Notice of Availability for Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Activities To Implement 2005 Base Realignment and Closure Actions at National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, 18262-18263 [E8-6891]
Download as PDF
18262
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 65 / Thursday, April 3, 2008 / Notices
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
Notice of a public committee
meeting.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery
Management Council’s (Council) Crab
Committee will meet.
The meeting will be held on
April 29, 2008, from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30
p.m.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Fina, North Pacific Fishery
Management Council; telephone: (907)
271–2809.
The
Committee will have discussions on the
following items: purpose and need
statement; potential elements and
options; crew proposal and alternatives
to those proposals; data issues;
community protections; possible
emergency relief from regionalization;
arbitration issues.
Although non-emergency issues not
contained in this agenda may come
before this group for discussion, those
issues may not be the subject of formal
action during this meeting. Action will
be restricted to those issues specifically
identified in this notice and any issues
arising after publication of this notice
that require emergency action under
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act, provided the public has been
notified of the Council’s intent to take
final action to address the emergency.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Special Accommodations
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
This meeting is physically accessible
to people with disabilities. Requests for
sign language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should be directed to Gail
Bendixen, (907) 271–2809, at least 5
working days prior to the meeting date.
Dated: March 31, 2008.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8–6881 Filed 4–2–08; 8:45 am]
17:19 Apr 02, 2008
Jkt 214001
Notice of Availability for Final
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Activities To Implement 2005 Base
Realignment and Closure Actions at
National Naval Medical Center,
Bethesda, MD
ACTION:
The meeting will be held at
the Swedish Culture Center, 1920
Dexter Avenue North, Seattle, WA
98109.
Council address: North Pacific
Fishery Management Council, 605 W.
4th Ave., Suite 306, Anchorage, AK
99501–2252.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Department of the Navy
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ADDRESSES:
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section
(102)(2)(C) of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), the regulations implemented by
the Council on Environmental Quality
(40 CFR parts 1500–1508), and the
Department of the Navy (DON) NEPA
regulation (32 CFR part 775), DON
announces the availability of the Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)
for potential environmental impacts
associated with implementing actions
directed by the Defense Base Closure
and Realignment (BRAC) Act of 1990,
Public Law 101–510, as amended in
2005 (BRAC Law), at the National Naval
Medical Center (NNMC) in Bethesda,
MD.
The Wait Period (No Action
Period) for the FEIS will end 30 days
after publication of an NOA in the
Federal Register by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency.
ADDRESSES: Officer in Charge—BRAC,
National Naval Medical Center, 8901
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20889
and Telephone: 301–319–4561.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Officer in Charge—BRAC, National
Naval Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin
Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20889 and
Telephone: 301–319–4561.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
BRAC law, the Walter Reed Army
Medical Center (WRAMC) will realign
all tertiary and complex health care
services to the NNMC campus in
Bethesda. The transfer and integration
of these services with existing functions
at NNMC will result by law in creation
of a new premier military health care
center to be named the Walter Reed
National Military Medical Center
(WRNMMC) at Bethesda, MD, and is to
be accomplished by 15 September 2011.
The BRAC-directed realignment will
bring additional patients and visitors
requiring additional staff and facilities
to be provided at NNMC. The FEIS
provides information on the proposed
new construction and facility
alterations, current estimates of the
additional staff that will be needed, and
an assessment of the potential
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
environmental impacts associated with
implementation of these realignment
actions at NNMC in Bethesda, MD.
The FEIS addresses three alternatives:
Two alternatives that implement the
BRAC-directed actions and a No Action
Alternative. Both BRAC implementation
alternatives provide the same facilities
with some facility site changes and
differences between new construction
and renovation to obtain required
facilities. The environmental impacts
between the two BRAC alternatives are
similar.
The Navy’s Preferred Alternative
would add approximately 1,144,000
square feet (SF) of new building
construction, provide approximately
508,000 SF of renovation to existing
building space at NNMC, and provide
approximately 824,000 SF of new
parking facilities. It would
accommodate approximately 2,500
additional staff and an estimated 1,862
patients and visitors each weekday.
The new construction or
improvements to existing facilities
would provide medical care and
administration additions and
alterations, a National Intrepid Center of
Excellence for traumatic brain injury
and psychological health care,
permanent and temporary lodging
facilities (Bachelor Enlisted Quarters
and Fisher HousesTM), a new physical
fitness center, additional parking, and
road and utility improvements on the
installation as needed to support the
new facilities.
The FEIS finds that the Preferred
Alternative would have minimal
impacts to soil, water, or biological
resources because the new facilities
would be constructed on either existing
development such as parking lots or on
landscaped areas with only a small
increase in impervious surfaces. No
effects to rare, threatened, and
endangered species would be expected
under the Preferred Alternative.
Emissions of air pollutants from
construction and operations of the
Preferred Alternative would not exceed
de minimis levels or ambient standards
established by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency for protection of the
airshed and thus air quality impacts
would not be significant. A short-term
increase in noise levels would occur
during construction that is typical of
construction activities. Utility
expansions would be required, but
major issues are not anticipated.
The Navy is pursuing formal Section
106 consultation under the National
Historic Preservation Act to resolve all
adverse effects to historic properties.
The Preferred Alternative will add
traffic to an area already experiencing
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 65 / Thursday, April 3, 2008 / Notices
heavy traffic congestion. The FEIS
provides a number of recommended
improvements both on and off Base to
address the effects of the traffic
generated by the Preferred Alternative.
The Navy is programming funds for
improvements at gates and on Base and
is submitting a request for Defense
Access Road Program approval for some
of these improvements off Base.
The FEIS finds all direct effects to
land use to be within NNMC and
consistent with NNMC plans; all actions
take place within the NNMC
boundaries. Off Base, the BRAC actions
increase traffic on roads already
experiencing traffic congestion.
Community planners believe that the
traffic congestion in the region could
cause land development plans to be
altered and the BRAC traffic volumes
contribute to the congestion with
heavier volumes than previously
anticipated in their plans.
Economic impacts to the surrounding
economy from the large investment in
construction and renovation of facilities
under the Preferred Alternative would
be beneficial. Personnel relocating from
WRAMC are not expected to change
their off base residences and lodging
being added for the increase in staff,
patients and visitors is considered
adequate; impacts to local housing,
schools, or community services are
expected to be minimal. Impacts to
human health and safety are not
expected.
The FEIS has been distributed to
various federal, state, and local
agencies, elected officials, special
interest groups, and interested parties.
The FEIS is also available at the
following local libraries and public
facilities: Bethesda Library, 7400
Arlington Road, Bethesda, MD, 20814;
Chevy Chase Library, 8005 Connecticut
Avenue, Chevy Chase, MD, 20815; Davis
Library, 6400 Democracy Boulevard,
Bethesda, MD, 20817; Kensington Park
Library, 4201 Knowles Avenue,
Kensington, MD, 20895; Rockville
Library, 21 Maryland Avenue,
Rockville, MD 20850; Bethesda-Chevy
Chase Regional Services Center, 4805
Edgemoor Lane, Bethesda, MD, 20814;
Bethesda Urban Partnership, Inc., 7700
Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD,
20814; and Bethesda-Chevy Chase
Chamber of Commerce, 7910 Woodmont
Avenue, Suite 1204, Bethesda, MD,
20814.
The FEIS is also available at the
following Web sites: https://
www.bethesda.med.navy.mil/
Professional/Public_Affairs/BRAC/; and
https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/
brac.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:19 Apr 02, 2008
Jkt 214001
Dated: March 28, 2008.
T.M. Cruz,
Lieutenant, Judge Advocate Generals Corps,
U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E8–6891 Filed 4–2–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Proposed Agency Information
Collection
U.S. Department of Energy.
Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy
(DOE) invites public comment on a
proposed collection of information that
DOE is developing for submission to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) pursuant to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. Comments are
invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
DATES: Comments regarding this
proposed information collection must
be received on or before June 2, 2008.
If you anticipate difficulty in submitting
comments within that period, contact
the person listed in ADDRESSES as soon
as possible.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
sent to JoAnna Sellen, Office of
International Regimes and Agreements
(NA–243), National Nuclear Security
Administration, 1000 Independence
Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20585 or by
fax at 202–586–1348, or by e-mail at
Joanna.Sellen@nnsa.doe.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to the person listed in
ADDRESSES.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
package contains: (1) OMB No. {enter
‘‘New}; (2) Information Collection
Request Title: U.S. Declaration under
the Protocol Additional to the U.S.-
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18263
IAEA Safeguards Agreement
(‘‘Additional Protocol’’), and Collection
of Information by the Department of
Energy; (3) Type of Review: New; (4)
Purpose: Develop Information for
Inclusion by the Department of Energy
in the United States Declaration to the
International Atomic Energy Agency
(IAEA) under the Additional Protocol to
the U.S.-IAEA International Safeguards
Agreement.
This proposed collection of
information is pursuant to
implementing the provisions of the
Protocol Additional to the Agreement
Between the United States of America
and the IAEA for the Application of
Safeguards in the United States of
America (the ‘‘Additional Protocol’’ or
‘‘AP’’). The Additional Protocol is a
supplement to the existing U.S.-IAEA
Safeguards Agreement, which entered
into force in 1980; once the U.S. AP
enters into force, it will become part of
the Safeguards Agreement. The United
States signed the U.S. AP in 1998,
President Bush submitted it to the
Senate on May 9, 2002 for the Senate’s
advice and consent to ratification, and
the Senate approved a resolution
providing such advice and consent on
March 31, 2004. Legislation to
implement the U.S. AP was enacted on
December 18, 2006. Entry into force of
the U.S. AP will take place when the
President deposits the instrument of
ratification with the IAEA.
The Department of Energy is the Lead
Agency for implementing the
Additional Protocol at locations owned,
operated, or leased by or for DOE,
including Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC)-licensed or certified
activities on DOE installations, and, in
coordination with the Department of
Defense, non-military locations on
installations that store or process naval
reactor fuel (collectively known as
‘‘DOE Locations’’). This collection of
information affects only those persons
performing activities at DOE Locations
that would be declarable to the IAEA
under the U.S. AP. The NRC is the Lead
Agency for locations that are subject to
the regulatory authority of the NRC,
pursuant to the NRC’s regulatory
jurisdiction under the Atomic Energy
Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2011
et seq.), with the exception of those
NRC-licensed or certified activities at
DOE Locations. The Department of
Commerce (DOC) is the Lead Agency for
all other locations in the United States,
except U. S. Government locations and
those locations for which the NRC is the
Lead Agency. All persons, including
DOE contractors performing declarable
activities at locations other than those
for which DOE is the Lead Agency,
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 65 (Thursday, April 3, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18262-18263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-6891]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Notice of Availability for Final Environmental Impact Statement
for the Activities To Implement 2005 Base Realignment and Closure
Actions at National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, MD
AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section (102)(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), the regulations implemented by the Council
on Environmental Quality (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), and the Department
of the Navy (DON) NEPA regulation (32 CFR part 775), DON announces the
availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for
potential environmental impacts associated with implementing actions
directed by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment (BRAC) Act of
1990, Public Law 101-510, as amended in 2005 (BRAC Law), at the
National Naval Medical Center (NNMC) in Bethesda, MD.
DATES: The Wait Period (No Action Period) for the FEIS will end 30 days
after publication of an NOA in the Federal Register by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency.
ADDRESSES: Officer in Charge--BRAC, National Naval Medical Center, 8901
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20889 and Telephone: 301-319-4561.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Officer in Charge--BRAC, National
Naval Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20889 and
Telephone: 301-319-4561.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the BRAC law, the Walter Reed Army
Medical Center (WRAMC) will realign all tertiary and complex health
care services to the NNMC campus in Bethesda. The transfer and
integration of these services with existing functions at NNMC will
result by law in creation of a new premier military health care center
to be named the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC)
at Bethesda, MD, and is to be accomplished by 15 September 2011.
The BRAC-directed realignment will bring additional patients and
visitors requiring additional staff and facilities to be provided at
NNMC. The FEIS provides information on the proposed new construction
and facility alterations, current estimates of the additional staff
that will be needed, and an assessment of the potential environmental
impacts associated with implementation of these realignment actions at
NNMC in Bethesda, MD.
The FEIS addresses three alternatives: Two alternatives that
implement the BRAC-directed actions and a No Action Alternative. Both
BRAC implementation alternatives provide the same facilities with some
facility site changes and differences between new construction and
renovation to obtain required facilities. The environmental impacts
between the two BRAC alternatives are similar.
The Navy's Preferred Alternative would add approximately 1,144,000
square feet (SF) of new building construction, provide approximately
508,000 SF of renovation to existing building space at NNMC, and
provide approximately 824,000 SF of new parking facilities. It would
accommodate approximately 2,500 additional staff and an estimated 1,862
patients and visitors each weekday.
The new construction or improvements to existing facilities would
provide medical care and administration additions and alterations, a
National Intrepid Center of Excellence for traumatic brain injury and
psychological health care, permanent and temporary lodging facilities
(Bachelor Enlisted Quarters and Fisher Houses\TM\), a new physical
fitness center, additional parking, and road and utility improvements
on the installation as needed to support the new facilities.
The FEIS finds that the Preferred Alternative would have minimal
impacts to soil, water, or biological resources because the new
facilities would be constructed on either existing development such as
parking lots or on landscaped areas with only a small increase in
impervious surfaces. No effects to rare, threatened, and endangered
species would be expected under the Preferred Alternative.
Emissions of air pollutants from construction and operations of the
Preferred Alternative would not exceed de minimis levels or ambient
standards established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for
protection of the airshed and thus air quality impacts would not be
significant. A short-term increase in noise levels would occur during
construction that is typical of construction activities. Utility
expansions would be required, but major issues are not anticipated.
The Navy is pursuing formal Section 106 consultation under the
National Historic Preservation Act to resolve all adverse effects to
historic properties.
The Preferred Alternative will add traffic to an area already
experiencing
[[Page 18263]]
heavy traffic congestion. The FEIS provides a number of recommended
improvements both on and off Base to address the effects of the traffic
generated by the Preferred Alternative. The Navy is programming funds
for improvements at gates and on Base and is submitting a request for
Defense Access Road Program approval for some of these improvements off
Base.
The FEIS finds all direct effects to land use to be within NNMC and
consistent with NNMC plans; all actions take place within the NNMC
boundaries. Off Base, the BRAC actions increase traffic on roads
already experiencing traffic congestion. Community planners believe
that the traffic congestion in the region could cause land development
plans to be altered and the BRAC traffic volumes contribute to the
congestion with heavier volumes than previously anticipated in their
plans.
Economic impacts to the surrounding economy from the large
investment in construction and renovation of facilities under the
Preferred Alternative would be beneficial. Personnel relocating from
WRAMC are not expected to change their off base residences and lodging
being added for the increase in staff, patients and visitors is
considered adequate; impacts to local housing, schools, or community
services are expected to be minimal. Impacts to human health and safety
are not expected.
The FEIS has been distributed to various federal, state, and local
agencies, elected officials, special interest groups, and interested
parties. The FEIS is also available at the following local libraries
and public facilities: Bethesda Library, 7400 Arlington Road, Bethesda,
MD, 20814; Chevy Chase Library, 8005 Connecticut Avenue, Chevy Chase,
MD, 20815; Davis Library, 6400 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD,
20817; Kensington Park Library, 4201 Knowles Avenue, Kensington, MD,
20895; Rockville Library, 21 Maryland Avenue, Rockville, MD 20850;
Bethesda-Chevy Chase Regional Services Center, 4805 Edgemoor Lane,
Bethesda, MD, 20814; Bethesda Urban Partnership, Inc., 7700 Old
Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD, 20814; and Bethesda-Chevy Chase Chamber
of Commerce, 7910 Woodmont Avenue, Suite 1204, Bethesda, MD, 20814.
The FEIS is also available at the following Web sites: https://
www.bethesda.med.navy.mil/Professional/Public_Affairs/BRAC/; and
https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/brac.
Dated: March 28, 2008.
T.M. Cruz,
Lieutenant, Judge Advocate Generals Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register
Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E8-6891 Filed 4-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P