Notice of Application for Approval of Discontinuance or Modification of a Railroad Signal System or Relief From the Requirements of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 236, 19929 [E8-7659]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 71 / Friday, April 11, 2008 / Notices
Bennett, Lee A. Burke, Barton C.
Caldara, Charlie F. Cook, Allan Darley,
John K. DeGolier, Robin S. England,
Richard Hailey, Jr., Robert V. Hodges,
George R. Knavel, John R. Knott, III,
John K. Love, Roger D. Mollak, Edward
D. Pickle, Ezequiel M. Ramirez, Kent S.
Reining, James L. Schmitt, Earl W.
Sheets, Thomas E. Voyles, Jr., and James
T. Wortham, Jr.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315, each renewal exemption will
be valid for 2 years unless revoked
earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will
be revoked if: (1) The person fails to
comply with the terms and conditions
of the exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than
was maintained before it was granted; or
(3) continuation of the exemption would
not be consistent with the goals and
objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315.
Issued on: April 4, 2008.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. E8–7666 Filed 4–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Notice of Application for Approval of
Discontinuance or Modification of a
Railroad Signal System or Relief From
the Requirements of Title 49 Code of
Federal Regulations Part 236
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) Part 235 and 49
U.S.C. 20502(a), the following railroad
has petitioned the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) seeking approval
for the discontinuance or modification
of the signal system or relief from the
requirements of 49 CFR Part 236, as
detailed below.
Docket Number FRA–2008–0016
Applicant: Union Pacific Railroad
Company, Mr. John J. Hovanec, AVP
Engineering Design, 1400 Douglas
Street, Stop 0910, Omaha, Nebraska
68179.
The Union Pacific Railroad Company
(UP) seeks approval of the proposed
discontinuance and removal of the
block signal system on the UP Granville
Industrial Lead between Mileposts 92.4
and 99.5, from Wiscona through
Granville, Wisconsin. Train movements
on the affected portion of track will be
governed by UP Rule 6.28.
The reason given for the proposed
changes is that the block signal system
is no longer needed for safe train
operation.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:21 Apr 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
Any interested party desiring to
protest the granting of an application
shall set forth specifically the grounds
upon which the protest is made, and
include a concise statement of the
interest of the party in the proceeding.
Additionally, one copy of the protest
shall be furnished to the applicant at the
address listed above.
FRA expects to be able to determine
these matters without an oral hearing.
However, if a specific request for an oral
hearing is accompanied by a showing
that the party is unable to adequately
present his or her position by written
statements, an application may be set
for public hearing.
All communications concerning this
proceeding should be identified by
Docket Number FRA–2008–0016 and
may be submitted by one of the
following methods:
Web site: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for
submitting comments.
Fax: 202–493–2251.
Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Communications received within 45
days of the date of this notice will be
considered by FRA before final action is
taken. Comments received after that
date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) at the
above facility. All documents in the
public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet
at the docket facility’s Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov.
FRA wishes to inform all potential
commenters that anyone is able to
search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our
dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the
comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT’s complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477–
78) or you may visit https://
www.regulations.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00128
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19929
Issued in Washington, DC on April 7, 2008.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E8–7659 Filed 4–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Notice of Application for Approval of
Discontinuance or Modification of a
Railroad Signal System or Relief From
the Requirements of Title 49 Code of
Federal Regulations Part 236
Pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) Part 235 and 49
U.S.C. 20502(a), the following railroad
has petitioned the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) seeking approval
for the discontinuance or modification
of the signal system or relief from the
requirements of 49 CFR Part 236, as
detailed below.
Docket Number FRA–2008–0024
Applicant: BNSF Railway, Mr. Ralph
Young, Director Signal Engineering,
4515 Kansas Avenue, Kansas City,
Kansas 66106–1199.
The BNSF Railway (BNSF) seeks
approval of the proposed
discontinuance and removal of two
operative approach signals. The
operative approach signals are located
on the Freight Lead, Signal No. 2E, and
on the Fuel Lead, Signal No. 1E, at
Jarales Control Point in Belen, New
Mexico, on the Southwest Division,
Clovis Subdivision (LS 7100, Milepost
895.31). The reason for the proposed
changes is that new absolute signals at
Jarales Control Point were installed on
a signal bridge and their preview is no
longer an issue. In addition, the
operative approach signals may be
creating operational confusion for the
train crews.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (Docket
Number FRA–2008–0024) and may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 71 (Friday, April 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 19929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-7659]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Notice of Application for Approval of Discontinuance or
Modification of a Railroad Signal System or Relief From the
Requirements of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 236
Pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 235 and
49 U.S.C. 20502(a), the following railroad has petitioned the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) seeking approval for the discontinuance
or modification of the signal system or relief from the requirements of
49 CFR Part 236, as detailed below.
Docket Number FRA-2008-0016
Applicant: Union Pacific Railroad Company, Mr. John J. Hovanec, AVP
Engineering Design, 1400 Douglas Street, Stop 0910, Omaha, Nebraska
68179.
The Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) seeks approval of the
proposed discontinuance and removal of the block signal system on the
UP Granville Industrial Lead between Mileposts 92.4 and 99.5, from
Wiscona through Granville, Wisconsin. Train movements on the affected
portion of track will be governed by UP Rule 6.28.
The reason given for the proposed changes is that the block signal
system is no longer needed for safe train operation.
Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of an
application shall set forth specifically the grounds upon which the
protest is made, and include a concise statement of the interest of the
party in the proceeding. Additionally, one copy of the protest shall be
furnished to the applicant at the address listed above.
FRA expects to be able to determine these matters without an oral
hearing. However, if a specific request for an oral hearing is
accompanied by a showing that the party is unable to adequately present
his or her position by written statements, an application may be set
for public hearing.
All communications concerning this proceeding should be identified
by Docket Number FRA-2008-0016 and may be submitted by one of the
following methods:
Web site: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Communications received within 45 days of the date of this notice
will be considered by FRA before final action is taken. Comments
received after that date will be considered as far as practicable. All
written communications concerning these proceedings are available for
examination during regular business hours (9 a.m.-5 p.m.) at the above
facility. All documents in the public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet at the docket facility's Web
site at https://www.regulations.gov.
FRA wishes to inform all potential commenters that anyone is able
to search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our
dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78) or you may visit https://
www.regulations.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC on April 7, 2008.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program
Development.
[FR Doc. E8-7659 Filed 4-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P