Office of Clinical and Preventive Services; Elder Care Initiative Long-Term Care Grant Program, 16862-16870 [E8-6409]
Download as PDF
16862
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 62 / Monday, March 31, 2008 / Notices
mmaher on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
protein (acid-HP) and Asian-style
sauces.
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments regarding the CPG at any
time.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
on the CPG to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to: https://
www.regulations.gov.
Submit written requests for single
copies of CPG Sec. 500.500 Guidance
Levels for 3–MCPD (3-chloro-1,2propanediol) in Acid-Hydrolyzed
Protein and Asian-Style Sauces to the
Division of Compliance Policy (HFC–
230), Office of Enforcement, Food and
Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers
Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 240–632–
6860. Send two self-addressed adhesive
labels to assist that office in processing
your request, or fax your request to 240–
632–6861. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Judith L. Kidwell, Office of Food
Additive Safety, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS–265), Food
and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint
Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD,
20740–3835, 301–436–1071.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In the Federal Register of May 23,
2006 (71 FR 29651), FDA announced the
availability of draft CPG Sec. 500.500
Guidance Levels for 3–MCPD (3-chloro1,2-propanediol) in Acid-Hydrolyzed
Protein and Asian-Style Sauces. FDA
received one comment on the draft CPG.
The International Hydrolyzed Protein
Council (IHPC) offered clarification for
the following sentence found in the
BACKGROUND section of the draft
CPG: ‘‘Since 1996, many countries
* * * have recommended or required
that industry take steps to ensure that 3–
MCPD is not detectable in acid-HP or
Asian-style sauces at levels ranging from
0.01 parts per million (ppm) to 1 ppm.’’
IHPC suggested that we revise the
sentence as follows: ‘‘Since 1996, many
countries * * * have recommended or
required that industry take steps to
ensure that 3–MCPD in acid-HP or
Asian-style sauces does not exceed
levels ranging from 0.01 parts per
million (ppm) to 1 ppm.’’ IHPC
explained that using the phrase ‘‘not
detectable’’ and then listing allowable
levels is confusing. We concur with the
comment and have revised the final
CPG accordingly. FDA also revised the
SPECIMEN CHARGES section in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:00 Mar 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
final CPG to provide operational
guidance regarding reference to the
United States Code (U.S.C.) when citing
the violation charged in a domestic
seizure and reference to the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act when
citing the violation charged in an import
detention. We also have made other
editorial changes to the CPG for
clarification.
This CPG is being issued as level 1
guidance consistent with FDA’s good
guidance practices regulations (21 CFR
10.115). The CPG represents the
agency’s current thinking on 3–MCPD in
acid-HP and Asian-style sauces. It does
not create or confer any rights for or on
any person and does not operate to bind
FDA or the public. An alternate
approach may be used if such approach
satisfies the requirements of the
applicable statutes and regulations.
II. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic
comments on the CPG at any time.
Submit a single copy of electronic
comments or two paper copies of any
mailed comments, except that
individuals may submit one paper copy.
Comments are to be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. The CPG and
received comments may be seen in the
Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
Please note that on January 15, 2008,
the FDA Division of Dockets
Management Web site transitioned to
the Federal Dockets Management
System (FDMS). FDMS is a
Government-wide, electronic docket
management system. Electronic
comments or submissions will be
accepted by FDA through FDMS only.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the CPG from the Office of
Regulatory Affairs home page at https://
www.fda.gov/ora under ‘‘Compliance
Reference.’’
Dated: March 14, 2008.
Margaret O’K. Glavin,
Associate Commissioner for Regulatory
Affairs.
[FR Doc. E8–6504 Filed 3–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Indian Health Service
Office of Clinical and Preventive
Services; Elder Care Initiative LongTerm Care Grant Program
Announcement Type: New.
Funding Announcement Number:
HHS–2008–IHS–EHC–0001.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers: 93.933.
Key Dates:
Letter of Intent Deadline: May 2, 2008.
Application Deadline Date: June 20,
2008.
Review Date: July 21–August 1, 2008.
Earliest Anticipated Start Date:
September 1, 2008.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
The Indian Health Service (IHS)
announces the availability of up to
$600,000 for competitive grants through
the Elder Care Initiative Long Term Care
(ECILTC) Grant Program to support
planning and implementation of
sustainable long-term care services for
American Indians and Alaska Native
(AI/AN) elders. This program is
authorized under the Snyder Act, Indian
Health Care Improvement Act, as
amended, 25 U.S.C. 1653(c), and Public
Health Service Act, Section 301, as
amended. This program is described at
93.933 in the Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance (CFDA).
The AI/AN elder population is
growing rapidly and the Al/AN
population as a whole is aging. The
prevalence of chronic disease in this
population continues to increase,
contributing to a frail elder population
with increasing long-term care (LTC)
needs.
LTC is best understood as an array of
social and health care services that
support an individual who has needs for
assistance in activities of daily living
over a prolonged period. LTC supports
elders and their families with medical,
personal, and social services delivered
in a variety of settings to support quality
of life, maximum function, and dignity.
While families continue to be the
backbone of LTC for Al/AN elders, there
is well documented need to support this
care with formal services. The way these
services and systems of care are
developed and implemented can have a
profound impact on the cultural and
spiritual health of the community.
Home and community-based services
have the potential for meeting the needs
of the vast majority of elders requiring
LTC services, supporting the key roles
of the family in the care of the elder and
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
mmaher on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 62 / Monday, March 31, 2008 / Notices
the elder in the care of the family and
community. A LTC system with a
foundation in HCBS will also comply
with the United States Supreme Court
interpretation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act in Olmstead v. L.C., 527
U.S. 581 (1999). The 28 CFR 35.130(d)
ruling obligates States and localities to
provide care for persons with disability
‘‘in the most integrated setting
appropriate to the needs of qualified
individuals with disabilities.’’ An
efficient and effective LTC system
would make use of all available
resources, integrating and coordinating
services to assist families in the care of
their elders.
The primary focus for planning and
program development for AI/AN LTC is
at the Tribal and urban community
level. Tribes and communities have very
different histories, capabilities, and
resources with regard to LTC program
development. Each Tribe or community
will have different priorities in building
LTC infrastructure. It is critical that the
development of LTC services be well
grounded in an assessment of need
based on population demographics and
rates of functional impairment. LTC
services should be acceptable to elders
and their families and consistent with
community values in their
implementation. The services should be
a part of an overall vision and plan for
a LTC system to support elders and their
families.
There are a number of elements
(Tribal sovereignty and the governmentto government relationship, the unique
funding structure of Indian health, and
the importance of the cultural context)
that distinguish AI/AN LTC. Tribes and
AL/AN organizations have found it
useful to look both inside and outside
of the Indian Health system (IHS, Tribal,
and urban Indian health programs) for
LTC strategies and models.
The planning and design of LTC
services must identify the revenue
source(s) that will support the delivery
of care. Finding resources for LTC
services presents a formidable
challenge. Funds appropriated through
the IHS (whether direct service or
Tribal) can provide healthcare services
which are part of a LTC system, but do
not provide for a comprehensive set of
LTC services and cannot support
housing or social services of a nonmedical nature. Programs funded
through the Administration on Aging
American Indian, Alaska Native and
Native Hawaiian Program (e.g. Title VI
A and Title VI C Family Caregiver
Support Program) have been key
elements in the LTC infrastructure in
AI/AN communities. Additional Older
American Act resources may be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:00 Mar 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
available through State Units on Aging
and Area Agencies on Aging. Other
resources are available to provide LTC
services on a reimbursable basis for
eligible AI/AN elders. The majority of
formal LTC services in this country are
funded by reimbursements from state
Medicaid and HCBS programs. The
Veterans Administration may be a
source of reimbursement for LTC
services for eligible AI/AN veterans.
Federal housing programs are a
potential resource in developing the
housing component of the LTC
infrastructure. Each of these resources
has unique eligibility requirements.
Development of reimbursement-based
LTC services often requires an ongoing
investment of funds to support delivery
of services during the initial period of
client recruitment, start-up of services,
and the receipt of reimbursement for
those services.
This grant program is designed to
provide support for the development of
AI/AN LTC, with funding for either
assessment and planning, or program
implementation. LTC services
developed with support of this grant
program must be those which the IIHS
has the authority to provide, either
directly or through funding agreement,
and must be designed to serve IRS
beneficiaries. Most Tribes and urban
communities are building toward their
ideal LTC system incrementally, adding
new or integrating existing services over
time. The goal of this grant program is
to support Tribes, Tribal Organizations,
Tribal consortia, and Urban Indian
health programs as they build LTC
systems and services that meet the
needs of their elders and that keep
elders engaged and involved in the lives
of their families and communities.
II. Award Information
Type of Awards: Grant.
Estimated Funds Available: The total
amount identified for fiscal year (FY)
2008 is up to $600,000. The project
period for the grants is 24 months in
duration and each budget period is
approximately 12 months. The award
amounts are set at $50,000–$75,000
each year, depending on the project
category. Continuation awards are
subject to the availability of funds and
satisfactory performance.
Anticipated Number of Awards: 8–10
awards will be made under this program
announcement.
Project Period: Two Years (24
months).
Award Amount:
$50,000 per year for Category 1—
Assessment and Planning Awards.
$75,000 per year for Category 2—
Implementation Awards.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16863
Category 1—Assessment and
Planning awards will support the
following activities:
a. Demographic assessment of the
population and assessment of LTC
needs on a population basis.
b. Evaluation of existing services and
resources for LTC.
c. Evaluation of potential resources to
fund LTC services.
d. Assessment of cultural and
religious values regarding care of the
elder for the population(s) served.
e. Assessment of elder preferences for
type, structure, and setting of services.
f. Establishment of a comprehensive
vision for LTC services with priorities
for implementation.
g. Identification of potential funding
sources for program development and
for ongoing financing of service
delivery.
h. The integration and incorporation
of the above elements into a report or
other document that guides LTC
services/system implementation,
including a plan for sustainability.
Category 2—Implementation awards
will support the following activities:
Implementation of a service or group of
services that add capacity to the LTC
system of the applicant’s Tribe or
organization. The implementation plan
should be based on a comprehensive
assessment and plan, including a
business plan, The services should be
designed to be self-sustaining at the end
of the project period.
Applications must be for only one
Project Type. Applications that address
more than one Project Type will be
considered ineligible and will be
returned to the applicant. The
maximum funding level includes both
direct and indirect costs. Applications
with budgets which exceed the
maximum funding level or project
period identified for a Project Type will
not be reviewed.
III. Eligibility Information
1. The AI/AN applicant must be one
of the following:
A. A Federally-recognized Indian
Tribe; or
B. Tribal organization as defined by
25 U.S.C. 1603(e); or
C. Urban Indian organization as
defined by 25 U.S.C. 1603(h); or
D. A consortium of eligible Tribes,
Tribal organization or urban Indian
health programs authorized by
governing bodies to apply for and
receive awards on their behalf under
this program announcement.
Applicants must provide proof of
non-profit status with the application.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching—The
ECILTC Grant Program does not require
matching funds or cost sharing.
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
mmaher on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
16864
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 62 / Monday, March 31, 2008 / Notices
3. Other Requirements:
A. A Letter of Intent (LOI) to apply is
required and must be postmarked no
later than May 2, 2008. The LOI is a
mandatory but non-binding request for
information that will assist in planning
both the review and post award phase.
There is no penalty for submitting a LOI
and not proceeding with the grant
application but a grant will not be
reviewed if a LOI was not submitted.
See Section IV.6.a for detailed
instructions for submission of the LOI.
B. The following documentation (as
applicable) is required for an
application to be considered complete:
1. Tribal Resolution—A resolution of
the Indian Tribe served by the project
must accompany the application
submission. An Indian Tribe that is
proposing a project affecting another
Indian Tribe must include resolutions
from all affected Tribes to be served.
Applications by Tribal organizations
will not require a specific Tribal
resolution if the current Tribal
resolution(s) under which they operate
would encompass the proposed grant
activities. Draft resolutions are
acceptable in lieu of an official
resolution. However, an official signed
Tribal resolution must be received by
the Division of Grants Operations (DGO)
prior to the beginning of the Objective
Review, July 21, 2008. If an official
signed resolution is not received by July
21, 2008, the application will be
considered incomplete, ineligible for
review, and returned to the applicant
without consideration. Applicants
submitting additional documentation
after the initial application submission
are required to ensure the information
was received by the IBS by obtaining
documentation confirming delivery (i.e.
FedEx tracking, postal return receipt,
etc.).
2. Tribal Consortium—If a consortium
is submitting an application it must:
• Identify each of the consortium
member Tribes.
• Identify if any of the member Tribes
intend to submit a LTC grant
application of their own.
• Demonstrate that Tribes, Tribal
organizations, urban Indian health
programs, or Tribal consortia’s
application does not duplicate or
overlap any objectives of the other
consortium members who may be
submitting their own LTC grant
application.
Any application received from a
Consortium that does not meet the
requirements above will be considered
ineligible for review.
• Tribes, Tribal organizations, urban
Indian health programs, or Tribal
consortia’s receiving Category I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:00 Mar 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
(Assessment and Planning funding) in
the FY2006–2007 [ITIS Elder Care
Initiative grant cycle will be considered
ineligible for FY2008 Category I
(Assessment and Planning) funding
unless they can demonstrate that the
current application serves a different
population than the FY2006–2007 grant.
(e.g. a consortium may target different
Tribes).
• Tribes, Tribal organizations, urban
Indian health programs, or Tribal
consortias receiving Category II
(Implementation) grants in the FY2006–
2007 IHS Elder Health Care Initiative
Grants cycle will be considered
ineligible for FY2008 Category II
(Implementation) funding unless they
can demonstrate that they will be
implementing an entirely new service or
program (e.g. an applicant with current
funding to implement an Adult Day
Health Program may now apply for
funding to implement a personal care
program).
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Applicant package may be found in
Grants.gov (www.grants.gov) or at:
https://www.ihs.gov/
NonMedicalPrograms/gogp/
gogp_funding.asp. Information
regarding the electronic application
process may be directed to Michelle G.
Bulls, at (301) 443–6290.
Information regarding the Letter of
Intent may be obtained from: Ms.
Orlinda Platero, Office Clinical and
Preventive Services, Indian Health
Service, 801 Thompson Avenue, Suite
220, Rockville, Maryland 20852, (301)
443–2522, Fax: 301–594–6213.
The entire application package along
with downloadable application
instructions is available at: https://
www.grants.gov. Details regarding the
ECILTC Grant Program are available at:
https://www.ihs.gov/MedicalPrograms/
ElderCare/. Detailed application
instructions for this announcement are
downloadable on Grants.gov.
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission:
• Be single spaced.
• Be typewritten.
• Have consecutively numbered
pages.
• Use black type not smaller than 12
characters per one inch.
• Contain a narrative that does not
exceed ten-typed pages. See Section V
for instructions for the content of the
narrative. The ten page narrative does
not include the detailed work plan with
timeline, standard forms, Tribal
resolutions or letters of support (if
necessary), table of contents, budget,
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
budget justifications, budget narrative,
and/or other appendix items.
Public Policy Requirements: All
Federal-wide public policies apply to
IRS grants with the exception of the
discrimination public policy.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications must be submitted
electronically through Grants.gov by
12:00 midnight Eastern Standard Time
(EST). If technical challenges arise and
the applicant is unable to successfully
complete the electronic application
process, the applicant should contact
Grants Policy Staff (UPS) at (301) 443–
6290 at least fifteen days prior to the
application deadline and advise of the
difficulties that your organization is
experiencing. The grantee must obtain
prior approval, in writing (e-mails are
acceptable) allowing the paper
submission. If submission of a paper
application is requested and approved,
the original and two copies may be sent
to the appropriate grants contact that is
listed in Section P1.2., above.
Applications not submitted through
Grants.gov, without an approved
waiver, may be returned to the applicant
without review or consideration. Late
applications will not be accepted for
processing, will be returned to the
applicant, and will not be considered
for funding.
4. Intergovernmental Review:
Executive Order 12372 requiring
intergovernmental review is not
applicable to this program.
5. Funding Restrictions:
• Pre-award costs are allowable
pending prior approval from the
awarding agency. However, in
accordance with 45 CFR Part 74, all preaward costs are incurred at the
recipient’s risk. The awarding office is
under no obligation to reimburse such
costs if for any reason the applicant
does not receive an award or if the
award to the recipient is less than
anticipated.
• The available funds are inclusive of
direct and appropriate indirect costs.
• Only one grant will be awarded per
applicant.
• IHS will not acknowledge receipt of
applications.
6. Other Submission Requirements:
• If the applicant is unable to submit
via Grants.gov and obtains a waiver
from the standard application
requirements, please use the following
forms: SF–424, 424A, 424B, and
certification forms, as appropriate. One
original and two copies must be
submitted to: attn: Norma Jean Dunne;
Division of Grants Operations; 801
Thompson Avenue, Rockville, MD
20852. Copies of the forms may be
found at: https://www.ihs.gov/
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
mmaher on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 62 / Monday, March 31, 2008 / Notices
NonMedicalPrograms/gogp/
index.cfm?module=forms. Applications
are due by June 20, 2008.
• A LOI to apply is required and must
be postmarked no later than May 2,
2008. The LOI is a mandatory but nonbinding request for information that will
assist in planning both the review and
post award phase. There is no penalty
for submitting a LOI and not proceeding
with the grant application, but a grant
will not be reviewed if a LOI was not
submitted. Applicants will be notified
by fax or e-mail that their LOI has been
received, as it is received.
The LOI should be sent to Ms. Orlinda
Platero at the following address: Ms.
Orlinda Platero, Office Clinical and
Preventive Services, Indian Health
Service, 801 Thompson Avenue, Suite
326, Rockville, Maryland 20852,
Telephone: (301) 443–2522, Fax: (301)
594–6213, E-mail:
Orlinda.Platero@ihs.gov.
The LOI must contain:
• The name of the applying
organization.
• The individual who is responsible
for correspondence regarding the
application, and contact information for
that individual. Please indicate whether
fax or e-mail notification of receipt of
LOl is preferred, and provide e-mail
address and/or fax number.
• The name of all member Tribes if
the applicant is a Tribal Consortium and
those Tribes involved in the proposal.
• Whether the intent is to apply for a
Category I or Category II grant.
Electronic Submission—The preferred
method for receipt of applications is
electronic submission through
Grants.gov. However, should any
technical challenges arise regarding the
submission, please contact Grants.gov
Customer Support at 1–800–518–4726
or support@grants.gov. The Contact
Center hours of operation are Monday–
Friday from 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. EST. The
applicant must seek assistance at least
fifteen days prior to the application
deadline. Applicants that don’t adhere
to the timelines for Central Contractor
Registry (CCR) and/or Grants.gov
registration and/or requesting timely
assistance with technical issues will not
be a candidate for paper applications.
To submit an application
electronically, please use https://
www.Grants.gov and select the ‘‘Apply
for Grants’’ link on the home page.
Download a copy of the application
package on the Grants.gov Web site,
complete it offline and then upload and
submit the application via the
Grants.gov site. You may not e-mail an
electronic copy of a grant application to
IHS.
Please be reminded of the following:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:00 Mar 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
• Under the new IHS application
submission requirements, paper
applications are not the preferred
method. However, if you have technical
problems submitting your application
on-line, please contact directly
Grants.gov Customer Support at: https://
www.grants.gov/CustomerSupport.
• Upon contacting Grants.gov, obtain
a tracking number as proof of contact.
The tracking number is helpful if there
are technical issues that cannot be
resolved and a waiver request from GPS
must be obtained.
• If it is determined that a formal
waiver is necessary, the applicant must
submit a request, in writing (emails are
acceptable), to Michelle.Bulls@ihs.gov
that includes a justification for the need
to deviate from the standard electronic
submission process. Upon receipt of
approval, a hard-copy application
package must be downloaded by the
applicant from: https://www.ihs.gov/
NonMedicalPrograms/gogp/
index.cfm?rnodule=forms. Please use
the following forms for the standard
application requirements: SF–424,
424A, 424B, and certification forms, as
appropriate. One original and two
copies must be submitted to: Attn:
Norma Jean Dunne; Division of Grants
Operations; 801 Thompson Avenue,
TMP 360, Rockville, MD 20852 by the
application due date of June 20, 2008.
• Upon entering the Grants.gov site,
there is information available that
outlines the requirements to the
applicant regarding electronic
submission of an application through
Grants.gov, as well as the hours of
operation. We strongly encourage all
applicants not to wait until the deadline
date to begin the application process
through Grants.gov as the registration
process for CCR and Grants.gov could
take up to fifteen working days.
• To use Grants.gov, you, as the
applicant, must have a Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number and
register in the CCR. You should allow a
minimum often days working days to
complete CCR registration. See below on
how to apply.
• You must submit all documents
electronically, including all information
typically included on the SF–424 and
all necessary assurances and
certifications.
• Please use the optional attachment
feature in Grants.gov to attach
additional documentation that may be
requested by IHS.
• Your application must comply with
any page limitation requirements
described in the program
announcement.
• After you electronically submit
your application, you will receive an
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16865
automatic acknowledgment from
Grants.gov that contains a Grants.gov
tracking number. The IRS, DGO will
download your application from
Grants.gov and provide necessary copies
to the cognizant program office. DGO
will not notify applicants that the
application has been received.
• You may access the electronic
application for this program on https://
www.Grants.gov.
• You may search for the
downloadable application package
either by the CFDA number or the
Funding Opportunity Number. Both
numbers are identified in the heading of
this announcement.
• The applicant must provide the
Funding Opportunity Number: HHS–
2008–IHS–EHC–0001. E-mail
applications will not be accepted under
this announcement.
DUNS Number
Applicants are required to have a
DUNS number to apply for a grant or
cooperative agreement from the Federal
Government. The DUNS number is a
nine-digit identification number, which
uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and
there is no charge. To obtain a DUNS
number, access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. Interested parties may
wish to obtain their DUNS number by
phone to expedite the process.
Applications submitted electronically
must also be registered with the CCR. A
DUNS number is required before CCR
registration can be completed. Many
organizations may already have a DUNS
number. Please use the number listed
above to investigate whether or not your
organization has a DUNS number.
Registration with the CCR is free of
charge.
Applicants may register by calling 1–
888–227–2423. Please review and
complete the CCR Registration
Worksheet located on https://
www.grants.gov/CCRRegister.
More detailed information regarding
these registration processes can be
found at https://www.grants.gov.
V. Application Review Information
Note: Only those programs or services
which the IHS is authorized to provide,
either directly or through funding agreement,
can be supported by this grant program.
UNLESS CONGRESS PROVIDES
OTHERWISE, those services which are
primarily housing or custodial in nature are
not eligible for support (e.g. assisted living
facility, board and care, or nursing home
which is primarily custodial in nature).
Supportive services delivered in those
facilities, with the intent to promote the
health and wellness of elders, are eligible for
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
16866
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 62 / Monday, March 31, 2008 / Notices
funding. Programs and services developed
with support of this grant program must be
designed for the benefit of IHS beneficiaries.
The instructions for preparing the
application narrative also constitute the
evaluation criteria for reviewing and
scoring the application. Weights
assigned to each section are noted in
parentheses. The narrative should
include only the first year of activities;
information for multi-year projects
should be included as an appendix. See
‘‘Multi-year Project Requirements’’ at
the end of this section for more
information. The narrative section
should be written in a manner that is
clear to outside reviewers unfamiliar
with prior related activities of the
applicant. It should be well organized,
succinct, and contain all information
necessary for reviewers to understand
the project fully.
1. Criteria
mmaher on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
A. Category I (Assessment and Planning)
1. Introduction and Need for Assistance
(35 Points)
Provide an understanding of the LTC
needs of the elderly in the Tribe or
service area and identify the additional
information needed for planning. The
number of elders that will be affected by
the program will be considered a factor
in the review as will the relationship of
the amount of funding requested to the
number of elders to be served. The
applicant should use the best data
available, understanding that, for most
programs, many of these data elements
will not be available or be poor in
quality and that improved data for
future planning will be an outcome of
this grant-funded project. Data that is
not available should be noted as such
and addressed in the work plan (Section
2). Identify all information sources.
a. Currently available information for
use in planning and service
development:
i. Currently available information
regarding population and need for
services.
1. Demographics of the population
and assessment of LTC needs on a
population basis.
2. Geographic and social factors,
including availability of caregivers.
3. Cultural and religious values
regarding care of the elder for the
population(s) to be served.
4. Elder preferences for type,
structure, and setting of services.
ii. Currently available information
regarding existing services and
resources for LTC:
1. Availability and organization of
existing aging and LTC services,
including services available to Tribal or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:00 Mar 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
community members provided by nonTribal/non-AI/AN organization
programs.
2. Availability and organization of
health services for the elderly, including
Native healing systems.
3. Assessment of the capacity of
available LTC services to support care
provided ‘‘in the most integrated setting
appropriate to the needs of qualified
individuals with disabilities’’ (Olmstead
v. L.C).
4. Assessment of caregiver workforce.
iii. Funding streams currently paying
for LTC services.
iv. Current collaborations in program
development or service delivery.
b. Current vision for LTC system/
services and priorities for development.
c. Elder care assessment and planning
activities within the past ten years:
i. Funding sources.
ii. Dates of funding.
iii. Summary of project
accomplishments.
iv. Relationship to the current
proposal. Copies of reports will not be
accepted.
d. Unmet need for LTC services.
e. Information needed for planning
and service implementation which is
not currently available.
2. Work Plan (35 Points)
This section should demonstrate the
soundness and effectiveness of the
applicant’s proposal. The work plan
should be designed to produce as an
end product the readiness to develop
LTC service(s) and should include all
information not already available. For
an example of the information needed to
demonstrate readiness to develop LTC
service(s), see Section 1 Introduction
and Need for Assistance in the Category
II Implementation criteria.
Note that attendance and presentation
at the AI/AN Long Term Care
Conference and participation in
periodic grantee teleconferences are a
requirement of the grant and should be
included as activities in the work plan.
a. State the proposed assessment or
planning process.
b. List the objectives clearly.
i. Identify the data elements needed.
ii. Indicate the function of each data
element in the plan.
c. Describe the approach to the
project.
i. Tasks.
ii. Resources needed to implement
and complete the project.
iii. Timeline.
iv. Specialized technical resources for
data collection or analysis.
v. Training needs.
• Include in work plan attendance
and presentation at the annual AI/AN
Long Term Care Conference.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
d. Identify the final product of the
assessment/plan and the strategy for
dissemination.
e. Submit a work plan in the appendix
which includes the following
information:
i. Action steps on a time line for
implementation of the work plan.
ii. Identify who will perform the
action steps.
iii. Identify who will supervise the
action steps.
iv. Identify who will accept and/or
approve work products at the end of the
proposed project.
v. Include any additional training that
will take place during the proposed
project, who will conduct the training,
and who will be attending the training.
vi. Include the following information
if consultants or contractors will be
used during the proposed project, their
position description and scope of work
(or note if consultants/contractors will
not be used):
• Educational requirements.
• Desired qualifications and work
experience.
• Expected work products.
• Contractor’s supervisor.
• Include a resume and letter of
commitment in the appendix for
potential consultant/contractor.
3. Project Evaluation (10 Points)
This section should show how
progress on this project will be assessed
and how the success of this project will
be judged.
a. Describe and list outcomes by
which this project will be evaluated.
Each proposed project objective and
task of the work plan should be
evaluated and the evaluation activities
should appear on the work plan.
b. Identify the responsible person for
the evaluation (need not be an outside
evaluator).
4. Organizational Capabilities and
Qualifications (10 Points)
This section outlines the broader
capacity of the Tribe, Tribal
organization, or urban health program to
complete the project outlined in the
work plan. It includes the identification
of personnel responsible for completing
tasks and chain of responsibility for
successful completion of the project
outlined in the work plan.
a. Describe the organizational
structure of the Tribe/Tribal
organization beyond health care
activities.
b. Describe the ability of the
organization to manage the proposed
project. Include information regarding
similarly sized projects in scope and
financial assistance as well as other
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 62 / Monday, March 31, 2008 / Notices
mmaher on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
grants and projects successfully
completed.
c. Describe what equipment (i.e., fax
machine, phone, computer, etc.) and
facility space (i.e., office space) will be
available for use during the proposed
project. Include information about any
equipment not currently available that
will be purchased through the grant.
d. List key personnel who will work
on the project.
i. Identify existing personnel and new
program staff to be hired.
ii. Include in the appendix, position
descriptions and resumes for all key
personnel. Position descriptions should
clearly describe each position and
duties, indicating desired qualifications
experience, requirements related to the
proposed project and how they will be
supervised. Resumes must indicate that
the proposed staff member is qualified
to carry out the proposed project
activities and who will determine if the
work of a contractor is acceptable.
iii. Note who will be writing the
progress reports.
iv. Indicate if a position is to be filled
for a proposed position description.
v. Note and address how additional
personnel beyond those covered by the
grant funds, (i.e., IT support, volunteers,
interviewers, etc.), will be filled and if
funds are required, list the funding
source.
vi. Indicate the percentage of time to
be allocated to this project and identify
the resources used to fund the
remainder of the individual’s salary if
personnel are to be only partially
funded by this grant.
5. Categorical Budget and Budget
Justification (10 Points)
This section should provide a clear
estimate of the project program costs
and justification for expenses for the
entire grant period. The budget and
budget justification should be consistent
with the tasks identified in the work
plan.
a. Categorical budget (Form SF 424A,
Budget Information Non Construction
Programs) completing each of the
budget periods requested.
b. Include a narrative justification for
all costs, explaining why each line item
is necessary or relevant to the proposed
project. Include sufficient details to
facilitate the determination of cost
allowability.
c. Indicate any special start-up costs.
d. Include a brief program narrative
budget justification for the second year.
e. If indirect costs are claimed,
indicate and apply the current
negotiated rate to the budget. Include a
copy of the rate agreement in the
appendix.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:00 Mar 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
B. Category II (Program Implementation)
1. Introduction and Need for Assistance
(35 points)
Provide an understanding of current
need for and availability of LTC services
for the elderly in the Tribe or service
area. Identify the number of elders to be
served. The number of elders that will
be affected by the program will be
considered a factor in the review as will
the relationship of the amount of
funding requested to the number of
elders to be served. Demonstrate the
necessary assessment and planning to
successfully implement new service(s)
and show that the services fit within a
comprehensive vision or plan for elder
care. If significant elements listed below
are not available, programs should
consider applying for Category I funding
to support the assessment and planning
activities necessary for successful
program development.
a. Demographic assessment of the
population and assessment of LTC
needs on a population basis.
i. Population distribution. Number of
elderly of different age and gender
groups in the population.
ii. Rates of functional impairment and
numbers of elders with need for
assistance in activities in daily living
with adequate detail to project need for
services.
b. Geographic and social factors that
affect access to services and availability
of caregivers.
i. Rural vs. urban; population density.
ii. Family structure and organization.
c. Assessment of cultural and religious
values regarding care of the elder for the
population(s) to be served.
d. Assessment of elder preferences for
type, structure, and setting of services.
e. Evaluation of existing services and
resources for LTC.
i. Availability and organization of
existing aging and LTC services. Include
services available to Tribal or
community members provided by
programs or organizations that are not
Tribal or AI/AN organizations.
ii. Availability and organization of
health services for the elderly, including
Native healing systems.
iii. Capacity of existing LTC services
to support care provided ‘‘in the most
integrated setting appropriate to the
needs of qualified individuals with
disabilities’’ (Olmstead v. L.C).
f. Assessment of caregiver workforce.
i. Availability of potential caregivers
(formal and informal).
ii. Training resources for formal and
informal caregivers.
g. Identification of potential resources
for new LTC service.
i. Funding for program development.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16867
ii. Funding for ongoing service
delivery.
iii. Potential partners in program
development.
h. Relevant Federal, 11-IS, Tribal and/
or State standards, laws and regulations
and codes and relevant licensure or
certification requirements.
i. A comprehensive vision or plan for
LTC systems/services which
incorporates the information above and
identifies priorities for implementation.
j. Unmet need for LTC services.
2. Work Plan (35 points)
This section should demonstrate the
soundness and effectiveness of the
applicant’s proposal. This includes both
the work plan for program
implementation and the underlying
plan or strategy for sustainability of the
service(s) past the point of grant
support. Note that attendance and
presentation at the AI/AN LTC
Conference and participation in
periodic grantee teleconferences are a
requirement of the grant and should be
included as activities in the work plan.
a. Identify the LTC service(s) to be
implemented and:
i. Show how it is consistent with the
results of the assessment/planning
process described above (Introduction
and Need for Assistance).
ii. Integrates with existing LTC and
health services.
b. Summarize the business plan or
plan for self-sufficiency and
sustainability, including:
i. Funding stream(s) to support
ongoing services.
ii. Clearly indicate whether the
program will be self-supporting (and if
so, when) or not. If not self-supporting,
what will be the source of additional
revenue for services?
iii. Timeline with projections for
client recruitment, expected revenue
and shortfalls, resources for funds
needed to bridge between onset of
services and collection of
reimbursement, etc.
iv. Licensure or certification
requirements.
v. Indicate if Tribal revenue is
expected to pay in part or in whole for
services. A letter from the Tribal
Council or administration indicating
that these funds have been budgeted for
this purpose should be included in the
appendix.
c. Describe the approach to
implementation.
i. Tasks.
ii. Resources needed to implement
and complete the project.
iii. Timeline for implementation.
iv. Specialized technical resources.
v. Training needs.
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
16868
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 62 / Monday, March 31, 2008 / Notices
mmaher on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
• Include in work plan attendance
and presentation at the annual AI/AN
Long Term Care Conference.
vi. Consultation needs (if any).
d. Include a detailed work plan in the
appendix, containing the following
information:
i. Action steps on a time line for
implementation of the work plan.
ii. Identify who will perform the
action steps.
iii. Identify who will supervise the
action steps.
iv. Identify who will accept and/or
approve work products at the end of the
proposed project.
v. Include any additional training that
will take place during the proposed
project,
vi. Include the following information
if consultants or contractors will be
used during the proposed project, their
position description and scope of work
(or note if consultants/contractors will
not be used):
• Educational requirements.
• Desired qualifications and work
experience.
• Expected work products.
• Contractor’s supervisor.
• Include a resume and letter of
commitment in the appendix for
potential consultant/contractor.
e. Include a detailed business plan in
the appendix, containing the following
information:
i. Timeline with detailed expense and
revenue projections.
ii. Timeline with client recruitment
projections.
iii. Timeline with licensure or
certification requirements and tasks.
iv. Identification of shortfall funding
during implementation with
documentation of the availability of
budgeted funds to support the program
until it is self-sustaining (if applicable).
3. Project Evaluation (10 Points)
This section should show how
progress on this project will be assessed
and how the success of this project will
be judged.
a. Specifically list and describe the
outcomes by which this project will be
evaluated.
b. Identify the evaluator and/or the
individual with responsibility for the
evaluation (need not be an outside
evaluator).
c. Each proposed project objective and
task of the work plan should be able to
be evaluated and the evaluation
activities should appear on the work
plan.
4. Organizational Capabilities and
Qualifications (10 Points)
This section outlines the broader
capacity of the Tribe, Tribal
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:00 Mar 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
organization, or urban health program to
complete the project outlined in the
work plan. This includes the
identification of personnel responsible
for completing tasks and chain of
responsibility for successful completion
of the project outlined in the work plan.
a. Describe the organizational structure
of the Tribe/Tribal organization beyond
health care activities.
b. If management systems are already
in place, simply note it.
c. Describe the ability of the
organization to manage the proposed
project. Include information regarding
similarly sized projects in scope and
financial assistance as well as other
grants and projects successfully
completed.
d. Describe what equipment (i.e., fax
machine, phone, computer, etc.) and
facility space (i.e., office space) will be
available for use during the proposed
project. Include information about any
equipment not currently available that
will be purchased through the grant.
e. List key personnel who will work
on the project.
i. Identify existing personnel and new
program staff to be hired.
ii. Include position descriptions and
resumes for all key personnel in the
appendix. Position descriptions should
clearly describe each position and
duties, indicating desired qualifications
experience, requirements related to the
proposed project and how they will be
supervised. Resumes must indicate that
the proposed staff member is qualified
to carry out the proposed project
activities and who will determine if the
work of a contractor is acceptable.
iii. Note who will be writing the
progress reports.
iv. Indicate if a position is to be filled
for a proposed position description.
v. Note and address how additional
personnel beyond those covered by the
grant funds, (i.e., IT support, volunteers,
interviewers, etc.), will be filled and if
funds are required, list the funding
source.
vi. Indicate the percentage of time to
be allocated to this project and identify
the resources used to fund the
remainder of the individual’s salary if
personnel are to be only partially
funded by this grant.
5. Categorical Budget and Budget
Justification (10 Points)
This section should provide a clear
estimate of the project program costs
and justification for expenses for the
entire grant period. The budget and
budget justification should be consistent
with the tasks identified in the work
plan.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
a. Categorical budget (Form SF 424A,
Budget Information Non-Construction
Programs) completing each of the
budget periods requested.
b. Include a narrative justification for
all costs, explaining why each line item
is necessary or relevant to the proposed
project. Include sufficient details to
facilitate the determination of cost
allowability.
c. Indicate any special start-up costs.
d. Include a brief program narrative
budget justification for the second year.
e. Indicate and apply the current
negotiated rate to the budget if indirect
costs are claimed. Include a copy of the
rate agreement in the appendix.
2. Review and Selection Process
In addition to the above criteria/
requirements, applications are
considered according to the following:
a. Letter of Intent Submission
(Deadline: May 2, 2008); and
b. Application Submission
(Application Deadline: June 20, 2006).
Applications submitted in advance of or
by deadline and verified by the
postmark will undergo a preliminary
review to determine that:
• The applicant and proposed project
type is eligible in accordance with this
grant announcement.
• The application is not a duplication
of a previously funded project.
• The application narrative, forms,
and materials submitted meet the
requirements of the announcement
allowing the review panel to undertake
an in-depth evaluation; otherwise, it
may be returned.
c. Competitive Review of Eligible
Applications (Objective Review: July
21–August 1, 2008).
Applications meeting eligibility
requirements that are complete,
responsive, and conform to this program
announcement will be reviewed for
merit by the Ad Hoc Objective Review
Committee (ORC) appointed by the IHS
to review and make recommendations
on these applications. The review will
be conducted in accordance with the
IHS Objective Review Guidelines. The
technical review process ensures
selection of quality projects in a
national competition for limited
funding. Applications will be evaluated
and rated on the basis of the evaluation
criteria listed in Section V.1. and V.2.
The criteria are used to evaluate the
quality of a proposed project, determine
the likelihood of success, and assign a
numerical score to each application.
The scoring of approved applications
will assist the IHS in determining which
proposals will be funded if the amount
of funding is not sufficient to support all
approved applications. Applications
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 62 / Monday, March 31, 2008 / Notices
recommended for approval, having a
score of 60 or above by the ORC and
scored high enough to be considered for
funding, are ranked. Additional
considerations in final ranking include:
geographic diversity among funded
programs, diversity in population size
among Tribes and communities served
by funded programs, and unique
features with regard to type of program
planned or population served.
Applications scoring below 60 points
will be disapproved and returned to the
applicant. Applications that are
approved but not funded will not be
carried over into the next cycle for
funding consideration.
3. Anticipated Announcement and
Award Dates
Anticipated Award Notification:
August 18, 2008.
Anticipated Award Start Date:
September 1, 2008.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices
The Notice of Award (NoA) will be
initiated by DGO and will be mailed via
postal mail to each entity that is
approved for funding under this
announcement. The NoA will be signed
by the Grants Management Officer, and
this is the authorizing document for
which funds are dispersed to the
approved entities. The NoA will serve
as the official notification of the grant
award and will reflect the amount of
Federal funds awarded, the purpose of
the grant, the terms and conditions of
the award, the effective date of the
award, and the budget/project period.
The NoA is the legally binding
document. Applicants who are
approved but unfunded or disapproved
based on their Objective Review score
will receive a copy of the Executive
Summary which identifies the
weaknesses and strengths of the
application submitted.
mmaher on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
2. Administrative Requirements
Grants are administrated in
accordance with the following
documents:
• This Program Announcement.
• Administrative Requirements: 45
CFR Part 92, ‘‘Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements to State, Local
and Tribal Governments,’’ or 45 CFR
Part 74, ‘‘Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Awards to Institutions
of Higher Education, Hospitals, Other
Non-Profit Organizations, and
Commercial Organizations.’’
• Grants Policy Guidance: HHS
Grants Policy Statement, January 2007.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:00 Mar 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
• Cost Principles: OMB Circular A–
87, ‘‘State, Local, and Indian’’ (Title 2
Part 225).
• Cost Principles: OMB Circular A–
122, ‘‘Non-profit Organizations’’ (Title 2
Part 230).
• Audit Requirements: OMB Circular
A–133, ‘‘Audits of States, Local
Governments, and Non-profit
Organizations.’’
3. Indirect Costs: This section applies
to all grant recipients that request
reimbursement of indirect costs in their
grant application. In accordance with
HHS Grants Policy Statement, Part 11–
27, IHS requires applicants to have a
current indirect cost rate agreement in
place prior to award. The rate agreement
must be prepared in accordance with
the applicable cost principles and
guidance as provided by the cognizant
agency or office. A current rate means
the rate covering the applicable
activities and the award budget period.
If the current rate is not on file with the
DGO at the time of award, the indirect
cost portion of the budget will be
restricted and not available to the
recipient until the current rate is
provided to the DGO.
Generally, indirect costs rates for IFIS
grantees are negotiated with the
Division of Cost Allocation (DCA)
https://rates.psc.gov/ and the Department
of Interior (National Business Center)
https://www.nbc.gov/acquisition/ics/
icshome.html. If your organization has
questions regarding the indirect cost
policy, please contact the DGO at (301)
443–5204.
4. Reporting
A. Progress Report. Program progress
reports are required within 30 days of
the completion of the semi annual
report. These reports will include a brief
comparison of actual accomplishments
to the goals established for the period,
or, if applicable, provide sound
justification for the lack of progress, and
other pertinent information as required.
A final report must be submitted within
90 days of expiration of the budget/
project period.
B. Financial Status Report. Semiannual financial status reports must be
submitted within 30 days of the end of
the half year. Final financial status
reports are due within 90 days of
expiration of the budget/project period.
Standard Form 269 (long form) will be
used for financial reporting.
C. Reports. Grantees are responsible
and accountable for accurate reporting
of the Progress Reports and Financial
Status Reports which are generally due
semi-annually. Financial Status Reports
(SF–269) are due 90 days after each
budget period and the final SF–269
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16869
must be verified from the grantee
records on how the value was derived.
Grantees must submit reports in a
reasonable period of time.
Failure to submit required reports
within the time allowed may result in
suspension or termination of an active
grant, withholding of additional awards
for the project, or other enforcement
actions such as withholding of
payments or converting to the
reimbursement method of payment.
Continued failure to submit required
reports may result in one or both of the
following: (1) the imposition of special
award provisions; and (2) the nonfunding or non-award of other eligible
projects or activities. This applies
whether the delinquency is attributable
to the failure of the grantee organization
or the individual responsible for
preparation of the reports.
5. Telecommunication for the hearing
impaired is available at: TTY (301) 443–
6394.
VII. Agency Contact(s)
For program-related information
regarding the IHS Elder Care Program:
Bruce Finke, MD, Nashville Area Elder
Health Consultant, 45 Vernon Street,
Northampton, MA 01060, (413) 584–
0790, bruce.flnke@ihs.gov.
For general information regarding this
announcement: Ms. Orlinda Platero,
Office Clinical and Preventive Services,
Indian Health Service, 801 Thompson
Avenue, Suite 326, Rockville, Maryland
20852, (301) 443–2522, Fax: (301) 594–
6213.
For specific grant-related and
business management information: Ms.
Norma Jean Dunne, Division of Grant
Operations, Indian Health Service, 801
Thompson Avenue, TMP 360–79,
Rockville, Maryland 20852, (301) 443–
5204, Fax: (301) 443–9602.
VIII. Other Information
The Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) is committed to
achieving the health promotion and
disease prevention objectives of Healthy
People 2010, a HHS led activity for
setting priority areas. This project will
aid the accomplishment of Healthy
People 2010 Focus Area 1—Access.
Specifically, it will aid the
accomplishment of objective 1–15,
‘‘Increase the proportion of persons with
long-term care needs who have access to
the continuum of long-term care
services.’’ Potential applicants may
obtain a printed copy of Healthy People
2010, (Summary Report No, 017–001–
00549–5) or CD-ROM, Stock No. 0 17–
001–00549–5, through the
Superintendent of Documents,
Government Printing Office, P.O. Box
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
16870
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 62 / Monday, March 31, 2008 / Notices
371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250–7945,
(202) 512–1800. You may also access
this information at the following Web
site; https://www.healthypeople.gov/
Publications.
The IHS is focusing efforts on three
Health Initiatives that, linked together,
have the potential to achieve positive
improvements in the health of AI/AN
people. These three initiatives are
Health Promotion/Disease Prevention,
Management of Chronic Disease, and
Behavioral Health. Further information
is available at the Health Initiatives Web
site: https://www.ihs.gov/
NonMedicalPrograms/DirInitiatives/
index.cfm.
Dated: March 24, 2008.
Robert G. McSwain,
Acting Director, Indian Health Service.
[FR Doc. E8–6409 Filed 3–28–08; 8:45 am]
INPATIENT HOSPITAL PER DIEM RATE I. Funding Opportunity Description
(EXCLUDES
PHYSICIAN/PRACTIThe purpose of the program is to
TIONER SERVICES)
award cooperative agreements that
[Calendar Year 2008]
Lower 48 States ...........................
Alaska ...........................................
Outpatient per Visit Rate (Excluding Medicare)
Lower 48 States ...........................
Alaska ...........................................
Lower 48 States ...........................
Alaska ...........................................
Medicare Part B Inpatient Ancillary per Diem
Rate
Established Medicare rates for freestanding
Ambulatory Surgery Centers
Effective Date for Calendar Year 2008
Rates
Consistent with previous annual rate
revisions, the Calendar Year 2008 rates
will be effective for services provided
on/or after January 1, 2008 to the extent
consistent with payment authorities
including the applicable Medicaid State
plan.
RIN 0917–ZA22
Reimbursement Rates for Calendar
Year 2008
mmaher on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
Indian Health Service, HHS.
Notice.
SUMMARY: Notice is given that the
Director of Indian Health Service (IHS),
under the authority of sections 321(a)
and 322(b) of the Public Health Service
Act (42 U.S.C. 248 and 249(b)), Public
Law 83–568 (42 U.S.C. 2001 (a)), and
the Indian Health Care Improvement
Act (25 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.), has
approved the following rates for
inpatient and outpatient medical care
provided by IHS facilities for Calendar
Year 2008 for Medicare and Medicaid
beneficiaries and beneficiaries of other
Federal programs. The Medicare Part A
inpatient rates are excluded from the
table below as they are paid based on
the prospective payment system. Since
the inpatient rates set forth below do not
include all physician services and
practitioner services, additional
payment may be available to the extent
that those services meet applicable
requirements. Public Law 106–554,
section 432, dated December 21, 2000,
authorized IHS facilities to file Medicare
Part B claims with the carrier for
payment for physician and certain other
practitioner services provided on or
after July 1, 2001.
18:00 Mar 28, 2008
$373
650
Outpatient Surgery Rate (Medicare)
Indian Health Service
VerDate Aug<31>2005
$215
365
Lower 48 States ...........................
Alaska ...........................................
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
ACTION:
$253
423
Outpatient per Visit Rate (Medicare)
BILLING CODE 4165–16–M
AGENCY:
$1,811
2,255
Jkt 214001
Dated: November 29, 2007.
Robert G. McSwain,
Acting Director, Indian Health Service.
Editorial Note: This document was
received at the Office of the Federal Register
on March 25, 2008.
[FR Doc. E8–6431 Filed 3–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Indian Health Service
Tribal Self-Governance Program;
Negotiation Cooperative Agreement
Announcement Type: New.
Funding Announcement Number:
HHS–2008–IHS–TSGP–0001.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers(s): 93.210.
Key Dates: Application Deadline Date:
April 28, 2008.
Review Date: May 8–9, 2008.
Earliest Anticipated Start Date: June
1, 2008.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
provide negotiation resources to Tribes
interested in participating in the Tribal
Self-Governance Program (TSGP) as
authorized by Title V, Tribal SelfGovernance Amendments of 2000 of the
Indian Self-Determination and
Education Assistance Act of Public Law
(Pub. L.) 93–638, as amended. There is
limited competition under this
announcement because the authorizing
legislation, Public Law 106–260, Title V,
restricts eligibility to Tribes that meet
specific criteria (Refer to Section III.l.A.,
ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS in this
announcement). The TSGP is designed
to promote self-determination by
allowing Tribes to assume more control
of Indian Health Service (IHS) programs
and services through compacts
negotiated with the IHS. The
Negotiation Cooperative Agreement
provides Tribes with funds to help
cover the expenses involved in
preparing for and negotiating with the
IHS and assists eligible Indian Tribes to
prepare Compacts and Funding
Agreements (FAs). This program is
described at 93.210 in the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA).
The Negotiation Cooperative
Agreement provides resources to assist
Indian Tribes to conduct negotiation
activities that include but are not
limited to:
1. Determine what programs, services,
functions, and activities (PSFAs) will be
negotiated.
2. Identification of Tribal shares that
will be included in the FA.
3. Development of the terms and
conditions that will be set forth in the
FA.
The award of a Negotiation
Cooperative Agreement is not required
as a prerequisite to enter the TSGP.
Indian Tribes that have completed
comparable health planning activities in
previous years using Tribal resources
but have not received a Tribal selfgovernance planning award are also
eligible to apply.
II. Award Information
Type of Awards: Cooperative
Agreement.
Estimated Funds Available: The total
amount identified for Fiscal Year (FY)
2008 is $240,000 for approximately
twelve (12) Tribes. Awards under this
announcement are subject to the
availability of funds.
Anticipated Number of Awards: The
estimated number of awards under the
program to be funded is approximately
12.
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 62 (Monday, March 31, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16862-16870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-6409]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Indian Health Service
Office of Clinical and Preventive Services; Elder Care Initiative
Long-Term Care Grant Program
Announcement Type: New.
Funding Announcement Number: HHS-2008-IHS-EHC-0001.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers: 93.933.
Key Dates:
Letter of Intent Deadline: May 2, 2008.
Application Deadline Date: June 20, 2008.
Review Date: July 21-August 1, 2008.
Earliest Anticipated Start Date: September 1, 2008.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
The Indian Health Service (IHS) announces the availability of up to
$600,000 for competitive grants through the Elder Care Initiative Long
Term Care (ECILTC) Grant Program to support planning and implementation
of sustainable long-term care services for American Indians and Alaska
Native (AI/AN) elders. This program is authorized under the Snyder Act,
Indian Health Care Improvement Act, as amended, 25 U.S.C. 1653(c), and
Public Health Service Act, Section 301, as amended. This program is
described at 93.933 in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA).
The AI/AN elder population is growing rapidly and the Al/AN
population as a whole is aging. The prevalence of chronic disease in
this population continues to increase, contributing to a frail elder
population with increasing long-term care (LTC) needs.
LTC is best understood as an array of social and health care
services that support an individual who has needs for assistance in
activities of daily living over a prolonged period. LTC supports elders
and their families with medical, personal, and social services
delivered in a variety of settings to support quality of life, maximum
function, and dignity. While families continue to be the backbone of
LTC for Al/AN elders, there is well documented need to support this
care with formal services. The way these services and systems of care
are developed and implemented can have a profound impact on the
cultural and spiritual health of the community.
Home and community-based services have the potential for meeting
the needs of the vast majority of elders requiring LTC services,
supporting the key roles of the family in the care of the elder and
[[Page 16863]]
the elder in the care of the family and community. A LTC system with a
foundation in HCBS will also comply with the United States Supreme
Court interpretation of the Americans with Disabilities Act in Olmstead
v. L.C., 527 U.S. 581 (1999). The 28 CFR 35.130(d) ruling obligates
States and localities to provide care for persons with disability ``in
the most integrated setting appropriate to the needs of qualified
individuals with disabilities.'' An efficient and effective LTC system
would make use of all available resources, integrating and coordinating
services to assist families in the care of their elders.
The primary focus for planning and program development for AI/AN
LTC is at the Tribal and urban community level. Tribes and communities
have very different histories, capabilities, and resources with regard
to LTC program development. Each Tribe or community will have different
priorities in building LTC infrastructure. It is critical that the
development of LTC services be well grounded in an assessment of need
based on population demographics and rates of functional impairment.
LTC services should be acceptable to elders and their families and
consistent with community values in their implementation. The services
should be a part of an overall vision and plan for a LTC system to
support elders and their families.
There are a number of elements (Tribal sovereignty and the
government-to government relationship, the unique funding structure of
Indian health, and the importance of the cultural context) that
distinguish AI/AN LTC. Tribes and AL/AN organizations have found it
useful to look both inside and outside of the Indian Health system
(IHS, Tribal, and urban Indian health programs) for LTC strategies and
models.
The planning and design of LTC services must identify the revenue
source(s) that will support the delivery of care. Finding resources for
LTC services presents a formidable challenge. Funds appropriated
through the IHS (whether direct service or Tribal) can provide
healthcare services which are part of a LTC system, but do not provide
for a comprehensive set of LTC services and cannot support housing or
social services of a non-medical nature. Programs funded through the
Administration on Aging American Indian, Alaska Native and Native
Hawaiian Program (e.g. Title VI A and Title VI C Family Caregiver
Support Program) have been key elements in the LTC infrastructure in
AI/AN communities. Additional Older American Act resources may be
available through State Units on Aging and Area Agencies on Aging.
Other resources are available to provide LTC services on a reimbursable
basis for eligible AI/AN elders. The majority of formal LTC services in
this country are funded by reimbursements from state Medicaid and HCBS
programs. The Veterans Administration may be a source of reimbursement
for LTC services for eligible AI/AN veterans. Federal housing programs
are a potential resource in developing the housing component of the LTC
infrastructure. Each of these resources has unique eligibility
requirements. Development of reimbursement-based LTC services often
requires an ongoing investment of funds to support delivery of services
during the initial period of client recruitment, start-up of services,
and the receipt of reimbursement for those services.
This grant program is designed to provide support for the
development of AI/AN LTC, with funding for either assessment and
planning, or program implementation. LTC services developed with
support of this grant program must be those which the IIHS has the
authority to provide, either directly or through funding agreement, and
must be designed to serve IRS beneficiaries. Most Tribes and urban
communities are building toward their ideal LTC system incrementally,
adding new or integrating existing services over time. The goal of this
grant program is to support Tribes, Tribal Organizations, Tribal
consortia, and Urban Indian health programs as they build LTC systems
and services that meet the needs of their elders and that keep elders
engaged and involved in the lives of their families and communities.
II. Award Information
Type of Awards: Grant.
Estimated Funds Available: The total amount identified for fiscal
year (FY) 2008 is up to $600,000. The project period for the grants is
24 months in duration and each budget period is approximately 12
months. The award amounts are set at $50,000-$75,000 each year,
depending on the project category. Continuation awards are subject to
the availability of funds and satisfactory performance.
Anticipated Number of Awards: 8-10 awards will be made under this
program announcement.
Project Period: Two Years (24 months).
Award Amount:
$50,000 per year for Category 1--Assessment and Planning Awards.
$75,000 per year for Category 2--Implementation Awards.
Category 1--Assessment and Planning awards will support the
following activities:
a. Demographic assessment of the population and assessment of LTC
needs on a population basis.
b. Evaluation of existing services and resources for LTC.
c. Evaluation of potential resources to fund LTC services.
d. Assessment of cultural and religious values regarding care of
the elder for the population(s) served.
e. Assessment of elder preferences for type, structure, and setting
of services.
f. Establishment of a comprehensive vision for LTC services with
priorities for implementation.
g. Identification of potential funding sources for program
development and for ongoing financing of service delivery.
h. The integration and incorporation of the above elements into a
report or other document that guides LTC services/system
implementation, including a plan for sustainability.
Category 2--Implementation awards will support the following
activities: Implementation of a service or group of services that add
capacity to the LTC system of the applicant's Tribe or organization.
The implementation plan should be based on a comprehensive assessment
and plan, including a business plan, The services should be designed to
be self-sustaining at the end of the project period.
Applications must be for only one Project Type. Applications that
address more than one Project Type will be considered ineligible and
will be returned to the applicant. The maximum funding level includes
both direct and indirect costs. Applications with budgets which exceed
the maximum funding level or project period identified for a Project
Type will not be reviewed.
III. Eligibility Information
1. The AI/AN applicant must be one of the following:
A. A Federally-recognized Indian Tribe; or
B. Tribal organization as defined by 25 U.S.C. 1603(e); or
C. Urban Indian organization as defined by 25 U.S.C. 1603(h); or
D. A consortium of eligible Tribes, Tribal organization or urban
Indian health programs authorized by governing bodies to apply for and
receive awards on their behalf under this program announcement.
Applicants must provide proof of non-profit status with the
application.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching--The ECILTC Grant Program does not
require matching funds or cost sharing.
[[Page 16864]]
3. Other Requirements:
A. A Letter of Intent (LOI) to apply is required and must be
postmarked no later than May 2, 2008. The LOI is a mandatory but non-
binding request for information that will assist in planning both the
review and post award phase. There is no penalty for submitting a LOI
and not proceeding with the grant application but a grant will not be
reviewed if a LOI was not submitted. See Section IV.6.a for detailed
instructions for submission of the LOI.
B. The following documentation (as applicable) is required for an
application to be considered complete:
1. Tribal Resolution--A resolution of the Indian Tribe served by
the project must accompany the application submission. An Indian Tribe
that is proposing a project affecting another Indian Tribe must include
resolutions from all affected Tribes to be served. Applications by
Tribal organizations will not require a specific Tribal resolution if
the current Tribal resolution(s) under which they operate would
encompass the proposed grant activities. Draft resolutions are
acceptable in lieu of an official resolution. However, an official
signed Tribal resolution must be received by the Division of Grants
Operations (DGO) prior to the beginning of the Objective Review, July
21, 2008. If an official signed resolution is not received by July 21,
2008, the application will be considered incomplete, ineligible for
review, and returned to the applicant without consideration. Applicants
submitting additional documentation after the initial application
submission are required to ensure the information was received by the
IBS by obtaining documentation confirming delivery (i.e. FedEx
tracking, postal return receipt, etc.).
2. Tribal Consortium--If a consortium is submitting an application
it must:
Identify each of the consortium member Tribes.
Identify if any of the member Tribes intend to submit a
LTC grant application of their own.
Demonstrate that Tribes, Tribal organizations, urban
Indian health programs, or Tribal consortia's application does not
duplicate or overlap any objectives of the other consortium members who
may be submitting their own LTC grant application.
Any application received from a Consortium that does not meet the
requirements above will be considered ineligible for review.
Tribes, Tribal organizations, urban Indian health
programs, or Tribal consortia's receiving Category I (Assessment and
Planning funding) in the FY2006-2007 [ITIS Elder Care Initiative grant
cycle will be considered ineligible for FY2008 Category I (Assessment
and Planning) funding unless they can demonstrate that the current
application serves a different population than the FY2006-2007 grant.
(e.g. a consortium may target different Tribes).
Tribes, Tribal organizations, urban Indian health
programs, or Tribal consortias receiving Category II (Implementation)
grants in the FY2006-2007 IHS Elder Health Care Initiative Grants cycle
will be considered ineligible for FY2008 Category II (Implementation)
funding unless they can demonstrate that they will be implementing an
entirely new service or program (e.g. an applicant with current funding
to implement an Adult Day Health Program may now apply for funding to
implement a personal care program).
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Applicant package may be found in Grants.gov (www.grants.gov) or
at: https://www.ihs.gov/NonMedicalPrograms/gogp/gogp_funding.asp.
Information regarding the electronic application process may be
directed to Michelle G. Bulls, at (301) 443-6290.
Information regarding the Letter of Intent may be obtained from:
Ms. Orlinda Platero, Office Clinical and Preventive Services, Indian
Health Service, 801 Thompson Avenue, Suite 220, Rockville, Maryland
20852, (301) 443-2522, Fax: 301-594-6213.
The entire application package along with downloadable application
instructions is available at: https://www.grants.gov. Details regarding
the ECILTC Grant Program are available at: https://www.ihs.gov/
MedicalPrograms/ElderCare/. Detailed application instructions for this
announcement are downloadable on Grants.gov.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission:
Be single spaced.
Be typewritten.
Have consecutively numbered pages.
Use black type not smaller than 12 characters per one
inch.
Contain a narrative that does not exceed ten-typed pages.
See Section V for instructions for the content of the narrative. The
ten page narrative does not include the detailed work plan with
timeline, standard forms, Tribal resolutions or letters of support (if
necessary), table of contents, budget, budget justifications, budget
narrative, and/or other appendix items.
Public Policy Requirements: All Federal-wide public policies apply
to IRS grants with the exception of the discrimination public policy.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications must be submitted electronically through Grants.gov by
12:00 midnight Eastern Standard Time (EST). If technical challenges
arise and the applicant is unable to successfully complete the
electronic application process, the applicant should contact Grants
Policy Staff (UPS) at (301) 443-6290 at least fifteen days prior to the
application deadline and advise of the difficulties that your
organization is experiencing. The grantee must obtain prior approval,
in writing (e-mails are acceptable) allowing the paper submission. If
submission of a paper application is requested and approved, the
original and two copies may be sent to the appropriate grants contact
that is listed in Section P1.2., above. Applications not submitted
through Grants.gov, without an approved waiver, may be returned to the
applicant without review or consideration. Late applications will not
be accepted for processing, will be returned to the applicant, and will
not be considered for funding.
4. Intergovernmental Review:
Executive Order 12372 requiring intergovernmental review is not
applicable to this program.
5. Funding Restrictions:
Pre-award costs are allowable pending prior approval from
the awarding agency. However, in accordance with 45 CFR Part 74, all
pre-award costs are incurred at the recipient's risk. The awarding
office is under no obligation to reimburse such costs if for any reason
the applicant does not receive an award or if the award to the
recipient is less than anticipated.
The available funds are inclusive of direct and
appropriate indirect costs.
Only one grant will be awarded per applicant.
IHS will not acknowledge receipt of applications.
6. Other Submission Requirements:
If the applicant is unable to submit via Grants.gov and
obtains a waiver from the standard application requirements, please use
the following forms: SF-424, 424A, 424B, and certification forms, as
appropriate. One original and two copies must be submitted to: attn:
Norma Jean Dunne; Division of Grants Operations; 801 Thompson Avenue,
Rockville, MD 20852. Copies of the forms may be found at: https://
www.ihs.gov/
[[Page 16865]]
NonMedicalPrograms/gogp/index.cfm?module=forms. Applications are due by
June 20, 2008.
A LOI to apply is required and must be postmarked no later
than May 2, 2008. The LOI is a mandatory but non-binding request for
information that will assist in planning both the review and post award
phase. There is no penalty for submitting a LOI and not proceeding with
the grant application, but a grant will not be reviewed if a LOI was
not submitted. Applicants will be notified by fax or e-mail that their
LOI has been received, as it is received.
The LOI should be sent to Ms. Orlinda Platero at the following
address: Ms. Orlinda Platero, Office Clinical and Preventive Services,
Indian Health Service, 801 Thompson Avenue, Suite 326, Rockville,
Maryland 20852, Telephone: (301) 443-2522, Fax: (301) 594-6213, E-mail:
Orlinda.Platero@ihs.gov.
The LOI must contain:
The name of the applying organization.
The individual who is responsible for correspondence
regarding the application, and contact information for that individual.
Please indicate whether fax or e-mail notification of receipt of LOl is
preferred, and provide e-mail address and/or fax number.
The name of all member Tribes if the applicant is a Tribal
Consortium and those Tribes involved in the proposal.
Whether the intent is to apply for a Category I or
Category II grant.
Electronic Submission--The preferred method for receipt of
applications is electronic submission through Grants.gov. However,
should any technical challenges arise regarding the submission, please
contact Grants.gov Customer Support at 1-800-518-4726 or
support@grants.gov. The Contact Center hours of operation are Monday-
Friday from 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. EST. The applicant must seek assistance at
least fifteen days prior to the application deadline. Applicants that
don't adhere to the timelines for Central Contractor Registry (CCR)
and/or Grants.gov registration and/or requesting timely assistance with
technical issues will not be a candidate for paper applications.
To submit an application electronically, please use https://
www.Grants.gov and select the ``Apply for Grants'' link on the home
page. Download a copy of the application package on the Grants.gov Web
site, complete it offline and then upload and submit the application
via the Grants.gov site. You may not e-mail an electronic copy of a
grant application to IHS.
Please be reminded of the following:
Under the new IHS application submission requirements,
paper applications are not the preferred method. However, if you have
technical problems submitting your application on-line, please contact
directly Grants.gov Customer Support at: https://www.grants.gov/
CustomerSupport.
Upon contacting Grants.gov, obtain a tracking number as
proof of contact. The tracking number is helpful if there are technical
issues that cannot be resolved and a waiver request from GPS must be
obtained.
If it is determined that a formal waiver is necessary, the
applicant must submit a request, in writing (emails are acceptable), to
Michelle.Bulls@ihs.gov that includes a justification for the need to
deviate from the standard electronic submission process. Upon receipt
of approval, a hard-copy application package must be downloaded by the
applicant from: https://www.ihs.gov/NonMedicalPrograms/gogp/
index.cfm?rnodule=forms. Please use the following forms for the
standard application requirements: SF-424, 424A, 424B, and
certification forms, as appropriate. One original and two copies must
be submitted to: Attn: Norma Jean Dunne; Division of Grants Operations;
801 Thompson Avenue, TMP 360, Rockville, MD 20852 by the application
due date of June 20, 2008.
Upon entering the Grants.gov site, there is information
available that outlines the requirements to the applicant regarding
electronic submission of an application through Grants.gov, as well as
the hours of operation. We strongly encourage all applicants not to
wait until the deadline date to begin the application process through
Grants.gov as the registration process for CCR and Grants.gov could
take up to fifteen working days.
To use Grants.gov, you, as the applicant, must have a Data
Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number and register in the CCR. You
should allow a minimum often days working days to complete CCR
registration. See below on how to apply.
You must submit all documents electronically, including
all information typically included on the SF-424 and all necessary
assurances and certifications.
Please use the optional attachment feature in Grants.gov
to attach additional documentation that may be requested by IHS.
Your application must comply with any page limitation
requirements described in the program announcement.
After you electronically submit your application, you will
receive an automatic acknowledgment from Grants.gov that contains a
Grants.gov tracking number. The IRS, DGO will download your application
from Grants.gov and provide necessary copies to the cognizant program
office. DGO will not notify applicants that the application has been
received.
You may access the electronic application for this program
on https://www.Grants.gov.
You may search for the downloadable application package
either by the CFDA number or the Funding Opportunity Number. Both
numbers are identified in the heading of this announcement.
The applicant must provide the Funding Opportunity Number:
HHS-2008-IHS-EHC-0001. E-mail applications will not be accepted under
this announcement.
DUNS Number
Applicants are required to have a DUNS number to apply for a grant
or cooperative agreement from the Federal Government. The DUNS number
is a nine-digit identification number, which uniquely identifies
business entities. Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com
or call 1-866-705-5711. Interested parties may wish to obtain their
DUNS number by phone to expedite the process.
Applications submitted electronically must also be registered with
the CCR. A DUNS number is required before CCR registration can be
completed. Many organizations may already have a DUNS number. Please
use the number listed above to investigate whether or not your
organization has a DUNS number. Registration with the CCR is free of
charge.
Applicants may register by calling 1-888-227-2423. Please review
and complete the CCR Registration Worksheet located on https://
www.grants.gov/CCRRegister.
More detailed information regarding these registration processes
can be found at https://www.grants.gov.
V. Application Review Information
Note: Only those programs or services which the IHS is
authorized to provide, either directly or through funding agreement,
can be supported by this grant program. UNLESS CONGRESS PROVIDES
OTHERWISE, those services which are primarily housing or custodial
in nature are not eligible for support (e.g. assisted living
facility, board and care, or nursing home which is primarily
custodial in nature). Supportive services delivered in those
facilities, with the intent to promote the health and wellness of
elders, are eligible for
[[Page 16866]]
funding. Programs and services developed with support of this grant
program must be designed for the benefit of IHS beneficiaries.
The instructions for preparing the application narrative also
constitute the evaluation criteria for reviewing and scoring the
application. Weights assigned to each section are noted in parentheses.
The narrative should include only the first year of activities;
information for multi-year projects should be included as an appendix.
See ``Multi-year Project Requirements'' at the end of this section for
more information. The narrative section should be written in a manner
that is clear to outside reviewers unfamiliar with prior related
activities of the applicant. It should be well organized, succinct, and
contain all information necessary for reviewers to understand the
project fully.
1. Criteria
A. Category I (Assessment and Planning)
1. Introduction and Need for Assistance (35 Points)
Provide an understanding of the LTC needs of the elderly in the
Tribe or service area and identify the additional information needed
for planning. The number of elders that will be affected by the program
will be considered a factor in the review as will the relationship of
the amount of funding requested to the number of elders to be served.
The applicant should use the best data available, understanding that,
for most programs, many of these data elements will not be available or
be poor in quality and that improved data for future planning will be
an outcome of this grant-funded project. Data that is not available
should be noted as such and addressed in the work plan (Section 2).
Identify all information sources.
a. Currently available information for use in planning and service
development:
i. Currently available information regarding population and need
for services.
1. Demographics of the population and assessment of LTC needs on a
population basis.
2. Geographic and social factors, including availability of
caregivers.
3. Cultural and religious values regarding care of the elder for
the population(s) to be served.
4. Elder preferences for type, structure, and setting of services.
ii. Currently available information regarding existing services and
resources for LTC:
1. Availability and organization of existing aging and LTC
services, including services available to Tribal or community members
provided by non-Tribal/non-AI/AN organization programs.
2. Availability and organization of health services for the
elderly, including Native healing systems.
3. Assessment of the capacity of available LTC services to support
care provided ``in the most integrated setting appropriate to the needs
of qualified individuals with disabilities'' (Olmstead v. L.C).
4. Assessment of caregiver workforce.
iii. Funding streams currently paying for LTC services.
iv. Current collaborations in program development or service
delivery.
b. Current vision for LTC system/services and priorities for
development.
c. Elder care assessment and planning activities within the past
ten years:
i. Funding sources.
ii. Dates of funding.
iii. Summary of project accomplishments.
iv. Relationship to the current proposal. Copies of reports will
not be accepted.
d. Unmet need for LTC services.
e. Information needed for planning and service implementation which
is not currently available.
2. Work Plan (35 Points)
This section should demonstrate the soundness and effectiveness of
the applicant's proposal. The work plan should be designed to produce
as an end product the readiness to develop LTC service(s) and should
include all information not already available. For an example of the
information needed to demonstrate readiness to develop LTC service(s),
see Section 1 Introduction and Need for Assistance in the Category II
Implementation criteria.
Note that attendance and presentation at the AI/AN Long Term Care
Conference and participation in periodic grantee teleconferences are a
requirement of the grant and should be included as activities in the
work plan.
a. State the proposed assessment or planning process.
b. List the objectives clearly.
i. Identify the data elements needed.
ii. Indicate the function of each data element in the plan.
c. Describe the approach to the project.
i. Tasks.
ii. Resources needed to implement and complete the project.
iii. Timeline.
iv. Specialized technical resources for data collection or
analysis.
v. Training needs.
Include in work plan attendance and presentation at the
annual AI/AN Long Term Care Conference.
d. Identify the final product of the assessment/plan and the
strategy for dissemination.
e. Submit a work plan in the appendix which includes the following
information:
i. Action steps on a time line for implementation of the work plan.
ii. Identify who will perform the action steps.
iii. Identify who will supervise the action steps.
iv. Identify who will accept and/or approve work products at the
end of the proposed project.
v. Include any additional training that will take place during the
proposed project, who will conduct the training, and who will be
attending the training.
vi. Include the following information if consultants or contractors
will be used during the proposed project, their position description
and scope of work (or note if consultants/contractors will not be
used):
Educational requirements.
Desired qualifications and work experience.
Expected work products.
Contractor's supervisor.
Include a resume and letter of commitment in the appendix
for potential consultant/contractor.
3. Project Evaluation (10 Points)
This section should show how progress on this project will be
assessed and how the success of this project will be judged.
a. Describe and list outcomes by which this project will be
evaluated. Each proposed project objective and task of the work plan
should be evaluated and the evaluation activities should appear on the
work plan.
b. Identify the responsible person for the evaluation (need not be
an outside evaluator).
4. Organizational Capabilities and Qualifications (10 Points)
This section outlines the broader capacity of the Tribe, Tribal
organization, or urban health program to complete the project outlined
in the work plan. It includes the identification of personnel
responsible for completing tasks and chain of responsibility for
successful completion of the project outlined in the work plan.
a. Describe the organizational structure of the Tribe/Tribal
organization beyond health care activities.
b. Describe the ability of the organization to manage the proposed
project. Include information regarding similarly sized projects in
scope and financial assistance as well as other
[[Page 16867]]
grants and projects successfully completed.
c. Describe what equipment (i.e., fax machine, phone, computer,
etc.) and facility space (i.e., office space) will be available for use
during the proposed project. Include information about any equipment
not currently available that will be purchased through the grant.
d. List key personnel who will work on the project.
i. Identify existing personnel and new program staff to be hired.
ii. Include in the appendix, position descriptions and resumes for
all key personnel. Position descriptions should clearly describe each
position and duties, indicating desired qualifications experience,
requirements related to the proposed project and how they will be
supervised. Resumes must indicate that the proposed staff member is
qualified to carry out the proposed project activities and who will
determine if the work of a contractor is acceptable.
iii. Note who will be writing the progress reports.
iv. Indicate if a position is to be filled for a proposed position
description.
v. Note and address how additional personnel beyond those covered
by the grant funds, (i.e., IT support, volunteers, interviewers, etc.),
will be filled and if funds are required, list the funding source.
vi. Indicate the percentage of time to be allocated to this project
and identify the resources used to fund the remainder of the
individual's salary if personnel are to be only partially funded by
this grant.
5. Categorical Budget and Budget Justification (10 Points)
This section should provide a clear estimate of the project program
costs and justification for expenses for the entire grant period. The
budget and budget justification should be consistent with the tasks
identified in the work plan.
a. Categorical budget (Form SF 424A, Budget Information Non
Construction Programs) completing each of the budget periods requested.
b. Include a narrative justification for all costs, explaining why
each line item is necessary or relevant to the proposed project.
Include sufficient details to facilitate the determination of cost
allowability.
c. Indicate any special start-up costs.
d. Include a brief program narrative budget justification for the
second year.
e. If indirect costs are claimed, indicate and apply the current
negotiated rate to the budget. Include a copy of the rate agreement in
the appendix.
B. Category II (Program Implementation)
1. Introduction and Need for Assistance (35 points)
Provide an understanding of current need for and availability of
LTC services for the elderly in the Tribe or service area. Identify the
number of elders to be served. The number of elders that will be
affected by the program will be considered a factor in the review as
will the relationship of the amount of funding requested to the number
of elders to be served. Demonstrate the necessary assessment and
planning to successfully implement new service(s) and show that the
services fit within a comprehensive vision or plan for elder care. If
significant elements listed below are not available, programs should
consider applying for Category I funding to support the assessment and
planning activities necessary for successful program development.
a. Demographic assessment of the population and assessment of LTC
needs on a population basis.
i. Population distribution. Number of elderly of different age and
gender groups in the population.
ii. Rates of functional impairment and numbers of elders with need
for assistance in activities in daily living with adequate detail to
project need for services.
b. Geographic and social factors that affect access to services and
availability of caregivers.
i. Rural vs. urban; population density.
ii. Family structure and organization. c. Assessment of cultural
and religious values regarding care of the elder for the population(s)
to be served.
d. Assessment of elder preferences for type, structure, and setting
of services.
e. Evaluation of existing services and resources for LTC.
i. Availability and organization of existing aging and LTC
services. Include services available to Tribal or community members
provided by programs or organizations that are not Tribal or AI/AN
organizations.
ii. Availability and organization of health services for the
elderly, including Native healing systems.
iii. Capacity of existing LTC services to support care provided
``in the most integrated setting appropriate to the needs of qualified
individuals with disabilities'' (Olmstead v. L.C).
f. Assessment of caregiver workforce.
i. Availability of potential caregivers (formal and informal).
ii. Training resources for formal and informal caregivers.
g. Identification of potential resources for new LTC service.
i. Funding for program development.
ii. Funding for ongoing service delivery.
iii. Potential partners in program development.
h. Relevant Federal, 11-IS, Tribal and/or State standards, laws and
regulations and codes and relevant licensure or certification
requirements.
i. A comprehensive vision or plan for LTC systems/services which
incorporates the information above and identifies priorities for
implementation.
j. Unmet need for LTC services.
2. Work Plan (35 points)
This section should demonstrate the soundness and effectiveness of
the applicant's proposal. This includes both the work plan for program
implementation and the underlying plan or strategy for sustainability
of the service(s) past the point of grant support. Note that attendance
and presentation at the AI/AN LTC Conference and participation in
periodic grantee teleconferences are a requirement of the grant and
should be included as activities in the work plan.
a. Identify the LTC service(s) to be implemented and:
i. Show how it is consistent with the results of the assessment/
planning process described above (Introduction and Need for
Assistance).
ii. Integrates with existing LTC and health services.
b. Summarize the business plan or plan for self-sufficiency and
sustainability, including:
i. Funding stream(s) to support ongoing services.
ii. Clearly indicate whether the program will be self-supporting
(and if so, when) or not. If not self-supporting, what will be the
source of additional revenue for services?
iii. Timeline with projections for client recruitment, expected
revenue and shortfalls, resources for funds needed to bridge between
onset of services and collection of reimbursement, etc.
iv. Licensure or certification requirements.
v. Indicate if Tribal revenue is expected to pay in part or in
whole for services. A letter from the Tribal Council or administration
indicating that these funds have been budgeted for this purpose should
be included in the appendix.
c. Describe the approach to implementation.
i. Tasks.
ii. Resources needed to implement and complete the project.
iii. Timeline for implementation.
iv. Specialized technical resources.
v. Training needs.
[[Page 16868]]
Include in work plan attendance and presentation at the
annual AI/AN Long Term Care Conference.
vi. Consultation needs (if any).
d. Include a detailed work plan in the appendix, containing the
following information:
i. Action steps on a time line for implementation of the work plan.
ii. Identify who will perform the action steps.
iii. Identify who will supervise the action steps.
iv. Identify who will accept and/or approve work products at the
end of the proposed project.
v. Include any additional training that will take place during the
proposed project,
vi. Include the following information if consultants or contractors
will be used during the proposed project, their position description
and scope of work (or note if consultants/contractors will not be
used):
Educational requirements.
Desired qualifications and work experience.
Expected work products.
Contractor's supervisor.
Include a resume and letter of commitment in the appendix
for potential consultant/contractor.
e. Include a detailed business plan in the appendix, containing the
following information:
i. Timeline with detailed expense and revenue projections.
ii. Timeline with client recruitment projections.
iii. Timeline with licensure or certification requirements and
tasks.
iv. Identification of shortfall funding during implementation with
documentation of the availability of budgeted funds to support the
program until it is self-sustaining (if applicable).
3. Project Evaluation (10 Points)
This section should show how progress on this project will be
assessed and how the success of this project will be judged.
a. Specifically list and describe the outcomes by which this
project will be evaluated.
b. Identify the evaluator and/or the individual with responsibility
for the evaluation (need not be an outside evaluator).
c. Each proposed project objective and task of the work plan should
be able to be evaluated and the evaluation activities should appear on
the work plan.
4. Organizational Capabilities and Qualifications (10 Points)
This section outlines the broader capacity of the Tribe, Tribal
organization, or urban health program to complete the project outlined
in the work plan. This includes the identification of personnel
responsible for completing tasks and chain of responsibility for
successful completion of the project outlined in the work plan. a.
Describe the organizational structure of the Tribe/Tribal organization
beyond health care activities.
b. If management systems are already in place, simply note it.
c. Describe the ability of the organization to manage the proposed
project. Include information regarding similarly sized projects in
scope and financial assistance as well as other grants and projects
successfully completed.
d. Describe what equipment (i.e., fax machine, phone, computer,
etc.) and facility space (i.e., office space) will be available for use
during the proposed project. Include information about any equipment
not currently available that will be purchased through the grant.
e. List key personnel who will work on the project.
i. Identify existing personnel and new program staff to be hired.
ii. Include position descriptions and resumes for all key personnel
in the appendix. Position descriptions should clearly describe each
position and duties, indicating desired qualifications experience,
requirements related to the proposed project and how they will be
supervised. Resumes must indicate that the proposed staff member is
qualified to carry out the proposed project activities and who will
determine if the work of a contractor is acceptable.
iii. Note who will be writing the progress reports.
iv. Indicate if a position is to be filled for a proposed position
description.
v. Note and address how additional personnel beyond those covered
by the grant funds, (i.e., IT support, volunteers, interviewers, etc.),
will be filled and if funds are required, list the funding source.
vi. Indicate the percentage of time to be allocated to this project
and identify the resources used to fund the remainder of the
individual's salary if personnel are to be only partially funded by
this grant.
5. Categorical Budget and Budget Justification (10 Points)
This section should provide a clear estimate of the project program
costs and justification for expenses for the entire grant period. The
budget and budget justification should be consistent with the tasks
identified in the work plan.
a. Categorical budget (Form SF 424A, Budget Information Non-
Construction Programs) completing each of the budget periods requested.
b. Include a narrative justification for all costs, explaining why
each line item is necessary or relevant to the proposed project.
Include sufficient details to facilitate the determination of cost
allowability.
c. Indicate any special start-up costs.
d. Include a brief program narrative budget justification for the
second year.
e. Indicate and apply the current negotiated rate to the budget if
indirect costs are claimed. Include a copy of the rate agreement in the
appendix.
2. Review and Selection Process
In addition to the above criteria/requirements, applications are
considered according to the following:
a. Letter of Intent Submission (Deadline: May 2, 2008); and
b. Application Submission (Application Deadline: June 20, 2006).
Applications submitted in advance of or by deadline and verified by the
postmark will undergo a preliminary review to determine that:
The applicant and proposed project type is eligible in
accordance with this grant announcement.
The application is not a duplication of a previously
funded project.
The application narrative, forms, and materials submitted
meet the requirements of the announcement allowing the review panel to
undertake an in-depth evaluation; otherwise, it may be returned.
c. Competitive Review of Eligible Applications (Objective Review:
July 21-August 1, 2008).
Applications meeting eligibility requirements that are complete,
responsive, and conform to this program announcement will be reviewed
for merit by the Ad Hoc Objective Review Committee (ORC) appointed by
the IHS to review and make recommendations on these applications. The
review will be conducted in accordance with the IHS Objective Review
Guidelines. The technical review process ensures selection of quality
projects in a national competition for limited funding. Applications
will be evaluated and rated on the basis of the evaluation criteria
listed in Section V.1. and V.2. The criteria are used to evaluate the
quality of a proposed project, determine the likelihood of success, and
assign a numerical score to each application. The scoring of approved
applications will assist the IHS in determining which proposals will be
funded if the amount of funding is not sufficient to support all
approved applications. Applications
[[Page 16869]]
recommended for approval, having a score of 60 or above by the ORC and
scored high enough to be considered for funding, are ranked. Additional
considerations in final ranking include: geographic diversity among
funded programs, diversity in population size among Tribes and
communities served by funded programs, and unique features with regard
to type of program planned or population served. Applications scoring
below 60 points will be disapproved and returned to the applicant.
Applications that are approved but not funded will not be carried over
into the next cycle for funding consideration.
3. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates
Anticipated Award Notification: August 18, 2008.
Anticipated Award Start Date: September 1, 2008.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices
The Notice of Award (NoA) will be initiated by DGO and will be
mailed via postal mail to each entity that is approved for funding
under this announcement. The NoA will be signed by the Grants
Management Officer, and this is the authorizing document for which
funds are dispersed to the approved entities. The NoA will serve as the
official notification of the grant award and will reflect the amount of
Federal funds awarded, the purpose of the grant, the terms and
conditions of the award, the effective date of the award, and the
budget/project period. The NoA is the legally binding document.
Applicants who are approved but unfunded or disapproved based on their
Objective Review score will receive a copy of the Executive Summary
which identifies the weaknesses and strengths of the application
submitted.
2. Administrative Requirements
Grants are administrated in accordance with the following
documents:
This Program Announcement.
Administrative Requirements: 45 CFR Part 92, ``Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to
State, Local and Tribal Governments,'' or 45 CFR Part 74, ``Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Awards to Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, Other Non-Profit Organizations, and Commercial
Organizations.''
Grants Policy Guidance: HHS Grants Policy Statement,
January 2007.
Cost Principles: OMB Circular A-87, ``State, Local, and
Indian'' (Title 2 Part 225).
Cost Principles: OMB Circular A-122, ``Non-profit
Organizations'' (Title 2 Part 230).
Audit Requirements: OMB Circular A-133, ``Audits of
States, Local Governments, and Non-profit Organizations.''
3. Indirect Costs: This section applies to all grant recipients
that request reimbursement of indirect costs in their grant
application. In accordance with HHS Grants Policy Statement, Part 11-
27, IHS requires applicants to have a current indirect cost rate
agreement in place prior to award. The rate agreement must be prepared
in accordance with the applicable cost principles and guidance as
provided by the cognizant agency or office. A current rate means the
rate covering the applicable activities and the award budget period. If
the current rate is not on file with the DGO at the time of award, the
indirect cost portion of the budget will be restricted and not
available to the recipient until the current rate is provided to the
DGO.
Generally, indirect costs rates for IFIS grantees are negotiated
with the Division of Cost Allocation (DCA) https://rates.psc.gov/ and
the Department of Interior (National Business Center) https://
www.nbc.gov/acquisition/ics/icshome.html. If your organization has
questions regarding the indirect cost policy, please contact the DGO at
(301) 443-5204.
4. Reporting
A. Progress Report. Program progress reports are required within 30
days of the completion of the semi annual report. These reports will
include a brief comparison of actual accomplishments to the goals
established for the period, or, if applicable, provide sound
justification for the lack of progress, and other pertinent information
as required. A final report must be submitted within 90 days of
expiration of the budget/project period.
B. Financial Status Report. Semi-annual financial status reports
must be submitted within 30 days of the end of the half year. Final
financial status reports are due within 90 days of expiration of the
budget/project period. Standard Form 269 (long form) will be used for
financial reporting.
C. Reports. Grantees are responsible and accountable for accurate
reporting of the Progress Reports and Financial Status Reports which
are generally due semi-annually. Financial Status Reports (SF-269) are
due 90 days after each budget period and the final SF-269 must be
verified from the grantee records on how the value was derived.
Grantees must submit reports in a reasonable period of time.
Failure to submit required reports within the time allowed may
result in suspension or termination of an active grant, withholding of
additional awards for the project, or other enforcement actions such as
withholding of payments or converting to the reimbursement method of
payment. Continued failure to submit required reports may result in one
or both of the following: (1) the imposition of special award
provisions; and (2) the non-funding or non-award of other eligible
projects or activities. This applies whether the delinquency is
attributable to the failure of the grantee organization or the
individual responsible for preparation of the reports.
5. Telecommunication for the hearing impaired is available at: TTY
(301) 443-6394.
VII. Agency Contact(s)
For program-related information regarding the IHS Elder Care
Program: Bruce Finke, MD, Nashville Area Elder Health Consultant, 45
Vernon Street, Northampton, MA 01060, (413) 584-0790,
bruce.flnke@ihs.gov.
For general information regarding this announcement: Ms. Orlinda
Platero, Office Clinical and Preventive Services, Indian Health
Service, 801 Thompson Avenue, Suite 326, Rockville, Maryland 20852,
(301) 443-2522, Fax: (301) 594-6213.
For specific grant-related and business management information: Ms.
Norma Jean Dunne, Division of Grant Operations, Indian Health Service,
801 Thompson Avenue, TMP 360-79, Rockville, Maryland 20852, (301) 443-
5204, Fax: (301) 443-9602.
VIII. Other Information
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is committed to
achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of
Healthy People 2010, a HHS led activity for setting priority areas.
This project will aid the accomplishment of Healthy People 2010 Focus
Area 1--Access. Specifically, it will aid the accomplishment of
objective 1-15, ``Increase the proportion of persons with long-term
care needs who have access to the continuum of long-term care
services.'' Potential applicants may obtain a printed copy of Healthy
People 2010, (Summary Report No, 017-001-00549-5) or CD-ROM, Stock No.
0 17-001-00549-5, through the Superintendent of Documents, Government
Printing Office, P.O. Box
[[Page 16870]]
371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7945, (202) 512-1800. You may also access
this information at the following Web site; https://
www.healthypeople.gov/Publications.
The IHS is focusing efforts on three Health Initiatives that,
linked together, have the potential to achieve positive improvements in
the health of AI/AN people. These three initiatives are Health
Promotion/Disease Prevention, Management of Chronic Disease, and
Behavioral Health. Further information is available at the Health
Initiatives Web site: https://www.ihs.gov/NonMedicalPrograms/
DirInitiatives/index.cfm.
Dated: March 24, 2008.
Robert G. McSwain,
Acting Director, Indian Health Service.
[FR Doc. E8-6409 Filed 3-28-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-16-M