Notice of Renewal of Facility License No. R-88; Kansas State University TRIGA Research Reactor, 15012-15013 [E8-5643]
Download as PDF
15012
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 55 / Thursday, March 20, 2008 / Notices
impacts because the proposed
exemption is an administrative action
that will not affect the physical design
or operation of the Diablo Canyon ISFSI.
Therefore, there are no radiological or
non-radiological impacts from a onetime delay in submitting the updated
FSAR, and the staff finds that the
proposed exemption will not have any
significant environmental impact.
Environmental Impacts of the
Alternative to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed
action, the staff considered denial of the
proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘no-action’’
alternative). Approval or denial of the
exemption request would result in no
change in the environmental impacts
described in the October 24, 2003 EA
and its Supplement. Therefore, the
environmental impacts of the proposed
action and the alternative action are
similar.
Conclusion
The staff has reviewed the exemption
request submitted by PG&E and has
determined that allowing the licensee to
delay the submittal of the updated Final
Safety Analysis Report for the Diablo
Canyon ISFSI by no more than
approximately 100 days beyond the date
required by 10 CFR 72.70(c)(6) is an
administrative change, and would have
no significant effect on the human
environment.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Agencies and Persons Consulted
On March 10, 2008, Ms. Barbara
Byron of the California Energy
Commission was contacted regarding
the environmental assessment for the
proposed exemption and Ms. Byron had
no comments. The NRC staff has
determined that the proposed action is
solely of a procedural nature and will
not affect listed species or critical
habitat. Therefore, no consultation is
required under Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act. The NRC staff
has also determined that the proposed
action is not the type of activity that has
the potential to cause effects on historic
properties, assuming such historic
properties were present at the Diablo
Canyon ISFSI. Therefore, no
consultation is required under Section
106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
The environmental impacts of the
proposed action have been reviewed in
accordance with the requirements set
forth in 10 CFR part 51. Based upon the
foregoing environmental assessment, the
NRC finds that the proposed action of
granting the exemption from 10 CFR
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:44 Mar 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
72.70(c)(6), so that PG&E may delay the
submittal of the updated FSAR for the
Diablo Canyon ISFSI, will not have a
significant effect on the quality of the
human environment. Accordingly,
pursuant to 10 CFR 50.31 and 51.119(a),
the NRC has determined that a Final
Finding of No Significant Impact is
appropriate, and that an environmental
impact statement for the proposed
exemption is not necessary.
IV. Further Information
PG&E’s application for exemption is
available electronically at the NRC’s
Electronic Reading Room at https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
From this site, you can access the NRC’s
Agencywide Document Access and
Management System (ADAMS), which
provides text and image files of NRC’s
public documents. The ADAMS
Accession number for the exemption
request is ML080290634.
If you do not have access to ADAMS,
or if there are problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS, contact
the NRC Public Document Room (PDR)
Reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
These documents may also be viewed
electronically on the public computers
located at the NRC’s PDR, O–1F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR
reproduction contractor will copy
documents for a fee.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day
of March, 2008.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
James R. Hall,
Senior Project Manager, Licensing Branch,
Division of Spent Fuel Storage and
Transportation, Office of Nuclear Material
Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. E8–5649 Filed 3–19–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–188]
Notice of Renewal of Facility License
No. R–88; Kansas State University
TRIGA Research Reactor
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (the Commission) has
issued renewed Facility License No. R–
88 for the Kansas State University (the
licensee), for operation of the Kansas
State University TRIGA Research
Reactor Facility located in Manhattan,
Kansas.
The facility is a research reactor that
has been operating at a power level not
in excess of 250 kilowatts (thermal). The
renewed Facility License No. R–88
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
allows operation at an increased power
level not in excess of 1,250 kilowatts
(thermal), and will expire twenty years
from its effective date.
The renewed license complies with
the standards and requirements of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended
(the Act), and the Commission’s rules
and regulations. The Commission has
made appropriate findings as required
by the Act and the Commission’s
regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I. Those
findings are set forth in the license
renewal. Opportunity for hearing was
afforded in the notice of the proposed
issuance of this renewal in the Federal
Register on October 6, 2005 (70 FR
58487) and on August 2, 2006 (71 FR
43816). No request for a hearing or
petition for leave to intervene was filed
following notice of the proposed action.
Continued operation of the reactor
will not require alteration of buildings
or structures, will not lead to significant
changes in effluents released from the
facility to the environment, will not
increase the probability or consequences
of accidents, and will not involve any
unresolved issues concerning
alternative uses of available resources.
Based on the foregoing and on the
Environmental Assessment, the
Commission concludes that renewal of
the license and power increase will not
results in any significant environmental
impacts.
The Commission has prepared a
‘‘Safety Evaluation Report Related to the
Renewal of the Facility License for the
TRIGA Research Reactor at the Kansas
State University’’ for the renewal of
Facility License No. R–88 and has,
based on that evaluation, concluded that
the facility can continue to be operated
by the licensee without endangering the
health and safety of the public.
The Commission also prepared an
Environmental Assessment which was
published in the Federal Register on
February 26, 2008 (73 FR 10308) for the
renewal of Facility License No. R–88
and has concluded that this action will
not have a significant effect on the
quality of the human environment.
For further details with respect to this
action, see: (1) The application for
amendment dated September 12, 2002,
as supplemented on November 11, 2002,
November 13, 2002, December 21, 2004,
July 6, 2005, September 27, 2005, March
20, 2006, March 30, 2006, June 28, 2006,
September 28, 2006, May 17, 2007, and
June 4, 2007, September 12, 2007,
October 11, 2007, and February 6, 2008;
(2) Renewal of Facility License No. R–
88; (3) the related Safety Evaluation
Report; and (4) the Environmental
Assessment dated February 20, 2008.
Documents may be examined, and/or
E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM
20MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 55 / Thursday, March 20, 2008 / Notices
copied for a fee, at the NRC’s Public
Document Room, located at One White
Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first
floor), Rockville, Maryland. Publicly
available records will be accessible
electronically from the Agencywide
Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS) Public Electronic
Reading Room on the Internet at NRC
Web site, https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html.
If you do not have access to ADAMS
or if there are problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS, contact
the PDR Reference staff at 1–800–397–
4209, 301–415–4737 or by e-mail to
pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 13th day
of March, 2008.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Daniel S. Collins,
Chief, Research and Test Reactors Branch
A, Division of Policy and Rulemaking, Office
of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. E8–5643 Filed 3–19–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
Privacy Act of 1974; Notice of
Amended System of Records
Notice to amend and republish
system of records.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of
the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a),
the Office of Personnel Management
(OPM) is giving notice that it proposes
to republish an amended system of
records, OPM/Central-1, due to changes
in technology by Retirement Systems
Modernization (RSM). This system of
records is an integrated application that
works from one central database that
allows OPM designated employees and
contractors to access the records on a
need to know basis in accordance with
OPM and Federal rules, regulations and
safeguard procedures for personally
identifiable information. RSM will
enhance the system’s functionality to
enable Federal employees and retirees
to access personal and benefits-related
information. This notice proposes to
amend and republish an existing
internal system of records.
DATE: The changes will be effective
April 21, 2008, without further notice
unless comments are received that
would result in a contrary
determination.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Office of Personnel Management, ATTN:
Marc Flaster, Chief, Support Group,
Center for Retirement and Insurance
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:44 Mar 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
Services, 1900 E Street, NW., Room
3313, Washington, DC 20415–7900.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sharon Glick (412) 657–5013.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice to
amend and republish system of records.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of
the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a),
the Office of Personnel Management
(OPM) is giving notice that it proposes
to republish an amended system of
records, OPM/Central-1, due to changes
in technology by Retirement Systems
Modernization (RSM). RSM is a strategic
initiative of OPM to improve quality
and timeliness of services to individuals
covered by the Civil Service Retirement
System (CSRS) and the Federal
Employees’ Retirement System (FERS),
the Federal Employees’ Group Life
Insurance Program (FEGLI), and the
Federal Employees Health Benefits
Program (FEHBP) by modernizing
business practices and technology that
support the programs. The RSM
program will transform the retirement
process, and health and life insurance
elections, by devising more efficient and
effective business systems to respond to
increased customer demand for higher
levels of customer service and online
self-service tools. This system of records
reflects the republishing of the SORN
from October 1999, as amended May
2000, inclusion of the prefatory uses as
published in 1996 and the addition of
two new routine uses.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Linda M. Springer,
Director.
SYSTEM NAME:
Civil Service Retirement and
Insurance Records.
SYSTEM LOCATION:
Deputy Associate Director, Center for
Retirement and Insurance Services,
Office of Personnel Management (OPM),
1900 E Street, NW., Washington, DC
20415–0001. Certain records pertaining
to State income tax withholdings from
annuitant payments are located with
State Taxing Offices. Certain
information concerning enrollment/
change in enrollment in a health plan
under the Federal Employees Health
Benefits Program (FEHBP) may be
located at other agencies. Certain
records pertaining to overpayments
must be forwarded to the Department of
the Treasury for collection activity.
Certain records pertaining to enrollment
in a Preauthorized Debit Program (PAD)
for sending recurring remittances to
OPM for service credit and voluntary
contributions accounts are maintained
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15013
with a lockbox bank, which operates the
PAD program for OPM.
CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE
SYSTEM:
a. Former Federal employees and
members of Congress who performed
service subject to the Civil Service
Retirement System (CSRS) or Federal
Employees’ Retirement System (FERS).
b. Current Federal employees who
have:
1. Performed Federal service subject
to the CSRS or FERS other than with
their present agency; or
2. Had data converted to the OPM
Retirement Systems Modernization
Program; or
3. Filed a designation of beneficiary
for benefits payable under the CSRS; or
4. Requested OPM to review a claim
for health benefits made under the
FEHBP; or
5. Enrolled/changed enrollment in a
plan under the FEHBP; or
6. Filed a service credit application in
connection with former Federal service;
or
7. Filed an application for disability
retirement with OPM and are awaiting
final decision, or whose disability
retirement application has been
disapproved by OPM.
c. Former Federal employees who
died subject to or who retired under the
CSRS or FERS, or their surviving
spouses, and/or children who have
received or are receiving CSRS or FERS
benefits and/or benefits under the
Federal Employees’ Group Life
Insurance (FEGLI) Program, or Federal
Employees Health Benefits Program
(FEHBP).
d. Former Federal employees who
died subject to or who retired under a
Federal Government retirement system
other than CSRS or FERS, or their
surviving spouses and/or children, who
have received or are receiving benefits
from FEGLI and/or FEHBP.
e. Applicants for Federal employment
found unsuitable for employment on
medical grounds.
f. Former spouses of Federal
employees who have received or are
receiving CSRS or FERS benefits, or
who have filed a court order awarding
future benefits.
CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
This system comprises those
retirement service history records of
employee’s service in the Federal
Government from their current
employing agency if the employee has
been converted to the Retirement
Systems Modernization Program and/or
an agency other than for the agency in
which they may presently be employed.
E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM
20MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 55 (Thursday, March 20, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15012-15013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-5643]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-188]
Notice of Renewal of Facility License No. R-88; Kansas State
University TRIGA Research Reactor
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has issued
renewed Facility License No. R-88 for the Kansas State University (the
licensee), for operation of the Kansas State University TRIGA Research
Reactor Facility located in Manhattan, Kansas.
The facility is a research reactor that has been operating at a
power level not in excess of 250 kilowatts (thermal). The renewed
Facility License No. R-88 allows operation at an increased power level
not in excess of 1,250 kilowatts (thermal), and will expire twenty
years from its effective date.
The renewed license complies with the standards and requirements of
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the
Commission's rules and regulations. The Commission has made appropriate
findings as required by the Act and the Commission's regulations in 10
CFR Chapter I. Those findings are set forth in the license renewal.
Opportunity for hearing was afforded in the notice of the proposed
issuance of this renewal in the Federal Register on October 6, 2005 (70
FR 58487) and on August 2, 2006 (71 FR 43816). No request for a hearing
or petition for leave to intervene was filed following notice of the
proposed action.
Continued operation of the reactor will not require alteration of
buildings or structures, will not lead to significant changes in
effluents released from the facility to the environment, will not
increase the probability or consequences of accidents, and will not
involve any unresolved issues concerning alternative uses of available
resources. Based on the foregoing and on the Environmental Assessment,
the Commission concludes that renewal of the license and power increase
will not results in any significant environmental impacts.
The Commission has prepared a ``Safety Evaluation Report Related to
the Renewal of the Facility License for the TRIGA Research Reactor at
the Kansas State University'' for the renewal of Facility License No.
R-88 and has, based on that evaluation, concluded that the facility can
continue to be operated by the licensee without endangering the health
and safety of the public.
The Commission also prepared an Environmental Assessment which was
published in the Federal Register on February 26, 2008 (73 FR 10308)
for the renewal of Facility License No. R-88 and has concluded that
this action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the
human environment.
For further details with respect to this action, see: (1) The
application for amendment dated September 12, 2002, as supplemented on
November 11, 2002, November 13, 2002, December 21, 2004, July 6, 2005,
September 27, 2005, March 20, 2006, March 30, 2006, June 28, 2006,
September 28, 2006, May 17, 2007, and June 4, 2007, September 12, 2007,
October 11, 2007, and February 6, 2008; (2) Renewal of Facility License
No. R-88; (3) the related Safety Evaluation Report; and (4) the
Environmental Assessment dated February 20, 2008. Documents may be
examined, and/or
[[Page 15013]]
copied for a fee, at the NRC's Public Document Room, located at One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville,
Maryland. Publicly available records will be accessible electronically
from the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
Public Electronic Reading Room on the Internet at NRC Web site, https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are problems in
accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the PDR Reference
staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737 or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 13th day of March, 2008.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Daniel S. Collins,
Chief, Research and Test Reactors Branch A, Division of Policy and
Rulemaking, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. E8-5643 Filed 3-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P