Ferric Citrate; Inert Ingredient; Exemption from the Requirement of a Tolerance, 17910-17914 [E8-6818]
Download as PDF
17910
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 64 / Wednesday, April 2, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
should be banned completely. However,
under the existing framework provided
by section 408 of the FFDCA, EPA is
required to establish pesticide
tolerances or exemptions where persons
seeking such tolerances have
demonstrated that the pesticide meets
the safety standard imposed by that
statue. The commenter has not provided
the Agency with specific rationale nor
additional information pertaining to the
legal standards in FFDCA section 408
for opposing the establishment of a
tolerance for acequinocyl. In the
absence of any additional information of
a factual nature, the Agency can not
effectively respond to the commenter’s
disagreement with the Agency’s
decision.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
V. Conclusion
Therefore, the tolerances are
established for combined residues of
acequinocyl and its metabolite, 2dodecyl-3-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone
expressed as acequinocyl equivalents, in
or on grape and nut, tree, group 14 at
1.6 ppm and 0.02 ppm, respectively.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This final rule establishes a tolerance
under section 408(d) of FFDCA in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled Regulatory
Planning and Review (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this rule has
been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This final rule does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order
12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:23 Apr 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
This final rule directly regulates
growers, food processors, food handlers,
and food retailers, not States or tribes,
nor does this action alter the
relationships or distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such,
the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct
effect on States or tribal governments,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 6, 2000) do not apply
to this rule. In addition, This rule does
not impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
(Public Law 104–4).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
Dated: March 20, 2008.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
VII. Congressional Review Act
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0479; FRL–8347–9]
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report to each House of
the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of this final rule in the
Federal Register. This final rule is not
a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Ferric Citrate; Inert Ingredient;
Exemption from the Requirement of a
Tolerance
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
I
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Section 180. 599 is amended by
removing from the table in paragraph (a)
the entry for almond, and adding new
commodities to the table to read as
follows:
I
§ 180.599 Acequinocyl; Tolerances for
residues.
(a) *
*
*
Commodity
*
*
Parts per million
*
*
Grape ..............................
*
*
*
Nut, tree, group 14 .........
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
1.6
*
0.02
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–6699 Filed 4–1–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance under 40 CFR 180.910 for
residues of ferric citrate (CAS Reg. No.
2338–05–8) in or on raw agricultural
commodities when applied/used as
inert ingredients in pesticide
formulations. The Shepherd Chemical
Company submitted a petition to EPA
under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as amended by
the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996,
requesting an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance. This
regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level
for residues of ferric citrate.
DATES: This regulation is effective April
2, 2008. Objections and requests for
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 64 / Wednesday, April 2, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
hearings must be received on or before
June 2, 2008, and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2006–0479. To access the
electronic docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, select ‘‘Advanced
Search,’’ then ‘‘Docket Search.’’ Insert
the docket ID number where indicated
and select the ‘‘Submit’’ button. Follow
the instructions on the regulations.gov
website to view the docket index or
access available documents. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the docket index available in
regulations.gov. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either in the electronic docket
at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the Office of
Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory
Public Docket in Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of
operation of this Docket Facility are
from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket Facility telephone
number is (703) 305–5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathleen Martin, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 308–2857; e-mail address:
martin.kathleen@epa.gov.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:23 Apr 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. To determine whether
you or your business may be affected by
this action, you should carefully
examine the applicability provisions in
40 CFR part 152. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies
of this Document?
In addition to accessing an electronic
copy of this Federal Register document
through the electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, you may access
this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the Federal Register listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may
also access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Printing
Office’s pilot e-CFR site at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing
Request?
Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, as
amended by FQPA, any person may file
an objection to any aspect of this
regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. The EPA
procedural regulations which govern the
submission of objections and requests
for hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178.
You must file your objection or request
a hearing on this regulation in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2006–0479 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
requests must be in writing, and must be
mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk
on or before June 2, 2008.
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing that does not
contain any CBI for inclusion in the
public docket that is described in
ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2
may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit your
copies, identified by docket ID number
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17911
EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0479, by one of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is
(703) 305–5805.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of June 7, 2006
(71 FR 32955) (FRL–8071–2), EPA
issued a notice pursuant to section
408(d)(3) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide tolerance petition (PP 6E7062)
by The Shepherd Chemical Company,
4900 Beech Street; Norwood, OH
45212–2398. The petition requested that
40 CFR part 180 be amended by
establishing an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance for residues
of ferric citrate. No comments were
received in response to the notice of
filing.
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish an exemption
from the requirement for a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Pursuant to
section 408(c)(2)(B) of FFDCA, in
establishing or maintaining in effect an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance, EPA must take into account
the factors set forth in section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA, which requires
EPA to give special consideration to
exposure of infants and children to the
pesticide chemical residue in
establishing a tolerance and to ‘‘ensure
that there is a reasonable certainty that
no harm will result to infants and
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
17912
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 64 / Wednesday, April 2, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
children from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue.’’
EPA performs a number of analyses to
determine the risks from aggregate
exposure to pesticide residues. First,
EPA determines the toxicity of
pesticides. Second, EPA examines
exposure to the pesticide through food,
drinking water, and through other
exposures that occur as a result of
pesticide use in residential settings.
Provided below in Unit III is a brief
summary and conclusions for the
Agency’s review of ferric citrate. The
full Inert Ingredient Decision Document
for this action is available on EPA’s
Electronic Docket at https://
www.regulations.gov/ under docket
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0479.
III. Toxicological Profile
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D)
of FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other
relevant information in support of this
action and considered its validity,
completeness and reliability and the
relationship of this information to
human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the
variability of the sensitivities of major
identifiable subgroups of consumers,
including infants and children. The
nature of the toxic effects caused by
ferric citrate is discussed in this unit.
The Agency reviewed the available
information on ferric citrate and
determined that the toxicity database is
sufficient. The toxicity studies
summarized below are from the
published literature; their full references
are provided in the Decision Document.
In summary, from what is known about
the sulfates of iron (as opposed to the
citrate), it appears that ferric citrate is
not acutely toxic via the oral route. In
subchronic toxicity using mice, no
effects were noted at the maximum
tolerated dose. In chronic toxicity
testing, no effects were seen at 1,200
parts per million (ppm). Ferric citrate
has not been shown to be mutagenic or
carcinogenic. Finally, no developmental
and reproductive effects have been
shown.
Acute toxicity. No acute toxicity
studies per se were identified for ferric
citrate. In 2002 the Agency reassessed
the tolerance exemptions for the mineral
acids and their salts. Among the
chemicals assessed were the iron
sulfates. Acute toxicity values included:
oral LD50 rat—1,487 to 2,102
milligrams/kilograms (mg/kg); oral LD50
mice—1,520 mg/kg; and dermal LD50
rabbit—2,000 mg/kg. The National
Academy of Sciences Institute of
Medicine (IOM) discusses reports of
acute toxicity resulting from overdoses
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:23 Apr 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
of medicinal iron, especially in young
children. Accidental iron overdose is
the most common cause of poisoning
deaths in children under six years of age
in the U.S. The severity of iron toxicity
is related to the amount of elemental
iron absorbed. Gastrointestinal (GI)
manifestations occur following the
ingestion of 20 milligrams/kilograms
body weight (mg/kg bw) and systemic
toxicity may occur following the
ingestion of 60 mg/kg bw. Vomiting and
diarrhea characterize the initial stages of
iron intoxication while later systemic
effects can include those involving the
heart, central nervous system, kidney,
liver, and blood. IOM reports that in
studies with adults, GI effects were seen
at 50 milligrams/day (mg/day) of
elemental iron; this finding is supported
by other studies showing similar effects.
Subchronic toxicity. The open
literature reports a study where ferric
citrate was administered to mice in
drinking water at doses of 0; 0.06; 0.12;
0.25; 0.5; or 1% (which is equivalent to
0; 600; 1,200; 2,500; 5,000; or 10,000
ppm) for 13 weeks. The investigators
determined that the maximum tolerated
dose is 1,200 ppm.
Mutagenicity. The open literature
provides results of Ames testing (with S.
typhimurium strains TA92, TA 1535,
TA100, TA1537, TA94, and TA98) and
chromosomal aberration testing (with
Chinese hamster fibroblasts). In the
Ames test using 25 milligrams/plate
(mg/plate) of ferric citrate (the
maximum dose), no significant
increases in the number of revertant
colonies were detected in any S.
typhimurium strains. In the
chromosomal aberration testing using
0.5 milligrams/milliLiters (mg/mL) (the
maximum dose), polyploidy was
observed in 3% of the cells after 48
hours and structural aberration was
observed in 1% of the cells after 48
hours; the investigators concluded that
these results were negative for
chromosomal aberration.
Chronic toxicity. In a study reported
in the open literature, ferric citrate was
administered to mice in drinking water
at doses of 0; 0.06; or 0.12% (which is
equivalent to 0; 600 or 1,200 ppm) for
96 weeks. No evidence of chronic
toxicity or carcinogenicity was
demonstrated in the study.
Developmental and reproductive
toxicity. To determine if toxic fetal
serum iron levels are reached when
maternal serum iron concentrations rise
above what the body can
homeostatically maintain, investigators
dosed pregnant sheep with toxic doses
of iron. Specifically, four gravid ewes
were dosed with ferric chloride at 2 mg/
kg/bw via intravenous administration
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
over 60 minutes; this route was chosen
over the oral route because only a small
amount of iron is absorbed from the
gastrointestinal tract after overdose. A
significant rise was observed in the
maternal serum iron concentration but
not in that of the fetuses. The
investigators concluded that the fetus is
protected from elevated maternal serum
iron concentrations during the third
trimester of pregnancy, a period when
the fetus acquires most of the iron that
it needs during the gestational period.
IV. Aggregate Exposures
In examining aggregate exposure,
FFDCA section 408 directs EPA to
consider available information
concerning exposures from the pesticide
residue in food and all other nonoccupational exposures, including
drinking water from ground water or
surface water and exposure through
pesticide use in gardens, lawns, or
buildings (residential and other indoor
uses).
EPA does not have information
available to assess the potential for
exposure to ferric citrate in consumer
products. Nevertheless, given: The
natural and ubiquitous occurrence of
iron-containing compounds in the
environment; iron’s known role in
human physiology; and its presence in
various foods such as beef, soybeans,
lentils, and spinach, it is unlikely that
residential exposures of concern would
result from the use of ferric citrate in
nonpesticide products and as an
ingredient in pesticide. Therefore, no
further aggregate assessment is
necessary.
Dietary Exposure Food. EPA
estimated dietary exposures for use of
ferric citrate as an inert ingredient using
DEEM(tm), or Dietary Exposure
Evaluation Model, a generic screening
model that assumes that the inert
ingredient is used on all commodities
and that 100 percent of crops are treated
with the inert ingredient. Generic
chronic exposure for the overall U.S.
population was estimated at 0.12 mg/kg/
day.
2. Drinking water exposure. Iron
concentrations in groundwater have
been reported to range <0.5 to 100 mg/
L; higher values have been found in the
absence of oxygen and in the presences
of organic matter. In surface waters, iron
concentrations can vary widely, ranging
from 61 to 2,680 milligrams/Liters (mg/
L).
V. Cumulative Effects
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA
requires that, when considering whether
to establish, modify, or revoke a
tolerance, the Agency consider
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 64 / Wednesday, April 2, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
VI. Determination of Safety for U.S.
Population, Infants and Children
Based on the information in this
preamble, EPA concludes that there is a
reasonable certainty of no harm from
aggregate exposure to residues.
Accordingly, EPA finds that exempting
from the requirement of a tolerance will
be safe.
VII. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Method
An analytical method is not required
for enforcement purposes since the
Agency is establishing an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance
without any numerical limitation.
B. International Tolerances
The Agency is not aware of any
country requiring a tolerance for ferric
citrate (CAS Reg. No. 2338–05–8), nor
have any CODEX Maximum Residue
Levels (MRLs) been established for any
food crops at this time.
VIII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This final rule establishes a tolerance
under section 408(d) of FFDCA in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled Regulatory
Planning and Review (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this final rule
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this final rule is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This final rule does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order
12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates
growers, food processors, food handlers,
and food retailers, not States or tribes,
nor does this action alter the
relationships or distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such,
the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct
effect on States or tribal governments,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 6, 2000) do not apply
to this final rule. In addition, this final
rule does not impose any enforceable
duty or contain any unfunded mandate
as described under Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (Public Law 104–4).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
Limits
‘‘available information’’ concerning the
cumulative effects of a particular
pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other
substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity.’’
Unlike other pesticides for which EPA
has followed a cumulative risk approach
based on a common mechanism of
toxicity, EPA has not made a common
mechanism of toxicity finding as to
ferric citrate and any other substances
and, this material does not appear to
produce a toxic metabolite produced by
other substances. For the purposes of
this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has
not assumed that ferric citrate has a
common mechanism of toxicity with
other substances. For information
regarding EPA’s efforts to determine
which chemicals have a common
mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate
the cumulative effects of such
chemicals, see the policy statements
released by EPA’s Office of Pesticide
Programs concerning common
mechanism determinations and
procedures for cumulating effects from
substances found to have a common
mechanism on EPA’s website at https://
www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative/.
Uses
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Inert ingredients
*
Ferric Citrate (CAS Reg. No. 2338–05–8)
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:23 Apr 01, 2008
17913
Jkt 214001
*
*
*
*
*
.........................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
IX. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report to each House of
the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of this final rule in the
Federal Register. This final rule is not
a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: March 21, 2008.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
I
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In §180.910 the table is amended
by adding alphabetically the following
inert ingredient to read as follows:
I
§ 180.910 Inert ingredients used pre- and
post-harvest; exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance.
*
*
*
*
Stabilizer
*
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
*
*
17914
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 64 / Wednesday, April 2, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
[FR Doc. E8–6818 Filed 4–1–08; 8:45 am]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
40 CFR Part 180
Susan Stanton, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 305–5218; e-mail address:
stanton.susan@epa.gov.
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2007–0325; FRL–8356–6]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dicamba; Pesticide Tolerance
I. General Information
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes
tolerances for combined residues of
dicamba and its 5-hydroxy metabolite in
or on corn, sweet, forage; corn, sweet,
kernel plus cob with husks removed;
and corn, sweet, stover. Interregional
Research Project Number 4 (IR-4)
requested these tolerances under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective April
2, 2008. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
June 2, 2008, and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION ).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2007–0325. To access the
electronic docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, select ‘‘Advanced
Search,’’ then ‘‘Docket Search.’’ Insert
the docket ID number where indicated
and select the ‘‘Submit’’ button. Follow
the instructions on the regulations.gov
website to view the docket index or
access available documents. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the docket index available in
regulations.gov. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S–
4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is (703) 305–
5805.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:23 Apr 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to those engaged in the
following activities:
• Crop production (NAICS code
111), e.g., agricultural workers;
greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture
workers; farmers.
• Animal production (NAICS code
112), e.g., cattle ranchers and farmers,
dairy cattle farmers, livestock farmers.
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311), e.g., agricultural workers; farmers;
greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture
workers; ranchers; pesticide applicators.
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532), e.g., agricultural workers;
commercial applicators; farmers;
greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture
workers; residential users.
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather to provide a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies
of this Document?
In addition to accessing an electronic
copy of this Federal Register document
through the electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, you may access
this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may
also access a frequently updated
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
the Government Printing Office’s pilot
e-CFR site at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/
ecfr.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing
Request?
Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, any
person may file an objection to any
aspect of this regulation and may also
request a hearing on those objections.
You must file your objection or request
a hearing on this regulation in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2007–0325 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
requests must be in writing, and must be
mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk
as required by 40 CFR part 178 on or
before June 2, 2008.
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing that does not
contain any CBI for inclusion in the
public docket that is described in
ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2
may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit this copy,
identified by docket ID number EPA–
HQ–OPP–2007–0325, by one of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is
(703) 305–5805.
II. Petition for Tolerance
In the Federal Register of May 9, 2007
(72 FR 26375) (FRL–8128–1), EPA
issued a notice pursuant to section
408(d)(3) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide petition ((PP) 0E6209) by
Interregional Research Project Number 4
(IR-4), 500 College Road East, Suite 201
W, Princeton, NJ 08540–6635. The
petition requested that 40 CFR 180.227
be amended by establishing tolerances
for combined residues of the herbicide
dicamba, 3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid, and
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 64 (Wednesday, April 2, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17910-17914]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-6818]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0479; FRL-8347-9]
Ferric Citrate; Inert Ingredient; Exemption from the Requirement
of a Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance under 40 CFR 180.910 for residues of ferric citrate (CAS
Reg. No. 2338-05-8) in or on raw agricultural commodities when applied/
used as inert ingredients in pesticide formulations. The Shepherd
Chemical Company submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as amended by the Food Quality
Protection Act of 1996, requesting an exemption from the requirement of
a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to establish a maximum
permissible level for residues of ferric citrate.
DATES: This regulation is effective April 2, 2008. Objections and
requests for
[[Page 17911]]
hearings must be received on or before June 2, 2008, and must be filed
in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see
also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0479. To access the
electronic docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, select ``Advanced
Search,'' then ``Docket Search.'' Insert the docket ID number where
indicated and select the ``Submit'' button. Follow the instructions on
the regulations.gov website to view the docket index or access
available documents. All documents in the docket are listed in the
docket index available in regulations.gov. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either in the electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard copy, at the Office
of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
hours of operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Martin, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number: (703) 308-2857; e-mail address: martin.kathleen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. To determine
whether you or your business may be affected by this action, you should
carefully examine the applicability provisions in 40 CFR part 152. If
you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document?
In addition to accessing an electronic copy of this Federal
Register document through the electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, you may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the Federal Register
listings at https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may also access a
frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the
Government Printing Office's pilot e-CFR site at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing Request?
Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, as amended by FQPA, any person may
file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request
a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural regulations which
govern the submission of objections and requests for hearings appear in
40 CFR part 178. You must file your objection or request a hearing on
this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0479 in the subject line on the first page of
your submission. All requests must be in writing, and must be mailed or
delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or before June 2, 2008.
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public
docket that is described in ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit your copies, identified by docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0479, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of June 7, 2006 (71 FR 32955) (FRL-8071-2),
EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408(d)(3) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance petition (PP
6E7062) by The Shepherd Chemical Company, 4900 Beech Street; Norwood,
OH 45212-2398. The petition requested that 40 CFR part 180 be amended
by establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for
residues of ferric citrate. No comments were received in response to
the notice of filing.
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue,
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through
drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Pursuant to section 408(c)(2)(B) of FFDCA, in
establishing or maintaining in effect an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance, EPA must take into account the factors set forth in
section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA, which requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
[[Page 17912]]
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue.''
EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. First, EPA determines the
toxicity of pesticides. Second, EPA examines exposure to the pesticide
through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as
a result of pesticide use in residential settings. Provided below in
Unit III is a brief summary and conclusions for the Agency's review of
ferric citrate. The full Inert Ingredient Decision Document for this
action is available on EPA's Electronic Docket at https://
www.regulations.gov/ under docket number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0479.
III. Toxicological Profile
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other relevant information in support of
this action and considered its validity, completeness and reliability
and the relationship of this information to human risk. EPA has also
considered available information concerning the variability of the
sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including
infants and children. The nature of the toxic effects caused by ferric
citrate is discussed in this unit.
The Agency reviewed the available information on ferric citrate and
determined that the toxicity database is sufficient. The toxicity
studies summarized below are from the published literature; their full
references are provided in the Decision Document. In summary, from what
is known about the sulfates of iron (as opposed to the citrate), it
appears that ferric citrate is not acutely toxic via the oral route. In
subchronic toxicity using mice, no effects were noted at the maximum
tolerated dose. In chronic toxicity testing, no effects were seen at
1,200 parts per million (ppm). Ferric citrate has not been shown to be
mutagenic or carcinogenic. Finally, no developmental and reproductive
effects have been shown.
Acute toxicity. No acute toxicity studies per se were identified
for ferric citrate. In 2002 the Agency reassessed the tolerance
exemptions for the mineral acids and their salts. Among the chemicals
assessed were the iron sulfates. Acute toxicity values included: oral
LD50 rat--1,487 to 2,102 milligrams/kilograms (mg/kg); oral
LD50 mice--1,520 mg/kg; and dermal LD50 rabbit--
2,000 mg/kg. The National Academy of Sciences Institute of Medicine
(IOM) discusses reports of acute toxicity resulting from overdoses of
medicinal iron, especially in young children. Accidental iron overdose
is the most common cause of poisoning deaths in children under six
years of age in the U.S. The severity of iron toxicity is related to
the amount of elemental iron absorbed. Gastrointestinal (GI)
manifestations occur following the ingestion of 20 milligrams/kilograms
body weight (mg/kg bw) and systemic toxicity may occur following the
ingestion of 60 mg/kg bw. Vomiting and diarrhea characterize the
initial stages of iron intoxication while later systemic effects can
include those involving the heart, central nervous system, kidney,
liver, and blood. IOM reports that in studies with adults, GI effects
were seen at 50 milligrams/day (mg/day) of elemental iron; this finding
is supported by other studies showing similar effects.
Subchronic toxicity. The open literature reports a study where
ferric citrate was administered to mice in drinking water at doses of
0; 0.06; 0.12; 0.25; 0.5; or 1% (which is equivalent to 0; 600; 1,200;
2,500; 5,000; or 10,000 ppm) for 13 weeks. The investigators determined
that the maximum tolerated dose is 1,200 ppm.
Mutagenicity. The open literature provides results of Ames testing
(with S. typhimurium strains TA92, TA 1535, TA100, TA1537, TA94, and
TA98) and chromosomal aberration testing (with Chinese hamster
fibroblasts). In the Ames test using 25 milligrams/plate (mg/plate) of
ferric citrate (the maximum dose), no significant increases in the
number of revertant colonies were detected in any S. typhimurium
strains. In the chromosomal aberration testing using 0.5 milligrams/
milliLiters (mg/mL) (the maximum dose), polyploidy was observed in 3%
of the cells after 48 hours and structural aberration was observed in
1% of the cells after 48 hours; the investigators concluded that these
results were negative for chromosomal aberration.
Chronic toxicity. In a study reported in the open literature,
ferric citrate was administered to mice in drinking water at doses of
0; 0.06; or 0.12% (which is equivalent to 0; 600 or 1,200 ppm) for 96
weeks. No evidence of chronic toxicity or carcinogenicity was
demonstrated in the study.
Developmental and reproductive toxicity. To determine if toxic
fetal serum iron levels are reached when maternal serum iron
concentrations rise above what the body can homeostatically maintain,
investigators dosed pregnant sheep with toxic doses of iron.
Specifically, four gravid ewes were dosed with ferric chloride at 2 mg/
kg/bw via intravenous administration over 60 minutes; this route was
chosen over the oral route because only a small amount of iron is
absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract after overdose. A significant
rise was observed in the maternal serum iron concentration but not in
that of the fetuses. The investigators concluded that the fetus is
protected from elevated maternal serum iron concentrations during the
third trimester of pregnancy, a period when the fetus acquires most of
the iron that it needs during the gestational period.
IV. Aggregate Exposures
In examining aggregate exposure, FFDCA section 408 directs EPA to
consider available information concerning exposures from the pesticide
residue in food and all other non-occupational exposures, including
drinking water from ground water or surface water and exposure through
pesticide use in gardens, lawns, or buildings (residential and other
indoor uses).
EPA does not have information available to assess the potential for
exposure to ferric citrate in consumer products. Nevertheless, given:
The natural and ubiquitous occurrence of iron-containing compounds in
the environment; iron's known role in human physiology; and its
presence in various foods such as beef, soybeans, lentils, and spinach,
it is unlikely that residential exposures of concern would result from
the use of ferric citrate in nonpesticide products and as an ingredient
in pesticide. Therefore, no further aggregate assessment is necessary.
Dietary Exposure Food. EPA estimated dietary exposures for use of
ferric citrate as an inert ingredient using DEEM\(tm)\, or Dietary
Exposure Evaluation Model, a generic screening model that assumes that
the inert ingredient is used on all commodities and that 100 percent of
crops are treated with the inert ingredient. Generic chronic exposure
for the overall U.S. population was estimated at 0.12 mg/kg/day.
2. Drinking water exposure. Iron concentrations in groundwater have
been reported to range <0.5 to 100 mg/L; higher values have been found
in the absence of oxygen and in the presences of organic matter. In
surface waters, iron concentrations can vary widely, ranging from 61 to
2,680 milligrams/Liters (mg/L).
V. Cumulative Effects
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when considering
whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency
consider
[[Page 17913]]
``available information'' concerning the cumulative effects of a
particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances that have a
common mechanism of toxicity.''
Unlike other pesticides for which EPA has followed a cumulative
risk approach based on a common mechanism of toxicity, EPA has not made
a common mechanism of toxicity finding as to ferric citrate and any
other substances and, this material does not appear to produce a toxic
metabolite produced by other substances. For the purposes of this
tolerance action, therefore, EPA has not assumed that ferric citrate
has a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances. For
information regarding EPA's efforts to determine which chemicals have a
common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of
such chemicals, see the policy statements released by EPA's Office of
Pesticide Programs concerning common mechanism determinations and
procedures for cumulating effects from substances found to have a
common mechanism on EPA's website at https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/
cumulative/.
VI. Determination of Safety for U.S. Population, Infants and Children
Based on the information in this preamble, EPA concludes that there
is a reasonable certainty of no harm from aggregate exposure to
residues. Accordingly, EPA finds that exempting from the requirement of
a tolerance will be safe.
VII. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Method
An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since
the Agency is establishing an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance without any numerical limitation.
B. International Tolerances
The Agency is not aware of any country requiring a tolerance for
ferric citrate (CAS Reg. No. 2338-05-8), nor have any CODEX Maximum
Residue Levels (MRLs) been established for any food crops at this time.
VIII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This final rule establishes a tolerance under section 408(d) of
FFDCA in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this final rule has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this final rule is
not subject to Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997). This final rule does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as the tolerance in
this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 6, 2000) do not apply to this final rule. In addition,
this final rule does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 104-4).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272
note).
IX. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to
the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the
United States prior to publication of this final rule in the Federal
Register. This final rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: March 21, 2008.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
0
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.910 the table is amended by adding alphabetically the
following inert ingredient to read as follows:
Sec. 180.910 Inert ingredients used pre- and post-harvest; exemptions
from the requirement of a tolerance.
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inert ingredients Limits Uses
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Ferric Citrate (CAS Reg. No. .................. Stabilizer
2338-05-8)
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 17914]]
[FR Doc. E8-6818 Filed 4-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S