Pennsylvania Regulatory Program, 17268-17270 [E8-6715]
Download as PDF
17268
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 1, 2008 / Proposed Rules
8. In paragraph (a) of § 305.20, add the
phrase ‘‘metal halide lamp fixtures,’’
after the phrase ‘‘fluorescent lamp
ballasts,’’ and add paragraph (e) to read
as follows:
§ 305.20
Paper catalogs and Web sites.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Any manufacturer, distributor,
retailer, or private labeler who
advertises metal halide lamp fixtures
manufactured on or after January 1,
2009 in a catalog, from which they may
be purchased by cash, charge account or
credit terms, shall disclose
conspicuously in such catalog, in each
description of such metal halide lamp
fixture, a capital letter ‘‘E’’ printed
within a circle.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–6566 Filed 3–31–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 938
[PA–150–FOR; OSM–2008–0002]
Pennsylvania Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; removal of
required amendment.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are announcing receipt of
a request to remove a required
amendment to the Pennsylvania
regulatory program (the ‘‘Pennsylvania
program’’) under the Surface Mining
Control and Reclamation Act of 1977
(SMCRA or the Act). In response to a
required program amendment codified
in the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
938.16(uuu), Pennsylvania has
submitted rationale that it believes
supports its position that current
program provisions are sufficient to
render its program no less effective than
the Federal requirements and, therefore,
no amendment is necessary. The
required amendment pertains to
regulatory exemptions for coal
extraction incidental to the extraction of
other minerals.
This document gives the times and
locations that the Pennsylvania program
and this request are available for your
inspection, the comment period during
which you may submit written
comments, and the procedures that we
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:36 Mar 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
will follow for the public hearing, if one
is requested.
DATES: We will accept written
comments until 4 p.m., local time May
1, 2008. If requested, we will hold a
public hearing on April 28, 2008. We
will accept requests to speak at a
hearing until 4 p.m., local time on April
16, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following two methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. The proposed rule
has been assigned Docket ID: OSM–
2008–0002. If you would like to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and do the
following. Click on the ‘‘Advanced
Docket Search’’ button on the right side
of the screen. Type in the Docket ID
OSM–2008–0002 and click the
‘‘Submit’’ button at the bottom of the
page. The next screen will display the
Docket Search Results for the
rulemaking. If you click on OSM–2008–
0002, you can view the proposed rule
and submit a comment. You can also
view supporting material and any
comments submitted by others.
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Mr. George
Rieger, Chief, Pittsburgh Field
Division, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 415
Market Street, Room 304, Harrisburg,
PA 17101.
Instructions: For detailed instructions
on submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the ‘‘Public Comment Procedures’’
heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: In addition to obtaining
copies of documents at https://
www.regulations.gov, information may
also be obtained at the addresses listed
below during normal business hours,
Monday through Friday, excluding
holidays. You may receive one free copy
of the amendment by contacting OSM’s
Pittsburgh Field Division.
Mr. George Rieger, Chief, Pittsburgh
Field Division, Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement, 415 Market Street,
Room 304, Harrisburg, PA 17101,
(717) 782–4036. E-mail:
grieger@osmre.gov.
Joseph P. Pizarchik, Director, Bureau of
Mining and Reclamation,
Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection, Rachel
Carson State Office Building, P.O. Box
8461, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
17105–8461, Telephone: (717) 787–
5015. E-mail: jpizarchik@state.pa.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
George Rieger, Chief, Pittsburgh Field
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Division, Telephone: (717) 782–4036. Email: grieger@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Pennsylvania Program
II. Description of the Request
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Pennsylvania
Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its program
includes, among other things, ‘‘a State
law which provides for the regulation of
surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the
requirements of this Act. * * *; and
rules and regulations consistent with
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.’’ See 30 U.S.C.
1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of these
criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the
Pennsylvania program on July 30, 1982.
You can find background information
on the Pennsylvania program, including
the Secretary’s findings, the disposition
of comments, and conditions of
approval of the Pennsylvania program
in the July 30, 1982, Federal Register
(47 FR 33050). You can also find later
actions concerning the Pennsylvania
program and program amendments at 30
CFR 938.11, 938.12, 938.13, 938.15 and
938.16.
II. Description of the Request
By letter dated December 18, 2007
(Administrative Record Number PA
892.00), Pennsylvania sent us a
response to a program amendment that
was required by OSMRE in a final rule
notice published in the Federal Register
on November 7, 1997 (62 FR 60177) and
codified in the Federal Regulations at 30
CFR 938.16(uuu). Pennsylvania states
that it believes that current
Pennsylvania program regulations are
sufficient to render its program no less
effective than the Federal requirements
at 30 CFR 702.17(c)(2) and (c)(3),
Exemption for Coal Extraction
Incidental to the Extraction of Other
Minerals and, therefore, a program
amendment is not necessary.
This required amendment provided
that Pennsylvania submit an
amendment to provide counterparts to
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
702.15(d), (e), (f), and 702.17(c)(2), and
(c)(3). The Federal regulations pertain to
(1) conditions of exemption and right of
inspection and entry; and (2) revocation
and enforcement. Pennsylvania submits
that its regulatory program already
E:\FR\FM\01APP1.SGM
01APP1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 1, 2008 / Proposed Rules
contains counterparts to the Federal
regulations and, therefore, is as effective
as the Federal regulations pertaining to
incidental coal extraction. Pennsylvania
requests that we remove the condition
found at 30 CFR 938.16(uuu) on this
basis.
In summary, the Federal regulations
and PADEP rationale are provided as
follows:
Federal Regulations: 30 CFR 702.15,
Conditions of exemption and Right of
Inspection and Entry, provides the
following with regard to exemptions for
coal extraction incidental to the
extraction of other minerals:
(d) Authorized representatives of the
regulatory authority and the Secretary
shall have the right to conduct
inspections of operations claming
exemption under this part.
(e) Each authorized representative of
the regulatory authority and the
Secretary conducting an inspection
under this part:
(1) Shall have a right of entry to,
upon, and through any mining and
reclamation operations without advance
notice or search warrant, upon
presentation of appropriate credentials;
(2) May, at reasonable times and
without delay, have access to and copy
any records relevant to the exemption;
and
(3) Shall have a right to gather
physical and photographic evidence to
document conditions, practices, or
violations at a site.
(f) No search warrant shall be required
with respect to any activity under
paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section,
except that a search warrant may be
required for entry into a building.
PADEP Response: OSM’s review of 25
Pennsylvania Code (Pa Code) Section
86.5 in the 1997 rulemaking did not
include a discussion of the need for 25
Pa Code Section 86.5 to be revised to
add counterparts to the Federal
regulations at 30 CFR 702.15(d), (e), and
(f). Thus, it is not clear why OSM
considered 25 Pa Code Section 86.5 to
be less effective than the Federal
regulations with respect to the right to
conduct inspections and right of entry
for operations extracting coal incidental
to surface mining.
Pennsylvania’s non-coal mining
regulations in 25 Pa Code Chapter 77,
(which persons claiming exemption
under 25 Pa Code Section 86.5 are
subject to pursuant to 25 Pa Code
Section 86.5(a)), provide counterparts to
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
702.15(d), (e), and (f). Furthermore, it
provides broader authority to
Pennsylvania’s authorized
representatives given that they may
enter a building at a surface mine site
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:36 Mar 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
for purposes of inspection or
investigation without being required to
obtain a search warrant.
Federal Regulations: 30 CFR
702.17(c)(2) and (c)(3), Revocation and
Enforcement, provides that:
(c)(1) If the regulatory authority finds
that an operator has not demonstrated
that activities conducted in the mining
area qualify for the exemption, the
regulatory authority shall revoke the
exemption and immediately notify the
operator and intervenors. If a decision is
made not to revoke an exemption, the
regulatory authority shall immediately
notify the operator and intervenors.
(2) Any adversely affected person may
request administrative review of a
decision whether to revoke an
exemption within 30 days of the
notification of such decision in
accordance with procedures established
under 43 CFR 4.1280 when OSM is the
regulatory authority or under
corresponding state procedures when a
State is the regulatory authority.
(3) A petition for administrative
review filed under 43 CFR 4.1280 or
under corresponding State procedures
shall not suspend the effect of a
decision whether to revoke an
exemption.
PADEP’s Response: OSM’s required
amendment at 30 CFR 938.16(uuu) with
respect to Pennsylvania counterparts for
30 CFR 702.17(c)(2) and (c)(3) also was
not discussed in the 1997 rulemaking.
More importantly, this part of the
required amendment actually conflicts
with OSM’s own findings in the 1997
rulemaking.
In the 1997 rulemaking, OSM
determined that 25 Pa Code Section
86.5(o) is identical in meaning to 30
CFR 702.17(c)(2); 25 Pa Code Section
86.5(o) is identical in meaning to 30
CFR 702.17(c)(2); and that 25 Pa Code
Section 86.5(n) is identical in meaning
to 30 CFR 702.17(c)(3). See Federal
Register (62 FR 60169–70 and Table A).
OSM then concluded: ‘‘Because the
above proposed revisions (listed in
Table A) are identical in meaning to the
corresponding Federal regulations, the
Director finds that Pennsylvania’s
proposed rules are no less effective than
the Federal rules.’’ Thus, the portion of
30 CFR 938.16(uuu) pertaining to
counterparts to 30 CFR 702.17(c)(2) and
(c)(3) appears to be an error.
In any event, Pennsylvania submits
that statutory and regulation sections
regarding the right of appeal to the
Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing
Board provide counterparts to 30 CFR
702.17(c)(2) and (c)(3). These sections
are the Environmental Hearing Board
(EHB) Act at 35 Pennsylvania Statute
7511–7516; 25 Pa Code Chapter 1021
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17269
(EHB procedural rules); 25 Pa Code
Section 1021.2 (defining ‘‘action’’ of the
department), and Section 1021.51
(commencement of an appeal).
Therefore, Pennsylvania submits that its
regulatory program already contains
counterparts to the Federal regulations
at 30 CFR 702.17(c)(2) and (c)(3), which
are as effective as the Federal
regulations.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR
732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the amendment
satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we
approve the amendment, it will become
part of the Pennsylvania program.
Written Comments
Send your written comments to OSM
at the address given above. Your written
comments should be specific, pertain
only to the issues proposed in this
rulemaking, and include explanations in
support of your recommendations. We
may not consider or respond to your
comments when developing the final
rule if they are received after the close
of the comment period (see DATES). We
will make every attempt to log all
comments into the administrative
record, but comments delivered to an
address other than the Pittsburgh Field
Division identified above may not be
logged in.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4
p.m., local time on April 16, 2008. If
you are disabled and need special
accommodations to attend a public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We
will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting
the hearing. If no one requests an
opportunity to speak, we will not hold
the hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an
accurate record, we request, if possible,
that each person who speaks at a public
E:\FR\FM\01APP1.SGM
01APP1
17270
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 1, 2008 / Proposed Rules
hearing provide us with a written copy
of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified
date until everyone scheduled to speak
has been given an opportunity to be
heard. If you are in the audience and
have not been scheduled to speak and
wish to do so, you will be allowed to
speak after those who have been
scheduled. We will end the hearing after
everyone scheduled to speak and others
present in the audience who wish to
speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an
opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public
hearing. If you wish to meet with us to
discuss the submission, please request a
meeting by contacting the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All such meetings are open to
the public and, if possible, we will post
notices of meetings at the locations
listed under ADDRESSES. We will make
a written summary of each meeting a
part of the administrative record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630—Takings
This rule does not have takings
implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform
The Department of the Interior has
conducted the reviews required by
Section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and
has determined that, to the extent
allowable by law, this rule meets the
applicable standards of Subsections (a)
and (b) of that Section. However, these
standards are not applicable to the
actual language of State regulatory
programs and program amendments
since each such program is drafted and
promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under Sections 503 and 505 of
SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory
programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based
solely on a determination of whether the
submittal is consistent with SMCRA and
its implementing Federal regulations
and whether the other requirements of
30 CFR parts 730, 731, and 732 have
been met.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:36 Mar 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
This rule does not have Federalism
implications. SMCRA delineates the
roles of the Federal and State
governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations. One of the
purposes of SMCRA is to ‘‘establish a
nationwide program to protect society
and the environment from the adverse
effects of surface coal mining
operations.’’ Section 503(a)(1) of
SMCRA requires that State laws
regulating surface coal mining and
reclamation operations be ‘‘in
accordance with’’ the requirements of
SMCRA. Section 503(a)(7) requires that
State programs contain rules and
regulations ‘‘consistent with’’
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, we have evaluated the potential
effects of this rule on Federallyrecognized Indian tribes and have
determined that the rule does not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
The basis for this determination is that
our decision is on a State regulatory
program and does not involve a Federal
program involving Indian lands.
Executive Order 13211—Regulations
That Significantly Affect The Supply,
Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
Executive Order 13211 which requires
agencies to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects for a rule that is (1)
considered significant under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because
this rule is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866 and is not
expected to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, a Statement of Energy Effects
is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
Section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C.
1292(d)) provides that a decision on a
proposed State regulatory program
provision does not constitute major
Federal action within the meaning of
Section 102(2)(C) of the National
Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(c). A determination has been
made that such decisions are
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
categorically excluded from the NEPA
process (516 DM 8.4.A).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior has
determined that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). In making the
determination as to whether this rule
would have a significant economic
impact, the Department relied upon the
analysis for the counterpart Federal
regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule: (a) Does not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million;
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, geographic
regions, or Federal, State or local
governmental agencies; and (c) Does not
have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises. This
determination is based upon the fact
that the State submittal, which is the
subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation was not considered a major
rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose a cost of
$100 million or more in any given year
on any governmental entity or the
private sector.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 938
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: February 29, 2008.
Thomas D. Shope,
Regional Director, Appalachian Region.
[FR Doc. E8–6715 Filed 3–31–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
E:\FR\FM\01APP1.SGM
01APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 63 (Tuesday, April 1, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17268-17270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-6715]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 938
[PA-150-FOR; OSM-2008-0002]
Pennsylvania Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; removal of required amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are announcing receipt of a request to remove a required
amendment to the Pennsylvania regulatory program (the ``Pennsylvania
program'') under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977
(SMCRA or the Act). In response to a required program amendment
codified in the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 938.16(uuu), Pennsylvania
has submitted rationale that it believes supports its position that
current program provisions are sufficient to render its program no less
effective than the Federal requirements and, therefore, no amendment is
necessary. The required amendment pertains to regulatory exemptions for
coal extraction incidental to the extraction of other minerals.
This document gives the times and locations that the Pennsylvania
program and this request are available for your inspection, the comment
period during which you may submit written comments, and the procedures
that we will follow for the public hearing, if one is requested.
DATES: We will accept written comments until 4 p.m., local time May 1,
2008. If requested, we will hold a public hearing on April 28, 2008. We
will accept requests to speak at a hearing until 4 p.m., local time on
April 16, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following two
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. The
proposed rule has been assigned Docket ID: OSM-2008-0002. If you would
like to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal, go to
https://www.regulations.gov and do the following. Click on the
``Advanced Docket Search'' button on the right side of the screen. Type
in the Docket ID OSM-2008-0002 and click the ``Submit'' button at the
bottom of the page. The next screen will display the Docket Search
Results for the rulemaking. If you click on OSM-2008-0002, you can view
the proposed rule and submit a comment. You can also view supporting
material and any comments submitted by others.
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Mr. George Rieger, Chief, Pittsburgh Field
Division, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 415
Market Street, Room 304, Harrisburg, PA 17101.
Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Public
Comment Procedures'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this document.
Docket: In addition to obtaining copies of documents at https://
www.regulations.gov, information may also be obtained at the addresses
listed below during normal business hours, Monday through Friday,
excluding holidays. You may receive one free copy of the amendment by
contacting OSM's Pittsburgh Field Division.
Mr. George Rieger, Chief, Pittsburgh Field Division, Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 415 Market Street, Room 304,
Harrisburg, PA 17101, (717) 782-4036. E-mail: grieger@osmre.gov.
Joseph P. Pizarchik, Director, Bureau of Mining and Reclamation,
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Rachel Carson
State Office Building, P.O. Box 8461, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105-
8461, Telephone: (717) 787-5015. E-mail: jpizarchik@state.pa.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. George Rieger, Chief, Pittsburgh
Field Division, Telephone: (717) 782-4036. E-mail: grieger@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Pennsylvania Program
II. Description of the Request
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Pennsylvania Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its program includes, among other things, ``a State law which provides
for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations in
accordance with the requirements of this Act. * * *; and rules and
regulations consistent with regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.'' See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis
of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally approved
the Pennsylvania program on July 30, 1982. You can find background
information on the Pennsylvania program, including the Secretary's
findings, the disposition of comments, and conditions of approval of
the Pennsylvania program in the July 30, 1982, Federal Register (47 FR
33050). You can also find later actions concerning the Pennsylvania
program and program amendments at 30 CFR 938.11, 938.12, 938.13, 938.15
and 938.16.
II. Description of the Request
By letter dated December 18, 2007 (Administrative Record Number PA
892.00), Pennsylvania sent us a response to a program amendment that
was required by OSMRE in a final rule notice published in the Federal
Register on November 7, 1997 (62 FR 60177) and codified in the Federal
Regulations at 30 CFR 938.16(uuu). Pennsylvania states that it believes
that current Pennsylvania program regulations are sufficient to render
its program no less effective than the Federal requirements at 30 CFR
702.17(c)(2) and (c)(3), Exemption for Coal Extraction Incidental to
the Extraction of Other Minerals and, therefore, a program amendment is
not necessary.
This required amendment provided that Pennsylvania submit an
amendment to provide counterparts to the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
702.15(d), (e), (f), and 702.17(c)(2), and (c)(3). The Federal
regulations pertain to (1) conditions of exemption and right of
inspection and entry; and (2) revocation and enforcement. Pennsylvania
submits that its regulatory program already
[[Page 17269]]
contains counterparts to the Federal regulations and, therefore, is as
effective as the Federal regulations pertaining to incidental coal
extraction. Pennsylvania requests that we remove the condition found at
30 CFR 938.16(uuu) on this basis.
In summary, the Federal regulations and PADEP rationale are
provided as follows:
Federal Regulations: 30 CFR 702.15, Conditions of exemption and
Right of Inspection and Entry, provides the following with regard to
exemptions for coal extraction incidental to the extraction of other
minerals:
(d) Authorized representatives of the regulatory authority and the
Secretary shall have the right to conduct inspections of operations
claming exemption under this part.
(e) Each authorized representative of the regulatory authority and
the Secretary conducting an inspection under this part:
(1) Shall have a right of entry to, upon, and through any mining
and reclamation operations without advance notice or search warrant,
upon presentation of appropriate credentials;
(2) May, at reasonable times and without delay, have access to and
copy any records relevant to the exemption; and
(3) Shall have a right to gather physical and photographic evidence
to document conditions, practices, or violations at a site.
(f) No search warrant shall be required with respect to any
activity under paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, except that a
search warrant may be required for entry into a building.
PADEP Response: OSM's review of 25 Pennsylvania Code (Pa Code)
Section 86.5 in the 1997 rulemaking did not include a discussion of the
need for 25 Pa Code Section 86.5 to be revised to add counterparts to
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 702.15(d), (e), and (f). Thus, it is
not clear why OSM considered 25 Pa Code Section 86.5 to be less
effective than the Federal regulations with respect to the right to
conduct inspections and right of entry for operations extracting coal
incidental to surface mining.
Pennsylvania's non-coal mining regulations in 25 Pa Code Chapter
77, (which persons claiming exemption under 25 Pa Code Section 86.5 are
subject to pursuant to 25 Pa Code Section 86.5(a)), provide
counterparts to the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 702.15(d), (e), and
(f). Furthermore, it provides broader authority to Pennsylvania's
authorized representatives given that they may enter a building at a
surface mine site for purposes of inspection or investigation without
being required to obtain a search warrant.
Federal Regulations: 30 CFR 702.17(c)(2) and (c)(3), Revocation and
Enforcement, provides that:
(c)(1) If the regulatory authority finds that an operator has not
demonstrated that activities conducted in the mining area qualify for
the exemption, the regulatory authority shall revoke the exemption and
immediately notify the operator and intervenors. If a decision is made
not to revoke an exemption, the regulatory authority shall immediately
notify the operator and intervenors.
(2) Any adversely affected person may request administrative review
of a decision whether to revoke an exemption within 30 days of the
notification of such decision in accordance with procedures established
under 43 CFR 4.1280 when OSM is the regulatory authority or under
corresponding state procedures when a State is the regulatory
authority.
(3) A petition for administrative review filed under 43 CFR 4.1280
or under corresponding State procedures shall not suspend the effect of
a decision whether to revoke an exemption.
PADEP's Response: OSM's required amendment at 30 CFR 938.16(uuu)
with respect to Pennsylvania counterparts for 30 CFR 702.17(c)(2) and
(c)(3) also was not discussed in the 1997 rulemaking. More importantly,
this part of the required amendment actually conflicts with OSM's own
findings in the 1997 rulemaking.
In the 1997 rulemaking, OSM determined that 25 Pa Code Section
86.5(o) is identical in meaning to 30 CFR 702.17(c)(2); 25 Pa Code
Section 86.5(o) is identical in meaning to 30 CFR 702.17(c)(2); and
that 25 Pa Code Section 86.5(n) is identical in meaning to 30 CFR
702.17(c)(3). See Federal Register (62 FR 60169-70 and Table A). OSM
then concluded: ``Because the above proposed revisions (listed in Table
A) are identical in meaning to the corresponding Federal regulations,
the Director finds that Pennsylvania's proposed rules are no less
effective than the Federal rules.'' Thus, the portion of 30 CFR
938.16(uuu) pertaining to counterparts to 30 CFR 702.17(c)(2) and
(c)(3) appears to be an error.
In any event, Pennsylvania submits that statutory and regulation
sections regarding the right of appeal to the Pennsylvania
Environmental Hearing Board provide counterparts to 30 CFR 702.17(c)(2)
and (c)(3). These sections are the Environmental Hearing Board (EHB)
Act at 35 Pennsylvania Statute 7511-7516; 25 Pa Code Chapter 1021 (EHB
procedural rules); 25 Pa Code Section 1021.2 (defining ``action'' of
the department), and Section 1021.51 (commencement of an appeal).
Therefore, Pennsylvania submits that its regulatory program already
contains counterparts to the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 702.17(c)(2)
and (c)(3), which are as effective as the Federal regulations.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the amendment satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve the amendment, it
will become part of the Pennsylvania program.
Written Comments
Send your written comments to OSM at the address given above. Your
written comments should be specific, pertain only to the issues
proposed in this rulemaking, and include explanations in support of
your recommendations. We may not consider or respond to your comments
when developing the final rule if they are received after the close of
the comment period (see DATES). We will make every attempt to log all
comments into the administrative record, but comments delivered to an
address other than the Pittsburgh Field Division identified above may
not be logged in.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public hearing, contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4 p.m., local time on
April 16, 2008. If you are disabled and need special accommodations to
attend a public hearing, contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. We will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting the hearing. If no one requests
an opportunity to speak, we will not hold the hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an accurate record, we
request, if possible, that each person who speaks at a public
[[Page 17270]]
hearing provide us with a written copy of his or her comments. The
public hearing will continue on the specified date until everyone
scheduled to speak has been given an opportunity to be heard. If you
are in the audience and have not been scheduled to speak and wish to do
so, you will be allowed to speak after those who have been scheduled.
We will end the hearing after everyone scheduled to speak and others
present in the audience who wish to speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public hearing. If you wish to meet with
us to discuss the submission, please request a meeting by contacting
the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All such
meetings are open to the public and, if possible, we will post notices
of meetings at the locations listed under ADDRESSES. We will make a
written summary of each meeting a part of the administrative record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630--Takings
This rule does not have takings implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the counterpart Federal
regulations.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required
by Section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and has determined that, to the
extent allowable by law, this rule meets the applicable standards of
Subsections (a) and (b) of that Section. However, these standards are
not applicable to the actual language of State regulatory programs and
program amendments since each such program is drafted and promulgated
by a specific State, not by OSM. Under Sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA
(30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 730.11,
732.15, and 732.17(h)(10), decisions on proposed State regulatory
programs and program amendments submitted by the States must be based
solely on a determination of whether the submittal is consistent with
SMCRA and its implementing Federal regulations and whether the other
requirements of 30 CFR parts 730, 731, and 732 have been met.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This rule does not have Federalism implications. SMCRA delineates
the roles of the Federal and State governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations. One of
the purposes of SMCRA is to ``establish a nationwide program to protect
society and the environment from the adverse effects of surface coal
mining operations.'' Section 503(a)(1) of SMCRA requires that State
laws regulating surface coal mining and reclamation operations be ``in
accordance with'' the requirements of SMCRA. Section 503(a)(7) requires
that State programs contain rules and regulations ``consistent with''
regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, we have evaluated the
potential effects of this rule on Federally-recognized Indian tribes
and have determined that the rule does not have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
The basis for this determination is that our decision is on a State
regulatory program and does not involve a Federal program involving
Indian lands.
Executive Order 13211--Regulations That Significantly Affect The
Supply, Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued Executive Order 13211 which
requires agencies to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects for a rule
that is (1) considered significant under Executive Order 12866, and (2)
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because this rule is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866 and is not expected to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy, a
Statement of Energy Effects is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
Section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that a
decision on a proposed State regulatory program provision does not
constitute major Federal action within the meaning of Section 102(2)(C)
of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c). A
determination has been made that such decisions are categorically
excluded from the NEPA process (516 DM 8.4.A).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior has determined that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
In making the determination as to whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the analysis
for the counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule: (a) Does not
have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million; (b) Will not
cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual
industries, geographic regions, or Federal, State or local governmental
agencies; and (c) Does not have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises. This determination is based upon the fact that the State
submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon counterpart
Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal regulation was not considered a
major rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose a cost of $100 million or more in any
given year on any governmental entity or the private sector.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 938
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: February 29, 2008.
Thomas D. Shope,
Regional Director, Appalachian Region.
[FR Doc. E8-6715 Filed 3-31-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P