Notice of Availability of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Habitat Conservation Plan, 19822-19824 [E8-7821]
Download as PDF
19822
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 71 / Friday, April 11, 2008 / Notices
17, 2008 (73 FR 14222), listed the
application deadline as April 16, 2008.
The correct application deadline is 5
p.m. EST, April 18, 2008.
Intergovernmental Review
Applications under this program are
not subject to Executive Order 12372,
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Limitation of Liability
In no event will NOAA or the
Department of Commerce be responsible
for proposal preparation costs if these
programs fail to receive funding or are
cancelled because of other agency
priorities. Publication of this
announcement does not oblige NOAA to
award any specific project or to obligate
any available funds.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
NOAA must analyze the potential
environmental impacts, as required by
the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), for applicant projects or
proposals which are seeking NOAA
Federal funding opportunities. Detailed
information on NOAA compliance with
NEPA can be found at the following
NOAA NEPA Web site: https://
www.nepa.noaa.gov/, including our
NOAA Administrative Order 216–6 for
NEPA, https://www.nepa.noaa.gov/
NAO216_6_TOC.pdf, and the Council
on Environmental Quality
implementation regulations, https://
ceq.eh.doe.gov/nepa/regs/ceq/
toc_ceq.htm. Consequently, as part of an
applicant’s package, and under their
description of their program activities,
applicants are required to provide
detailed information on the activities to
be conducted, locations, sites, species
and habitat to be affected, possible
construction activities, and any
environmental concerns that may exist
(e.g., the use and disposal of hazardous
or toxic chemicals, introduction of nonindigenous species, impacts to
endangered and threatened species,
aquaculture projects, and impacts to
coral reef systems). In addition to
providing specific information that will
serve as the basis for any required
impact analyses, applicants may also be
requested to assist NOAA in drafting of
an environmental assessment, if NOAA
determines an assessment is required.
Applicants will also be required to
cooperate with NOAA in identifying
feasible measures to reduce or avoid any
identified adverse environmental
impacts of their proposal. The failure to
do so shall be grounds for not selecting
an application. In some cases if
additional information is required after
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:21 Apr 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
an application is selected, funds can be
withheld by the Grants Officer under a
special award condition requiring the
recipient to submit additional
environmental compliance information
sufficient to enable NOAA to make an
assessment on any impacts that a project
may have on the environment.
flexibility analysis has not been
prepared.
Department of Commerce Pre-Award
Notification
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains collection-ofinformation requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). The
use of Standard Forms 424, 424A, 424B,
and SF–LLL and CD–346 has been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the respective
control numbers 0348–0043, 0348–0044,
0348–0040, 0348–0046, and 0605–0001.
Notwithstanding any other provision of
law, no person is required to, nor shall
a person be subject to a penalty for
failure to comply with, a collection of
information subject to the requirements
of the PRA unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
OMB control number.
Executive Order 12866
This notice has been determined to be
not significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
It has been determined that this notice
does not contain policies with
Federalism implications as that term is
defined in Executive Order 13132.
Administrative Procedure Act/
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Prior notice and an opportunity for
public comment are not required by the
Administrative Procedure Act or any
other law for rules concerning public
property, loans, grants, benefits, and
contracts (5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2)). Because
notice and opportunity for comment are
not required pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 or
any other law, the analytical
requirements for the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) are
inapplicable. Therefore, a regulatory
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 3510–12–P
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XH15
The Department of Commerce PreAward Notification Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements
contained in the Federal Register notice
of February 11, 2008 (73 FR 7696), are
applicable to this solicitation.
PO 00000
Helen Hurcombe,
Director, Acquisition and Grants Office.
[FR Doc. E8–7708 Filed 4–10–08; 8:45 am]
Notice of Availability of a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement and
Habitat Conservation Plan
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce
ACTION: Notice; availability of
documents for public comment and
public hearings.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
availability of the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (DEIS) and draft
habitat conservation plan (HCP) for
public review and comment. The City of
Portland (City) has submitted an
application to the National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) for an
incidental take permit under section 10
of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of
1973 as amended. The HCP also serves
as the basis of an application to NMFS
that they take steps under the ESA to
limit the application of the prohibition
against take of listed salmon and
steelhead so that it does not apply to the
continued operation and maintenance of
the Bull Run water supply system.
DATES: Written comments on the draft
HCP, Implementation Agreement and
DEIS will be accepted for a period of 60
days, ending at 5 p.m. Pacific Time on
May 27, 2008. Written comments may
be sent by mail, facsimile, or e-mail to
the addresses listed below.
ADDRESSES: Please address written
comments to Nancy Munn, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1201 NE
Lloyd Blvd, Suite 1100, Portland,
Oregon 97232, facsimile (503) 231–
6893. Please send e-mail comments to:
BullRunHCP.nwr@noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information, or to receive the
documents on CD ROM, please contact
Nancy Munn, Project Manager, National
Marine Fisheries Service, (503) 231–
6269.
The
documents being made available
include: (1) the proposed habitat
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 71 / Friday, April 11, 2008 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
conservation plan; (2) the proposed
Implementing Agreement; and (3) the
draft environmental impact statement
(DEIS). This notice is provided pursuant
to the ESA and the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, as amended. The NMFS is
furnishing this notice to allow other
agencies and the public an opportunity
to review and comment on these
documents. All comments received will
become part of the public record for this
action. Hard bound copies of the
conservation plan, Implementation
Agreement, and DEIS are available for
viewing, or partial or complete
duplication, at all Oregon State libraries
and the main Multnomah County
Library in Portland, Oregon.
Background
Section 9 of the ESA and Federal
regulations prohibit the unauthorized
‘‘taking’’ of a species listed as
endangered or threatened. The term take
is defined under the ESA to mean
harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot,
wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or
to attempt to engage in any such
conduct. Harm is defined to include
significant habitat modification or
degradation where it actually kills or
injures wildlife by significantly
impairing essential behavioral patterns,
including breeding, feeding, and
sheltering (50 CFR 17.3, 50 CFR
222.102). NMFS further defines harm to
include significant habitat modification
or degradation where it actually kills or
injures fish or wildlife by significantly
impairing essential behavioral patterns,
including breeding, feeding, spawning,
migrating, rearing, and sheltering (64 FR
60727). The NMFS may issue incidental
take permits, under section 10(a)(1)(B)
of the ESA, to take listed species
incidental to, and not the purpose of,
otherwise lawful activities. NMFS
regulations governing permits for
federally endangered and threatened
species are promulgated under 50 CFR
222.307. NMFS also may issue a rule
under section 4(d) of the ESA, providing
for the conservation of threatened
species while authorizing incidental
take under certain conditions. The Bull
Run watershed has been used by the
City for water supply since 1895. The
City’s water system provides water to
residents and businesses within the City
as well as to a number of surrounding
communities. As a result of the listing
of several salmon and steelhead species
in Oregon State in the mid to late 1990s,
the City was concerned about
compliance with the ESA and other
Federal regulations, and water supply
reliability and affordability. The
presence and operation of the water
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:21 Apr 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
system infrastructure creates impacts on
habitat for several species of listed fish
because of changes in river flow, river
temperature, and aquatic and riparian
habitat. The City’s conservation plan
includes 49 habitat conservation
measures to protect and improve water
quality and habitat for aquatic species
within the boundaries of the Sandy
River Basin.
The City has applied to: (1) obtain an
incidental take permit, pursuant to
section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA for
endangered, threatened and covered
species; and, (2) request from the NMFS
a limitation on the application of the
prohibition against take, pursuant to
section 4(d) of the ESA for identified
threatened species only, for activities
associated with the continued operation
and maintenance of the Bull Run water
supply system. The activities associated
with the continued operation and
maintenance of the Bull Run water
supply system are described in the draft
HCP and Implementing Agreement and
serve as documentation that the
conservation plan meets the
requirements of section 4(d) as well as
section 10. Each of these activities is
represented as an alternative in the
DEIS. Activities proposed for coverage
under the incidental take permits or for
a limitation on the application of the
prohibition against take include the
following: (1) operation, maintenance,
and repair of the water system; (2)
implementation of habitat conservation,
research, and monitoring measures; and
(3) incidental land management
activities. The proposed incidental take
permits would authorize the take of the
following federally threatened species
incidental to otherwise lawful activities:
Lower Columbia River chinook salmon
(Oncorhynchus shawytscha), Lower
Columbia River steelhead (O. mykiss),
Lower Columbia River coho salmon (O.
keta), and Columbia River chum salmon
(O. keta).
The draft HCP also includes
conservation measures and effects
analyses for 18 fish and wildlife species
under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service. The species
included are those most likely to be
affected by water system operations
and/or benefited by measures designed
for the anadromous fish.
The proposed duration of the
incidental take permit and conservation
plan would be 50 years, though many
aspects of the plan’s conservation
strategy are intended to benefit aquatic
species and their habitat long into the
future. The NMFS formally initiated an
environmental review of the project
through publication of a Notice of Intent
to prepare an Environmental Impact
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19823
Statement in the Federal Register on
March 27, 2006 (71 FR 15168). That
document also announced a public
scoping period during which interested
parties were invited to provide written
comments expressing their issues or
concerns relating to the proposal and to
attend one of two public scoping
meetings held in Portland, Oregon.
Based on public scoping comments,
NMFS has prepared a DEIS to analyze
the effects of alternatives on the human
environment. Implementation of the
City’s conservation plan, including
issuance of the associated incidental
take permits from NMFS for threatened
species is Alternative 2 in the DEIS.
Three other alternatives are analyzed in
the DEIS including: Alternative 1, no
action, in that the incidental take permit
would not be issued to the City; and
Alternative 3, providing fish passage
facilities at the two dams on the Bull
Run River.
This document is provided pursuant
to the ESA and NEPA regulations.
NMFS will evaluate the application,
associated documents, and comments
submitted thereon to determine whether
the applications meet the requirements
of the ESA and NEPA. The NMFS will
revise the DEIS in a Final
Environmental Impact Statement. The
NMFS’ decisions whether to issue an
incidental take permit or limits on the
application of the prohibition against
take will be made upon completion of
the Endangered Species Act
determinations and Final
Environmental Impact Statement and
associated Record of Decision.
Public Meetings
The NMFS has scheduled two public
meetings to receive comments from the
public concerning the DEIS and draft
HCP. (1) Monday April 28, 2008, 5:30
p.m. to 8:30 p.m., East Portland
Community Center, Multipurpose Room
1, 740 SE 106th Ave, Portland,
Oregon(2) Tuesday, April 29, 2008, 5:30
p.m. to 8:30 p.m., Lovejoy Room,
Portland City Hall, 1221 SW 4th Ave.,
Portland, Oregon.
Special Accommodations
These meetings are physically
accessible to people with disabilities.
Requests for sign language
interpretation or other auxiliary aids
should be directed to Nancy Munn,
(503) 231–6893 at least 5 working days
prior to the meeting date.
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
19824
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 71 / Friday, April 11, 2008 / Notices
Dated: April 7, 2008.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office
of Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8–7821 Filed 4–10–08; 8:45 am]
Background
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[Docket No. 070727423–8495–02]
RIN 0648–XB75
Endangered and Threatened Species;
Notice of Finding on a Petition to List
the Lynn Canal Population of Pacific
Herring as a Threatened or
Endangered Species
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of finding; initiation of
status review.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, NMFS, announce a 12–
month finding on a petition to list Lynn
Canal Pacific Herring (Clupea pallasi) as
a threatened or endangered Species
under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA). After a formal review of the best
available scientific and commercial
information, we find that listing Lynn
Canal Pacific herring as threatened or
endangered under the ESA is not
warranted because this population does
not constitute a species, subspecies, or
distinct population segment (DPS)
under the ESA. However, the Lynn
Canal population is part of a larger DPS
of Pacific herring that may warrant
listing under the ESA, and, therefore,
we initiate a status review to evaluate its
status.
DATES: The finding announced in this
notice is effective immediately.
ADDRESSES: The complete file for this
finding is available for public inspection
by appointment during normal business
hours at the office of NMFS Alaska
Region, Protected Resources Division,
709 West Ninth Street, Room 461,
Juneau, AK 99801. This file includes the
status review report, information
provided by the public, and scientific
and commercial information gathered
for the status review.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Erika Phillips, NMFS Alaska Region,
(907) 586–7312, Kaja Brix, NMFS
Alaska Region, (907) 586–7235 or Marta
Nammack, NMFS Office of Protected
Resources, (301) 713–1401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:21 Apr 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
Section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) (ESA) requires that
when a petition to revise the List of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants is found to present
substantial scientific and commercial
information, we make a finding on
whether the petitioned action is (a) not
warranted, (b) warranted, or (c)
warranted but precluded from
immediate proposal by other pending
proposals of higher priority. This
finding is to be made within 1 year of
the date the petition was received, and
the finding is to be published promptly
in the Federal Register.
On April 2, 2007, we received a
petition to designate the Lynn Canal
stock of Pacific herring (Clupea pallasi)
as a threatened or endangered DPS
under the ESA. The petition was
submitted by the Juneau Group of the
Sierra Club, Juneau, Alaska. The
Petitioner also requested that we
designate critical habitat for Lynn Canal
Pacific herring concurrent with listing
under the ESA.
After reviewing the petition, the
literature cited in the petition, and other
literature and information available in
our files, we found that the petition met
the requirements of the regulations
under 50 CFR 424.14(b)(2) and
determined that the petition presented
substantial information indicating that
the petitioned action may be warranted.
This finding was published on
September 10, 2007 (72 FR 51619). At
that time, we commenced a status
review of Lynn Canal herring and
solicited information pertaining to the
stock structure and status of Pacific
herring in southeast Alaska, including
Lynn Canal.
Status Review
In order to determine whether the
Lynn Canal Pacific herring population
constitutes a species that warrants
protection under the ESA, we convened
a Biological Review Team of Federal
scientists with expertise in Pacific
herring biology, fish genetics and stock
delineations, population ecology of
forage fishes, nearshore marine ecology,
fisheries stock assessment, and herring
population status reviews. This expert
panel reviewed Pacific herring life
history, genetics data, stock structure
research, information on larval
distribution and transport, spawning
distributions, tagging studies,
metapopulation research, and other
published and unpublished literature
and data on herring stocks throughout
the eastern North Pacific.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
For the purposes of the ESA, Congress
has defined a species as ‘‘any subspecies
of fish or wildlife or plants, and any
distinct population segment of any
species of vertebrate fish or wildlife
which interbreeds when mature’’ (16
U.S.C. 1532(16)). Guidance on what
constitutes a distinct population
segment (DPS) is provided by the joint
NMFS-USFWS interagency DPS policy
(61 FR 4722; February 7, 1996). In order
to be classified as a DPS, a vertebrate
population must meet two criteria discreteness and significance. A
population, or group of populations,
must first be ‘‘discrete’’ from other
populations and then ‘‘significant’’ to
the taxon (species or subspecies) to
which it belongs.
According to the joint DPS policy, a
population segment may be considered
discrete if it satisfies either one of the
following conditions: (1) it is markedly
separated from other populations of the
same biological taxon as a consequence
of physical, physiological, ecological, or
behavioral factors (quantitative
measures of genetic or morphological
discontinuity may provide evidence of
this separation); or (2) it is delimited by
international governmental boundaries
across which there is a significant
difference in exploitation control,
habitat management or conservation
status. If a population is determined to
be discrete, the agency must then
consider whether it is significant to the
taxon to which it belongs. When
evaluating the significance of a discrete
population, we consider the following:
(1) persistence of the discrete
population in an unusual or unique
ecological setting for the taxon; (2)
evidence that the loss of the discrete
population segment would cause a
significant gap in the taxon’s range; (3)
evidence that the discrete population
segment represents the only surviving
natural occurrence of a taxon that may
be more abundant elsewhere outside its
historical geographic range; or (4)
evidence that the discrete population
has marked genetic differences from
other populations of the species.
We considered several types of data
and information when evaluating the
DPS structure and discreteness of
populations of Pacific herring in Lynn
Canal and the eastern North Pacific.
This information included: geographic
variability in life-history characteristics,
physiology, and morphology; ecosystem
and oceanographic conditions; spawn
timing and locations; tagging and
recapture studies that would indicate
the extent of migration and
intermingling among stocks; and studies
of genetic differentiation among stocks
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 71 (Friday, April 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19822-19824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-7821]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XH15
Notice of Availability of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement
and Habitat Conservation Plan
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce
ACTION: Notice; availability of documents for public comment and public
hearings.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) and draft habitat conservation
plan (HCP) for public review and comment. The City of Portland (City)
has submitted an application to the National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) for an incidental take permit under section 10 of the Endangered
Species Act (ESA) of 1973 as amended. The HCP also serves as the basis
of an application to NMFS that they take steps under the ESA to limit
the application of the prohibition against take of listed salmon and
steelhead so that it does not apply to the continued operation and
maintenance of the Bull Run water supply system.
DATES: Written comments on the draft HCP, Implementation Agreement and
DEIS will be accepted for a period of 60 days, ending at 5 p.m. Pacific
Time on May 27, 2008. Written comments may be sent by mail, facsimile,
or e-mail to the addresses listed below.
ADDRESSES: Please address written comments to Nancy Munn, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd, Suite 1100, Portland,
Oregon 97232, facsimile (503) 231-6893. Please send e-mail comments to:
BullRunHCP.nwr@noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, or to receive
the documents on CD ROM, please contact Nancy Munn, Project Manager,
National Marine Fisheries Service, (503) 231-6269.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The documents being made available include:
(1) the proposed habitat
[[Page 19823]]
conservation plan; (2) the proposed Implementing Agreement; and (3) the
draft environmental impact statement (DEIS). This notice is provided
pursuant to the ESA and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, as amended. The NMFS is furnishing this notice to allow other
agencies and the public an opportunity to review and comment on these
documents. All comments received will become part of the public record
for this action. Hard bound copies of the conservation plan,
Implementation Agreement, and DEIS are available for viewing, or
partial or complete duplication, at all Oregon State libraries and the
main Multnomah County Library in Portland, Oregon.
Background
Section 9 of the ESA and Federal regulations prohibit the
unauthorized ``taking'' of a species listed as endangered or
threatened. The term take is defined under the ESA to mean harass,
harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or
to attempt to engage in any such conduct. Harm is defined to include
significant habitat modification or degradation where it actually kills
or injures wildlife by significantly impairing essential behavioral
patterns, including breeding, feeding, and sheltering (50 CFR 17.3, 50
CFR 222.102). NMFS further defines harm to include significant habitat
modification or degradation where it actually kills or injures fish or
wildlife by significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns,
including breeding, feeding, spawning, migrating, rearing, and
sheltering (64 FR 60727). The NMFS may issue incidental take permits,
under section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA, to take listed species incidental
to, and not the purpose of, otherwise lawful activities. NMFS
regulations governing permits for federally endangered and threatened
species are promulgated under 50 CFR 222.307. NMFS also may issue a
rule under section 4(d) of the ESA, providing for the conservation of
threatened species while authorizing incidental take under certain
conditions. The Bull Run watershed has been used by the City for water
supply since 1895. The City's water system provides water to residents
and businesses within the City as well as to a number of surrounding
communities. As a result of the listing of several salmon and steelhead
species in Oregon State in the mid to late 1990s, the City was
concerned about compliance with the ESA and other Federal regulations,
and water supply reliability and affordability. The presence and
operation of the water system infrastructure creates impacts on habitat
for several species of listed fish because of changes in river flow,
river temperature, and aquatic and riparian habitat. The City's
conservation plan includes 49 habitat conservation measures to protect
and improve water quality and habitat for aquatic species within the
boundaries of the Sandy River Basin.
The City has applied to: (1) obtain an incidental take permit,
pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA for endangered, threatened
and covered species; and, (2) request from the NMFS a limitation on the
application of the prohibition against take, pursuant to section 4(d)
of the ESA for identified threatened species only, for activities
associated with the continued operation and maintenance of the Bull Run
water supply system. The activities associated with the continued
operation and maintenance of the Bull Run water supply system are
described in the draft HCP and Implementing Agreement and serve as
documentation that the conservation plan meets the requirements of
section 4(d) as well as section 10. Each of these activities is
represented as an alternative in the DEIS. Activities proposed for
coverage under the incidental take permits or for a limitation on the
application of the prohibition against take include the following: (1)
operation, maintenance, and repair of the water system; (2)
implementation of habitat conservation, research, and monitoring
measures; and (3) incidental land management activities. The proposed
incidental take permits would authorize the take of the following
federally threatened species incidental to otherwise lawful activities:
Lower Columbia River chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus shawytscha), Lower
Columbia River steelhead (O. mykiss), Lower Columbia River coho salmon
(O. keta), and Columbia River chum salmon (O. keta).
The draft HCP also includes conservation measures and effects
analyses for 18 fish and wildlife species under the jurisdiction of the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The species included are those most
likely to be affected by water system operations and/or benefited by
measures designed for the anadromous fish.
The proposed duration of the incidental take permit and
conservation plan would be 50 years, though many aspects of the plan's
conservation strategy are intended to benefit aquatic species and their
habitat long into the future. The NMFS formally initiated an
environmental review of the project through publication of a Notice of
Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement in the Federal
Register on March 27, 2006 (71 FR 15168). That document also announced
a public scoping period during which interested parties were invited to
provide written comments expressing their issues or concerns relating
to the proposal and to attend one of two public scoping meetings held
in Portland, Oregon. Based on public scoping comments, NMFS has
prepared a DEIS to analyze the effects of alternatives on the human
environment. Implementation of the City's conservation plan, including
issuance of the associated incidental take permits from NMFS for
threatened species is Alternative 2 in the DEIS. Three other
alternatives are analyzed in the DEIS including: Alternative 1, no
action, in that the incidental take permit would not be issued to the
City; and Alternative 3, providing fish passage facilities at the two
dams on the Bull Run River.
This document is provided pursuant to the ESA and NEPA regulations.
NMFS will evaluate the application, associated documents, and comments
submitted thereon to determine whether the applications meet the
requirements of the ESA and NEPA. The NMFS will revise the DEIS in a
Final Environmental Impact Statement. The NMFS' decisions whether to
issue an incidental take permit or limits on the application of the
prohibition against take will be made upon completion of the Endangered
Species Act determinations and Final Environmental Impact Statement and
associated Record of Decision.
Public Meetings
The NMFS has scheduled two public meetings to receive comments from
the public concerning the DEIS and draft HCP. (1) Monday April 28,
2008, 5:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m., East Portland Community Center,
Multipurpose Room 1, 740 SE 106th Ave, Portland, Oregon(2) Tuesday,
April 29, 2008, 5:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m., Lovejoy Room, Portland City
Hall, 1221 SW 4th Ave., Portland, Oregon.
Special Accommodations
These meetings are physically accessible to people with
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should be directed to Nancy Munn, (503) 231-6893 at
least 5 working days prior to the meeting date.
[[Page 19824]]
Dated: April 7, 2008.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8-7821 Filed 4-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S