
Council-developed regulations must be
approved and implemented by the
Secretary. Any allocation of halibut
fishing privileges must be fair and
equitable and consistent with other
applicable Federal law. The Council
used its authority under the Halibut Act
to recommend a subsistence halibut
program in October 2000 to recognize
and manage the subsistence fishery for
halibut.
The Secretary approved the Council’s
recommended subsistence halibut
program and published implementing
regulations on April 15, 2003 (68 FR
18145), and codified the program in 50
CFR part 300–subpart E, authorizing a
subsistence fishery for halibut in
Convention waters off Alaska. In April
2002, the Council proposed a suite of
amendments to its original subsistence
halibut program while postponing
several proposed amendments to be
included in a separate action.
Regulations implementing the initial
suite of amendments to the original
subsistence halibut program were
published on April 1, 2005 (70 FR
16742). These regulations (1) changed
the boundaries of the Anchorage/Matsu/
Kenai non-subsistence area; (2)
eliminated gear restrictions in Areas 4C,
4D, and 4E; (3) increased gear and
harvest restrictions in Area 2C; (4)
allowed retention of legal-sized
subsistence halibut with Community
Development Quota halibut in Areas 4C,
4D, and 4E; (5) created a Community
Harvest Permit (CHP) system to mitigate
increased gear and harvest restrictions
in affected areas; (6) created a
Ceremonial and Educational Permit
system to recognize customary and
traditional tribal practices; and (7)
included the subsistence halibut
program in the federal appeals process
at 50 CFR 679.43.
The Council revisited the postponed
amendments in October 2004, and took
final action on them in December 2004.
This action proposes implementing
regulations for the postponed
amendments. Specifically, this action
E:\FR\FM\14APP1.SGM
14APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 72 / Monday, April 14, 2008 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
proposes six changes to the subsistence
halibut regulations that would: (1)
revise the subsistence gear restrictions
in Kodiak and add seasonal gear and
vessel limits in Sitka Sound; (2) add the
village of Naukati to the list of eligible
subsistence halibut communities; (3)
implement a possession limit to
enhance enforcement; (4) revise the
definition of charter vessel; (5) revise
regulations regarding customary trade;
and (6) allow the use of special permits
within non-subsistence use areas by
tribes eligible for the permits.
Additional administrative revisions to
regulations include converting the gear
and harvest restrictions from text to
table format and revising language to
consistently refer to Sitka Sound, rather
than Sitka LAMP, and its defined area.
None of the proposed actions are
intended to change the amount of
halibut harvested for subsistence.
Information on alternatives considered
and rejected may be found in the RIR
and IRFA prepared for this action (see
ADDRESSES).
Subsistence Halibut Gear Restrictions
The Council recommended increasing
gear restrictions in two subareas of IPHC
Regulatory Areas 2C and 3A. In Area
3A, the Council recommended lowering
the maximum hook limit per vessel in
the Kodiak Road Zone and Chiniak Bay
(together referred to hereafter as Chiniak
Bay) from 90 to 60 hooks. In Area 2C,
the Council proposed additional
seasonal gear and harvest restrictions in
Sitka Sound. The Council recommended
each of these provisions to address
localized depletion concerns in those
subareas.
This proposed action would reduce
the allowable hook limit in Chiniak Bay
to no more than two times the per
person limit of 30, except when fishing
under a Ceremonial, Educational, or
Community Harvest Permit. If one
registered fisher is onboard the vessel,
the maximum number of hooks on the
gear set or retrieved in the course of
fishing would be 30. If two registered
fishers are onboard, the maximum
number of hooks on gear set or retrieved
in the course of fishing would be 60.
However, unlike other parts of Area 3A
that would be allowed up to 90 hooks
if three registered fishers are onboard, at
no time may the maximum number of
hooks on gear set or retrieved in the
course of fishing exceed 60 hooks per
vessel in Chiniak Bay, except that under
a Ceremonial, Educational, or
Community Harvest Permit the limit
would be 90 hooks per vessel.
Under this action, NMFS would
define Chiniak Bay based on the State
of Alaska’s definition of the Kodiak
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:10 Apr 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
Road Zone found at 05 AAC 64.005.
NMFS would define Chiniak Bay as all
waters bounded by the shoreline and
straight lines extending from Cape
Chiniak (57°37.22′ N. lat., 152°9.36′ W.
long.), to Buoy #1 at Williams Reef
(57°50.36′ N. lat., 152°8.82′ W. long.), to
East Cape on Spruce Island (57°54.89′
N. lat., 152°19.45′ W. long.), to
Termination Point on Kodiak Island
(57°51.31′ N. lat., 152°24.01′ W. long.),
and connecting to a line running
counterclockwise along the shoreline of
Kodiak Island to Cape Chiniak
(57°37.22′ N. lat., 152°9.36′ W. long.).
NMFS proposes this definition because
latitude and longitude reference points
do not vary and can be easily drawn on
paper and electronic charting systems.
The proposed area also includes the vast
majority of local small-vessel sport and
subsistence grounds historically fished
for halibut, while maintaining
consistency with the area targeted by
the Council’s proposed Kodiak Road
Zone recommendation.
Consistent with previous applications
of the Community Harvest Permit (CHP)
Program, the Council recommended
allowing the use of a CHP in Area 3A,
including Chiniak Bay, to mitigate the
proposed increased restrictions. The
CHP Program allows a community or
Alaska Native tribe to select individual
harvesters who may possess particular
expertise in halibut fishing to harvest
halibut on behalf of the community or
Alaska Native tribe. Possession of a CHP
in Area 3A would allow an eligible tribe
or community to use 30 hooks per
person up to a maximum of 90 hooks
per vessel.
The Council also recommended
additional gear restrictions and seasonal
periods for gear restrictions in Sitka
Sound to further address localized
depletion concerns. This proposed
action would reduce the allowable gear
from 30 hooks to 15 hooks per vessel
and prohibit power hauling during the
summer months from June 1 through
August 31. From September 1 through
May 31 gear restrictions would remain
at 30 hooks per vessel and power
hauling would be allowed.
The gear restrictions in this proposed
rule would apply only to gear in use by
eligible subsistence fishermen. By
applying the gear restrictions to gear
‘‘set or retrieved’’ from a vessel, the gear
restrictions apply only to gear actively
engaged in subsistence fishing for
halibut. A subsistence fisherman may
possess any amount of gear onboard the
vessel as long as that amount of gear
actively being used does not exceed the
prescribed limits. For instance, a box of
extra hooks stored onboard a vessel or
a fully rigged set of spare gear in a
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
20009
vessel would not count toward the
subsistence gear restriction because the
gear is not in use. This proposed rule
also intends to further clarify any
ambiguity in the gear restrictions by
converting the original text of the gear
restrictions to a table format. Because of
this conversion to a table format,
information in the regulatory text at
§ 300.65(h)(1)(i)(D) concerning the use
of setline gear in Sitka Sound would be
moved to § 300.65(e)(5).
Eligible Subsistence Halibut
Communities
Persons eligible to conduct
subsistence halibut fishing include (1)
residents of rural places with customary
and traditional uses of halibut and (2)
all identified members of federally
recognized Alaska Native tribes with a
finding of customary and traditional
uses of halibut. A list of rural
communities and Alaska Native tribes
eligible to fish for subsistence halibut
may be found at § 300.65(g).
The list of rural places recommended
by the Council and approved by the
Secretary was derived from customary
and traditional findings for halibut and
bottomfish made by the Alaska State
Board of Fisheries (Board) prior to the
Alaska Supreme Court decision,
McDowell v. State, 785 P.2d 1 (Alaska
1989). Following McDowell, State
regulations directed the Board to
determine whether each fish stock in
subsistence use areas of the State is
subject to customary and traditional
uses. Therefore, the customary and
traditional use determination process
does not focus on communities or areas
that conduct the use, but on the pattern
of use of a fish stock. Although the
Council engages in a community-based
approach, nothing prevents the Board
from nominating areas, such as remote
homesteads, for eligibility for
subsistence halibut.
The Council and Secretary retain
exclusive authority to recommend
changes to the list of rural places in
§ 300.65(g)(1). The Council initially
recognized that some rural communities
not explicitly named in the list may
seek a finding of customary and
traditional use of halibut, and
established a policy to include those
communities if customary and
traditional findings were made.
Residents who believed that their rural
place was incorrectly omitted from the
eligibility listing for rural places, or who
were seeking eligibility for the first time,
were encouraged to seek a customary
and traditional finding from the Board
before petitioning the Council.
In October 2003, the Board received
seven appeals from communities and
E:\FR\FM\14APP1.SGM
14APP1
20010
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 72 / Monday, April 14, 2008 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
individuals requesting positive
customary and traditional use findings
for halibut. The Board forwarded only
two proposals to the Council: Port
Tongass Village and Naukati. The
remaining petitions failed because the
petitioners were located within nonsubsistence use areas and did not fit the
stated criteria.
In December 2004, the Council
recommended a provision to include
Naukati as an eligible rural community
for subsistence halibut purposes based
on the Board’s recommendation. The
Council declined including Port
Tongass Village following testimony
and evidence that indicated the
proposed rural community consists of
only one individual. The Council
determined that this was an insufficient
number of residents to qualify as a
community. However, the Council
affirmed the Board’s determination that
Naukati is a rural community with
customary and traditional use of halibut
and recommended adding Naukati as a
rural community for subsistence halibut
purposes consistent with the Council’s
policy to include communities for
which customary and traditional
findings are made by the Board.
Therefore, under this proposed rule,
NMFS would add only Naukati to the
list of eligible communities found at
§ 300.65(g)(1).
Subsistence Halibut Harvest
Restrictions
In general, eligible subsistence
fishermen may retain up to 20 halibut
per day as a daily bag limit, except in
Area 2C where only 20 halibut per
vessel per day may be retained, and
Areas 4C, 4D, and 4E where no limits
on retention apply. In October 2003, the
IPHC staff suggested that subsistence
regulations allowed a substantial
increase in harvest that necessitated
more effective monitoring. The IPHC
specifically expressed concern with
overall enforcement of the subsistence
program and the allowable possession of
halibut. The IPHC identified that
enforcement officers currently possess
no means to verify time on the water for
subsistence halibut fishermen who
possess more than one daily bag limit,
thereby hampering accurate accounting
of halibut removals. The Council
subsequently recommended
implementing a possession limit to
restrict potential abuses of the daily bag
limit and enhance enforcement of daily
harvest limits.
Based on the recommendation of the
IPHC, the Council recommended that
the proposed possession limit apply to
Areas 2C, 3A, and 3B, which have
experienced increased fishing effort due
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:10 Apr 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
to higher population density. The
Council determined that no possession
limit was necessary for Areas 4A and 4B
because those areas were not
experiencing corresponding increases in
fishing effort and population density.
This proposed action would
implement a possession limit of one
daily bag limit for Areas 2C, 3A, and 3B.
For instance, current regulations restrict
a fisherman in Area 2C to 20 halibut per
vessel per day, thus that fisherman’s
possession limit would be equal to his
or her daily bag limit. Likewise, current
regulations restrict a fisherman in Areas
3A and 3B to 20 halibut per person per
day, so that fisherman’s possession limit
would be equal to his or her daily bag
limit. Bag limits within Sitka Sound in
Area 2C also would be subject to this
action. Therefore, the possession limit
within Sitka Sound would be 10 halibut
per vessel from September 1 to May 31
and 5 halibut per vessel from June 1
through August 31. This proposed
action would not apply in Areas 4A and
4B. This proposed action would have no
effect in Areas 4C, 4D, or 4E because no
daily bag limit exists in those areas.
This proposed action also would have
no effect on the retention limits allowed
for CHPs, Ceremonial Permits, or
Educational Permits.
Charter Vessel Prohibition
Current regulations prohibit the
retention of subsistence halibut
harvested using a charter vessel, which
is defined at § 300.61 as ‘‘a vessel used
for hire in sport fishing for halibut, but
not including a vessel without a hired
operator.’’ NOAA Enforcement
expressed difficulty enforcing the
prohibition under the current definition
because of problems associated with
determining whether a vessel operator is
‘‘for hire.’’ The Council subsequently
clarified that the prohibition was meant
only to prohibit subsistence fishers from
hiring someone to take them subsistence
fishing, but not to prohibit the use of
vessels registered as charter vessels from
being used for subsistence fishing.
NOAA Enforcement recommended
revising the definition of charter vessel
to improve enforcement of the
prohibition consistent with the
Council’s intent.
The Council adopted NOAA
Enforcement’s recommendation and
provided additional guidance to ensure
the prohibition continued to restrict
subsistence fishing on charter vessels. In
December 2004, the Council
recommended revising the definition of
charter vessel to ‘‘a vessel registered as
such with the Alaska Department of
Fish and Game.’’ NOAA Enforcement
believed this definition would improve
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the identification of vessels used
illegally as charter vessels for
subsistence halibut and the enforcement
of other charter vessel restrictions.
NOAA Enforcement has since
recommended using the term ‘‘sport
fishing guide vessel’’ in the regulatory
definition for a charter vessel because
this is the term used in State of Alaska
regulations at 05 AAC 75.077.
The Council further recommended,
and NMFS proposes, a provision that
would allow a charter vessel to be used
for subsistence halibut fishing, but use
for that purpose must be restricted to
the owner of record as indicated on the
State of Alaska vessel registration,
provided the owner is eligible to fish for
subsistence halibut, and the owner’s
immediate family. This provision would
allow qualified subsistence halibut
fishers who also engage in charter
fishing to use their vessels to conduct
subsistence fishing, but limit such
fishing to the vessel owner and his or
her immediate family. The Council
recommended not defining ‘‘immediate
family’’ in regulation.
The Council recommended, and
NMFS proposes, the prohibition of the
use of a charter vessel for subsistence
halibut fishing while charter clients are
onboard the vessel and prohibiting the
transfer of subsistence halibut to charter
clients to prevent abuses of the
proposed charter vessel allowance. The
prohibition against subsistence fishing
while charter clients are onboard would
prevent the vessel owner or any other
person onboard the vessel from
engaging in subsistence fishing at any
time while a charter client is onboard
the vessel. This would preclude the use
of any gear not classified as sport fishing
gear or retaining any halibut in excess
of the sport limits while charter clients
are onboard any vessel. Additionally, a
prohibition of the transfer of subsistence
halibut to charter clients would apply at
all times, meaning that at no time may
subsistence halibut be provided by a
charter operator to any person who has
chartered a sportfishing trip with that
charter operator.
Customary and Traditional Trade
Restrictions
Current regulations at § 300.66(j)
specify that it is unlawful for any person
to retain or possess subsistence halibut
for commercial purposes; cause
subsistence halibut to be sold, bartered,
or otherwise entered into commerce; or
solicit exchange of subsistence halibut
for commercial purposes, except that a
qualified subsistence fisherman may
engage in the customary trade of
subsistence halibut through monetary
exchange of no more than $400 per year.
E:\FR\FM\14APP1.SGM
14APP1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 72 / Monday, April 14, 2008 / Proposed Rules
The Council originally intended that the
$400 annual limit would allow a person
who receives subsistence halibut from
an eligible subsistence halibut
fisherman, to help defer the donating
fisherman’s costs of harvesting
subsistence halibut.
The Council was concerned that
continuing the $400 customary trade
limit would confound Council intent by
allowing de facto ‘‘sale’’ of subsistence
halibut outside customary and
traditional trade. In June 2003, the
Council’s Enforcement Committee
reviewed issues related to customary
trade and determined that (1) despite
the Council’s intent to not create a new
commercial fishery, current regulations
essentially allow the sale of subsistence
halibut up to the $400 annual limit; (2)
the $400 annual limit lacks
enforceability because enforcement
officers cannot easily distinguish
between sale and customary and
traditional exchange for cash; and (3)
current regulations do not clearly
prohibit advertising and solicitation for
commercial sale. The Enforcement
Committee recommended the Council
revise the customary trade restrictions
to meet the original intent of allowing
customary and traditional trade.
On the suggestion of the Enforcement
Committee, the Council recommended
revising the regulations to eliminate
customary trade for cash. The Council
additionally determined that the
identification of a dollar amount for the
allowance of customary trade in the
regulations resulted in some subsistence
users ‘‘selling’’ halibut to other
subsistence users outside of customary
and traditional practices, and that the
dollar amount effectively served as a
target rather than a limit. NOAA
Enforcement also reported subsistence
halibut illegally entering the
commercial market, due in part to the
difficulty of enforcing the $400 annual
limit.
This proposed action would eliminate
the $400 customary trade limit and
restrict any monetary exchange for
subsistence halibut specifically to
reimbursement of actual trip expenses
directly related to the harvest of
subsistence halibut. Actual trip
expenses would be limited to ice, bait,
food, or fuel only. Additional
restrictions would be applied separately
to rural community residents and
Alaska Native tribal members.
Under this proposed action, persons
who qualify as rural residents under
§ 300.65(g)(1) and hold a subsistence
halibut registration certificate (SHARC)
in their name under § 300.65(i) may be
reimbursed only by residents of the
same rural community listed on his or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:10 Apr 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
her subsistence halibut registration
certificate. For example, a rural
community resident in Hoonah may be
reimbursed for actual trip expenses
directly related to subsistence halibut
fishing by another resident of Hoonah
but may not be reimbursed by a resident
of Sitka. The Council proposed this
restriction as an additional measure to
discourage the entry of subsistence
halibut into commerce.
Additionally, under this proposed
action, persons who qualify as Alaska
Native tribal members under
§ 300.65(g)(2) and hold a SHARC in
their name under § 300.65(i) would be
eligible for reimbursement only from an
Alaska Native tribe or its members. For
example, a tribal SHARC holder from
the Kenaitze Indian Tribe may be
reimbursed by a member of the Gwichin
Athabascan Indian Tribe. However,
persons possessing a SHARC designated
as tribal would be ineligible to receive
reimbursement from anyone other than
another Alaska Native tribe or its
members.
Special Permits in Non-subsistence
Areas
Generally, eligible persons may
harvest subsistence halibut in all
Convention waters in and off Alaska
except for the four designated nonsubsistence marine areas: the Ketchikan
non-subsistence marine waters area, the
Juneau non-subsistence marine waters
area, the Anchorage-Matsu-Kenai nonsubsistence marine waters area, and the
Valdez non-subsistence marine waters
area (§ 300.65(h)(3) and Figures 2–5 to
subpart E).
In December 2004, the Council
recommended allowing the use of
Ceremonial Permits and Educational
Permits in non-subsistence marine areas
by tribes whose traditional fishing
grounds are located within Areas 2C
and 3A. This proposed action would
allow twelve Alaska Native tribes whose
traditional fishing grounds fall within
Areas 2C and 3A to conduct subsistence
halibut fishing in areas currently
designated as non-subsistence marine
areas. Therefore, if persons on a vessel
possess a Ceremonial Permit or an
Educational Permit, they would be
allowed to conduct subsistence fishing
in the non-subsistence marine areas
subject to other existing regulations.
Use of Ceremonial Permits and
Educational Permits within nonsubsistence marine areas would remain
subject to gear and harvest restrictions
for those permits consistent with the
IPHC regulatory area in which they are
used. Ceremonial Permits and
Educational Permits allow Alaska
Native tribes in Areas 2C and 3A as
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
20011
listed in § 300.65(g)(2) to harvest up to
25 halibut per permit. Ceremonial
Permits and Educational Permits in nonsubsistence marine areas maintain the
same gear limitations as those required
when fishing under a SHARC in Areas
2C and 3A (i.e., 30 hooks per vessel in
Area 2C and 30 hooks per person or up
to 90 hooks per vessel in Area 3A).
Ceremonial Permits and Educational
Permits also have unique application
and reporting requirements (§ 300.65(j)
and (k)).
Classification
The NMFS Assistant Administrator
has determined that this proposed rule
is necessary for the conservation and
management of the halibut fishery and
that it is consistent with the Halibut Act
and other applicable law, subject to
further consideration after public
comment.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
This proposed rule also complies with
the Secretary’s authority under the
Halibut Act to implement management
measures for the halibut fishery.
An initial regulatory flexibility
analysis (IRFA) was prepared, as
required by section 603 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The
IRFA describes the economic impact
this proposed rule, if adopted, would
have on small entities. A description of
the action, why it is being considered,
and the legal basis for this action are
contained at the beginning of this
section in the preamble and in the
SUMMARY section of the preamble. A
summary of the analysis follows. Copies
of this analysis are available from the
Council or NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
This proposed rule would implement
six actions to amend the subsistence
halibut regulations: (1) revise the
subsistence gear restrictions in Kodiak
and add seasonal gear and vessel limits
in the Sitka Sound area; (2) add the
village of Naukati to the list of eligible
subsistence halibut communities; (3)
implement a possession limit equal to
one daily bag limit to enhance
enforcement; (4) revise the definition of
charter vessel; (5) revise regulations
regarding customary trade; and (6) allow
the use of special permits within nonsubsistence use areas by tribes eligible
for the permits. Only actions 1 and 6
would directly regulate ‘‘small entities,’’
as defined by the RFA. The remaining
four actions are not addressed because
they affect individuals, rather than
‘‘entities,’’ as defined by RFA. All
attributable impacts on directly
regulated small entities, accruing from
either action, appear to be beneficial.
E:\FR\FM\14APP1.SGM
14APP1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
20012
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 72 / Monday, April 14, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Action 1 would directly regulate
Alaska Native tribes, or governmental
entities in the absence of a tribe, that are
eligible to participate in the subsistence
halibut program off Kodiak and Chiniak
Bay. Action 1 would govern nine Alaska
Native tribes. Action 6 would affect
thirteen Alaska Native tribes, but no
governmental entities.
It is NMFS policy to consider only
adverse impacts when preparing an
IRFA, consistent with the intent of
Congress to minimize effects on small
entities. No such adverse impacts
appear to be associated with Actions 1
and 6. However, detailed information
and empirical data about the operational
structures, strategies, and fiscal
conditions of the various Alaska Native
tribes, which are likely to be directly
regulated by the proposed actions, are
not presently available to the analysts to
support preparation of a factual basis
upon which to certify, under RFA
provisions. Therefore, the Council
prepared an IRFA to fulfill the
requirements of the RFA, despite the
high probability that the actions will not
have a substantial adverse effect on a
substantial number of small entities, as
these terms are defined under the RFA.
Proposed actions 1 and 6 aim to
enhance management of the subsistence
halibut fishery as it pertains to use by
Alaska Native tribes for the purpose of
recognizing and appropriately
accommodating subsistence practices.
These actions are taken under the
authority of the Northern Pacific Halibut
Act of 1982.
The principal decisions in the
preferred alternatives for actions 1 and
6 address changes to (1) gear limits and
the use of Community Harvest Permits
(CHPs) by Alaska Native tribes in
Kodiak and Chiniak Bay, and seasonal
gear and vessel limits in Sitka Sound;
and (2) fishing in non-subsistence use
areas. The preferred alternatives to
implement CHPs for Alaska Native
tribes in Kodiak and Chiniak Bay (CHPs
are not allowed in Sitka Sound) under
action 1, and to allow ceremonial and
educational permits to be used by
Alaska Native tribes in non-subsistence
use areas under action 6, directly
regulate small entities.
The Council addressed multiple
alternatives for each action under the
RFA. Under action 1, the Council
analyzed three alternatives: (1) no
action; (2) change gear restrictions and
annual limits in Kodiak, Prince William
Sound, Cook Inlet, and the Sitka LAMP;
and (3) change gear restrictions and
annual limits only in Kodiak and the
Sitka LAMP. The Council selected
alternative 3 as the preferred alternative
for action 1. For action 6, the Council
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:10 Apr 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
analyzed three alternatives: (1) no
action; (2) allow the use of CHPs,
educational permits, and ceremonial
permits in non-subsistence use areas by
tribes whose traditional fishing grounds
are located within IPHC Areas 2C and
3A, with the associated daily bag limit;
and (3) allow the use of educational
permits and ceremonial permits, but not
CHPs, in non-subsistence use areas by
tribes whose traditional fishing grounds
are located within IPHC Areas 2C and
3A, with the associated daily bag limit.
The Council selected alternative 3 as the
preferred alternative for action 6.
Based on the best available scientific
data and information, the IRFA
(including the RIR) reveals that none of
the significant alternatives to the
proposed action, other than the
preferred alternatives, have the potential
to accomplish the objectives of the
Council consistent with the Halibut Act,
the RFA, and other applicable statutes,
and minimize the adverse economic
impacts of the proposed rule on directly
regulated small entities.
This proposed rule contains
collection-of-information requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) and which have been approved
by OMB. These collections are listed by
control number.
OMB Control Number 0648–0460
Public reporting burden is estimated
to average ten minutes for Subsistence
halibut registration certificate (SHARC)
for rural or individual use and ten
minutes for SHARC for tribal use.
OMB Control Number 0648–0512
Public reporting burden for a
Subsistence Halibut Special Permit
Application for ceremonial harvest,
education harvest, or community
harvest is estimated to average ten
minutes per response.
These estimates include the time for
reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection
of information. Send comments
regarding this burden estimate, or any
other aspect of this data collection,
including suggestions for reducing the
burden, to NMFS (see ADDRESSES) and
by e-mail to DavidlRostker@omb.eop.
gov, or fax to 202–395–7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, and no person shall be
subject to penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
NMFS is not aware of any other
Federal rules that would duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with these actions.
Executive Order 13175 of November
6, 2000 (25 U.S.C. 450 note), the
Executive Memorandum of April 29,
1994 (25 U.S.C. 450 note), and the
American Indian and Alaska Native
Policy of the U.S. Department of
Commerce (March 30, 1995) outline the
responsibilities of the National Marine
Fisheries Service in matters affecting
tribal interests. Section 161 of Public
Law 108–199 (188 Stat 452), as
amended by section 518 of Public Law
108–447 (118 Stat 3267), extends the
consultation requirements of Executive
Order 13175 to Alaska Native
corporations.
Consultations with the Alaska Native
Subsistence Halibut Working Group,
under Executive Order 13175, resulted
in recommendations to allow the use of
special permits in non-subsistence use
areas. NMFS will contact tribal
governments and Alaska Native
corporations which may be affected by
the proposed action, provide them with
a copy of this proposed rule, and offer
them an opportunity to consult.
List of Subjects for 50 CFR Part 300
Pacific halibut fisheries, Alaska,
Alaska Natives, Fisheries,
Recordkeeping and reporting
requirements.
Dated: April 8 2008.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Operations, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR part 300, subpart E as follows:
PART 300—INTERNATIONAL
FISHERIES REGULATIONS
Subpart E—Pacific Halibut Fisheries
1. The authority citation for part 300,
subpart E continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773–773k.
2. In § 300.61 add definitions of
‘‘Chiniak Bay’’ and ‘‘Power hauling’’ in
alphabetical order and revise the
definition of ‘‘Charter vessel’’ to read as
follows:
§ 300.61
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Charter vessel means a vessel
registered as a sport fishing guide vessel
with the Alaska Department of Fish and
Game.
Chiniak Bay means all waters
bounded by the shoreline and straight
lines connecting the coordinates in the
order listed:
E:\FR\FM\14APP1.SGM
14APP1
20013
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 72 / Monday, April 14, 2008 / Proposed Rules
north from Cape Chiniak (57°37.22′ N.
lat., 152°9.36′ W. long.);
to Buoy #1 at Williams Reef (57°50.36′
N. lat., 152°8.82′ W. long.);
to East Cape on Spruce Island
(57°54.89′ N. lat., 152°19.45′ W. long.);
to Termination Point on Kodiak
Island (57°51.31′ N. lat., 152°24.01′ W.
long.); and connecting to a line running
counterclockwise along the shoreline of
Kodiak Island to Cape Chiniak
(57°37.22′ N. lat., 152°9.36′ W. long.).
*
*
*
*
*
Power hauling means using
electrically, hydraulically, or
mechanically powered devices or
attachments or other assisting devises or
attachments to deploy and retrieve
fishing gear. Power hauling does not
include the use of hand power, a hand
powered crank, a fishing rod, a
downrigger, or a hand troll gurdy.
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 300.65:
A. Revise paragraphs (e)(1)(ii)
introductory text, (h)(1)(i), (h)(2), (j)
introductory text, (j)(1)(ii), (j)(1)(iii),
(j)(3)(i) introductory text, (j)(3)(i)(A),
(k)(3)(i), and (k)(3)(ii).
B. Add paragraph (e)(5).
C. In paragraph (g)(1) in the table
entitled ‘‘Halibut Regulatory Area 2C’’
an entry for ‘‘Naukati’’ is added in
alphabetical order.
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
§ 300.65 Catch sharing plan and domestic
management measures in waters in and off
Alaska.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) With respect to paragraphs (e)(3),
(e)(4), and (e)(5) of this section, that part
of the Commission regulatory area 2C
that is enclosed on the north and east:
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Setline gear may not be used in a
4 nm radius extending south from Low
Island at 57°00.70′ N. lat., 135°36.57′ W.
long. within Sitka Sound, as defined in
paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section, from
June 1 through August 31.
*
*
*
*
*
Regulatory Area
2C (Except Sitka Sound)
(g) * * *
(1) * * *
Halibut Regulatory Area 2C
Rural Community
Organized Entity
*******
Naukati
Municipality
*******
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Subsistence fishing gear set or
retrieved from a vessel while engaged in
subsistence fishing for halibut must not
have more than the allowable hooks per
vessel, or per personregistered in
accordance with paragraph (i) of this
section and aboard the vessel,
whichever is less, according to the
regulatory area and permit type
indicated in the following table:
Permit Type
Gear Restrictions
30 hooks per vessel
Ceremonial Permit
30 hooks per vessel
Educational Permit
30 hooks per vessel
Community Harvest Permit
30 hooks per person onboard up to 90 hooks
SHARC
Sitka Sound
SHARC
September 1 through May 31: 30 hooks per vessel
June 1 through August 31: 15 hooks per vessel; no
power hauling
Ceremonial Permit
September 1 through May 31: 30 hooks per vessel
June 1 through August 31: fishing under Ceremonial
Permit not allowed
Educational Permit
30 hooks per vessel
Community Harvest Permit
fishing under Community Harvest Permit not allowed
SHARC
30 hooks per person onboard up to 90 hooks per vessel
Ceremonial Permit
30 hooks per person onboard
Educational Permit
30 hooks per person onboard up to 90 hooks per vessel
Community Harvest Permit
30 hooks per person onboard up to 90 hooks per vessel
SHARC
30 hooks per person onboard up to 90 hooks per vessel
Ceremonial Permit
30 hooks per person onboard up to 90 hooks per vessel
Educational Permit
30 hooks per person onboard up to 90 hooks per vessel
Community Harvest Permit
30 hooks per person onboard up to 90 hooks per vessel
3B
SHARC
30 hooks per person onboard up to 90 hooks per vessel
4A and 4B
SHARC
30 hooks per person onboard up to 90 hooks per vessel
4C, 4D, and 4E
SHARC
no hook limit
3A (Except Chiniak Bay)
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Chiniak Bay
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:10 Apr 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\14APP1.SGM
14APP1
20014
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 72 / Monday, April 14, 2008 / Proposed Rules
*
*
*
*
*
(2) The retention of subsistence
halibut is limited per person eligible to
conduct subsistence fishing for halibut
Regulatory Area
2C (Except Sitka Sound)
and onboard the vessel according to the
following table:
Permit Type
Retention Limits
20 halibut per day per vessel and in possession
Ceremonial Permit
25 halibut per permit
Educational Permit
25 halibut per permit
Community Harvest Permit
no daily or possession limit
SHARC
Sitka Sound
SHARC
September 1 through May 31: 10 halibut per day per
vessel and in possession
June 1 through August 31: 5 halibut per day per vessel
and in possession
Ceremonial Permit
September 1 through May 31: 25 halibut per permit
June 1 through August 31: fishing under Ceremonial
Permit not allowed
Educational Permit
25 halibut per permit
Community Harvest Permit
fishing under Community Harvest Permit not allowed
SHARC
20 halibut per person per day and in possession
Ceremonial Permit
25 halibut per permit
Educational Permit
25 halibut per permit
Community Harvest Permit
no daily or possession limit
3B
SHARC
20 halibut per person per day and in possession
4A and 4B
SHARC
20 halibut per person per day; no possession limit
4C, 4D, and 4E
SHARC
no daily or possession limit
3A, including Chiniak Bay
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(j) Community Harvest Permit (CHP).
An Area 2C or Area 3A community or
Alaska Native tribe listed in paragraphs
(g)(1) or (g)(2) of this section may apply
for a CHP, which allows a community
or Alaska Native tribe to appoint one or
more individuals from its respective
community or Alaska Native tribe to
harvest subsistence halibut from a single
vessel under reduced gear and harvest
restrictions. The CHP consists of a
harvest log and up to five laminated
permit cards. A CHP is a permit subject
to regulation under § 679.4(a) of this
title.
(1) * * *
(ii) NMFS will issue a CHP to a
community in Area 2C or Area 3A only
if:
(A) The applying community is listed
as eligible in Area 2C or Area 3A
according to paragraph (g)(1) of this
section; and
(B) No Alaska Native tribe listed in
paragraph (g)(2) of this section exists in
that community.
(iii) NMFS will issue a CHP to an
Alaska Native tribe in Area 2C or Area
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:10 Apr 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
3A only if the applying tribe is listed as
eligible in Area 2C or Area 3A according
to paragraph (g)(2) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
(i) In Area 2C or Area 3A, except that
a CHP may not be used:
(A) Within Sitka Sound as defined in
paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section (see
Figure 1 to this subpart E); or
*
*
*
*
*
(k) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) In Area 3A;
(ii) In Area 2C, except a Ceremonial
Permit may not be used within Sitka
Sound from June 1 through August 31;
*
*
*
*
*
4. In § 300.66:
A. Redesignate paragraphs (j) through
(m) as paragraphs (k) through (n),
respectively.
B. Revise paragraph (i) and newly
redesignated paragraph (k).
C. Add new paragraph (j).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 300.66
Prohibitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) Fish for subsistence halibut from a
charter vessel or retain subsistence
halibut onboard a charter vessel if
anyone other than the owner of record,
as indicated on the State of Alaska
vessel registration, or the owner’s
immediate family is aboard the charter
vessel and unless each person engaging
in subsistence fishing onboard the
charter vessel holds a subsistence
halibut registration certificate in the
person’s name pursuant to § 300.65(i)
and abides by the gear and harvest
restrictions found at § 300.65(h).
(j) Transfer subsistence halibut to
charter vessel anglers.
(k) Retain or possess subsistence
halibut for commercial purposes; cause
subsistence halibut to be sold, bartered,
or otherwise entered into commerce; or
solicit exchange of subsistence halibut
for commercial purposes, except that a
person who qualified to conduct
subsistence fishing for halibut under
§ 300.65(g), and who holds a subsistence
halibut registration certificate in the
person’s name under § 300.65(i), may be
E:\FR\FM\14APP1.SGM
14APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 72 / Monday, April 14, 2008 / Proposed Rules
reimbursed for the expense of fishing for
subsistence halibut under the following
conditions:
(1) Persons who qualify as rural
residents under § 300.65(g)(1) and hold
a subsistence halibut registration
certificate in the persons’s name under
§ 300.65(i) may be reimbursed for actual
expenses directly related to subsistence
fishing for halibut, including only ice,
bait, food, or fuel, by residents of the
same rural community listed on the
person’s subsistence halibut registration
certificate; or
(2) Persons who qualify as Alaska
Native tribal members under
§ 300.65(g)(2) and hold a subsistence
halibut registration certificate in the
person’s name under § 300.65(i) may be
reimbursed for actual expenses directly
related to subsistence fishing for
halibut, including only ice, bait, food, or
fuel, by any Alaska Native tribe or its
members.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–7902 Filed 4–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No.080326475–8477–01]
RIN 0648–XG22
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries;
Annual Specifications
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes a regulation
to implement the annual harvest
guideline (HG) for Pacific sardine in the
U.S. exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off
the Pacific coast for the fishing season
of January 1, 2008, through December
31, 2008. This HG has been determined
according to the regulations
implementing the Coastal Pelagic
Species (CPS) Fishery Management Plan
(FMP) and establishes allowable harvest
levels for Pacific sardine off the Pacific
coast.
DATES: Comments must be received by
May 14, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this proposed rule identified by
0648–XG22 by any of the following
methods:• Electronic Submissions:
Submit all electronic public comments
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:10 Apr 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
via the Federal eRulemaking Portal
https://www.regulations.gov
• Mail: Rodney R. McInnis, Regional
Administrator, Southwest Region,
NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite
4200, Long Beach,
CA 90802.
• Fax: (562)980–4047
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments. Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
PDF file formats only.
Copies of the report ‘‘Assessment of
Pacific Sardine Stock for U.S.
Management in 2008’’ may be obtained
from the Southwest Regional Office (see
the Mailing address above).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joshua Lindsay, Southwest Region,
NMFS, (562) 980–4034.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CPS
FMP, which was implemented by
publication of the final rule in the
Federal Register on December 15, 1999
(64 FR 69888), divides management unit
species into two categories: actively
managed and monitored. Harvest
guidelines for actively managed species
(Pacific sardine and Pacific mackerel)
are based on formulas applied to current
biomass estimates. Biomass estimates
are not calculated for species that are
only monitored (jack mackerel, northern
anchovy, and market squid).
During public meetings each year, the
biomass for each actively managed
species within the CPS FMP is
presented to the Pacific Fishery
Management Council’s (Council) Coastal
Pelagic Species Management Team
(Team) and the Council’s Coastal
Pelagic Species Advisory Subpanel
(Subpanel). At that time, the biomass,
the acceptable biological catch (ABC)
and the status of the fisheries are
reviewed and discussed. This
information is then presented to the
Council along with HG
recommendations and comments from
the Team and Subpanel. Following
review by the Council and after hearing
public comment, the Council makes its
HG recommendation to NMFS. The
annual HG is published in the Federal
Register as close as practicable to the
start of the fishing season.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
20015
For actively managed CPS stocks, full
assessments and the accompanying
Stock Assessment Review (STAR)
process typically occur every third year
and were last completed in 2004.
Therefore, for this 2007 cycle, a full
assessment for Pacific sardine was
conducted and reviewed by a STAR
Panel in La Jolla, California, September
18–21, 2007. This assessment produced
an estimated biomass of 832,706 mt.
Applying this biomass number to the
harvest control rule in the FMP
produces an acceptable biological catch
(ABC) for the 2008 fishery of 89,093
metric tons (mt).
In November, the Council held a
public meeting in San Diego, California
(72 FR 59256) during which time the
Team, Subpanel, CPS Subcommitee of
the Scientific and Statistical Committee
(SSC) and the Council reviewed the
current stock assessment, biomass
numbers and ABC. Following their
review of the assessment, associated
biomass and ABC and after hearing
reports by the SSC, Team and Subpanel
the Council adopted an ABC or HG of
89,093 mt for the 2008 fishing year. This
ABC is 42 percent less than the ABC/HG
adopted by the Council for the 2007
fishing season.
The Pacific sardine HG is apportioned
based on the following allocation
scheme established by Amendment 11
(71 FR 36999, June 29, 2006) to the CPS
FMP: 35 percent is allocated coastwide
on January 1; 40 percent, plus any
portion not harvested from the initial
allocation is reallocated coastwide on
July 1; and on September 15 the
remaining 25 percent, plus any portion
not harvested from earlier allocations is
released. If the total HG or these
apportionment levels for Pacific sardine
are reached at any time, the Pacific
sardine fishery will be closed via
appropriate rulemaking until it re-opens
either per the allocation scheme or the
beginning of the next fishing season.
The Regional Administrator shall
publish a notice in the Federal Register
the date of the closure of the directed
fishery for Pacific sardine.
Based on recommendations by the
Team, and the potential that seasonal
allocation totals may be attained during
the 2008 fishing year due to the
decrease in the HG, the Council also
adopted a set aside of 8,909 mt (10
percent of the ABC). Implementation of
the set aside would establish a directed
harvest fishery of 80,184 mt and an
incidental fishery of 8,909 mt. This
incidental fishery would allow for
incidental landings of Pacific sardine in
other fisheries and prevent the closure
of such fisheries, particularly other CPS
fisheries, if a seasonal directed fishery
E:\FR\FM\14APP1.SGM
14APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 72 (Monday, April 14, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 20008-20015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-7902]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 300
[Docket No. 080310411-7566-01]
RIN 0648-AU14
Pacific Halibut Fisheries; Subsistence Fishing
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations to amend the subsistence fishery
rules for Pacific halibut in waters in and off Alaska. These
regulations are necessary to address subsistence halibut management
concerns in densely populated areas. This action is intended to support
the conservation and management provisions of the Northern Pacific
Halibut Act of 1982.
DATES: Comments must be received no later than May 14, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Sue Salveson, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region, NMFS,
Attn: Ellen Sebastian. You may submit comments, identified by ``RIN
0648-AU14'' by any one of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal website at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Mail: P. O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802.
Fax: (907) 586-7557.
Hand delivery to the Federal Building: 709 West 9th
Street, Room 420A, Juneau, Alaska.
All comments received are a part of the public record and will be
posted to https://www.regulations.gov without change. All Personal
Identifying Information (e.g., name, address) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit Confidential
Business Information or otherwise sensitive or protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous comments. Attachments to electronic
comments must be in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
portable document file (pdf) formats to be accepted.
Copies of the Categorical Exclusion (CE), Regulatory Impact Review
(RIR), and Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) prepared for
this action, as well as the environmental assessment (EA) prepared for
the original subsistence halibut action (68 FR 18145; April 15, 2003)
may be obtained from the North Pacific Fishery Management Council
(Council) at 605 West 4th, Suite 306, Anchorage, Alaska 99501-2252,
907-271-2809; by mail from NMFS, Alaska Region, P. O. Box 21668,
Juneau, AK 99802-1668, Attn: Ellen Sebastian, Records Officer; in
person at NMFS, Alaska Region, 709 West 9th Street, Room 420A, Juneau,
Alaska; or via the Internet at the NMFS Alaska Region website at http:/
/www.fakr.noaa.gov.
Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other
aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this
proposed rule may be submitted to NMFS at the above address and by e-
mail to David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax to 202-395-7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Becky Carls, 907-586-7228 or
becky.carls@noaa.gov, or Peggy Murphy, 907-586-7228 or
peggy.murphy@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Need for Action
Management of the Pacific halibut (hereafter halibut) fishery in
and off Alaska is based on an international agreement between Canada
and the United States. This agreement, entitled the ``Convention
between the United States of America and Canada for the Preservation of
the Halibut Fishery of the Northern Pacific Ocean and Bering Sea''
(Convention), was signed at Ottawa, Canada, on March 2, 1953, and
amended by the ``Protocol Amending the Convention,'' signed at
Washington, D.C., March 29, 1979. The Convention, administered by the
International Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC), is given effect in the
United States by the Northern Pacific Halibut Act of 1982 (Halibut
Act).
The IPHC promulgates regulations pursuant to the Convention. The
IPHC's regulations are subject to approval by the Secretary of State
with concurrence from the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary). After
approval by the Secretary of State and the Secretary, the IPHC
regulations are published in the Federal Register as annual management
measures pursuant to 50 CFR 300.62. NMFS published the IPHC's current
annual management measures on March 7, 2008 (73 FR 12280).
The Halibut Act also authorizes the North Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council) to develop halibut fishery regulations,
including limited access regulations, in its geographic area of concern
that would apply to nationals or vessels of the United States (Halibut
Act, section 773(c)). Such an action by the Council is limited to only
those regulations that are in addition to, and not in conflict with,
IPHC regulations. Council-developed regulations must be approved and
implemented by the Secretary. Any allocation of halibut fishing
privileges must be fair and equitable and consistent with other
applicable Federal law. The Council used its authority under the
Halibut Act to recommend a subsistence halibut program in October 2000
to recognize and manage the subsistence fishery for halibut.
The Secretary approved the Council's recommended subsistence
halibut program and published implementing regulations on April 15,
2003 (68 FR 18145), and codified the program in 50 CFR part 300-subpart
E, authorizing a subsistence fishery for halibut in Convention waters
off Alaska. In April 2002, the Council proposed a suite of amendments
to its original subsistence halibut program while postponing several
proposed amendments to be included in a separate action. Regulations
implementing the initial suite of amendments to the original
subsistence halibut program were published on April 1, 2005 (70 FR
16742). These regulations (1) changed the boundaries of the Anchorage/
Matsu/Kenai non-subsistence area; (2) eliminated gear restrictions in
Areas 4C, 4D, and 4E; (3) increased gear and harvest restrictions in
Area 2C; (4) allowed retention of legal-sized subsistence halibut with
Community Development Quota halibut in Areas 4C, 4D, and 4E; (5)
created a Community Harvest Permit (CHP) system to mitigate increased
gear and harvest restrictions in affected areas; (6) created a
Ceremonial and Educational Permit system to recognize customary and
traditional tribal practices; and (7) included the subsistence halibut
program in the federal appeals process at 50 CFR 679.43.
The Council revisited the postponed amendments in October 2004, and
took final action on them in December 2004. This action proposes
implementing regulations for the postponed amendments. Specifically,
this action
[[Page 20009]]
proposes six changes to the subsistence halibut regulations that would:
(1) revise the subsistence gear restrictions in Kodiak and add seasonal
gear and vessel limits in Sitka Sound; (2) add the village of Naukati
to the list of eligible subsistence halibut communities; (3) implement
a possession limit to enhance enforcement; (4) revise the definition of
charter vessel; (5) revise regulations regarding customary trade; and
(6) allow the use of special permits within non-subsistence use areas
by tribes eligible for the permits. Additional administrative revisions
to regulations include converting the gear and harvest restrictions
from text to table format and revising language to consistently refer
to Sitka Sound, rather than Sitka LAMP, and its defined area. None of
the proposed actions are intended to change the amount of halibut
harvested for subsistence. Information on alternatives considered and
rejected may be found in the RIR and IRFA prepared for this action (see
ADDRESSES).
Subsistence Halibut Gear Restrictions
The Council recommended increasing gear restrictions in two
subareas of IPHC Regulatory Areas 2C and 3A. In Area 3A, the Council
recommended lowering the maximum hook limit per vessel in the Kodiak
Road Zone and Chiniak Bay (together referred to hereafter as Chiniak
Bay) from 90 to 60 hooks. In Area 2C, the Council proposed additional
seasonal gear and harvest restrictions in Sitka Sound. The Council
recommended each of these provisions to address localized depletion
concerns in those subareas.
This proposed action would reduce the allowable hook limit in
Chiniak Bay to no more than two times the per person limit of 30,
except when fishing under a Ceremonial, Educational, or Community
Harvest Permit. If one registered fisher is onboard the vessel, the
maximum number of hooks on the gear set or retrieved in the course of
fishing would be 30. If two registered fishers are onboard, the maximum
number of hooks on gear set or retrieved in the course of fishing would
be 60. However, unlike other parts of Area 3A that would be allowed up
to 90 hooks if three registered fishers are onboard, at no time may the
maximum number of hooks on gear set or retrieved in the course of
fishing exceed 60 hooks per vessel in Chiniak Bay, except that under a
Ceremonial, Educational, or Community Harvest Permit the limit would be
90 hooks per vessel.
Under this action, NMFS would define Chiniak Bay based on the State
of Alaska's definition of the Kodiak Road Zone found at 05 AAC 64.005.
NMFS would define Chiniak Bay as all waters bounded by the shoreline
and straight lines extending from Cape Chiniak (57[deg]37.22' N. lat.,
152[deg]9.36' W. long.), to Buoy 1 at Williams Reef
(57[deg]50.36' N. lat., 152[deg]8.82' W. long.), to East Cape on Spruce
Island (57[deg]54.89' N. lat., 152[deg]19.45' W. long.), to Termination
Point on Kodiak Island (57[deg]51.31' N. lat., 152[deg]24.01' W.
long.), and connecting to a line running counterclockwise along the
shoreline of Kodiak Island to Cape Chiniak (57[deg]37.22' N. lat.,
152[deg]9.36' W. long.). NMFS proposes this definition because latitude
and longitude reference points do not vary and can be easily drawn on
paper and electronic charting systems. The proposed area also includes
the vast majority of local small-vessel sport and subsistence grounds
historically fished for halibut, while maintaining consistency with the
area targeted by the Council's proposed Kodiak Road Zone
recommendation.
Consistent with previous applications of the Community Harvest
Permit (CHP) Program, the Council recommended allowing the use of a CHP
in Area 3A, including Chiniak Bay, to mitigate the proposed increased
restrictions. The CHP Program allows a community or Alaska Native tribe
to select individual harvesters who may possess particular expertise in
halibut fishing to harvest halibut on behalf of the community or Alaska
Native tribe. Possession of a CHP in Area 3A would allow an eligible
tribe or community to use 30 hooks per person up to a maximum of 90
hooks per vessel.
The Council also recommended additional gear restrictions and
seasonal periods for gear restrictions in Sitka Sound to further
address localized depletion concerns. This proposed action would reduce
the allowable gear from 30 hooks to 15 hooks per vessel and prohibit
power hauling during the summer months from June 1 through August 31.
From September 1 through May 31 gear restrictions would remain at 30
hooks per vessel and power hauling would be allowed.
The gear restrictions in this proposed rule would apply only to
gear in use by eligible subsistence fishermen. By applying the gear
restrictions to gear ``set or retrieved'' from a vessel, the gear
restrictions apply only to gear actively engaged in subsistence fishing
for halibut. A subsistence fisherman may possess any amount of gear
onboard the vessel as long as that amount of gear actively being used
does not exceed the prescribed limits. For instance, a box of extra
hooks stored onboard a vessel or a fully rigged set of spare gear in a
vessel would not count toward the subsistence gear restriction because
the gear is not in use. This proposed rule also intends to further
clarify any ambiguity in the gear restrictions by converting the
original text of the gear restrictions to a table format. Because of
this conversion to a table format, information in the regulatory text
at Sec. 300.65(h)(1)(i)(D) concerning the use of setline gear in Sitka
Sound would be moved to Sec. 300.65(e)(5).
Eligible Subsistence Halibut Communities
Persons eligible to conduct subsistence halibut fishing include (1)
residents of rural places with customary and traditional uses of
halibut and (2) all identified members of federally recognized Alaska
Native tribes with a finding of customary and traditional uses of
halibut. A list of rural communities and Alaska Native tribes eligible
to fish for subsistence halibut may be found at Sec. 300.65(g).
The list of rural places recommended by the Council and approved by
the Secretary was derived from customary and traditional findings for
halibut and bottomfish made by the Alaska State Board of Fisheries
(Board) prior to the Alaska Supreme Court decision, McDowell v. State,
785 P.2d 1 (Alaska 1989). Following McDowell, State regulations
directed the Board to determine whether each fish stock in subsistence
use areas of the State is subject to customary and traditional uses.
Therefore, the customary and traditional use determination process does
not focus on communities or areas that conduct the use, but on the
pattern of use of a fish stock. Although the Council engages in a
community-based approach, nothing prevents the Board from nominating
areas, such as remote homesteads, for eligibility for subsistence
halibut.
The Council and Secretary retain exclusive authority to recommend
changes to the list of rural places in Sec. 300.65(g)(1). The Council
initially recognized that some rural communities not explicitly named
in the list may seek a finding of customary and traditional use of
halibut, and established a policy to include those communities if
customary and traditional findings were made. Residents who believed
that their rural place was incorrectly omitted from the eligibility
listing for rural places, or who were seeking eligibility for the first
time, were encouraged to seek a customary and traditional finding from
the Board before petitioning the Council.
In October 2003, the Board received seven appeals from communities
and
[[Page 20010]]
individuals requesting positive customary and traditional use findings
for halibut. The Board forwarded only two proposals to the Council:
Port Tongass Village and Naukati. The remaining petitions failed
because the petitioners were located within non-subsistence use areas
and did not fit the stated criteria.
In December 2004, the Council recommended a provision to include
Naukati as an eligible rural community for subsistence halibut purposes
based on the Board's recommendation. The Council declined including
Port Tongass Village following testimony and evidence that indicated
the proposed rural community consists of only one individual. The
Council determined that this was an insufficient number of residents to
qualify as a community. However, the Council affirmed the Board's
determination that Naukati is a rural community with customary and
traditional use of halibut and recommended adding Naukati as a rural
community for subsistence halibut purposes consistent with the
Council's policy to include communities for which customary and
traditional findings are made by the Board. Therefore, under this
proposed rule, NMFS would add only Naukati to the list of eligible
communities found at Sec. 300.65(g)(1).
Subsistence Halibut Harvest Restrictions
In general, eligible subsistence fishermen may retain up to 20
halibut per day as a daily bag limit, except in Area 2C where only 20
halibut per vessel per day may be retained, and Areas 4C, 4D, and 4E
where no limits on retention apply. In October 2003, the IPHC staff
suggested that subsistence regulations allowed a substantial increase
in harvest that necessitated more effective monitoring. The IPHC
specifically expressed concern with overall enforcement of the
subsistence program and the allowable possession of halibut. The IPHC
identified that enforcement officers currently possess no means to
verify time on the water for subsistence halibut fishermen who possess
more than one daily bag limit, thereby hampering accurate accounting of
halibut removals. The Council subsequently recommended implementing a
possession limit to restrict potential abuses of the daily bag limit
and enhance enforcement of daily harvest limits.
Based on the recommendation of the IPHC, the Council recommended
that the proposed possession limit apply to Areas 2C, 3A, and 3B, which
have experienced increased fishing effort due to higher population
density. The Council determined that no possession limit was necessary
for Areas 4A and 4B because those areas were not experiencing
corresponding increases in fishing effort and population density.
This proposed action would implement a possession limit of one
daily bag limit for Areas 2C, 3A, and 3B. For instance, current
regulations restrict a fisherman in Area 2C to 20 halibut per vessel
per day, thus that fisherman's possession limit would be equal to his
or her daily bag limit. Likewise, current regulations restrict a
fisherman in Areas 3A and 3B to 20 halibut per person per day, so that
fisherman's possession limit would be equal to his or her daily bag
limit. Bag limits within Sitka Sound in Area 2C also would be subject
to this action. Therefore, the possession limit within Sitka Sound
would be 10 halibut per vessel from September 1 to May 31 and 5 halibut
per vessel from June 1 through August 31. This proposed action would
not apply in Areas 4A and 4B. This proposed action would have no effect
in Areas 4C, 4D, or 4E because no daily bag limit exists in those
areas. This proposed action also would have no effect on the retention
limits allowed for CHPs, Ceremonial Permits, or Educational Permits.
Charter Vessel Prohibition
Current regulations prohibit the retention of subsistence halibut
harvested using a charter vessel, which is defined at Sec. 300.61 as
``a vessel used for hire in sport fishing for halibut, but not
including a vessel without a hired operator.'' NOAA Enforcement
expressed difficulty enforcing the prohibition under the current
definition because of problems associated with determining whether a
vessel operator is ``for hire.'' The Council subsequently clarified
that the prohibition was meant only to prohibit subsistence fishers
from hiring someone to take them subsistence fishing, but not to
prohibit the use of vessels registered as charter vessels from being
used for subsistence fishing. NOAA Enforcement recommended revising the
definition of charter vessel to improve enforcement of the prohibition
consistent with the Council's intent.
The Council adopted NOAA Enforcement's recommendation and provided
additional guidance to ensure the prohibition continued to restrict
subsistence fishing on charter vessels. In December 2004, the Council
recommended revising the definition of charter vessel to ``a vessel
registered as such with the Alaska Department of Fish and Game.'' NOAA
Enforcement believed this definition would improve the identification
of vessels used illegally as charter vessels for subsistence halibut
and the enforcement of other charter vessel restrictions. NOAA
Enforcement has since recommended using the term ``sport fishing guide
vessel'' in the regulatory definition for a charter vessel because this
is the term used in State of Alaska regulations at 05 AAC 75.077.
The Council further recommended, and NMFS proposes, a provision
that would allow a charter vessel to be used for subsistence halibut
fishing, but use for that purpose must be restricted to the owner of
record as indicated on the State of Alaska vessel registration,
provided the owner is eligible to fish for subsistence halibut, and the
owner's immediate family. This provision would allow qualified
subsistence halibut fishers who also engage in charter fishing to use
their vessels to conduct subsistence fishing, but limit such fishing to
the vessel owner and his or her immediate family. The Council
recommended not defining ``immediate family'' in regulation.
The Council recommended, and NMFS proposes, the prohibition of the
use of a charter vessel for subsistence halibut fishing while charter
clients are onboard the vessel and prohibiting the transfer of
subsistence halibut to charter clients to prevent abuses of the
proposed charter vessel allowance. The prohibition against subsistence
fishing while charter clients are onboard would prevent the vessel
owner or any other person onboard the vessel from engaging in
subsistence fishing at any time while a charter client is onboard the
vessel. This would preclude the use of any gear not classified as sport
fishing gear or retaining any halibut in excess of the sport limits
while charter clients are onboard any vessel. Additionally, a
prohibition of the transfer of subsistence halibut to charter clients
would apply at all times, meaning that at no time may subsistence
halibut be provided by a charter operator to any person who has
chartered a sportfishing trip with that charter operator.
Customary and Traditional Trade Restrictions
Current regulations at Sec. 300.66(j) specify that it is unlawful
for any person to retain or possess subsistence halibut for commercial
purposes; cause subsistence halibut to be sold, bartered, or otherwise
entered into commerce; or solicit exchange of subsistence halibut for
commercial purposes, except that a qualified subsistence fisherman may
engage in the customary trade of subsistence halibut through monetary
exchange of no more than $400 per year.
[[Page 20011]]
The Council originally intended that the $400 annual limit would allow
a person who receives subsistence halibut from an eligible subsistence
halibut fisherman, to help defer the donating fisherman's costs of
harvesting subsistence halibut.
The Council was concerned that continuing the $400 customary trade
limit would confound Council intent by allowing de facto ``sale'' of
subsistence halibut outside customary and traditional trade. In June
2003, the Council's Enforcement Committee reviewed issues related to
customary trade and determined that (1) despite the Council's intent to
not create a new commercial fishery, current regulations essentially
allow the sale of subsistence halibut up to the $400 annual limit; (2)
the $400 annual limit lacks enforceability because enforcement officers
cannot easily distinguish between sale and customary and traditional
exchange for cash; and (3) current regulations do not clearly prohibit
advertising and solicitation for commercial sale. The Enforcement
Committee recommended the Council revise the customary trade
restrictions to meet the original intent of allowing customary and
traditional trade.
On the suggestion of the Enforcement Committee, the Council
recommended revising the regulations to eliminate customary trade for
cash. The Council additionally determined that the identification of a
dollar amount for the allowance of customary trade in the regulations
resulted in some subsistence users ``selling'' halibut to other
subsistence users outside of customary and traditional practices, and
that the dollar amount effectively served as a target rather than a
limit. NOAA Enforcement also reported subsistence halibut illegally
entering the commercial market, due in part to the difficulty of
enforcing the $400 annual limit.
This proposed action would eliminate the $400 customary trade limit
and restrict any monetary exchange for subsistence halibut specifically
to reimbursement of actual trip expenses directly related to the
harvest of subsistence halibut. Actual trip expenses would be limited
to ice, bait, food, or fuel only. Additional restrictions would be
applied separately to rural community residents and Alaska Native
tribal members.
Under this proposed action, persons who qualify as rural residents
under Sec. 300.65(g)(1) and hold a subsistence halibut registration
certificate (SHARC) in their name under Sec. 300.65(i) may be
reimbursed only by residents of the same rural community listed on his
or her subsistence halibut registration certificate. For example, a
rural community resident in Hoonah may be reimbursed for actual trip
expenses directly related to subsistence halibut fishing by another
resident of Hoonah but may not be reimbursed by a resident of Sitka.
The Council proposed this restriction as an additional measure to
discourage the entry of subsistence halibut into commerce.
Additionally, under this proposed action, persons who qualify as
Alaska Native tribal members under Sec. 300.65(g)(2) and hold a SHARC
in their name under Sec. 300.65(i) would be eligible for reimbursement
only from an Alaska Native tribe or its members. For example, a tribal
SHARC holder from the Kenaitze Indian Tribe may be reimbursed by a
member of the Gwichin Athabascan Indian Tribe. However, persons
possessing a SHARC designated as tribal would be ineligible to receive
reimbursement from anyone other than another Alaska Native tribe or its
members.
Special Permits in Non-subsistence Areas
Generally, eligible persons may harvest subsistence halibut in all
Convention waters in and off Alaska except for the four designated non-
subsistence marine areas: the Ketchikan non-subsistence marine waters
area, the Juneau non-subsistence marine waters area, the Anchorage-
Matsu-Kenai non-subsistence marine waters area, and the Valdez non-
subsistence marine waters area (Sec. 300.65(h)(3) and Figures 2-5 to
subpart E).
In December 2004, the Council recommended allowing the use of
Ceremonial Permits and Educational Permits in non-subsistence marine
areas by tribes whose traditional fishing grounds are located within
Areas 2C and 3A. This proposed action would allow twelve Alaska Native
tribes whose traditional fishing grounds fall within Areas 2C and 3A to
conduct subsistence halibut fishing in areas currently designated as
non-subsistence marine areas. Therefore, if persons on a vessel possess
a Ceremonial Permit or an Educational Permit, they would be allowed to
conduct subsistence fishing in the non-subsistence marine areas subject
to other existing regulations.
Use of Ceremonial Permits and Educational Permits within non-
subsistence marine areas would remain subject to gear and harvest
restrictions for those permits consistent with the IPHC regulatory area
in which they are used. Ceremonial Permits and Educational Permits
allow Alaska Native tribes in Areas 2C and 3A as listed in Sec.
300.65(g)(2) to harvest up to 25 halibut per permit. Ceremonial Permits
and Educational Permits in non-subsistence marine areas maintain the
same gear limitations as those required when fishing under a SHARC in
Areas 2C and 3A (i.e., 30 hooks per vessel in Area 2C and 30 hooks per
person or up to 90 hooks per vessel in Area 3A). Ceremonial Permits and
Educational Permits also have unique application and reporting
requirements (Sec. 300.65(j) and (k)).
Classification
The NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed
rule is necessary for the conservation and management of the halibut
fishery and that it is consistent with the Halibut Act and other
applicable law, subject to further consideration after public comment.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866. This proposed rule also complies
with the Secretary's authority under the Halibut Act to implement
management measures for the halibut fishery.
An initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) was prepared, as
required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The
IRFA describes the economic impact this proposed rule, if adopted,
would have on small entities. A description of the action, why it is
being considered, and the legal basis for this action are contained at
the beginning of this section in the preamble and in the SUMMARY
section of the preamble. A summary of the analysis follows. Copies of
this analysis are available from the Council or NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
This proposed rule would implement six actions to amend the
subsistence halibut regulations: (1) revise the subsistence gear
restrictions in Kodiak and add seasonal gear and vessel limits in the
Sitka Sound area; (2) add the village of Naukati to the list of
eligible subsistence halibut communities; (3) implement a possession
limit equal to one daily bag limit to enhance enforcement; (4) revise
the definition of charter vessel; (5) revise regulations regarding
customary trade; and (6) allow the use of special permits within non-
subsistence use areas by tribes eligible for the permits. Only actions
1 and 6 would directly regulate ``small entities,'' as defined by the
RFA. The remaining four actions are not addressed because they affect
individuals, rather than ``entities,'' as defined by RFA. All
attributable impacts on directly regulated small entities, accruing
from either action, appear to be beneficial.
[[Page 20012]]
Action 1 would directly regulate Alaska Native tribes, or
governmental entities in the absence of a tribe, that are eligible to
participate in the subsistence halibut program off Kodiak and Chiniak
Bay. Action 1 would govern nine Alaska Native tribes. Action 6 would
affect thirteen Alaska Native tribes, but no governmental entities.
It is NMFS policy to consider only adverse impacts when preparing
an IRFA, consistent with the intent of Congress to minimize effects on
small entities. No such adverse impacts appear to be associated with
Actions 1 and 6. However, detailed information and empirical data about
the operational structures, strategies, and fiscal conditions of the
various Alaska Native tribes, which are likely to be directly regulated
by the proposed actions, are not presently available to the analysts to
support preparation of a factual basis upon which to certify, under RFA
provisions. Therefore, the Council prepared an IRFA to fulfill the
requirements of the RFA, despite the high probability that the actions
will not have a substantial adverse effect on a substantial number of
small entities, as these terms are defined under the RFA.
Proposed actions 1 and 6 aim to enhance management of the
subsistence halibut fishery as it pertains to use by Alaska Native
tribes for the purpose of recognizing and appropriately accommodating
subsistence practices. These actions are taken under the authority of
the Northern Pacific Halibut Act of 1982.
The principal decisions in the preferred alternatives for actions 1
and 6 address changes to (1) gear limits and the use of Community
Harvest Permits (CHPs) by Alaska Native tribes in Kodiak and Chiniak
Bay, and seasonal gear and vessel limits in Sitka Sound; and (2)
fishing in non-subsistence use areas. The preferred alternatives to
implement CHPs for Alaska Native tribes in Kodiak and Chiniak Bay (CHPs
are not allowed in Sitka Sound) under action 1, and to allow ceremonial
and educational permits to be used by Alaska Native tribes in non-
subsistence use areas under action 6, directly regulate small entities.
The Council addressed multiple alternatives for each action under
the RFA. Under action 1, the Council analyzed three alternatives: (1)
no action; (2) change gear restrictions and annual limits in Kodiak,
Prince William Sound, Cook Inlet, and the Sitka LAMP; and (3) change
gear restrictions and annual limits only in Kodiak and the Sitka LAMP.
The Council selected alternative 3 as the preferred alternative for
action 1. For action 6, the Council analyzed three alternatives: (1) no
action; (2) allow the use of CHPs, educational permits, and ceremonial
permits in non-subsistence use areas by tribes whose traditional
fishing grounds are located within IPHC Areas 2C and 3A, with the
associated daily bag limit; and (3) allow the use of educational
permits and ceremonial permits, but not CHPs, in non-subsistence use
areas by tribes whose traditional fishing grounds are located within
IPHC Areas 2C and 3A, with the associated daily bag limit. The Council
selected alternative 3 as the preferred alternative for action 6.
Based on the best available scientific data and information, the
IRFA (including the RIR) reveals that none of the significant
alternatives to the proposed action, other than the preferred
alternatives, have the potential to accomplish the objectives of the
Council consistent with the Halibut Act, the RFA, and other applicable
statutes, and minimize the adverse economic impacts of the proposed
rule on directly regulated small entities.
This proposed rule contains collection-of-information requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) and which have been
approved by OMB. These collections are listed by control number.
OMB Control Number 0648-0460
Public reporting burden is estimated to average ten minutes for
Subsistence halibut registration certificate (SHARC) for rural or
individual use and ten minutes for SHARC for tribal use.
OMB Control Number 0648-0512
Public reporting burden for a Subsistence Halibut Special Permit
Application for ceremonial harvest, education harvest, or community
harvest is estimated to average ten minutes per response.
These estimates include the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.
Send comments regarding this burden estimate, or any other aspect of
this data collection, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to
NMFS (see ADDRESSES) and by e-mail to David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov, or
fax to 202-395-7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, and no person shall be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB Control Number.
NMFS is not aware of any other Federal rules that would duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with these actions.
Executive Order 13175 of November 6, 2000 (25 U.S.C. 450 note), the
Executive Memorandum of April 29, 1994 (25 U.S.C. 450 note), and the
American Indian and Alaska Native Policy of the U.S. Department of
Commerce (March 30, 1995) outline the responsibilities of the National
Marine Fisheries Service in matters affecting tribal interests. Section
161 of Public Law 108-199 (188 Stat 452), as amended by section 518 of
Public Law 108-447 (118 Stat 3267), extends the consultation
requirements of Executive Order 13175 to Alaska Native corporations.
Consultations with the Alaska Native Subsistence Halibut Working
Group, under Executive Order 13175, resulted in recommendations to
allow the use of special permits in non-subsistence use areas. NMFS
will contact tribal governments and Alaska Native corporations which
may be affected by the proposed action, provide them with a copy of
this proposed rule, and offer them an opportunity to consult.
List of Subjects for 50 CFR Part 300
Pacific halibut fisheries, Alaska, Alaska Natives, Fisheries,
Recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
Dated: April 8 2008.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Operations, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR part 300, subpart E as follows:
PART 300--INTERNATIONAL FISHERIES REGULATIONS
Subpart E--Pacific Halibut Fisheries
1. The authority citation for part 300, subpart E continues to read
as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773-773k.
2. In Sec. 300.61 add definitions of ``Chiniak Bay'' and ``Power
hauling'' in alphabetical order and revise the definition of ``Charter
vessel'' to read as follows:
Sec. 300.61 Definitions.
* * * * *
Charter vessel means a vessel registered as a sport fishing guide
vessel with the Alaska Department of Fish and Game.
Chiniak Bay means all waters bounded by the shoreline and straight
lines connecting the coordinates in the order listed:
[[Page 20013]]
north from Cape Chiniak (57[deg]37.22' N. lat., 152[deg]9.36' W.
long.);
to Buoy 1 at Williams Reef (57[deg]50.36' N. lat.,
152[deg]8.82' W. long.);
to East Cape on Spruce Island (57[deg]54.89' N. lat.,
152[deg]19.45' W. long.);
to Termination Point on Kodiak Island (57[deg]51.31' N. lat.,
152[deg]24.01' W. long.); and connecting to a line running
counterclockwise along the shoreline of Kodiak Island to Cape Chiniak
(57[deg]37.22' N. lat., 152[deg]9.36' W. long.).
* * * * *
Power hauling means using electrically, hydraulically, or
mechanically powered devices or attachments or other assisting devises
or attachments to deploy and retrieve fishing gear. Power hauling does
not include the use of hand power, a hand powered crank, a fishing rod,
a downrigger, or a hand troll gurdy.
* * * * *
3. In Sec. 300.65:
A. Revise paragraphs (e)(1)(ii) introductory text, (h)(1)(i),
(h)(2), (j) introductory text, (j)(1)(ii), (j)(1)(iii), (j)(3)(i)
introductory text, (j)(3)(i)(A), (k)(3)(i), and (k)(3)(ii).
B. Add paragraph (e)(5).
C. In paragraph (g)(1) in the table entitled ``Halibut Regulatory
Area 2C'' an entry for ``Naukati'' is added in alphabetical order.
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 300.65 Catch sharing plan and domestic management measures in
waters in and off Alaska.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) With respect to paragraphs (e)(3), (e)(4), and (e)(5) of this
section, that part of the Commission regulatory area 2C that is
enclosed on the north and east:
* * * * *
(5) Setline gear may not be used in a 4 nm radius extending south
from Low Island at 57[deg]00.70' N. lat., 135[deg]36.57' W. long.
within Sitka Sound, as defined in paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section,
from June 1 through August 31.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(1) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Halibut Regulatory Area 2C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rural Community Organized Entity
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * * .............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Naukati Municipality
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * * .............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Subsistence fishing gear set or retrieved from a vessel while
engaged in subsistence fishing for halibut must not have more than the
allowable hooks per vessel, or per personregistered in accordance with
paragraph (i) of this section and aboard the vessel, whichever is less,
according to the regulatory area and permit type indicated in the
following table:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Area Permit Type Gear Restrictions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2C (Except Sitka Sound) SHARC 30 hooks per vessel
-------------------------------------------
Ceremonial Permit 30 hooks per vessel
-------------------------------------------
Educational Permit 30 hooks per vessel
-------------------------------------------
Community Harvest 30 hooks per person
Permit onboard up to 90
hooks
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sitka Sound SHARC September 1 through
May 31: 30 hooks per
vessel
-----------------------
.................. June 1 through August
31: 15 hooks per
vessel; no power
hauling
-------------------------------------------
Ceremonial Permit September 1 through
May 31: 30 hooks per
vessel
-----------------------
.................. June 1 through August
31: fishing under
Ceremonial Permit not
allowed
-------------------------------------------
Educational Permit 30 hooks per vessel
-------------------------------------------
Community Harvest fishing under
Permit Community Harvest
Permit not allowed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3A (Except Chiniak Bay) SHARC 30 hooks per person
onboard up to 90
hooks per vessel
-------------------------------------------
Ceremonial Permit 30 hooks per person
onboard
-------------------------------------------
Educational Permit 30 hooks per person
onboard up to 90
hooks per vessel
-------------------------------------------
Community Harvest 30 hooks per person
Permit onboard up to 90
hooks per vessel
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chiniak Bay SHARC 30 hooks per person
onboard up to 90
hooks per vessel
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ceremonial Permit 30 hooks per person
onboard up to 90
hooks per vessel
-------------------------------------------
Educational Permit 30 hooks per person
onboard up to 90
hooks per vessel
-------------------------------------------
Community Harvest 30 hooks per person
Permit onboard up to 90
hooks per vessel
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3B SHARC 30 hooks per person
onboard up to 90
hooks per vessel
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4A and 4B SHARC 30 hooks per person
onboard up to 90
hooks per vessel
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4C, 4D, and 4E SHARC no hook limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 20014]]
* * * * *
(2) The retention of subsistence halibut is limited per person
eligible to conduct subsistence fishing for halibut and onboard the
vessel according to the following table:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Area Permit Type Retention Limits
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2C (Except Sitka Sound) SHARC 20 halibut per day per
vessel and in
possession
-------------------------------------------
Ceremonial Permit 25 halibut per permit
-------------------------------------------
Educational Permit 25 halibut per permit
-------------------------------------------
Community Harvest no daily or possession
Permit limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sitka Sound SHARC September 1 through
May 31: 10 halibut
per day per vessel
and in possession
-----------------------
.................. June 1 through August
31: 5 halibut per day
per vessel and in
possession
-------------------------------------------
Ceremonial Permit September 1 through
May 31: 25 halibut
per permit
-----------------------
.................. June 1 through August
31: fishing under
Ceremonial Permit not
allowed
-------------------------------------------
Educational Permit 25 halibut per permit
-------------------------------------------
Community Harvest fishing under
Permit Community Harvest
Permit not allowed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3A, including Chiniak Bay SHARC 20 halibut per person
per day and in
possession
-------------------------------------------
Ceremonial Permit 25 halibut per permit
-------------------------------------------
Educational Permit 25 halibut per permit
-------------------------------------------
Community Harvest no daily or possession
Permit limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3B SHARC 20 halibut per person
per day and in
possession
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4A and 4B SHARC 20 halibut per person
per day; no
possession limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4C, 4D, and 4E SHARC no daily or possession
limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(j) Community Harvest Permit (CHP). An Area 2C or Area 3A community
or Alaska Native tribe listed in paragraphs (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this
section may apply for a CHP, which allows a community or Alaska Native
tribe to appoint one or more individuals from its respective community
or Alaska Native tribe to harvest subsistence halibut from a single
vessel under reduced gear and harvest restrictions. The CHP consists of
a harvest log and up to five laminated permit cards. A CHP is a permit
subject to regulation under Sec. 679.4(a) of this title.
(1) * * *
(ii) NMFS will issue a CHP to a community in Area 2C or Area 3A
only if:
(A) The applying community is listed as eligible in Area 2C or Area
3A according to paragraph (g)(1) of this section; and
(B) No Alaska Native tribe listed in paragraph (g)(2) of this
section exists in that community.
(iii) NMFS will issue a CHP to an Alaska Native tribe in Area 2C or
Area 3A only if the applying tribe is listed as eligible in Area 2C or
Area 3A according to paragraph (g)(2) of this section.
* * * * *
(3) * * *
(i) In Area 2C or Area 3A, except that a CHP may not be used:
(A) Within Sitka Sound as defined in paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this
section (see Figure 1 to this subpart E); or
* * * * *
(k) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) In Area 3A;
(ii) In Area 2C, except a Ceremonial Permit may not be used within
Sitka Sound from June 1 through August 31;
* * * * *
4. In Sec. 300.66:
A. Redesignate paragraphs (j) through (m) as paragraphs (k) through
(n), respectively.
B. Revise paragraph (i) and newly redesignated paragraph (k).
C. Add new paragraph (j).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 300.66 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(i) Fish for subsistence halibut from a charter vessel or retain
subsistence halibut onboard a charter vessel if anyone other than the
owner of record, as indicated on the State of Alaska vessel
registration, or the owner's immediate family is aboard the charter
vessel and unless each person engaging in subsistence fishing onboard
the charter vessel holds a subsistence halibut registration certificate
in the person's name pursuant to Sec. 300.65(i) and abides by the gear
and harvest restrictions found at Sec. 300.65(h).
(j) Transfer subsistence halibut to charter vessel anglers.
(k) Retain or possess subsistence halibut for commercial purposes;
cause subsistence halibut to be sold, bartered, or otherwise entered
into commerce; or solicit exchange of subsistence halibut for
commercial purposes, except that a person who qualified to conduct
subsistence fishing for halibut under Sec. 300.65(g), and who holds a
subsistence halibut registration certificate in the person's name under
Sec. 300.65(i), may be
[[Page 20015]]
reimbursed for the expense of fishing for subsistence halibut under the
following conditions:
(1) Persons who qualify as rural residents under Sec. 300.65(g)(1)
and hold a subsistence halibut registration certificate in the
persons's name under Sec. 300.65(i) may be reimbursed for actual
expenses directly related to subsistence fishing for halibut, including
only ice, bait, food, or fuel, by residents of the same rural community
listed on the person's subsistence halibut registration certificate; or
(2) Persons who qualify as Alaska Native tribal members under Sec.
300.65(g)(2) and hold a subsistence halibut registration certificate in
the person's name under Sec. 300.65(i) may be reimbursed for actual
expenses directly related to subsistence fishing for halibut, including
only ice, bait, food, or fuel, by any Alaska Native tribe or its
members.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-7902 Filed 4-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S