Central Utah Project Completion Act, 19866-19867 [E8-7810]
Download as PDF
19866
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 71 / Friday, April 11, 2008 / Notices
On August
21, 2007, CBP published a general
notice in the Federal Register (72 FR
46654) announcing a modification of the
PEA test. The PEA test procedure allows
test participants (importers) to amend
entry summaries (not informal entries)
prior to liquidation by filing with CBP
either a single PEA upon discovery of
certain kinds of errors or a quarterly
tracking report covering certain other
errors that occurred during the quarter.
The test modification, which became
effective on September 20, 2007,
concerned the timeliness of filing single
PEAs. Prior to the modification, the test
participant was required to file a single
PEA promptly after discovery of a
covered error and prior to the
liquidation of the subject entry
summary. The test procedure as
modified requires that a single PEA be
filed at least 20 days before the
scheduled liquidation date of the
subject entry summary.
The modification notice explained
that an untimely filed single PEA would
be rejected and a timely filed single PEA
would be treated by CBP as a protest
under 19 U.S.C. 1514 in any instance
where the entry summaries are not
unset or processed by the scheduled
liquidation date and liquidation
therefore occurs without benefit of the
requested amendment.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Correction
Under 19 U.S.C. 1514, a protest must
be filed within a certain period after, not
before, certain specified CBP actions,
one of which is liquidation of the entry
summary. To treat a single PEA filed
prior to the liquidation, as described
above, as a protest of the liquidation is
contrary to the terms of the statute.
Therefore, this notice specifies that in
the instance of such liquidation,
performed without consideration of the
PEA, CBP may reliquidate the entry
summary voluntarily under 19 U.S.C.
1501 or the importer may file a protest
under 19 U.S.C. 1514.
Dated: April 7, 2008.
Daniel Baldwin,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of
International Trade.
[FR Doc. E8–7695 Filed 4–10–08; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:21 Apr 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5186–N–15]
Federal Property Suitable as Facilities
To Assist the Homeless
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This Notice identifies
unutilized, underutilized, excess, and
surplus Federal property reviewed by
HUD for suitability for possible use to
assist the homeless.
DATES: Effective Date: April 11, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington,
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708–1234;
TTY number for the hearing- and
speech-impaired (202) 708–2565, (these
telephone numbers are not toll-free), or
call the toll-free Title V information line
at 800–927–7588.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with the December 12, 1988,
court order in National Coalition for the
Homeless v. Veterans Administration,
No. 88–2503–OG (D.D.C.), HUD
publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis,
identifying unutilized, underutilized,
excess and surplus Federal buildings
and real property that HUD has
reviewed for suitability for use to assist
the homeless. Today’s Notice is for the
purpose of announcing that no
additional properties have been
determined suitable or unsuitable this
week.
Dated: April 3, 2008.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. E8–7415 Filed 4–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–M
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
UTAH RECLAMATION MITIGATION
AND CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Central Utah Project Completion Act
AGENCIES: Department of the Interior.
Office of the Assistant Secretary—Water
and Science (Interior); and the Utah
Reclamation Mitigation and
Conservation Commission (Mitigation
Commission).
ACTION: Notice of Availability, Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS),
Lower Duchesne River Wetlands
Mitigation Project (LDWP), Duchesne
and Uintah Counties, Utah.
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(c)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended,
Interior and the Mitigation Commission
(Joint Lead Agencies), have issued a
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(FEIS) for the Lower Duchesne River
Wetlands Mitigation Project in
Duchesne and Uintah Counties, Utah.
The FEIS addresses potential impacts
related to construction and operation of
features proposed for the project and
incorporates responses to public
comments received on the Draft EIS.
The FEIS is intended to satisfy
disclosure requirements of NEPA and
will serve as the NEPA compliance
document for contracts, agreements and
permits that would be required for
construction and operation of the
project.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Additional information on matters
related to this notice can be obtained
from Mr. Ralph G. Swanson at (801)
379–1254, or rswanson@uc.usbr.gov.
Copies of the FEIS, and supporting
resource technical reports, are available
upon request.
Copies of the FEIS are also available
for inspection at:
Utah Reclamation Mitigation and
Conservation Commission, 230 South
500 East, Suite 230, Salt Lake City,
Utah 84102;
Department of the Interior, Natural
Resource Library, Serials Branch, 18th
and C Streets, NW., Washington, DC
20240;
Headquarters, Ute Indian Tribe of the
Uintah and Ouray Agency, 988 South
7500 East, Ft. Duchesne, Utah 84026;
Bureau of Indian Affairs, P.O. Box 130,
Ft. Duchesne, Utah 84026;
Duchesne County Library, 70 East
Lagoon, Roosevelt, Utah 84066;
and on the Mitigation Commission Web
site at: www.mitigationcommission.com.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background—The LDWP is proposed to
fulfill certain environmental mitigation
commitments of the Bonneville Unit of
the Central Utah Project. The Strawberry
Aqueduct and Collection System
(SACS) is a key component of the
Bonneville Unit, collecting water from
the Upper Duchesne River and its
tributaries and storing it in Strawberry
Reservoir for delivery westward to the
Wasatch Front in Utah. As a result,
wetlands and wildlife habitats along the
Duchesne River have been adversely
impacted. Substantial wetland impacts
occurred on the Uintah and Ouray
Reservation lands of the Ute Indian
Tribe. The Proposed Action would
create, restore, and otherwise enhance
riparian wetland habitats on reservation
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 71 / Friday, April 11, 2008 / Notices
lands of the Ute Indian Tribe along the
Duchesne River in Utah as partial
mitigation for these Bonneville Unit
impacts. The LDWP has been planned
in conjunction with the Ute Indian
Tribe and is intended to fulfill a longstanding commitment to mitigate for
impacts to Ute Indian tribal wetlandwildlife resources and to provide
additional wetland/wildlife benefits to
the Ute Indian Tribe.
Notice of Intent to initiate public
scoping and prepare a Draft EIS was
published in the Federal Register on
April 25, 2001 (66 FR 20827). Scoping
was accomplished by means of three
public meetings convened in Ft.
Duchesne, Roosevelt and Salt Lake City,
Utah in May 2003. The DEIS was filed
with the EPA by the Joint Lead Agencies
on November 17, 2003. Notice of
Availability of the DEIS was announced
in the Federal Register on November 24,
2003 (68 FR 65943). Three public
meetings were held in Ft. Duchesne,
Roosevelt and Salt Lake City, Utah in
December 2003, to receive public
comment on the DEIS. Comments
received during the public comment
period from November 17, 2003 to
February 17, 2004, were considered
during preparation of the FEIS.
Publication of a Record of Decision
for the LDWP will occur no sooner than
30 days from the date of this notice.
Proposed Action—Approximately
4,807 acres of land composed of 3,215
acres of Ute Indian Tribal trust lands,
and 1,592 acres of fee lands to be
acquired by the Federal Government,
would be acquired and/or developed
into cohesive wetlands management
units. A portion of the water currently
managed by the Bureau of Indian Affairs
for the Ute Indian Tribe under the
existing Uinta Indian Irrigation Project
would be utilized, along with water that
may be acquired with fee land
acquisitions, to create, restore and
enhance wetlands throughout the
project area. Lands acquired in fee title
(except lands acquired by eminent
domain) would be transferred to the Ute
Indian Tribe. All project lands
(dedicated tribal and acquired lands)
would be managed for project purposes
by the Ute Indian Tribe under
management agreements with the Joint
Lead Agencies to achieve the prescribed
wetlands-associated fish and wildlife
benefits, and for other wetland/wildliferelated tribal benefits.
Alternatives—Two action alternatives
were developed and evaluated. The
alternatives included in the FEIS are
similar to the Proposed Action, differing
only in the acreage amounts and
locations.
No Action—No lands or waters would
be acquired or managed for wetland
habitat improvements or tribal benefits.
This Central Utah Project, Bonneville
Unit mitigation commitment to the Ute
Indian Tribe would remain unfulfilled.
The Commission would undertake
additional planning to develop an
acceptable alternative means to
complete this mitigation commitment.
Reed R. Murray,
Program Director, Department of the Interior.
Michael C. Weland,
Executive Director, Utah Reclamation
Mitigation and Conservation Commission.
[FR Doc. E8–7810 Filed 4–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–RK–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Information Collection Sent to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for Approval; OMB Control No.
1018–0123; International Conservation
Grant Programs
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We (Fish and Wildlife
Service) have sent an Information
Number of annual
respondents
Activity
19867
Collection Request (ICR) to OMB for
review and approval. This ICR revises
OMB Control No. 1018–0123 to include
our new Wildlife Without Borders
Africa Grant Program. The ICR, which is
summarized below, describes the nature
of the collection and the estimated
burden and cost. We may not conduct
or sponsor and a person is not required
to respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
DATES: You must submit comments on
or before May 12, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments and
suggestions on this ICR to the Desk
Officer for the Department of the
Interior at OMB-OIRA at (202) 395–6566
(fax) or OIRA_DOCKET@OMB.eop.gov
(e-mail). Please provide a copy of your
comments to Hope Grey, Information
Collection Clearance Officer, Fish and
Wildlife Service, MS 222–ARLSQ, 4401
North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA
22203 (mail); (703) 358–2269 (fax); or
hope_grey@fws.gov (e-mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request additional information about
this ICR, contact Hope Grey by mail, fax,
or e-mail (see ADDRESSES) or by
telephone at (703) 358–2482.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 1018–0123.
Title: International Conservation
Grant Programs.
Service Form Number(s): 3–2338.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Domestic and
nondomestic Federal, State, and local
governments; nonprofit,
nongovernmental organizations; public
and private institutions of higher
education; and any other organization or
individual with demonstrated
experience deemed necessary to carry
out the proposed project.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain a benefit.
Frequency of Collection: Annually.
Number of annual
responses
Completion time
per response
Annual burden
hours
539*
126*
539
252
12 hours ..........
30 hours ..........
6,468
7,560
Totals ................................................................................
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Grant Application (cover page and narrative) .........................
Report (mid-term and final) .....................................................
665
791
.....................
14,028
*Of the 539 applicants, we estimate
that 137 will be domestic and 402 will
be nondomestic. Of the 126 grantees
submitting reports, we estimate that 32
will be domestic and 94 will be
nondomestic.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:21 Apr 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
Abstract: The Division of
International Conservation awards
grants funded under the:
(1) African Elephant Conservation Act
(16 U.S.C. 4201–4245).
(2) Asian Elephant Conservation Act
of 1997 (16 U.S.C. 4261).
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(3) Great Apes Conservation Act of
2000 (Pub. L. 106–411).
(4) Rhinoceros and Tiger Conservation
Act of 1994 (16 U.S.C. 5306).
(5) Marine Turtle Conservation Act
(Pub. L. 108–266).
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 71 (Friday, April 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19866-19867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-7810]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
UTAH RECLAMATION MITIGATION AND CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Central Utah Project Completion Act
AGENCIES: Department of the Interior. Office of the Assistant
Secretary--Water and Science (Interior); and the Utah Reclamation
Mitigation and Conservation Commission (Mitigation Commission).
ACTION: Notice of Availability, Final Environmental Impact Statement
(FEIS), Lower Duchesne River Wetlands Mitigation Project (LDWP),
Duchesne and Uintah Counties, Utah.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended, Interior and the Mitigation
Commission (Joint Lead Agencies), have issued a Final Environmental
Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Lower Duchesne River Wetlands
Mitigation Project in Duchesne and Uintah Counties, Utah. The FEIS
addresses potential impacts related to construction and operation of
features proposed for the project and incorporates responses to public
comments received on the Draft EIS.
The FEIS is intended to satisfy disclosure requirements of NEPA and
will serve as the NEPA compliance document for contracts, agreements
and permits that would be required for construction and operation of
the project.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Additional information on matters
related to this notice can be obtained from Mr. Ralph G. Swanson at
(801) 379-1254, or rswanson@uc.usbr.gov. Copies of the FEIS, and
supporting resource technical reports, are available upon request.
Copies of the FEIS are also available for inspection at:
Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission, 230 South 500
East, Suite 230, Salt Lake City, Utah 84102;
Department of the Interior, Natural Resource Library, Serials Branch,
18th and C Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20240;
Headquarters, Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Agency, 988
South 7500 East, Ft. Duchesne, Utah 84026;
Bureau of Indian Affairs, P.O. Box 130, Ft. Duchesne, Utah 84026;
Duchesne County Library, 70 East Lagoon, Roosevelt, Utah 84066;
and on the Mitigation Commission Web site at:
www.mitigationcommission.com.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background--The LDWP is proposed to fulfill
certain environmental mitigation commitments of the Bonneville Unit of
the Central Utah Project. The Strawberry Aqueduct and Collection System
(SACS) is a key component of the Bonneville Unit, collecting water from
the Upper Duchesne River and its tributaries and storing it in
Strawberry Reservoir for delivery westward to the Wasatch Front in
Utah. As a result, wetlands and wildlife habitats along the Duchesne
River have been adversely impacted. Substantial wetland impacts
occurred on the Uintah and Ouray Reservation lands of the Ute Indian
Tribe. The Proposed Action would create, restore, and otherwise enhance
riparian wetland habitats on reservation
[[Page 19867]]
lands of the Ute Indian Tribe along the Duchesne River in Utah as
partial mitigation for these Bonneville Unit impacts. The LDWP has been
planned in conjunction with the Ute Indian Tribe and is intended to
fulfill a long-standing commitment to mitigate for impacts to Ute
Indian tribal wetland-wildlife resources and to provide additional
wetland/wildlife benefits to the Ute Indian Tribe.
Notice of Intent to initiate public scoping and prepare a Draft EIS
was published in the Federal Register on April 25, 2001 (66 FR 20827).
Scoping was accomplished by means of three public meetings convened in
Ft. Duchesne, Roosevelt and Salt Lake City, Utah in May 2003. The DEIS
was filed with the EPA by the Joint Lead Agencies on November 17, 2003.
Notice of Availability of the DEIS was announced in the Federal
Register on November 24, 2003 (68 FR 65943). Three public meetings were
held in Ft. Duchesne, Roosevelt and Salt Lake City, Utah in December
2003, to receive public comment on the DEIS. Comments received during
the public comment period from November 17, 2003 to February 17, 2004,
were considered during preparation of the FEIS.
Publication of a Record of Decision for the LDWP will occur no
sooner than 30 days from the date of this notice.
Proposed Action--Approximately 4,807 acres of land composed of
3,215 acres of Ute Indian Tribal trust lands, and 1,592 acres of fee
lands to be acquired by the Federal Government, would be acquired and/
or developed into cohesive wetlands management units. A portion of the
water currently managed by the Bureau of Indian Affairs for the Ute
Indian Tribe under the existing Uinta Indian Irrigation Project would
be utilized, along with water that may be acquired with fee land
acquisitions, to create, restore and enhance wetlands throughout the
project area. Lands acquired in fee title (except lands acquired by
eminent domain) would be transferred to the Ute Indian Tribe. All
project lands (dedicated tribal and acquired lands) would be managed
for project purposes by the Ute Indian Tribe under management
agreements with the Joint Lead Agencies to achieve the prescribed
wetlands-associated fish and wildlife benefits, and for other wetland/
wildlife-related tribal benefits.
Alternatives--Two action alternatives were developed and evaluated.
The alternatives included in the FEIS are similar to the Proposed
Action, differing only in the acreage amounts and locations.
No Action--No lands or waters would be acquired or managed for
wetland habitat improvements or tribal benefits. This Central Utah
Project, Bonneville Unit mitigation commitment to the Ute Indian Tribe
would remain unfulfilled. The Commission would undertake additional
planning to develop an acceptable alternative means to complete this
mitigation commitment.
Reed R. Murray,
Program Director, Department of the Interior.
Michael C. Weland,
Executive Director, Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation
Commission.
[FR Doc. E8-7810 Filed 4-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P