Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 15499-15501 [E8-5867]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 57 / Monday, March 24, 2008 / Notices Can Receive Power.’’ This will allow the DOE to know when all customers affected by the incident will have their power restored. In Schedule 1, line 12 asked for the ‘‘Estimated Date/Time of Restoration.’’ That line has been taken off of the form, but an inquiry about the estimated restoration time has been added into Schedule 2 to be considered protected information. Line 9 of Schedule 1 which asked for a ‘‘Teleconference Number’’ has been deleted from the form. This line will not appear in the contact information lines which were moved to Schedule 2, discussed above. The data will continue to be filed with the DOE’s Emergency Operations Center. This DOE facility operates 24 hours daily, 7 days a week. Electronic submission is the preferred method of notification. Fax and telephone contact are also accepted. However, optional filing modes are being considered. The DOE is investigating an online submission process whereby the OE– 417 form could be filled via a secure internet data collection system. This system would allow companies to submit forms directly to the DOE without having to e-mail or fax completed forms into the DOE Emergency Operations Center. III. Request for Comments Prospective respondents and other interested parties should comment on the actions discussed in item II. The following guidelines are provided to assist in the preparation of comments. mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES General Issues A. Is the proposed collection of information necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency and does the information have practical utility? Practical utility is defined as the actual usefulness of information to or for an agency, taking into account its accuracy, adequacy, reliability, timeliness, and the agency’s ability to process the information it collects. B. What enhancements can be made to the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected? As a Potential Respondent to the Request for Information A. What actions could be taken to help ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of the information to be collected? B. Are the instructions and definitions clear and sufficient? If not, which instructions need clarification? C. Can the information be submitted by the due date? VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:33 Mar 21, 2008 Jkt 214001 D. Public reporting burden for this collection is estimated to average 10 minutes for the Emergency Incident Report (Schedule 1, Part A) that is to be filed within 1 hour; the overall public reporting burden for the form is estimated at 2 hours to cover any detailed reporting in the Normal/Update Report (Schedule 1, Part B and Schedule 2) which is filed later (up to 48 hours), if required. The estimated burden includes the total time necessary to provide the requested information. In your opinion, how accurate is this estimate? E. The agency estimates that the only cost to a respondent is for the time it will take to complete the collection. Will a respondent incur any start-up costs for reporting, or any recurring annual costs for operation, maintenance, and purchase of services associated with the information collection? F. What additional actions could be taken to minimize the burden of this collection of information? Such actions may involve the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. G. Does any other Federal, State, or local agency collect similar information? If so, specify the agency, the data element(s), and the methods of collection. As a Potential User of the Information To Be Collected A. What actions could be taken to help ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of the information disseminated? B. Is the information useful at the levels of detail to be collected? C. For what purpose(s) would the information be used? Be specific. D. Are there alternate sources for the information and are they useful? If so, what are their weaknesses and/or strengths? Please refer to the proposed forms and instructions for more information about the purpose, who must report, when to report, where to submit, the elements to be reported, detailed instructions, provisions for confidentiality, and uses (including possible nonstatistical uses) of the information. For instructions on obtaining materials, see the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval of the form. They also will become a matter of public record. Statutory Authority: Section 3507(h)(1) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974 (Pub. L. PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 15499 93–275, 15 U.S.C. 761 et seq.), and the DOE Organization Act (Pub. L. 95–91, 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.). Issued in Washington, DC, March 19, 2008. Jay H. Casselberry, Agency Clearance Officer, Energy Information Administration. [FR Doc. E8–5865 Filed 3–21–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Energy Information Administration Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request Energy Information Administration (EIA), Department of Energy (DOE). ACTION: Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The EIA is soliciting comments on the proposed three-year extension to the EIA–882T, ‘‘Generic Clearance for Questionnaire Testing, Evaluation, and Research.’’ DATES: Comments must be filed by May 23, 2008. If you anticipate difficulty in submitting comments within that period, contact the person listed below as soon as possible. ADDRESSES: Send comments to Grace Sutherland. To ensure receipt of the comments by the due date, submission by FAX (202–287–1705) or e-mail (grace.sutherland@eia.doe.gov) is recommended. The mailing address is Statistics and Methods Group, EI–70, Forrestal Building, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC 20585. Alternatively, Grace Sutherland may be contacted by telephone at 202–586– 6264. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of any forms and instructions should be directed to Grace Sutherland at the address listed above. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background II. Current Actions III. Request for Comments I. Background The Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974 (Pub. L. No. 93–275, 15 U.S.C. 761 et seq.) and the DOE Organization Act (Pub. L. No. 95–91, 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.) require the EIA to carry out a centralized, comprehensive, and unified energy information program. This program collects, evaluates, assembles, analyzes, and E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM 24MRN1 mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES 15500 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 57 / Monday, March 24, 2008 / Notices disseminates information on energy resource reserves, production, demand, technology, and related economic and statistical information. This information is used to assess the adequacy of energy resources to meet near and longer term domestic demands. The EIA, as part of its effort to comply with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), provides the general public and other Federal agencies with opportunities to comment on collections of energy information conducted by or in conjunction with the EIA. Any comments received help the EIA to prepare data requests that maximize the utility of the information collected, and to assess the impact of collection requirements on the public. Also, the EIA will later seek approval of this collection of information by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under Section 3507(a) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Form EIA–882T is a generic clearance, which is a plan for conducting one or more customer surveys. A generic clearance is considered by DOE only when DOE is able to demonstrate that there is a need for multiple, similar collections, but that the specifics of each collection cannot be determined until shortly before the data are to be collected. Form EIA–882T is used to conduct various projects, including pretest/pilot surveys (in-person interviews, telephone interviews, mail questionnaires, and electronic reporting options), focus groups, and cognitive interviews. The information collections that would be conducted as part of this approval will facilitate EIA’s use of techniques to improve our current information collections and to develop new collections. Other goals are to reduce respondent burden and improve the quality of the information collected. The number and type of respondents varies depending upon the activities being conducted. Form EIA–882T was last extended for three years on August 17, 2005, and expires August 31, 2008. The information collections will include: 1. Pretests. Pretest methods will include face-to-face interviews, telephone interviews, mail questionnaires, and electronic questionnaires. Pretests conducted will generally be methodological studies of limited size, normally involving either purposive or statistically representative samples. They will include a variety of surveys, the exact nature and sample designs will be determined at the time of development of the pretests. The samples will be designed to clarify particular issues rather than to be VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:33 Mar 21, 2008 Jkt 214001 representative of the universe of interest. Collection may be on the basis of convenience, e.g., limited to specific geographic locations. The needs of a particular sample will vary based on the content of the information collection being tested, but the selection of sample cases will be made using sound statistical procedures. 2. Pilot surveys. Pilot surveys will generally be methodological studies of limited size, but will always employ statistically representative samples. The pilot surveys will replicate components of the methodological design, sampling procedures (where possible), and questionnaires of a full-scale survey. Pilot surveys may be utilized when EIA is undertaking a complete revamping of a survey methodology (e.g., moving to computer-assisted information collections) or when EIA is undertaking a new information collection. 3. Focus groups. Focus groups involve group sessions guided by a monitor who follows a topical outline containing questions or topics focused on a particular issue, rather than adhering to a standardized questionnaire. Focus groups are useful for surfacing and exploring issues. Focus groups are typically used with specific groups of stakeholders. 4. Cognitive interviews. Cognitive interviews are one-on-one interviews in which a respondent is typically asked to ‘‘think aloud’’ as he or she answers survey questions, reads survey materials, or completes other activities as part of a survey process. A number of different techniques may be involved, including asking respondents to paraphrase questions, probing questions to determine how respondents come up with their answers, and similar inquiries. The objective is to identify problems of ambiguity, misunderstanding, or other difficulties respondents have answering questions. This may be used as the first stage of questionnaire development. A wide variety of uses are made of the data obtained through this generic clearance. These projects represent significant strides in our efforts to improve the pretesting of EIA surveys. As EIA gains more experience, we are broadening our involvement in testing, evaluation, and research, including working with staff at the National Science Foundation. II. Current Actions EIA plans to request a three-year extension of the OMB approval for this collection. No changes are being proposed to the types of surveys being conducted under the generic clearance. For each information collection that EIA PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 proposes to undertake under this generic clearance, OMB will be notified at least two weeks in advance, and provided with an information copy of the collection instrument and all other materials describing the testing activity. EIA will only undertake a collection if OMB does not object to EIA’s proposal. III. Request for Comments Prospective respondents and other interested parties should comment on the actions discussed in item II. The following guidelines are provided to assist in the preparation of comments. General Issues A. Is the proposed collection of information necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency and does the information have practical utility? Practical utility is defined as the actual usefulness of information to or for an agency, taking into account its accuracy, adequacy, reliability, timeliness, and the agency’s ability to process the information it collects. B. What enhancements can be made to the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected? As a Potential Respondent to the Request for Information A. What actions could be taken to help ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of the information to be collected? B. Public reporting burden for this collection is estimated to average .25 hours (15 minutes) per response. The estimated burden includes the total time necessary to provide the requested information. In your opinion, how accurate is this estimate? C. The agency estimates that the only cost to a respondent is for the time it will take to complete the collection. Will a respondent incur any start-up costs for reporting, or any recurring annual costs for operation, maintenance, and purchase of services associated with the information collection? As a Potential User of the Information To Be Collected A. What actions could be taken to help ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of the information disseminated? Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval of the form. They also will become a matter of public record. Statutory Authority: Section 3507(h)(1) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. No. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974 (Pub. L. E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM 24MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 57 / Monday, March 24, 2008 / Notices No. 93–275, 15 U.S.C. 761 et seq.), and the DOE Organization Act (Pub. L. No. 95–91, 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.). Issued in Washington, DC, March 19, 2008. Jay H. Casselberry, Agency Clearance Officer, Energy Information Administration. [FR Doc. E8–5867 Filed 3–21–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Project No. 2413–101] Georgia Power Company; Notice of Amendment of License and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Protests mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES March 18, 2008. Take notice that the following application has been filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection: a. Application Type: Non-Project Use of Project Lands and Waters. b. Project No.: 2413–101. c. Date filed: March 3, 2008. d. Applicant: Georgia Power Company. e. Name of Project: Wallace Hydroelectric Project. f. Location: The project is located on Lake Oconee in Morgan County, Georgia. The project does not occupy federal lands. g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)–825(r) and §§ 799 and 801. h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Lee Glenn, Georgia Power Company, 125 Wallace Dam Road, NE., Eatonton, GA 31024, (706) 485–8704. i. FERC Contact: Christopher Yeakel at 202–502–8132, or e-mail christopher.yeakel@ferc.gov. j. Deadline for Filing Comments and or Motions: April 18, 2008. All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington DC 20426. Please include the project number (P– 2413–101) on any comments or motions filed. Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission’s Web site under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link. The Commission strongly encourages efilings. The Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure require all intervenors filing documents with the Commission VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:33 Mar 21, 2008 Jkt 214001 to serve a copy of that document on each person whose name appears on the official service list for the project. Further, if an intervenor files comments or documents with the Commission relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document on that resource agency. A copy of any motion to intervene must also be served upon each representative of the Applicant specified in the particular application. k. Description of Application: The licensee requests Commission approval to allow Patrick Malloy Communities to construct dock facilities with 90 watercraft slips and 975 feet of seawall for a private residential development along the shoreline of the Apalachee River section of Lake Oconee in Morgan County, Georgia. There would be a total of nine floating docks each with a capacity of 10 watercraft. Each dock would consist of a 6 foot by 20 foot walkway placed perpendicular to the center of a 6 foot by 113 foot walkway with five 5 foot by 24 foot fingers extending off one side. The proposed facility would occupy 0.29 acre of project waters and 2.98 acres of project lands, and would extend along 3151 linear feet of shoreline. l. Location of Application: A copy of the application is available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission’s Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426, or by calling (202) 502–8371. This filing may also be viewed on the Commission’s Web site at https://www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. You may also register online at: https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, call 1–866–208–3676 or e-mail FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, for TTY, call (202) 502–8659. A copy is also available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item (h) above. m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission’s mailing list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission. n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene—Anyone may submit comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211, .214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission will consider all PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 15501 protests or other comments filed, but only those who file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission’s Rules may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified comment date for the particular application. o. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents—Any filings must bear in all capital letters the title ‘‘COMMENTS’’, ‘‘RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TERMS AND CONDITIONS’’, ‘‘PROTEST’’, OR ‘‘MOTION TO INTERVENE’’, as applicable, and the Project Number of the particular application to which the filing refers. A copy of any motion to intervene must also be served upon each representative of the Applicant specified in the particular application. p. Agency Comments—Federal, state, and local agencies are invited to file comments on the described application. A copy of the application may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. If an agency does not file comments within the time specified for filing comments, it will be presumed to have no comments. One copy of an agency’s comments must also be sent to the Applicant’s representatives. q. Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission’s Web site at: https://www.ferc.gov under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary. [FR Doc. E8–5850 Filed 3–21–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. RP08–218–000] Gulfstream Natural Gas System, L.L.C.; Notice of Amendment To Petition for Temporary Waiver of Tariff Provisions and Request for Expedited Action March 14, 2008. Take notice that on March 13, 2008, Gulfstream Natural Gas System, L.L.C. (Gulfstream) tendered for filing an amendment in the referenced docket to its February 28, 2008 Petition for Temporary Waiver of Tariff Provisions. Gulfstream states that the purpose of the amendment is to change the period over which its temporary waiver with respect to loan service will be E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM 24MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 57 (Monday, March 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15499-15501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-5867]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Energy Information Administration


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Energy Information Administration (EIA), Department of Energy 
(DOE).

ACTION: Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EIA is soliciting comments on the proposed three-year 
extension to the EIA-882T, ``Generic Clearance for Questionnaire 
Testing, Evaluation, and Research.''

DATES: Comments must be filed by May 23, 2008. If you anticipate 
difficulty in submitting comments within that period, contact the 
person listed below as soon as possible.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to Grace Sutherland. To ensure receipt of the 
comments by the due date, submission by FAX (202-287-1705) or e-mail 
(grace.sutherland@eia.doe.gov) is recommended. The mailing address is 
Statistics and Methods Group, EI-70, Forrestal Building, U.S. 
Department of Energy, Washington, DC 20585. Alternatively, Grace 
Sutherland may be contacted by telephone at 202-586-6264.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of any forms and instructions should be directed to Grace 
Sutherland at the address listed above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background
II. Current Actions
III. Request for Comments

I. Background

    The Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974 (Pub. L. No. 93-275, 
15 U.S.C. 761 et seq.) and the DOE Organization Act (Pub. L. No. 95-91, 
42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.) require the EIA to carry out a centralized, 
comprehensive, and unified energy information program. This program 
collects, evaluates, assembles, analyzes, and

[[Page 15500]]

disseminates information on energy resource reserves, production, 
demand, technology, and related economic and statistical information. 
This information is used to assess the adequacy of energy resources to 
meet near and longer term domestic demands.
    The EIA, as part of its effort to comply with the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), provides 
the general public and other Federal agencies with opportunities to 
comment on collections of energy information conducted by or in 
conjunction with the EIA. Any comments received help the EIA to prepare 
data requests that maximize the utility of the information collected, 
and to assess the impact of collection requirements on the public. 
Also, the EIA will later seek approval of this collection of 
information by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under Section 
3507(a) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    Form EIA-882T is a generic clearance, which is a plan for 
conducting one or more customer surveys. A generic clearance is 
considered by DOE only when DOE is able to demonstrate that there is a 
need for multiple, similar collections, but that the specifics of each 
collection cannot be determined until shortly before the data are to be 
collected. Form EIA-882T is used to conduct various projects, including 
pretest/pilot surveys (in-person interviews, telephone interviews, mail 
questionnaires, and electronic reporting options), focus groups, and 
cognitive interviews. The information collections that would be 
conducted as part of this approval will facilitate EIA's use of 
techniques to improve our current information collections and to 
develop new collections. Other goals are to reduce respondent burden 
and improve the quality of the information collected. The number and 
type of respondents varies depending upon the activities being 
conducted. Form EIA-882T was last extended for three years on August 
17, 2005, and expires August 31, 2008.
    The information collections will include:
    1. Pretests. Pretest methods will include face-to-face interviews, 
telephone interviews, mail questionnaires, and electronic 
questionnaires. Pretests conducted will generally be methodological 
studies of limited size, normally involving either purposive or 
statistically representative samples. They will include a variety of 
surveys, the exact nature and sample designs will be determined at the 
time of development of the pretests. The samples will be designed to 
clarify particular issues rather than to be representative of the 
universe of interest. Collection may be on the basis of convenience, 
e.g., limited to specific geographic locations. The needs of a 
particular sample will vary based on the content of the information 
collection being tested, but the selection of sample cases will be made 
using sound statistical procedures.
    2. Pilot surveys. Pilot surveys will generally be methodological 
studies of limited size, but will always employ statistically 
representative samples. The pilot surveys will replicate components of 
the methodological design, sampling procedures (where possible), and 
questionnaires of a full-scale survey. Pilot surveys may be utilized 
when EIA is undertaking a complete revamping of a survey methodology 
(e.g., moving to computer-assisted information collections) or when EIA 
is undertaking a new information collection.
    3. Focus groups. Focus groups involve group sessions guided by a 
monitor who follows a topical outline containing questions or topics 
focused on a particular issue, rather than adhering to a standardized 
questionnaire. Focus groups are useful for surfacing and exploring 
issues. Focus groups are typically used with specific groups of 
stakeholders.
    4. Cognitive interviews. Cognitive interviews are one-on-one 
interviews in which a respondent is typically asked to ``think aloud'' 
as he or she answers survey questions, reads survey materials, or 
completes other activities as part of a survey process. A number of 
different techniques may be involved, including asking respondents to 
paraphrase questions, probing questions to determine how respondents 
come up with their answers, and similar inquiries. The objective is to 
identify problems of ambiguity, misunderstanding, or other difficulties 
respondents have answering questions. This may be used as the first 
stage of questionnaire development.
    A wide variety of uses are made of the data obtained through this 
generic clearance. These projects represent significant strides in our 
efforts to improve the pretesting of EIA surveys. As EIA gains more 
experience, we are broadening our involvement in testing, evaluation, 
and research, including working with staff at the National Science 
Foundation.

II. Current Actions

    EIA plans to request a three-year extension of the OMB approval for 
this collection. No changes are being proposed to the types of surveys 
being conducted under the generic clearance. For each information 
collection that EIA proposes to undertake under this generic clearance, 
OMB will be notified at least two weeks in advance, and provided with 
an information copy of the collection instrument and all other 
materials describing the testing activity. EIA will only undertake a 
collection if OMB does not object to EIA's proposal.

III. Request for Comments

    Prospective respondents and other interested parties should comment 
on the actions discussed in item II. The following guidelines are 
provided to assist in the preparation of comments.

General Issues

    A. Is the proposed collection of information necessary for the 
proper performance of the functions of the agency and does the 
information have practical utility? Practical utility is defined as the 
actual usefulness of information to or for an agency, taking into 
account its accuracy, adequacy, reliability, timeliness, and the 
agency's ability to process the information it collects.
    B. What enhancements can be made to the quality, utility, and 
clarity of the information to be collected?

As a Potential Respondent to the Request for Information

    A. What actions could be taken to help ensure and maximize the 
quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of the information to be 
collected?
    B. Public reporting burden for this collection is estimated to 
average .25 hours (15 minutes) per response. The estimated burden 
includes the total time necessary to provide the requested information. 
In your opinion, how accurate is this estimate?
    C. The agency estimates that the only cost to a respondent is for 
the time it will take to complete the collection. Will a respondent 
incur any start-up costs for reporting, or any recurring annual costs 
for operation, maintenance, and purchase of services associated with 
the information collection?

As a Potential User of the Information To Be Collected

    A. What actions could be taken to help ensure and maximize the 
quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of the information 
disseminated?
    Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized 
and/or included in the request for OMB approval of the form. They also 
will become a matter of public record.

    Statutory Authority: Section 3507(h)(1) of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. No. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), 
Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974 (Pub. L.

[[Page 15501]]

No. 93-275, 15 U.S.C. 761 et seq.), and the DOE Organization Act 
(Pub. L. No. 95-91, 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.).

    Issued in Washington, DC, March 19, 2008.
Jay H. Casselberry,
Agency Clearance Officer, Energy Information Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-5867 Filed 3-21-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.