Third-Party Certification Programs for Foods and Feeds; Request for Comments, 17989-17991 [E8-6705]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 64 / Wednesday, April 2, 2008 / Notices
delayed, limited, or denied. What would
be the principal benefits and limitations
of these proposals? In implementing
these proposals how could the benefits
be best leveraged and the limitations
mitigated?
Core Element #3: Response
3.1 What are the best practices, and
what are the principal benefits and
challenges to implementing the key
response steps in the Plan? How do
these vary by stakeholder (e.g.,
producers, manufacturers, retailers,
consumers, Federal/State government,
and foreign countries)?
3.2 What, if any, significant gaps are
there in the key response steps and the
associated FDA actions listed in the
plan?
3.3 The Plan proposes two new
legislative authorities to strengthen
FDA’s response capability: (1)
Empowering FDA to issue a mandatory
recall of food products when voluntary
recalls are not effective, and (2)
providing FDA enhanced access to food
records during emergencies. What
would be the principal benefits and
limitations of each of these proposed
authorities? In implementing these
proposed authorities, how could the
benefits be best leveraged and the
limitations mitigated?
II. Comments
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic
comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic
comments or two paper copies of any
mailed comments, except that
individuals may submit one paper copy.
Comments are to be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Please note that on January 15, 2008,
the FDA Division of Dockets
Management Web site transitioned to
the Federal Dockets Management
System (FDMS). FDMS is a
Government-wide, electronic docket
management system. Electronic
comments or submissions will be
accepted by FDA through FDMS only.
Dated: March 26, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E8–6833 Filed 4–1–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:36 Apr 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2008–N–0183]
Third-Party Certification Programs for
Foods and Feeds; Request for
Comments
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice; request for comments.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is requesting
comments on the use of third-party
certification programs for foods and
feeds, including pet foods. An
increasing number of firms that sell
foods to the public, such as retailers and
food service providers, are requesting
that their suppliers become certified as
meeting food (and feed) safety and
quality standards as a condition of
doing business. FDA seeks more
information on the existence and use of
these types of programs to better
understand how they can help to ensure
that food products are safe, secure, and
meet FDA requirements.
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments by May 19, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
to the Division of Dockets Management
(HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sharon Lindan Mayl, Office of Policy
(HF–11), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–827–3360.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Ensuring the safety of food for human
and animal use is a shared
responsibility between the public and
private sectors. FDA has the authority to
establish regulatory standards, inspect
facilities, and take action if there are
violations, but it is ultimately the
responsibility of industry to ensure that
food and feed intended for consumption
in the United States meet applicable
FDA standards. An increasing number
of firms that sell foods and feeds
(hereinafter foods) to the public, such as
retailers and food service providers, are
requesting that their suppliers, both
foreign and domestic, become certified
as meeting food safety and quality
standards as a condition of doing
business. In addition, domestic and
foreign suppliers (such as producers, co-
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17989
manufacturers, or re-packers) are
increasingly looking to third parties to
assist them in meeting U.S.
requirements. FDA is seeking comment
on current practices of third-party
certification programs that work with
food products and to ensure the supply
chain is safe, secure, and meet FDA
requirements.
A. Current Use of Voluntary Third-Party
Certification Programs for Foods
A growing number of food firms
require their suppliers to ensure their
products are produced using ‘‘best
practices’’ for food safety, quality, and
security and that the supply chain is
safe and secure. These firms often
require their suppliers to meet
nationally or globally recognized food
safety standards and to verify that these
standards are met through a third-party
certification program. For example, the
Global Food Safety Initiative requires
food suppliers to have a factory audit
certification against internationally
recognized standards, which include the
Safe Quality Food, British Retail
Consortium, International Food
Standard, and GlobalGAP. The Global
Aquaculture Alliance has also
established standards for aquaculture
production and processing and created
an accrediting body for certifiers from
30 countries. These types of private
sector developed programs are being
used in many foreign countries, as well
as the United States.
B. Interagency Working Group on
Import Safety
On July 18, 2007, the President issued
Executive Order 13439 to establish the
Interagency Working Group on Import
Safety (Working Group). On November
6, 2007, the Working Group released an
‘‘Action Plan for Import Safety: A
Roadmap for Continual Improvement’’
(Action Plan) (https://
www.importsafety.gov/report/
actionplan.pdf). The Action Plan
contains 14 broad recommendations and
50 specific short- and long-term action
steps to better protect consumers and
enhance the safety of the increasing
volume of imports entering the United
States. The Action Plan stresses the
importance of the private sector’s
responsibility for the safety of its
products and the importance of ongoing
private-sector mechanisms and
experience as a basis for ongoing,
substantive public-private collaboration.
The public and private sectors have a
shared interest in import safety, and
substantive improvement will require
the careful collaboration of the entire
importing community.
E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM
02APN1
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
17990
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 64 / Wednesday, April 2, 2008 / Notices
Recommendation 2 of the Action Plan
is to ‘‘verify compliance of foreign
producers with United States safety and
security standards through
certification.’’ Third-party certification
can augment the Federal Government’s
and the importing community’s ability
to ensure that products imported into
the United States meet U.S. safety and
security standards. The Action Plan
states ‘‘[f]or foreign producers, the
ability to participate in voluntary
certification programs could allow
products from firms that comply with
U.S. safety and security standards to
enter the United States more quickly.
This would facilitate trade, while
allowing federal departments and
agencies to focus their resources on
products from non-certified firms or for
which information suggests there may
be safety or security concerns. This
would allow federal departments and
agencies to more effectively target their
resources. It may not be necessary to
establish certification programs for lowrisk products.’’
Action Steps 2.2 and 2.4 of the Action
Plan call for the development of
voluntary third-party certification
programs based on risk for foreign
producers of certain products who
export to the United States and the
creation of incentives for foreign firms
to participate in voluntary certification
programs and for importers to purchase
only from certified firms.
In conjunction with the Action Plan,
on November 6, 2007, FDA released its
Food Protection Plan (FPP), a
comprehensive initiative designed to
bolster efforts to better protect the
Nation’s food supply (https://
www.fda.gov/oc/initiatives/advance/
food/plan.html).
Although certification by an
independent third party would not
replace an FDA inspection, and FDA
would continue to inspect a firm itself,
as appropriate based on risk, third-party
certification could provide additional
assurances of safety. In addition, thirdparty certification could provide FDA
with important information about the
ability of specific food suppliers to meet
FDA requirements and to better focus
the use of our resources based on risk.
FDA believes that eligible third parties
should include other Federal
government, State government, and
foreign government agencies and
officials.
If FDA were to develop or recognize
(or accredit) one or more independent
third-party certification programs, we
would provide an opportunity for both
foreign and domestic firms to
voluntarily participate. However, FDA
would need sufficient confidence in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:36 Apr 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
quality of the audits performed and the
validity of the decisions to certify by the
third parties as well as the
independence of the third parties from
the firms they certify before we would
consider recognizing a third-party
certification program.
One action FDA will take to
implement the Action Plan and the FPP
is to accredit independent third parties,
or to recognize entities that accredit, to
evaluate compliance with FDA
requirements. This notice represents
FDA’s first step in soliciting public
input in the design and development or
recognition of third-party certification
programs.
II. Request for Information
FDA is seeking information on the use
of third-party certification programs. In
addition to general information, we are
posing several specific questions related
to these types of programs.
1. What domestic and foreign thirdparty certification programs for
suppliers are currently in use by U.S.
companies?
FDA is aware of several third-party
certification programs that are currently
being used in the United States. We
would like more information regarding
these and other certification programs,
the standards on which they are based,
and who is currently using these thirdparty programs. In addition, we would
like information on the standards and
procedures used to ensure that the third
parties used are independent (i.e.,
without conflicts of interest), the
standards used to accredit third parties,
who accredits these third parties, and
how and by whom these third parties
are audited and evaluated for
performance. We would also like to
know how national government bodies
interface with or recognize these
certification programs.
2. Do the current third-party
certification programs ensure
compliance with FDA requirements?
Third-party certification programs for
foods are used widely in Europe. These
types of certification programs are
becoming more popular in other parts of
the world, including the United States.
FDA solicits comment on whether the
requirements for certification used by
these programs encompass FDA
requirements. If not, what modifications
need to be made for the U.S.
marketplace? Should FDA recognize (or
accredit) any of these programs? Should
FDA participate in future modifications
to any of these programs? If so, in what
capacity?
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3. What are the obstacles to private
sector participation in these third-party
certification programs?
Although the use of third-party
certification programs is growing, they
are not used by the majority of U.S. food
firms. FDA seeks information about any
barriers that may exist to using thirdparty certification programs. Are
retailers and suppliers aware of these
programs? Are these programs widely
available? Are they cost effective? Are
there particular obstacles for small
businesses?
4. What incentives would increase
participation in these third-party
certification programs?
FDA recognizes that there are
business and legal incentives to using
third-party certification programs. We
would like to know what incentives
could increase participation in these
certification programs. For example,
would expedited treatment at U.S. ports
of entry significantly encourage foreign
suppliers to participate or domestic
firms to make participation by foreign or
domestic suppliers a condition of doing
business with them? Would making the
names of certified firms publicly
available, such as through a publicly
accessible database, significantly
encourage participation in these
programs by foreign or domestic
suppliers? Would FDA considering
certification as one factor in
determining inspection priorities
provide a significant incentive for
foreign or domestic firms to participate?
Are there other incentives that would
increase participation for imported
foods? For domestic foods?
III. How to Submit Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic
comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic
comments to https://www.regulations.gov
or two paper copies of any mailed
comments, except that individuals may
submit one paper copy. Comments are
to be identified with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this
document. Received comments may be
seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Please note that on January 15, 2008,
the FDA Division of Dockets
Management Web site transitioned to
the Federal Dockets Management
System (FDMS). FDMS is a
Government-wide, electronic docket
management system. Electronic
E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM
02APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 64 / Wednesday, April 2, 2008 / Notices
comments or submissions will be
accepted by FDA through FDMS only.
Dated: March 27, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E8–6705 Filed 4–1–08; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institute of Mental Health;
Notice of Workgroup Meeting
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services
Administration
National Advisory Council on Migrant
Health; Notice of Meeting
Health Resources and Services
Administration, HHS.
Action: In accordance with section
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463), notice
is hereby given of the following
meeting:
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given of a meeting of
the Strategic Plan Workgroup (SPWG)
organized by the Interagency Autism
Coordinating Committee (IACC).
Audio of this workgroup meeting will
be accessible to the public via a
teleconference phone link, and there
will be web-based access to information
displayed at the meeting via computer/
projector. Access information will be
posted on the IACC Web site: (https://
www.nimh.nih.gov/research-funding/
scientific-meetings/recurring-meetings/
iacc/events/index.shtml); to request
reasonable accommodation, contact
Tanya Pryor at pryort@mail.nih.gov. Due
to the space limitation of the Conference
Room, attendance at the meeting itself
will be limited to SPWG and IACC
members. The purpose of this meeting
is to discuss current funding for Autism
Spectrum Disorder (ASD) research, as
well as organize and tentatively
prioritize proposed research initiatives
that will be used to develop the IACC
strategic plan for ASD research.
Research priorities will be discussed at
the next meeting of the IACC on May 12,
2008.
rmajette on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Name: National Advisory Council on
Migrant Health.
Dates and Times: May 4, 2008, 8:30 a.m.
to 5 p.m.; May 5, 2008, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Place: InterContinental San Juan Hotel,
5961 Isla Verde Avenue, San Juan, Puerto
Rico 00979, Telephone: (787) 791–6100, Fax:
(787) 253–2510.
Status: The meeting will be open to the
public.
Purpose: The purpose of the meeting is to
discuss services and issues related to the
health of migrant and seasonal farmworkers
and their families and to formulate
recommendations for the Secretary of Health
and Human Services.
Agenda: The agenda includes an overview
of the Council’s general business activities.
The Council will also hear presentations
from experts on farmworker issues, including
the status of farmworker health at the local
and national levels.
The Council meeting is being held in
conjunction with the National Farmworker
Health Conference sponsored by the National
Association of Community Health Centers,
which is being held in San Juan, Puerto Rico,
May 6–9, 2008.
Agenda items are subject to change as
priorities indicate.
For Further Information Contact: Gladys
Cate, Office of Minority and Special
Populations, Bureau of Primary Health Care,
Health Resources and Services
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Maryland
20857; telephone (301) 594–0367.
Name of Committee: Interagency Autism
Coordinating Committee (IACC).
Type of meeting: Strategic Planning
Workgroup.
Date: April 21, 2008.
Time: 11 a.m. to 6 p.m.
Agenda: Review of ongoing ASD research,
proposed funding initiatives, and research
resources; discussion and characterization of
high priority research areas for developing
the IACC strategic plan for ASD research.
Place: National Institutes of Health,
Neuroscience Center, Conference Room D,
6001 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892–
9669.
Contact Person: Tanya Pryor, National
Institute of Mental Health, NIH, 6001
Executive Boulevard, NSC, Room 6198,
Bethesda, MD 20892–9669, 301–443–7153,
pryort@mail.nih.gov.
Information about the IACC is available on
the Web site: https://www.nimh.nih.gov/
research-funding/scientific-meetings/
recurring-meetings/iacc/index.shtml.
Dated: March 26, 2008.
Alexandra Huttinger,
Director, Division of Policy Review and
Coordination.
[FR Doc. E8–6784 Filed 4–1–08; 8:45 am]
Dated: March 27, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8–6710 Filed 4–1–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
15:36 Apr 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
National Institutes of Health
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17991
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[FWS–R4–R–2008–N0004; 40136–1265–
0000–S3]
J.N. ‘‘Ding’’ Darling National Wildlife
Refuge, Lee County, FL
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a
comprehensive conservation plan and
environmental assessment; request for
comments; re-opening of comment
period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), intend to
prepare a comprehensive conservation
plan (CCP) and associated National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
documents for J.N. ‘‘Ding’’ Darling
National Wildlife Refuge. We provide
this notice in compliance with our CCP
policy to advise other agencies, Tribes,
and the public of our intentions, and to
obtain suggestions and information on
the scope of issues to consider in the
planning process. We reopen the
comment period, which originally
ended on August 13, 2007, as
announced in the Federal Register on
June 27, 2007 (72 FR 35254). If you have
already submitted comments, you are
not required to resubmit them.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we
must receive your written comments by
May 19, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments, questions, and
requests for more information regarding
the J.N. ‘‘Ding’’ Darling National
Wildlife Refuge planning process
should be sent to: Laura Housh,
Regional Planner, Okefenokee National
Wildlife Refuge, Route 2, Box 3330,
Folkston, GA 31537.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura Housh; Telephone: 912/496–7366,
Extension 244; Fax: 912/496–3332.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we re-open the
comment period and initiate our process
for developing a CCP for J.N. ‘‘Ding’’
Darling National Wildlife Refuge in Lee
County, FL. This notice complies with
our CCP policy to (1) advise other
Federal and State agencies, Tribes, and
the public of our intention to conduct
detailed planning on this refuge, and (2)
obtain suggestions and information on
the scope of issues to consider in the
environmental document and during
development of the CCP.
E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM
02APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 64 (Wednesday, April 2, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17989-17991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-6705]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0183]
Third-Party Certification Programs for Foods and Feeds; Request
for Comments
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is requesting comments
on the use of third-party certification programs for foods and feeds,
including pet foods. An increasing number of firms that sell foods to
the public, such as retailers and food service providers, are
requesting that their suppliers become certified as meeting food (and
feed) safety and quality standards as a condition of doing business.
FDA seeks more information on the existence and use of these types of
programs to better understand how they can help to ensure that food
products are safe, secure, and meet FDA requirements.
DATES: Submit written or electronic comments by May 19, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon Lindan Mayl, Office of Policy
(HF-11), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD
20857, 301-827-3360.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Ensuring the safety of food for human and animal use is a shared
responsibility between the public and private sectors. FDA has the
authority to establish regulatory standards, inspect facilities, and
take action if there are violations, but it is ultimately the
responsibility of industry to ensure that food and feed intended for
consumption in the United States meet applicable FDA standards. An
increasing number of firms that sell foods and feeds (hereinafter
foods) to the public, such as retailers and food service providers, are
requesting that their suppliers, both foreign and domestic, become
certified as meeting food safety and quality standards as a condition
of doing business. In addition, domestic and foreign suppliers (such as
producers, co-manufacturers, or re-packers) are increasingly looking to
third parties to assist them in meeting U.S. requirements. FDA is
seeking comment on current practices of third-party certification
programs that work with food products and to ensure the supply chain is
safe, secure, and meet FDA requirements.
A. Current Use of Voluntary Third-Party Certification Programs for
Foods
A growing number of food firms require their suppliers to ensure
their products are produced using ``best practices'' for food safety,
quality, and security and that the supply chain is safe and secure.
These firms often require their suppliers to meet nationally or
globally recognized food safety standards and to verify that these
standards are met through a third-party certification program. For
example, the Global Food Safety Initiative requires food suppliers to
have a factory audit certification against internationally recognized
standards, which include the Safe Quality Food, British Retail
Consortium, International Food Standard, and GlobalGAP. The Global
Aquaculture Alliance has also established standards for aquaculture
production and processing and created an accrediting body for
certifiers from 30 countries. These types of private sector developed
programs are being used in many foreign countries, as well as the
United States.
B. Interagency Working Group on Import Safety
On July 18, 2007, the President issued Executive Order 13439 to
establish the Interagency Working Group on Import Safety (Working
Group). On November 6, 2007, the Working Group released an ``Action
Plan for Import Safety: A Roadmap for Continual Improvement'' (Action
Plan) (https://www.importsafety.gov/report/actionplan.pdf). The Action
Plan contains 14 broad recommendations and 50 specific short- and long-
term action steps to better protect consumers and enhance the safety of
the increasing volume of imports entering the United States. The Action
Plan stresses the importance of the private sector's responsibility for
the safety of its products and the importance of ongoing private-sector
mechanisms and experience as a basis for ongoing, substantive public-
private collaboration. The public and private sectors have a shared
interest in import safety, and substantive improvement will require the
careful collaboration of the entire importing community.
[[Page 17990]]
Recommendation 2 of the Action Plan is to ``verify compliance of
foreign producers with United States safety and security standards
through certification.'' Third-party certification can augment the
Federal Government's and the importing community's ability to ensure
that products imported into the United States meet U.S. safety and
security standards. The Action Plan states ``[f]or foreign producers,
the ability to participate in voluntary certification programs could
allow products from firms that comply with U.S. safety and security
standards to enter the United States more quickly. This would
facilitate trade, while allowing federal departments and agencies to
focus their resources on products from non-certified firms or for which
information suggests there may be safety or security concerns. This
would allow federal departments and agencies to more effectively target
their resources. It may not be necessary to establish certification
programs for low-risk products.''
Action Steps 2.2 and 2.4 of the Action Plan call for the
development of voluntary third-party certification programs based on
risk for foreign producers of certain products who export to the United
States and the creation of incentives for foreign firms to participate
in voluntary certification programs and for importers to purchase only
from certified firms.
In conjunction with the Action Plan, on November 6, 2007, FDA
released its Food Protection Plan (FPP), a comprehensive initiative
designed to bolster efforts to better protect the Nation's food supply
(https://www.fda.gov/oc/initiatives/advance/food/plan.html).
Although certification by an independent third party would not
replace an FDA inspection, and FDA would continue to inspect a firm
itself, as appropriate based on risk, third-party certification could
provide additional assurances of safety. In addition, third-party
certification could provide FDA with important information about the
ability of specific food suppliers to meet FDA requirements and to
better focus the use of our resources based on risk. FDA believes that
eligible third parties should include other Federal government, State
government, and foreign government agencies and officials.
If FDA were to develop or recognize (or accredit) one or more
independent third-party certification programs, we would provide an
opportunity for both foreign and domestic firms to voluntarily
participate. However, FDA would need sufficient confidence in the
quality of the audits performed and the validity of the decisions to
certify by the third parties as well as the independence of the third
parties from the firms they certify before we would consider
recognizing a third-party certification program.
One action FDA will take to implement the Action Plan and the FPP
is to accredit independent third parties, or to recognize entities that
accredit, to evaluate compliance with FDA requirements. This notice
represents FDA's first step in soliciting public input in the design
and development or recognition of third-party certification programs.
II. Request for Information
FDA is seeking information on the use of third-party certification
programs. In addition to general information, we are posing several
specific questions related to these types of programs.
1. What domestic and foreign third-party certification programs for
suppliers are currently in use by U.S. companies?
FDA is aware of several third-party certification programs that are
currently being used in the United States. We would like more
information regarding these and other certification programs, the
standards on which they are based, and who is currently using these
third-party programs. In addition, we would like information on the
standards and procedures used to ensure that the third parties used are
independent (i.e., without conflicts of interest), the standards used
to accredit third parties, who accredits these third parties, and how
and by whom these third parties are audited and evaluated for
performance. We would also like to know how national government bodies
interface with or recognize these certification programs.
2. Do the current third-party certification programs ensure compliance
with FDA requirements?
Third-party certification programs for foods are used widely in
Europe. These types of certification programs are becoming more popular
in other parts of the world, including the United States. FDA solicits
comment on whether the requirements for certification used by these
programs encompass FDA requirements. If not, what modifications need to
be made for the U.S. marketplace? Should FDA recognize (or accredit)
any of these programs? Should FDA participate in future modifications
to any of these programs? If so, in what capacity?
3. What are the obstacles to private sector participation in these
third-party certification programs?
Although the use of third-party certification programs is growing,
they are not used by the majority of U.S. food firms. FDA seeks
information about any barriers that may exist to using third-party
certification programs. Are retailers and suppliers aware of these
programs? Are these programs widely available? Are they cost effective?
Are there particular obstacles for small businesses?
4. What incentives would increase participation in these third-party
certification programs?
FDA recognizes that there are business and legal incentives to
using third-party certification programs. We would like to know what
incentives could increase participation in these certification
programs. For example, would expedited treatment at U.S. ports of entry
significantly encourage foreign suppliers to participate or domestic
firms to make participation by foreign or domestic suppliers a
condition of doing business with them? Would making the names of
certified firms publicly available, such as through a publicly
accessible database, significantly encourage participation in these
programs by foreign or domestic suppliers? Would FDA considering
certification as one factor in determining inspection priorities
provide a significant incentive for foreign or domestic firms to
participate? Are there other incentives that would increase
participation for imported foods? For domestic foods?
III. How to Submit Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov or two paper copies of any mailed comments, except
that individuals may submit one paper copy. Comments are to be
identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Please note that on January 15, 2008, the FDA Division of Dockets
Management Web site transitioned to the Federal Dockets Management
System (FDMS). FDMS is a Government-wide, electronic docket management
system. Electronic
[[Page 17991]]
comments or submissions will be accepted by FDA through FDMS only.
Dated: March 27, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E8-6705 Filed 4-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S