Damage Tolerance and Fatigue Evaluation of Structure, 19746 [E8-7649]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
19746
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 71 / Friday, April 11, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
members, producers, handlers, and
other interested persons. In addition,
the rule was made available through the
Internet by USDA and the Office of the
Federal Register. That rule provided for
a 60-day comment period which ended
February 15, 2008. No comments were
received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
Committee’s recommendation, and
other information, it is found that
finalizing this interim final rule,
without change, as published in the
Federal Register (72 FR 71199) will
tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 985
Marketing agreements, Oils and fats,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Spearmint oil.
I For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 985 is amended as
follows:
PART 985—MARKETING ORDER
REGULATING THE HANDLING OF
SPEARMINT OIL PRODUCED IN THE
FAR WEST
Accordingly, the interim final rule
amending 7 CFR part 985, which was
published at 72 FR 71199 on December
17, 2007, is adopted as a final rule
without change.
Dated: April 8, 2008.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E8–7866 Filed 4–10–08; 8:45 am]
final rule, Airworthiness Standards;
Airframe Rules Based on European Joint
Aviation Requirements, which the FAA
published in the Federal Register on
February 9, 1996. In that final rule, the
FAA inadvertently changed a paragraph
reference. The intent of this action is to
correct the error in the regulation to
ensure the requirement is clear and
accurate.
DATES: Effective Date: April 11, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pat
Mullen, Regulations and Policy, ACE–
111, Federal Aviation Administration,
901 Locust Street, Kansas City, MO
64106; telephone (816) 329–4111; e-mail
pat.mullen@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
February 9, 1996, the FAA published in
the Federal Register (61 FR 5147) a final
rule that amended § 23.573(b) by
removing the reference ‘‘§ 23.571(c)’’
and adding the reference
‘‘§ 23.571(a)(3)’’ in its place. Paragraph
(a)(3) of § 23.571 does not exist, and the
reference to § 23.571(c) should have
remained. This document corrects
§ 23.573(b) to reflect the correct
paragraph reference, § 23.571(c). This
correction will not impose any
additional requirements.
Technical Amendment
This technical amendment will
correct § 23.573(b) to properly reference
§ 23.571(c).
Justification for Immediate Adoption
Because this action corrects an
incorrect paragraph reference, the FAA
finds that notice and public comment
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) is unnecessary.
For the same reason, the FAA finds that
good cause exists under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)
for making this rule effective upon
publication.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and
symbols.
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
The Amendment
Accordingly, Title 14 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part 23 is
amended as follows:
I
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
PART 23—AIRWORTHINESS
STANDARDS: NORMAL, UTILITY,
ACROBATIC, AND COMMUTER
CATEGORY AIRPLANES
14 CFR Part 23
Damage Tolerance and Fatigue
Evaluation of Structure
1. The authority citation for part 23
continues to read as follows:
I
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; technical
amendment.
ebenthall on PRODPC61 with RULES
AGENCY:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40013, 44701,
44702, 44704.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:23 Apr 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
2. Amend § 23.573 by revising the first
sentence in paragraph (b) introductory
text to read as follows:
I
This action corrects a
paragraph reference that appeared in the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 23.573 Damage tolerance and fatigue
evaluation of structure.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Metallic airframe structure. If the
applicant elects to use § 23.571(c) or
§ 23.572(a)(3), then the damage
tolerance evaluation must include a
determination of the probable locations
and modes of damage due to fatigue,
corrosion, or accidental damage. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 7,
2008.
Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. E8–7649 Filed 4–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[USCG–2008–0228]
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Norwalk River, Norwalk, CT
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commander, First Coast
Guard District, has issued a temporary
deviation from the regulations
governing the operation of the
Washington Street S136 Bridge, across
the Norwalk River, mile 0.0, at Norwalk,
Connecticut. While in effect, this
deviation allows the bridge owner to
open only one of the two moveable
spans for bridge openings. Vessels that
require a full two-span bridge opening
will be required to provide at least a
twelve-hour advance notice by calling
the bridge operator. This deviation is
necessary to facilitate scheduled bridge
maintenance.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
April 1, 2008 through April 30, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2008–
0228 and are available online at https://
www.regulations.gov. They are also
available for inspection or copying at
two locations: the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays,
and the First Coast Guard District,
Bridge Branch Office, One South Street,
New York, New York, 10004, between 7
E:\FR\FM\11APR1.SGM
11APR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 71 (Friday, April 11, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 19746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-7649]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 23
Damage Tolerance and Fatigue Evaluation of Structure
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action corrects a paragraph reference that appeared in
the final rule, Airworthiness Standards; Airframe Rules Based on
European Joint Aviation Requirements, which the FAA published in the
Federal Register on February 9, 1996. In that final rule, the FAA
inadvertently changed a paragraph reference. The intent of this action
is to correct the error in the regulation to ensure the requirement is
clear and accurate.
DATES: Effective Date: April 11, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pat Mullen, Regulations and Policy,
ACE-111, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust Street, Kansas
City, MO 64106; telephone (816) 329-4111; e-mail pat.mullen@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 9, 1996, the FAA published in
the Federal Register (61 FR 5147) a final rule that amended Sec.
23.573(b) by removing the reference ``Sec. 23.571(c)'' and adding the
reference ``Sec. 23.571(a)(3)'' in its place. Paragraph (a)(3) of
Sec. 23.571 does not exist, and the reference to Sec. 23.571(c)
should have remained. This document corrects Sec. 23.573(b) to reflect
the correct paragraph reference, Sec. 23.571(c). This correction will
not impose any additional requirements.
Technical Amendment
This technical amendment will correct Sec. 23.573(b) to properly
reference Sec. 23.571(c).
Justification for Immediate Adoption
Because this action corrects an incorrect paragraph reference, the
FAA finds that notice and public comment under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) is
unnecessary. For the same reason, the FAA finds that good cause exists
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d) for making this rule effective upon publication.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and symbols.
The Amendment
0
Accordingly, Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 23
is amended as follows:
PART 23--AIRWORTHINESS STANDARDS: NORMAL, UTILITY, ACROBATIC, AND
COMMUTER CATEGORY AIRPLANES
0
1. The authority citation for part 23 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40013, 44701, 44702, 44704.
0
2. Amend Sec. 23.573 by revising the first sentence in paragraph (b)
introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 23.573 Damage tolerance and fatigue evaluation of structure.
* * * * *
(b) Metallic airframe structure. If the applicant elects to use
Sec. 23.571(c) or Sec. 23.572(a)(3), then the damage tolerance
evaluation must include a determination of the probable locations and
modes of damage due to fatigue, corrosion, or accidental damage. * * *
* * * * *
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 7, 2008.
Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. E8-7649 Filed 4-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
