Census Block Group Program for the 2010 Decennial Census-Final Criteria, 13829-13836 [E8-5075]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 51 / Friday, March 14, 2008 / Notices
Deletion
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
I certify that the following action will not
have a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The major factors
considered for this certification were:
1. If approved, the action should not result
in additional reporting, recordkeeping or
other compliance requirements for small
entities.
2. If approved, the action may result in
authorizing small entities to furnish the
service to the Government.
3. There are no known regulatory
alternatives which would accomplish the
objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O’Day Act (41
U.S.C. 46–48c) in connection with the service
proposed for deletion from the Procurement
List.
Comments on this certification are invited.
Commenters should identify the statement(s)
underlying the certification on which they
are providing additional information.
which would be likely to significantly
frustrate implementation of a proposed
agency action. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(9)(B))
In addition, part of the discussion will
relate solely to the internal personnel
and organizational issues of the BBG or
the International Broadcasting Bureau.
(5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(2) and (6)).
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Persons interested in obtaining more
information should contact Timi
Nickerson Kenealy at (202) 203–4545.
Dated: March 11, 2008.
Timi Nickerson Kenealy,
Acting Legal Counsel.
[FR Doc. 08–1031 Filed 3–11–08; 4:36 pm]
BILLING CODE 8610–01–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
End of Certification
The following service is proposed for
deletion from the Procurement List:
Bureau of the Census
Services
Service Type/Location: Janitorial/Custodial,
U.S. Federal Building, Courthouse and
Post Office, 301 West Main Street,
Benton, IL.
NPA: Franklin-Williamson Human Services,
Inc., West Frankfort, IL,
Contracting Activity: General Services
Administration,
Census Block Group Program for the
2010 Decennial Census—Final Criteria
[Docket Number 070126022–8027–02]
Kimberly M. Zeich,
Director, Program Operations.
[FR Doc. E8–5155 Filed 3–13–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353–01–P
BROADCASTING BOARD OF
GOVERNORS
Sunshine Act Meeting; (Canceled)
Wednesday, March 12,
2008 3 p.m.–3:45 p.m.
PLACE: Cohen Building, Room 3321,
330 Independence Ave., SW.,
Washington, DC 20237.
CLOSED MEETING: The members of the
Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG)
will meet in closed session to review
and discuss a number of issues relating
to U.S. Government-funded nonmilitary international broadcasting.
They will address internal procedural,
budgetary, and personnel issues, as well
as sensitive foreign policy issues
relating to potential options in the U.S.
international broadcasting field. This
meeting is closed because if open it
likely would either disclose matters that
would be properly classified to be kept
secret in the interest of foreign policy
under the appropriate executive order (5
U.S.C. 552b.(c)(1)) or would disclose
information the premature disclosure of
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
DATE AND TIME:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:17 Mar 13, 2008
Jkt 214001
Bureau of the Census,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of final criteria and
program implementation.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Block groups are statistical
geographic divisions of a census tract,
defined for the tabulation and
presentation of decennial census data.
Block groups also will be used to
tabulate and present period estimates
from the American Community Survey
(ACS) 1 after 2010. Block groups provide
the geographic framework within which
the Bureau of the Census (Census
Bureau) defines census blocks. Each
block group comprises a reasonably
compact and contiguous cluster of
census blocks; up to nine block groups
can be contained within a single census
tract.
This Notice announces the Census
Bureau’s final criteria for the Census
Block Group Program for the 2010
Decennial Census. In addition, this
Notice contains a summary of comments
received to proposed criteria published
in the April 6, 2007 Federal Register (72
FR 17337), as well as the Census
Bureau’s response to these comments. In
response to comments received, the
Census Bureau has modified its
proposed criteria for the Census Block
Group Program for the 2010 Decennial
Census. Most provisions of the block
1 The ACS is conducted in the United States and
in Puerto Rico. In Puerto Rico, the survey is called
the Puerto Rico Community Survey. For ease of
discussion, throughout this document the term ACS
is used to represent both the survey that is
conducted in the United States and in Puerto Rico.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13829
group criteria for the 2010 Census
remain unchanged from those used in
conjunction with the 2000 Decennial
Census, except as follows. First, the
same population and housing unit
thresholds, a minimum of 600 people or
240 housing units and a maximum of
3,000 people or 1,200 housing units,
will apply to all types of populated
block groups, including block groups
delineated within American Indian
reservations and off-reservation trust
lands, the Island Areas, and
encompassing group quarters, military
installations, and institutions. Second,
housing unit counts may be used
instead of population counts in the
delineation of block groups. Third, the
delineation of special land use tracts
will be permitted, and encouraged, for
areas with special land uses (e.g.,
airports, military reservations, public
forests, public parks, and special places/
group quarters) with an official name.
Finally, a geographic framework of
tribal block groups, separate from the
standard block groups defined within
counties, will be defined within
federally recognized American Indian
reservations and/or off-reservation trust
lands, subject to other population,
housing, and boundary criteria
contained in this document.
Upon publication of the final criteria
contained in this Notice, the Census
Bureau will offer governments,
organizations, and interested data users
an opportunity to review and, if
necessary, suggest updates to the
boundaries and attributes of the block
groups in their geographic area under
the Participant Statistical Areas Program
(PSAP). In addition to block groups, the
PSAP also encompasses the review and
update of census tracts, census
designated places, and census county
divisions (in selected states).
DATES: This notice’s final criteria will be
effective on March 14, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Geographic Standards and Criteria
Branch, Geography Division, U.S.
Census Bureau, via e-mail at
geo.psap.list@census.gov or telephone at
(301) 763–3056.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. History of Block Groups
The Census Bureau first delineated
block groups as statistical geographic
divisions of census tracts for the 1970
Census, comprising contiguous
combinations of census blocks for data
presentation purposes. At that time,
census block groups only existed in
urbanized areas in which census blocks
were defined. Block groups were
defined without regard to political and
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
13830
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 51 / Friday, March 14, 2008 / Notices
administrative boundaries, with an
average population of 1,000, and to be
approximately equal in area.
As use of census block, block group,
and census tract data increased among
data users, the Census Bureau expanded
these programs to cover additional
geographic areas while redefining the
population threshold criteria to more
adequately suit data users’ needs. The
1990 Census was the first in which
census blocks and block groups were
defined throughout the entirety of the
United States, Puerto Rico, and the
Island Areas. For Census 2000, as with
census tracts, the Census Bureau
increased the number of geographic
areas whose boundaries could be used
as block group boundaries, and allowed
tribal governments of federally
recognized American Indian tribes with
a reservation and/or off-reservation trust
lands to delineate block groups without
regard to state and/or county
boundaries, provided the tribe had a
1990 Census population of at least
1,000.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
II. Summary of Comments Received in
Response to Proposed Criteria for the
Census Block Group Program for the
2010 Census
The April 6, 2007, Federal Register
(72 FR 17337) requested comment on
the proposed criteria for delineating
block groups for the 2010 Decennial
Census which contained the following
changes to the criteria used in the 2000
Decennial Census: (1) Increasing the
minimum population and housing unit
thresholds for block groups from 600 to
1,200 persons; (2) using housing unit
counts (as an alternative to population
counts) in the delineation review and
update of block groups; (3) applying the
same population and housing unit
thresholds to all types of populated
block groups in the United States,2
including block groups delineated on
American Indian reservations and/or
off-reservation trust lands,3 the Island
Areas,4 and encompassing group
2 For Census Bureau purposes, the United States
includes the fifty states and the District of
Columbia.
3 The proposed criteria for the tribal statistical
areas program will be outlined in a separate Federal
Register notice. In the tribal statistical areas
program, federally recognized American Indian
tribes that have a reservation and/or off-reservation
trust land may delineate census designated places
and, if these areas have a population of 1,200 or
greater, may delineate tribal tracts and tribal block
groups for their reservation and off-reservation trust
land.
4 For Census Bureau purposes, the Island Areas
includes American Samoa, the Commonwealth of
the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, the U.S.
Virgin Islands, and the U.S. Minor Outlying Islands.
The U.S. Minor Outlying Islands is an aggregation
of nine U.S. territories: Baker Island, Howland
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:17 Mar 13, 2008
Jkt 214001
quarters, military installations, and
institutions; (4) allowing the delineation
of block groups for large water bodies
with areas of approximately 100 square
miles or more, and special land uses
(e.g., large airports or public parks) with
an official name; and (5) allowing for
geographic frameworks of tribal block
groups (separate from the standard
block groups defined within counties
and standard census tracts) to be
defined within federally recognized
American Indian reservations and/or
off-reservation trust lands.
The Census Bureau received letters
(each containing comments on several
issues) from 33 organizations and
individuals on the proposed minimum
population and housing unit thresholds
in the review and update of block
groups, the proposed use of housing
unit counts in the review and update of
block groups, and the permitted
delineation of census tracts for large
water bodies and special land use tracts
for which a single coextensive block
group would be delineated. Comments
received are summarized below, as well
as the Census Bureau’s response to these
comments.
1. Minimum population and housing
unit count thresholds in the review and
update of block groups.
The Census Bureau received 32
comments opposed to increasing the
minimum population threshold for
block groups from 600 to 1,200. Only
one commenter favored the proposed
increase citing the need to maintain
statistical reliability. Nearly all
commenters expressed strong concern
about the resulting loss of geographic
detail and the detrimental impact on
demographic analysis for small
geographic areas should the minimum
population be increased to 1,200.
Commenters opposed to an increased
minimum threshold included
metropolitan planning organizations,
councils of governments, local
governmental agencies, private sector
data users, a state redistricting liaison,
and members of the Census Advisory
Committee Professional Associations.
Additional research by the Census
Bureau indicated that coefficients of
variation for selected demographic
characteristics did not improve
substantially for block groups of 1,200
people compared to block groups of 600
people. Given the comments opposed to
the proposed increased threshold, and
taking into consideration the loss of
geographic detail without substantive
improvement to data quality and
Island, Jarvis Island, Johnston Atoll, Kingman Reef,
Midway Islands, Navassa Island, Palmyra Atoll, and
Wake Island.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
reliability, the Census Bureau will not
change the minimum population
threshold for block groups. The
minimum block group threshold will
remain at 600 people (240 housing
units) for the 2010 Census. Participants
reviewing and delineating block groups
for the 2010 Census and data users
utilizing the sample-based data for block
groups must be aware of the sample data
reliability issues for geographies with
low populations and the appropriate
uses for sample data for low population
geographies. The Census Bureau will
provide additional information about
sample data reliability and appropriate
uses of sample data for geographic areas
with low populations in the PSAP
guidelines.
2. Using housing unit counts in the
review and update of block groups.
The Census Bureau received five
comments in response to the proposed
use of housing unit counts in the review
and update of block groups as an
alternative to population counts where
appropriate. Four commenters
supported the concept. Another
supported the proposal, but requested
more guidance on when housing units,
instead of population, should be used to
define block groups. Given the support
of using housing unit counts in the
review and update for census tracts, the
Census Bureau will retain the concept
in the final criteria for the 2010 Census.
Guidance as to when housing unit
counts should be used in place of
population counts in the review and
update of census tracts will be
discussed in this notice, and further
detailed in the PSAP guidelines.
3. Permitting the delineation of
census tracts, with coextensive block
groups, for large water bodies and
special land uses.
The Census Bureau received five
comments in response to the proposed
special land use tract and block group
proposal. Four commenters representing
various levels of local government, as
well as nongovernmental organizations
supported the concept. One commenter
suggested that more discussion on the
concept is needed to make an informed
decision. Given the support of the
special land use tract and coextensive
block group designation, the Census
Bureau will retain the concept in the
final criteria for the 2010 Census.
The Census Bureau received three
comments in response to the proposed
large water body tract and block group
proposal. Two commenters supported
the concept. One commenter opposed
the concept, citing increased confusion
and disorientation for data users with
respect to what is commonly depicted
on non-census maps. Based on this
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 51 / Friday, March 14, 2008 / Notices
comment and after additional internal
review, the Census Bureau has
determined not to retain the large water
block group concept in the final criteria
for the 2010 Census.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Changes to the Proposed Criteria as a
Result of Public Comments
Changes made to the final criteria
(from the proposed criteria) in ‘‘Section
III, General Principles and Criteria for
Block Groups for the 2010 Census’’ are
as follows:
1. Section A, ‘‘General Principles,’’
subsection 3: renumbered in this notice
as subsection 2. We moved this section
to emphasize that block groups form the
geographic framework within which the
Census Bureau defines census blocks.
2. Section A, ‘‘General Principles,’’
subsection 2: renumbered in this notice
as subsection 3. The first sentence in
this subsection has been reworded to
provide greater specificity and clarity.
We added the third sentence pertaining
to the Census Bureau’s disclosure rules;
this sentence had appeared in Section
B.1 of the previous notice. In the fourth
sentence, we replaced ‘‘local
governments and planners’’ with ‘‘PSAP
participants’’ because not all
participants in the 2010 PSAP will be
representatives of local governments or
will be professional planners. We also
added sentences that clarify the
minimum population and housing unit
thresholds, noting that any block group
with a population or housing unit count
less than the minimum threshold
should be updated, and clarifying that
the Census Bureau will use Census 2000
population and housing unit counts to
assess whether each block group
submitted meets the minimum
threshold criterion.
3. Section A, ‘‘General Principles:’’
added subsection 4, which notes that
housing unit counts may be used in the
review and updating of block groups,
particularly with regard to communities
that may not have sufficient residential
population present on the date of the
decennial census, but will have larger
populations at other times of the year
and for which estimates may be
reflected in the ACS.
4. Section A, ‘‘General Principles,’’
subsection 4: renumbered in this notice
as section 5. This subsection was moved
because the new subsection 4 (see
above) is closely related to issues
discussed in subsection 3. We removed
the reference to water body block groups
since this proposed criterion has not
been adopted in the final criteria.
5. Section B, ‘‘Changes to the Block
Group Criteria for the 2010 Census:’’
this section was omitted from this
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:17 Mar 13, 2008
Jkt 214001
notice as all changes are addressed in
the final criteria.
6. Section C, ‘‘Block Group Criteria for
the 2010 Census,’’ subsection 1:
Renumbered in this notice as subsection
3. We revised the order of the first few
criteria for clarity. Section C in the April
6, 2007 Federal Register (72 FR 17337)
is now Section B in this Notice.
7. Section C, ‘‘Block Group Criteria for
the 2010 Census,’’ subsection 2:
Renumbered in this notice as subsection
1, for clarity. We also changed the
population threshold referenced in the
subsection from 1,200 to 600, to reflect
the decision to retain the latter as the
minimum population threshold for a
block group.
8. Section C, ‘‘Block Group Criteria for
the 2010 Census,’’ subsection 3:
Renumbered in this notice as subsection
2, reflecting the decision to revise the
order of the first few criteria listed.
Removed the last sentence relating to
water body block groups since this
proposed criterion has not been adopted
in the final criteria.
9. Section C, ‘‘Block Group Criteria for
the 2010 Census,’’ subsection 4: The
second sentence was moved to the third
sentence in this notice and the word
‘‘permits’’ was changed to ‘‘requires’’ to
clarify that state and county boundaries
must form block group boundaries.
10. Section C, ‘‘Block Group Criteria
for the 2010 Census,’’ subsection 5:
Added the word ‘‘measurement’’ after
‘‘area’’ in both the text and the tables in
this subsection. In addition, in
subsection 5.c, all text relating to water
body block groups was removed since
this proposed criterion has not been
adopted in the final criteria.
11. Section D, ‘‘Tribal Block Groups:’’
We revised wording throughout the
section to provide greater clarity.
Discussion of tribal block groups is
contained in Section C of this Notice.
III. General Principles and Criteria for
Block Groups for the 2010 Census
A. General Principles
1. Block groups are statistical
geographic divisions of a census tract,
defined by the Census Bureau in
cooperation with local officials and
organizations, for the tabulation and
dissemination of decennial census data,
as well as period estimates of
demographic and housing
characteristics from the ACS.
2. Block groups form the geographic
framework within which the Census
Bureau defines census blocks for use in
tabulating and presenting decennial
census data. Census blocks are
numbered within block groups.
3. The sample size for the ACS is
smaller than the sample from the
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13831
decennial census long form of previous
censuses. As a general rule, estimates
from programs providing sample data,
including the ACS, for geographic areas
with smaller populations will be subject
to higher variances than comparable
estimates for areas with larger
populations (i.e., the sample data for
smaller population geographies will
likely be less reliable than the sample
data for geographies with larger
population). In addition, the Census
Bureau’s disclosure rules may have the
effect of restricting the availability and
amount of sample data published for
geographic areas with small
populations. Aiming to create block
groups that fall between the minimum
and maximum thresholds will improve
the reliability and availability of data,
and PSAP participants should consider
these factors when defining their block
groups.
Therefore, each block group must
encompass at least 600 people or at least
240 housing units unless it is
coextensive with a flagged special land
use tract, or is coextensive with a
county with fewer than 600 people. Any
block group with a population or
housing unit count less than the
minimum threshold should be updated
to meet or exceed the minimum
threshold. The Census Bureau will use
Census 2000 population and housing
unit counts, with allowance made for
growth since 2000, to assess whether
each submitted block group meets this
criterion. Program participants may
submit local estimates as a surrogate for
the Census 2000 population and
housing unit counts for a block group.
4. With the advent of the ACS and the
‘‘continuous measurement’’ of
characteristics of the population and
housing based on a five-year average,
there are some new issues to consider in
the block group criteria. To
accommodate this change, either
population or housing units may be
used in the review of block groups. The
use of housing unit counts
accommodates seasonal communities in
which residents often are not present on
the date of the decennial census, but
will be present at other times of the year
and for which estimates may be
reflected in the ACS. The ACS is
designed to produce local area data as
of a 12-month period estimate (or an
average); whereas, in the past local area
data were only represented as of the
April 1 census day.
5. The Census Bureau recognizes that
there are geographic areas that are not
characterized by a residential
population, and which local
participants may wish to separate from
populated block groups for analytical or
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
13832
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 51 / Friday, March 14, 2008 / Notices
cartographic purposes or both. Such
areas may be designated as special land
use block groups to distinguish them
from populated block groups. Special
land use block groups must be
designated as a specific type of land use
(e.g., state park, municipal park) and
have an official name, generally have
little or no residential population or
housing units, and must not create a
noncontiguous block group. If located in
a densely populated urban area, a
special land use block group must have
an area measurement of approximately
one square mile or more. If delineated
completely outside an urban area, a
special land use block group must have
an area of approximately 10 square
miles or more. The Census Bureau
recognizes that some special land use
areas not intended for residential
population, such as parks, may contain
some population, such as caretakers or
the homeless. Our intent is to allow for
the delineation of parks and other
special land use areas as separate block
groups and therefore will accept such
areas as block groups even if some
residential population is present.
B. Block Group Criteria for the 2010
Census
The criteria herein apply to the
United States, including federally
recognized American Indian
reservations and off-reservation trust
lands, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas.
The Census Bureau may modify and, if
necessary, reject any proposals for block
groups that do not meet these final
criteria. In addition, the Census Bureau
reserves the right to modify the
boundaries and attributes of block
groups as needed to meet the published
criteria and/or maintain geographic
relationships before the final tabulation
geography is set for the 2010 Census.
The Census Bureau sets forth the
following criteria for use in delineating
2010 census block groups:
1. Block groups must not cross census
tract boundaries.
This criterion takes precedence over
all other criteria or requirements. By
definition, because census tracts cannot
cross county and state boundaries,
neither can block groups. It is only
permissible to define a block group with
fewer than 600 people in a county that
has a population less than 600, or as
coextensive with a special land use
tract.
2. Block groups must cover the entire
land and water area of each census tract.
Because census tracts must cover the
entire area of a county, by definition,
block groups also must cover the entire
area of each county.
3. A block group must comprise a
reasonable compact, contiguous land
area.
Noncontiguous boundaries are
permitted only where a contiguous area
or inaccessible area would not meet
population or housing unit count
requirements for a separate block group,
in which case the noncontiguous or
inaccessible area must be combined
within an adjacent or proximate block
group. For example, an island that does
not meet the minimum population
threshold for recognition as a separate
block group should be combined with
other proximate land to form a single
block group. Each case will be reviewed
and accepted at the Census Bureau’s
discretion.
4. Block group boundaries should
follow visible and identifiable features.
To make the location of block group
boundaries less ambiguous, wherever
possible, block group boundaries should
follow visible and identifiable features.
The use of visible features makes it
easier to locate and identify block group
boundaries over time as the locations of
many visible features in the landscape
tend to change infrequently. The Census
Bureau also requires the use of state and
county boundaries in all states, and
permits the use of incorporated place
and minor civil division boundaries in
states where those boundaries tend to
remain unchanged over time (see
Table 1).
The following features are preferred
as block group boundaries for the 2010
Census:
a. State, county, and census tract
boundaries must always be block group
boundaries. This criterion takes
precedence over all other boundary
criteria or requirements.
b. American Indian reservation and
off-reservation trust land boundaries.
c. Visible, perennial natural and
cultural features, such as roads,
shorelines, rivers, perennial streams and
canals, railroad tracks, or above-ground
high-tension power lines.
d. Boundaries of legal and
administrative entities in selected states.
Table 1 identifies by state which
minor civil division (MCD) and
incorporated place boundaries may be
used as block group boundaries.
TABLE 1.—ACCEPTABLE MCD AND INCORPORATED PLACE BOUNDARIES
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Boundaries
All MCD
boundaries
Boundaries of
MCDs not coincident with
the boundaries
of incorporated
places that
themselves
are MCDs
Alabama ...........................................................................................................
Alaska ..............................................................................................................
Arizona .............................................................................................................
Arkansas ..........................................................................................................
California ..........................................................................................................
Colorado ..........................................................................................................
Connecticut ......................................................................................................
Delaware ..........................................................................................................
Florida ..............................................................................................................
Georgia ............................................................................................................
Hawaii ..............................................................................................................
Idaho ................................................................................................................
Illinois ...............................................................................................................
Indiana .............................................................................................................
Iowa .................................................................................................................
Kansas .............................................................................................................
Kentucky ..........................................................................................................
Louisiana ..........................................................................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
X
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
X
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
Xa
........................
X
X
........................
........................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:17 Mar 13, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
All incorporated place
boundaries
Only conjoint
incorporated
place boundaries
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
X
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
X
X
X
X
X
X
........................
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
14MRN1
13833
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 51 / Friday, March 14, 2008 / Notices
TABLE 1.—ACCEPTABLE MCD AND INCORPORATED PLACE BOUNDARIES—Continued
Boundaries
All MCD
boundaries
Boundaries of
MCDs not coincident with
the boundaries
of incorporated
places that
themselves
are MCDs
Maine ...............................................................................................................
Maryland ..........................................................................................................
Massachusetts .................................................................................................
Michigan ...........................................................................................................
Minnesota ........................................................................................................
Mississippi ........................................................................................................
Missouri ............................................................................................................
Montana ...........................................................................................................
Nebraska ..........................................................................................................
Nevada .............................................................................................................
New Hampshire ...............................................................................................
New Jersey ......................................................................................................
New Mexico .....................................................................................................
New York .........................................................................................................
North Carolina ..................................................................................................
North Dakota ....................................................................................................
Ohio .................................................................................................................
Oklahoma .........................................................................................................
Oregon .............................................................................................................
Pennsylvania ....................................................................................................
Rhode Island ....................................................................................................
South Carolina .................................................................................................
South Dakota ...................................................................................................
Tennessee .......................................................................................................
Texas ...............................................................................................................
Utah .................................................................................................................
Vermont ...........................................................................................................
Virginia .............................................................................................................
Washington ......................................................................................................
West Virginia ....................................................................................................
Wisconsin .........................................................................................................
Wyoming ..........................................................................................................
X
........................
X
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
X
X
........................
X
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
X
X
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
X
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
X
X
........................
Xb
........................
Xa
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
X
X
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
X
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
X
........................
a Townships
All incorporated place
boundaries
Only conjoint
incorporated
place boundaries
X
........................
X
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
X
X
........................
X
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
X
X
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
X
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
X
........................
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
........................
........................
X
........................
X
X
X
X
X
........................
........................
X
X
X
X
X
........................
X
X
X
X
X
only.
townships only.
b Governmental
e. Additionally, the following legally
defined, administrative boundaries are
permitted as block group boundaries:
i. Barrio, barrio-pueblo, and subbarrio
boundaries in Puerto Rico;
ii. Census subdistrict boundaries in
the U.S. Virgin Islands;
iii. County and island boundaries
(both MCD equivalents) in American
Samoa;
iv. Election district boundaries in
Guam;
v. Municipal district boundaries in
the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands; and
vi. Alaska Native regional corporation
boundaries in Alaska, at the discretion
of the Census Bureau, insofar as such
boundaries are unambiguous for
allocating living quarters as part of 2010
Census activities.
f. When acceptable visible and
governmental boundary features are not
available for use as block group
boundaries, the Census Bureau may, at
its discretion, approve other
nonstandard visible features, such as
ridge lines, above-ground pipelines,
intermittent streams, or fence lines. The
Census Bureau may also accept, on a
case-by-case basis, the boundaries of
selected nonstandard and potentially
nonvisible features, such as the
boundaries of military installations,
National Parks, National Monuments,
National Forests, other types of parks or
forests, airports, marine ports,
cemeteries, golf courses, penitentiaries/
prisons, glaciers, or the straight-line
extensions of visible features and other
lines-of-sight.
5. Population, Housing Unit, and Area
Measurement Thresholds
The following are the population,
housing unit, and area measurement
threshold criteria for block groups (as
summarized in Table 2).
TABLE 2.—BLOCK GROUP THRESHOLDS
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Block group type
Threshold type
Minimum
Standard & tribal block groups .......................................
Population threshold .......................................................
Housing Unit threshold ...................................................
Area measurement threshold within an urban area
(square miles).
600 ..............
240 ..............
1.0 ...............
Special land use block groups ........................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:17 Mar 13, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
Maximum
3,000.
1,200.
none.
13834
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 51 / Friday, March 14, 2008 / Notices
TABLE 2.—BLOCK GROUP THRESHOLDS—Continued
Block group type
Threshold type
Area measurement threshold outside an urban area
(square miles).
Population thresholds .....................................................
The same population and housing
unit thresholds apply to all types of
populated block groups, including block
groups delineated within American
Indian reservations and off-reservation
trust lands, the Island Areas, and
encompassing group quarters, military
installations, and institutions. This
should improve the availability and
reliability of data for block groups that
had a lower threshold for the 2000
Decennial Census, and will create a
single national standard.
a. Census 2000 population counts
should be used in census block group
review in most cases. Housing unit
counts should be used for block groups
in seasonal communities that have no or
low population on census day (April 1).
Locally produced population and
housing unit estimates can be used
when reviewing and updating block
groups, especially in areas that have
experienced considerable growth since
Census 2000.
b. The housing unit thresholds are
based on a national average of 2.5
people per household. The Census
Bureau recognizes that there are
Minimum
10 ................
regional variations to this average, and
will take this into consideration when
reviewing all census block group
proposals.
c. For the 2010 Census, the Census
Bureau will allow the delineation of
special land use census tracts, and
special land use block groups will be
created coextensive with these special
land use tracts. A special land use tract,
and hence a special land use block
group, must be designated as a specific
land use type (e.g., state park), must
have an official name (e.g., Jay Cooke
State Park), have little or no residential
population or meet population or
housing unit thresholds, and must not
create a noncontiguous tract/block
group. In some instances, multiple areas
can be combined to form a single special
land use tract/block group if the land
management characteristics are similar,
such as a special land use tract/block
group comprising adjacent federal and
state parks. If the special land use tract/
block group is delineated in a densely
populated, urban area, the tract/block
group must have an area of
Maximum
none.
(1) Little or none, or within
standard
block
group
thresholds.
approximately one square mile or more.
If the special land use tract/block group
is delineated completely outside an
urban area, the tract/block group must
have an area of approximately 10 square
miles or more.
6. Identification of Block Groups
a. A block group encompasses a
cluster of census blocks. Each standard
block group is identified using a singledigit number that will correspond to the
first digit in the number of each block
encompassed by the block group. For
example, block group 3 includes all
census blocks numbered in the 3000
range within a single census tract.
b. The range of acceptable standard
block group numbers is 1 through 9.
Block group numbers must always be
unique within a census tract.
7. Block Group Types
Table 3 below contains a summary of
the types of block groups (with their
respective population, housing unit and
area measurement thresholds) that will
be used for the 2010 Census.
TABLE 3.—SUMMARY OF BLOCK GROUP TYPES
How distinct from standard block groups
Standard & tribal
block groups.
Special land use
block groups.
Population thresholds
Housing unit
thresholds
Tribal block groups are conceptually similar and equivalent to census block groups defined within the standard
State-county-tract-block group geographic hierarchy
used for tabulating and publishing statistical data.
A block group coextensive with a special land use tract,
encompassing a large airport, public park, or public forest with little or no population or housing units. In a
densely populated, urban area, a special land use
block group must be approximately 1.0 square mile in
area or greater. If delineated completely outside an
urban area, a special land use block group must have
an area of 10 square miles or greater.
Minimum: 600;
Maximum: 3,000.
Minimum: 240;
Maximum: 1,200.
none.
Little or none, or
within the standard block group
thresholds.
Little or none, or
within the standard block group
thresholds.
1.0 square mile
within an urban
area/10 square
miles outside an
urban area.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
C. Tribal Block Groups
Tribal block groups are statistical
geographic entities defined by the
Census Bureau in cooperation with
tribal officials to provide meaningful,
relevant, and reliable data for small
geographic areas within the boundaries
of federally recognized American Indian
reservations and/or off-reservation trust
lands. As such, they recognize the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:17 Mar 13, 2008
Jkt 214001
unique statistical data needs of federally
recognized American Indian tribes. The
delineation of tribal block groups allows
for an unambiguous presentation of
statistical data specific to a federally
recognized reservation and/or offreservation trust land without the
imposition of state or county
boundaries, which might artificially
separate American Indian populations
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Area measurement
thresholds
located within a single reservation and/
or off-reservation trust land. To this end,
the American Indian tribal participant 5
5 For federally recognized American Indian tribes
with reservations and/or off-reservation trust lands
that have more than 1,200 residents, the Census
Bureau will offer the tribal government the
opportunity to delineate tribal block groups and
other tribal statistical geography on their
reservation and/or off-reservation trust land. For
federally recognized tribes with an American Indian
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 51 / Friday, March 14, 2008 / Notices
may define tribal block groups that cross
county or state boundaries, or both.
Tribal block groups must be delineated
to meet all other census block group
criteria, and must be identified uniquely
so as to clearly distinguish them from
county-based block groups. The Census
Bureau will address the type of
identifiers required for tribal block
groups in more detail in a separate
Federal Register notice pertaining to
American Indian statistical areas. Tribal
block group boundaries will be held as
census block boundaries. Census blocks,
however, will be numbered uniquely
within county-based block groups, and
thus there will not be a direct
relationship between a tribal block
group identifier and census block
numbers. Tribal block groups are
conceptually similar and equivalent to
census block groups defined within the
standard state-county-tract-block group
geographic hierarchy used for tabulating
and publishing statistical data.
In order to provide meaningful
statistical geographic areas within the
reservation and/or off-reservation trust
land, as well as make meaningful and
reliable data available for these areas
and their populations, for the 2010
Census, tribal block group geography
will be maintained separately from
standard county-based block groups,
and will be defined through a separate
program designed specifically for tribal
statistical geography. This differs from
the procedure for Census 2000 in which
tribal block groups were defined for
federally recognized American Indian
reservations and/or off-reservation trust
lands, and standard block groups were
identified by superimposing county and
state boundaries onto the Census 2000
tribal block groups.
For Census 2000 products in which
data were presented by state and
county, the standard state-county-tractblock group hierarchy was maintained,
even for territory contained within an
American Indian reservation and/or offreservation trust land. In such instances,
the state/county portions of tribal block
groups were identified as individual
block groups, and these standard block
groups may not have met the minimum
population or housing unit thresholds,
potentially limiting sample data
reliability or availability for both the
tribal block group and the derived
standard block groups. The change for
the 2010 Census, creating standard
block groups nationwide and
maintaining tribal block groups as a
reservation and/or off-reservation trust land that
have fewer than 1,200 residents, the Census Bureau
will define one tribal tract and one tribal block
group coextensive with the American Indian
reservation and/or off-reservation trust land.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:17 Mar 13, 2008
Jkt 214001
completely separate set of geography
from standard block groups in both
geographic and data presentation
purposes, eliminates, in part, these data
issues from Census 2000.
As with standard block groups
submitted through the program, the
tribal block groups would be submitted
to the Census Bureau, and would be
subject to review to ensure compliance
with the final published criteria. Tribal
block groups will be defined as part of
a separate Tribal Statistical Areas
Program (TSAP) for the 2010 Census.
Detailed criteria pertaining to tribal
block groups will be published in a
separate Federal Register notice
pertaining to all American Indian
statistical areas defined through the
TSAP.
IV. Definitions of Key Terms
Alaska Native regional corporation
(ANRC)—A corporate geographic area
established under the Alaska Native
Claims Settlement Act (Pub. L. 92–203,
85 Stat. 688 (1971)), to conduct both, the
business and nonprofit affairs of Alaska
Natives. Twelve ANRCs cover the entire
State of Alaska except for the Annette
Island Reserve.
American Indian off-reservation trust
land (ORTL)—A federally recognized
American Indian land area located
outside the boundaries of an American
Indian reservation whose boundaries are
established by deed and over which a
federally recognized American Indian
tribal government has governmental
authority.
American Indian reservation (AIR)—A
federally recognized American Indian
land area with boundaries established
by final treaty, statute, executive order,
and/or court order and over which a
federally recognized American Indian
tribal government has governmental
authority. Along with reservation,
designations such as colonies,
communities, pueblos, rancherias, and
reserves apply to AIRs.
Conjoint—A description of a
boundary shared by two adjacent
geographic entities.
Contiguous—A description of areas
sharing common boundaries, such that
the areas, when combined, form a single
piece of territory. Noncontiguous areas
form disjoint pieces.
Group quarters (GQ)—A place where
people live or stay, in a group living
arrangement, that is owned or managed
by an entity or organization providing
housing and/or services for the
residents. This is not a typical
household-type living arrangement.
These services may include custodial or
medical care, as well as other types of
assistance, and residency is commonly
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13835
restricted to those receiving these
services. People living in GQs are
usually not related to each other. GQs
include such places as college residence
halls, residential treatment centers,
skilled nursing facilities, group homes,
military barracks, correctional facilities,
and workers’ dormitories.
Incorporated place—A type of
governmental unit, incorporated under
State law as a city, town (except in New
England, New York, and Wisconsin),
borough (except in Alaska and New
York), or village, generally to provide
governmental services for a
concentration of people within legally
prescribed boundaries.
Minor civil division (MCD)—The
primary governmental or administrative
division of a county in 28 states and the
Island Areas having legal boundaries,
names, and descriptions. MCDs
represent many different types of legal
entities with a wide variety of
characteristics, powers, and functions
depending on the state and type of
MCD. In some states, some or all of the
incorporated places also constitute
MCDs.
Nonvisible feature—A map feature
that is not visible on the ground, such
as a city or county boundary through
space, a property line, line-of-sight
extension of a road.
Special land use block group—Block
group delineated coextensive with, or
covering the same area as, the special
land use tract.
Special land use tract—Type of
census tract that must be designated as
a specific land use type (e.g., state park)
and have an official name (e.g., Jay
Cooke State Park), must have little or no
residential population or housing units,
and must not create a noncontiguous
census tract. If delineated in a densely
populated, urban area, a special land
use tract must have an area of
approximately one square mile or more.
If delineated completely outside an
urban area, a special land use tract must
have an area of approximately ten
square miles or more.
TIGER—Topologically Integrated
Geographic Encoding and Referencing
database developed by the Census
Bureau to support its mapping needs for
the decennial census and other Census
Bureau programs. The topological
structure of the TIGER database defines
the location and relationship of
boundaries, streets, rivers, railroads, and
other features to each other and to the
numerous geographic areas for which
the Census Bureau tabulates data from
its censuses and surveys.
Visible feature—A map feature that
can be seen on the ground, such as a
road, railroad track, major above-ground
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
13836
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 51 / Friday, March 14, 2008 / Notices
transmission line or pipeline, river or
stream, shoreline, fence, sharply defined
mountain ridge, or cliff. A nonstandard
visible feature is a feature that may not
be clearly defined on the ground (such
as a ridge), may be seasonal (such as an
intermittent stream), or may be
relatively impermanent (such as a
fence). The Census Bureau generally
requests verification that nonstandard
features used as boundaries for the
PSAP geographic areas pose no problem
in their location during field work.
Executive Order 12866
This notice has been determined to be
not significant under Executive Order
12866.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This program notice does not contain
a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
Dated: March 10, 2008.
Steve H. Murdock,
Director, Bureau of the Census.
[FR Doc. E8–5075 Filed 3–13–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of the Census
[Docket Number 070321065–7903–02]
Census Tract Program for the 2010
Decennial Census—Final Criteria
Bureau of the Census,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Final Criteria and
Program Implementation.
AGENCY:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
SUMMARY: Census tracts are relatively
permanent small-area geographic
divisions of a county or statistically
equivalent entity 1 defined for the
tabulation and presentation of data from
the decennial census and selected other
statistical programs. Census tracts will
also be used to tabulate and publish
estimates from the American
Community Survey (ACS) 2 after 2010.
1 For the Census Bureau’s purposes, the term
‘‘county’’ includes parishes in Louisiana; boroughs,
city and boroughs, municipalities, and census areas
in Alaska; independent cities in Maryland,
Missouri, Nevada, and Virginia; districts and
islands in American Samoa; districts in the U.S.
Virgin Islands; municipalities in the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands;
municipios in Puerto Rico; the areas constituting
the District of Columbia and Guam. This notice will
refer to all these entities collectively as ‘‘counties.’’
2 The ACS is conducted in the United States and
in Puerto Rico. In Puerto Rico the survey is called
the Puerto Rico Community Survey (PRCS). For
ease of discussion, throughout this document the
term ACS is used to represent the surveys
conducted in the United States and in Puerto Rico.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:17 Mar 13, 2008
Jkt 214001
The primary goal of the census tract
program is to provide a set of nationally
consistent small, statistical geographic
units, with stable boundaries, that
facilitate analysis of data across time.
This Notice announces the Bureau of
the Census’ (Census Bureau’s) final
criteria for the Census Tract Program for
the 2010 Decennial Census. In addition,
this Notice contains a summary of
comments received to proposed criteria
published in the April 6, 2007, Federal
Register (72 FR 17329), as well as the
Census Bureau’s response to those
comments. In response to comments
received, the Census Bureau has
modified its proposed criteria for the
Census Tract Program for the 2010
Decennial Census.
Upon publication of the final census
tract criteria contained in this Notice,
the Census Bureau will offer
governments, organizations, and
interested data users the opportunity to
review and, if necessary, suggest
updates to the boundaries and attributes
(e.g., tract code) of the census tracts in
their geographic area as part of the
Participant Statistical Areas Program
(PSAP). In addition, to census tracts, the
PSAP also encompasses the review and
update of block groups, census
designated places, and census county
divisions (in selected states).
DATES: This notice’s final criteria will be
effective on March 14, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Geographic Standards and Criteria
Branch, Geography Division, U.S.
Census Bureau, via e-mail at
geo.psap.list@census.gov or telephone at
(301) 763–3056.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. History of Census Tracts
In 1905, Dr. Walter Laidlaw originated
the concept of permanent, small
geographic areas as a framework for
studying change from one decennial
census to another in neighborhoods
within New York City. For the 1910
Census, eight cities—New York,
Baltimore, Boston, Chicago, Cleveland,
Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and St.
Louis—delineated census tracts (then
termed ‘‘districts’’) for the first time. No
additional jurisdictions delineated
census tracts until just prior to the 1930
Census, when an additional ten cities
chose to do so. The increased interest in
census tracts for the 1930 Census is
attributed to the promotional efforts of
Howard Whipple Green, who was a
statistician in Cleveland, Ohio, and later
the chairman of the American Statistical
Association’s Committee on Census
Enumeration Areas. For more than
twenty-five years, Mr. Green strongly
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
encouraged local citizens, via
committees, to establish census tracts
and other census statistical geographic
areas. The committees created by local
citizens were known as Census Tract
Committees, later called Census
Statistical Areas Committees.
After 1930, the Census Bureau saw
the need to standardize the delineation,
review, and updating of census tracts
and published the first set of census
tract criteria in 1934. The goal of the
criteria has remained unchanged; that
is, to assure comparability and data
reliability through the standardization
of the population thresholds for census
tracts, as well as requiring that their
boundaries follow specific types of
geographic features that do not change
frequently. The Census Bureau began
publishing census tract data as part of
its standard tabulations beginning with
the 1940 Census. Prior to that time,
census tract data were published as
special tabulations.
For the 1940 Census, the Census
Bureau began publishing census block
data for all cities with 50,000 or more
people. Census block numbers were
assigned, where possible, by census
tract, but for those cities that had not yet
delineated census tracts, ‘‘block areas’’
(called ‘‘block numbering areas’’ [BNAs]
in later censuses) were created to assign
census block numbers.
Starting with the 1960 Census, the
Census Bureau assumed a greater role in
promoting and coordinating the
delineation, review, and update of
census tracts. For the 1980 Census,
criteria for BNAs were changed to make
them more comparable in size and
shape to census tracts. For the 1990
Census, all counties contained either
census tracts or BNAs.
Census 2000 was the first decade in
which census tracts were defined in all
counties. In addition, the Census Bureau
increased the number of geographic
areas whose boundaries could be used
as census tract boundaries. It also
allowed tribal governments of federally
recognized American Indian tribes with
a reservation and/or off-reservation trust
lands to delineate tracts without regard
to State and/or county boundaries,
provided the tribe had a 1990 Census
population of at least 1,000.
II. Summary of Comments Received in
Response to the Proposed Criteria for
the Census Tract Program for the 2010
Decennial Census
The April 6, 2007, Federal Register
(72 FR 17329) requested comment on
the proposed census tract criteria for the
2010 Decennial Census which contained
the following changes to the criteria
used in the 2000 Decennial Census: (1)
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 51 (Friday, March 14, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13829-13836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-5075]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of the Census
[Docket Number 070126022-8027-02]
Census Block Group Program for the 2010 Decennial Census--Final
Criteria
AGENCY: Bureau of the Census, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of final criteria and program implementation.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Block groups are statistical geographic divisions of a census
tract, defined for the tabulation and presentation of decennial census
data. Block groups also will be used to tabulate and present period
estimates from the American Community Survey (ACS) \1\ after 2010.
Block groups provide the geographic framework within which the Bureau
of the Census (Census Bureau) defines census blocks. Each block group
comprises a reasonably compact and contiguous cluster of census blocks;
up to nine block groups can be contained within a single census tract.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The ACS is conducted in the United States and in Puerto
Rico. In Puerto Rico, the survey is called the Puerto Rico Community
Survey. For ease of discussion, throughout this document the term
ACS is used to represent both the survey that is conducted in the
United States and in Puerto Rico.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This Notice announces the Census Bureau's final criteria for the
Census Block Group Program for the 2010 Decennial Census. In addition,
this Notice contains a summary of comments received to proposed
criteria published in the April 6, 2007 Federal Register (72 FR 17337),
as well as the Census Bureau's response to these comments. In response
to comments received, the Census Bureau has modified its proposed
criteria for the Census Block Group Program for the 2010 Decennial
Census. Most provisions of the block group criteria for the 2010 Census
remain unchanged from those used in conjunction with the 2000 Decennial
Census, except as follows. First, the same population and housing unit
thresholds, a minimum of 600 people or 240 housing units and a maximum
of 3,000 people or 1,200 housing units, will apply to all types of
populated block groups, including block groups delineated within
American Indian reservations and off-reservation trust lands, the
Island Areas, and encompassing group quarters, military installations,
and institutions. Second, housing unit counts may be used instead of
population counts in the delineation of block groups. Third, the
delineation of special land use tracts will be permitted, and
encouraged, for areas with special land uses (e.g., airports, military
reservations, public forests, public parks, and special places/group
quarters) with an official name. Finally, a geographic framework of
tribal block groups, separate from the standard block groups defined
within counties, will be defined within federally recognized American
Indian reservations and/or off-reservation trust lands, subject to
other population, housing, and boundary criteria contained in this
document.
Upon publication of the final criteria contained in this Notice,
the Census Bureau will offer governments, organizations, and interested
data users an opportunity to review and, if necessary, suggest updates
to the boundaries and attributes of the block groups in their
geographic area under the Participant Statistical Areas Program (PSAP).
In addition to block groups, the PSAP also encompasses the review and
update of census tracts, census designated places, and census county
divisions (in selected states).
DATES: This notice's final criteria will be effective on March 14,
2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Geographic Standards and Criteria
Branch, Geography Division, U.S. Census Bureau, via e-mail at
geo.psap.list@census.gov or telephone at (301) 763-3056.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. History of Block Groups
The Census Bureau first delineated block groups as statistical
geographic divisions of census tracts for the 1970 Census, comprising
contiguous combinations of census blocks for data presentation
purposes. At that time, census block groups only existed in urbanized
areas in which census blocks were defined. Block groups were defined
without regard to political and
[[Page 13830]]
administrative boundaries, with an average population of 1,000, and to
be approximately equal in area.
As use of census block, block group, and census tract data
increased among data users, the Census Bureau expanded these programs
to cover additional geographic areas while redefining the population
threshold criteria to more adequately suit data users' needs. The 1990
Census was the first in which census blocks and block groups were
defined throughout the entirety of the United States, Puerto Rico, and
the Island Areas. For Census 2000, as with census tracts, the Census
Bureau increased the number of geographic areas whose boundaries could
be used as block group boundaries, and allowed tribal governments of
federally recognized American Indian tribes with a reservation and/or
off-reservation trust lands to delineate block groups without regard to
state and/or county boundaries, provided the tribe had a 1990 Census
population of at least 1,000.
II. Summary of Comments Received in Response to Proposed Criteria for
the Census Block Group Program for the 2010 Census
The April 6, 2007, Federal Register (72 FR 17337) requested comment
on the proposed criteria for delineating block groups for the 2010
Decennial Census which contained the following changes to the criteria
used in the 2000 Decennial Census: (1) Increasing the minimum
population and housing unit thresholds for block groups from 600 to
1,200 persons; (2) using housing unit counts (as an alternative to
population counts) in the delineation review and update of block
groups; (3) applying the same population and housing unit thresholds to
all types of populated block groups in the United States,\2\ including
block groups delineated on American Indian reservations and/or off-
reservation trust lands,\3\ the Island Areas,\4\ and encompassing group
quarters, military installations, and institutions; (4) allowing the
delineation of block groups for large water bodies with areas of
approximately 100 square miles or more, and special land uses (e.g.,
large airports or public parks) with an official name; and (5) allowing
for geographic frameworks of tribal block groups (separate from the
standard block groups defined within counties and standard census
tracts) to be defined within federally recognized American Indian
reservations and/or off-reservation trust lands.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ For Census Bureau purposes, the United States includes the
fifty states and the District of Columbia.
\3\ The proposed criteria for the tribal statistical areas
program will be outlined in a separate Federal Register notice. In
the tribal statistical areas program, federally recognized American
Indian tribes that have a reservation and/or off-reservation trust
land may delineate census designated places and, if these areas have
a population of 1,200 or greater, may delineate tribal tracts and
tribal block groups for their reservation and off-reservation trust
land.
\4\ For Census Bureau purposes, the Island Areas includes
American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,
Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the U.S. Minor Outlying Islands.
The U.S. Minor Outlying Islands is an aggregation of nine U.S.
territories: Baker Island, Howland Island, Jarvis Island, Johnston
Atoll, Kingman Reef, Midway Islands, Navassa Island, Palmyra Atoll,
and Wake Island.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Census Bureau received letters (each containing comments on
several issues) from 33 organizations and individuals on the proposed
minimum population and housing unit thresholds in the review and update
of block groups, the proposed use of housing unit counts in the review
and update of block groups, and the permitted delineation of census
tracts for large water bodies and special land use tracts for which a
single coextensive block group would be delineated. Comments received
are summarized below, as well as the Census Bureau's response to these
comments.
1. Minimum population and housing unit count thresholds in the
review and update of block groups.
The Census Bureau received 32 comments opposed to increasing the
minimum population threshold for block groups from 600 to 1,200. Only
one commenter favored the proposed increase citing the need to maintain
statistical reliability. Nearly all commenters expressed strong concern
about the resulting loss of geographic detail and the detrimental
impact on demographic analysis for small geographic areas should the
minimum population be increased to 1,200. Commenters opposed to an
increased minimum threshold included metropolitan planning
organizations, councils of governments, local governmental agencies,
private sector data users, a state redistricting liaison, and members
of the Census Advisory Committee Professional Associations.
Additional research by the Census Bureau indicated that
coefficients of variation for selected demographic characteristics did
not improve substantially for block groups of 1,200 people compared to
block groups of 600 people. Given the comments opposed to the proposed
increased threshold, and taking into consideration the loss of
geographic detail without substantive improvement to data quality and
reliability, the Census Bureau will not change the minimum population
threshold for block groups. The minimum block group threshold will
remain at 600 people (240 housing units) for the 2010 Census.
Participants reviewing and delineating block groups for the 2010 Census
and data users utilizing the sample-based data for block groups must be
aware of the sample data reliability issues for geographies with low
populations and the appropriate uses for sample data for low population
geographies. The Census Bureau will provide additional information
about sample data reliability and appropriate uses of sample data for
geographic areas with low populations in the PSAP guidelines.
2. Using housing unit counts in the review and update of block
groups.
The Census Bureau received five comments in response to the
proposed use of housing unit counts in the review and update of block
groups as an alternative to population counts where appropriate. Four
commenters supported the concept. Another supported the proposal, but
requested more guidance on when housing units, instead of population,
should be used to define block groups. Given the support of using
housing unit counts in the review and update for census tracts, the
Census Bureau will retain the concept in the final criteria for the
2010 Census. Guidance as to when housing unit counts should be used in
place of population counts in the review and update of census tracts
will be discussed in this notice, and further detailed in the PSAP
guidelines.
3. Permitting the delineation of census tracts, with coextensive
block groups, for large water bodies and special land uses.
The Census Bureau received five comments in response to the
proposed special land use tract and block group proposal. Four
commenters representing various levels of local government, as well as
nongovernmental organizations supported the concept. One commenter
suggested that more discussion on the concept is needed to make an
informed decision. Given the support of the special land use tract and
coextensive block group designation, the Census Bureau will retain the
concept in the final criteria for the 2010 Census.
The Census Bureau received three comments in response to the
proposed large water body tract and block group proposal. Two
commenters supported the concept. One commenter opposed the concept,
citing increased confusion and disorientation for data users with
respect to what is commonly depicted on non-census maps. Based on this
[[Page 13831]]
comment and after additional internal review, the Census Bureau has
determined not to retain the large water block group concept in the
final criteria for the 2010 Census.
Changes to the Proposed Criteria as a Result of Public Comments
Changes made to the final criteria (from the proposed criteria) in
``Section III, General Principles and Criteria for Block Groups for the
2010 Census'' are as follows:
1. Section A, ``General Principles,'' subsection 3: renumbered in
this notice as subsection 2. We moved this section to emphasize that
block groups form the geographic framework within which the Census
Bureau defines census blocks.
2. Section A, ``General Principles,'' subsection 2: renumbered in
this notice as subsection 3. The first sentence in this subsection has
been reworded to provide greater specificity and clarity. We added the
third sentence pertaining to the Census Bureau's disclosure rules; this
sentence had appeared in Section B.1 of the previous notice. In the
fourth sentence, we replaced ``local governments and planners'' with
``PSAP participants'' because not all participants in the 2010 PSAP
will be representatives of local governments or will be professional
planners. We also added sentences that clarify the minimum population
and housing unit thresholds, noting that any block group with a
population or housing unit count less than the minimum threshold should
be updated, and clarifying that the Census Bureau will use Census 2000
population and housing unit counts to assess whether each block group
submitted meets the minimum threshold criterion.
3. Section A, ``General Principles:'' added subsection 4, which
notes that housing unit counts may be used in the review and updating
of block groups, particularly with regard to communities that may not
have sufficient residential population present on the date of the
decennial census, but will have larger populations at other times of
the year and for which estimates may be reflected in the ACS.
4. Section A, ``General Principles,'' subsection 4: renumbered in
this notice as section 5. This subsection was moved because the new
subsection 4 (see above) is closely related to issues discussed in
subsection 3. We removed the reference to water body block groups since
this proposed criterion has not been adopted in the final criteria.
5. Section B, ``Changes to the Block Group Criteria for the 2010
Census:'' this section was omitted from this notice as all changes are
addressed in the final criteria.
6. Section C, ``Block Group Criteria for the 2010 Census,''
subsection 1: Renumbered in this notice as subsection 3. We revised the
order of the first few criteria for clarity. Section C in the April 6,
2007 Federal Register (72 FR 17337) is now Section B in this Notice.
7. Section C, ``Block Group Criteria for the 2010 Census,''
subsection 2: Renumbered in this notice as subsection 1, for clarity.
We also changed the population threshold referenced in the subsection
from 1,200 to 600, to reflect the decision to retain the latter as the
minimum population threshold for a block group.
8. Section C, ``Block Group Criteria for the 2010 Census,''
subsection 3: Renumbered in this notice as subsection 2, reflecting the
decision to revise the order of the first few criteria listed. Removed
the last sentence relating to water body block groups since this
proposed criterion has not been adopted in the final criteria.
9. Section C, ``Block Group Criteria for the 2010 Census,''
subsection 4: The second sentence was moved to the third sentence in
this notice and the word ``permits'' was changed to ``requires'' to
clarify that state and county boundaries must form block group
boundaries.
10. Section C, ``Block Group Criteria for the 2010 Census,''
subsection 5: Added the word ``measurement'' after ``area'' in both the
text and the tables in this subsection. In addition, in subsection 5.c,
all text relating to water body block groups was removed since this
proposed criterion has not been adopted in the final criteria.
11. Section D, ``Tribal Block Groups:'' We revised wording
throughout the section to provide greater clarity. Discussion of tribal
block groups is contained in Section C of this Notice.
III. General Principles and Criteria for Block Groups for the 2010
Census
A. General Principles
1. Block groups are statistical geographic divisions of a census
tract, defined by the Census Bureau in cooperation with local officials
and organizations, for the tabulation and dissemination of decennial
census data, as well as period estimates of demographic and housing
characteristics from the ACS.
2. Block groups form the geographic framework within which the
Census Bureau defines census blocks for use in tabulating and
presenting decennial census data. Census blocks are numbered within
block groups.
3. The sample size for the ACS is smaller than the sample from the
decennial census long form of previous censuses. As a general rule,
estimates from programs providing sample data, including the ACS, for
geographic areas with smaller populations will be subject to higher
variances than comparable estimates for areas with larger populations
(i.e., the sample data for smaller population geographies will likely
be less reliable than the sample data for geographies with larger
population). In addition, the Census Bureau's disclosure rules may have
the effect of restricting the availability and amount of sample data
published for geographic areas with small populations. Aiming to create
block groups that fall between the minimum and maximum thresholds will
improve the reliability and availability of data, and PSAP participants
should consider these factors when defining their block groups.
Therefore, each block group must encompass at least 600 people or
at least 240 housing units unless it is coextensive with a flagged
special land use tract, or is coextensive with a county with fewer than
600 people. Any block group with a population or housing unit count
less than the minimum threshold should be updated to meet or exceed the
minimum threshold. The Census Bureau will use Census 2000 population
and housing unit counts, with allowance made for growth since 2000, to
assess whether each submitted block group meets this criterion. Program
participants may submit local estimates as a surrogate for the Census
2000 population and housing unit counts for a block group.
4. With the advent of the ACS and the ``continuous measurement'' of
characteristics of the population and housing based on a five-year
average, there are some new issues to consider in the block group
criteria. To accommodate this change, either population or housing
units may be used in the review of block groups. The use of housing
unit counts accommodates seasonal communities in which residents often
are not present on the date of the decennial census, but will be
present at other times of the year and for which estimates may be
reflected in the ACS. The ACS is designed to produce local area data as
of a 12-month period estimate (or an average); whereas, in the past
local area data were only represented as of the April 1 census day.
5. The Census Bureau recognizes that there are geographic areas
that are not characterized by a residential population, and which local
participants may wish to separate from populated block groups for
analytical or
[[Page 13832]]
cartographic purposes or both. Such areas may be designated as special
land use block groups to distinguish them from populated block groups.
Special land use block groups must be designated as a specific type of
land use (e.g., state park, municipal park) and have an official name,
generally have little or no residential population or housing units,
and must not create a noncontiguous block group. If located in a
densely populated urban area, a special land use block group must have
an area measurement of approximately one square mile or more. If
delineated completely outside an urban area, a special land use block
group must have an area of approximately 10 square miles or more. The
Census Bureau recognizes that some special land use areas not intended
for residential population, such as parks, may contain some population,
such as caretakers or the homeless. Our intent is to allow for the
delineation of parks and other special land use areas as separate block
groups and therefore will accept such areas as block groups even if
some residential population is present.
B. Block Group Criteria for the 2010 Census
The criteria herein apply to the United States, including federally
recognized American Indian reservations and off-reservation trust
lands, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas. The Census Bureau may modify
and, if necessary, reject any proposals for block groups that do not
meet these final criteria. In addition, the Census Bureau reserves the
right to modify the boundaries and attributes of block groups as needed
to meet the published criteria and/or maintain geographic relationships
before the final tabulation geography is set for the 2010 Census.
The Census Bureau sets forth the following criteria for use in
delineating 2010 census block groups:
1. Block groups must not cross census tract boundaries.
This criterion takes precedence over all other criteria or
requirements. By definition, because census tracts cannot cross county
and state boundaries, neither can block groups. It is only permissible
to define a block group with fewer than 600 people in a county that has
a population less than 600, or as coextensive with a special land use
tract.
2. Block groups must cover the entire land and water area of each
census tract.
Because census tracts must cover the entire area of a county, by
definition, block groups also must cover the entire area of each
county.
3. A block group must comprise a reasonable compact, contiguous
land area.
Noncontiguous boundaries are permitted only where a contiguous area
or inaccessible area would not meet population or housing unit count
requirements for a separate block group, in which case the
noncontiguous or inaccessible area must be combined within an adjacent
or proximate block group. For example, an island that does not meet the
minimum population threshold for recognition as a separate block group
should be combined with other proximate land to form a single block
group. Each case will be reviewed and accepted at the Census Bureau's
discretion.
4. Block group boundaries should follow visible and identifiable
features.
To make the location of block group boundaries less ambiguous,
wherever possible, block group boundaries should follow visible and
identifiable features. The use of visible features makes it easier to
locate and identify block group boundaries over time as the locations
of many visible features in the landscape tend to change infrequently.
The Census Bureau also requires the use of state and county boundaries
in all states, and permits the use of incorporated place and minor
civil division boundaries in states where those boundaries tend to
remain unchanged over time (see Table 1).
The following features are preferred as block group boundaries for
the 2010 Census:
a. State, county, and census tract boundaries must always be block
group boundaries. This criterion takes precedence over all other
boundary criteria or requirements.
b. American Indian reservation and off-reservation trust land
boundaries.
c. Visible, perennial natural and cultural features, such as roads,
shorelines, rivers, perennial streams and canals, railroad tracks, or
above-ground high-tension power lines.
d. Boundaries of legal and administrative entities in selected
states.
Table 1 identifies by state which minor civil division (MCD) and
incorporated place boundaries may be used as block group boundaries.
Table 1.--Acceptable MCD and Incorporated Place Boundaries
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Boundaries of
MCDs not
coincident with All Only conjoint
All MCD the boundaries incorporated incorporated
Boundaries boundaries of incorporated place place
places that boundaries boundaries
themselves are
MCDs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama..................................... ............... ............... ............... X
Alaska...................................... ............... ............... ............... X
Arizona..................................... ............... ............... ............... X
Arkansas.................................... ............... ............... ............... X
California.................................. ............... ............... ............... X
Colorado.................................... ............... ............... ............... X
Connecticut................................. X ............... X ...............
Delaware.................................... ............... ............... ............... X
Florida..................................... ............... ............... ............... X
Georgia..................................... ............... ............... ............... X
Hawaii...................................... ............... ............... ............... X
Idaho....................................... ............... ............... ............... X
Illinois.................................... ............... X \a\ ............... X
Indiana..................................... X ............... ............... X
Iowa........................................ ............... X ............... X
Kansas...................................... ............... X ............... X
Kentucky.................................... ............... ............... ............... X
Louisiana................................... ............... ............... ............... X
[[Page 13833]]
Maine....................................... X ............... X ...............
Maryland.................................... ............... ............... ............... X
Massachusetts............................... X ............... X ...............
Michigan.................................... ............... X ............... X
Minnesota................................... ............... X ............... X
Mississippi................................. ............... ............... ............... X
Missouri.................................... ............... X \b\ ............... X
Montana..................................... ............... ............... ............... X
Nebraska.................................... ............... X \a\ ............... X
Nevada...................................... ............... ............... ............... X
New Hampshire............................... X ............... X ...............
New Jersey.................................. X ............... X ...............
New Mexico.................................. ............... ............... ............... X
New York.................................... X ............... X ...............
North Carolina.............................. ............... ............... ............... X
North Dakota................................ ............... X ............... X
Ohio........................................ ............... X ............... X
Oklahoma.................................... ............... ............... ............... X
Oregon...................................... ............... ............... ............... X
Pennsylvania................................ X ............... X ...............
Rhode Island................................ X ............... X ...............
South Carolina.............................. ............... ............... ............... X
South Dakota................................ ............... X ............... X
Tennessee................................... ............... ............... ............... X
Texas....................................... ............... ............... ............... X
Utah........................................ ............... ............... ............... X
Vermont..................................... X ............... X ...............
Virginia.................................... ............... ............... ............... X
Washington.................................. ............... ............... ............... X
West Virginia............................... ............... ............... ............... X
Wisconsin................................... ............... X ............... X
Wyoming..................................... ............... ............... ............... X
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Townships only.
\b\ Governmental townships only.
e. Additionally, the following legally defined, administrative
boundaries are permitted as block group boundaries:
i. Barrio, barrio-pueblo, and subbarrio boundaries in Puerto Rico;
ii. Census subdistrict boundaries in the U.S. Virgin Islands;
iii. County and island boundaries (both MCD equivalents) in
American Samoa;
iv. Election district boundaries in Guam;
v. Municipal district boundaries in the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands; and
vi. Alaska Native regional corporation boundaries in Alaska, at the
discretion of the Census Bureau, insofar as such boundaries are
unambiguous for allocating living quarters as part of 2010 Census
activities.
f. When acceptable visible and governmental boundary features are
not available for use as block group boundaries, the Census Bureau may,
at its discretion, approve other nonstandard visible features, such as
ridge lines, above-ground pipelines, intermittent streams, or fence
lines. The Census Bureau may also accept, on a case-by-case basis, the
boundaries of selected nonstandard and potentially nonvisible features,
such as the boundaries of military installations, National Parks,
National Monuments, National Forests, other types of parks or forests,
airports, marine ports, cemeteries, golf courses, penitentiaries/
prisons, glaciers, or the straight-line extensions of visible features
and other lines-of-sight.
5. Population, Housing Unit, and Area Measurement Thresholds
The following are the population, housing unit, and area
measurement threshold criteria for block groups (as summarized in Table
2).
Table 2.--Block Group Thresholds
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Block group type Threshold type Minimum Maximum
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & tribal block groups...... Population threshold... 600..................... 3,000.
Housing Unit threshold. 240..................... 1,200.
Special land use block groups....... Area measurement 1.0..................... none.
threshold within an
urban area (square
miles).
[[Page 13834]]
Area measurement 10...................... none.
threshold outside an
urban area (square
miles).
Population thresholds.. (1) Little or none, or within standard block
group thresholds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The same population and housing unit thresholds apply to all types
of populated block groups, including block groups delineated within
American Indian reservations and off-reservation trust lands, the
Island Areas, and encompassing group quarters, military installations,
and institutions. This should improve the availability and reliability
of data for block groups that had a lower threshold for the 2000
Decennial Census, and will create a single national standard.
a. Census 2000 population counts should be used in census block
group review in most cases. Housing unit counts should be used for
block groups in seasonal communities that have no or low population on
census day (April 1). Locally produced population and housing unit
estimates can be used when reviewing and updating block groups,
especially in areas that have experienced considerable growth since
Census 2000.
b. The housing unit thresholds are based on a national average of
2.5 people per household. The Census Bureau recognizes that there are
regional variations to this average, and will take this into
consideration when reviewing all census block group proposals.
c. For the 2010 Census, the Census Bureau will allow the
delineation of special land use census tracts, and special land use
block groups will be created coextensive with these special land use
tracts. A special land use tract, and hence a special land use block
group, must be designated as a specific land use type (e.g., state
park), must have an official name (e.g., Jay Cooke State Park), have
little or no residential population or meet population or housing unit
thresholds, and must not create a noncontiguous tract/block group. In
some instances, multiple areas can be combined to form a single special
land use tract/block group if the land management characteristics are
similar, such as a special land use tract/block group comprising
adjacent federal and state parks. If the special land use tract/block
group is delineated in a densely populated, urban area, the tract/block
group must have an area of approximately one square mile or more. If
the special land use tract/block group is delineated completely outside
an urban area, the tract/block group must have an area of approximately
10 square miles or more.
6. Identification of Block Groups
a. A block group encompasses a cluster of census blocks. Each
standard block group is identified using a single-digit number that
will correspond to the first digit in the number of each block
encompassed by the block group. For example, block group 3 includes all
census blocks numbered in the 3000 range within a single census tract.
b. The range of acceptable standard block group numbers is 1
through 9. Block group numbers must always be unique within a census
tract.
7. Block Group Types
Table 3 below contains a summary of the types of block groups (with
their respective population, housing unit and area measurement
thresholds) that will be used for the 2010 Census.
Table 3.--Summary of Block Group Types
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How distinct from
standard block Population Housing unit Area measurement
groups thresholds thresholds thresholds
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & tribal block groups.. Tribal block Minimum: 600; Minimum: 240; none.
groups are Maximum: 3,000. Maximum: 1,200.
conceptually
similar and
equivalent to
census block
groups defined
within the
standard State-
county-tract-
block group
geographic
hierarchy used
for tabulating
and publishing
statistical data.
Special land use block groups... A block group Little or none, or Little or none, or 1.0 square mile
coextensive with within the within the within an urban
a special land standard block standard block area/10 square
use tract, group thresholds. group thresholds. miles outside an
encompassing a urban area.
large airport,
public park, or
public forest
with little or no
population or
housing units. In
a densely
populated, urban
area, a special
land use block
group must be
approximately 1.0
square mile in
area or greater.
If delineated
completely
outside an urban
area, a special
land use block
group must have
an area of 10
square miles or
greater.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Tribal Block Groups
Tribal block groups are statistical geographic entities defined by
the Census Bureau in cooperation with tribal officials to provide
meaningful, relevant, and reliable data for small geographic areas
within the boundaries of federally recognized American Indian
reservations and/or off-reservation trust lands. As such, they
recognize the unique statistical data needs of federally recognized
American Indian tribes. The delineation of tribal block groups allows
for an unambiguous presentation of statistical data specific to a
federally recognized reservation and/or off-reservation trust land
without the imposition of state or county boundaries, which might
artificially separate American Indian populations located within a
single reservation and/or off-reservation trust land. To this end, the
American Indian tribal participant \5\
[[Page 13835]]
may define tribal block groups that cross county or state boundaries,
or both. Tribal block groups must be delineated to meet all other
census block group criteria, and must be identified uniquely so as to
clearly distinguish them from county-based block groups. The Census
Bureau will address the type of identifiers required for tribal block
groups in more detail in a separate Federal Register notice pertaining
to American Indian statistical areas. Tribal block group boundaries
will be held as census block boundaries. Census blocks, however, will
be numbered uniquely within county-based block groups, and thus there
will not be a direct relationship between a tribal block group
identifier and census block numbers. Tribal block groups are
conceptually similar and equivalent to census block groups defined
within the standard state-county-tract-block group geographic hierarchy
used for tabulating and publishing statistical data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ For federally recognized American Indian tribes with
reservations and/or off-reservation trust lands that have more than
1,200 residents, the Census Bureau will offer the tribal government
the opportunity to delineate tribal block groups and other tribal
statistical geography on their reservation and/or off-reservation
trust land. For federally recognized tribes with an American Indian
reservation and/or off-reservation trust land that have fewer than
1,200 residents, the Census Bureau will define one tribal tract and
one tribal block group coextensive with the American Indian
reservation and/or off-reservation trust land.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In order to provide meaningful statistical geographic areas within
the reservation and/or off-reservation trust land, as well as make
meaningful and reliable data available for these areas and their
populations, for the 2010 Census, tribal block group geography will be
maintained separately from standard county-based block groups, and will
be defined through a separate program designed specifically for tribal
statistical geography. This differs from the procedure for Census 2000
in which tribal block groups were defined for federally recognized
American Indian reservations and/or off-reservation trust lands, and
standard block groups were identified by superimposing county and state
boundaries onto the Census 2000 tribal block groups.
For Census 2000 products in which data were presented by state and
county, the standard state-county-tract-block group hierarchy was
maintained, even for territory contained within an American Indian
reservation and/or off-reservation trust land. In such instances, the
state/county portions of tribal block groups were identified as
individual block groups, and these standard block groups may not have
met the minimum population or housing unit thresholds, potentially
limiting sample data reliability or availability for both the tribal
block group and the derived standard block groups. The change for the
2010 Census, creating standard block groups nationwide and maintaining
tribal block groups as a completely separate set of geography from
standard block groups in both geographic and data presentation
purposes, eliminates, in part, these data issues from Census 2000.
As with standard block groups submitted through the program, the
tribal block groups would be submitted to the Census Bureau, and would
be subject to review to ensure compliance with the final published
criteria. Tribal block groups will be defined as part of a separate
Tribal Statistical Areas Program (TSAP) for the 2010 Census. Detailed
criteria pertaining to tribal block groups will be published in a
separate Federal Register notice pertaining to all American Indian
statistical areas defined through the TSAP.
IV. Definitions of Key Terms
Alaska Native regional corporation (ANRC)--A corporate geographic
area established under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (Pub. L.
92-203, 85 Stat. 688 (1971)), to conduct both, the business and
nonprofit affairs of Alaska Natives. Twelve ANRCs cover the entire
State of Alaska except for the Annette Island Reserve.
American Indian off-reservation trust land (ORTL)--A federally
recognized American Indian land area located outside the boundaries of
an American Indian reservation whose boundaries are established by deed
and over which a federally recognized American Indian tribal government
has governmental authority.
American Indian reservation (AIR)--A federally recognized American
Indian land area with boundaries established by final treaty, statute,
executive order, and/or court order and over which a federally
recognized American Indian tribal government has governmental
authority. Along with reservation, designations such as colonies,
communities, pueblos, rancherias, and reserves apply to AIRs.
Conjoint--A description of a boundary shared by two adjacent
geographic entities.
Contiguous--A description of areas sharing common boundaries, such
that the areas, when combined, form a single piece of territory.
Noncontiguous areas form disjoint pieces.
Group quarters (GQ)--A place where people live or stay, in a group
living arrangement, that is owned or managed by an entity or
organization providing housing and/or services for the residents. This
is not a typical household-type living arrangement. These services may
include custodial or medical care, as well as other types of
assistance, and residency is commonly restricted to those receiving
these services. People living in GQs are usually not related to each
other. GQs include such places as college residence halls, residential
treatment centers, skilled nursing facilities, group homes, military
barracks, correctional facilities, and workers' dormitories.
Incorporated place--A type of governmental unit, incorporated under
State law as a city, town (except in New England, New York, and
Wisconsin), borough (except in Alaska and New York), or village,
generally to provide governmental services for a concentration of
people within legally prescribed boundaries.
Minor civil division (MCD)--The primary governmental or
administrative division of a county in 28 states and the Island Areas
having legal boundaries, names, and descriptions. MCDs represent many
different types of legal entities with a wide variety of
characteristics, powers, and functions depending on the state and type
of MCD. In some states, some or all of the incorporated places also
constitute MCDs.
Nonvisible feature--A map feature that is not visible on the
ground, such as a city or county boundary through space, a property
line, line-of-sight extension of a road.
Special land use block group--Block group delineated coextensive
with, or covering the same area as, the special land use tract.
Special land use tract--Type of census tract that must be
designated as a specific land use type (e.g., state park) and have an
official name (e.g., Jay Cooke State Park), must have little or no
residential population or housing units, and must not create a
noncontiguous census tract. If delineated in a densely populated, urban
area, a special land use tract must have an area of approximately one
square mile or more. If delineated completely outside an urban area, a
special land use tract must have an area of approximately ten square
miles or more.
TIGER--Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing
database developed by the Census Bureau to support its mapping needs
for the decennial census and other Census Bureau programs. The
topological structure of the TIGER database defines the location and
relationship of boundaries, streets, rivers, railroads, and other
features to each other and to the numerous geographic areas for which
the Census Bureau tabulates data from its censuses and surveys.
Visible feature--A map feature that can be seen on the ground, such
as a road, railroad track, major above-ground
[[Page 13836]]
transmission line or pipeline, river or stream, shoreline, fence,
sharply defined mountain ridge, or cliff. A nonstandard visible feature
is a feature that may not be clearly defined on the ground (such as a
ridge), may be seasonal (such as an intermittent stream), or may be
relatively impermanent (such as a fence). The Census Bureau generally
requests verification that nonstandard features used as boundaries for
the PSAP geographic areas pose no problem in their location during
field work.
Executive Order 12866
This notice has been determined to be not significant under
Executive Order 12866.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This program notice does not contain a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35.
Dated: March 10, 2008.
Steve H. Murdock,
Director, Bureau of the Census.
[FR Doc. E8-5075 Filed 3-13-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P