Approval and Promulgation of State Air Quality Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants; State of Maryland; Control of Large Municipal Waste Combustor (LMWC) Emissions From Existing Facilities, 18968-18970 [E8-7347]
Download as PDF
18968
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 8, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED NORTH CAROLINA NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS
Provision
*
State effective date
*
*
1-Hour Ozone Maintenance plan revision
for the Greensboro/Winston-Salem/
High Point area (Davidson, Forsyth,
and Guilford counties and a portion of
Davie County).
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA–R03–OAR–2008–MD–0209; FRL–
8552–5]
Approval and Promulgation of State
Air Quality Plans for Designated
Facilities and Pollutants; State of
Maryland; Control of Large Municipal
Waste Combustor (LMWC) Emissions
From Existing Facilities
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action to approve the Maryland
Department of the Environment (MDE)
large municipal waste combustor plan
(the plan) revision for implementing
emission guideline (EG) amendments
promulgated on May 10, 2006 by EPA
under the Clean Air Act (the Act). The
plan revision establishes revised
emission limits, monitoring, and
recordkeeping requirements for existing
LMWC units with a unit capacity greater
than 250 tons per day (TPD). An
existing LMWC unit is one for which
construction commenced on or before
September 20, 1994.
DATES: This rule is effective June 9, 2008
without further notice, unless EPA
receives adverse written comment by
May 8, 2008. If EPA receives such
comments, it will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2008–0209 by one of the
following methods:
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. E-mail: https://
wilkie.walter@epa.gov.
16:20 Apr 07, 2008
Jkt 214001
*
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
*
April 8, 2008 ..............................
C. Mail: EPA—R03 OAR–2008 MD–
0209, Walter Wilkie, Chief, Air Quality
Analysis Branch, Mailcode 3AP22, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2008–
MD–0209. EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change, and
may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or e-mail. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an e-mail
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although
PO 00000
Federal Register citation
*
February 4, 2008 ......................
[FR Doc. E8–7186 Filed 4–7–08; 8:45 am]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
EPA approval date
Sfmt 4700
*
[Insert first page of publication].
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business
hours at the Air Protection Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Maryland Department of
the Environment, 1800 Washington
Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore,
Maryland, 21230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James B. Topsale, P.E., at (215) 814–
2190, or by e-mail at
topsale.jim@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 129(a)(5) of the Clean Air Act
(the Act) requires EPA to conduct a 5year review of the solid waste
incinerator new source performance
standards (NSPS) and emission
guidelines (EG) and revise both, as
appropriate. Accordingly, in the May
10, 2006 edition of the Federal Register,
EPA promulgated revised LMWC rules
under sections 111 and 129 of the Act.
EG for existing affected facilities are not
federally enforceable. However, section
129(b)(2) of the Act requires States to
submit to EPA for approval State Plans
and revisions that implement and
enforce the amended EG, in this case, 40
CFR part 60, subpart Cb. State Plans and
revisions must be at least as protective
as the EG, and become federally
enforceable as a section 111(d)/129 plan
revision upon approval by EPA. The
procedures for adoption and submittal
of State Plans and revisions are codified
in 40 CFR Part 60, subpart B.
E:\FR\FM\08APR1.SGM
08APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 8, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
II. Review of Maryland’s MWC Plan
Revision
D. Inventory of Emissions From Affected
MWC Units
The required Maryland 111(d)/129
plan revision (#07–15) was submitted to
EPA on October 24, 2007. EPA has
reviewed the plan revision for existing
LMWC units in the context of the
requirements of 40 CFR part 60, and
subparts B and Cb, as amended. State
plans must include the following
essential elements: (1) Identification of
legal authority, (2) identification of
mechanism for implementation, (3)
inventory of affected facilities, (4)
emissions inventory, (5) emissions
limits, (6) compliance schedules, (7)
testing, monitoring, recordkeeping, and
reporting, (8) public hearing records,
and (9) annual state progress reports on
facility compliance.
Title 40 CFR 60.25(a) requires that the
plan include an emissions inventory
that estimates emissions of the pollutant
regulated by the EG. Emissions from
MWC units contain organics (dioxin/
furans), metals (cadmium, lead,
mercury, particulate matter, opacity),
and acid gases (hydrogen chloride,
sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides). For
each affected MWC facility, the MDE
plan revision contains MWC unit
emissions rates for each regulated
pollutant based on 2006 and 2007 stack
test and continuous emission
monitoring data. This meets the
emission inventory requirements of 40
CFR 60.25(a).
A. Identification of Legal Authority
Title 40 CFR 60.24(c) specifies that
the State plan or revision must include
emission standards that are no less
stringent than the EG, except as
specified in 40 CFR 60.24(f) which
allows for less stringent emission
limitations on a case-by-case basis if
certain conditions are met. This
exception clause is superseded by
section 129(b)(2) of the Act which
requires that state plans be ‘‘at least as
protective’’ as the EG. A review of
COMAR 26.11.08.08 emissions
limitations shows that all are ‘‘at least
as protective’’ as those in the EG,
subpart Cb, as amended.
Title 40 CFR 60.26 requires the plan
to demonstrate that the State has legal
authority to adopt and implement the
emission standards and compliance
schedules. The initial LMWC plan
submittal demonstrates that the MDE
has the legal authority to adopt and
implement a plan.
B. Identification of Enforceable State
Mechanisms for Implementing the Plan
The subpart B provision at 40 CFR
60.24(a) requires that state plans include
emissions standards, defined in 40 CFR
60.21(f) as ‘‘* * * a legally enforceable
regulation setting forth an allowable rate
of emissions into the atmosphere, or
prescribing equipment specifications for
control of air pollution emissions.’’ The
MDE Code of Maryland Regulations
(COMAR) for LMWC units has been
amended to incorporate revisions to
subpart Cb. These amendments to
Regulations .01, .02 and .08 under
COMAR 26.11.08, Control of
Incinerators, were adopted September
12, 2007 and became effective on
October 8, 2007. Other applicable and
effective supporting air program rules
were identified in EPA’s initial plan
approval. (64 FR 19919). These rules
collectively met the requirement of 40
CFR 60.24(a) to have a legally
enforceable emission standard.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
C. Inventory of Affected MWC Units
Title 40 CFR 60.25(a) requires the
plan to include a complete source
inventory of all LMWC units. The MDE
has identified two (2) affected
facilities—Wheelabrator Baltimore, L.P.,
and Montgomery County Resource
Recovery Facility. An unknown affected
facility is not exempt from applicable
111(d)/129 requirements because it is
not listed in the source inventory.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:20 Apr 07, 2008
Jkt 214001
E. Emissions Limitations for MWC Units
F. Compliance Schedules
Under 40 CFR 60.24(c) and (e), a state
plan must include an expeditious
compliance schedule that owners and
operators of affected MWC units must
meet in order to comply with the
requirements of the plan. The plan
revision and related COMAR
26.11.08.08 rule amendments contain a
compliance schedule, consistent with
subpart Cb requirements, with specific
increments of progress for meeting the
revised and more stringent emission
limitations. § 60.24(e)(1) requires that
compliance schedules extending more
than 12 months from the date required
for submittal of the plan must include
legally enforceable increments of
progress. The required state plan
revision was due at EPA on May 10,
2007. Accordingly, the submitted plan
revision contains increments of progress
which require full facility compliance
by a date no later than April 28, 2009,
assuming an extensive emission control
system upgrade is not required. This
requirement does not preclude an
affected facility from demonstrating full
compliance prior to April 28, 2009. In
the case where an extensive emission
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18969
control system upgrade is required, the
facility’s first increment of progress is to
complete a control system and cost
analysis by April 1, 2008; if that is the
case, full compliance is then required by
March 10, 2011. The state plan revision
meets applicable Federal requirements.
G. Testing, Monitoring, Recordkeeping,
and Reporting Requirements
The provisions of subpart B, 40 CFR
60.24(b) and 60.25(b), stipulate facility
testing, monitoring recordkeeping and
reporting requirements for state plans.
COMAR 26.11.08.08 has also been
amended to be consistent with EPA’s
May 10, 2006 EG amendments, subpart
Cb, relating to source testing,
monitoring, recordkeeping and
reporting requirements.
H. A Record of Public Hearing on the
State Plan Revision
A public hearing on the plan revision
was held August 8, 2007. Applicable
portions of COMAR 26.11.08.01, .02,
and .08 amendments became effective
on October 8, 2007. The state provided
evidence of complying with public
notice and other hearing requirements,
including a record of public comments
received. The MDE has met the
requirement of 40 CFR 60.23 for a
public hearing.
I. Annual State Progress Reports to EPA
The MDE will submit to EPA on an
annual basis a report which details the
progress in the enforcement of the plan
in accordance with 40 CFR 60.25.
Accordingly, the MDE will submit
annual reports on progress in plan
enforcement to EPA on an annual
(calendar) basis, commencing with the
first full report period after plan
revision approval.
III. Final Action
Based upon the rationale discussed
above and in further detail in the
technical support document (TSD)
associated with this action, EPA is
approving the Maryland plan revision
and related COMAR 26.11.08
Regulation, Control of Incinerators,
amendments to .01, .02, and .08, as
adopted September 12, 2007. This
approval excludes certain authorities
retained by EPA, and as stated in 40
CFR 60.30b(b) and 60.50b(n). As
required by 40 CFR 60.28(c), any
revisions to the Maryland plan or
supporting regulations will not be
considered part of the applicable plan
until submitted by the MDE in
accordance with 40 CFR 60.28(a) or (b),
as applicable, and until approved by
EPA in accordance with 40 CFR part 60,
Subpart B, requirements.
E:\FR\FM\08APR1.SGM
08APR1
18970
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 8, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
EPA is publishing this rule without
prior proposal because the Agency
views this as a noncontroversial
amendment and anticipates no adverse
comments. This action simply reflects
already existing Federal requirement for
state air pollution control agencies and
existing LMWC units that are subject to
the provisions of 40 CFR part 60,
subpart Cb and related subpart Eb.
However, in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’
section of today’s Federal Register, EPA
is publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposal to approve the
section 111(d)/129 plan revision should
relevant adverse or critical comments be
filed. This rule will be effective June 9,
2008 without further notice unless EPA
receives adverse comments by May 8,
2008. If EPA receives adverse
comments, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule did
not take effect. EPA will address all
public comments in a subsequent final
rule based on the proposed rule. The
EPA will not institute a second
comment period on this action. Any
parties interested in commenting must
do so at this time.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
111(d)/129 plan submission that
complies with the provisions of the Act
and applicable Federal regulations. 42
U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus,
in reviewing 111(d)/129 plan
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:20 Apr 07, 2008
Jkt 214001
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the 111(d)/
129 plan is not approved to apply in
Indian country located in the state, and
EPA notes that it will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by June 9, 2008.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Waste treatment and disposal.
Dated: March 31, 2008.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
I
40 CFR part 62 is amended as follows:
PART 62—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 62
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart V—Maryland
2. Section 62.5110 is amended by
redesignating the existing paragraph as
paragraph (a) and adding paragraph (b)
to read as follows:
I
§ 62.5110
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
I (b) On October 24, 2007, Maryland
submitted a revised State plan (Phase II)
and related COMAR 26.11.08.01, .02,
and .08 amendments as required by 40
CFR part 60, subpart Cb, amended May
10, 2006.
I 3. Section 62.5112 is amended by
redesignating the existing paragraph as
paragraph (a) and adding paragraph (b)
to read as follows:
§ 62.5112
Effective date.
*
*
*
*
*
I (b) The plan revision (Phase II) is
effective June 9, 2008.
[FR Doc. E8–7347 Filed 4–7–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 63, 264 and 266
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2004–0022; FRL–8549–4]
RIN 2050–AG35
NESHAP: National Emission Standards
for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Standards for Hazardous Waste
Combustors; Amendments
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing amendments
to the national emission standards for
hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for
hazardous waste combustors, which
E:\FR\FM\08APR1.SGM
08APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 68 (Tuesday, April 8, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18968-18970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-7347]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA-R03-OAR-2008-MD-0209; FRL-8552-5]
Approval and Promulgation of State Air Quality Plans for
Designated Facilities and Pollutants; State of Maryland; Control of
Large Municipal Waste Combustor (LMWC) Emissions From Existing
Facilities
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve the Maryland
Department of the Environment (MDE) large municipal waste combustor
plan (the plan) revision for implementing emission guideline (EG)
amendments promulgated on May 10, 2006 by EPA under the Clean Air Act
(the Act). The plan revision establishes revised emission limits,
monitoring, and recordkeeping requirements for existing LMWC units with
a unit capacity greater than 250 tons per day (TPD). An existing LMWC
unit is one for which construction commenced on or before September 20,
1994.
DATES: This rule is effective June 9, 2008 without further notice,
unless EPA receives adverse written comment by May 8, 2008. If EPA
receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that
the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2008-0209 by one of the following methods:
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
B. E-mail: http://wilkie.walter@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA--R03 OAR-2008 MD-0209, Walter Wilkie, Chief, Air
Quality Analysis Branch, Mailcode 3AP22, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2008-MD-0209. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change, and may be made available
online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov
or e-mail. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access''
system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you
submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special
characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch
Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State submittal
are available at the Maryland Department of the Environment, 1800
Washington Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore, Maryland, 21230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James B. Topsale, P.E., at (215) 814-
2190, or by e-mail at topsale.jim@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 129(a)(5) of the Clean Air Act (the Act) requires EPA to
conduct a 5-year review of the solid waste incinerator new source
performance standards (NSPS) and emission guidelines (EG) and revise
both, as appropriate. Accordingly, in the May 10, 2006 edition of the
Federal Register, EPA promulgated revised LMWC rules under sections 111
and 129 of the Act. EG for existing affected facilities are not
federally enforceable. However, section 129(b)(2) of the Act requires
States to submit to EPA for approval State Plans and revisions that
implement and enforce the amended EG, in this case, 40 CFR part 60,
subpart Cb. State Plans and revisions must be at least as protective as
the EG, and become federally enforceable as a section 111(d)/129 plan
revision upon approval by EPA. The procedures for adoption and
submittal of State Plans and revisions are codified in 40 CFR Part 60,
subpart B.
[[Page 18969]]
II. Review of Maryland's MWC Plan Revision
The required Maryland 111(d)/129 plan revision (07-15) was
submitted to EPA on October 24, 2007. EPA has reviewed the plan
revision for existing LMWC units in the context of the requirements of
40 CFR part 60, and subparts B and Cb, as amended. State plans must
include the following essential elements: (1) Identification of legal
authority, (2) identification of mechanism for implementation, (3)
inventory of affected facilities, (4) emissions inventory, (5)
emissions limits, (6) compliance schedules, (7) testing, monitoring,
recordkeeping, and reporting, (8) public hearing records, and (9)
annual state progress reports on facility compliance.
A. Identification of Legal Authority
Title 40 CFR 60.26 requires the plan to demonstrate that the State
has legal authority to adopt and implement the emission standards and
compliance schedules. The initial LMWC plan submittal demonstrates that
the MDE has the legal authority to adopt and implement a plan.
B. Identification of Enforceable State Mechanisms for Implementing the
Plan
The subpart B provision at 40 CFR 60.24(a) requires that state
plans include emissions standards, defined in 40 CFR 60.21(f) as ``* *
* a legally enforceable regulation setting forth an allowable rate of
emissions into the atmosphere, or prescribing equipment specifications
for control of air pollution emissions.'' The MDE Code of Maryland
Regulations (COMAR) for LMWC units has been amended to incorporate
revisions to subpart Cb. These amendments to Regulations .01, .02 and
.08 under COMAR 26.11.08, Control of Incinerators, were adopted
September 12, 2007 and became effective on October 8, 2007. Other
applicable and effective supporting air program rules were identified
in EPA's initial plan approval. (64 FR 19919). These rules collectively
met the requirement of 40 CFR 60.24(a) to have a legally enforceable
emission standard.
C. Inventory of Affected MWC Units
Title 40 CFR 60.25(a) requires the plan to include a complete
source inventory of all LMWC units. The MDE has identified two (2)
affected facilities--Wheelabrator Baltimore, L.P., and Montgomery
County Resource Recovery Facility. An unknown affected facility is not
exempt from applicable 111(d)/129 requirements because it is not listed
in the source inventory.
D. Inventory of Emissions From Affected MWC Units
Title 40 CFR 60.25(a) requires that the plan include an emissions
inventory that estimates emissions of the pollutant regulated by the
EG. Emissions from MWC units contain organics (dioxin/furans), metals
(cadmium, lead, mercury, particulate matter, opacity), and acid gases
(hydrogen chloride, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides). For each
affected MWC facility, the MDE plan revision contains MWC unit
emissions rates for each regulated pollutant based on 2006 and 2007
stack test and continuous emission monitoring data. This meets the
emission inventory requirements of 40 CFR 60.25(a).
E. Emissions Limitations for MWC Units
Title 40 CFR 60.24(c) specifies that the State plan or revision
must include emission standards that are no less stringent than the EG,
except as specified in 40 CFR 60.24(f) which allows for less stringent
emission limitations on a case-by-case basis if certain conditions are
met. This exception clause is superseded by section 129(b)(2) of the
Act which requires that state plans be ``at least as protective'' as
the EG. A review of COMAR 26.11.08.08 emissions limitations shows that
all are ``at least as protective'' as those in the EG, subpart Cb, as
amended.
F. Compliance Schedules
Under 40 CFR 60.24(c) and (e), a state plan must include an
expeditious compliance schedule that owners and operators of affected
MWC units must meet in order to comply with the requirements of the
plan. The plan revision and related COMAR 26.11.08.08 rule amendments
contain a compliance schedule, consistent with subpart Cb requirements,
with specific increments of progress for meeting the revised and more
stringent emission limitations. Sec. 60.24(e)(1) requires that
compliance schedules extending more than 12 months from the date
required for submittal of the plan must include legally enforceable
increments of progress. The required state plan revision was due at EPA
on May 10, 2007. Accordingly, the submitted plan revision contains
increments of progress which require full facility compliance by a date
no later than April 28, 2009, assuming an extensive emission control
system upgrade is not required. This requirement does not preclude an
affected facility from demonstrating full compliance prior to April 28,
2009. In the case where an extensive emission control system upgrade is
required, the facility's first increment of progress is to complete a
control system and cost analysis by April 1, 2008; if that is the case,
full compliance is then required by March 10, 2011. The state plan
revision meets applicable Federal requirements.
G. Testing, Monitoring, Recordkeeping, and Reporting Requirements
The provisions of subpart B, 40 CFR 60.24(b) and 60.25(b),
stipulate facility testing, monitoring recordkeeping and reporting
requirements for state plans. COMAR 26.11.08.08 has also been amended
to be consistent with EPA's May 10, 2006 EG amendments, subpart Cb,
relating to source testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting
requirements.
H. A Record of Public Hearing on the State Plan Revision
A public hearing on the plan revision was held August 8, 2007.
Applicable portions of COMAR 26.11.08.01, .02, and .08 amendments
became effective on October 8, 2007. The state provided evidence of
complying with public notice and other hearing requirements, including
a record of public comments received. The MDE has met the requirement
of 40 CFR 60.23 for a public hearing.
I. Annual State Progress Reports to EPA
The MDE will submit to EPA on an annual basis a report which
details the progress in the enforcement of the plan in accordance with
40 CFR 60.25. Accordingly, the MDE will submit annual reports on
progress in plan enforcement to EPA on an annual (calendar) basis,
commencing with the first full report period after plan revision
approval.
III. Final Action
Based upon the rationale discussed above and in further detail in
the technical support document (TSD) associated with this action, EPA
is approving the Maryland plan revision and related COMAR 26.11.08
Regulation, Control of Incinerators, amendments to .01, .02, and .08,
as adopted September 12, 2007. This approval excludes certain
authorities retained by EPA, and as stated in 40 CFR 60.30b(b) and
60.50b(n). As required by 40 CFR 60.28(c), any revisions to the
Maryland plan or supporting regulations will not be considered part of
the applicable plan until submitted by the MDE in accordance with 40
CFR 60.28(a) or (b), as applicable, and until approved by EPA in
accordance with 40 CFR part 60, Subpart B, requirements.
[[Page 18970]]
EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no
adverse comments. This action simply reflects already existing Federal
requirement for state air pollution control agencies and existing LMWC
units that are subject to the provisions of 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cb
and related subpart Eb. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of
today's Federal Register, EPA is publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposal to approve the section 111(d)/129 plan
revision should relevant adverse or critical comments be filed. This
rule will be effective June 9, 2008 without further notice unless EPA
receives adverse comments by May 8, 2008. If EPA receives adverse
comments, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule did not take effect. EPA will
address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on
this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this
time.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
111(d)/129 plan submission that complies with the provisions of the Act
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing 111(d)/129 plan submissions, EPA's role is to
approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the
Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this
action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the 111(d)/129 plan is not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by June 9, 2008. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Waste treatment and disposal.
Dated: March 31, 2008.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
0
40 CFR part 62 is amended as follows:
PART 62--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for Part 62 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart V--Maryland
0
2. Section 62.5110 is amended by redesignating the existing paragraph
as paragraph (a) and adding paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 62.5110 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
0
(b) On October 24, 2007, Maryland submitted a revised State plan (Phase
II) and related COMAR 26.11.08.01, .02, and .08 amendments as required
by 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cb, amended May 10, 2006.
0
3. Section 62.5112 is amended by redesignating the existing paragraph
as paragraph (a) and adding paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 62.5112 Effective date.
* * * * *
0
(b) The plan revision (Phase II) is effective June 9, 2008.
[FR Doc. E8-7347 Filed 4-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P