Notice of Final Priority, Definitions, Requirements, and Selection Criteria, 17868-17870 [E8-6678]
Download as PDF
17868
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 1, 2008 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Notice of Final Priority, Definitions,
Requirements, and Selection Criteria
Office of Safe and Drug-Free
Schools, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of final priority,
definitions, requirements, and selection
criteria.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES3
SUMMARY: The Assistant Deputy
Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free
Schools announces a priority,
definitions, requirements, and selection
criteria under the Models of Exemplary,
Effective, and Promising Alcohol or
Other Drug Abuse Prevention Programs
on College Campuses grant competition.
The Assistant Deputy Secretary may use
the priority, definitions, requirements,
and selection criteria for competitions
in fiscal year (FY) 2008 and later years.
DATES: Effective Date: The priority,
definitions, requirements, and selection
criteria are effective May 1, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Lucey, Jr., U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
room 3E335, Washington, DC 20202–
6450. Telephone: (202) 205–5471, or by
e-mail: richard.lucey@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), you may call
the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities may
obtain this document in an alternative
format (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We
published a notice of proposed priority,
definitions, requirements, and selection
criteria for this competition in the
Federal Register on December 26, 2007
(72 FR 73012). Except for minor
editorial revisions in the priority, there
are no differences between the notice of
proposed priority, definitions,
requirements, and selection criteria and
this notice of final priority, definitions,
requirements, and selection criteria.
Analysis of Comments and Changes
In response to our invitation in the
notice of proposed priority, definitions,
requirements, and selection criteria, one
party submitted a comment on the
proposed eligibility requirements. An
analysis of the comment and of any
changes in the priority, definitions,
requirements, and selection criteria
since publication of the notice of
proposed priority, definitions,
requirements, and selection criteria
follows.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:37 Mar 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
Generally, we do not address
technical and other minor changes—and
suggested changes the law does not
authorize us to make under the
applicable statutory authority.
Eligible Applicants
Comment: One commenter
recommended that eligible applicants
include the national headquarters or
educational foundations of campusbased fraternities and sororities.
Discussion: We have designed this
program for institutions of higher
education (IHEs) because the emphasis
of this grant program is not only to
recognize an IHE for having
implemented an exemplary, effective, or
promising program on its campus, but
also to assist the IHE in strengthening
the program through enhancement and
further evaluation. This emphasis
encourages and fosters key aspects of
effective campus-based prevention,
including conducting a problem
analysis or needs assessment, setting
goals and objectives that are relevant to
the campus’s identified alcohol or other
drug abuse problems, implementing and
evaluating appropriate prevention and
early intervention strategies, and
identifying and securing the
involvement of a cross-representation of
campus- and community-based
partners.
If we extended eligibility for this grant
program to non-IHEs, we would run the
risk of recognizing entities that are
developing programs for a specific
student population, such as first-year
students, members of fraternities and/or
sororities, and student-athletes, in an
insular manner without any
collaboration or input with the at-large
campus community. Such an approach
would run counter to current prevention
research that demonstrates coalitionbuilding and collaboration with a broad
representation of constituents as a vital
and effective component of a campus’s
alcohol or other drug abuse prevention
efforts. Research strongly supports the
use of comprehensive, integrated
programs with multiple complementary
components that target individuals,
including at-risk or alcohol-dependent
drinkers; the student population as a
whole; and the college and surrounding
community.
Although we do not propose that nonIHEs be eligible for funding under this
grant program, we recognize that nonIHEs can play an important role in
collaborating with an IHE as part of the
campus’s comprehensive alcohol or
other drug abuse prevention efforts and
we strongly encourage such a
relationship. For instance, an IHE may
submit an application for recognition as
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
an exemplary, effective, or promising
program that has evidence of
effectiveness in preventing alcohol or
other drug abuse among members of the
campus’s fraternity and/or sorority
members, and is supported by the
national headquarters or educational
foundations of campus-based
fraternities and sororities.
Changes: None.
Note: This notice does not solicit
applications. In any year in which we choose
to use the priority, definitions, requirements,
and selection criteria, we invite applications
through a notice in the Federal Register.
When inviting applications we designate the
priority as absolute, competitive preference,
or invitational. The effect of each type of
priority follows:
Absolute Priority: Under an absolute
priority we consider only applications
that meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority:
Under a competitive preference priority
we give competitive preference to an
application by either (1) awarding
additional points, depending on how
well or the extent to which the
application meets the competitive
priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2)
selecting an application that meets the
competitive priority over an application
of comparable merit that does not meet
the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an
invitational priority we are particularly
interested in applications that meet the
invitational priority. However, we do
not give an application that meets the
invitational priority a competitive or
absolute preference over other
applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Priority: Exemplary, Effective, and
Promising Alcohol or Other Drug Abuse
Prevention Programs on College
Campuses
Under this priority the Department
provides funding to IHEs that have
implemented an exemplary, effective, or
promising alcohol or other drug abuse
prevention program on their campus. To
meet the priority, in its application, an
applicant must:
1. Describe the program that has for at
least two full years been implemented
on its campus, including the structure
and content of the program, the student
population that is targeted by the
program, and any unique features of the
program;
2. Provide a detailed theoretical basis
for the program’s effectiveness;
3. Provide data to demonstrate the
program’s impact on the target student
population, including evidence of
cognitive or behavioral changes, or both,
among the target population; and
E:\FR\FM\01APN3.SGM
01APN3
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 1, 2008 / Notices
4. Consent to a site visit to clarify
information in the application and
verify evaluation data.
Under this program, the Department
selects an IHE for recognition as having
an exemplary, effective, or promising
program based on the recommendation
from the two peer reviewers who
conduct the site visit. Therefore, note
that selection for a site visit does not
ensure recognition as an exemplary,
effective, or promising program by the
Department.
Recognition Types
Contingent upon the quality of data
provided by the applicant and the
recommendation of site visitors, an
applicant may earn one of three levels
of recognition.
Level 1 is recognition as an exemplary
program. An IHE whose program is
designated as exemplary must:
1. Within 30 days of receiving an
award, provide to the Department a plan
to disseminate information about its
program to other IHEs;
2. Upon approval by the Department,
implement its dissemination plan; and
3. Enhance and further evaluate the
exemplary program during the project
period of the grant award.
Level 2 is recognition as an effective
program. An IHE whose program is
designated as effective must:
1. Within 30 days of receiving an
award, provide to the Department a plan
to disseminate information about its
program to other IHEs;
2. Upon approval by the Department,
implement its dissemination plan; and
3. Enhance and further evaluate the
effective program during the project
period of the grant award.
Level 3 is designation as a promising
program. An IHE whose program is
recognized as promising must:
1. Within 30 days of receiving an
award, submit to the Department a plan
to enhance and further evaluate its
program;
2. Upon approval by the Department,
implement its enhancement and
evaluation plan; and
3. Within 12 months of award,
provide to the Department a report
detailing the results of its evaluation.
mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES3
Definitions
1. Exemplary program means a
program that has a strong theoretical
base and demonstrated effectiveness in
reducing alcohol or other drug abuse
among college students or reducing
problems resulting from alcohol or other
drug use among college students, using
a research design of the highest quality.
For the purpose of this grant
competition, a research design of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:37 Mar 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
highest quality means an experimental
design in which students are randomly
assigned to participate in a project being
evaluated (treatment group) or not
participate in the project (control
group). The effect of the project is the
difference in outcomes between the
treatment and control groups.
If strong, experimentally determined
evidence of the effectiveness of a
program already exists, and the program
was implemented on the applicant’s
campus with fidelity to the research,
then a quasi-experimental evaluation of
the program’s implementation on the
applicant’s campus may be an
acceptable research design. For the
purpose of this grant competition, quasiexperimental designs include several
designs that attempt to approximate a
random assignment design.
2. Effective program means a program
that has a strong theoretical base and
has been evaluated using either an
experimental or quasi-experimental
research design, with the evaluation
results suggesting effectiveness in
reducing alcohol or other drug abuse
among college students, reducing
problems resulting from alcohol or other
drug use among college students,
reducing risk factors, enhancing
protective factors, or resulting in some
combination of those impacts.
3. Promising program means a
program that has a strong theoretical
base and for which evidence has been
obtained, using limited research
methods, that the program may reduce
alcohol or other drug abuse among
college students, reduce problems
resulting from alcohol or other drug use
among college students, reduce risk
factors, enhance protective factors, or
result in some combination of those
impacts. For the purpose of this grant
competition, limited research methods
are methods that include a pre- and
post-treatment measurement of the
effects of a treatment on a single subject
or group of single subjects.
Requirements
Eligible Applicants
Only IHEs that offer an associate or
baccalaureate degree are eligible under
this program.
Limitations on Eligibility
(a) Exemplary or effective programs.
The length of time an IHE is ineligible
for a subsequent award after receiving
recognition for an exemplary or effective
program is three years.
(b) Promising programs. Programs
recognized as promising may be eligible
for a new award when their current
grant is no longer active. A grant is
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
17869
considered active until the end of the
grant’s project or funding period,
including any extensions of those
periods that extend the grantee’s
authority to obligate funds. A project
that fails to achieve exemplary or
effective status after a second
designation as a promising program may
not reapply for three years after its
second project period is no longer
active.
Funding Limits for Applicants
The maximum amount an applicant
may receive for a project recognized as
an exemplary or effective program may
be no more than $150,000 plus indirect
costs, and a project recognized as a
promising program may receive no more
than $100,000 plus indirect costs.
Selection Criteria
1. Significance
(a) The potential contribution of the
program to the development and
advancement of theory, knowledge, and
practices in the field of study.
(b) The quality of the applicant’s plan
to disseminate the program in ways that
will enable others to use the information
or strategies, including evidence of the
program’s readiness for replication.
2. Project Design
(a) The extent to which the design of
the program reflects up-to-date
knowledge from research and effective
practices.
(b) The extent to which the plan to
enhance the program reflects up-to-date
knowledge from research and effective
practices.
(c) The extent to which the goals,
objectives, and outcomes to be achieved
by the enhancement to the program are
clearly specified and measurable.
3. Project Evaluation
(a) The extent to which the evaluation
data provide evidence of the
effectiveness of the program in reducing
alcohol or other drug use, or both,
reducing problems resulting from
alcohol or other drug use, or both,
reducing risk factors, enhancing
protective factors, or some combination
of those impacts.
(b) The extent to which the methods
of evaluation used during the
implementation of the program will
provide guidance about effective
strategies suitable for replication or
testing in other settings.
(c) The extent to which the methods
of evaluation used during the
enhancement of the program will
provide performance feedback and
permit periodic assessment of progress
toward achieving intended outcomes.
E:\FR\FM\01APN3.SGM
01APN3
17870
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 1, 2008 / Notices
Executive Order 12866
mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES3
This notice of final priority,
definitions, requirements, and selection
criteria has been reviewed in
accordance with Executive Order 12866.
Under the terms of the order, we have
assessed the potential costs and benefits
of this regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with
the notice of final priority, definitions,
requirements, and selection criteria are
those resulting from statutory
requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for
administering this program effectively
and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and
benefits—both quantitative and
qualitative—of this notice of final
priority, definitions, requirements, and
selection criteria, we have determined
that the benefits of the final priority,
definitions, requirements, and selection
criteria justify the costs.
We have also determined that this
regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal
governments in the exercise of their
governmental functions.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:37 Mar 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
We summarized the costs and benefits
in the notice of proposed priority,
definitions, requirements, and selection
criteria.
Intergovernmental Review
This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34
CFR part 79. One of the objectives of the
Executive order is to foster an
intergovernmental partnership and a
strengthened federalism. The Executive
order relies on processes developed by
State and local governments for
coordination and review of proposed
Federal financial assistance.
This document provides early
notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well
as all other Department of Education
documents published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable
Document Format (PDF) on the Internet
at the following site: http://www.ed.gov/
news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC area at (202) 512–1530.
You may also view this document in
text at the following site: http://
www.ed.gov/programs/dvpcollege/
applicant.html.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number: 84.184N Office of Safe and DrugFree Schools—Models of Exemplary,
Effective, and Promising Alcohol and Other
Drug Abuse Prevention Programs on College
Campuses)
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7131.
Dated: March 26, 2008.
Deborah A. Price,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Safe and DrugFree Schools.
[FR Doc. E8–6678 Filed 3–31–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
E:\FR\FM\01APN3.SGM
01APN3
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 63 (Tuesday, April 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17868-17870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-6678]
[[Page 17867]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part VI
Department of Education
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice of Final Priority, Definitions, Requirements, and Selection
Criteria; Notice
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 63 / Tuesday, April 1, 2008 /
Notices
[[Page 17868]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Notice of Final Priority, Definitions, Requirements, and
Selection Criteria
AGENCY: Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of final priority, definitions, requirements, and
selection criteria.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Assistant Deputy Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools
announces a priority, definitions, requirements, and selection criteria
under the Models of Exemplary, Effective, and Promising Alcohol or
Other Drug Abuse Prevention Programs on College Campuses grant
competition. The Assistant Deputy Secretary may use the priority,
definitions, requirements, and selection criteria for competitions in
fiscal year (FY) 2008 and later years.
DATES: Effective Date: The priority, definitions, requirements, and
selection criteria are effective May 1, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Lucey, Jr., U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 3E335, Washington, DC 20202-
6450. Telephone: (202) 205-5471, or by e-mail: richard.lucey@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may
call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an
alternative format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) on request to the contact person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We published a notice of proposed priority,
definitions, requirements, and selection criteria for this competition
in the Federal Register on December 26, 2007 (72 FR 73012). Except for
minor editorial revisions in the priority, there are no differences
between the notice of proposed priority, definitions, requirements, and
selection criteria and this notice of final priority, definitions,
requirements, and selection criteria.
Analysis of Comments and Changes
In response to our invitation in the notice of proposed priority,
definitions, requirements, and selection criteria, one party submitted
a comment on the proposed eligibility requirements. An analysis of the
comment and of any changes in the priority, definitions, requirements,
and selection criteria since publication of the notice of proposed
priority, definitions, requirements, and selection criteria follows.
Generally, we do not address technical and other minor changes--and
suggested changes the law does not authorize us to make under the
applicable statutory authority.
Eligible Applicants
Comment: One commenter recommended that eligible applicants include
the national headquarters or educational foundations of campus-based
fraternities and sororities.
Discussion: We have designed this program for institutions of
higher education (IHEs) because the emphasis of this grant program is
not only to recognize an IHE for having implemented an exemplary,
effective, or promising program on its campus, but also to assist the
IHE in strengthening the program through enhancement and further
evaluation. This emphasis encourages and fosters key aspects of
effective campus-based prevention, including conducting a problem
analysis or needs assessment, setting goals and objectives that are
relevant to the campus's identified alcohol or other drug abuse
problems, implementing and evaluating appropriate prevention and early
intervention strategies, and identifying and securing the involvement
of a cross-representation of campus- and community-based partners.
If we extended eligibility for this grant program to non-IHEs, we
would run the risk of recognizing entities that are developing programs
for a specific student population, such as first-year students, members
of fraternities and/or sororities, and student-athletes, in an insular
manner without any collaboration or input with the at-large campus
community. Such an approach would run counter to current prevention
research that demonstrates coalition-building and collaboration with a
broad representation of constituents as a vital and effective component
of a campus's alcohol or other drug abuse prevention efforts. Research
strongly supports the use of comprehensive, integrated programs with
multiple complementary components that target individuals, including
at-risk or alcohol-dependent drinkers; the student population as a
whole; and the college and surrounding community.
Although we do not propose that non-IHEs be eligible for funding
under this grant program, we recognize that non-IHEs can play an
important role in collaborating with an IHE as part of the campus's
comprehensive alcohol or other drug abuse prevention efforts and we
strongly encourage such a relationship. For instance, an IHE may submit
an application for recognition as an exemplary, effective, or promising
program that has evidence of effectiveness in preventing alcohol or
other drug abuse among members of the campus's fraternity and/or
sorority members, and is supported by the national headquarters or
educational foundations of campus-based fraternities and sororities.
Changes: None.
Note: This notice does not solicit applications. In any year in
which we choose to use the priority, definitions, requirements, and
selection criteria, we invite applications through a notice in the
Federal Register. When inviting applications we designate the
priority as absolute, competitive preference, or invitational. The
effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute Priority: Under an absolute priority we consider only
applications that meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority: Under a competitive preference
priority we give competitive preference to an application by either (1)
awarding additional points, depending on how well or the extent to
which the application meets the competitive priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting an application that meets the
competitive priority over an application of comparable merit that does
not meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an invitational priority we are
particularly interested in applications that meet the invitational
priority. However, we do not give an application that meets the
invitational priority a competitive or absolute preference over other
applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Priority: Exemplary, Effective, and Promising Alcohol or Other Drug
Abuse Prevention Programs on College Campuses
Under this priority the Department provides funding to IHEs that
have implemented an exemplary, effective, or promising alcohol or other
drug abuse prevention program on their campus. To meet the priority, in
its application, an applicant must:
1. Describe the program that has for at least two full years been
implemented on its campus, including the structure and content of the
program, the student population that is targeted by the program, and
any unique features of the program;
2. Provide a detailed theoretical basis for the program's
effectiveness;
3. Provide data to demonstrate the program's impact on the target
student population, including evidence of cognitive or behavioral
changes, or both, among the target population; and
[[Page 17869]]
4. Consent to a site visit to clarify information in the
application and verify evaluation data.
Under this program, the Department selects an IHE for recognition
as having an exemplary, effective, or promising program based on the
recommendation from the two peer reviewers who conduct the site visit.
Therefore, note that selection for a site visit does not ensure
recognition as an exemplary, effective, or promising program by the
Department.
Recognition Types
Contingent upon the quality of data provided by the applicant and
the recommendation of site visitors, an applicant may earn one of three
levels of recognition.
Level 1 is recognition as an exemplary program. An IHE whose
program is designated as exemplary must:
1. Within 30 days of receiving an award, provide to the Department
a plan to disseminate information about its program to other IHEs;
2. Upon approval by the Department, implement its dissemination
plan; and
3. Enhance and further evaluate the exemplary program during the
project period of the grant award.
Level 2 is recognition as an effective program. An IHE whose
program is designated as effective must:
1. Within 30 days of receiving an award, provide to the Department
a plan to disseminate information about its program to other IHEs;
2. Upon approval by the Department, implement its dissemination
plan; and
3. Enhance and further evaluate the effective program during the
project period of the grant award.
Level 3 is designation as a promising program. An IHE whose program
is recognized as promising must:
1. Within 30 days of receiving an award, submit to the Department a
plan to enhance and further evaluate its program;
2. Upon approval by the Department, implement its enhancement and
evaluation plan; and
3. Within 12 months of award, provide to the Department a report
detailing the results of its evaluation.
Definitions
1. Exemplary program means a program that has a strong theoretical
base and demonstrated effectiveness in reducing alcohol or other drug
abuse among college students or reducing problems resulting from
alcohol or other drug use among college students, using a research
design of the highest quality. For the purpose of this grant
competition, a research design of the highest quality means an
experimental design in which students are randomly assigned to
participate in a project being evaluated (treatment group) or not
participate in the project (control group). The effect of the project
is the difference in outcomes between the treatment and control groups.
If strong, experimentally determined evidence of the effectiveness
of a program already exists, and the program was implemented on the
applicant's campus with fidelity to the research, then a quasi-
experimental evaluation of the program's implementation on the
applicant's campus may be an acceptable research design. For the
purpose of this grant competition, quasi-experimental designs include
several designs that attempt to approximate a random assignment design.
2. Effective program means a program that has a strong theoretical
base and has been evaluated using either an experimental or quasi-
experimental research design, with the evaluation results suggesting
effectiveness in reducing alcohol or other drug abuse among college
students, reducing problems resulting from alcohol or other drug use
among college students, reducing risk factors, enhancing protective
factors, or resulting in some combination of those impacts.
3. Promising program means a program that has a strong theoretical
base and for which evidence has been obtained, using limited research
methods, that the program may reduce alcohol or other drug abuse among
college students, reduce problems resulting from alcohol or other drug
use among college students, reduce risk factors, enhance protective
factors, or result in some combination of those impacts. For the
purpose of this grant competition, limited research methods are methods
that include a pre- and post-treatment measurement of the effects of a
treatment on a single subject or group of single subjects.
Requirements
Eligible Applicants
Only IHEs that offer an associate or baccalaureate degree are
eligible under this program.
Limitations on Eligibility
(a) Exemplary or effective programs. The length of time an IHE is
ineligible for a subsequent award after receiving recognition for an
exemplary or effective program is three years.
(b) Promising programs. Programs recognized as promising may be
eligible for a new award when their current grant is no longer active.
A grant is considered active until the end of the grant's project or
funding period, including any extensions of those periods that extend
the grantee's authority to obligate funds. A project that fails to
achieve exemplary or effective status after a second designation as a
promising program may not reapply for three years after its second
project period is no longer active.
Funding Limits for Applicants
The maximum amount an applicant may receive for a project
recognized as an exemplary or effective program may be no more than
$150,000 plus indirect costs, and a project recognized as a promising
program may receive no more than $100,000 plus indirect costs.
Selection Criteria
1. Significance
(a) The potential contribution of the program to the development
and advancement of theory, knowledge, and practices in the field of
study.
(b) The quality of the applicant's plan to disseminate the program
in ways that will enable others to use the information or strategies,
including evidence of the program's readiness for replication.
2. Project Design
(a) The extent to which the design of the program reflects up-to-
date knowledge from research and effective practices.
(b) The extent to which the plan to enhance the program reflects
up-to-date knowledge from research and effective practices.
(c) The extent to which the goals, objectives, and outcomes to be
achieved by the enhancement to the program are clearly specified and
measurable.
3. Project Evaluation
(a) The extent to which the evaluation data provide evidence of the
effectiveness of the program in reducing alcohol or other drug use, or
both, reducing problems resulting from alcohol or other drug use, or
both, reducing risk factors, enhancing protective factors, or some
combination of those impacts.
(b) The extent to which the methods of evaluation used during the
implementation of the program will provide guidance about effective
strategies suitable for replication or testing in other settings.
(c) The extent to which the methods of evaluation used during the
enhancement of the program will provide performance feedback and permit
periodic assessment of progress toward achieving intended outcomes.
[[Page 17870]]
Executive Order 12866
This notice of final priority, definitions, requirements, and
selection criteria has been reviewed in accordance with Executive Order
12866. Under the terms of the order, we have assessed the potential
costs and benefits of this regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with the notice of final priority,
definitions, requirements, and selection criteria are those resulting
from statutory requirements and those we have determined as necessary
for administering this program effectively and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and benefits--both quantitative
and qualitative--of this notice of final priority, definitions,
requirements, and selection criteria, we have determined that the
benefits of the final priority, definitions, requirements, and
selection criteria justify the costs.
We have also determined that this regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal governments in the exercise of
their governmental functions.
We summarized the costs and benefits in the notice of proposed
priority, definitions, requirements, and selection criteria.
Intergovernmental Review
This program is subject to Executive Order 12372 and the
regulations in 34 CFR part 79. One of the objectives of the Executive
order is to foster an intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened
federalism. The Executive order relies on processes developed by State
and local governments for coordination and review of proposed Federal
financial assistance.
This document provides early notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well as all other Department of
Education documents published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe
Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site:
http://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available
free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S.
Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in
the Washington, DC area at (202) 512-1530.
You may also view this document in text at the following site:
http://www.ed.gov/programs/dvpcollege/applicant.html.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/
nara/.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 84.184N Office of
Safe and Drug-Free Schools--Models of Exemplary, Effective, and
Promising Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Prevention Programs on
College Campuses)
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7131.
Dated: March 26, 2008.
Deborah A. Price,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools.
[FR Doc. E8-6678 Filed 3-31-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P