Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR), Office of Preparedness and Emergency Operations (OPEO), Revised National Disaster Medical System (NDMS) Patient Treatment and Tracking Records System, 16307-16308 [E8-6238]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 60 / Thursday, March 27, 2008 / Notices
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Office of Small Business Utilization;
Small Business Advisory Committee;
Notification of a Public Meeting of the
Small Business Advisory Committee
Office of the Secretary
Office of Small Business
Utilization, GSA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The General Services
Administration (GSA) is announcing a
public meeting of the GSA Small
Business Advisory Committee (the
Committee).
DATES: The meeting will take place
April 21, 2008. The meeting will begin
at 9:00 a.m. and conclude no later than
6:00 p.m. that day. The Committee will
accept oral public comments at this
meeting and has reserved a total of
thirty minutes for this purpose.
Members of the public wishing to
reserve speaking time must contact
Aaron Collmann in writing at:
sbac@gsa.gov or by fax at (202) 501–
2590, no later than one week prior to the
meeting.
ADDRESS: Marriott Anaheim, Gold Key I
and II, 700 W Convention Way,
Anaheim, CA 92802
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Aaron Collmann, Room 6029, GSA
Building, 1800 F Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20405; (202) 501–1021
or email at sbac@gsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice is published in accordance with
the provisions of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (FACA) (Pub. L. 92–
463). The purpose of this meeting is to
develop the topics generated during the
previous meetings; to receive briefings
from small business topical experts, and
to hear from interested members of the
public on proposals to improve GSA’s
small business contracting performance.
Topics for this meeting will include
discussion on GSA’s Veteran Outreach
Program (21 Gun Salute) and GSA’s role
in the Presidential Transition. Other
topics to be discussed may include, but
are not limited to, topics from previous
meetings. The agenda will be published
online at https://www.gsa.gov/sbac at
least 7 days prior to the meeting.
Information and agendas from previous
meetings can be found online at https://
www.gsa.gov/sbac.
Dated: March 24, 2008.
Felipe Mendoza,
Associate Administrator, Office of Small
Business Utilization, General Services
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–6274 Filed 3–26–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–34–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 Mar 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
Office of the Assistant Secretary for
Preparedness and Response (ASPR),
Office of Preparedness and Emergency
Operations (OPEO), Revised National
Disaster Medical System (NDMS)
Patient Treatment and Tracking
Records System
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Preparedness and
Response, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of a Revised Privacy Act
System of Records (SOR).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Privacy Act of 1974, we are proposing
to revise the new Privacy Act System of
Records (SOR) entitled, ‘‘The National
Disaster Medical System (NDMS)
Patient Treatment and Tracking Records
System,’’ System Number 09–90–0040,
in response to public comments
received. The primary purpose of the
NDMS Patient Treatment and Tracking
Records System is to collect and store
data about individuals who are served
by the medical care response
capabilities provided by the Department
of Health and Human Services (HHS)
through the NDMS, and through other
HHS medical personnel. The proposed
system will cover the collection, storage
and sharing of personally identifiable
data in accordance with the Privacy Act.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
In a Federal Register Notice [72 FR
35052–35055] published on June 26,
2007, the HHS, ASPR, OPEO, NDMS
proposed to establish the NDMS Patient
Treatment and Tracking Record System.
This system will collect demographic
and health care data from individuals
treated by the medical response
personnel of HHS and in particular,
ASPR. The HHS notice included reasons
why this system is necessary as well as
routine uses for disclosures. HHS
received comments from private, nonprofit organizations regarding the
privacy protections that apply to
information about individuals treated by
HHS medical personnel. The comments
suggested that the notice lacked clarity.
The following paragraphs summarize
the comments, recommendations and
the agency’s responses. We are also
making other editorial changes to the
System of Records Notice at this time.
B. Comments and Responses
Comment: There was an overall
comment that the notice lacked
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16307
adequate discussion of whether this
system would be maintained in
compliance with the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act
(HIPAA) Privacy Rule. It was
recommended that compliance with the
HIPAA Privacy Rule be ‘‘spelled out in
the notice.’’
Response: While ASPR, in operating
NDMS, provides medical care to
individuals who are victims of disasters,
emergencies, public health emergencies,
and events of national significance,
ASPR is not a covered entity or a health
care component of a covered entity, and
therefore is not subject to the HIPAA
Privacy Rule. Congress provided that
these HIPAA standards only apply to
health care providers that transmit
health information electronically in
connection with a transaction for which
the Secretary of HHS has adopted
standards (i.e., the standards provided
for in the HIPAA Transactions Rule at
45 CFR Part 162). NDMS health care
providers, operating under ASPR
auspices, do not engage in these
electronic transactions. However, the
records within the NDMS Patient
Treatment and Tracking Records System
are protected by the Privacy Act.
Comment: The organizations which
commented on the notice wanted to
make it clear that there will be ‘‘no
routine uses that are in violation of
HIPAA.’’
Response: As explained above, while
ASPR provides medical care to
individuals who are victims of disasters,
emergencies, public health emergencies,
and events of national significance,
ASPR is not subject to the HIPAA
Privacy Rule. The routine uses will
comply with the provisions of the
Privacy Act.
Comment: There was a comment
regarding clarifying the use of data by
NDMS’s federal partners.
Response: The language has been
clarified. Disclosure of personally
identifiable information between federal
partners will be limited to what is
needed to support patient care and
medical transport.
Comment: There is a concern that
routine disclosure of patient location,
especially when the patient is a victim
of domestic violence, should be
changed.
Response: Agree. The routine
disclosure to family members regarding
patient location and status has been
revised to state that disclosure is not
permitted when there is a reasonable
belief that such information could
endanger the life, safety, health, or wellbeing of the patient.
E:\FR\FM\27MRN1.SGM
27MRN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
16308
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 60 / Thursday, March 27, 2008 / Notices
Revised Document
1. The Categories of Individuals
Covered by the System section in the
System of Records Notice (SORN) is
revised to include other HHS personnel
who may treat individuals. The section
is revised as follows:
The individuals covered by the system
are all persons and owners of animals
treated by NDMS and other HHS
medical personnel when the NDMS
Disaster Medical Assistance Teams
(DMATs), National Veterinary Response
Teams (NVRTs), or other HHS medical
personnel are activated to respond to
emergency situations, or as a response
to any other situation for which they are
activated.
2. The Purpose(s) section in the SORN
is revised to include other HHS
personnel who may treat individuals.
The first sentence of that section is
revised to read:
Medical and demographic information
is collected on all patients seen and/or
treated by NDMS or other HHS
personnel.
3. Routine Use No. 1 in the SORN is
revised to clarify that it refers to sharing
information between NDMS partner
agencies, and to include a discussion, at
the end of the routine use, of the
relationship between all of the NDMS
partners regarding the use of medical
records as follows:
NDMS is a coordinated effort between
HHS, the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), the Department of
Defense (DoD), and the Department of
Veterans Affairs (VA). As such, the
medical treatment and movement of
patients is a shared responsibility
between these partnership agencies. The
medical and demographic information
collected during the treatment of a
patient is shared with the partners to
ensure that patients treated through
NDMS receive the appropriate level of
health care. The health information
disclosed among the partners is limited
to what is needed for continuity of
health care operations.
4. Routine Use No. 4 in the SORN is
revised to include volunteers as follows:
Disclosure to agency contractors,
consultants, grantees, or volunteers who
have been engaged by the agency to
assist in the performance of a service
related to this collection and who have
a need to have access to the records in
order to perform the activity.
5. Routine Use No. 6 in the SORN is
revised to include a discussion, at the
end of the routine use, of the
circumstances when the agency will not
disclose the patient’s location or status
to family members as follows:
Disclosure of a patient’s location or
status is not permitted when there is a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 Mar 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
reasonable belief that disclosing such
information could endanger the life,
safety, health, or well-being of the
patient.
6. In the SORN, in the Policies and
Practices for Storing, Retrieving,
Accessing, Retaining, and Disposing of
Records in the System, in the
Disposition authority subsection, the
first two sentences are revised as
follows:
Patient Care Forms or other Medical
Records created by the Federal Medical
Station(s) (FMS) or by any component of
HHS/ASPR inclusive of NDMS during a
response to an event while caring for
victims of that event are cutoff at the
end of the response activity by the
Federal Medical Station(s) or HHS/
ASPR component for a particular event.
Cutoff refers to breaking, or ending files
at regular intervals, usually at the close
of a fiscal or calendar year, to permit
their disposal or transfer in complete
blocks and, in this case, cutoff is at the
end of the response activity. The cutoff
date marks the beginning of the records
retention period.
Dated: March 3, 2008.
Kevin Yeskey,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Director, Office
of Preparedness and Emergency Operations.
[FR Doc. E8–6238 Filed 3–26–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–37–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
intention of the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request
that the Office of Management and
Budget (0MB) approve the proposed
information collection project: ‘‘Health
Care Systems for Tracking Colorectal
Cancer Screening Tests.’’ In accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), AHRQ
invites the public to comment on this
proposed information collection.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by May 27, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be submitted to: Doris Lefkowitz,
Reports Clearance Officer, AHRQ, by email at: doris.lefkowitz@ahrq.hhs.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Copies of the proposed collection
plans, data collection instruments, and
specific details on the estimated burden
can be obtained from the AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer, (301) 427–1477, or by
e-mail at: doris.lefkowitz@ahrq.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposed Project
Health Care Systems for Tracking
Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests
AHRQ proposes to implement and
assess a system redesign intervention to
improve colorectal cancer (CRC)
screening and follow-up among patients
50–79 years-old. Other goals of the
intervention include: (1) Achieving a
high level of satisfaction with the
intervention among patients, providers,
and practice staff, (2) promoting patientcentered care through the intervention,
(3) being a cost-effective intervention,
and (4) demonstrating the benefits to
businesses for implementing the
intervention. The research is sponsored
by AHRQ under its ACTION
(Accelerating Change and
Transformation in Organizations and
Networks) program, and will be
conducted for AHRQ by The CNA
Corporation (CNA) and its partners
Thomas Jefferson University (TJU) and
Lehigh Valley Physician Hospital
Organization (LVPHO).
Colorectal cancer screening is
recommended as routine preventive
care and this intervention, which is
consistent with current CRC screening
guidelines, carries no greater risk than
that which occurs in usual delivery of
healthcare (i.e., screening and follow up
done without benefit of this
intervention).
Nevertheless, as part of standard
research practice, the intervention and
assessment protocol will be submitted
to the Institutional Review Boards (IRB)
at both LVPHO and TJU so that they can
review the protocols to ensure that they
are consistent with the requirements of
human subjects protection as outlined
in federal statute, regulations, and
guidelines. These approvals will be
obtained before the study begins.
Additionally, CNA and LVPHO have a
business associate agreement, and all
parties involved with the study (CNA,
LVPHO, and TJU) will comply with the
Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy
Rule, 45 CFR Parts 160 and 164. To
further protect patient privacy, neither
CNA nor TJU will have access to any
personally-identifiable data. Only PHO
personnel will have access to
E:\FR\FM\27MRN1.SGM
27MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 60 (Thursday, March 27, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16307-16308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-6238]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Office of the Secretary
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response
(ASPR), Office of Preparedness and Emergency Operations (OPEO), Revised
National Disaster Medical System (NDMS) Patient Treatment and Tracking
Records System
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and
Response, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of a Revised Privacy Act System of Records (SOR).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, we are proposing
to revise the new Privacy Act System of Records (SOR) entitled, ``The
National Disaster Medical System (NDMS) Patient Treatment and Tracking
Records System,'' System Number 09-90-0040, in response to public
comments received. The primary purpose of the NDMS Patient Treatment
and Tracking Records System is to collect and store data about
individuals who are served by the medical care response capabilities
provided by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) through
the NDMS, and through other HHS medical personnel. The proposed system
will cover the collection, storage and sharing of personally
identifiable data in accordance with the Privacy Act.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
In a Federal Register Notice [72 FR 35052-35055] published on June
26, 2007, the HHS, ASPR, OPEO, NDMS proposed to establish the NDMS
Patient Treatment and Tracking Record System. This system will collect
demographic and health care data from individuals treated by the
medical response personnel of HHS and in particular, ASPR. The HHS
notice included reasons why this system is necessary as well as routine
uses for disclosures. HHS received comments from private, non-profit
organizations regarding the privacy protections that apply to
information about individuals treated by HHS medical personnel. The
comments suggested that the notice lacked clarity. The following
paragraphs summarize the comments, recommendations and the agency's
responses. We are also making other editorial changes to the System of
Records Notice at this time.
B. Comments and Responses
Comment: There was an overall comment that the notice lacked
adequate discussion of whether this system would be maintained in
compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
(HIPAA) Privacy Rule. It was recommended that compliance with the HIPAA
Privacy Rule be ``spelled out in the notice.''
Response: While ASPR, in operating NDMS, provides medical care to
individuals who are victims of disasters, emergencies, public health
emergencies, and events of national significance, ASPR is not a covered
entity or a health care component of a covered entity, and therefore is
not subject to the HIPAA Privacy Rule. Congress provided that these
HIPAA standards only apply to health care providers that transmit
health information electronically in connection with a transaction for
which the Secretary of HHS has adopted standards (i.e., the standards
provided for in the HIPAA Transactions Rule at 45 CFR Part 162). NDMS
health care providers, operating under ASPR auspices, do not engage in
these electronic transactions. However, the records within the NDMS
Patient Treatment and Tracking Records System are protected by the
Privacy Act.
Comment: The organizations which commented on the notice wanted to
make it clear that there will be ``no routine uses that are in
violation of HIPAA.''
Response: As explained above, while ASPR provides medical care to
individuals who are victims of disasters, emergencies, public health
emergencies, and events of national significance, ASPR is not subject
to the HIPAA Privacy Rule. The routine uses will comply with the
provisions of the Privacy Act.
Comment: There was a comment regarding clarifying the use of data
by NDMS's federal partners.
Response: The language has been clarified. Disclosure of personally
identifiable information between federal partners will be limited to
what is needed to support patient care and medical transport.
Comment: There is a concern that routine disclosure of patient
location, especially when the patient is a victim of domestic violence,
should be changed.
Response: Agree. The routine disclosure to family members regarding
patient location and status has been revised to state that disclosure
is not permitted when there is a reasonable belief that such
information could endanger the life, safety, health, or well-being of
the patient.
[[Page 16308]]
Revised Document
1. The Categories of Individuals Covered by the System section in
the System of Records Notice (SORN) is revised to include other HHS
personnel who may treat individuals. The section is revised as follows:
The individuals covered by the system are all persons and owners of
animals treated by NDMS and other HHS medical personnel when the NDMS
Disaster Medical Assistance Teams (DMATs), National Veterinary Response
Teams (NVRTs), or other HHS medical personnel are activated to respond
to emergency situations, or as a response to any other situation for
which they are activated.
2. The Purpose(s) section in the SORN is revised to include other
HHS personnel who may treat individuals. The first sentence of that
section is revised to read:
Medical and demographic information is collected on all patients seen
and/or treated by NDMS or other HHS personnel.
3. Routine Use No. 1 in the SORN is revised to clarify that it
refers to sharing information between NDMS partner agencies, and to
include a discussion, at the end of the routine use, of the
relationship between all of the NDMS partners regarding the use of
medical records as follows:
NDMS is a coordinated effort between HHS, the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), the Department of Defense (DoD), and the Department of
Veterans Affairs (VA). As such, the medical treatment and movement of
patients is a shared responsibility between these partnership agencies.
The medical and demographic information collected during the treatment
of a patient is shared with the partners to ensure that patients
treated through NDMS receive the appropriate level of health care. The
health information disclosed among the partners is limited to what is
needed for continuity of health care operations.
4. Routine Use No. 4 in the SORN is revised to include volunteers
as follows:
Disclosure to agency contractors, consultants, grantees, or volunteers
who have been engaged by the agency to assist in the performance of a
service related to this collection and who have a need to have access
to the records in order to perform the activity.
5. Routine Use No. 6 in the SORN is revised to include a
discussion, at the end of the routine use, of the circumstances when
the agency will not disclose the patient's location or status to family
members as follows:
Disclosure of a patient's location or status is not permitted when
there is a reasonable belief that disclosing such information could
endanger the life, safety, health, or well-being of the patient.
6. In the SORN, in the Policies and Practices for Storing,
Retrieving, Accessing, Retaining, and Disposing of Records in the
System, in the Disposition authority subsection, the first two
sentences are revised as follows:
Patient Care Forms or other Medical Records created by the Federal
Medical Station(s) (FMS) or by any component of HHS/ASPR inclusive of
NDMS during a response to an event while caring for victims of that
event are cutoff at the end of the response activity by the Federal
Medical Station(s) or HHS/ASPR component for a particular event. Cutoff
refers to breaking, or ending files at regular intervals, usually at
the close of a fiscal or calendar year, to permit their disposal or
transfer in complete blocks and, in this case, cutoff is at the end of
the response activity. The cutoff date marks the beginning of the
records retention period.
Dated: March 3, 2008.
Kevin Yeskey,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Director, Office of Preparedness and
Emergency Operations.
[FR Doc. E8-6238 Filed 3-26-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-37-P