Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10-10 and DC-10-10F Airplanes, Model DC-10-15 Airplanes, Model DC-10-30 and DC-10-30F (KC-10A and KDC-10) Airplanes, Model DC-10-40 and DC-10-40F Airplanes, Model MD-10-10F and MD-10-30F Airplanes, and Model MD-11 and MD-11F Airplanes, 14673-14676 [E8-5145]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 19, 2008 / Rules and Regulations are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to service. (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120–0056. 14673 Related Information (h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2006– 0282, dated September 12, 2006; and the service information in Table 1 of this AD; for related information. TABLE 1.—SERVICE INFORMATION Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–0177 A300–57–0222 A300–57–6029 A300–57–6064 Revision level .......................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................... Material Incorporated by Reference this service information under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. (3) You may review copies at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind (i) You must use the service information specified in Table 2 of this AD to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of 05 01 06 04 Date March March March March 23, 2007. 13, 2006. 23, 2007. 9, 2006. Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741–6030, or go to: https:// www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. TABLE 2.—MATERIAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Airbus Service Bulletin Revision level A300–57–0177 .......................................................................................................................................... A300–57–6029 .......................................................................................................................................... Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 7, 2008. Ali Bahrami, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E8–5149 Filed 3–18–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2007–0201; Directorate Identifier 2007–NM–163–AD; Amendment 39–15433; AD 2008–06–21] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC–10–10 and DC–10– 10F Airplanes, Model DC–10–15 Airplanes, Model DC–10–30 and DC– 10–30F (KC–10A and KDC–10) Airplanes, Model DC–10–40 and DC– 10–40F Airplanes, Model MD–10–10F and MD–10–30F Airplanes, and Model MD–11 and MD–11F Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES AGENCY: SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all McDonnell Douglas airplane models identified above. This AD requires VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:13 Mar 18, 2008 Jkt 214001 revising the FAA-approved maintenance program, or the Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) section of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness, as applicable, to incorporate new AWLs for fuel tank systems to satisfy Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 requirements. For certain airplanes, this AD also requires the initial accomplishment of a certain repetitive AWL inspection to phase in that inspection, and repair if necessary. This AD results from a design review of the fuel tank systems. We are issuing this AD to prevent the potential for ignition sources inside fuel tanks caused by latent failures, alterations, repairs, or maintenance actions, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane. DATES: This AD is effective April 23, 2008. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of April 23, 2008. ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and Service Management, Dept. C1–L5A (D800–0024). PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 05 06 Date March 23, 2007. March 23, 2007. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The address for the Docket Office (telephone 800–647–5527) is the Document Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip C. Kush, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM–140L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712–4137; telephone (562) 627–5263; fax (562) 627–5210. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Discussion We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to all McDonnell Douglas Model DC–10–10 and DC–10–10F airplanes, Model DC– 10–15 airplanes, Model DC–10–30 and DC–10–30F (KC–10A and KDC–10) E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM 19MRR1 14674 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 19, 2008 / Rules and Regulations airplanes, Model DC–10–40 and DC–10– 40F airplanes, Model MD–10–10F and MD–10–30F airplanes, and Model MD– 11 and MD–11F airplanes. That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on November 19, 2007 (72 FR 64957). That NPRM proposed to require revising the FAA-approved maintenance program, or the Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) section of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness, as applicable, to incorporate new AWLs for fuel tank systems to satisfy Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 requirements. For certain airplanes, that NPRM also proposed to require the initial accomplishment of a certain repetitive AWL inspection to phase in that inspection, and repair if necessary. MDC–02K1003 must be revised to reflect modifications, alterations, or repairs that are initiated by an operator and outside of Boeing’s design cognizance and responsibility. Boeing requests that we revise Note 1 as follows: • Replace the words ‘‘revision to’’ with ‘‘deviation from’’ in the last sentence. • Delete the words ‘‘(g), (h), or’’ and ‘‘as applicable’’ from the last sentence. As stated previously, we have simplified the language in Note 1 of this AD for standardization with other similar ADs. The language the commenter requests we change does not appear in the revised note; therefore, no additional change to this AD is necessary in this regard. Comments We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. We considered the comments received from the two commenters. Request To Clarify Approval of Component Maintenance Manual (CMM) Changes Boeing requests that we revise the heading and certain wording for the ‘‘Changes to Component Maintenance Manuals (CMMs) Cited in Fuel Tank System AWLs’’ section of the NPRM. Boeing believes that section was intended to address situations where an operator chooses to deviate from the procedures in the CMM referenced in Report MDC–02K1003. Boeing states that its proposed changes are intended to clarify that only deviations proposed by an operator require approval of the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, FAA. Boeing further states that wording in the NPRM could be interpreted to mean that approval of a CMM in its entirety, including any future CMM revisions by Boeing, would require direct approval of the Manager, Los Angeles, ACO, or governing regulatory authority. Specifically, Boeing requests that we revise that section as follows: • Revise the heading to ‘‘Deviations from Component Maintenance Manuals (CMMs) Cited in Fuel Tank System AWLs.’’ • Revise the third sentence to state that the Manager, Los Angeles ACO, must approve ‘‘any deviations from’’ the CMMs ‘‘as defined in Report MDC– 02K1003.’’ • Replace the words ‘‘revision of’’ with ‘‘deviation from’’ in the fourth sentence. • Revise the fourth sentence to state that those CMMs ‘‘as defined in Report MDC–02K1003’’ will be handled like a change to the AWL itself. • Delete the entire last sentence. We agree that clarification is necessary. Our intent is that any deviation from the CMMs as defined in Report MDC–02K1003 must be rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES Changes Made to This AD For standardization purposes, we have revised this AD in the following ways: • We have added a new paragraph (k) to this AD to specify that no alternative inspections, inspection intervals, or critical design configuration control limitations (CDCCLs) may be used unless they are part of a later approved revision of the Boeing Trijet Special Compliance Item Report, MDC– 02K1003, Revision C, dated July 24, 2007 (hereafter referred to as ‘‘Report MDC–02K1003’’), or unless they are approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC). Inclusion of this paragraph in the AD is intended to ensure that the AD-mandated airworthiness limitations changes are treated the same as the airworthiness limitations issued with the original type certificate. • We have simplified the language in Note 1 of this AD to clarify that an operator must request approval for an AMOC if the operator cannot accomplish the required inspections because an airplane has been previously modified, altered, or repaired in the areas addressed by the required inspections. Request To Revise Note 1 Boeing requests that we revise Note 1 of the NPRM to clarify that deviations from the AWLs specified in Report MDC–02K1003, should be approved as an AMOC according to paragraph (k) of the NPRM. Boeing states that Note 1 of the NPRM might be interpreted to mean that the AWLs specified in Report VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:13 Mar 18, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 approved by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO, or the governing regulatory authority, before those deviations can be used. However, we have not changed the AD as suggested by the commenter, since the ‘‘Changes to Component Maintenance Manuals (CMMs) Cited in Fuel Tank System AWLs’’ section of the NPRM is not retained in this final rule. Request To Refer to Additional Sources of Service Information FedEx states that, for certain CDCCLs, Appendix B of Report MDC–02K1003 does not refer to the applicable service information (e.g., airplane maintenance manual (AMM), standard wire practices manual, structural repair manual) for accomplishing the required maintenance action. FedEx also states that Boeing has determined where the CDCCLs should be added to the AMM and what verbiage should be used, and that this information has been published as a list on Boeing’s website. FedEx, therefore, requests that we revise paragraphs (g) and (h) of the proposed AD to refer to this list or other Boeing documents that clearly identify the manual changes corresponding to each CDCCL in Report MDC–02K1003. We disagree with revising this AD as requested by the commenter. For some CDCCLs, Boeing formatted Report MDC–02K1003 to provide specific information, where appropriate, concerning the limitations and necessary actions to maintain CDCCLs and ALIs. For other CDCCLs, Boeing has revised the applicable service information to ensure compatibility with those CDCCLs. This revised service information is readily available to affected operators; therefore, there is no need to be more specific for these particular CDCCLs. No change to this final rule is necessary. Conclusion We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed with the changes described previously. We also determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of the AD. Costs of Compliance There are about 300 airplanes of the affected design in the worldwide fleet. This AD affects about 180 airplanes of U.S. registry. The required actions take about 1 work hour per airplane, at an average labor rate of $80 per work hour. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the AD for U.S. operators is $14,400, or $80 per airplane. E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM 19MRR1 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 19, 2008 / Rules and Regulations Authority for This Rulemaking § 39.13 Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. I Regulatory Findings This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866, (2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of compliance in the AD Docket. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES I PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:13 Mar 18, 2008 Jkt 214001 [Amended] 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new AD: 2008–06–21 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39–15433. Docket No. FAA–2007–0201; Directorate Identifier 2007–NM–163–AD. Effective Date (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective April 23, 2008. Affected ADs (b) None. Applicability (c) This AD applies to all McDonnell Douglas Model DC–10–10 and DC–10–10F airplanes, Model DC–10–15 airplanes, Model DC–10–30 and DC–10–30F (KC–10A and KDC–10) airplanes, Model DC–10–40 and DC–10–40F airplanes, Model MD–10–10F and MD–10–30F airplanes, and Model MD– 11 and MD–11F airplanes, certificated in any category. Note 1: This AD requires revisions to certain operator maintenance documents to include new inspections. Compliance with these inspections is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in the areas addressed by these inspections, the operator may not be able to accomplish the inspections described in the revisions. In this situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with paragraph (l) of this AD. The request should include a description of changes to the required inspections that will ensure the continued operational safety of the airplane. Unsafe Condition (d) This AD results from a design review of the fuel tank systems. We are issuing this AD to prevent the potential for ignition sources inside fuel tanks caused by latent failures, alterations, repairs, or maintenance actions, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane. Compliance (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions have already been done. Service Information Reference (f) The term ‘‘Report MDC–02K1003’’ as used in this AD, means the Boeing Trijet Special Compliance Item Report, MDC– 02K1003, Revision C, dated July 24, 2007. Revise the FAA-Approved Maintenance Program (g) For Model DC–10–10 and DC–10–10F airplanes, Model DC–10–15 airplanes, Model DC–10–30 and DC–10–30F (KC–10A and KDC–10) airplanes, and Model DC–10–40 and DC–10–40F airplanes: Before December 16, 2008, revise the FAA-approved maintenance program to incorporate the PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 14675 information specified in Appendixes B, C, and D of Report MDC–02K1003. Accomplishing the revision in accordance with a later revision of Report MDC–02K1003 is an acceptable method of compliance if the revision is approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA. Revise the AWLs Section (h) For Model MD–10–10F and MD–10– 30F airplanes, and Model MD–11 and MD– 11F airplanes: Before December 16, 2008, revise the AWLs section of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness to incorporate the information specified in Appendixes B, C, and D of Report MDC–02K1003, except that the initial inspection required by paragraph (i) of this AD must be done at the applicable compliance time specified in that paragraph. Accomplishing the revision in accordance with a later revision of Report MDC–02K1003 is an acceptable method of compliance if the revision is approved by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO. Initial Inspection and Repair if Necessary (i) For Model MD–11 and MD–11F airplanes: Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD, do a detailed inspection of the metallic overbraiding and red-wrap tape installed on the tail tank fuel quantity indication system (FQIS) wiring to verify if the metallic overbraiding or redwrap tape is damaged or shows signs of deterioration, in accordance with ALI 20–2 of Appendix C of Report MDC–02K1003. If any discrepancy is found during the inspection, repair the discrepancy before further flight in accordance with ALI 20–2 of Appendix C of Report MDC–02K1003. Accomplishing the actions required by this paragraph in accordance with a later revision of Report MDC–02K1003 is an acceptable method of compliance if the revision is approved by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO. Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is: ‘‘An intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning and elaborate procedures may be required.’’ No Reporting Requirement (j) Although Report MDC–02K1003 specifies to submit certain information to the manufacturer, this AD does not require that action. No Alternative Inspections, Inspection Intervals, or Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCLs) (k) After accomplishing the applicable actions specified in paragraphs (g), (h), and (i) of this AD, no alternative inspections, inspection intervals, or CDCCLs may be used unless the inspections, intervals, or CDCCLs are part of a later revision of Report MDC– 02K1003 that is approved by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO; or unless the inspections, intervals, or CDCCLs are approved as an E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM 19MRR1 14676 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 19, 2008 / Rules and Regulations AMOC in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (l) of this AD. Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (l)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO. Material Incorporated by Reference (m) You must use Boeing Trijet Special Compliance Item Report, MDC–02K1003, Revision C, dated July 24, 2007, to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. This document has the following effective pages: Page No. Revision level shown on page Title Page, iii–iv, B24, B38 .............................................................................................................. ii, B2, B21, B26, B27, B34, B40, B41, C6, C7 ................................................................................ 1, B1, B3–B20, B22, B23, B25, B28–B33, B35–B37, B39, C1–C5, D1 ......................................... A1–A3 .............................................................................................................................................. C ................................ B ................................ A ................................ Original ...................... (This document does not include Page ii. The ‘‘Table of Contents’’ section of the document refers to Item 28–3 on Page B27; however, Item 28–3 is on Page B29 of the document. The revision dates are only specified in the ‘‘Index of Pages’’ section of the document.) (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of this service information under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and Service Management, Dept. C1–L5A (D800–0024). (3) You may review copies of the service information incorporated by reference at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to: https:// www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of _federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html. Number 2120–0725. The FAA request was approved by OMB without change and expires on March 31, 2011. This notice is to inform affected parties of the approval and to announce that the information collection requirements of SFAR No. 108 will become effective when the final rule becomes effective on April 7, 2008. Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 9, 2008. Stephen P. Boyd, Assistant Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E8–5145 Filed 3–18–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Parts 61, 91, and 135 [Docket No. FAA–2006–24981; Amendment Nos. 61–119, 91–301, and 135–114] rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES RIN 2120–AI82 Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 108—Mitsubishi MU–2B Series Airplane Special Training, Experience, and Operating Requirements; Notice of OMB Approval for Information Collection Federal Aviation Administration, DOT. AGENCY: VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:13 Mar 18, 2008 Jkt 214001 Final rule; notice of Office of Management and Budget approval for information collection. ACTION: SUMMARY: This notice announces the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) approval of the information collection requirement for Special Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) No. 108, which was published on February 6, 2008. DATES: The FAA received OMB approval for the information collection requirements in SFAR No. 108 on March 3, 2008. SFAR No. 108, which includes these information collection requirements, will become effective on April 7, 2008. The compliance date is February 6, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron Baker, General Aviation and Commercial Division, Commercial Operations Branch, AFS–800, Federal Aviation Administration, Room 835, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267–8212 ; facsimile (202) 267–5094. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 6, 2008, the FAA published the final rule, ‘‘Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 108—Mitsubishi MU–2B Series Airplane Special Training, Experience, and Operating Requirements’’ (73 FR 7034). The rule created new pilot training, experience, and operating requirements for persons operating the Mitsubishi MU–2B series airplane. The rule contained information collection requirements that had not yet been approved by the Office of Management and Budget at the time of publication. In the DATES section of the rule, the FAA noted that affected parties did not need to comply with the information collection requirements until OMB approved the FAA’s request to collect the information. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, OMB approved that request on March 3, 2008, and assigned the information collection OMB Control PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Date shown on page July 24, 2007. August 9, 2007. December 15, 2005. May 17, 2002. Authority for This Rulemaking The Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) authority to issue rules on aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the authority of the FAA to issue, rescind, and revise the rules. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, Part A, Air Commerce and Safety, Subpart III, Safety, section 44701, General Requirements. Under section 44701 the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations setting the minimum standards for practices, methods, and procedures necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it will set the minimum level of safety to operate the Mitsubishi MU–2B. Issued in Washington, DC, on March 13, 2008. Pamela Hamilton-Powell, Director, Office of Rulemaking. [FR Doc. E8–5470 Filed 3–18–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM 19MRR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 54 (Wednesday, March 19, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14673-14676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-5145]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2007-0201; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-163-AD;
Amendment 39-15433; AD 2008-06-21]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10-10 and
DC-10-10F Airplanes, Model DC-10-15 Airplanes, Model DC-10-30 and DC-
10-30F (KC-10A and KDC-10) Airplanes, Model DC-10-40 and DC-10-40F
Airplanes, Model MD-10-10F and MD-10-30F Airplanes, and Model MD-11 and
MD-11F Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
McDonnell Douglas airplane models identified above. This AD requires
revising the FAA-approved maintenance program, or the Airworthiness
Limitations (AWLs) section of the Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness, as applicable, to incorporate new AWLs for fuel tank
systems to satisfy Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88
requirements. For certain airplanes, this AD also requires the initial
accomplishment of a certain repetitive AWL inspection to phase in that
inspection, and repair if necessary. This AD results from a design
review of the fuel tank systems. We are issuing this AD to prevent the
potential for ignition sources inside fuel tanks caused by latent
failures, alterations, repairs, or maintenance actions, which, in
combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank
explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.

DATES: This AD is effective April 23, 2008.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of April 23,
2008.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood
Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and Service
Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024).

Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is the Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip C. Kush, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712-4137;
telephone (562) 627-5263; fax (562) 627-5210.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to
all McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10-10 and DC-10-10F airplanes, Model DC-
10-15 airplanes, Model DC-10-30 and DC-10-30F (KC-10A and KDC-10)

[[Page 14674]]

airplanes, Model DC-10-40 and DC-10-40F airplanes, Model MD-10-10F and
MD-10-30F airplanes, and Model MD-11 and MD-11F airplanes. That NPRM
was published in the Federal Register on November 19, 2007 (72 FR
64957). That NPRM proposed to require revising the FAA-approved
maintenance program, or the Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) section of
the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness, as applicable, to
incorporate new AWLs for fuel tank systems to satisfy Special Federal
Aviation Regulation No. 88 requirements. For certain airplanes, that
NPRM also proposed to require the initial accomplishment of a certain
repetitive AWL inspection to phase in that inspection, and repair if
necessary.

Comments

We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received from the two commenters.

Changes Made to This AD

For standardization purposes, we have revised this AD in the
following ways:
We have added a new paragraph (k) to this AD to specify
that no alternative inspections, inspection intervals, or critical
design configuration control limitations (CDCCLs) may be used unless
they are part of a later approved revision of the Boeing Trijet Special
Compliance Item Report, MDC-02K1003, Revision C, dated July 24, 2007
(hereafter referred to as ``Report MDC-02K1003''), or unless they are
approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC). Inclusion of
this paragraph in the AD is intended to ensure that the AD-mandated
airworthiness limitations changes are treated the same as the
airworthiness limitations issued with the original type certificate.
We have simplified the language in Note 1 of this AD to
clarify that an operator must request approval for an AMOC if the
operator cannot accomplish the required inspections because an airplane
has been previously modified, altered, or repaired in the areas
addressed by the required inspections.

Request To Revise Note 1

Boeing requests that we revise Note 1 of the NPRM to clarify that
deviations from the AWLs specified in Report MDC-02K1003, should be
approved as an AMOC according to paragraph (k) of the NPRM. Boeing
states that Note 1 of the NPRM might be interpreted to mean that the
AWLs specified in Report MDC-02K1003 must be revised to reflect
modifications, alterations, or repairs that are initiated by an
operator and outside of Boeing's design cognizance and responsibility.
Boeing requests that we revise Note 1 as follows:
Replace the words ``revision to'' with ``deviation from''
in the last sentence.
Delete the words ``(g), (h), or'' and ``as applicable''
from the last sentence.
As stated previously, we have simplified the language in Note 1 of
this AD for standardization with other similar ADs. The language the
commenter requests we change does not appear in the revised note;
therefore, no additional change to this AD is necessary in this regard.

Request To Clarify Approval of Component Maintenance Manual (CMM)
Changes

Boeing requests that we revise the heading and certain wording for
the ``Changes to Component Maintenance Manuals (CMMs) Cited in Fuel
Tank System AWLs'' section of the NPRM. Boeing believes that section
was intended to address situations where an operator chooses to deviate
from the procedures in the CMM referenced in Report MDC-02K1003. Boeing
states that its proposed changes are intended to clarify that only
deviations proposed by an operator require approval of the Manager, Los
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, FAA. Boeing further states that
wording in the NPRM could be interpreted to mean that approval of a CMM
in its entirety, including any future CMM revisions by Boeing, would
require direct approval of the Manager, Los Angeles, ACO, or governing
regulatory authority. Specifically, Boeing requests that we revise that
section as follows:
Revise the heading to ``Deviations from Component
Maintenance Manuals (CMMs) Cited in Fuel Tank System AWLs.''
Revise the third sentence to state that the Manager, Los
Angeles ACO, must approve ``any deviations from'' the CMMs ``as defined
in Report MDC-02K1003.''
Replace the words ``revision of'' with ``deviation from''
in the fourth sentence.
Revise the fourth sentence to state that those CMMs ``as
defined in Report MDC-02K1003'' will be handled like a change to the
AWL itself.
Delete the entire last sentence.
We agree that clarification is necessary. Our intent is that any
deviation from the CMMs as defined in Report MDC-02K1003 must be
approved by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO, or the governing regulatory
authority, before those deviations can be used. However, we have not
changed the AD as suggested by the commenter, since the ``Changes to
Component Maintenance Manuals (CMMs) Cited in Fuel Tank System AWLs''
section of the NPRM is not retained in this final rule.

Request To Refer to Additional Sources of Service Information

FedEx states that, for certain CDCCLs, Appendix B of Report MDC-
02K1003 does not refer to the applicable service information (e.g.,
airplane maintenance manual (AMM), standard wire practices manual,
structural repair manual) for accomplishing the required maintenance
action. FedEx also states that Boeing has determined where the CDCCLs
should be added to the AMM and what verbiage should be used, and that
this information has been published as a list on Boeing's website.
FedEx, therefore, requests that we revise paragraphs (g) and (h) of the
proposed AD to refer to this list or other Boeing documents that
clearly identify the manual changes corresponding to each CDCCL in
Report MDC-02K1003.
We disagree with revising this AD as requested by the commenter.
For some CDCCLs, Boeing formatted Report MDC-02K1003 to provide
specific information, where appropriate, concerning the limitations and
necessary actions to maintain CDCCLs and ALIs. For other CDCCLs, Boeing
has revised the applicable service information to ensure compatibility
with those CDCCLs. This revised service information is readily
available to affected operators; therefore, there is no need to be more
specific for these particular CDCCLs. No change to this final rule is
necessary.

Conclusion

We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD as proposed with the changes described previously. We also
determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden on
any operator or increase the scope of the AD.

Costs of Compliance

There are about 300 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. This AD affects about 180 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The required actions take about 1 work hour per airplane, at an average
labor rate of $80 per work hour. Based on these figures, the estimated
cost of the AD for U.S. operators is $14,400, or $80 per airplane.

[[Page 14675]]

Authority for This Rulemaking

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec. 39.13 [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2008-06-21 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-15433. Docket No. FAA-
2007-0201; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-163-AD.

Effective Date

(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective April 23,
2008.

Affected ADs

(b) None.

Applicability

(c) This AD applies to all McDonnell Douglas Model DC-10-10 and
DC-10-10F airplanes, Model DC-10-15 airplanes, Model DC-10-30 and
DC-10-30F (KC-10A and KDC-10) airplanes, Model DC-10-40 and DC-10-
40F airplanes, Model MD-10-10F and MD-10-30F airplanes, and Model
MD-11 and MD-11F airplanes, certificated in any category.

Note 1: This AD requires revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new inspections. Compliance with
these inspections is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes
that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in the
areas addressed by these inspections, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the inspections described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must
request approval for an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in
accordance with paragraph (l) of this AD. The request should include
a description of changes to the required inspections that will
ensure the continued operational safety of the airplane.

Unsafe Condition

(d) This AD results from a design review of the fuel tank
systems. We are issuing this AD to prevent the potential for
ignition sources inside fuel tanks caused by latent failures,
alterations, repairs, or maintenance actions, which, in combination
with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion
and consequent loss of the airplane.

Compliance

(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Service Information Reference

(f) The term ``Report MDC-02K1003'' as used in this AD, means
the Boeing Trijet Special Compliance Item Report, MDC-02K1003,
Revision C, dated July 24, 2007.

Revise the FAA-Approved Maintenance Program

(g) For Model DC-10-10 and DC-10-10F airplanes, Model DC-10-15
airplanes, Model DC-10-30 and DC-10-30F (KC-10A and KDC-10)
airplanes, and Model DC-10-40 and DC-10-40F airplanes: Before
December 16, 2008, revise the FAA-approved maintenance program to
incorporate the information specified in Appendixes B, C, and D of
Report MDC-02K1003. Accomplishing the revision in accordance with a
later revision of Report MDC-02K1003 is an acceptable method of
compliance if the revision is approved by the Manager, Los Angeles
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA.

Revise the AWLs Section

(h) For Model MD-10-10F and MD-10-30F airplanes, and Model MD-11
and MD-11F airplanes: Before December 16, 2008, revise the AWLs
section of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness to
incorporate the information specified in Appendixes B, C, and D of
Report MDC-02K1003, except that the initial inspection required by
paragraph (i) of this AD must be done at the applicable compliance
time specified in that paragraph. Accomplishing the revision in
accordance with a later revision of Report MDC-02K1003 is an
acceptable method of compliance if the revision is approved by the
Manager, Los Angeles ACO.

Initial Inspection and Repair if Necessary

(i) For Model MD-11 and MD-11F airplanes: Within 60 months after
the effective date of this AD, do a detailed inspection of the
metallic overbraiding and red-wrap tape installed on the tail tank
fuel quantity indication system (FQIS) wiring to verify if the
metallic overbraiding or red-wrap tape is damaged or shows signs of
deterioration, in accordance with ALI 20-2 of Appendix C of Report
MDC-02K1003. If any discrepancy is found during the inspection,
repair the discrepancy before further flight in accordance with ALI
20-2 of Appendix C of Report MDC-02K1003. Accomplishing the actions
required by this paragraph in accordance with a later revision of
Report MDC-02K1003 is an acceptable method of compliance if the
revision is approved by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO.

Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is:
``An intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or
assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available
lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as
mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning
and elaborate procedures may be required.''

No Reporting Requirement

(j) Although Report MDC-02K1003 specifies to submit certain
information to the manufacturer, this AD does not require that
action.

No Alternative Inspections, Inspection Intervals, or Critical Design
Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCLs)

(k) After accomplishing the applicable actions specified in
paragraphs (g), (h), and (i) of this AD, no alternative inspections,
inspection intervals, or CDCCLs may be used unless the inspections,
intervals, or CDCCLs are part of a later revision of Report MDC-
02K1003 that is approved by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO; or unless
the inspections, intervals, or CDCCLs are approved as an

[[Page 14676]]

AMOC in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (l) of
this AD.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

(l)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance with the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.

Material Incorporated by Reference

(m) You must use Boeing Trijet Special Compliance Item Report,
MDC-02K1003, Revision C, dated July 24, 2007, to do the actions
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. This
document has the following effective pages:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page No. Revision level shown on page Date shown on page
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title Page, iii-iv, B24, B38.......... C.................................. July 24, 2007.
ii, B2, B21, B26, B27, B34, B40, B41, B.................................. August 9, 2007.
C6, C7.
1, B1, B3-B20, B22, B23, B25, B28-B33, A.................................. December 15, 2005.
B35-B37, B39, C1-C5, D1.
A1-A3................................. Original........................... May 17, 2002.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(This document does not include Page ii. The ``Table of Contents''
section of the document refers to Item 28-3 on Page B27; however,
Item 28-3 is on Page B29 of the document. The revision dates are
only specified in the ``Index of Pages'' section of the document.)
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood
Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and Service
Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024).
(3) You may review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or
go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 9, 2008.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Assistant Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8-5145 Filed 3-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.